Tag Archives: Lobbyists take the law and find politicians to support it

Mar 16 2024

Episode 3466: MAGA Takes On The Supreme Court And Voter Integrity


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Mar 15, 2024 at 08:45 pm EST

Mar 16 2024

Soul of a Nation


Posted originally on Mar 16, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Marx Religion Opium of Masses

QUESTION: You have said that a nation’s true wealth is not its gold but its people. Would you say that what makes the people different from nation to nation is their customs and culture? Is Soros’s Open Society destroying civilization by opening borders and undermining our culture? He is doing what Marx did and has no respect for people’s culture and beliefs.

GS

ANSWER: Soros is absolutely destroying our civilization. The Democrats are cheering this idea of open borders to retain power. Allowing all of these people without skills to vote for them is declaring war against the very people they are supposed to represent. This idea is crushing real Americans/Europeans just to retain power with no concept of the damage to our civilization long-term. I should be able to vote in the European elections, and they should vote in ours if citizenship no longer means anything.

Huxley

Our very identity and culture are rooted in our beliefs in every nation. That is what constitutes the very soul of a nation. This is what Soros is destroying. He is carrying out exactly what Karl Marx did for the Communists. The founders of the United Nations saw individualism as evil. They look down upon us like bugs to be stepped on if we do not comply.

Every nation’s soul harbors its people’s character, and the nation’s welfare lies in that character. That is why Marx got it all wrong. He called religion the “opium of the people.” He failed to comprehend history and only looked at wealth as the socialists do today in his footsteps. But there is so much more. People act based on what they believe. Socialists do not believe in God, for, like Marx, they believe they know what is best in how society should function. They are against individualism and personal rights. That is what WOKEISM truly is – the denial of personal rights to achieve EQUALITY, as was the case under Communism. The words mother and father are now offensive. Communism taught that the state was your parent – not your biological parent. Every civilization that has traveled that path has collapsed in utter pain. Its people are torn apart, children turn against parents, and brother against brother, until society crumbles to dust and exists no more.

Tutankamun Coffin

The Egyptians went to great lengths to preserve the body after death because they, too, believed in the resurrection – the story of Osirus. When the jackals would dig up the grave and devour the dead body, the people feared that they would be robbed of returning for the last judgment. So the priests decreed that if the body did not survive, the soul could enter an image of itself, which would come to life. So Egypt became a culture with many statues that have survived, in addition to mummified bodies, because of that religious belief.

The Celts would fight fiercely because they, too, believed in reincarnation. If they died, so be it. They would be reborn. That religious belief dictated their behavior.

Hercules

The cult of Hercules, the son of Zeus, had been sent to Earth to help mankind. Because of that key BELIEF, Christianity was able to spread, for it was a familiar story of God sending his son to help mankind.

Christian Persecution

Because the barbarians were storming the gates of Rome, most Romans BELIEVED that the gods were angry because the Christians would not participate in community prayers and sacrifice to save the empire. That is why the Christian persecutions began because they offended the gods. So again, it was all driven by BELIEF.

Mexicans are hard-working, family-oriented, and generally deeply religious. But the vast majority of people pouring into the country are NOT Mexicans. Countries are tempting their prisons and sending them to America. Drug Cartels are charging $10,000 per ticket to get you into the USA. The majority are now coming from Africa and Asia – not from Mexico.

Soros one world government

I traded against Soros many times. I can confirm that I probably cost him at least $3 billion or more. Had I known this was what he would have done with his money, I would have been more aggressive.

1999 Solor loses 4 7 1999
NYT Soros_s_Quantum_Fund_lost 2 billion
Armstrong Wealth of Nation

I have studied every civilization to ascertain what makes one rise and another fall. I went behind the Berlin Wall before it fell and witnessed the real horror of Marxism and the suppression of human individuality. Soros’ Open Society is against EVERYTHING that civilization is constructed upon. It leads to the decline and fall of the West, and I believe historians will remember him as a major factor in the collapse of Western Society. We must come to see the destruction that Soros has unleashed upon the entire world and learn how to rebuild after 2032 a society that respects the rise and fall of civilization. We are plagued by handing power to someone who then thinks they are god and are qualified to redesign society and human nature.

