Allegations of Fraud – FBI Previously Investigated Fauci?


 

Flynn Case Update – Reviewing Missouri U.S. Attorney Provides Exculpatory Evidence Under Seal…


A very interesting development that could prove to be quite important.  Today Michael Flynn’s counsel received a letter from the DOJ notifying his defense the Missouri U.S. Attorney, who was brought in to review all of the evidence in the case, has delivered new evidence and information on the case filed under seal.  Here’s the letter:

Further reporting from Sean Davis at the Federalist gives some background on the sealed evidence that indicates the provided information is exculpatory.  According to Davis’s sources the internal investigative documents “will reflect poorly on the FBI.”

[…]  The new documents, which were filed under seal by the Department of Justice Friday, allegedly include exonerating evidence about Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators about his conversations with foreign diplomats as Trump’s top incoming foreign policy adviser and is currently attempting to withdraw his plea, as well as evidence of malfeasance by the FBI during its investigation of Flynn.

According to the FBI official who spoke to The Federalist, FBI general counsel Dana Boente led the charge internally against DOJ’s disclosure of the new materials. Boente, who briefly served as acting Attorney General after Trump became president, personally signed off on one of the federal spy warrants against former Trump campaign affiliate Carter Page.

The new documents, which were filed under a protective order by DOJ on Friday, will reflect poorly on the FBI, the official told The Federalist. It is not clear when, or even if, those documents will be unsealed and made available to the public for review. (read more)

It is very interesting that Davis’ source specifically cites FBI general counsel Dana Boente as a bad actor in this ongoing saga.  Apparently Boente tried to block the release of the information helpful to Michael Flynn and his defense team.  This is particularly important because it aligns with our own research and analysis.

Early on CTH identified Dana Boente as part of the problem.  Dana Boente was part of the group who advised Sessions to recuse. Boente later authorized the second renewal of the Title-one surveillance warrant and worked with James Comey. Boente then leaked his Comey notes to the media (MSNBC), essentially to support Comey’s narrative about Trump; and participated from within the FBI as legal counsel to Chris Wray who told everyone in July 2018 there was no political bias in the FBI…

But hey, everyone is going to bias training….. and pay no attention to the 40 FBI agents who were investigating an invisible Trump Russia-Collusion-Conspiracy for two years and were doing so under the supervision of… wait for it…. yep, Dana Boente.

Sidney Powell 🇺🇸⭐⭐⭐@SidneyPowell1

The government just provided the defense with remarkable new & long withheld BRADY evidence. Letter below just filed. Stay tuned.@realDonaldTrump @Techno_Fog @seanmdav @seanhannity @ProfMJCleveland @BarbaraRedgate @JosephJFlynn1 @lofly727 @GoJackFlynn

View image on Twitter
6,535 people are talking about this

Here’s the backstory on Dana Boente as a key player in the Spygate cover-up, as we presented the information over a year ago.  [NOTE: feeling confident that Boente was one of the key corrupt actors, I noted originally to bookmark that post]:

If you followed closely, and accept that Rosenstein was part of the problem, then you see how FBI Director Christopher Wray came into office; and, more importantly how/why Wray selected former DOJ-NSD head Dana Boente to shift from main justice to be legal counsel for the FBI.

Boente took over for former chief legal counsel James Baker, after the discoveries around Baker and McCabe could no longer be hidden. After being removed from responsibility eventually Baker resigned and went to work with the Lawfare group.  Boente’s job at FBI was/is to bury information, block congressional inquiry, and protect the crew. Boente, along with Christopher Wray, is still there.

In a Fox News interview on Sunday, June 23, 2019, Devin Nunes said “someone at the FBI” appears to have been “determined to hide” then-Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec’s notes from both the FISA court and Congress.  Our research identified that “someone” as Dana Boente and crew in 2018.

Throughout 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and through today, across both administrations, the corrupt group within the FBI in DC were/are protecting themselves.

