Its nice that this practice has been exposed but to anyone with a brain its been obvious that all these events and town hall meeting are rigged. I gone to sustainability presentations and they are 100% scripted, i.e. the last question in a spot where questions are allowed in followed by a statement I’m glad you asked then it was our next subject and sure enough the next side answers that question. What are the chances that that would happen for every Q&A break in a two hour presentation?
Tag Archives: Barack Hussein Obama
SEC Administrative Law Courts are Unconstitutional
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Oct 6, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
The U.S. federal courts do whatever they possibly can to avoid real issues to maintain powers that are clearly unconstitutional. I reported last year when Judge Leigh Martin May struck down a SEC order on this challenge back in June 2015. Now on September 15, 2016, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed it, claiming that such a challenge must FIRST be made in the administrative court that is not constitutional to begin with. An administrative law judge does not even have to be a lawyer. They can be someone’s mistress, brother-in-law, or someone who promised some favor. They are not appointed by the president and they do not go through hearing in Congress. They can degree fines and strip you of all rights to effectively live, but the only consolation is they cannot imprison someone. They can fine you into bankruptcy and destroy your entire family financially, but hey, so can a local policeman using civil asset forfeiture.
This ruling demonstrates that there is no rule of law. They can spin you in circles, and unless you are a multi-millionaire, you will never get to the Supreme Court and they know that. The object of federal courts is always to sustain government power to PREVENT anyone from actually using the constitution to defend themselves. In this case, it took one year just for the 11th Circuit to figure a way out of having to rule on the issue, which is the standard way of ruling — avoid the issue whenever possible. It would have taken them at least a few years to get through the SEC — a year to get into the district court, another year for an appeal, and then a year for the Supreme Court who would rule they are too busy so they need not fulfill the Constitution.
Article III of the U.S. Constitution does not authorize administrative law courts. It does not even require federal courts. The “judicial power” is exclusively vested in the Supreme Court ONLY!!!!!!! It merely authorizes Congress may create federal courts if it desires.
Article III
Section 1.
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
The mere fact that the Supreme Court has claimed it can pick and choose what it wants to hear is COMPLETELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL. There is no discretionary power granted by the Constitution to the Supreme Court — NONE! As a result, there can be no rule of law if there is no ABSOLUTE right to be heard by the ONLY court that the Founding Fathers created. This is why I decided I did not want to be a lawyer. It was all a farce. I would have been in Washington, pounding on the door until they explained how they stripped all citizens of the right to be heard. They stole all of our rights and then demanded we call them honorable.
THE INTERNET TAKEOVER IS HAPPENING, THE END OF FREE SPEECH!
What Alicia Machado Didn’t Tell You! | Charles C. Johnson and Stefan Molyneux
KOMMONSENTSJANE – DONALD TRUMP WON THE DEBATE
No only do we not want more of them we want the ones that are to be gone — send them ALL back.

Poll: Donald Trump Won The Debate
jayson Derrick
Who won Monday’s Presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump? Given the partisan nature of politics, Clinton supporters will say their candidate handily won while Trump supporters will say he made a mockery of Clinton on stage.
According to an informal TwitterInc (NYSE: TWTR) poll created by Benzinga, 44 percent believe Trump emerged victorious over his rival. Thirty-nine percent of respondents believe Clinton won the first battle. The remaining 17 percent chose the political apathy option of “who cares?”
According to The Wall Street Journal’s National Politics Editor Aaron Zitner, Trump presented himself as the candidate of change and labeled Clinton as an “all talk, no action” career politician. Trump also presented himself as a fighter who will stand up for the American people who feel betrayed or ignored by current leaders.
On the other hand, Clinton presented herself as a…
View original post 105 more words
KOMMONSENTSJANE – A LETTER FROM A RETIRED MARINE TO NFL COMMISSIONER
I’m a WIA Vet Nam Vet and I will not watch another NFL game until they stop this and i know a lot of vets and others that will not support the NFL any longer. The NFL can stop this if they want but they are afraid of antagonizing the BLM group which would hurt their income. Well boycotts of the NFL by the rest of us will hurt them more the the BLM group of thugs.
Letter from Retired Marine to NFL Commissioner re: Not Standing during National Anthem
Commissioner
I’ve been a season pass holder at Yankee Stadium, Yale Bowl and Giants Stadium.
I missed the ’90-’91 season because I was with a battalion of Marines in Desert
Storm. 14 of my wonderful Marines returned home with the American Flag draped
across their lifeless bodies. My last conversation with one of them, Sgt Garrett
Mongrella, was about how our Giants were going to the Super Bowl. He never got
to see it.
Many friends, Marines, and Special Forces Soldiers who worked with or for me
through the years returned home with the American Flag draped over their
coffins.
Now I watch multi millionaire athletes who never did anything in their lives but
play a game, disrespect what brave Americans fought and died for. They are
essentially spitting in the faces and on the graves of…
View original post 460 more words
Shocking facts about Susan G. Komen for the Cure
Just good to know stuff
Analysis of Who Paid Hillary’s Speaking Fees Reveals Exactly Who Owns Her
What every one knows is follow the money and you will find what is real!
Rudy Giuliani “Trump is RIGHT about Stop and Frisk, Lester Holt Should Apologize”
Lester NBC and Hillary should apologize!
Black Lives Matter Protesters Probably Never Heard of John Casor
From the Independent Sentinel
Posted by S. Noble • August 13, 2015
General Robert E. Lee’s statue is one of seven statues being moved off the mall at the UT-Austin campus (photo above) to an obscure location. Lee was a Confederate and, according to the complaints, he was a symbol of ‘white supremacy’. Lee, ironically, abhorred the institution of slavery. “There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil,” he once said.
While Confederates have become the latest target of the left because they represent ‘white supremacy’, what about the blacks who owned slaves? There were many.
Some free black people in this country bought and sold other black people, and did so at least since 1654 and continued to do so right through the Civil War.
The 28 percent number is impressive when compared to less than 1.4 percent of all American whites and less than 4.8 percent of southern whites. The statistics show that, when freed, blacks disproportionately became slave masters.
According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man. Before 1655, there were no slaves, only indentured servants who were freed when their time was up which was usually about seven years. They were then granted 50 acres of land. Blacks also received 50 acres.
Anthony Johnson, photo below, was a black man from what is now Angola who came to the U.S. to work on a tobacco farm in 1619.
When he was freed from indentured servitude, he ran a successful farm. By 1651, he owned 250 acres and five black indentured servants. In 1654, when it was time for him to release John Casor, a black indentured servant, he told Casor he was extending his time. Casor left to work for a man by the name of Robert Parker and he lived as a free man.
Anthony Johnson sued Parker and in 1655, the court ruled Anthony could hold Casor indefinitely. The ruling allowed a black to own a slave of his own race.
This was the beginning of slavery and institutionalized racism.
John Casor
Whites could not own slaves until 1670 when that all changed and everyone, including Indians, could own blacks as slaves.
By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.
Nicolas Augustin Metoyer of Louisiana,pictured above, owned 13 slaves in 1830. He and his 12 family members collectively owned 215 slaves.
Some black slave owners purchased family members as slaves to protect them and others bought slaves to exploit them.
The great African-American historian, John Hope Franklin, states this clearly: “The majority of Negro owners of slaves had some personal interest in their property.” But, he admits, “There were instances, however, in which free Negroes had a real economic interest in the institution of slavery and held slaves in order to improve their economic status.”
The horror of slavery is still with us and the entire story needs to be told.
References: John Casor, Anthony Johnson, Henry Louis Gates Jr, and American Civil War