2032 Sixth Wave
Mar 16 2024

Tucker Carlson Interviews Senator Rand Paul About The TikTok Ban Law – HR7521


Posted originally on the CTH on March 15, 2024 | Sundance 

Tucker Carlson gives a good preliminary outline showcasing the hypocritical argument being used against the social media platform TikTok and the auspices of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) expansion and influence in America.  Carlson walks through some of the current aspects of Chinese ownership and influence in the USA and then asks why is TikTok the focus of concern.

Rand Paul then joins Carlson to discuss the specific details of HR7521 and the interests of Washington DC as espoused.  Toward the end of their conversation, Rand Paul does a good job framing the issue around the global cleaving we have discussed at length here.  Senator Paul doesn’t specifically connect the dots clearly, but his larger point about where he sees this approach going is correct.  The global cleaving, which was triggered by Western sanctions against Russia, is a very real phenomena despite people denying it is taking place.  WATCH:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=TGlwmNb9SWU%3Ffeature%3Doembed

.

Breeauna Sagdal – “Once you realize that TikTok and its parent company Bytedance have been working WITH the Biden Administration and CFIUS for the last three years to become compliant, once you realize that On January 19, 2021, one day before President Biden assumed office, the US Department of Commerce (Commerce) published an interim final rule implementing its sweeping new authority to block, unwind, or condition “transactions” involving information and communications technology and services (ICTS), once you realize that TikTok’s servers are in Texas, and then understand that the company already has an American board, and has already turned over ALL records of shareholders to the satisfaction of our federal government – then you start to understand the REAL target isn’t TikTok – it’s YOU via “X,” Rumble, Gettr, Crypto, and so on down the line of non-compliant, divergent thought, content hubs and decentralized financial mechanisms.”

Don’t think it’s possible? I have news for you. All it takes is an Executive Order declaring a National Security threat exists and invoking IEEPA (economic sanctions), like the Biden Administration did on Feb. 28, 2024—days before H.R 7521 passed out of the House. The seizure or freezing of assets can happen WHILE an investigation is being conducted, AND all an investigation requires is mere hearsay, or a small amount of evidence such as this below, in order to begin.

And so here we are. This is how it starts, saying the quiet parts out loud and laying the foundation for what comes neXt—the truth behind “the so-called TikTok ban” (H.R 7521). Because, the ultimate and uncomfortable truth is that the Free Market is the enemy of stakeholder capitalism, and stakeholder capitalism IS Economic Fascism!!! A system that exists to financially starve out dissenters, and those who fund “them” as opposed to “us.”  (SOURCE) 

{GO DEEP}

Mar 15 2024

Mainstream News is Committing Suicide


Posted Mar 15, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 
Gallup 2022 Americans_Trust_In_Media_Remains_Near_Record_Low

Virtually everyone I talk to thinks mainstream news is just propaganda. COVID drove a spike through the very heart and soul of the First Amendment. Even five years later, people generally respected the news. COVID appears to have been the death knell to mainstream news. This chart shows the results of Gallip[ Polls], and the trust in American media is down well below 40%. Our models warn that when confidence in government falls below 40%, governments begin to collapse.

walter_kronkite_1960s on TV News

Last October, the Pew Research Center reported that Americans follow the news less closely than they used to. I remember growing up, and my father and mother would first watch the nightly news, and then the shows would come on. Never did I ever hear my father call the news fake or propaganda. Indeed, back in 2016, 51% of American adults surveyed indicated that they do so “all or most of the time.” That number dropped to 38% in 2022.

According to Pew, we are witnessing the complete collapse of trust in media across gender, age, education, ethnicity, and party affiliation. The collapse is greater among Republicans and even independents, dropping from 57% to 37%. Among Democrats, trust has declined from 49% to 42%.

