Schumer’s Position Toward Feinstein in 2020 Explains Schumer’s Maneuvers in 2016…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree house on October 21, 2020 by sundance

An interesting DC storyline surrounding Senate Judiciary Vice-Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, and the lack of support for her based on party backlash, highlights an interesting shift in 2016 that few paid attention to. First, the current story:

(Via CNN) – Senate Democratic leaders on Tuesday pointedly refused to say if they supported California Sen. Dianne Feinstein staying in her post as the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, sidestepping questions about the veteran party elder after she praised Republicans’ handling of the confirmation proceedings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.

[…] “I’ve had a long and serious talk with Sen. Feinstein,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters when asked if he was looking to make changes atop the powerful committee. “That’s all I’m going to say about it right now.” (read more)

2020 Democrats are not happy with Senator Feinstein for not pushing the party narrative to seek and destroy SCOTUS nominee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett.  This helps highlight the 2016 motive to remove Feinstein from the vice-chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Senator Feinstein was the vice-chair of the SSCI during the 2016 operation to stop Trump & then frame the “insurance policy” against the incoming president-elect administration.

However, in order for the SSCI, the centerpiece for the legislative coup, to be successfully weaponized against President Trump in 2017, senate leadership knew they needed a different person, a more reliable partisan willing to usurp the administration; and that is why Feinstein was told to abdicate her position and was replaced by Senator Mark Warner.

That is why less than a month after the inauguration of President Trump, the new vice-chair of the senate intel committee was conspiring with political entities inside and outside government to carry out the plan.https://www.scribd.com/embeds/371101285/content?start_page=1&view_mode&access_key=key-pMEa6x5I0qt6SU7fudq7View this document on Scribd

.

Senator Mark Warner immediately went to work on the effort to remove President Trump by working with Dan Jones (Fusion-GPS) and Chris Steele via Adam Waldman.  A few months later that same plan was enhanced with the addition of the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel.  Warner was then working with the SCO (inside DOJ) and the team of Jones, Glenn Simpson, Adam Waldman and others outside government.

Part of that original plan included the distribution of the FISA warrant to reinforce an FBI Trump-Russia narrative against the Trump administration.  Building validity for that narrative is  why Vice-Chairman Mark Warner instructed SSCI Security Director James Wolfe to leak the Carter Page FISA application on March 17, 2017, to media.

Hidin’ Biden


Joe Biden has returned to his basement. He’s in ‘duck and cover’ mode. He’s taking a vacation from his problems, which are legion.

Sleepy Joe is clearly unqualified for president. In fact, he should be locked up. He and his son committed graft. Hunter’s laptop has revealed his father’s involvement in schemes to sell influence and enrich his family. Their relationship with China is even more disturbing than their corrupt actions in Ukraine.

Joe is resting up ahead of his next debate with President Trump. In order to compete, operatives will presumably pump Joe full of drugs. Maybe he can borrow his son’s crack pipe.

—Ben Garrison

The October Laptop Surprise


Joe Biden has been compromised by the Chinese CCP government. He is a known national security threat

Fredy Lowe image

Pe-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Fredy Lowe —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 21, 2020

The October Laptop SurprisePlease promise not to even whisper amongst yourselves what you are about to read here. Do not share it, or even comment below about Hunter Biden’s laptop, because social media tells us that you are not qualified to know or discuss this information at the risk of having your account banned, where you will possibly be electronically scorned for life.

And, as if the threat of being banned by FB or Twitter were not bad enough, the ultimate warning was laid down by James Clapper, “Fight if you want, but there’s nothing you can do. ‘The emails are Russian’ is going to be the official dominant narrative in the mainstream political discourse, and there’s nothing you can do to stop it! Resistance is Futile.”

The truncated version of our ‘unspoken tale’ began after corresponding with Larry Johnson, a veteran CIA agent and working in the State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism.  Joe Biden’s son. Hunter, who resides in California, came to Wilmington, Delaware, on or about April 12, 2019, where his father Joe, aka Big Guy (Democrat candidate for POTUS) lives. As a former investigator myself, we often relied upon, and thanked God for, the basic stupidity of criminals who would give us some of our most informative and creditable leads. And so, having said that, there was more-than-likely a discussion over the three (3) laptops and what to do with them. If Big Guy was a ‘clear-thinking-criminal’ he would have called Hillary for advice, but no, they decided on their own, (now this part is just investigatory speculation) to submerge the laptops in the bath tub. But, now fast-thinking-Hunter needed to confirm that the laptops were water-damaged beyond repair and took them to a local computer repair shop in Wilmington on the aforementioned April 12th date.

