DNI Ric Grenell Declassifying Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts: “The IC doesn’t have all the transcripts/summaries….it wasn’t our product”…


Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard “Ric” Grenell announced today he is in the process of declassifying the transcripts of the calls between Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

Within a twitter response by Grenell, part of the riddle behind the transcripts gets a little more clarity: “The IC doesn’t have all the transcripts/summaries…. it wasn’t our product.”

The implication here is the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) did not generate one of the transcripts; that evolved into an FBI equity, and was later used in their case against Lt. General Michael Flynn. The December 29, 2016, intercept was not exclusive to the U.S. intelligence apparatus, and the call summary became proprietary to the FBI; the agency exploiting the underlying content.

This makes sense and explains how the FBI was able to manipulate the framework of the call and keep the remaining U.S. intelligence system away from their internal plan.

There was more than one phone call and conversation between Flynn and Kislyak.  Some immediately after the election and in/around mid-December 2016.  Reports of those contacts and communications WERE in the U.S. IC network and those reports led to unmasking requests.  However, the specific December 29th communication was not an exclusive intercept of the U.S. intelligence community and therefore easier for the FBI to shape.

When Susan Rice, and now all of the downstream politicians, are requesting the release of the Flynn-Kislyak transcripts, those specific demands do not encompass the Dec.29th call; and it appears from the political narrative being assembled, the democrats do not necessarily expect DNI Grenell to be able to release the transcript of that specific call.

Example:

DNI Ric Grenell is signaling that he intends to release all the call transcripts not just the ones obtained by U.S. intelligence intercepts.

The “CR cuts” are summaries of the intercepted communication and therefore subject to being manipulated or shaped by the FBI official doing the summary.  The call summary is subject to interpretation and shaping much like a 302 report would be.  However, Grenell doesn’t just want to release the FBI summary, he wants to release the full transcript.

This approach by Grenell seems to confirm what we have been assembling about the transcripts, the “CR cuts”, and how the FBI used them.

There are intercepted communications between Flynn-Kislyak that were part of the ongoing FBI investigation of Flynn and monitoring of Russian interests.  Those intercepts became reports, and within those reports Flynn was masked; and later unmasked by political operatives.

However, the specific December 29, 2016, call while Flynn was in the Dominican Republic was a third party intelligence intercept; transferred to the FBI exclusively as part of their counterintelligence operation.  That 12/29/16 intercept generated proprietary FBI “CR cuts” or summaries of that intercepted communication specific to the FBI investigation.  That call content remained outside the larger intelligence community.  Hence Grenell saying: “The IC doesn’t have all the transcripts/summaries…. it wasn’t our product.”

But Grenell is working to bring that specific FBI equity (call transcript) into the IC and release it -in total- along with all other transcripts that were already within the control of the IC; thus Grenell gives an honest presentation of the totality of the contact, not just the parts that have been manipulated and shaped by officials in their targeting of Flynn.

Combine what Grenell is doing along with the announcement by FBI Director Chris Wray today, to review FBI action in the Flynn investigation, and a more fulsome picture emerges.

As many have long suspected the FBI shaped the December 29, 2016, call content; the FBI biased interpretation of what took place on that call; specifically to target Flynn.  They were able to do this, in part, because they exclusively held the evidence they were shaping.

With U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen now reviewing the background evidence, and with DNI Ric Grenell declassifying and releasing the underlying documents, the truth is being pushed to the surface….

 

Devin Nunes Discusses ‘Spygate’, Flynn and Obama-Era Intelligence Corruption….


HPSCI ranking member Devin Nunes appears on Lou Dobbs to discuss some of the most recent revelations about Obama-era political surveillance operations; and the downstream effort by career participants to cover it up.

.

If you read last night’s discussion on the origin of Crossfire Hurricane vis-a-vis Papadopoulos; and if you read Lee Smith’s article today on why Obama’s system, writ large, was apoplectic about Flynn;… consider the possibility that Joseph Mifsud was an Obama-aligned Israeli intelligence operative. What would that mean?

DC Circuit Panel Orders Judge Sullivan To Respond Within 10 Days…


A three panel DC Appeals Court Panel, Judge Henderson, Judge Wilkins and Judge Rao have ordered Michael Flynn’s Judge, Emett Sullivan, to respond to the defense petition for a writ of mandamus within ten days:

Quoting the U.S. vs Fokker ruling the panel is not responding directly to the Flynn petition with an immediate decision; instead they are requiring Judge Sullivan to explain his decision to engage with extra-party amicus actions despite the DOJ and Flynn defense agreement on the motion to dismiss.

The order can be viewed as a smart move by the appeals panel because Judge Sullivan has yet to rule on the original unopposed DOJ motion. In essence, Sullivan has never explained himself; and this approach will require Sullivan to put his proverbial cards on the table.  The DC panel has given Judge Sullivan ten days to respond.

Advertisements

Barr’s Exposés of Susan Rice, Cutting Obama Off At The Knees


Some day, the bones Barr unearthed about Rice will lead directly back to Obama and his wobbly House of Cards

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 20, 2020

Barr’s Exposés of Susan Rice, Cutting Obama Off At The Knees

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton and Fox Business’ Lou Dobbs should cut Attorney General William Barr a break in saying he does not expect an investigation into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a ‘criminal investigation’  of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden.