The FBI redacted the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages. The FBI removed Page and Strzok texts and emails. The FBI hid texts and emails from Lisa Page to Andrew McCabe. The FBI kept documents from congress. The FBI has leaked false information to media to cover their tracks; and yes the Trump FBI and GOPe politicians have participated writ large, many still do.

The corrupt FBI under Comey, McCabe and Baker is being protected and facilitated by the corrupt FBI under Christopher Wray, David Bowditch (San Bernadino infamy) and Dana Boente. It’s one long continuum of exactly the same behavior.  Remember, 50 FBI ‘agents’ on Mueller’s team?  Etc….  This DC network is ideologically aligned, operating on their own self-interests, and facilitated by a compliant media.

In 2015 the DOJ-OIG (office of inspector general) requested oversight of the DOJ National Security Division. It was Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58 page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the DOJ-NSD.

The DOJ-NSD is where FISA warrants come from.  The weaponized and highly politicized officials within the DOJ-NSD were using the auspices of FARA violations (foreign agent registration act) to gain FISA court authorized surveillance on politicians all over Washington DC.  Combined with the NSA database extractions, by federal contractors authorized by the FBI, it’s a massive web of political surveillance.

When John Carlin resigned as Asst. Attorney General in charge of the DOJ National Security Division in October 2016 he was replaced by Principal Deputy Asst. Attorney General and Chief of Staff, Mary McCord. After President Trump took office on January 20th, 2017, Sally Yates was Acting AG and Mary McCord was in charge of the DOJ-NSD.

Yates and McCord were the two Main Justice officials who then engaged with White House Counsel Don McGahn on January 26th, 2017, regarding the General Flynn FBI interview conducted on January 24th. The Trump-Russia Collusion Conspiracy was the headline.

On January 30th, 2017, Sally Yates was fired for refusing to defend the Trump travel ban from extremist countries. Yates was replaced on January 31st by the U.S. Attorney from the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA), Dana Boente.

With his shift to Main Justice Dana Boente was Acting Attorney General, and Mary McCord was Asst. AG in charge of the DOJ-NSD. Boente was in the Acting AG position from Jan 31st, 2017, until Jeff Sessions was confirmed on February 8th, 2017.

When Jeff Sessions became AG, Dana Boente became Acting Deputy AG, a role he would retain until Rod Rosenstein was confirmed on April 25th, 2017. [Mary McCord remained head of the DOJ-National Security Division]

On March 2nd, 2017, Dana Boente was one of the small group who participated in a conversation that led to the recusal of Jeff Sessions from anything related to the 2016 election. This recusal included the ongoing FBI counterintelligence investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane, which was later picked up by Robert Mueller.

The other attendees for the recusal decision-making meeting (see above schedule) included Sessions’ chief of staff Jody Hunt; Criminal Chief in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland, Jim Crowell; Deputy Assistant Attorney General (DAAG) in the Department of Justice National Security Division Tash Gauhar (FISA lawyer); and Associate Deputy Attorney General Scott Schools. [Note: Tash Gauhar was lawyer for FBI Clinton case; and Scott Schools was part of drafting Clinton exoneration letter.]

The Main Justice group influenced Jeff Sessions to recuse.

With AG Jeff Sessions recused on March 2, 2017, FBI Director James Comey now reported to Acting Deputy AG Dana Boente. [Technically, Boente is still EDVA U.S. Attorney and is only ‘acting’ as Deputy AG] Additionally, on March 31st, 2017, President Trump signs executive order 13787 making the U.S. EDVA Attorney the 3rd in line for DOJ succession.

Question: If Dana Boente was appointed “Acting Attorney General” on January 31st, 2017 (he was), then why did Don McGahn need to draw up XO 13787 on March 31st, 2017… especially after confirmed AG Jeff Sessions was already in place Feb 9th?

The answer likely has to do with a sign-off needed for FISA.

