Armstrong Economics Blog/Conspiracy Re-Posted May 23, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on May 22, 2021 | Sundance | 190 Comments

An interesting about-face from the Dept of Labor and OSHA.  Previously OSHA stated that any employer who required vaccinations must report adverse reactions as workplace injuries.  However, OSHA is now saying they will not “enforce” that record-keeping requirement until May of 2022.

Essentially, vaccine mandating employers don’t have to start recording vaccination reactions as workplace injuries for another year.   This is a complete reversal from the OSHA position earlier this month.  The rules have now been modified as below:

OSHA – “DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.” (LINK)

Notice the obtuse wording: “OSHA will not enforce” the recording requirement.   So long as everyone sticks to “don’t ask/don’t tell” employers will no longer be penalized on their workplace injuries (OSHA log) and/or insurance rate from negative results of mandated, untested, non-FDA approved, vaccines.

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on May 22, 2021 | Sundance | 204 Comments

The state of California has released the new guidance that will begin on June 15th (no reasoning for date given) that permits returning to almost all non-COVID activities for California residents. [DETAILS HERE]  Essentially it appears that most pre-COVID activities are now authorized by the state; however, large venue gatherings indoors and outdoors will require masks by non-vaccinated persons.

Unlike Oregon who is requiring an entry check for non-mask wearing residents to prove their vaccinated status, within the California rules there is an allowed “self attestation” of vaccination compliance: “Businesses and venue operators may also utilize self-attestation at point of registration, during ticket purchase or on the day of the event prior to entry into the venue.”

The full details are available from California STATE HERE

Armstrong Economics Blog/Conspiracy Re-Posted May 21, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

The egotistical Bill Gates apparently wanted the Nobel Peace Prize like Al Gore for his climate change efforts, or perhaps for his zero CO2 and reducing the population arguments. Gates apparently would send employees to the Nobel ceremonies just in case he was to be awarded some honor. It turns out that Gates believed that Jeffrey Epstein had the connections to get him the prize. Interestingly enough, Epstein may have helped Al Gore get his Nobel Prize. Even one of Epstein’s sex slaves said she met Al Gore through Ghislaine Maxwell.

Epstein cultivated elites clearly for power. Epstein even had Nobel Prize winners Frank Wilczek, Gerald Edelman, and Murray Gell-Mann in his list of elites. Despite reports of abuse of underage girls, Gates and others were always happy to accept funding from Epstein and/or meet with him for favors. Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates met with the chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee. Claims that Obama gave the Medal of Freedom to Epstein are not true. Obama did give Gates the Medal of Freedom.

Once again, I believe that Epstein used the underage girls as a honey trap to buy influence through blackmail. I believe that Gates was attracted to that power, and the more this divorce unfolds, the greater the details may yet emerge.

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on May 21, 2021 | Sundance | 324 Comments

There are approximately ten plaintiffs in an ongoing lawsuit about the election and ballot tabulation in Fulton County (Atlanta), Georgia.  The state and local officials had been denying access to the physical ballots, only permitting a review of low resolution scanned images.  However, an expert testified a disparity of approximately 21% (of those “low resolution” absentee ballot batches) from what the state reported to what the auditors were able to see.  A large number of the scanned ballots appear to have been counted twice.

The only way to really tell if any of the batches contained duplicated or photocopied ballots would be to look at the physical ballots (preferred) or to look at high-resolution images of the physical ballots.

Today a Georgia judge agreed to allow the plaintiffs to review the physical ballots in a process yet determined (future order forthcoming).  The custody of the ballots will remain under the control of the Fulton County election officials, but the auditors will be permitted access to them.   This could be significant as there are 145,000 specific Fulton County absentee ballots at issue.

[Side Note: a prior observer of the CCTV system noted that election workers were opening absentee ballots from Chinese origins (LINK)]

ABC News Story HERE – Atlanta Journal Constitution News Story Here

ATLANTA – Georgia is headed for another review of its presidential election results after a judge agreed to unseal more than 145,000 Fulton County absentee ballots Friday.

The details and timing of the review must still be determined. But the plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the county want to scan and examine the ballots to determine whether they are legitimate. At a hearing Friday, Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero made clear the ballots must remain in the custody of Fulton election officials.

