First, thank you for the continued support. This is a highly unusual situation and far outside my comfort zone. Over the past several years, y’all know I have dug deep into the investigative weeds behind all things associated with the Trump-Russia madness and assembled a complex set of research and evidence materials that are very troubling.
From the outset, my goal was simply to ensure that investigative operations within the totality of government would be aware of the hidden evidence that is not supposition, but fact-based with direct evidence.
Obviously a secondary objective, given the nature of the material, was to ensure those in positions of power and influence would know that we know….. and that fundamental knowledge would mean they could not hide it.
If they do nothing, the least We The People deserve to know is who “they” are. Specifically who “they” are without equivocation.
Today at 2:00pm ET should be a conclusive point in that regard, as I am directly briefing those unknown and hidden people, actual badges, who have the power and authority to act. However, that said, I hold no confidence and/or trust toward them.
This has not been easy. Unfortunately, there exists a myriad of self-interests on an individual and institutional level who would not want this evidence to surface….. and so this odd game of briefing, obfuscation and intentional attempts to “not become aware” has been ongoing. That’s a bigger story for another day.
After several -seemingly- purposeful delays, and some expressions of good faith which I am not sure are actually ‘good’ or ‘faithful’, we come to this moment approximately an hour from now. The media, who I have briefed on the material, have been released from any/all prior confidences. Additionally, I have released the name of the primary investigator (deep behind the Durham probe) to the same media. If those media voices do nothing, I will share who they are… until then, I grant them benefit of courage and patriotism.
It’s time to start asking some very hard questions…. but in order to do that, these voices first needed to know the material so those questions could be asked; hence, the exhaustive travel for in-depth briefings in multiple cities and states.
Nothing is supposition; everything is connected to deep and direct evidence of corruption that covers a variety of interests and numerous institutions. The most adverse to sunlight are members of Mueller’s purposefully installed special counsel unit. After the Obama administration left office, Andrew Weissmann and crew took over. They did things that only Machiavellian thinkers could imagine. It will all come out; the question is when?
After another attempt to delay, I took a purposeful stance. Everyone reversed course and we are back on track.
Expect no help from the Senate; they were participants. Today’s released obfuscation and nonsense from the SSCI is evidence in that regard. The entire upper chamber is compromised; they know it, I know it, and a large part of the American electorate know it.
I dislike immensely not being able to just be the guy with a blog who outlines research material, provides the direct source information, and explains to people what is going on. Recent weeks/months have been challenging because when your goal is to extend benefit-of-doubt, you do not want to impede any truthful efforts. However, I have exhausted my ‘benefit-of-doubt‘ stash; I need to return to my original position: ‘THE TRUTH HAS NO AGENDA’.
QUESTION: Marty; Do you have an opinion of Millie Weaver’s Shadow Gate? Infowars has an exaggerated position in many areas. Would you care to comment on this position?
JH
ANSWER: I think all you have to do is watch the movie on Snowden and you will come to realize that clandestine schemes always run on the side by private contractors to give deniability to the main government agencies. This is pretty standard and has been going on for quite some time. However, remember the torture the US military engaged in overseas at Abu Ghraib?
In the summer of 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled on the habeas corpus submission Rasul v. Bush, determining that the court had jurisdiction over Guantanamo and that detainees had a right to an impartial tribunal to challenge their detention under habeas corpus. It was a landmark decision in detainee rights. The petitioners claimed that the US government’s decision to detain the prisoners indefinitely without charge and without judicial review was a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause. The government contended that the courts had no jurisdiction to hear the habeas claims since the men were not US citizens and were held outside of sovereign US territory.
The US government was torturing people routinely, claiming as long as what they did was outside the United States, they were operating outside any constraint by law. When they lost that argument, they turned to private contractors to do illegal acts. As long as they are not the government, they take the position that the government is not responsible even if it tells them to violate every human right possible.
This is the game. It is also well known in Washington. It was the bankers who blackmailed Yeltsin in a failed attempt to take over Russia back in 2000 with the blessing of the US government under the Clinton Administration (see: “The Forecaster”).
COMMENT: Millie Weaver was arrested right after she released the trailer for this movie. Trailer Sh@dowgate Millie Weaver,
Here is the original video on Infowars which has gone viral (Shadowgate Documentary) and of course the new anti-Free Speech organizations Facebook And YouTube removed the video as expected.
Love your work and admire your courage! You are 100% right about eastern Europeans are the canaries of today’s “coalmines” I am Hungarian living in Canada 37 years!
AG
REPLY: We do not know why she was really arrested. It was not for this video, or they would have pulled it but they are probably trying to discredit her given they cannot pull her video. They always try to discredit their target so that they can say why to believe someone who is obviously guilty so whatever she has done should not be trusted. That is the standard routine.