See the issue?

How does somebody (unknown) advise White House Counsel Don McGahn to draw up an executive order so that Boente can sign a FISA…. without telling Don McGahn the reason why AG Sessions can’t sign off on the FISA?

See the issue now?

In the period between March 2nd and April 25th – With AG Sessions recused, and without a Deputy AG confirmed, Dana Boente is simultaneously:

  • U.S. Attorney for EDVA
  • Acting Deputy AG.
  • Acting AG for all issues related to Sessions recusal.

It is James Comey and Dana Boente who sign the April 2017 FISA renewal for Carter Page.

(Page #271 – Carter Page FISA Application)

This dynamic would later become important as notes Boente took from conversations with James Comey became evidence for Mueller’s expanded obstruction investigation. [3/2/17 Mary McCord is still head of DOJ-NSD]

Somehow Acting Deputy AG Dana Boente’s personal and handwritten notes were mysteriously leaked to MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

[Backstory Here]

On April 20th, 2017, Mary McCord announces her intent to resign from the DOJ National Security Division effective with the confirmation of Deputy AG nominee Rod Rosenstein.

On April 25th, 2017, Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein is confirmed. Rosenstein now takes over the responsibilities held by Acting DAG Dana Boente; this includes the FBI counterintelligence probe.

On May 9th, 2017, FBI Director James Comey is fired.

On May 10th, 2017, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe opens a criminal ‘obstruction of justice investigation’ of President Trump to parallel/compliment the ongoing counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign and administration.

On/Around May 11th, 2017, Mary McCord departs. Dana Boente now becomes the Asst. Attorney General and head of the DOJ National Security Divison. Simultaneously retaining role as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of VA.

On May 16th, 2017, Rosenstein takes Robert Mueller to the White House to meet President Trump. On May 17th, Rosenstein appoints the Robert Mueller special counsel probe. On May 18th, 2017, Scott Schools authorizes Robert Mueller:

And we’re off to the Trump-Russia-Collusion-Obstruction races…

With hindsight it is now clear the various players inside Main Justice and the FBI had a vested interest in maintaining the assault against Trump. By now everyone can see the bigger goal was against the office of POTUS. [“obstruction” etc.] All of the personnel moves should be reviewed with hindsight of the larger anti-Trump objective in mind.

Against the known fraud that was the Trump-Russia Collusion-Conspiracy narrative, there are no visible people who didn’t participate in one form or another.

Dana Boente was head of DOJ-NSD from May 11th, 2017 through end of October 2017 when he officially announced his intent to retire. However, the timeline gets cloudy here because Boente said he was staying on until an official replacement was announced. There’s no indication of when he actually left the DOJ-NSD or the EDVA role.

On January 23rd, 2018, FBI Director Christopher Wray announces Boente has shifted over to the FBI to be Chief Legal Counsel (replacing James Baker). As Mueller is using 19 lawyers, and 40 FBI investigators, Boente now becomes a legal adviser to Christopher Wray while the Mueller probe is ongoing.

As we recently discovered, Mueller’s lead FBI agent for the corrupt Russia collusion-conspiracy investigation, was David W. Archey. Archey was selected by Robert Mueller when FBI Agent Peter Strzok was removed. The Mueller probe took over the counterintelligence investigation in May 2017, a few months later Special Agent Peter Strzok was removed (July) and David W. Archey was brought in:

As David Archey arrives in August 2017, Mueller is getting the new scope memo from Rod Rosenstein. There’s little doubt the entire FBI group would have known the Trump-Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative was false. So Archey status as lead agent has to be considered *corrupt/sketchy*; FBI activity was likely focused on the obstruction angle.

Interestingly at the conclusion of the Mueller investigation Archey was promoted by Christopher Wray to head of the Richmond, Virginia FBI field office (March 4, 2019). This field office overlaps with another FBI/DOJ filing from the EDVA.