Exposing former UN Ambassador and National Security Advisor 
Susan Rice for the consummate liar that she is, is, in effect, cutting Obama and Biden down at the knees.

Liars don’t change their pants even when they’re on fire

Susan Rice not only knows where all the Obama skeletons were buried—she actually buried all the skeletons—including the Trump Inauguration Day memo she wrote to herself.

How is it even possible that Rice knew nothing about an email memo she studiously wrote to herself?

This little gem unearthed by investigative AG Barr will ultimately lead to the downfall of Obama’s FBI-weaponized House of Cards.

Give Barr some time and space to unearth those skeletons leading to the Obama downfall, gentlemen!

Susan Rice was Obama’s liar-in-chief long before she wrote that memo to herself on inauguration day, 2017.

It was a Barr-exposed Rice who provided cover for both Obama and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the Benghazi tragedy—making five televised appearances with rat-a-tat lies that protests and an obscure anti-Muslim video were the cause for American loss of life in the Benghazi boondoggle.

Liars don’t change their pants even when they’re on fire:

Obama’s FBI-weaponized House of Cards

“Just weeks ago, Rice in promoting her new book, was lamenting how she was sent out in place of Clinton to cover Benghazi, at the White House’s request: (Canada Free Press, Oct. 29, 2019)

“Where is Hillary Clinton? (Fox News, Oct. 8, 2019)

“That was the question then-U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice’s mother asked when she told her she would be appearing on all five Sunday morning political shows on Sept. 16, 2012 — just five days after the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

“I smell a rat,” her mother said. “This is not a good idea. Can’t you get out of it?” (Fox News)

“The exchange was detailed in Rice’s new book, “Tough Love: My Story of the Things Worth Fighting For,” as she recalled what led to and what fueled the biggest political controversy of her government career.

Trump’s accusation that then-President Barack Obama had “wiretapped”

As recently as last year Rice came out in a huff all because President Donald Trump did not inform Obama about the coming al-Baghdadi take down.(Canada Free Press, Oct. 29, 2019)

“A three-year-old interview clip of former National Security Adviser Susan Rice resurfaced Tuesday after the declassified email she sent to herself on the final day of the Obama administration was released. (Fox News, May 19, 2020 )

“During an April 2017 appearance on PBS News Hour, Rice was asked about the then-breaking revelations about members of President Trump’s transition team having been surveilled before he took office.

“In the last few hours, we’ve been following a disclosure by the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes, that in essence, during the final days of the Obama administration, during the transition after President Trump had been elected, that he and the people around him may have been caught up in surveillance of foreign individuals and their identities may have been disclosed. Do you know anything about this?” PBS anchor Judy Woodruff asked.

“I know nothing about this,” Rice said at the time. “I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today.”
“Rice then pivoted to Trump’s accusation that then-President Barack Obama had “wiretapped” him during the 2016 election, insisting that “nothing of the sort occurred.”

“She later insisted that “no president, no White House can order the surveillance of another American citizen. That can only come from the Justice Department with the approval of a FISA court.”

“However, the newly released email appeared to indicate Rice had knowledge of the surveillance that took place that led to the “unmasking” of then-incoming National Security Adviser (NSA) Michael Flynn from his communications with the then-Russian ambassador.

“The email, which was written on Jan. 20, 2017, documented a Jan. 5 Oval Office meeting with then-President Obama and others, during which he provided guidance on how law enforcement needed to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race. Parts of it were released previously, but the section on then-FBI Director James Comey’s response had been classified as “TOP SECRET” until now.

“Comey suggested to Obama that the National Security Council (NSC) might not want to pass “sensitive information related to Russia” to Flynn, according to a newly declassified email that Flynn’s predecessor sent herself on Inauguration Day.

“The section showed that Comey affirmed to Obama he was proceeding “by the book,” and went on to discuss concerns about Flynn’s known conversations with Russia’s ambassador at the time—conversations that would play a role later in the criminal case against Flynn.

“Rice continued in her email: “From a national security perspective, Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador [Sergey] Kislyak. Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information. President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn.”

“Rice then wrote: “Comey replied, ‘potentially.’ He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that ‘the level of communication is unusual.’”

“In a statement Tuesday evening about the email’s release, a representative for Rice stressed that “no discussion of law enforcement matters or investigations took place, despite accusations to the contrary.” The spokeswoman also insisted the Obama administration did not change the way it briefed Flynn, saying Rice briefed Flynn for more than 12 hours on four separate occasions during the transition.

“Ambassador Rice did not alter the way she briefed Michael Flynn on Russia as a result of Director Comey’s response,” representative Erin Pelton said.

“Last week, a list of top Obama officials who had requested the “unmasking” of Flynn was released. The list included Comey, former Vice President Joe Biden, former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power and former White House chief-of-staff Denis McDonough.”

Meanwhile, until Barr went out on his digging-up-skeletons tour, all lies told by Rice had been conveniently buried.

Some day, the bones Barr unearthed about Rice will lead directly back to Obama and his wobbly House of Cards.

Go Bill Barr, go!

My Administration was SCANDAL FREE!