Our hero JP, looked them over, saying one was destroyed by ‘some kind of liquid’ (luckily Hunter removed the rubber ducky from the bag…), but one was fine and he could retrieve the data from the hard drive of the third. Hunter, who could have been in a drug induced haze when he signed a service agreement left the shop, thinking they were now gone forever, with no plans to ever return to the shop.

After safely removing all the data from the damaged laptop, our hero John Paul tried multiple times to contact Hunter to pick them up, but to no avail. Months went by (May, June, July and August) and, according to Delaware law, when a product is left for service and not retrieved by the original owner within ninety (90) days, the legal ownership is transferred to the repair shop, which was specified in the agreement that Hunter signed.

Then on September 25, 2019, the White House released a printed version of President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. John Paul was shocked to hear this and realized that he was in possession of potentially ‘radioactive’ material from the laptop’s hard drive, which he still had in his possession. He recalled that the data contained hundreds, if not thousands, of confidential emails to and from unknown people in the Ukraine, China and Russia. JP thinking this enormous amount of vital information may be relevant to a federal investigation, which now might involve the President of the United States, contacted his father Mac, who lived in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Mac was a well-respected man, known as being a decorated Vietnam Veteran, who flew gunships in Vietnam, and then continued his military service with an impeccable record until he retired as a Colonel in the US Air Force. He agreed with John Paul and offered to make initial contact by taking the data files to the FBI office in Albuquerque. But, after discussing the potential importance of the information, he was blown off by an arrogant agent, who was uninterested, and basically told Mac to leave the office.

Sometime in mid-November 2019, as JP began thinking that the government was uninterested in the data, was surprised by two FBI agents (Joshua Williams and Mike Dzielak) from the local Wilmington office who simply walked into his shop. JP immediately offered to give them the data files from Hunter Biden’s laptop, but after a brief discussion, they again refused and left John Paul’s shop.

About two weeks later (in late November/early December 2019), the FBI finally returned to JP’s shop and took the data from Hunter Biden’s laptop computer. It is worth noting here that our hero John Paul Mac Issac, after realizing that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had no initial interest in the data files, never considered taking it to the media or possibly a tabloid which would undoubtedly have paid big bucks for this potentially salacious information, where the source would never have to be revealed. But, John Paul Mac Issac was his father’s son, an honorable man of character and integrity who never even consider the huge payday he might otherwise be ‘entitled to’.

Never shared the incriminating data from the laptop with President Trump’s defense team

And, then on December 18, 2019, President Donald Trump was formally impeached. And, on that day, JP knew for certain that the FBI (Christopher Wray), and by extension, the Department of Justice (William Barr) never shared the incriminating data from the laptop with President Trump’s defense team. And, in the normal course of his business, JP had made a forensic copy, an exact clone of the data from the laptop, contacted President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudi Giuliani, and arranged to give him a copy of the massive amount of data from Hunter Biden’s laptop. And, as you now know, after spending a considerable time of due diligence as an investigative prosecutor, Rudi Giuliani gave the initial story of the contents on Hunter Biden’s laptop to the New York Post. But, know now that there is much more to come—much more.

Thank God that the all-powerful social media giants wanting to crush this amazing story by sending out fools like James Clapper to make ultimatums saying that THE EMAILS ARE RUSSIAN!  can no longer un-ring this bell! Every possible version of this blockbuster story is now being told by every alternate media source available, and of course that FoxNews TV host Tucker Carlson, is one of the only trusted sources who has the integrity to report the truth.

Realizing my lead off was tongue-in-cheek, it is now more important than ever to find ways to break away from the mainstream and social media and share this vitally important information with each other, to electronically share and to make sure it cannot be corrupted by powerful interests, such as the ones James Clapper referred to. Please consider this as your civic duty to share this as we know the legacy media will continually attempt to influence the outcome of our upcoming presidential election by withholding and/or corrupting these truths.