2032 Sixth Wave

Those who know my research are quite familiar with the process of a decline in the CONFIDENCE of government, and this is a Private War that peaks in 2032. During a private wave, we see people distrusting the government and moving to the private sector, so things like the stock market and real estate have risen because capital is moving from government bonds to private assets. The collapse in the media is part of this cycle. The media aligned with the government during the communist era – PRAVDA. While the name meant “truth” in Russia, the people knew it was all just propaganda. We now find ourselves heading in the same direction. The media will fall with the government as it did under communism.

Lenin on Press
Mar 15 2024

HR7521 – TikTok Ban Assurances and Those Who Remember Patriot Act Assurances


Posted originally on the CTH on March 14, 2024 | Sundance 

Serendipitously, or not – depending on who you talk to, I was previously scheduled to be in DC at the moment of inflection for the passage of HR7521, the proverbial “TikToK Ban Law.”   Allow me to encapsulate the issues and present the point of those who say there is nothing to worry about.

First, the context that should matter (it doesn’t because the USIC are in charge here) is that every element that preceded the passage of the Patriot Act is being duplicated in the passage of the TikTok ban.  Which is to say, everyone is deferring to this ridiculous need to support USA National Security.

We The People have been burned by this approach before, yet so many refuse to see the similarity.

Second, the essential shield for those who support the bill [READ HR7521] comes down to the term “Foreign Adversary”, which is defined in the bill as Russia, China, North Korea and Iran.  As they make the case, TikTok ban advocates cite the content or platform of the issue must originate from, and/or be controlled by, a foreign adversary…. so quit worrying.

However, the legislative language cites Foreign Adversary Controlled Application (FACA), which applies to content providers, apps, websites, social media and hosting platforms.  This is where things get sketchy, because “under the direction of” is language that is included in the legislation, and the determinations of “at the direction of” are made by the Attorney General.

If the content, platform, website, or social media app generates content that is considered a national security threat, and providing information therein that is deemed to be under the control of a “foreign adversary,” it is the content within, not necessarily the platform ownership itself, that transfers compliance inquiry to the U.S government (DOJ Attorney General) for definitions.

If, for example, a U.S. company (think Twitter or CTH) is deemed to be providing information that is controlled by Russia, or actors who participate in the platform content on behalf of Russia (expand your FARA thinking here), then the U.S. or non-Foreign Adversary designation, may result in review subject to the terms of service as created and defined by the DOJ. In this example, the “Foreign Adversary” designation is simply a nose under the tent.

The DOJ, through this act, essentially becomes the overarching determination of terms of service (TOS) that can supersede the TOS of the platform or website.  Want to fight the definition or determination… prepare to spend big money fighting a battle exclusively in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, as that’s the only place you can appeal the determination of the govt.

As multiple people on the Fox News conservative side of the equation, and a host of seemingly oddly trusting voices who have previously presented themselves in alignment with common principles of freedom, all seem to accept the government would never weaponize this authority.  THAT, I find frustratingly odd.

All of the totalitarians (bad people) support this bill, and almost all of the popular conservative voices seemingly agree with them.  Color me frustrated.

I do not wish this post to be a bookmark for the time when “Itoldyasos” hold weight; but at this point, it seems like this is the only value in discussion.  Too many people on both sides of the political continuum are in favor of HR7521 to seemingly stop it.  Now it’s up to the Senate, who will find a way to make money from it and then support it.

Despite my pointing out that Joe Biden previously indicated how he would define these terms; [A conspiracy minded reviewer of the HR 7521 language should look at EXECUTIVE ORDER  14034] my reference point was met with crossed-eyes and the customary look as if a cow just licked them on the face.

(c)  The term “country of concern” means any foreign government that, as determined by the Attorney General pursuant to section 2(c)(iii) or 2(f) of this order, has engaged in a long-term pattern or serious instances of conduct significantly adverse to the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States persons, and poses a significant risk of exploiting bulk sensitive personal data or United States Government-related data to the detriment of the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States persons, as specified in regulations issued by the Attorney General pursuant to section 2 of this order.