“The Treason Snake”

Obama likes to tout that his administration was mostly ’scandal free.’ That’s another lie from His Fraudship. Barack is desperate to protect his legacy while President Trump has been dismantling it.Now we are seeing clearly what our first black, marxist, gay and Muslim president has been up to: Treason. Obama, a creation of the Deep State, colluded at the highest levels. He helped to organize a coup d’état to ensure crooked Hillary was elected. She was going to complete the destruction of our Republic that Obama had started—all in order to usher in their tyrannical, globalist vision. Thankfully, Trump was elected and prevented that catastrophe.

I’ve listed many of the foul deeds and scandals perpetrated by Obama, whose real daddy was Frank Marshall Davis, a famous communist in Hawaii. Not convinced? Take a look at this InfoWars video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRk3Vqb-o-c

He even sounds like Davis, who also Barak’s ‘mentor.’ Obama’s grandfather was a CIA operative. The CIA helped Obama to slither into power. It’s no wonder Obama helped to further weaponize and politicize the security agencies to return the favor. The Deep State consolidated their power under his presidency. Along with the fake news media, they all tried to rig the election in favor of Hillary. They failed and now they’re doing their best to impeach Trump. They must not succeed.

I recommend “The Worst President in History, The Legacy of Barack Obama.” Written by Matt Margolis & Mark Noonan. The book lists 200 reasons why Barack was an incompetent, traitorous liar bent on destroying our country in order to usher in a globalist, socialist system. His attitude toward America is symbolized by his dirty shoes put up on the Oval Office desk. Do a search, “Obama with feet on desk” to see what I mean. Muslims consider shoes put in the face of another to be an insult. Obama is an insult to America.

—Ben Garrison

An Artist Looks At Joe Biden


Without the concerted efforts of a revitalized “Christian Conservatism” and the help of the real God in Heaven, this 2020 battle is over–and lost—before it starts

Dave Merrick image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 20, 2020

Joe Biden

Back in Bible days, when people were freaked out and wished to express shock (and, most often, indignation) at wrong things that were being done—things that went against the grain with God (what was then considered simply going against common sense)—the following behavioral ‘formula’ was how men of God made certain that their emotions and resolve were not hidden from the careless dummies around them. Here is just one of many examples found in Scripture. This is probably my favorite …

“When I heard this (stupid and/or blasphemous thing), I tore my tunic and cloak, pulled hair from my head and beard and sat down appalled” (Ezra 9:3 NIV). And the preceding debasing ritual was often followed by the donning of filthy rags (‘sackcloth’) for one’s clothing, and sprinkling ashes atop one’s head in an attempt to show even greater shame and humiliation.

‘Touchy-Feely’ Joe

In my heart, this is exactly where I find myself today as I write these words. I am in shock. I am in disbelief. I am incredulous. I am nauseated, [”… and my soul has been psychedelicized.” (Chambers Brothers, “Time Has Come Today” 1966).] Suffice it to say that this day everything is sufficiently crazy enough for me. I will begin to explain a little. Hope you will follow along.

Yesterday, on a huge and very popular social networking site, I saw a news piece featuring an awe-inspiring, absolutely riveting photograph of Joe Biden. Beneath that portrait of ‘Obiden’ was the announcement that national polls were suggesting that he had taken over Trump in a strong lead for the presidency in 2020. None of that headline really shocked me. After all, the source was naturally the lying-est former ‘news network’ of all the ‘big six’ liberal news media outlets out there. At any rate, they were—as they most usually do—brutally wresting reality into more momentum for their favored candidate, ‘touchy-feely’ Joe. Their declaring Joe the big leader was no surprise at all.

Besides writing articles like this, I am also a professional portrait artist—and not a bad one, if I do say so myself. I bring that up because a person’s face says everything to me. As I have said through the years in several interviews regarding my artwork, “The face is the body’s bottomless organ of expression. The face shows me what is going on inside a person’s heart.” And, “When I am doing a portrait of anyone, the painting or drawing is never done when the face ‘looks’ right. The piece is done when that face ‘FEELS’ right”—matching the heart and personality I have sensed in my meetings with those subjects.

The emerging communist Amerika

[One time, on one certain project, my client came in to pick up her family’s large and beautiful (I am humble as well.) painting. In that project I had done the senior couple (in their 70s). I had also painted their eight (four boys and four daughters-in-law) married children (in their late 30s – early 40s). And over a dozen grandchildren, youngsters of all ages, which filled up the houses of those families. I had painted all of the people casually standing and seated around my commissioner’s huge old, beautiful barn located on her high mountain ranch. As she was preparing to leave my studio with her treasure, I stopped her and asked, “What is wrong with this person, right here?” I pointed at one of the faces of the smiling crowd of children/grandchildren, and looked at her for an answer.

The woman’s eyes filled with tears and she asked, “What exactly do you mean?”  I told her, “I don’t really know. It’s just that every time I had to work on this face, my heart was breaking for that person.” My client sat down and began to weep. She began to explain her response. “That sweet person has some really deep psychological and spiritual problems, David. Currently and much of the time spent growing up, that dear one has never been too far away from committing suicide.” After that revealing exchange, we had some coffee, said some prayers, and she took her painting and went home. I have had similar experiences with a few of my clientele. It never fails. So why do I bring all that up? It is because I am offering you a bit of my qualifying credential as a judge of character.]

