Trump Warns US Companies There Will Be “Consequences” For Outsourcing Jobs


Tyler Durden's picture

Emboldened by his “victory” with Carrier Corp, which agreed to keep 1,100 workers in the US instead of outsourcing them to Mexico in exchange for $7 million in tax incentives over 10 years, as part of his victory tour in Indiana, Donald Trump on Thursday warned that U.S. companies will face “consequences” for outsourcing jobs overseas.

“Companies are not going to leave the United States any more without consequences. Not going to happen,” the President-elect said on a visit to a Carrier Corp plant in Indianapolis cited by Reuters.


U.S. President-Elect Donald Trump speaks at event at Carrier HVAC plant in
Indianapolis, Indiana.

Trump, did not elaborate just what the consequences would be but during the election campaign he frequently threatened U.S. firms that his administration would put a 35% import tariff on goods made by American manufacturers who moved jobs offshore. As part of his “Make America Great Again” campaign, Trump has made keeping jobs in the US one of the main aspirations of his election campaign and frequently slammed Carrier for planning to move production to Mexico as he appealed to blue-collar voters in the Midwest.

Trump said his negotiation with Carrier would serve as a model for how he would approach other U.S. businesses that are tempted to move jobs overseas to save money – which likely means providing further tax concessions in exchange for keeping workers in the US.

In laying out the “carrot”, Trump also pledged to create a healthy environment for business via lower taxes and fewer regulation: “I just want to let all of the other companies know that we’re going to do great things for business. There’s no reason for them to leave any more,” Trump said.

Should the carrot fail however, there is a “stick” and Trump warned that If that approach did not work, there would be penalties.


U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and Vice-President Elect Mike Pence tour the

Carrier factory in Indianapolis

The Carrier deal marked a quick, and high profile win for Trump, who has spent most of his time since the Nov. 8 election in New York building his team ahead of the handover of power from President Barack Obama.

Arriving early in the afternoon, Trump toured the plant in Indianapolis and shook hands with workers on an assembly line. Some workers yelled out “Thank you Mr. Trump” and “Thanks Donald” as he greeted them. Carrier confirmed that Indiana agreed to give the company $7 million in tax incentives. A source briefed on the matter said the tax incentives are over 10 years and the company has agreed to invest $16 million in the state, which is run by Governor Mike Pence, Trump’s vice president-elect.


Donald Trump greets a worker as he tours a Carrier factory with Greg Hayes,
CEO of United
Technologies in Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S., December 1, 2016.

Trump’s victory however was not without blemishes: Carrier still plans to move 600 jobs from the plant to Mexico, the Wall Street Journal said. Reuters reported earlier this week Carrier also still intends to close a factory in Huntington, Indiana, that employs 700 people making controls for heating, cooling and refrigeration and move the jobs to Mexico by 2018.

* * *

And while Trump was enjoying the first stop of his victory parade, he was slammed by Bernie Sanders who, in a WaPo op-ed, warned that the Carrier deal is incomplete and leaves the incoming Trump administration open to threats from companies, echoing a concern we noted last night.

Sanders’ concerns were actually quite valid, by highlighting the shift in the negotiating calculus between corporations and the new administration. In the very worst case, Sanders is right that companies will now feel empowered – with a vivid case study – to demand concessions in order to keep jobs in the US.

“Trump has endangered the jobs of workers who were previously safe in the United States. Why? Because he has signaled to every corporation in America that they can threaten to offshore jobs in exchange for business-friendly tax benefits and incentives,” Sanders wrote in a Washington Post opinion piece on Thursday. He is not wrong. Sanders also noted that Trump had originally said he would save 2,100 jobs that Carrier planned to move to Mexico.

“Let’s be clear: It is not good enough to save some of these jobs,” Sanders said although it was unclear what his alternative – if any – would be to keep jobs in the US.

Sanders wasn’t the only one to slam the Trump deal. Moments ago, Reuters reported that according to a senior Mexican state official, Trump’s intervention to stop jobs at a plant in Indiana going to Mexico “is typical of what happens in countries that Americans call “banana” republics.”

