Posted originally on Oct 18, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Marty, I know you have been trying to reduce the amplitude of your computer’s forecast for war. You probably deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. They gave it to Obama for trying to invade Syria. It appears that the military establishment does read you. Biden directed them to prepare for nuclear war with China, Russia, and North Korea last March, according to the New York Times. This confirms that there is a risk, and they know it but keep pushing for war with Russia anyway. Is this all because of the debt crisis? They seem to be complete idiots.
Please comment on this latest info.
JJ
ANSWER: I do not understand why this crop of leaders around the world in the West are all promoting war as if this can even be won. Look, thirty years ago, everyone wanted world peace – including every Miss America. Today, I would not be surprised if Miss America stood up and said she wanted to see World War III. These are two items from my political collection of memorabilia. I agree with you that it just seems as if they are planning on hiding in their bunkers and are planning on reducing the population all for climate change.
Did we get enough of them?
This illustration shows the radius of a 100-megatonne nuclear bomb dropped on New York City. Nuclear War will not destroy the planet. Look at Japan. Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki have proven that the “science” claimed that those cities would be uninhabitable for a thousand years after a nuclear war was wrong. Their populations doubled in 20 years after being nuked? Hiroshima now has nine times its 1945 population.
The GOOD NEWS is you can then just nuke your opponent and actually save the planet is their twisted view of nuclear war. Without electricity, your opponent could not even make a phone call to launch a response. But if we look at Chornobyl, the nuclear disaster restored the region, which became a sanctuary for animals void of humans, in Ukraine.
Bikini Atoll, 70 years after nuclear tests, is thriving. On July 24, 1946, the Baker Test shrouded its formidable height over the U.S. Navy’s test fleet. The United States dropped 23 nuclear bombs on the island, including a device in 1954 that was 1,100 times larger than the Hiroshima atom bomb. Now, a team of scientists from Stanford University has been stunned. They discovered an abundance of marine life apparently thriving in the crater of Bikini Atoll, which was declared a nuclear wasteland after the bombings.
Strangely enough, the same has been found at Chornobyl in Ukraine. It is starting to emerge that even setting off every nuclear bomb will not destroy the planet or turn Earth into space rocks. We can alter our environment by doing so and ridding the planet of humanity as the dominant species. Still, Earth will heal itself, and life will adapt exactly as scientists have discovered in Ukraine at the site of Chornobyl. Wildlife has thrived because it sent humans running.
This new evidence emerging from Chornobyl and Bikini Atoll demonstrates that we may not be as smart as we think, no less all-powerful. Those pushing for World War III see themselves far smarter than we are. They are really trying to save the planet from us – or that’s what they are whispering in the dark bowel of government. Exterminate humanity, and we can save the bugs and crickets from becoming our next food source.
Interestingly, the US has been buying medicine for radiation poisoning. They know what they are doing and could care less how many civilians are wiped out. Their view is that the population needs to be reduced anyhow.
Perhaps they have a Noah Complex and assume that they will survive in their bunkers after depopulating the world and emerging to a fresh, revitalized planet. What they are taking the world into is a very serious change, and these people no longer represent us by any shape of the imagination.
Posted originally on Oct 18, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
COMMENT: Well sir; it look like Russia reads you.
WK
REPLY: We keep this as an open forum so everyone can read it. We are not even blocked in Russia or China because we remain independent and just follow the facts. But let’s get real. When you have President Biden saying he would never talk with Trump, this is illustrating the hostile atmosphere in the USA and for that, MedveDev does not have to read this blog. It is everywhere. The Democratic Convention was a hate fest throwing Trump’s name around 289 times. You are inspiring the weak minded to engage in massive civil unrest. The US is so divided, it cannot possible stand. We will see serious unrest either way post-election. I do not think that is a view that in today’s environment is unique to this site.
Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance
Mark Halprin gives his prediction about what will happen when President Trump wins the election. Tucker Carlson plays along, with both pretending not to remember what happened in 2016.
What Mark Halprin predicts, is exactly what happened in 2016. WATCH:
Every single thing in this response is exactly what happened in 2016. The silly part is both Tucker Carlson and Mark Halprin pretending not to remember what happened. Some reminder pictures from 2016 below.
