War Fever in Europe Going Crazy


Posted originally on Apr 16, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Austrian War Posters

COMMENT: Dear Marty!

These are original advertising posters for war bonds from 1914-1918 from
the former monarchy. I thought this might be of interest to you.

Wein Museum

I took the photos myself here. I hereby grant you all rights for publication on your blog.

Many people all over the world owe you and your tireless efforts an enormous amount.

I am Austrian. We, my wife and sons of military age, their friends, and our first grandson, are going to Paraguay in South America. We’ve had permanent residence permits since 2017.

Very few people here in Europe want to know or acknowledge the terrible things that await them. Even if there is no war, the economic misery will be bad enough to make Europe a poor continent for a long time to come. Young people will have a very hard time building something for themselves here in Europe after 2030. I saw how people in the Eastern Bloc lived in poverty before the opening and even long after. Back then, they could go to Germany and other wealthy European countries. Germany and other formerly prosperous European countries will not be wealthy
after 2030. The prosperity and opportunities for development that you and I had in our youth will no longer exist here after 2030.

I live near Melk Abbey. Whenever you are in Austria, it would be a great pleasure and honor for me to show you the inside of the abbey and other historic sites in Austria. My old family connections within the monarchical system still work. Who knows for how long…

In deep gratitude for everything you do for us ordinary people and the burden you have placed on yourself.

Many thanks, GB

REPLY: Thank you. I see that we are all in this together. I the town I grew up, my grandfather had Germans who migrated to the US before the war for they saw what was coming. Down the street from my mother was another German couple who also migrated before the war. I remember listening to their stories and how they saw the political trend and tried to warn friends but they thought they were extremists. I think growing up with those German neighbors exposed me to the horrors of war and how they had to leave their homeland when many thought they were nuts.

OSCE Vienna Peace Conference

I spoke with an attendee of the OSCE Vienna Peace Conference last week. He said they were not talking about peace, but that everyone needs to start drafting people for war with Russia. The Neocons have used Zelensky as their puppet to start World War III, just as the Greens used that 16-year-old Gretta.

MA War Cycle 2011 WEC

I have heard from others now in Europe that the press ONLY talks up war, and anybody who speaks against war is just Russian propaganda. These forecasts have come from the computer. It is the only fully functioning AI system in the world with more than a 40-year track record. At the 2011 WEC, I warned that the war cycle would turn up in 2014. In 2013, I posted a post saying this would start in Ukraine.

Forecaster The Movie R 1

Nobody speaks to me in the middle of the night. I am not clairvoyant. Nobody has a track record that can match the forecast I have done over the decades. This is why they made the movie The Forecaster, and the sequel should be out soon. Then they are making a Hollywood movie about my career with class A actors like the Big Short, all to show that there is order to this chaos.

If it were just me, then there would be a shot of being wrong. It is not something I want to pound my chest and say, see I was right. I’d rather be wrong. My lawyer tells me I have to create a 501 (c) (3) to put Socrates into for if I died, the government would claim it’s worth several billion and demand inheritance taxes on such a value. My heirs would not have that type of cash so the government would seize it in the end. To a large extent, this has been my burden.

So, to those people who think it’s just my opinion, they remind me of Bob Dylan’s song “It Ain’t Me Babe.”

New York University Encourages Student Protests


Posted originally on Apr 16, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

StudentBrainwashedCollege

Beginning with Barack Obama, the last true leader of the Democratic Party, every liberal affiliate is encouraging civil unrest. Washington has cut funding to universities that permit pro-Hamas rallies, but that has not deterred these organizations from permitting protests to continue. New York University is not merely permitting protests but encouraging them. In fact, they are urging white students to use “white privilege” to heighten the unrest.

The university created a “Protest Tips and Resources” page on its website to outline “Best Practices for Protesting Safely.” NYU claims that these protests are  “especially for Black and Brown people” and they encourage white students to “[u]se white privilege to protect others.”

I believe it is important to highlight what the Democrats are encouraging young, impressionable students to do to support their cause. “You have the right to peacefully assemble — however, there have been many situations in which college protests have escalated to the point of arrest,” one article reads, followed by telling students to prepare for jail.