There are so many moving parts to this salacious story

There are so many moving parts to this salacious story, but one of the most important for us to analyze is the silence of the FBI Director Christopher Wray and his boss, Attorney General William Barr. In their secretive minds, the data from the Hunter Biden laptop never existed. Thinking they were in possession of the only copy Wray and Barr made a conscious decision to hold back the files for safe-keeping, while seemingly hoping and praying that it would all go away when Joe Biden was elected president.

Thankfully, John Paul was no fool and made additional copies of the data files. President Trump should immediately call Wray and Barr into the Oval Office for a serious discussion of their plans, going forward. Then the question arises of what Nancy Pelosi knew, and when did she know it? Or what and when did Adam Schiff or Chuck Schumer know about the incriminating data found on Hunter Biden’s laptop?

We need to stop and think for a quiet moment and consider how different our world would have been had the FBI in the Albuquerque office, or for that matter possibly the agents in the Wilmington office, had been honest investigators, and as well as them having honest bosses.  Firstly, President Donald J. Trump would not have been impeached, and secondly of equal importance, Bernie Sanders would have been the Democratic candidate for President of the United States, certainly not Joe Biden.

Joe Biden has been compromised by the Chinese CCP government. He is a known national security threat.

LOCK HIM UP!

Are you going to vote for any Democrats this time?


The Democrat Party is not only the party of slavery, it’s the party of tyranny and oppression

Charles Wills image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Charles Wills —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 20, 2020


Are you going to vote for any Democrats this time?A friend recently said he didn’t like some of the Republican candidates running for office, and he was thinking about voting for a Democrat instead. He asked, “Are you going to vote for any Democrats this time?” I responded, “no patriotic American should cast a vote for any Democrat in the coming election.” I say that because the Democrat Party is a corrupt socialist organization.

Furthermore, the Democrat Party is still the party of slavery (socialism is a form of slavery) and anyone running for office as a Democrat knows that, unless they are completely brainwashed. Either way, I can’t name one Democrat fit to hold public office. Just ask this one question: “Would anyone with integrity join an organization filled with people who have no integrity whatsoever?

Democrat Party and their media accomplices have shown that they have no scruples by repeatedly lying to our faces everyday without guilt or embarrassment

n addition, anyone attracted to or associated with the Democrat Party must approve of the party’s unscrupulous behavior. If they disapproved of the party’s unscrupulous behavior, they wouldn’t be members of the Democrat Party, would they? Honest, moral people are not attracted to immoral, criminal organizations like the Democrat Party.

Moreover, the Democrat Party and their media accomplices have shown that they have no scruples by repeatedly lying to our faces everyday without guilt or embarrassment. That’s a characteristic of socialists. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s minister of propaganda, once said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie.”

In America, the Democrats have an unscrupulous, communist media and a political swamp to shield them. Democrats and their media accomplices have repeatedly lied to us without guilt. If they feel no guilt or shame after blatantly lying, then they will certainly not feel any empathy for those hurt by their lies. That’s because guilt and empathy are linked emotions. You can’t have one without the other. If you have ever said, I will never do that to another person again, you were feeling guilt and expressing empathy.

Furthermore, socialists and their corrupt media have no empathy for those hurt by their lies, although they claim to be humanitarians. For example, after socialists gained control over Germany’s healthcare system, they opened elderly care centers and hospitals for the incapacitated, claiming it was the humanitarian thing to do.

However, the humanitarian claim was a lie because, after establishing so called humanitarian care centers, the socialists began euthanizing the elderly, incapacitated and anyone else who could not work for the Reich. Then, Hitler’s socialist government claimed that euthanization of the elderly and incapacitated was the humanitarian thing to do. It’s sickening how socialists paint evil as good

Obama’s appointed bureaucrats, within the FBI and Department of Justice, brazenly violated the constitutional rights of President Trump

When Obama was peddling the takeover of the healthcare system, he was asked if an elderly grandmother, who needed expensive treatment to extend her life, would get the help she needed. Obama’s response was that she would just have to take a pain pill. In other words, she wasn’t worth the expense to keep her alive. That’s socialized medicine, and it’s as heartless and callous as the socialists who run it.