In 2016 the Democrats: ~ organized a refusal to certify the election ~ boycotted the inauguration ~ claimed Russia hacked the election ~ broke out in violent protests, including arson, on inauguration day ~ put their genitals on their heads ~ conducted violent protests ~ began the Trump-Russia campaign for the next two years; then tried impeachments.
Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance
In this interview Tucker Carlson talks with Mark Halprin, a well-connected journalist that Tucker Carlson cites as the epicenter of all political power and journalistic knowledge since the mid-1980’s. Accordingly, the magnanimous and enlightened Mark Halprin knows more about the institutions of electoral influence, political power structures, people and organizations of political influence than most journalists, so sayeth Carlson. And so, their discussion follows along.
If you are nostalgic for the time before you saw the strings on the political marionettes, and/or you like to remind yourself how you viewed politics in the era long before elections were decided by ballots instead of voters, you will enjoy this satiating conversation of how things used to be.
Both Halprin and Carlson pretend things are just like they were, while they apply 1998 political insight to the 2024 election year, and -for some reason- people discuss it.
However, if you have stopped pretending and you understand that modern political outcomes are determined by ballot systems, local ballot printing, fraudulent voter rolls to give the illusion of attribution to the locally printed ballots, and tabulation centers that conduct the necessary scanning of unattributed ballots to a number needed to generate the outcome, then this food-filled discussion about political sides between Halprin and Carlson ends up leaving you somewhat hungry.
Here’s an example. Within the interview Mark Halprin notes that Kamala Harris campaign has raised over a billion dollars, and that’s just the money from inside the campaign; there’s much more from “outside groups and interests.” With jaw-agape Carlson curiously asks where that money came from? Halprin replies, “I have no idea,” and they simply move along.
Yes, the conversation is about various subsets of voters, black men who don’t support Harris as much, and a multitude of other various popular narratives that surround the 2024 election as written in various media. Let me cut to the proverbial chase, none of that stuff matters.
Yes, along the same approach expressed by the Halprin’s and Carlson’s of the world, Barack Obama might be calling out the “brothers” who do not intend to vote for Kamala Harris. However, in the real world of 2024 a very non-pretending James Clyburn might just as well say, “yes they are, they just don’t know it.” Why, because Clyburn controls the ballots of “the brothers”; their voting intent is irrelevant.
Thus, we highlight once again the distinction between voters and ballots that seems intentionally lost amid a constructed interview between the very enlightened Halprin and the curiously incurious Carlson.
What exactly is the value of the conversation when the subject matter surrounding it is as useful to the 2024 election as vinyl records to modern rap music. You decide.
To answer the question about Kamala Harris’ extraordinary fundraising, let’s just revisit demonstrable history.
First, James Clyburn’s operation was constructed during the Obama era through the financing of something called the Pigford Settlement. Yes, Pigford-I was the payment mechanism behind taxpayer funds being shifted from govt to the very specifically black community. The Clyburn team, along with legal powerhouses like Morgan & Morgan, were part of the payment distribution architecture.
With the capital to start the mechanics of the AME ballot scanning operation now financed, along comes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, set up by Elizabeth Warren, to funnel fines and pressure payments from the USA banking and finance sector to a host of progressive networks, ie community organizing groups.
There you go. That’s the ‘elevator speech’ answer behind the odd “I don’t know” retort of Mark Halprin.
What was the intent of this interview? I have no idea. However, what they discuss seems like a conversation that might have been pertinent to elections many cycles ago, but not now.
In the modern era facilitated by the rise of Teh One Lightbringer of all political truth, what many might remember as our promised “fundamental change,” voters are irrelevant to the outcome.
That said, there are very serious efforts underway to apply tactical civics in this new battleground. In that contest based on reality we destroy local ballot printing operations, block the use of fraudulent voter rolls and find industrious ways to stop the secret scanning operations within the AME network of 17 county tabulation centers.
If tactical civics are successful, and we are about to discover that “if” answer, then the conversation that Halprin and Carlson are currently having might reapply in the next election. However, until then, talking about what voters intend to happen while ignoring the irrelevance therein, seems to miss the proverbial point of where we are in the modern era of ‘ballot collection’ elections.