Since our 45th president has been in office, the rotten left—I can no longer dignify them by calling them ‘democrats’—has cast every sort of accusation and aspersion on the man, in an attempt to try to ruin his relationship with this great nation as well as furthering their ongoing efforts at demoralizing and undermining him personally. On occasion psychologists and psychiatrists have even been hired to down-judge President Trump simply through a supposed analysis of his various facial expressions and/or body language. It has been a shameless shuck, the way the emerging communist Amerika has gone after the best leader our nation has seen since Ronald Reagan (or maybe even Abraham Lincoln). I know that a lot of my liberal readers are right now entertained by my high marks for our president. And that is not because of much of anything else than the ridiculously insulting and critical picture the liberal media so constantly paints of him.

Joe’s lame attempt at looking like a man of integrity

Nevertheless, when I saw the almost reverend image of the reprobate Joe Biden, gracing that article yesterday, I truly wanted to rip at my hair, pluck my beard, rend my T-shirt, and dump ashes on my head. All my conservative Christian friends, most of them anyway, were busy posting recipes and jokes on their pages, respectively. And not one opposing comment had been registered – IN TWO DAYS – in response to ‘touchy-feely’ Joe’s lame attempt at looking like a man of integrity. And that is when everything began caving in, concerning my respect for the dummies around me who call themselves “Christian conservatives”.

I suddenly remembered that back in 2016, when I read the proud testimonies of the ‘Christian conservative’ morons who had actually voted for Hillary or had written in other preferences because their delicate sensitivities had prevented them from voting for “… that brash and rough mouthed Trump!” it was every bit as disgusting as the bumper stickers we had to stare at after Clinton was elected in 1992: “DON’T BLAME ME! I VOTED FOR ROSS!”

I remember listening to the story of the father, Charles Woods, who met his son Tyrone’s body – IN AN ALUMINUM BOX COMING HOME FROM BENGHAZI. Woods was standing there, silently hurting, when the stupid and classless Joe Biden came fumbling up behind him and asked, “Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?’’ Of course a liberal leaning Snopes rushes in to clean up as much damage as they can by labeling that story “UNDETERMINED”. But I saw Mr. Woods’ narrative in one of his interviews in a news clip. And that outraged father didn’t pause a moment in confirming numbskull Biden’s rude and disrespectful comment about his precious baby boy. That’s what made me even more amazed when the penetrating Joe Biden took issue with a reporter asking him (’ in front of God and everybody’) about Obiden’s son, Hunter’s problem with a young lady he apparently had impregnated and then purportedly abandoned. If memory serves – and it usually does – touchy-feely Joe told the inquiring journalist that he had no class in so heartlessly mentioning any of that at Joey’s precious little press conference. What a maroon. What an ultra-maroon.

When Biden is accused, Biden simply gets angry for being put on the spot

But here we are in an ugly 21st century. And right now the best a rotten DNC can offer a struggling America is what appears to be an anti-charismatic alleged pedophile who often doesn’t display enough mentality to power an autonomic nervous system. Joe Biden has given us volumes of the video showing him repeatedly violating personal spaces in the molestation and sniffing of innocent little girls – WHO VERY OBVIOUSLY DO NOT ENJOY HIS WANDERING FINGERS! And self-appointed kings and queens of morality—Pelosi, Clinton, Schiff, Schumer, etc., etc.—are currently lauding the man as a model of golden character.

Nancy Pelosi is obviously losing her mind. She said that president Trump is ‘morbidly obese.’ That statement in itself seriously calls into question Nancy’s powers of perception. Has she looked in a mirror lately? Because, again, as a portrait artist, Nancy looks morbidly ugly to me. I only mention that because her nonstop heartlessness has earned her the same sort of treatment coming back at her. She says she has no problem believing Joe’s denial of his alleged sexual abuse of Tara Reade. But she could not scream loud enough in attempting to ruin the life and career of one of our finest (our newest) Supreme Court Justices.

I saw the clip of Joe Biden’s kid-gloved interview on MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’, after he had been accused by Reade of sexual assault. I had to commend the first interviewer, ‘Mika’, who at times appeared to be holding Biden’s feet to the fire. She was trying to get Biden to at least admit the close comparisons of his most recent accuser’s insistence—that he sexually molested Tara Reade—to the accusations leveled toward Brett Kavanaugh by a completely different female accuser. Biden’s response was comedic. He visibly kept getting angry at Mika, huffing and sputtering as she was merely repeating Reade’s accusations. It got worse as Mika tried to understandably draw a comparison between where this was going with Biden and where it absolutely had gone in the merciless and fiery grilling that self-righteous Democrats gave Justice Kavanaugh.

It was interesting to note that while Justice Kavanaugh was tormented and vilified by democrats about an event that allegedly occurred while he was in high school, and about which no complaint was ever filed, Joe Biden is merely being questioned about an event that allegedly (I have to be fair here) occurred while he was a United States Senator and a fully mature man. The Biden incident was allegedly reported. Interestingly, had the allegations been true, and had Kavanaugh actually been charged with what was alleged, he would have been a minor, charged in juvenile court, and his record would have been sealed. With Biden the result would have been far different. But bottom line—when Kavanaugh was accused, Kavanaugh looked to bring forth evidence to vindicate himself. When Biden is accused, Biden simply gets angry for being put on the spot.

