Posted originally on Jul 16, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
Some people are reporting that Japanese researchers were able to obtain vaccine and death records for 21 million people, and determined that those who died from MNRA came in “death waves” that took place 3-4 months after the injections, not right away. The data also reveal how long it takes for your death risk to return to normal, following a covid jab. This does not appear to be verifiable.
Data from Japan has been elusive. They definitely have the information infrastructure, seen in publications with amazing detail for population studies. It is a country of ~125M, and ~1.6M die every year. So 21M would be ~13 years worth of death data. I think it’s plausible that a researcher gets that much data. I’ve seen shoddy population-wide mortality calculations before, but my guess is Japan would grant access to someone with the necessary experience. And Japan has been under a decent amount of pressure to reveal details of its excess mortality:
Okada and Nishiura had a preprint released earlier this year with significantly smaller numbers for life expectancy in 2022 compared to 2021 or 2020. A paper chock-full of pandemic awareness, and notably, the one word most conspicuously absent: “vaccine.”
Also, out of the Japanese Medical Association (JMA) Journal: “Although Japan recorded the world’s highest rate of COVID-19 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccination doses per capita, COVID-19 cases and deaths exploded after the emergence of the Omicron variant, followed by a significant increase in excess deaths in 2022 and 2023. Although several hypotheses have been proposed to explain these phenomena, the truth remains to be established because sufficient studies and data disclosures have not been conducted to adequately investigate the possible contribution of mRNA vaccines.”
Even I must to admit, I received inquiries when some heard I refused to be vaccinated to my surprise. I am cautious even with my dogs. Traditional rabies vaccines have been effective for decades, but advancements in biotechnology are introducing new options.
One such innovation is the mRNA-based rabies vaccine for dogs, which enhances protection and improves production. Why change something that has worked for decades if it is not broken? Make more money? Rabies in dogs has been largely eradicated in the United States. Yet the producers of vaccines have succeeded in making it a law that dogs must be vaccinated. I demand to know who makes any vaccine before they inject my dogs.
Posted originally on Jul 15, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
The Data (Use and Access) Act, also known as the DUA Bill, has provided the UK government with the ability to roll out a series of programs that will eventually force citizens to participate in a digital ID program. The law was enacted with the premise of reinforcing security and providing convenience for businesses and individuals, with the true goal of surrendering all data and control to government authorities.
The UK government has eased the public into the concept by launching digital verification services. Phase one enabled citizens to voluntarily create a digital identity to streamline the right to work and the right to rent procedures and provide access to age-restricted products. Phase two will create a foundation for Digital Verification Services (DVS) and government oversight of digital identities. Approved services will receive a trust mark to note that they have been verified by the government. The program is currently in a pilot phase but the government plans to move full speed ahead by the end of the year.
“This independent certification process has given lots of organisations across the UK economy the confidence to start accepting digital identity. In some parts of the economy though government or businesses need extra assurance, beyond the requirements in the trust framework, before a digital identity can be used,” the government noted, later adding, “We estimate that hundreds of thousands of right to work, right to rent and disclosure and barring checks each month are now taking place using digital identity services providers; but that’s just the small step towards a much bigger transformation we want to enable through our work.”
In two years, after people are accustomed to creating and using their digital identity, the government plans to launch a digital wallet (GOV.UK Wallet) that will store citizens’ official government-issued documents. The Home Affairs Committee launched an inquiry into the risks associated with this digital ID, with industries and watchdog services raising a red flag over concerns regarding government overreach and surveillance. Critics are also concerned about the true security measures a centralized database could offer as data breaches and unauthorized access are possible. The initial attempt to create GOV.UK failed and cost the government £200 million and there is no currently publicly disclosed total cost of the plans to create a new version.
Government never implements a policy without expansion. There are already discussions of incorporating tax information into GOV.UK in the future, for example. Digital ID is not about convenience. It’s about CONTROL. The entire agenda is to monitor everything you do, say, and spend in real-time. They need Digital IDs to enforce CBDCs. Without it, they can’t control how you spend money. Every nation will attempt to create its version of a digital ID before they are combined into one centralized database, per United Nations guidelines. There will be public resistance toward these systems as government trust erodes. The plan will never be voluntarily repealed once implemented and overreach will expand until all freedoms are forcibly surrendered.
Posted originally on Jul 3, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
The biological warfare unleashed on the global population should not be a forgotten war. A new study observed miscarriages and pregnancy losses among mothers-to-be who received the COVID-19 vaccination during gestational weeks 8-13 and 14-27, respectively. Researchers also noted the impact on unborn babies of mothers injected with the influenza vaccination as a comparison.