Right now, the Democrat Party, their bureaucrats and the media are shielding the Biden crime family from exposure and prosecution by making up lies to discredit the evidence. The evidence came from Hunter Biden’s laptop, and it indicates that Joe Biden sold America out to Communist China and was involved in racketeering both as a senator and as vice president.

Moreover, the Democrat Party is filled with racketeers who have no moral compass. Nothing, no matter how evil and depraved, is beneath them. For instance, Democrats promote immoral and irresponsible behavior (free sex) by offering genocide services known as abortion. They make it sound less evil by calling it women’s reproductive rights, but it’s still the slaughter of innocents. Margret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, in her “Negro Project”, called abortion birth control. (NY University: Margaret Sanger Papers Project)

In addition, Obama’s appointed bureaucrats, within the FBI and Department of Justice, brazenly violated the constitutional rights of President Trump, railroaded his associates, including General Michael Flynn, and plotted to remove the President from office, which was an act of treason. Obama and his appointees used the FBI and Department of Justice as political weapons to entrap and prosecute their opponents. That’s a characteristic of socialism.

America’s criminal elite are still above the law

When President Trump replaced clueless Jeff Sessions with William (Bill) Barr, we all thought Barr was going to apply the law equally, regardless of political affiliation. We thought the new Attorney General was going to hold former Obama appointed bureaucrats accountable for their abuse of power and criminal behavior. That hasn’t happened yet, and I doubt it ever will.

America’s criminal elite are still above the law. If the Democrats win the upcoming election, through hook or crook, everything will be swept under the rug, and the Director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, will be rewarded for sitting on Hunter Biden’s laptop. The FBI has had Biden’s laptop since December of 2019.

Finally, the Democrat’s and the media’s shielding of communist insurrectionists like ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter is a testament to their hatred of America. Ironically, ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter mirror the actions of the brown shirts of Nazi Germany because that’s a characteristic of socialism. We call it tyranny, and that’s why no patriotic American should consider voting for any Democrat. The Democrat Party is not only the party of slavery, it’s the party of tyranny and oppression.

REPORTS: FBI Confirms Custody of Hunter Biden Laptop and Authenticity of Emails…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 20, 2020 by sundance

According to late-breaking information from Fox News, the FBI has now confirmed the seizure of Hunter Biden’s laptops and confirmed earlier DNI statements that Hunter Biden emails were not part of a Russia disinformation campaign.

“FBI in possession of laptop containing Hunter Biden’s emails, and agree with Director of National Intelligence Ratcliffe’s assessment that emails were not part of Russian disinformation campaign.” LINK

The FBI confirms possession of the computers which allegedly contain emails implicating former Vice-President Joe Biden in his son’s international business dealings. This FBI confirmation comes 12 hours after President Trump requested attorney general Bill Barr ‘act fast’ and expressed support for an appointment of a special counsel.

CBS is also confirming the story:

It Begins – DOJ Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Google Inc…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 20, 2020 by sundance

Of all the seismic events surrounding the architecture of the deep state, the mechanisms within the swamp and the universe that surrounds all of the ancillary aspects we have come to categorize under names such as “Obamagate”, “Spygate”, “FISAgate” and the surveillance state writ large, none are as universally important as this one.

In the most significant measure this foundation is the “there” in the phrase: “there are trillions at stake.”  This is the substrate that holds the swamp in place.  It was not coincidental the Big Tech conglomeration was the first and primary focus of Obama’s Chicago network.  The downstream consequences cannot be overstated.

The DOJ has filed the class action lawsuit against Google Inc [pdf here], and while Google, and their subsidiaries (YouTube etc) are the secondary targets don’t think for a second that this does not touch on every single aspect of the ancillary technology monopoly; that includes social media platforms.

In short, this is a big effen deal.

FROM THE DOJ – Today, the Department of Justice — along with eleven state Attorneys General — filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to stop Google from unlawfully maintaining monopolies through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices in the search and search advertising markets and to remedy the competitive harms. The participating state Attorneys General offices represent Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina, and Texas.