When I see Joe Biden’s posing to look like a saint, I see the insincerity of the devil himself.

But seriously, Americans: will you sit by this time, as you did during midterm elections and further allow our great nation to vaporize? Donald Trump needs our help like never before. America needs our help like never before. Will you rise to the occasion, and get Donald Trump safely past the devilish goblins of this coming election? You, conservative Christian, can you overlook some of his honest candor—some of his comparatively minor imperfections—and allow him to keep Western religion free? Will you humble yourself enough to reward his fight to save the unborn child?

When I look into Joe Biden’s face, I see the worst sort of evil dishonesty and carelessness fighting for his and his friends’ power and wealth. I see the sarcasm and denial needed in keeping alive the rankest sexism this nation will ever host. When I see Joe Biden’s posing to look like a saint, I see the insincerity of the devil himself. When I see Joe Biden, I see a constituency of ignorance deep enough to fully allow the worst sort of Trojan Horses to be pulled right into the very heart of this planet’s last bastion of hope and freedom. When I see Joe Biden, I see the unbridled power of a lying television and internet that have been used by the prince of darkness himself in order to dress up a slob like Biden, and take America down for its last gasp before it is forever silenced. When I see Biden’s face, I see nothing more than a conman.

When I see Donald Trump, I see the last brave shepherd boy we will ever find to stand before the giant now looking to destroy us. Trust this artist to know when this painting is truly finished. But without the concerted efforts of a revitalized “Christian Conservatism” and the help of the real God in Heaven, this 2020 battle is over—and lost—-before it starts.

Joe Biden

Republicans Don’t Dare Call It Treason


But in this upside-down world, in which Obama is accused of treason, and the Federal Reserve uses a China-friendly company to conduct business, Trump is once again made into a villain

Cliff Kincaid image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 19, 2020

Republicans Don't Dare Call It Treason

As more evidence emerges of the role played by former President Barack Hussein Obama in directing Russia-gate, President Donald J. Trump’s “allies” are leaving the field of battle. They seem not to want to hold Barack Hussein Obama responsible for what President Trump calls the “biggest political crime in American history, by far!”

First, Senator Lindsey Graham said he wouldn’t subpoena Obama to testify before his Judiciary Committee about Russia-gate. Then, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA,) stated that House Republicans have not made any criminal referrals for Obama or 2020 Democratic presidential candidate and Obama former Vice President Joe Biden relating to Russia-gate. Finally, Attorney General William Barr said he did not expect criminal probes of either Obama or Biden in the matter.

This is all we need to know about whether top Republicans in the House and Senate, and an Attorney General nominated by Republican President Trump, are serious about getting to the bottom of Russia-gate.

This is so despite the fact that progressive historian Eric Zuesse has written that Obama is in “severe legal jeopardy” because of his role in sabotaging the Trump Administration. He explains, “The biggest crime that a U.S. President can commit is to try to defeat American democracy (the Constitutional functioning of the U.S. Government) itself, either by working with foreign powers to take it over, or else by working internally within America to sabotage democracy for his or her own personal reasons.” In either case, he wrote, it’s treason.

“What we are watching is turning out to be traces of a plot against a government elected by the American people,” said Michael Hudson and Paul Craig Roberts about the role of various Obama officials in sabotaging the Trump Administration. They added, in a story that was published back in 2017, that, “Law requires Trump to arrest those responsible and to put them on trial for treason and conspiracy to overthrow the government of the United States.”

Here we are three years later and Graham, Nunes, and now Barr have not done anything to hold Obama personally responsible. They have failed to provide Trump with the legal basis on which to accuse Obama and others with treasonous conduct.

Left-wingers not beholden to the Democratic Party are willing to admit the obvious. Author Branko Marcetic calledthe targeting of Trump National Security Adviser Michael T. Flynn “a case of entrapment” and said the FBI “even used outright false claims to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page…” He concluded that the FBI and various US government agencies engaged in “prosecutorial overreach, entrapment, and the criminalization of foreign policy dissent” in the case of Russia-gate.

Trying to appeal to traditional liberals, he notes, “…the fact that the FBI’s misconduct was aimed at a right-wing government this time should be no reason for Democrats to dismiss the magnitude of the scandal.”

The magnitude of the scandal is what makes it treason. This was a direct assault on the American system of government that we now understand was based on a phony dossier, compiled by a former British spy, based on Russian disinformation.

Nunes wrote a book back in 2010, Restoring the Republic, but he has not followed through in the matter of holding Obama accountable. Graham frequently appears on the Fox News Sean Hannity show, posturing as a conservative, but he won’t call Obama to testify at his upcoming Russia-gate hearings. After Barr said he didn’t anticipate criminal charges against Obama or Biden, the conservative legal analyst, Andrew C. McCarthy, agreed that what Obama and Biden did “simply may not be criminal,” even though the Democrats’ may have  used counterintelligence powers “for partisan political purposes.”

Why the eagerness to let Obama off the hook?

Why the eagerness to let Obama off the hook? These inside-the-beltway politicians and commentators are afraid to use the word “treason.” They are failing the American people and their president.