Nevertheless, they will typically craft charges on whatever they can and the truth NEVER comes into play. When Coxley led his March on Washington of the unemployed in 1894, they arrested him for walking on the grass. They immediately proclaim this had nothing to do with his protest march. It is always using the law to attack politically undesirables. What she has produced in her video is most likely the target in this case and you can bet that the prosecutor who obtained the indictment is a Democrat.
In my own case, we discovered that the Bank was illegally trading in our accounts just as we saw in M.F.Global how they were taking client funds for their own trading. They seized my company which was not in default with any clients. We threatened to sue the bank on August 30th, 1999 which would have stopped the takeover giving the bank 1 week to return missing funds or we would file suit. By that Thursday, the FBI raided our office.
Whatever tapes I had documented that people in the bank admitted they were taking money without my knowledge or consent out of our accounts or entries, that evidence magically all vanished and they claimed all evidence was destroyed in the World Trade Center building 7 which no plane ever hit. The tapes also exposed all the bank manipulations and paying bribes to various foreign government officials to manipulate markets. I found one copy in my mother’s basement after I was released.
My clients supported me and I instructed them to file suit against the bank. The government then put a lifetime gag order on me to prevent me from helping my own clients. You just can’t make up this stuff. The corruption in New York runs very deep right into the Judiciary.
The truth means absolutely nothing. Judge Lawrence McKenna was trying to protect me. The government went to the Chief Judge to have him removed. The court sealed the docket sheet so I could never find out how they removed the judge and sent my case to one who would do whatever the government told him to do.
You cannot imagine how corrupt the Federal Court System truly is. There is simply no way to even fix it. No banker has EVER been charged in New York no matter what they have done. Anyone else if they had done what M.F.Global had done would be in prison for life. This is a statue of how bad justice truly has become. When I was doing the tour for the movie the Forecaster, someone from the audience in Germany said this is typical of the United States. Two German lawyers jumped in and said this takes place in Germany all the time!
Whenever the government is in charge of prosecuting people, there is a risk of corruption and political prosecutions. When Socrates was put on trial in Athens, it was because he offended the gods. That was the only state crime. If someone murdered another, the duty to prosecute was that of the family – not the state. It was the Magna Carta which ended up creating a tyranny. The king lost revenue and fines were to be determined by a jury. This is when he changed the system. Suddenly a murder “disturbed” his peace of the king and he began to prosecute private crimes to raise revenue. By the time of the American Revolution, there were over 200 felonies which all carried DEATH. Why? If he could kill you, he would take all your assets and throw your family out on the streets. He would then engage in torture to force people to confess.
This is when John Lilburn stood up and protested that people should not be tortured to confess to crimes they did not commit. This became our 5th Amendment in the American Constitution – the right to remain silent. That right has been so watered down it has become a joke. They claim quickly you waive your right meaning you are constructively amending the Constitution and giving the government the right to torture you. What you argue the government should provide some benefit, the Supreme Court quickly rules the constitution is NEGATIVE because it is simply a restraint upon the government – not a positive right of any individual (see Harris).
Welcome to the real world. They will prosecute people on fake evidence, craft stories, and it is rare to find a judge who would actually defend you or the constitution. Unfortunately, we do not know the validity of any charges in the case of Millie. Because of her work, she is always going to be a target. Given how toxic this election is and how Bernie Sanders is saying day one under Biden all his proposals will be put in place, they are out for blood against anyone who stands up against them. In all socialist revolutions, they will typically gather those journalists who stand up and quietly they escort them to their grave. There is no way Millie will receive a fair trial – that much you can bank on.
The Democrats are deliberately trying to hurt the people in hopes that they will blame Trump. The basis for this approach is traditional during a recession, the President is defeated such as Hoover in 1932. What they are also doing is demanding bailouts for the Blue States to cover their own pensions. This is putting government employees above the people. As reported before, they have promised the Blue governors that if they keep the lockdowns and hurt the people enough to vote against Trump, they will bail out all the state employee pension funds which are broke. Indeed, the 2020 elections will be a monumental turning point in the United States if the Democrats win.
Hugh Hewitt is a terrible GOPe defender of all things associated with the Chamber of Commerce and Mitch McConnell. Hewitt is a total phony; so you know things are really bad when a lying liar who lies is calling out a fellow lying liar who lies.
A remarkable situation. WATCH:
.
As I have told numerous voices of familiarity to CTH viewers, if they don’t start getting really confrontational soon, they will lose all credibility. Some are catching on… Also, Hewitt isn’t really out on a limb here; even Johnson’s own staff will tell you the guy is only worried about the election. Everything else is fake, fake, fake.