(Section 7 definitions, item (C) – LINK Feb, ’24)

Look, I’m not nuts… and I understand how these silos of contained information work.  That citation above, was created before HR-7521 was in the public psyche.  What is cited above is part of a Biden intent to “Protect Americans’ Sensitive Data from Foreign Adversaries,” and it was updated about six weeks ago.

It is almost “as if” that executive order was updated purposefully to be used in combination with HR7521.   I think it was. However, DC-minded people think I am crazy for using that citation as part of the argument about how the DOJ will define the terms in the TikTok law.

From my perspective, the two issues [HR7521 and XO 14043] are directly related.  They both apply to the exact same issue. I believe that recent executive order was created by people behind the Biden administration who were proactively positioning themselves in advance of the new legal authority that was going to be provided by congress in the TikTok ban.  But everyone tells me I’m crazy and asks, “How the F**K did you remember that?”

♦ If you look at HR7521 from the position of intent to control online information (not data collection), and if you take a more cynical view of how HR7521 is purposefully vague, and if you overlay how XO-14043 lays out the definitions that Biden will use, then you might find yourself more in agreement with my concerns.

♦ If you do not look at it that way, then yes – CTH is a crazy conspiracy website with a track record of predicting outcomes from a crazy conspiratorial point of view.  Exactly the type of website that must be under the influence of a foreign adversary, an independent way of looking at the constructs of government that end up manifesting later in our reality.

I digress.

On the intent of the TikTok ban law, everyone pretends to forget the Patriot Act intent; I don’t.

For a tldr summary; watch the video in this TWEET

Mar 14 2024

Ep 3303b – D’s Want Congress To Refuse Certification When Trump Wins, Conditions Met, MI In Control


Posted originally on Rumble By X 22 Report on: Mar 11, 2024 at 8:45 pm EST

Mar 14 2024

Episode 3459: How To Stop The Border Invasion


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Mar 13, 2024 at 01:30 pm EST

Mar 14 2024

The US Border SLOWLY Becoming a Bipartisan Issue


Posted originally on Mar 14, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

LakenRiley

The US border crisis is slowly, very slowly, becoming a bipartisan issue for the government. Blue cities and states have pleaded for help in recent months as crime rises and their budgets implode. Still, the majority of Democrats have not broken rank with their party regarding the border crisis. The House recently voted to implement national security measures, and while all 212 Republicans voted in favor, 193 Democrats voted against any attempt to secure the border.

Thirteen members (7 Republicans and 6 Democrats) did not vote, which means 14 Democrats were brave enough to break rank and side with the people. Democrats in favor of national security include Reps. Don Davis (D-NC), Jared Moskowitz (D-FL), Yadira Caraveo (D-CO), Angie Craig (D-MN), Henry Cuellar (D-TX), Sharice Davids (D-KS), Jared Golden (D-ME), Steven Horsford (D-NV), Greg Landsman (D-OH), Susie Lee (D-NV), Frank Mrvan (D-IN), Mary Peltola (D-AK), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA), and Eric Sorensen (D-IL).

The GOP-led House has been met with fierce opposition from Schumer’s Democrat-led Senate that is hell-bent on securing blue votes through open border policies. The House had even voted for the impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas after he permitted the invasion of America, but the Senate stopped that from happening. The House is asking for the absolute bare minimum in terms of border security, such as prohibiting violent offenders from re-entering America and ensuring that migrants are held to the standard of law as American citizens.

Henry Cuellar of Texas is attempting to garner support for border security within his party. “I have always believed that Democrats can be strong on border security while also respecting the rights of migrants to claim asylum,” he published on social media. Rep. Colin Allred (D-Dallas) agreed with Cuellar and criticized his party for permitting crime ahead of the election. “The cynicism of saying that I don’t want to pass a package that will help us address a problem because I want to run on that in November is unacceptable,” Alred boldly stated.

