With both American and Russian forces engaged in the war its only a matter of time until American, Russian or both are killed by the other side in the fighting. It’s not a question of if it happens its a question only of when this happens.
Tag Archives: Benghazi
We the People
We, the people, have one last chance to save the Republic, that we set up and paid for with our blood in 1776, and it will be an uphill battle as the forces of darkness have made many inroads into American culture and society in an attempt to destroy us from within. This Fundamental Change to our country as was first articulated to us by Barack Husain Obama in 2008 was the culmination of a process started in 1965 as the Progressive element of the far left began to take over the old Democrat party and transform it into a Marist light party which had the goal of eliminating the US Constitution so they could than rule us. Some of the tools which seemed so innocent to start were Political Correctness (PC) and Hate crimes (an attack on free speech), gun control (an attack on person freedom), multiculturalism (an attack on American principles), social justice (an attack on free enterprise), and common core (an attack on real education and establishing propaganda instead). These were not all of the tools but all had one goal and that was to turn a Christian country of free men and woman into a country best described by George Orwell in his book 1984. Which is a society that almost exactly mirrors where we are today in America. Technically we are not there yet, but that is only because all the already passed laws (some hidden in other laws which is the purpose of 2,000 page bills) have not yet been implemented; that task, of the final implementation, was given to Barack Husain Obama and he has done an excellent job of taking us to the point of no return.
Some resistance was shown in 2010 and 2014 by the newly risen Tea Party but forces were quickly put in play to minimize the counter revolution that was taking place as the citizens resented what was being done to them. The traitorous actions of the US Supreme court in a number of rulings on religion, health care and marriage over the last 7 years has shown that the forces aligned again us are in all three branches of the federal government and they will do anything to create the country that they, not us, want.
The Tea Party (anyone that believes in the Constitution) has two enemies the Democrat Progressive Left (DPL) and the GOPe (the RNC establishment) which are really only one enemy as the GOPe and the DPL really make one party since they ALL want to be “rulers” and create an American oligarchy (Ruling Cass) as defined by Angelo Codevilla in his book “The Ruling Class” that I will call the ARC here. In the current race for the presidency the ARC have 3 enemies: Donald Trump, Ben Carson and Ted Cruz and the ARC along with their stogies in the media will do everything they can to destroy these three candidates, but concentrating on Trump as he is in the lead. The GOPe faction of the ARC will even support democrats (and they have in the past) to do their best to see that no Tea Party candidate can win.
It is imperative that we, the Tea Party, do not let any of the GOPe faction of the ARC candidates (all of them besides the Trump, Carson, Cruz team) win the Republican nomination but especially Jeb Bush and since Trump is now the defacto Tea Party candidate, and he is the one most likely to do what is right, we must support him no matter how hard the ARC tries to destroy him. Ideally Carson and Cruz would drop out and support Trump, which would totally destroy the Karl Rove Hummingbird plan.
If I were Trump what I would do right now is purchase a million base ball caps from an American company and have on them embroidered “Make America Great Again” and give them away at every rally and town hall he speaks at. Since the people love him and his plain talk they will wear them and soon it will be hard to see a group of people anywhere that aren’t wearing Trump’s cap; if done this would guarantee him the 2016 election and it might save the Republic.
Eidelberg writes eloquently on why the Muslim’s do what they do and by extension, if we do not adapt, we will also all be Muslims by the end of this century, maybe sooner..
The Poodles Among Us
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
In his 2002 foreword to Raphael Patai’s 1973 classic, The Arab Mind, Norvelle B. de Atkine writes: “This book … forms the basis of my cultural instruction, complemented by my own experiences of some 25 years living in, studying or teaching about the Middle East.”
De Atkine notes that “officers returning from the Arab world describe the cultural barriers they encounter as by far the most difficult to navigate, far beyond those of political perceptions. Thinking back on it, I recall many occasions on which I was perplexed by actions or behavior on the part of my Arab hosts—actions and behavior that would have been perfectly understandable had I read The Arab Mind.”
To speak of Arabs is to speak of Muslims, for Arab culture is permeated by Islam. Islamic hatred of America and of Israel is more intense and more widespread today than it was in 1973. American pop culture and commercial imperialism constitute a threat to the Arab’s tradition-based society, and Muslims see Israel as America’s vanguard in the Middle East.