[…] Amero said he intends to order the absentee ballots to be scanned by county officials to produce high-resolution images. The plaintiffs want to examine those images as to determine whether they are fraudulent. For example, the high-resolution images could be used to determine whether ballots were filled out by hand or mass produced by a copy machine.

[…] Attorneys for Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger argued against unsealing the paper ballots in a court brief last month. They said the plaintiffs had no legal authority to independently verify and tabulate ballots. However, in a statement Friday, Raffensperger struck a different tone.

“From day one I have encouraged Georgians with concerns about the election in their counties to pursue those claims through legal avenues,” Raffensperger said. “Fulton County has a long-standing history of election mismanagement that has understandably weakened voters’ faith in its system. Allowing this audit provides another layer of transparency and citizen engagement.” (read more)

Similar to Baltimore Maryland, Atlanta Georgia is a hot-bed of corruption at almost every level of government.  From the school system to local elected officials there have been widespread arrests over the years for corruption.  It would be a surprise if election officials were not breaking the law in Fulton County…. it is, quite simply, how they operate.

BACKGROUND STORY for Context

More than three dozen educators were indicted in 2013. • 21 educators pled guilty before trial. • 12 Educators and Administrators went to trial and faced felony charges. • 11 of the 12 were found guilty!

Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted May 20, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

AG Letitia James revealed her investigation into the Trump Organization has gone from a civil probe to a criminal investigation. This is the way the law is used to abuse people and this is being done to try to prevent Trump from running in 2024 or any of his family. The word is James is out to make sure Trump does not run in 2024.

The dirty tricks of politics and criminal prosecutions is a serious problem in our legal system. Perhaps you will recall the IRS targeting Tea Party organizations to interfere in the elections under Obama. When the IRS was ordered to turn over all emails for the investigation, they pulled a Hillary – Oh sorry, we lost all emails.

Back in 1992, I was in Tokyo and about to fly home when I received a phone call asking me to fly to Texas to meet with Ross Perot to help assess his character to be president. I rearranged my flight from New York to Texas. Then suddenly, Ross Perot withdrew claiming there was a plot to disrupt his daughter’s wedding. Even Bill Clinton said he did not know what to say despite the fact that the allegations were made against Bush and the Republicans. The truth was really that Perot had a free port airport and he was threatened with an investigation of his entities. He suddenly dropped out talking nonsense about his daughter’s wedding. As always, somehow I seem to have been in the middle of so many interesting events.

Lyndon LaRouche, Jr. (1922-2019) was a candidate for President eight times between 1976 and 2004 and even ran TV commercials. I never met him nor was I ever asked to meet him. Lyndon LaRouche’s U.S. presidential campaigns were controversial, to say the least. That even warranted SNL to do a skit on him. Nevertheless, the powers that be used the law to imprison him to stop the political ads. In October 1986, hundreds of state and federal officers raided LaRouche offices in Virginia and Massachusetts. A federal grand jury indicted LaRouche and 12 associates on credit card fraud and obstruction of justice; the charges alleged that they had attempted to defraud people of millions of dollars, including several elderly people, by borrowing money they did not intend to repay.

Borrowing money with no initial intent to pay anything back is a mental crime. You do not have to actually commit it. This is a THOUGHT crime like going to a bank to borrow money and then claiming you do not intend to pay off the debt. But this is how the law works – it is a mental thought that they prove by innuendo, circumstantial evidence, and it becomes does the jury BELIEVE it is more likely or not that there was no intent. We could lock up most of Congress and the White House using these theories. They borrow every year with no intention to pay anything back.

LaRouche was sentenced to prison. Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark joined the defense team for two appeals, writing that the case involved “a broader range of deliberate and systematic misconduct and abuse of power over a longer period of time in an effort to destroy a political movement and leader, than any other federal prosecution in my time or to my knowledge.” There was no question that LaRouche was prosecuted politically. I may not have agreed with his leftist political ideas, but he was nonetheless politically prosecuted.

I have been told in phone calls over the past few months that the powers that be want to convince Trump NOT to run in 2024. They regard Trump as a man of the people and that is not a good thing for the way governments want to control our lives.

This is what you get with a corrupt government. They will always use the criminal law to go after people they try to discredit ultimately to influence elections.