In truth, Obama’s motives were two-fold. One, he wanted to disrupt the Trump Administration, making it impossible for Trump to govern and deal with real national security problems. Obama knew this would enable our enemies to gain an advantage over us. Second, he was afraid that the Trump Administration would use the resources of the government to investigate Obama’s own mysterious background and identity. As we argued in one of our Obama books, Comrade Obama Unmasked: Marxist Mole in the White House, “The smoking gun evidence of Barack Hussein Obama’s deep personal relationship with suspected Soviet espionage agent and Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis is the real Russia-gate scandal.”

At one of his press briefings, Trump was asked by the Washington Post’s Philip Rucker “What crime, exactly, are you accusing President Obama of committing and do you believe the Justice Department should prosecute him?”

“You know what the crime is,” Trump replied. “The crime is very obvious to everybody.” He added, “All you have to do is read the newspapers—except yours.”

The answer to the question is treason. It’s obvious.

But in this day and age, treason is not talked about.

To cite another example, consider the actions of the Federal Reserve in hiring the notorious firm BlackRock to help purchase billions of dollars in bonds and securities. At a Tuesday hearing, Senator Martha McSally asked chairman Jerome Powell why a firm like BlackRock, which invests in Chinese companies, had been hired for this purpose. He replied, in part: “All large asset managers buy Chinese securities. These are global asset managers—I’m not here to defend or criticize them for that, it’s just not really relevant to the work that we want them to do.”

It’s “not relevant” when a firm does business with a country and regime that unleashed this virus on the world? Why didn’t the Fed require Blackrock to divest from China? That’s precisely what the National Legal and Policy Center has asked the firm to do.

One of McSally’s concerns was whether the profits made by BlackRock would be used to buy more Chinese companies.

“Communist China should not be profiting off of unleashing this calamity on the world and that is something that should unite all Americans, even if they work at BlackRock,” she said.

Neil Cavuto, is attacking President Trump for using a drug he promoted, hydroxychloroquine

Powell apparently didn’t think that was “relevant.”

She noted that BlackRock’s website has a page titled “Five Myths and realities about investing in China,” and explained, “According to BlackRock, one of the biggest myths about China is that Chinese state-owned enterprises don’t control their economy, and BlackRock even tries to back that up with data—I won’t go into all of it, but it’s ridiculous.”

Speaking of the Chinese, in November of 2017, as Russia-gate was underway, Obama made a trip to Beijing, to have what was described as a “hush-hush” meeting with Chinese dictator Xi Jinping. They were described as “veteran cadres,” a term generally applied to retired Chinese Communist Party officials.

In the midst of all of this, a Fox News anchor, Neil Cavuto, is attacking President Trump for using a drug he promoted, hydroxychloroquine, in order to prevent coronavirus. His physician said the drug has potential and the risks are relatively low.

Rather than attack the president, he should be commended for practicing what he preaches. But in this upside-down world, in which Obama is accused of treason, and the Federal Reserve uses a China-friendly company to conduct business, Trump is once again made into a villain – and on a so-called “conservative” news channel.

Judicial Watch Receives Originating FBI “EC” Electronic Communication – The Start of Crossfire Hurricane…


The “EC” or electronic communication that started the July 31st counterintelligence operation was one of the original declassification requests from Devin Nunes original bucket list in 2018.   The EC has been declassified and Judicial Watch received it.

Originally the EC was presumed to be a CIA communication to the FBI detailing the need for a counterintelligence investigation; however, the EC as presented is originated by FBI Agent Peter Strzok and centers around George Papadopoulos.

This means Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign, was predicated based on gossip, innuendo and rumors related to George Papadopoulos.   The information was relayed by Australian Diplomat Alexander Downer.

(Judicial Watch) […] The redacted document details seeming third hand information that the Russian government “had been seeking prominent members of the Donald Trump campaign in which to engage to prepare for potential post-election relations should Trump be elected U.S. President.” The document also alleges Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, claimed to an unnamed party that “they (the Russians) could assist the Trump campaign with the anonymous release of information during the campaign that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton.” (more)

The EC is below:

If we take the CTH timeline on George Papadopoulos it will help to assemble the picture of what took place:

♦Early Feb. 2016 After leaving the campaign of Ben Carson, George Papadopoulos joins London Center for International Law Practice (LCILP)

♦Mid March, 2016, Papdopoulos travels to Rome as part of LCILP role. During visit Papadopoulos introduced to Joseph Mifsud. Mifsud introduced as professor for London Academy for Diplomacy, London England.

♦March 17,2016, Papadopoulos returns to London.

♦March 21, 2016, President Trump names Papadopoulos amid list of foreign policy advisors, with focus on energy sector.

♦March 24, 2016, Papadopoulos meets Mifsud in London. Mifsud accompanied by Olgya Polonskya who Mifsud introduced as former student/Putin niece. [sketchy]

♦March 31, 2016, Trump campaign foreign policy team meeting, Washington DC. Trump International Hotel. [famous table photograph with Papadopoulos, Sessions, Trump]

♦Early April, 2016, Mifsud continues contact w/ Papadopoulos via email. Ms. Polonskya also emailing Papadopoulos; however, later discovered Mifsud actually writing Polonskya emails. Papadopoulos returns to London, U.K.

♦April 11, 2016, Mifsud emails Papadopoulos about his own upcoming travel to Russia. Suggests meeting for following day, April 12.