“Today, millions of Americans rely on the Internet and online platforms for their daily lives.  Competition in this industry is vitally important, which is why today’s challenge against Google — the gatekeeper of the Internet — for violating antitrust laws is a monumental case both for the Department of Justice and for the American people,” said Attorney General William Barr.

“Since my confirmation, I have prioritized the Department’s review of online market-leading platforms to ensure that our technology industries remain competitive.  This lawsuit strikes at the heart of Google’s grip over the internet for millions of American consumers, advertisers, small businesses and entrepreneurs beholden to an unlawful monopolist.”

 “As with its historic antitrust actions against AT&T in 1974 and Microsoft in 1998, the Department is again enforcing the Sherman Act to restore the role of competition and open the door to the next wave of innovation—this time in vital digital markets,” said Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen.

As one of the wealthiest companies on the planet with a market value of $1 trillion, Google is the monopoly gatekeeper to the internet for billions of users and countless advertisers worldwide. For years, Google has accounted for almost 90 percent of all search queries in the United States and has used anticompetitive tactics to maintain and extend its monopolies in search and search advertising.

As alleged in the Complaint, Google has entered into a series of exclusionary agreements that collectively lock up the primary avenues through which users access search engines, and thus the internet, by requiring that Google be set as the preset default general search engine on billions of mobile devices and computers worldwide and, in many cases, prohibiting preinstallation of a competitor. In particular, the Complaint alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained monopolies in search and search advertising by:

  • Entering into exclusivity agreements that forbid preinstallation of any competing search service.
  • Entering into tying and other arrangements that force preinstallation of its search applications in prime locations on mobile devices and make them undeletable, regardless of consumer preference.
  • Entering into long-term agreements with Apple that require Google to be the default – and de facto exclusive – general search engine on Apple’s popular Safari browser and other Apple search tools.
  • Generally using monopoly profits to buy preferential treatment for its search engine on devices, web browsers, and other search access points, creating a continuous and self-reinforcing cycle of monopolization.

These and other anticompetitive practices harm competition and consumers, reducing the ability of innovative new companies to develop, compete, and discipline Google’s behavior.  (read more)

The Statement from AG Bill Barr is HERE

…”The complaint filed today against Google is based on violations of the U.S. antitrust laws and is separate and distinct from concerns raised about content moderation and political censorship by online platforms. As part of the Department’s broader review of market-leading online platforms, we listened to myriad public concerns about how online platforms fail their users. While many of the concerns we heard were competition-related, others were not – like online child exploitation, public safety, and censorship. Outside the Antitrust Division, the Department has considered these issues separately, including by advocating for Section 230 legislative reforms. Our antitrust investigation of Google, by contrast, is based solely on traditional antitrust principles and is aimed at promoting consumer welfare through robust competition.” (more)

On May 28th, after President Trump signed an executive order targeting on-line censorship, CTH wrote a twitter thread about it.  There had to be a breaking point where the FCC or DOJ stepped-in to address the issues if our constitutional republic is to survive.

[Read Executive Order Here] – In the periphery of this executive action there was a widespread expectation of this antitrust lawsuit against Google Inc and their affiliated companies. The controlling ideology of ‘big tech’ merges with legal action by the DOJ.

There have been visible signals, subtle but visible, the DOJ was about to move on a massive (the biggest in history) antitrust lawsuit against Google and all affiliates.

The issue did not necessarily surface as most would think; via a bias based on conservative -vs- leftist ideology in content manipulation; though those underlying aspects are a part of the larger underpinning we will soon see surface.

Antitrust lawsuits, writ large, are based on “prices”, “costs”, and net “financial” distortions caused by corporations not competing based on open commerce. “Antitrust” in it’s structural form is based on costs and the manipulation of prices.  Essentially, controlled commerce.

In the digital sphere the targeted firms have not opened themselves to liability based on ideology; but rather Google, all subsidiaries and alliances, have opened themselves to antitrust violations through the manipulation and control of financial benefit.

Demonitization of digital platform content providers, in combination with Google’s control of almost all ad revenue in the digital space, is what has opened the door for DOJ intervention based on antitrust laws.

Antitrust intervention is warranted because the content being generated on these on-line, digital platforms, is being arbitrarily valued by the media company GoogleAds and not the free market. Directing pathways and content promotion is another former of devaluation. Devaluing certain content they are ideologically opposed to creates consumer distortions.