Patai, says de Atkine, does not deny the virtues of Arab culture. “The hospitality, generosity, and depth of personal friendships common within the Arab world are rarely encountered in our more frenetic society. The Arab sense of honor and of obligation to the family—especially to the family’s old and young members—can be contrasted to the frequently dysfunctional family life found in our own society…”
But such is the burning hatred Arabs bear toward Jews that many willingly used their own children as human bombs, while the Arab street cheers such barbarism. Hatred trumps love. Arab hatred was not born with the Balfour Declaration or the establishment of the State of Israel. It precedes Muhammad and remains deeply ingrained in Arab culture.
Patai quotes Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), the greatest historian ever produced by the Arabs. Khaldun’s portrait of Arab national character is that of a historian who could look back on seven centuries of Arab history.
The Arabs, he says, “are people who plunder and cause damage.” The civilizations they conquer are “wiped out.” “Places that succumb to the Arabs are quickly ruined.”
“The reason for this is that [the Arabs] are a savage nation, fully accustomed to savagery …” “Savagery has become their character and nature. They enjoy it because it means freedom from authority and no subservience to leadership. Such a natural disposition is the negation and antithesis of civilization.”
“Because of their savagery,” saysatai, “the Arabs are the least willing of nations to subordinate themselves to each other, as they are proud, ambitious, and eager to be the leader.” (Recall Genesis 16:12 on the character of Ishmael: “He will be a rebel. His hand will be against everyone, and everyone’s hand will be against him.”)
The Arab’s sense of honor is notorious. Any insult or injury, let alone defeat in war, must be avenged. The Yom Kippur War was nothing less than an act of revenge for Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War—and that is why the war was launched on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar.
Any bellicose people are well-practiced in deception; as for the Arabs, however, one must add they are unequalled in the art of ingratiation. Khaldun’s disciple, Taqi al-Din Ahmad al-Maqrizi (1364-1442), an Egyptian, writes that Egyptians “are extremely inclined to cunning and deceit, from their birth they excel in it and are very skillful in using it, because there is in their character a basis of flattery and adulation which makes them masters in it more than all the peoples who have lived before them or will live after them.”
Egyptian President Anwar Sadat’s campaign of deception before the Yom Kippur War is documented in my book Sadat’s Strategy. But he was also a master of ingratiation. He constantly referred to Secretary of State William Rogers, whom he had met for the first time, as “Bill.” When Secretary Kissinger replaced Rogers, he became “dear Henry” just as quickly.
Countless pundits were deceived by Sadat. A few quotes may dispel their naiveté. In an interview with al-Anwar on June 22, 1975, Sadat said: “The effort of our generation is to return to the 1967 borders. Afterward the next generation will carry the responsibility.”
In a New York Times interview dated October 19, 1980, he boasted: “Poor Menachem [Begin], he has his problems … After all, I got back … the Sinai and the Alma oil fields, and what has Menachem got? A piece of paper.”
A year after signing the March 1979 peace treaty with Israel, Sadat ominously declared: “Despite the present differences with the Arab ‘rejectionist’ rulers over the Egyptian peace initiative, the fact remains that these differences are only tactical not strategic, temporary not permanent.”
By the way, in his Knesset speech of November 20, 1977, Sadat used the name of God 10 times in his first ten sentences. Surely a man of God would not lie about his desire for “peace”—a word he used 95 times in his 50-minute performance!
With astonishing insight, Ibn Khaldun points out that “The Arab can obtain authority only by making use of some religious coloring, such as prophecy or sainthood, or some great religious event in general.”
Patai’s 1973 classic, says de Atkine, “has not aged at all. The analysis is just as (prescient and on-the-mark now [in post-9/11, i.e., September 11, 2001]) as on the day it was written. One could even make the argument that, in fact, many of the [Muslim Arab] traits described have become more pronounced.”
Israeli politicians and diplomats are children compared to the likes of Muslim leaders like Palestinian chief Mahmoud Abbas. Benjamin Netanyahu’ ardent desire to negotiate with Abbas would be laughable if it did not have tragic consequences.