CTH friend, researcher and producer John Spiropoulos helps connect the dots within the operation to cover-up corrupt activity by James Comey, Andrew McCabe, James Baker, Christopher Wray, Dana Boente and the entire special counsel group.
In this video John walks us through the internal evidence showing how the FBI intentionally hid the statements by Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source Igor Danchenko. The result…. a 34 month cover-up operation.
.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham released the declassified documents on July 17th. [Thank You John Ratcliffe] The documents relate to how the intelligence apparatus conducted surveillance abuses against the Trump campaign in 2016; and ultimately the Trump administration after the inauguration.
The first document [Direct pdf here] is the Washington Field Office (WFO) FBI briefing summary of a three day interview with Chris Steele’s primary sub-source. The document is highly redacted, but we already know from the IG release what the total content of the briefing revealed. The first interview was conducted on January 12, 2017, during the transition period between administrations. The classification term “SIA” stands for Source Identifying Attribute.
♦ This document not only demonstrates how unsubstantiated and unreliable the Steele dossier was, it shows that the FBI was on notice of the dossier’s credibility problems and sought two more FISA application renewals after gaining this awareness.
♦ The document reveals that the primary “source” of Steele’s election reporting was not some well-connected current or former Russian official, but a non-Russian based contract employee of Christopher Steele’s firm. Moreover, it demonstrates that the information that Steele’s primary source provided him was second and third-hand information and rumor at best.
♦ Critically, the document shows that Steele’s “Primary Sub-source” disagreed with and was surprised by how information he gave Steele was then conveyed by Steele in the Steele dossier. For instance, the “Primary Sub-source”: did not recall or did not know where some of the information attributed to him or his sources came from; was never told about or never mentioned to Steele certain information attributed to him or his sources; he said that Steele re-characterized some of the information to make it more substantiated and less attenuated than it really was; that he would have described his sources differently; and, that Steele implied direct access to information where the access to information was indirect.
In total, this document demonstrates that information from the Steele dossier, which “played a central and essential role” in the FISA warrants on Carter Page, should never have been presented to the FISA court. (Senate Link)
The inspector general already reviewed this briefing material and explained the content in the IG report on FISA Abuse in December 2019. Here’s the nub of that full review:
The aspect of the primary sub-source deconstructing and undermining the underlying material within the Steele Dossier is critical because ultimately the dossier underpinned the FISA application.
When you recognize the FISA application itself was based on a fraudulent premise; and you recognize the intentional ignoring of the underlying evidence; then the motive behind the FISA becomes clear. The FISA against Carter Page was used as a justification for surveillance of Donald Trump that had been ongoing by Obama intelligence officials.
This context becomes stunningly more important when you look at how the FISA was used by the Mueller investigation to continue its weaponization throughout 2017 and even into 2018. Remember, in July of 2018 long after the source material was debunked, the special counsel office was still telling the FISA court the predication for the FISA application and renewals was valid.
Drive this point home.
This is a key to understanding the scope of how weaponized the Mueller team was.
In July of 2018 the special counsel resistance group was lying to the FISA court in order to protect the cornerstone document that permitted them to weaponize the intelligence apparatus.
This letter was written July 12, 2018. It is NOT accidental that only a week later, July 21st, the special counsel released the FISA application under the guise of FOIA fulfillment.
Aside from the date the important part of the first page is the motive for sending it. The Mueller team running the DOJ is telling the court in July 2018: based on what they know the FISA application still contains “sufficient predication for the Court to have found probable cause” to approve the application. The resistance unit running the DOJ is defending the Carter Page FISA application as still valid.
On page #8 [Source Document Here] when discussing Christopher Steele’s sub-source, the special counsel group notes the FBI found him to be truthful and cooperative.
This is an incredibly misleading statement to the FISA court because what the letter doesn’t say is that 18-months earlier the sub-source, also known in the IG report as the “primary sub-source”, informed the FBI that the material attributed to him in the dossier was essentially junk.
By July 2018 the DOJ clearly knew the dossier was full of fabrications, yet they withheld that information from the court and said the predicate was still valid. Why?
It doesn’t take a deep-weeds-walker to identify the DOJ motive.
In July 2018 Robert Mueller’s investigation was at its apex.
This letter justifying the application and claiming the current information would still be a valid predicate therein, speaks to the 2018 DOJ needing to retain the validity of the FISA warrant…. My research suspicion is that the DOJ needed to protect evidence Mueller had already extracted from the fraudulent FISA authority. That’s the motive.
In July 2018 if the DOJ-NSD had admitted the FISA application and all renewals were fatally flawed Robert Mueller would have needed to withdraw any evidence gathered as a result of its exploitation. The DOJ in 2018 was protecting Mueller’s poisoned fruit.
