The Killing Fields & Greenpeace’s Greta Thunberg

A reader reminded me that the leader of the Khmer Rouge, Pol Pot, embraced the same ideals we are listening to in the rising trend of socialism and climate change. Pot came to admire the tribes in Cambodia’s rural northeast. He saw these people were self-sufficient and lived on the goods they produced through subsistence farming. He embraced Marxism and saw modern society as evil, as we are hearing once again in the climate change movement.

The Cambodian tribes, from Pot’s perspective, were like communes that worked together and shared everything from their collective labor. He touted that they were the example of how life should be — untainted by the evils of money, wealth and religion

In trying to force society back to a rural commune, there was mass starvation that became known as the Killing Fields.

This is a reoccurring problem where people simply hate technology and want to force the world back to a simplistic life. If Cambodia serves as yet another warning of this admixture of socialism and climate, then indeed the future does not appear to be very bright when we continually have to confront these people time and time again. In Europe, you are not even allowed to criticize climate change. Already, it has become a religion and how dare you speak out against it for you are an evil person.

Greta Thunberg is being coached by Greenpeace’s Jennifer Morgan who attended Davos along with Al Gore. Greenpeace is funding  Greta and their donors are a long list of socialists. Greta showed up just days before the election in Alberta, Canada, to tell the people they should surrender their jobs because of climate change. What is even more fascinating is that this is not being covered at all in Europe. They are not allowed to report that Greta is being groomed by Greenpeace and they were not allowed to report that she was flown into Canada to try to influence the election.

Greenpeace has a long history of violence and now they found Greta to get attention like never before. They are strategically well aware that people will listen to Greta before they would ever listen to an adult. Greenpeace is out to accomplish a similar type of goal that was attempted in Cambodia. Back to a rural lifestyle, end fossil fuels, reduce the population and end technological evolution. As the Khmer Rouge, they too are Marxists who prefer to call themselves “Progressives” when in fact it is regression they seek to impose.

So while they launched a huge investigation about Russia trying to influence the US elections, not a single word will ever be reported about how Greenpeace is using Greta to get into governments and even Davos. Because she is a child, everyone is afraid to criticize her. Jennifer Morgan would NEVER get into Davos on behalf of Greenpeace. Greta is the key to the world. With Greta, they get about $20 million in donations to force the world onto the agenda of Greenpeace.

2018 Annual GWPF Lecture – Prof Richard Lindzen – Global Warming For The Two Cultures

18.9K subscribers

2018 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Richard Lindzen Global Warming For The Two Cultures London 8 October 2018 Institution of Mechanical Engineers

CO2 Rate of Change



I read this blog post and took a look at Nasa´s own homepage. Well, they are surely promoting this climate change hysteria.

What I would like to know is if it is declining according to these statistics how do they think they can get away with this scam?

Also when I look at the statistics it looks to me as if it´s actually increasing …?

Could you please explain


REPLY: The chart is the rate of change. These people are claiming this is a climate emergency. Taking NASA’s data, yes the PPM is rising but the rate of change has been declining. So there is no climate emergency. On top of that, the times where there have been spike correlate to war, not to the number of cars on the road. I have stated before that there is ABSOLUTE proof that carrots are deadly because every person who has ever eaten a carrot has eventually died. That is an undeniable correct statement. But omitted is the fact that even those who have never eaten a carrot has also eventually died.

The book that started all this nonsense was written by paleontologist Peter D. Ward entitled “Under a Green Sky” published in 2007. He theorized that the proposition of simply measuring the average CO2 concentration and concluding that CO2 was the reason for mass extinctions is a really questionable analysis. It is true that CO2 levels have been massively higher than they are today. Looking at his chart, we are at a historic low similar to the 5,000-year low in interest rates. Any uptick is by no means cause for the assumption that will become extinct in 12 years. Ward argued that the Permian Extinction event was distinguished with very high atmospheric CO2 (3,000 ppm) levels which created a runaway Greenhouse Effect. According to current measurements, we are at the 400 level.  There is not enough data to confirm his theory is correct.

Moreover, the 1930s saw the coldest period in modern history and that is when CO2 level rose the most. There was cooling, not warming. All the charts these people use are from 1850 forward. Historically, CO2 has been substantially higher well before the Industrial Revolution.