The Israeli study analyzed 226,395 pregnancies and found that 1.1% of women lost their babies when given the COVID-19 vaccination after week 24 of pregnancy. An alarming 2.7% of women who received a COVID-19 vaccination in the early weeks of pregnancy suffered the loss of a pregnancy. The study also factored in expected losses due to natural events. Those who received dose 1 during 8-13 weeks experienced a higher-than-expected number of fetal losses of approximately 18 vs. 9 for every 100 exposed pregnancies.
Most pregnancy losses occurred after gestational week 20, with half of deaths happened after week 25. Mothers who received dose three of the vaccine during weeks 8 to 13 exhibited a higher-than-expected number of fetal deaths with nearly 1.9 (95% CI: 0.39-3.42]) additional fetal losses above expected per 100 pregnancies.
How does this compare to the typical influenza vaccination? Women vaccinated during weeks 8 to 27 of pregnancy exhibited a lower-than-expected number of fetal losses. Those who received the flu vaccine in weeks 8 to 13 had fewer losses of around 5 per 100 women vaccinated. The study also attributed this to health vaccine bias as those who received the influenzas vaccine were likely to be healthy to begin with and cleared by their doctor rather than forced by their government.
Israel has one of the highest global rates of vaccination, and although they did not issue a blanket mandate, the government provided the vaccinated with a “green pass” while shunning the others from accessing public venues. The Israeli Ministry of Health, along with every other health agency, urged pregnant women to receive the COVID-19 vaccination and explicitly advised all pregnant women in their second and third trimester to take the mRNA vaccine. The government found that women were most likely to take the untested vaccine if their physician recommended doing so. Every tactic to coerce the population into willingly accepting the vaccine was unleashed.
The Israeli Ministry of Health continues to recommend that pregnant women accept the vaccination, and if their babies survive, they can begin to take the COVID-19 vaccinations at 6 months of age. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the HHS in the United States changed their recommendations in recent months and no longer encourage healthy pregnant women to take the vaccine, likely solely due to Robert F. Kennedy Jr becoming the HHS Secretary.
Today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule. Bottom line: it’s common sense and it’s good science. We are now one step closer to realizing @POTUS’s promise to Make America Healthy Again. pic.twitter.com/Ytch2afCLP
“As of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule,” Kennedy said in May 2025. “Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children.”
The COVID-19 vaccination was never a medical necessity. There were no tests or studies conducted. Global governments aligned to attack the global population with an experimental vaccine that they insisted was safe and effective.
In early 2021, the entire European Union was under lockdown. Governments were prohibiting citizens from participating in society without the vaccination, and the EU’s largest supplier at the time, AstraZeneca, was unable to meet production needs. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen awarded Pfizer a €35 billion contract, personally, bypassing the proper channels in an apparent conflict of interest. Not only was she responsible for negotiating the deal, but she was also responsible for implementing the protocols.
In a backdoor deal, Von der Leyen negotiated the lucrative agreement directly with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla on her personal cell phone, bypassing the traditional processes in place for transparency. Pfizer then became Europe’s leading supplier of the COVID-19 vaccine and was awarded €35 billion in public funds. All of this was done secretly and highlighted the immense power that Ursula had amassed through a growing centralized government–she is no longer pretending that there is a democracy in the EU. There were Hillary’s emails, and now there are Von der Leyen’s text messages to Bourla.
The New York Times journalist Matina Stevis-Gridneff first broke the story in April 2021, revealing that Bourla and Von der Leyen had been personally corresponding for a month before the EU, represented by Ursula alone, awarded Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, the bloc’s first regulatory approval. The contract provided the EU with 900 million doses through 2023, with the option to order an additional 900 million.
Matina Stevis-Gridneff submitted a request to the European Commission for access to the text exchanges but was denied. The EC claimed they did not have access to those messages. Although she brokered a deal to provide billions in taxpayer funds to an American corporation, the court maintained that the public was not entitled to view those messages or know the nature of the deal. This completely eroded public trust and confidence, at least for those who were paying attention, and especially for those who witnessed the significant power the EU had usurped over member nations.
The case later went to the EU’s General Court, which concluded that the European Commission’s claim that it did not possess the requested text messages demonstrated a lack of credibility and transparency, declaring that those messages should be considered official EU documents. “The public has a right to know how this deal was made, and that includes text messages with the Pfizer CEO,” the court ruled. Watchdog groups hailed the ruling as a victory for transparency.
There are now members of the European Parliament who believe she should step down from her position due to the ordeal. Romanian MEP Gheorghe Piperea plans to collect the required 72 signatures and submit a no-confidence motion. Over two-thirds of MEPs present would need to collectively vote to remove von der Leyen, which could prove difficult as she secured the support of 401 of the 720 members during the last election. However, her popularity is waning, and politics are increasingly divisive. The bureaucrats in the European Union wield immense power over all member nations to the point that individual European countries have no sovereignty.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 