The April 11th, 2019, recently released Julian Assange indictment stems from the EDVA. From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:

(Link to pdf)

However, on Tuesday April 15th more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….

The investigation took place prior to December 2017, it is coming from the EDVA where Dana Boente was still, presumably, U.S. Attorney. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until April of 2019.

Why the delay? Here’s where it gets interesting….

This FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”

(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.

Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”

Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)

It would appear the FBI took keen interest after this August 2017 meeting and gathered specific evidence for a grand jury by December 2017. Then the DOJ sat on the indictment (sealed in March 2018) while the Mueller probe was ongoing; until April 11th, 2019, when a coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was launched. Assange was arrested, and the indictment was unsealed (link).

To me, as a person who has researched this three year fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, JAR report(needed for Obama in December ’16), and political ICA (January ’17); this looks like a Deep State move to control Julian Assange because the Mueller report is dependent on Russia cybercrimes…. AND that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story:

(Bloomberg) Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Friday that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report describes Russian cybercrimesduring the 2016 election.

The report, which is expected to be released soon, will clear up questions about the Russian campaign to interfere in the election President Donald Trump won, Rosenstein said in a speech given to a private group at the Metropolitan Club of Washington, according to three people in attendance. (more)

The Weissmann/Mueller/Rosenstein report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview. There’s the FBI motive to shut Assange down.

The DNC hack claim is contingent upon analysis by Crowdstrike computer forensics who were paid by the DNC to look into the issue. The FBI was never allowed to review the servers independently, and now we know the FBI never even looked at a full forensics report from Crowdstrike.  Almost all independent research into this DNC hack claim also challenges the claims of a Russia hack of the DNC servers.

Dana Boente was part of the group who advised Sessions to recuse. Boente later authorized the second renewal of the Title-one surveillance warrant and worked with James Comey. Boente then leaked his Comey notes to the media, essentially to support Comey’s narrative about Trump; and participated from within the FBI as legal counsel to Chris Wray who told everyone in July 2018 there was no political bias in the FBI… but hey, everyone is going to bias training….. and pay no attention to the 40 FBI agents who were investigating an invisible Trump Russia-Collusion-Conspiracy for two years.

Seriously?

There are no “good guys” in this. There are no “white hats” here. Certainly not Mueller, Rosenstein, Wray, Bowditch or Boente. Instead, this is a matrix of broad interests positioned only to benefit and sustain the status quo of the administrative state; and protect the larger community from the Trump disruption.

In the end it all comes back to the same series of questions. Who was recommending to President Trump that he retain and promote DOJ and FBI officials who were part of the anti-Trump Russia collusion-conspiracy program?

People who knew the DC system and were vulnerable to DC peer influence. People who would take counsel and advice on who was needed and where.  People in positions of influence with President Trump.  People who could intentionally, or unwittingly, steer these placements from a position of advisement close to the President.

Appointing Rod Rosenstein as DAG was one of those key placements.

Appointing DC U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu was another.

From Rosenstein we get: Mueller, Chris Wray, David Bowditch and Dana Boente.

Meanwhile Jessie Liu quashed cases against: Awan bros, James Wolfe, Greg Craig and Andrew McCabe.

The Russia Conspiracy Collusion is built on a foundation of purposeful lies.  The DC network within the FBI and DOJ are at risk if those lies are exposed.

One of the cornerstone lies is that the Russians hacked the DNC servers…. that entirely false claim was manufactured in the heart of the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment.   The central claim is based on a secret evaluation by political operatives, and pushed by an intelligence apparatus that needs the Russian Conspiracy to hide their schemes.

It’s all FUBAR !!

Bring it all down !!

Hospitals Are Empty & Going Broke As Normal Healthcare has been Suspended


The lockdown was justified under the theory that Hospitals did not have the capacity to take care of the millions of people who would be struck down by the rapid coronavirus. All of that justification to lock down the nation never materialized. The ramifications have now turned to a denial of healthcare for the regular population and now doctors and medical staff are facing being laid off because normal health services are shut down. I personally could not even see a dentist because they were told to shut down by the American Dental Association.