Sign up for jail support if available. Even if you don’t anticipate you will need to sign up for jail support, protesting may involve interaction with law enforcement. It is best to be safe and share your emergency contacts with organizers just in case. Write important phone numbers, such as a family member or emergency legal counsel, on your arm should you need it later and not have access to your phone.”

No where do they explain the severity of arrests ending up on a person’s permanent record beyond the school, where they could be denied for future employment opportunities or worse. These people are openly encouraging students to prepare for arrest before attending a protest. They are willing to use students as human shields to promote their agenda since those pulling the strings certainly do not want to risk arrest.

The DEI courses teach that having a white savior complex is harmful, but in the case of promoting liberal policies, white knighting is encouraged. White students have been asked to take on the bulk of the legal responsibility since they believe the legal system will unfairly punish brown and black students.

Using young adults fresh out of high school as political shields is abhorrent. These students do not understand the true legal consequences that will come from the “sacrifices,” as Obama worded it, that the Democrats are encouraging them to take on to promote an agenda that they likely won’t support in a few years when they’re living in the real world.

“He Doesn’t Have A Right To Be Here” Jack Posobiec On The Maryland Man Deportation Hoax


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 14, 2025, at 6:00 pm EST

Idiot Smashes Her Face Into a Lamp Post Trying to Flee The Cops


Posted originally on Rumble By The Salty Cracker on: Apr 12, 2025 at 10:00 pm EST

Romanian Politician Georgescu Accuses Blinken and Macron of Barring Him from Presidential Election


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Apr 13, 2025 at 7:00 pm EST

AfD Becomes Most Popular Party in Germany


Posted originally on Apr 14, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

AfD logo

Germany has sought to ban the AfD Party as Democracy has no place in the European Union and they are the sole party combatting the European globalist agenda. I reported in January when AfD became the second-most popular party in the nation. Recent polls now indicate that AfD has surpassed the Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union to become the most popular party in Germany.

Ispos poll shows that a quarter of the nation now backs AfD, a 4 point rise from February. The Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union fell to 24% from 28.6%. Backing for the Social Democratic Party continued its decline and now stands at at 15%. The left-wing Linke Party advanced 2 points to 11%, while the Greens remained relatively stagnant at the same level of support.

This is a remarkable achievement as a nationalist party has not led in the polls since the founding of the current Republic of Germany. “For the first time in the AfD’s short history, we are the strongest party in Germany. Thank you for your tremendous trust — political change will come!” AfD Co-Chairwoman Alice Weidel posted on X. “Citizens want political change — not a ‘business as usual’ coalition between the CDU/CSU and SPD!” she later wrote.

There is a correlation with AfD’s growing support and the number of undocumented migrants infiltrating the German welfare state and causing crime to skyrocket. AfD has vowed to restore Germany for the people of Germany and implement mass deportation campaigns. The group does not want to adhere to the EU’s open border policy or the Build Back Better agenda. The party has called for a “remigration” or mass deportation operation similar to what Trump is currently conducting in the US.

Europe’s open border policies began in Germany under former Chancellor Angela Merkel, who urged Syrians to flee and seek asylum within Germany in 2015. That same year, Germany experienced a massive uptick of 2.14 million arrivals. Other figures believe the number is far higher. There are now an estimated 14 million immigrants in Germany, most of whom are not there legally.

I have stated many times that Angela Merkel created this entire mess in 2015 to reverse her polls when they were turning against her because of her hard line against Greece, which had forgiven Germany’s debt at the end of the war. Violent crimes in Germany reached a 15-year high last year, a 5.5% YoY rise, and MIGRANTS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR 40% OF THOSE CRIMES.

The cost on the welfare state is astounding. Germany spend at least 23.2 billion euros on supporting refugees last year after spending 29.7 billion euros the year prior. In fact, the government as admitted to spending over 20 billion euros each year since open borders were implemented. We are talking about over 5% of the federal budget going directly toward illegal residents.