If the DOJ had been honest with the court, there’s a strong possibility some, perhaps much, of Mueller evidence gathering would have been invalidated… and cases were pending. The solution: mislead the court and claim the predication was still valid.
♦ The FISA was also released in July 2018 in order to retain the false premise behind it. The copy that was released by the special counsel, through Rod Rosenstein, contained redacted dates because the special counsel needed to hide the fact the FBI (Washington Field Office) had actually used the FISA to catch a leaker of classified intelligence, James Wolfe.
Again, Wolfe’s story is the fulcrum…. tell that story and the House of Cards collapses like the Potemkin village it is. {GO DEEP}
The resistance lawyers in the Mueller team released the same initial FISA application (and first renewal) used to catch Wolfe; they had to release that specific March 17, 2017, copy. However, they had to redact the dates on the document they released because the dates were changed by SSA Brian Dugan to catch Wolfe.
The March 17, 2017, copy of the FISA, an FBI investigative equity, went into Main Justice with the leak trap visible. When the special counsel released the FISA application to Rosenstein for public FOIA fulfillment they had to redact the dates or people would ask questions about why this specific version had different dates than the original.
The March 17, 2017, copy of the FISA application is the only one to date that has been in the public sphere; including reviewed by OIG Michael Horowitz. That’s why when Horowitz originally released his FISA report, the OIG kept the dates redacted and only revealed them after the irrelevance of classification was pointed out.
The March 17th Wolfe copy of the first half of the full FISA application (original and first renewal), is the only copy that has ever been made public. If we were to ever see the modified and unredacted copy the FBI gave to Wolfe, the dates would not match with the actual dates of the application(s). The dates were used as part of the leak trace.
The Mueller team knew the explosive nature of the FBI investigation to catch the SSCI leaker. The Mueller team, with full control over Main Justice, was the group that buried FBI Supervisor Special Agent Brian Dugan’s explosive investigative findings.
Expose the conduct of this group and everything about the insurance policy falls into place:
Sidney Powell did an excellent job today representing the interests of her client Michael Flynn at the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Every client should be so fortunate. Following the hearing, Ms. Powell appears with Lou Dobbs to discuss the overall issues.
The Great Lou Dobbs represents the voices of millions in this interview as he shares his own perspective of outrage at the ongoing case. Terrific interview:
Today the United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit held a full panel hearing to decide the outcome of the unopposed DOJ and defense motion to drop the case against Michael Flynn.
If you ever read the indictment of SSCI Security Director James Wolfe [pdf HERE] you would notice how FBI Washington Field Office Supervisory Special Agent Brian Dugan conducted his leak investigation that ultimately led to James Wolfe.
As SSA Dugan explains his investigative process, he goes to great lengths to describe how he went to the FISA court to pick up a copy of the Carter Page FISA application on March 17, 2017. Agent Dugan then takes it to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence where he gave it to SSCI Security Director James Wolfe.
Simple Questions: Why did SSA Dugan go to the FISC to pick up a copy?
Why didn’t Agent Dugan just go to Main Justice and pick up a copy from the DOJ-NSD file that contained the FISA application? Why go to the FISA Court for a copy?
This is not supposition; this is the process described and outlined in court records. So, why go to the FISC and not the DOJ?
♦ Secondly, SSA Dugan goes to extreme lengths to draw attention to his copy; he calls the top secret FISA application an “FBI equity” in numerous documents. It’s his equity, his document, because he was the original equity holder of the document.
Agent Dugan was responsible for generating it. Dugan repeats that provenance again, and again in court records throughout 2018: “FBI Equity“.
The March 17, 2017, copy of the FISA application -as stamped by the FISA Court- was FBI Agent Brian Dugan’s equity. It was inside his investigative file.
This March 17, 2017, copy is his investigative work product.
So riddle me this… QUESTION:
When Main Justice DOJ (think special counsel) released the FISA application, under the auspices of a FOIA fulfillment, on July 21, 2018, why did they release FBI Agent Brian Dugan’s copy?
Why didn’t the DOJ release their clean copy of the FISA application?
Why did the DOJ find it necessary to release WFO FBI agent Brian Dugan’s equity?
Additionally, how did Main Justice get SSA Brian Dugan’s copy of the FISA?…. But more importantly, when the DOJ decided to release the FISA application to the public, why did they release FBI Agent Dugan’s copy?
The answers to these questions tell a big story.
Isn’t it curious how no-one has ever asked those questions?
This is interesting…. During the final question of his press conference President Trump forcefully outlined the names of key former administration officials who participated in the effort to remove him.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
From the outset, my goal was simply to ensure that investigative operations within the totality of government would be aware of the hidden evidence that is not supposition, but fact-based with direct evidence.
Centinel2012 