♦April 12, 2016, Papadopoulos and Mifsud meet at Andaz Hotel in London, U.K. This meeting is in advance of Mifsud traveling to Russia.

♦April 18, 2016, Mifsud emails Papadopoulos from Russia. Introduces Ivan Timofeev.

♦April 25, 2016, Mifsud returns to London after stopover in Rome.

♦April 26, 2016, Papadopoulos and Mifsud meet again at Andaz Hotel in London, U.K. During meeting Mifsud claims Russians “have dirt” on Hillary Clinton; “emails of Clinton”; and “thousands of emails”.

♦May 6, 2016, Papadopoulos gets call from Christian Cantor (Israeli Embassy) wanting to introduce his ‘girlfriend’ Erika Thompson (Australian Embassy aide to Ambassador Alexander Downer). They meet at a London Pub.

[NOTE: Mueller cites the content of May 6, 2016, meeting as communicating “clinton emails” from Papadopoulos; however, Mueller conflates and falsely attributes the content material of this Erika Thompson meeting. Mueller attributes content to Ambassador Downer meeting with Papadopoulos on May 10, 2016.  Conflation appears intentional]

♦May 6, 2016, Following initial meeting, Papadopoulos gets email from Erika Thompson suggesting meeting with her boss, Australian Ambassador Alexander Downer.

♦May 10, 2016, Papadopoulos meets Ambassador Downer at the Kensington Wine Rooms in London, England.

MEDIA CLAIM: “Downer met with George Papadopoulos, where Papadopoulos — having been introduced through two intermediaries, Christian Cantor and Erika Thompson — mentioned that Russians had material on Hillary Clinton.”

Both Papadopoulos and Downer refute their May 10th meeting discussed Clinton emails.  Papadopoulos notes that Ambassador Downer is recording their conversation.

Alexander Downer is the Australian diplomat who engaged George Papadopoulos in London just days after U.S. intelligence asset Joseph Mifsud told Papadopoulos that Russians had emails from Hillary Clinton.  The communication from Ambassador Downer to the United States is what’s referenced in that EC above.

On April 18, 2019, coinciding with the release of the Mueller report, the Australian government declassified and released information which is specifically connected to the EC released today.  We can take the Australian release and overlay it into some really fantastic research on Alexander Downer, previously done by TWE:

In 1956, Australia — alongside New Zealand — were both added to the newly expanded UKUSA Agreement, which extended intelligence co-operation to those two countries with the current members of the agreement — United Kingdom, United States and Canada — which formed the alliance known as “Five Eyes”.

Many years later, on February 22, 2006, Alexander Downer and Bill Clinton signed a memorandum of understanding to spread grant money over the course of four years to a project to provide screening and drug treatment to AIDS patients in Asia as part of the Clinton Foundation.

On February 18, 2014, Downer was announced as Australia’s next High Commissioner to London, where he would replace Mike Rann.

Between March 7–13, 2016, Director James Comey visited Australia and met with Attorney General George Brandis and Justice Minister Michael Keenan.

Three days later, on March 16, Director James Clapper arrived in Australia from New Zealand via a C-17 Globemaster.

On May 10, 2016, at the Kensington Wine Rooms in London, England, Downer met with George Papadopoulos, where Papadopoulos — having been introduced through two intermediaries, Christian Cantor and Erika Thompson — mentioned that Russians had material on Hillary Clinton.

There’s a little bit of a conflict in the dates (likely due to the significantly different time zones between London and Australia). According to Downer’s calendar schedule the meeting with Papadopoulos was May 11th, 2016 (as released).

♦May 11, 2016, Ambassador Downer files notes to Australian government about the content of the conversation and the outlook of the Trump campaign foreign policy.

Here’s the heavily redacted cable communique from Downer to Canberra, AU office, on May 11th, 2016, the day he meting Papadopoulos (as released):

Here’s the excerpt from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report that describes the events. However, worth noting Mueller assigns this meeting to May 6th, 2016. [Conflating earlier meeting with Erika Thompson – with Ambassador Downer meeting with Papadopoulos on May 10, 2016. Conflation appears intentional.]

[Page #89, Muller Report]

Alexander Downer decided to inform the United States Embassy in London, England about his conversation with Papadopoulos, upon the release of the Democratic National Committee’s e-mails by WikiLeaks on July 22, 2016.

On July 23, 2016, the Australian Government contacted Elizabeth Dibble at the United States Embassy to inform her about Downer and Papadopoulos’s conversation.

♦July 26, 2016, Mueller says (pg 89, fn465) Australia informs U.S. government of Papadopoulos statements about Clinton emails.

Somehow the information was transmitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crossfire Hurricane was then opened on July 31, 2016 by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Two days later, on August 2, 2016, Special Agent Peter Strzok and another agent at the Federal Bureau of Investigation met with Downer directly in London to discuss his conversation with Papadopoulos further. Strzok then received reading materials, which he texted about to Lisa Page.

However, it’s worth noting information provided by Devin Nunes (April 2018) as it pertains to an unofficial channel of information that surrounded these events:

REPRESENTATIVE DEVIN NUNES: “That’s correct. So it took us a long time to actually get this, what’s called the “electronic communication”, as we know it now for your viewers, what it is it’s the original intelligence, original reasons that the counterintelligence was started.