Every article in the mainstream media calls AfD a far-right extremist hate group, therefore demonizing the 25% of the population who agrees with their values. Nationalist sentiments are rising throughout Europe, much to the dismay of the bureaucrats. All of this is unfolding right on schedule.

Left Stays Silent After Attack on Pregnant Tesla Driver


Posted originally on Apr 14, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

LeftistViolence

The violence against Tesla owners has gone too far. Left-leaning politicians have done nothing to stop the ongoing attacks by deranged individuals who believe they are “activists.” Nazi swastikas are appearing on Teslas throughout the world, while other vehicles are being set on fire. Now, these psychopaths have resorted to attacking people while driving.

pregnant woman in Vancouver was driving a Tesla when a large rock shattered her front windshield. The rock was thrown so hard that it went through the windshield and hit the pregnant woman. “We are working to determine whether this was a criminal act, and if someone intentionally targeted this Tesla,” said Vancouver police spokesman Sgt. Steve Addison. “This very serious incident could easily have resulted in someone’s death, but for a few inches.” There have been over 28 attacks on Teslas in Vancouver alone since Trump took office on January 20.

The woman was taken to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Police declared that she and her unborn baby, a life not recognized by the left, could have died as a result of the attack. Other drivers on the road could have been injured. What more will it take for politicians on the left to WAKE UP and DEMAND A STOP TO THE VIOLENCE!

Instead of condoning the violence, politicians are asking the people to raise hell to mislead the world into believing that the people do not support Donald Trump or those in his administration like Elon Musk. No politician on the left will declare these attacks an act of terrorism. Yet, bomb squads have been called to homes and businesses. Fire departments have been on high alert. There have even been cases of gunshots fired into office buildings.

Pelosi Schumer Black Lives

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) spent years condemning January 6. She accused Trump of stoking continued violence” and enticing a terrorist mob into a “violent assault” that left her with “physical scars and emotional trauma.” Yet, as we know from her own daughter’s documentary, Pelosi herself called off the National Guard that day to encourage the riot.

A reporter recently asked Pelosi to comment on the Tesla attacks.  “I’m so sorry, I’m a little bit late here right now,” was her only reply. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) also refused to provide a comment to reporters that day, but later issued a statement on his website to condemn the victims. “There are legitimate ways in a civilized society to express strong disagreement with far-right extremists who are trying to dismantle the American way of life. Violence is never acceptable,” Jeffries wrote.

rioters_tipped_car_300_clr_12700

Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) has refused to call the attacks “violent.” Bernie Sanders is perhaps the only Democrat to call the attacks violent, but refuses to declare them acts of terrorism. “I don’t know what domestic terrorism is in this context. It’s outrageous. People have the right to protest [Elon] Musk and Tesla, but no one should engage in violence, period,” Sanders said. “Boycotts are common, but violence must cease. It should not be part of our national dialogue.”

The Oxford Dictionary states “terrorism” is defined as “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.”

In Canada where the aforementioned incident occurred, terrorism is defined as the following:

“In Canada, section 83.01 of the Criminal Code defines terrorism as an act committed "in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause" with the intention of intimidating the public "…with regard to its security, including its economic security, or compelling a person, a government or a domestic or an international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act."

The US FBI defines terrorism as:

“Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.”

The ongoing viciousness toward Tesla owners are TERRORISM by every definition—politically motivated acts of violence.

Wisconsin Teen Allegedly Murdered Parents in Deranged Plot to Assassinate Trump


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Apr 12, 2025 at 11:00 pm EST

Debased Democrats Cheer MS13 Gangbanger’s Return to US Soil


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Apr 12, 2025 at 1:00 pm EST

The Process Matters When Confronting the Deep State


Posted originally on CTH on April 12, 2025 | Sundance

Regarding the recently released Russiagate files. Again, emphasizing that process matters, let me explain how and why we are being purposefully misled, even with Trump ‘allies’ in control of various govt agencies (silos).

Using the reference of the James Wolfe storyline, let me outline how process matters and how you can tell when the process is being used to coverup corrupt activity in Washington DC.

