Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics
Re-Posted Nov 26, 2017 by Martin Armstrong
The Washington Post has no problem with a Special Prosecutor investigating Trump and any attempt to stop that would be a crime known as Obstruction of Justice. Yet, when it comes to Hillary, they do a backflip and have the audacity to write: “The Justice Department’s declaration that Attorney General Jeff Sessions is considering appointing a special counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton in response to demands by Republicans should alarm anyone who cares about the independence of the department.” So if a Special Prosecutor is “justice” going after Trump and suddenly an abuse of power to investigate Hillary, to even take such a position seems to be the pinnacle of journalistic corruption.
Reuters reported that Senate Republicans acknowledged that their investigation of Hillary Clinton’s role in approving a deal to sell U.S. uranium mines to a Russian company hinges in part on the testimony of a secret informant in a bribery and extortion scheme inside the same company.
I have reported that there was a prior FBI investigation that uncovered bribery in that uranium deal. FBI gathered evidence confirming that there was bribery that took place for Russia to get the uranium deal. Loretta Lynch refused to investigate her own administration. Hillary keeps saying those allegations have been debunked. But that was by Loretta Lynch. Comey never recorded Hillary’s “interview” before the FBI to ensure she could never be charged. That is CONTRARY to every process. The only time the FBI does that is to prevent a prosecution.
With all the ranting going on, why not a Special Prosecutor to once and for all indict or exonerate Hillary? To bad mouth, this as some dictatorship against her is just more of the same. If she really has nothing to hide, she and the Democrats should welcome such an investigation for posterity.