The chart I have shown is the rate of change, not the empirical level which they show. This is like a market that presses high but is running out of momentum. The rate of change is slowing down warning there is not climate emergency that these people are claiming.

I find it curious that the sharp increases in CO2 correlate to wars. It peaked in 1930s and began to decline. The 30’s were the coldest period.

Climate Change – Hiding the Truth

COMMENT: Awesome !!!!

Yeah that’s you Martin !
National treasure

Also the Climate Change hysteria. I’ve been on that for 30 years. You are spot on.

I took 3 semesters of geology and ran the lab for my professor. He specialized in glaciology.

Martin I feel that outside of the deep state running the show and moving us into a confrontation with Russia, and a false launch, and im sure you know we have had several close calls, this climate change thing is i think in the top 5 threats to humanity. This has developed into a all encompassing religion (one completely devoid of sound science) that the globalist will use to control and limit humanity and impoverish us all.

Your assertions on this topic are spot on. My professor did actual field research in glaciology that clearly showed the mile thick ice in the Midwest.

I say to anyone who will listen, in order for me to buy what they are selling,i have to disregard much if my education from college and after from books I’ve read. Unbelievable how this deep state, media, educational
elite have deceived the people.

Enjoyed the emails – thanks Martin


REPLY: I find it amazing how people just embrace this climate change without any documentation. Geology has been a fascinating science and people do not understand that we can trace the movement of the polls based upon the magnetism of the rocks. There is something far more important than greenhouse gas and if everyone stopped having children, did not heat their home, stopped going to work, they are not going to change the fate of the planet. We are either the a fly on the rear-end of an elephant or at best a flea on a dog who finds us irritating. The planet in millions if not billions of years old and we have been around for perhaps 300,000 years.

The far more pressing issue is the risk of global cooling with solar minimum for that is when volcanoes seem to erupt on a simple correlation model. This is also perhaps when the polls flip. Even NASA is now forecasting the the next solar cycle will be the lowest in 200 years. Going into 2025, my concerns are definitely we will see a greater risk of drastic climate changes which they will distort into human caused rather than address a serious issue that may lead to major civil unrest.

There is No CO2 Climate Emergency & NASA Data Confirms that

COMMENT: Marty; Socrates has done a great job with the markets. But your forecasts that the winters would progressively get colder has beaten every forecast on the weather out there, and I have checked. This winter is setting records everywhere from Alaska to the Midwest. If what you have been forecasting for the next solar wave to be the lowest in hundreds of years, I think it is time to move south.

Keep up the great work.


REPLY: The problem is these people supporting climate change began with a predetermined conclusion. That was wrong. So, now all they do is twist everything to pretend they are correct and claim the extreme colder is because of CO2 offering no evidence whatsoever. This is not scientific.

We have put the same CO2 data from NASA into our system. Socrates forecasts that as it does with over 1,000 markets we publish every day.  Here is a simple chart using the NASA data collected from Ice Cores and we plotted this out to ascertain if there any change that warrants such global hysteria. Taking the NASA data, unaltered by me, the annual rate of change in CO2 has been declining.

White House Dinner 1996

They are simply lying about the trend to push their agenda for population control. I have stated before, that was the very same theory behind the Wetlands legislation of the ’90s. At the White House Dinner, I was seated with all the Environmental groups. They admitted their real goal was to reduce the population. They have used CO2 to now further the same agenda which is total nonsense. This chart using the very same data they do demonstrates that the rate of change is declining, not increasing.

These people are dishonest, dangerous, and hell-bent on destroying the industrial revolution and want to send us all back to the stone age eliminating cars and airplanes in additional to ending heating and airconditioning why brainwashing girls not to have children.