Chapters: 0:00 Become a Member at TuckerCarlson.com 1:23 The State of the Presidential Race 6:37 Does Kamala Harris Stand For Anything? 12:23 What Is Harris’s Relationship Like With Joe Biden? 14:34 Harris Can’t Answer This Simple Question 16:01 What Do Harris’s Donors Think? 17:26 Mark Halperin’s Reporting That Biden Would Give up the Nomination 28:45 The Worst Scandal in American Journalism 31:09 Was the Biden/Trump Debate a Setup? 40:17 Covering the Trump Campaign 51:54 How Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama Took Out Biden 1:02:19 Corporate Media’s Self-Destruction and the Future of News 1:10:43 Black Men Are Voting for Trump 1:16:32 Why Is Our Voting System So Complicated? 1:18:58 Who’s Winning the Swing States? 1:19:54 Who’s Winning Nevada? 1:21:40 Who’s Winning Arizona? 1:25:55 Who’s Winning Georgia? 1:27:36 Who’s Winning North Carolina? 1:28:54 Who’s Winning Wisconsin? 1:29:39 Who’s Winning Michigan? 1:30:32 Who’s Winning Pennsylvania? 1:34:00 Here Is What the Private Polls Are Saying 1:39:21 War and NATO 1:50:15 RFK Jr. Being Anti-Establishment 1:53:48 Who Is Running the Country Right Now? 1:55:11 Trump Derangement Syndrome Will Be the Biggest Mental Health Crisis in American History 1:58:49 What Happens If Trump Loses?
NARCISSISM: […] If Trump wins, Obama might be seen as the aberration in the history of American politics, rather than Trump and his nativist authoritarianism. Obama acolytes have spent the last eight years rationalizing Trump as the last gasp backlash to the Democrat and his presidency. (link)
Posted originally on Oct 16, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: What do you think of this independent journalist _____ who claims Trump is not what people think and is pointing to people in his first cabinet?
FLA
ANSWER: Pure propaganda. I question what her motive is or if she is just ignorant of what is taking place in the Biden Administration. There is a serious lack of any inside knowledge of how things truly work behind the curtain. I strongly urge you to watch the new documentary of General Mike Flynn. Trump did not pick his own cabinet in 2016. The Deep State did and stuffed in people like John Bolton. Obama warned Trump not to give General Flynn a position because Obama was all about protecting the Deep State. Even Flynn states in his documentary that Trump was unaware of the dark corridors of Washington.
As I said before, I was part of the vetting process for people who wanted to be president. They would send me in to advise on how the world economy really worked. I was in Tokyo and asked to go to Texas on my way back to meet with Ross Perot that weekend when he suddenly withdrew, claiming nonsense over his daughter’s wedding.
Perot later blamed Bush for threatening him. But Ross did not know how the Deep State really controlled the country. They took out JFK and RFK both because they were a threat to the intelligence community. Like Trump, Ross was an outsider, which would not be allowed. Ross pulled out of the race, and the TRUE reason was they threatened to indict him and shut down his industrial airport under claims that drugs were being flown into that facility. Perot Field Fort Worth Alliance Airport is about 14 miles north of Fort Worth, Texas. The airport is mainly focused on cargo operations. It provides no major commercial passenger airline service. It was the world’s first purely industrial airport. That was at stake.
I know I was flying back from Tokyo for an urgent meeting with Ross, but it was canceled because he was threatened by force his withdrawal. This is the same MO they did to Flynn and eventually to me. Mark Pitman of Bloomberg News had just written a story about our operations. I was NOT managing money for the Japanese but buying their portfolios. I met Mark at the Hyatt Hotel by Grand Central Station. He vowed we are mot going to allow them to do this to you. Bloomberg pulled him off my case and would not allow him to write anything. They handed to David Glovin, who always supported the government. Bloomberg followed the order of the Justice Department and was by no means reporting the facts.
People make up conspiracy theories based on clips they might read. Unless you have actually been behind the curtain – you do not have any idea of what is really running this country.
A vote for Kamala is not for her. She will run nothing. The real president in the Biden Administration is Antony Bliken, just as Dick Cheney was the real President in Bush Jr.’s administration. And BTW, I was asked to be Chief Economic Adviser in that Administration and turned it down. So I know who even picks the cabinets.
I know for a fact that Bush Jr. did NOT pick Cheney – they picked Cheney. I was told that they needed qualified people to fill the cabinet because Bush Jr. was “stupid,” and you really do not see him out and about giving statements or speeches. This is not BS, nor is it speculation – I was there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 