Despite Israel’s overwhelming military power, Israel has been retreating toward her indefensible 1949 borders. Like other Israeli leaders, even a savvy politician like Netanyahu has been one of the Arab’s Jewish poodles. Isn’t there an alternative?☼
The GOPe Plan If You Remove Donald Trump….
The Tea Party (anyone that believes in the Constitution) has two enemies the Democrat Progressive Left (DPL) and the GOPe (the RNC establishment) which are really only one enemy as the GOPe and the DPL really make one party since they ALL want to be “rulers” and create an American oligarchy (Ruling Cass) that I was call the ARC. In the current race for the presidency the ARC have 3 enemies: Donald Trump, Ben Carson and Ted Cruz and the ARC along with their stogies in the media will do everything they can to destroy these three candidates. The GOPe will even support democrats (and they have in the past) to ensure that no Tea Party candidate can win.
It is imperative that we do not let any ARC candidate (all of them besides the Trump, Carson Cruz team) win the Republican nomination and since Trump is now the defacto candidate, and he is the one most likely to do what is right, we must support him no matter how hard the ARC tries to destroy him. Ideally Carson and Cruz would drop out and support Trump, that would totally destroy the Humming bird plan.
Morning Consult National Poll – Donald Trump Commanding Lead 31%…
So Trump is at 31% and all of the GOPe candidates are, in total, also at 31% (average 6% each) and the media is asking trump when he is going to drop out since he is losing ground? What am I missing here?
Politicians have always been corrupt the difference today is the citizens are corrupt as well, wanting more and more for free!
Money & Politics: The Corrupt System is Starting to Come to a Head
It was very refreshing to watch Dylan Ratigan lose it on TV when discussing the corrupt political system. Ratigan reminds viewers that our corrupt politicians, who are bought and paid for by special interest groups, are the reason why our government is incapable of accomplishing anything. The president cannot serve more than two terms, so why do we tolerate judges and members of Congress who serve for life? We must be totally insane.
CNN’s Jake Tapper Caught Lying and Displaying Anti-Trump Bias on Twitter…
Of course they cherry pick how else could they get the questions that they ask? That is why CNN is where it is and others are much higher, for if Fox doesn’t straighten out they will lose there ratings as well as they have turned against Trump as well.
What Trump needs to do now is have a million base ball caps made in a lot of colors that say Make America Great Again. and then give them away every place he goes. You would soon see them everywhere.
If No One Else Will Ask Obama This, I WILL…
When you have a fool running a military operation the results will almost never be good! Further they will almost always be a disaster.
[On the bombing of the hospital run by Doctors Without Borders in Afghanistan]
This incident underscores two very important questions for our Commander in Chief. Why would we have Afghans calling in close air support of our assets? And how do we define close air support — and what type of assets do we have to conduct the mission?
Close air support is the implementation of air assets in conjunction with ground troops in contact with the enemy. It involves the use of ground tactical air controllers (GTACs) or, at a minimum, someone who’s been trained in directing close air support. As a young artillery officer at Ft. Sill, Oklahoma, we all had to qualify on calling in a close air strike coordinating artillery smoke to direct/vector in aircraft. And our Special Operations forces are all trained in the employment of close air support. We know the enemy was occupying a hospital and directing fires against our forces…
View original post 217 more words
Desperate Fox Punditry, and Establishment GOPe Advocates, Jump Shark on Trump “Eminent Domain” Comments…
A well thought out argument and right on, as indicated the only gray are is take property from a private owner and giving it to another private owner because it would generate more tax revenue. That is over the line without doubt but that is also not technically “eminent domain” either. If we use the “common Good” argument then there is also “no limit” to what the government can do as long as they claim its for the common good. Since the US Constitution and Bill of Rights was designed to “lmit” power the “common good” argument is on weak ground at best.
Donald Trump CNN Morning Interview: “I’m Not Going Anywhere – I’m Going To Win”…
Trump goes from 25% to 35% and Carly goes from 5% to 10% and Trump is asked when he is dropping out because Carly is gaining on him? So next time Trump is 45% and Carly is 15% and then the next time trump is 55% and Carly 25% and the last one is Trump is 65% and Carly is 35% so who won? And that wold be considered a landslide victory BTW.
Centinel2012 