Conversation UPDATE: William Happer

Four years ago, Stuart went to Princeton University to interview Professor William Happer. When he interviewed him, he was aware that he was a CO2 (and its impact on climate) contrarian. Mr. Happer points out carbon dioxide is an important trace gas and an integral part of the carbon cycle, a bio-geo-chemical cycle in which carbon is exchanged between the oceans, soil, rocks and the biosphere. Virtually all of life on the plant requires CO2 concentrations to be above 150 parts per million. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere over the past 500 million years has been as high as 4,000 ppm and as low as 180 ppm. Since 1880 when CO2 was measured at Mauna Loa in Hawaii levels have risen from 280 ppm to 413 ppm as of April 2019. Happer, as you will hear, says the impact of CO2 on temperature rise has already taken effect and he points to the logarithmic scale, which is a nonlinear scale often used to analyze a large range of quantities. According to Mr. Happer, it would take another 400 ppm to affect temperature by one additional degree. Mr. Happer is also aware of the folly of predictions. And he, like Freeman Dyson, points to the inability of models to accurately predict climate outcomes. Then add in length of day, which changes by milliseconds, transferring massive amounts of energy mostly into the oceans – causing oscillations that, according to climatologist Judith Curry, are not considered in current climate models. I must ask: is the science of climate really settled? Can it ever be? Mr. Happer’s position on climate, his scientific credentials and his role in the Trump administration have made him a very large target. He is a physicist who specialized in the study of atomic physics, optics and spectroscopy. He is the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics and he is the Davisson-Germer Prize winner in Atomic or Surface Physics. He is not nor could he be a climate scientist because that designation is so new that UCLA only just launched a degree program in 2018. Since that interview, Greenpeace outed him in a sting operation and President Donald Trump recruited Professor Happer to be a member of a Presidential Committee on Climate Security. However, in September of 2019, the unflinching Mr. Happer quit. According to Science Magazine, while Happer may have been unflinching, Trump’s White House isn’t. So on Sept 13, 2019, Mr. Happer resigned. Professor Happer, as you will see in this interview, firmly believes the impact of CO2 has been misrepresented.

GWPF Lecture – “The Great Climate Fervour” – Christopher Essex

18.8K subscribers

Professor Chris Essex gives a lecture on The Great Climate Fervour to the GWPF in London, May 2017

GWPF Interview: New Solar Research Raises Climate Questions, Triggers Attacks

18.8K subscribers

Recent research by Professor Valentina Zharkova (Northumbria University) and colleagues has shed new light on the inner workings of the Sun. If correct, this new discovery means that future solar cycles and variations in the Sun’s activity can be predicted more accurately. The research suggests that the next three solar cycles will see solar activity reduce significantly into the middle of the century, producing conditions similar to those last seen in the 1600s – during the Maunder Minimum. This may have implications for temperatures here on Earth. Future solar cycles will serve as a test of the astrophysicists’ work, but some climate scientists have not welcomed the research and even tried to supress the new findings. Read Professor Zharkova’s latest research at

How the sun affects temperatures on Earth (w/ Valentina Zharkova, Northumbria University)

The sun is going through a stage known as a solar or Maunder Minimum. This is where the solar activity that ignites solar flares or sun spots has decreased. It’s a normal cycle and one that has been linked to the mini ice age that lasted more than 50 years starting in the mid-1600s. According to space weather since 2015, the number of days without a recordable sun spot has been rising year over year. NOAA, NASA and others all appear to agree the sun is entering a solar minimum phase. What it means is open to interpretation because as Professor William Happer pointed out when I asked him about the growing number of people and agencies that suggest a solar minimum could lead to a cooling off period, he directed me the Danish proverb: “It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.” It has been suggested that mathematics can establish patterns and back them up with empirical evidence to support a prediction. We reached out to Professor of Mathematics Valentina Zharkova of Northumbria University, one of the first people to raise awareness of the decrease in solar activity, for a Conversation That Matters about the sun, its reduced activity and her reading of the impact it will have on temperatures on earth.

Coping with Climate Anxiety: The Overwhelming Mental Impact of Global Climate Change

148K subscribers

Refuse to have children, stop traveling by jet, and carry chopsticks in your purse to avoid using disposable flatware at restaurants. These are some of the coping techniques adopted by folks suffering from climate anxiety, climate grief or climate despair. These new mental health conditions constitute an under-reported consequence of our modern carbon-intensive lifestyle — the overwhelming mental impact of global climate change. How can acute sufferers find relief? Watch this episode of Bill Whittle Now with Scott Ott.