Trump’s deal with Carrier created an “uncomfortable” situation for the company, and went beyond politicians’ remit, Fernando Turner, economy minister for Nuevo Leon, said in an interview. “It’s not our job. It’s up to companies to take their own decisions, not politicians; that’s what’s done in Latin American countries that they call banana (republics) in the United States,” he said, laughing.

“It’s not something that was done up until now in the United States. But anyway, things change.”

Turner also said that Mexico had not been a winner from NAFTA. The trade deal had both failed to lift Mexican economic growth and had cost the country millions of jobs, he argued. In that case, we can only add, since both the US and Mexico are against NAFTA it should probably be scrapped immediately.

“(Trump) is sending a message to (U.S.) workers, to unions that they don’t need to change, that everything is fine, that Mexico is the problem. But the problem is not Mexico,” Turner added. “They’re barking up the wrong tree.”

Still, Turner said Trump was “intelligent” and his ambition to grow the U.S. economy would benefit Mexico if it came off. “Trade between Mexico and the United States did not begin with NAFTA,” he said.

* * *

While it remains to be seen how Trump will deal with Mexico – whose ambassador to the US Carlos Manuel Sada Solana told the Arizona Republic that “we have said time and again Mexico is not paying for the wall” – Trump may have to to resolve other domestic issues first: despite Trump’s deal, employers elsewhere in Indiana are laying many more thousands of workers because of foreign competition. If Trump is indeed serious about them facing “consequences”, we may soon find out just what these will be.

How Trump Can Transform Education | Duke Pesta and Stefan Molyneux


Kansas judge rules Craigslist sperm donor isn’t on hook for child support for lesbian moms — Fellowship of the Minds


Well there is some sanity in the world

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

You want to be same-sex parents? Then suck it up and deal with the financial responsibilities that come along with that “right.” Via NY Post: A Topeka (Kansas) man who answered a Craigslist ad to donate sperm so two women could have a baby together is not legally the child’s father and isn’t required to […]

via Kansas judge rules Craigslist sperm donor isn’t on hook for child support for lesbian moms — Fellowship of the Minds

Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

The sad part is that the child is the one who will suffer from the indifference – no father.

kommonsentsjane

View original post

KOMMONSENTSJANE – HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE WON’T FLY THE U.S. FLAG AFTER BURNING THE FIRST ONE


Maybe arrested and tried as a terrorist as this is very anti American.

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

Our soldiers fight and die so that this president of this college can let the students remove the flag and then burn the flag.  Then the president of this college won’t fly the new flag.

Wounded warriors .

This is unbelievable.  The president of this college needs to be fired

Massachusetts College Stops Flying US Flag on Campus
Wednesday, November 23 – 9:43 PM CNN
Hampshire College, a liberal arts institution of about 1,400 students, has taken some heat after deciding not to fly the U.S. flag. A day after the presidential election, the Massachusetts college sided with students who lowered the flag to half-staff.

kommonsentsjane

View original post

KOMMONSENTSJANE – GROUNDED SURVEILLANCE OPERATION NABBED 110,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AT BORDER


There is only one reason you would stop something that is working and that is because you what the illegals and the drugs in the country. Since both create problems the only rational answer can be that the government wants the turmoil which means they are using this to fundamentally change the country and that is what Obama said he would do. I would say after 8 years he certainly did an outstanding job Saul Alinsky would be proud of him!

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

Grounded Surveillance Operation Nabbed 110,000 Illegal Immigrants at Border

Kenric Ward

November 30, 2016

The Operation Phalanx border program was shut down by the Obama administration.

sheriff

While surveillance helicopters were grounded in Texas, the head of Customs and Border Protection called the flights critical to “countering illegal immigration” from Mexico.

Records bear that out: A government report credited Operation Phalanx with apprehending 110,000 illegal border crossers.

CBP Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske stated in a Nov. 16 letter that Phalanx “provided tangible benefits to border security.” His letter to the Department of Defense was sent two days before it was revealed that CBP’s parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, had quietly halted border surveillance flights in Texas’ Laredo district.

U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, confirmed DHS’ move to shut down Phalanx, and lodged a letter of protest with DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson. The letter was co-signed by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott…

View original post 271 more words

KOMMONSENTSJANE – THE ELECTION BY COUNTY


That is why we are a Republic not a Democracy!