Now this is really important to us because the counterintelligence investigation uses the tools of our intelligence services that are not supposed to be used on American citizens. And we’ve long wanted to know: what intelligence did you have that actually led to this investigation? So what we’ve found now, after the investigators have reviewed it, is that in fact there was no intelligence.

So we have a traditional partnership with what’s called the Five Eyes Agreement. Five Eyes Agreement involves our friends in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Canada, and of course, us. So long time processes and procedures in place where we move intelligence across.

We are not supposed to spy on each others’ citizens. And it’s worked well. And it continues to work well. And we know it’s working well because there was no intelligence that passed through the Five Eyes channels to our government.

And that’s why we had to see that original communication. So now we’re trying to figure out, as you know, we are investigating the State Department, we think there’s some major irregularities in the State Department, and we’re trying to figure out how this information about Mr. Papadopoulos of all people who was supposedly meeting with some folks in London, how that made it over across into the FBI’s hands.” (Video Interview Link)

.

 

…On the day Peter Strzok starts Crossfire Hurricane he says it “feels momentous“…

Sidney Powell Discusses the Ongoing Persecution of Michael Flynn With Lou Dobbs…


Michael Flynn defense attorney, Sidney Powell, appears on Lou Dobbs tonight to discuss the ongoing case against a background of daily revelations showing Flynn was the target of the Obama-era FBI.

Washington Post Confirms Flynn’s Name Not Masked in Obama Briefing Material – Open FBI Investigation Intercepted Kislyak Call and Generated Transcript…


The Washington Post confirms todaywhat we have been saying for almost two years.

Michael Flynn’s name was never masked in the FBI intercept of his call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Here’s the part that matters:

WaPo […] in the FBI report about the communications between the two men, Flynn’s name was never redacted, former U.S. officials said.

[…] It was the FBI, not the NSA, that wiretapped Kislyak’s calls and created the summary and transcript, the former officials said.

“When the FBI circulated [tech cuts], they included Flynn’s name from the beginning” because it was essential to understanding its significance, said a former senior U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive intelligence. “There were therefore no requests for the unmasking of that information.”  (read more)

The FBI was conducting (FISA) surveillance on Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.  When Kislyak contacted Flynn the call was intercepted by the FBI.  The calls were then transcribed and “tech cuts” created.

On January 3rd Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were text messaging about the intercept.  It is important to note these text messages have never been released; and were intentionally removed and hidden from the text messages that were released.

We only know about these specific texts from a Senate oversight committee paper that put a timeline together.

This January 3rd communication is critical so I’m going to explain it.  You will see why the FBI and DOJ and Intelligence Community have kept it hidden:

A FISA order, in this case on Sergey Kislyak, is referred to as “technical coverage” or a “tech”.  The FBI interceptors, staff doing the interception, then type up summaries of telephone conversations captured. Those are referred to as “tech cuts” or “cuts”.

The “CR cut” in the text message above is a “Crossfire Razor cut”, or a Flynn cut.

This is a summary of the call intercept.  This is the non-traditional intelligence document that FBI Director James Comey gave to DNI James Clapper to use for the briefing of President Obama on January 4th. There are no redacted or masked names because it is a raw intelligence document.

The Clapper briefing officially informed the White House of the existence of an open FBI investigation into Michael Flynn.  That briefing led to the January 5th “pull aside” meeting outlined in the Susan Rice memo.

The FBI was investigating Flynn and monitoring Russian communications to see a reaction to the sanctions imposed on December 29, 2016.  When Kislyak called Flynn the FBI legally intercepted the call because the FISA authority was surveillance on Kislyak and Flynn was also under investigation.

But there are more implications…

Peter Strzok  texts: “[Bill Priestap], like us, is concerned with over sharing.  Doesn’t want Clapper giving [the Flynn cut, or summary of intercepted call] to White House.”  All political, just shows our hand and potentially makes enemies.

Lisa Page responds: “Yeah but keep in mind we were going to put that in the doc on Friday, with potentially larger distribution than just DNI.”

Strzok Replies: “The question is should we, particularly to the entirely of the lame duck U.S. Intelligence Community with partisan axes to grind.”

The implication of the Lisa Page response about sharing the Flynn intercept, is the intention of the FBI to include the “CR cut”, the FBI summary intercept of the Kislyak call, within the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which was being released on Friday.  The filter of their entire conversation was political.

We don’t know if the Kislyak-Flynn call was used as a part of the classified evidence within the ICA.  It sounds from Lisa Page’s text response that the issue was discussed and then a decision made not to include it:  “we were going to put that in”, implies they did not.

Bill Priestap and Peter Strzok have issues with the raw “tech cut” of the intercept being shared with DNI Clapper and White House.  Lisa Page downplays those concerns by saying: ‘hey relax, in context we were about to put that readout in the ICA which is a far bigger deal than just sharing it with the White House.’

Putting it all together.  The FBI intercepted the call.  A “tech cut” summary of the call was generated exclusive to the FBI.  James Comey gave that call summary including Flynn’s name to James Clapper; and James Clapper briefed President Obama.

Michael Flynn wasn’t unmasked in documents related to the call because Flynn’s name was never masked in the documents, the FBI “CR cut”.

If I put all the transcripts and texts together, it’s easy to see the picture:

Advertisements
REPORT THIS AD