Former Senate Intelligence Community Security Chief, James Wolfe, leaked the Carter Page FISA application to journalist Ali Watkins. We know from the DOJ indictment of James Wolfe [SEE HERE], a very specific set of evidence and key dates that was assembled against him.

James Wolfe was nailed for lying to FBI investigators about his leaks to Ali Watkins on December 15, 2017.  That is the date of the second interview with Wolfe.  During the third interview a few days later, Wolfe was shown the evidence against him, and he admitted his lies.  However, his indictment was not unsealed until June 7, 2018.

Key Dates: Busted for guilt December 15, 2017.  Indicted June 7, 2018.

♦ The evidence against Wolfe included text messages between Senate Intel Vice-Chairman Mark Warner, and the lawyer for Oleg Deripaska, an attorney named Adam Waldman. The text messages were made public on Feb 8, 2018, [SOURCE] four months before Wolfe was indicted.

♦ The evidence against Wolfe included text messages between Wolfe and journalist Ali Watkins.  Ms Watkins was notified of her phone records being seized by FBI investigators on February 13, 2018, [SOURCE] again four months before Wolfe was indicted.

Why was this evidence, all of which would have been useful at trial, purposefully released by the Mueller investigation who was in charge of everything related to Russiagate at the time.

Shortly after James Wolfe was indicted, the Title-1 FISA application he leaked was then released to the public under the auspices of a FOIA request.  Wolfe indicted June 7, 2018, the FISA application released publicly July 21, 2018 [SOURCE].

RIGHT QUESTION:  Why was the evidence against James Wolfe being released to the public between the time the case was made (Dec ’17) and the time the indictment was unsealed (June ’18)?  Why wasn’t the evidence held until criminal trial processes began?

ANSWER: In hindsight we discover the Mueller team were in charge of the timeline because the Russiagate investigation superseded all other Main Justice outcomes and consequences.  The Mueller team were protecting the participants (Ali Watkins, Mark Warner, James Wolfe etc.), who all knew they were being investigated as a result of the Wolfe leak.

All of these players, including the media who received the FISA application from the Wolfe leak, knew they were tangentially and directly connected to the Wolfe investigation.  After Wolfe made his admission (December ’17), all of the collateral players knew they were at risk.

The FBI was notifying all stakeholders of the Wolfe admission, and Mueller’s team was helping to mitigate the consequences to those stakeholders.  How?  With controlled public releases of information.

Each of the corrupt actors had weeks, some even months, to hire lawyers, obfuscate the evidence of their involvement and formulate their defenses.  That’s why the information was being “released.”

The biggest single example of controlling damage and public opinion through the selective release of information was also the most brutally obvious, the July 21, 2018, release of the Carter Page FISA itself.

This was a Top-Secret Compartmented Intelligence document (TSCI). Directly related to a national security matter, and directly related to an ongoing investigation, and directly a component of the largest leak of top-secret classified information in decades.

The FISA itself was the easiest of all documents for the DOJ, FBI and National Security Apparatus to keep hidden from public view.  There was no court in America who would have ordered it to be released.  Quite simply, there was no reason for the DOJ to even consider releasing it; yet they did.

The Title-1 FISA application was released by Main Justice under the ridiculous justification of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) release.  Name me another TSCI document in the history of the Intelligence Community, that has ever been released under a FOIA (either before, or since); there simply isn’t another example.  Yet in the rush to review it, no one ever drew attention to this brutally obvious point.

The FISA was released shortly after James Wolfe was indicted, because everyone in the background network of the James Wolfe indictment, mainly the DOJ under Mueller team control, was operating to control information adverse to their interests.  The public release watered down the jaw-dropping leak itself.

[SOURCE]

Why visit this example again?  Because we are seeing a repeat of this pattern in the recently released Russiagate files.

If DC can frame negative information as politically motivated, DC can then avoid the unlawful and illegal activity underneath the information.  That is exactly what is happening, and that is why process is important.

If the bad actors in the silos want to remove the concern about illegal activity, they control release the information framing it as political in nature.

…”if the DOJ can claim evidence is political, it then nullifies the evidence and ends the case. This is why SD is pissed they handed this to that [willing] idiot Solomon.”…