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

Having some problems with someone on Google Automattic tonight – they keep deleting words as I am typing.

November 30, 2016 4:07 PM

The Election by County

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.

Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.

There are 62 counties in New York State.

Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.

Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.

In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)

Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3, 797,000 square miles.

When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of…

View original post 48 more words

KOMMONSENTSJANE – KEITH ELLISON – THE WRONG MAN AT THE WRONG TIME


I hope they do pick him as it will make it that much easier for the rest of us to fix as the things the Dem’s have broken.

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

Keith Ellison – The Wrong Man at the Wrong Time

by Alan M. Dershowitz
November 30, 2016

What should a political party that has just lost its white working-class, blue-collar base to a “make America great again” nationalist do to try to regain these voters? Why not appoint as the new head of the party a radical left-wing ideologue who has a long history of supporting an anti-American, anti-white, anti-Semitic Nation of Islam racist? Such an appointment will surely bring back rust-belt voters who have lost their jobs to globalization and free trade! Is this really the thinking of those Democratic leaders who are pushing for Keith Ellison to head the Democratic National Committee?

Keith Ellison is, by all accounts, a decent guy, who is well liked by his congressional colleagues. But it is hard to imagine a worse candidate to take over the DNC at this time. Ellison represents…

View original post 823 more words

Tucker Carlson Interviews Goofy Jill Stein Campaign Manager About Election Recount…


Oof…  Take a large dose of obtuse double-speak, blend in a batch of cognitive dissonance, and bake at the highest possible level of moonbattery.

Source: Tucker Carlson Interviews Goofy Jill Stein Campaign Manager About Election Recount…

trump-standing-in-gap411221112

2nd Amendment Mandate


Self protection is the most fundamental right.

Stein’s Great Fraud – Even Obama Says “We Stand Behind Our Election Results.”


jill-stein-green-placard

QUESTION: Hi Marty, there is something circulated around that if the three states being hand recounted by Stein are not counted by Nov. 13th that the electoral votes from those states will be void and thrown out and giving the win to Hillary. How plausible is this?

N

ANSWER: That seems to be populated by Edward Foley, an expert in election law at Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University. That is very misleading. Yes the absolute deadline is Dec. 19th, 2016 when electors around the country must meet to cast their Electoral College votes. However, whatever the vote is on the 13th stands. Foley said: “That is a hard deadline and if a state were to miss that deadline, it would be technically in jeopardy of not having its electoral votes counted.” The likelihood of that would be below ZERO. A recount would by no means prevent that vote on the 19th. In fact, if the recount were not completed in time, then the people’s vote stands. Therefore, if the recount is not finished by the 13th, then the electors must vote accordingly.

If a state failed to vote by December 19th, you would really have a Constitutional Crisis that would compel the Supreme Court to enter. The people of that state would have just cause for bringing an action against the state officials and that could even be criminal. Moreover, the GOP would not allow that and stand ready to go to court.

The Green Party candidate Jill Stein has filed suit after Wisconsin declined to require county officials to recount the votes by hand, which is pointless especially when Pennsylvania is all electronic. What is she really doing? Her lawsuit could delay the process and she gets to keep all the money. Under state law, the recount must begin this week as long as Stein or another candidate pays the $3.5 million estimated cost of the recount by Tuesday. Meanwhile, Stein filed a lawsuit yesterday in Pennsylvania to force a recount there and her supporters began filing recount requests at the precinct level in Pennsylvania. She also plans to ask for a recount in Michigan on Wednesday.

By filing these suits, she must show clear and convincing evidence that the vote could change and there was some fraud. That really does not exit. She gets to keep all the money if she pretends to demand recounts but fails to get them. This appears to be a scam and without overturning all three states, nothing changes. Further proof that Stein is a con-artist is that even Obama has come out and said: “We Stand Behind Our Election Results.” This is the most dishonest scheme and on par with the corruption in politics. She only raised $3.5 million for her own election.

Stein is exploiting the nation for personal gain. Filing these lawsuits may actually prevent a recount, and then she can keep all the money and say she made a best effort as her site guarantees. This is really a total fraud and borders on criminal activity especially under consumer laws. She should be forced to return all money or go to jail. There is no evidence of such a fraud to warrant a recount and even Obama says there is no question about the vot