Congress has passed more laws and provided more funding for Ukraine’s border than America’s. What the Democrats do not understand is that their voter base is beginning to realize the severity of the immigrant crisis. A Pew Research study from February 2024 found that 73% of Democrats believe the government is not doing a good job handling the border crisis. However, significantly more Democrats than Republicans think people are entering our nation illegally for better opportunities. The majority of Democrats do not want to build a wall nor do they believe immigration should be curbed, rather, they believe there should be more opportunities for people to legally enter the nation. Soon they will see that is simply not feasible economically or socially.

Slowly but surely, those who vehemently deny the crisis at the US-Mexico border will begin to see the crisis unfold before their eyes. The Democrats will not break rank unless they believe their voter base will support their policies.

Mar 13 2024

Special Counsel Robert Hur Testifies Elements of Biden and Trump Classified Documents Cases are Identical, But Biden Mental Acquity Made “Intent” Element Difficult


Posted originally on the CTH on March 12, 2024 | Sundance 

Regarding the handling of ‘classified documents’ Special Counsel Robert Hur testified today that President Trump and Vice-President Biden had identical outcomes.  However, whereas Donald Trump is cognitively normal, Joe Biden is suffering from a diminished mental state, frequent confusion and absent remembering.  Therefore, the elements needed for “intent” in the criminal statute did not apply to Biden.

Donald Trump is fine; Joe Biden has lost his marbles.  According to prosecutor Robert Hur, that explains why there are two tiers of justice amid an identical set of infractions.  As a consequence, the American people are expected to be okay with the reasoning for a DOJ double-standard.  WATCH:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=wuSZ4CX5DMQ%3Ffeature%3Doembed

.

The full hearing video is below, but the essential element is just repeated.   (1) Biden lied or could not remember on purpose; and (2) there are two tiers of justice, and the DOJ is prepared to defend their non-prosecution decision based entirely on cognitive “intent.”

FULL HEARING:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=w226wkLh8mI%3Ffeature%3Doembed

.

.

ps. People might be critical of CTH not necessarily posting some of the relevant material of any specific news day.  The criticism is fair and well received.  Thank you. However, please understand that while I never talk about what is happening behind the scenes, more than 50% of my daily awake time is now spent in consultant conversation with those in positions of influence who need their spear tips sharpened.  I am happily and purposefully breaking down the silo walls.  All good is happening according to His plan, not mine.

Love to all,

~ Sundance

Mar 13 2024

HR7521 – The TikTok Ban Law (as written) is NOT About Banning TikTok, It’s About Information Control – pdf Included


Posted originally on the CTH on March 12, 2024 | Sundance

I swear by all that I know to be righteous and accurate, the combined willpower of the UniParty in Washington DC is not targeting TikTok from the perspective of concern over data collection.  Instead, the DC system -which is to say the USIC- is using the auspices of TikTok to expand the reach of government censorship and control information.

This is a domestic information space battle, using the guise of TikTok as a baseline for justification.  How do we know? You only need to look at the mechanism of the law as it is written, the compliance section, and the definitions they are using to see they are not targeting data collection.  [pdf of HR7521 HERE]

If TikTok data collection was the issue, the law would be structured to ban foreign data collection.  That’s not what this is.  This is a law written to give the Executive Branch the power to define any platform as “foreign owned” by the service provider (even if domestic) and the substance of the content contained and/or distributed.  This has to be stopped.

[Source pdf, Page 8 – HR7521]

Read the law as written through the prism of “Information Control,” not the prism of data collection.  The law is designed to control information, not data collection.

As readers are well aware, the USIC is in alignment (I would say control) with almost all U.S-based social media platforms.  This is why/how DHS is operating in synergy with those same systems.  This is also the motive behind the mis-dis-mal-information definitions.  Ultimately, if you stand back and look at what is being done, you see the concern of the U.S. government is not data collection, its information control.

The TikTok ban, authorized by a duplicious Legislative branch, is expanding the ability of the Executive branch to control information.  Just as The Patriot Act was not about targeting terrorism, but really about domestic surveillance; so too is the TikTok ban not about foreign data collection, it’s about information control.

Again, read the law as written and you can clearly see this is a law created to authorize the agencies of the government to control information.  Silence is the same as consent in the face of oppression.  Do not be silent.