In his latest Firewall, Bill looks into the fallacies involved in the latest product of the Progressive Synthetic Injustice machine.
Tag Archives: Imperial Presidency
Interesting Perspective – Newt Gingrich Discusses Status of Candidates…
A good analysis on the current political situation.
A Snapshot of what Obama has accomplished in 7 years and 3 months and there are still 9 months to go.
Judge Jeanine: Only One Person Can Keep Americans Safe
Comparing the presidential candidates’ reactions to threats.
Fox News: Justice with Judge Jeanine Pirro
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/justice…
Candidate Bernie Sanders Full “Bernin’ Bridges” Interview Discussing Debbie Wasserman Schultz…
Bernie is a real goof ball but he is right about the democrat party process in picking a candidate; further the democrat party is much worse than the republican party who has a much smaller influence in their process.
BOOM – Trump Leads Clinton In ABC/Washington Post Poll, Even With D+8 Poll Sample…
Trump is on the way there is no stopping him now!
Donald Trump Message to National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference…
Hillary doesn’t have a chance!
ECM 2015.75: The Rock vs. Hard Place
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted May 21, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, with your 2015.75 turning point on the ECM, you said that was the peak in government and the following 4.3 years would turn down rather hard. You also said 2016 would be a strong rise in 3rd party activity and people are now talking even about Bernie running 3rd party. You said 2017 would be the year from political hell and it looks really crazy here in Europe and with Merkel gone, everything will change. Then you said the monetary system would change by 2020 but could come as early as 2018. You said interest rates would start to rise in 2016 as early as March and that would be the fuel behind the dollar and help create the Sovereign Debt Crisis. I understand this is not your opinion and I can now see how each is linked to create the trend. The Berlin conference was fantastic and really helped me understand how this all fits together. My question is simply this. Do you have any idea what the type of monetary system we are headed into? What survives? You said the IMF is trying to position itself for that role which you opposed. Any clue yet?
ANSWER: The Fed is between a rock and a hard place and is trying to be that little flower that sees the light. It has two choices: (1) deal with the pension crisis at home by raising rates to prevent defaults, or (2) keep rates low to save other governments in emerging markets who continue to borrow and are doomed anyhow. Then there is the question of whether the budget deficit in the USA will explode with rising rates.
The Fed has really lost control of the economy, but the mainstream still needs to figure this out. Our model goes nuts from 2018 into 2020. This is part of the peak in 2015.75. Of course, the general public does not see this yet. They should by next year and then the game will change.
Governments will not go quietly into the light. They will rage at every possible moment. They are moving toward electronic money since their solution is to force everyone to pay whatever tax they demand. On January 1, 2017, G20 will begin sharing info on everyone. Compliance in business will cost tens of billions of dollars alone. Even companies who do not have foreign clients will have to confirm they do not.
Naturally, governments will act in the most stupid manner for they will not reform. Even if they grab everything, it would not be enough to save them. So be prepared. They will get very punitive. Expect crazy laws to benefit them like constitutional amendments. They will find whatever excuse to confiscate assets; mere suspicion will become proof and it will be your burden to prove innocence.
The old guard is near death. People like John McCain and Barbara Boxer, who was shouted down in California by Bernie supporters, are out the door. We are looking at new people coming to power — the changing of the guard. In this respect, Trump is part of the new and Hillary is the old world of corrupt politics. We are turning the corner. Those in government remain clueless.
What survives is always tangible assets be it land, industry, shares, or something of value like gold, silver, antiques, etc. Whatever currency we use is only a medium of exchange between tangible assets. Currency is not “money,” it never holds its value, and by no means is it a store of wealth. It is just a medium of exchange like a language. So whatever we end up with, which I believe will be some basket of currencies, will become the new medium of exchange through which everything else is measured.
Trump & Interest Rates
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted May 21, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Martin– Your models seem to predict a Trump win. Given Trump’s stated preference for low interest rates, how does that jive with rates needing to go up to normalize things and save pensions in the next year or two? Would the Fed have to give in to President Trump?
Thanks!
RK
ANSWER: Keep in mind two things. First, the President has no power over interest rates. Secondly, neither does the Fed. The Fed at best can control short-term rates, but the entire QE was to try to influence the long-end. Additionally, whatever people say when running for office has no real bearing.
Furthermore, keep in mind we published that projection before Trump even announced he was running. So this has nothing to do with Trump personally or what he says or not and it should not be taken as an endorsement. One person cannot change the direction of the world alone. The reason Trump may win is that the Democrats are still in denial. The Republicans have had to swallow their pride. Trump has brought in millions of new people. Hillary has not. The Democrats have not figured out that the grass-roots are fed up with career politicians regardless of party. This disconnect within the Democratic Party has some speculating that the FBI will charge Hillary to clear the way for Biden. That would be a problem because Bernie supporters would get really pissed off. But this is the clash between the rulers and the great unwashed as they see us.
Trump is flexible. He will bend to the problem of pensions and agree that higher rates are needed. So I do believe Trump would be better at the economy for he would make decisions based upon private sector experience rather than theory and dogma from career politicians. Let’s face that much. We have not had anyone in politics with private sector experience for at least 85 years.
We are in a period of deflation right now which means people are hoarding cash and not spending rashly. They do not have confidence in the future so they are holding back plain and simple; saving for that rainy day. Everything goes nuts when they realize government is incapable of controlling anything.
Ann Coulter Discusses The Stakes of The Race…
Ann Coulter gets it and she is 100% right in her answers; the only point I would disagree with her on is that there is any chance that Hillary can win. Trump will win with a landslide has we have motivation and will put him in office.