Underpinning that revenue control is the ideological nature of the control enforcer, in this example Google. However, for the purpose of antitrust lawsuits, that motive is irrelevant.

The methods, practices and purposeful control of value; through collusion of corporate interest specific to a planned and organized effort to control monetary benefit; is the part of their activity that is quantifiable, discoverable, easily provable, and ultimately unlawful.

The financial distortion of internet commerce is the crack in the Big Tech stranglehold that should afford the DOJ the opportunity to step in.  Google (and all subsidiaries) will lose on the substance of their defense because ultimately their business practice has resulted in, and arguably they have engaged in, price fixing.

It will take time, but from an optimistic position the DOJ take action will eventually force Google into a settlement.  There could be a massive financial settlement in addition to a negotiated Consent Decree. Within the decree terms, we could/should see a break-up.

Any antitrust action is only tangentially related to President Trump’s previous confrontation with Twitter and big tech social media based on ideological lines. However, it is easy to see how the two issues will merge.  The monetary distortions are based on ideology.

Share this:

President Trump Supports an Independent Special Counsel to Investigate Foreign Payments to Biden Family…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 20, 2020 by sundance

Earlier this morning President Trump called-in to Fox News for an interview on several topics. During a part of the interview President Trump draws a comparison between confirmed evidence of Hunter Biden selling influence with false accusations of Donald Trump Jr. selling influence.

President Trump discusses the upcoming debate and outlines his support for an independent special counsel to investigate how payments to Hunter by several foreign governments were constructed as a back-door process to purchase action from Joe Biden.

Given the factual, demonstrable and clearly evidenced institutional biases within the DOJ and FBI, how exactly is a special counsel supposed to be appointed and operated?

Accepting the traditional nature of the approach; yet overlaying the known corruption within the DC institutions; any investigation seems rather futile.

Chuck Schumer will not Lose – Because He is Not Running


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted Oct 20, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: I really had to laugh how many people claim they called the Trump victory in 2016 on just inuendos. The real laugh is the lastest one that claims Pelosi, Schumer, and AOC will all lose. Schumer isn’t even running until 2022. Thank you for your report. You covered Pelosi and AOC. You are the only one with real models.

Fantastic work.

JB

REPLY: Correct. Chuck Schummer runs in 2022 – not 2020. To even make that prediction shows they do not understand politics. Only the House runs every 2 years. The Senate terms are 6 years and 1/3 run in one election – not the entire Senate. I did not see that forecast, but it is just laughable. We have opened our political forecasting to the public. Typically, this is put out at $5,000 for institutional only. This year is really important.

Presidential Debate Commission Will Mute Mics During Final Debate…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 19, 2020 by sundance

In yet another transparent effort to support Joe Biden, the presidential debate commission has announced they will mute microphones during the two minute answer sessions as part of a strategy to assist the promotion of disinformation.

(Via New York Post) The Commission on Presidential Debates has decided to mute microphones to allow each candidate the opportunity for uninterrupted remarks during this week’s final forum.

The mute button will be featured at the start of each 15-minute segment during opening comments, according to the commission. After that time, both mics will be turned on without a mute option to enable debate. (read more)

The Trump campaign responds:

Members Only – CNN Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Shared His Penis During Zoom Call With Coworkers…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 19, 2020 by sundance

CNN senior legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin is apologizing to his family after sharing his penis with coworkers during a Zoom call. Apparently Mr. Toobin was on a members only Zoom teleconference with The New Yorker and WYNC radio when he displayed his genitals to the audience. The New Yorker has suspended Toobin, prompting apologies for his family:

(Vice News) The New Yorker has suspended reporter Jeffrey Toobin. Sources tell VICE it’s because he exposed himself during a Zoom call last week between members of the New Yorker and WNYC radio.

Toobin said in a statement to Motherboard: “I made an embarrassingly stupid mistake, believing I was off-camera. I apologize to my wife, family, friends and co-workers.”

“I believed I was not visible on Zoom. I thought no one on the Zoom call could see me. I thought I had muted the Zoom video,” he added.

New Yorker spokesperson Natalie Raabe said: “Jeffrey Toobin has been suspended while we investigate the matter.” (more)