Ironically, now hospitals are in danger of going bankrupt. We were told that we had to flatten the curve because there were not enough bed spaces. Then they did the subtle switch and the lockdown was justified until COVID-19 was eradicated. The interesting thing is how many institutions are sending us various materials because mainstream media will not cover it when it goes against their position of maintaining this lockdown. They are endangering our lives cor political nonsense by refusing to report the truth.

Here is a letter from the Virginia Hospital & Healthcare Association to Governor Northam asking that these emergency orders preventing healthcare for normal people be suspended. Where the justification was to protect public health, this lockdown is now threatening public health and the leftist media refuses to report the truth.

DOWNLOAD LETTER: Letter-to-Governor-Northam-Regarding-EO-Extension-4.18.20

 

 

Is the Lockdown A Violation of the Constitution?


In Idaho, despite having a Republican Governor, the police have violated the human rights of a mother who took her too small children to a park and was arrested and handcuffed in from of her children in a playground. Sara Walton Brady, 40, of Meridian, Idaho, was arrested and handcuffed for allowing her children to play on climbing equipment at a town park.  The Meridian Police Department had to respond with a public statement to justify what they did claiming she “was noncompliant and refused to leave after being given many opportunities, so she was arrested on one count of misdemeanor trespassing.”

There is recognized power inherent in government to impose civil confinement for mental incapacity. In Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979) a mother filed a petition for her son’s indefinite commitment to a state mental hospital in accordance with Texas law. Her son had a long history of confinements for mental and emotional disorders. The jury found that appellant was mentally ill and that he required hospitalization, and the trial court ordered his commitment for an indefinite period. The state trial court had instructed the jury to determine whether, based on “clear, unequivocal and convincing evidence,” he was mentally ill and required hospitalization for his own welfare and protection or the protection of others. He appealed and contended that the trial court should have employed the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of proof. The Supreme Court reversed and held that simply a “clear and convincing” standard of proof was all that was required by the Fourteenth Amendment in a civil proceeding even to commit an individual involuntarily for an indefinite period to a state mental hospital. Pp. 441 U. S. 425-433.

However, this decision does not truly apply when you are locking-down the entire population for they have not been afforded any due process right whatsoever in any court regardless of the standard of proof. Therefore, we must look further to find if there is any authority under the Constitution regarding quarantine lockdown orders.

We have to look historically as to what has the United States Supreme Court upheld with respect to such exercises of the states’ general police powers to protect public health through quarantines and other measures. The Supreme Court in Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11, 25, 25 S.Ct. 358, 49 L.Ed. 643 (1905) upheld a Massachusetts law requiring vaccination against smallpox  Id. at 39, 25 S.Ct. 358. The Court held that such a measure, enacted to protect public health, will not be struck down unless it “has no real or substantial relation to [that goal], or is, beyond all question, a plain, palpable invasion of rights” secured by the Constitution. Id. at 31, 25 S.Ct. 358. To uphold that law, the Court analogized to the unquestioned power to quarantine even an outwardly healthy individual entering the United States:

An American citizen arriving at an American port on a vessel in which, during the voyage, there had been cases of yellow fever or Asiatic cholera, he, although apparently free from disease himself, may yet, in some circumstances, be held in quarantine against his will on board of such vessel or in a quarantine station, until it be ascertained by inspection, conducted with due diligence, that the danger of the spread of the disease among the community at large has disappeared.

Id. at 29, 25 S.Ct. 358. Courts facing similar public health issues have recognized that the authorities possess similarly broad discretion.

Similarly, the Supreme Court also upheld quarantine laws in Compagnie Francaise de Navigation a Vapeur v. La. State Bd. of Health, 186 U.S. 380, 387, 22 S.Ct. 811, 46 L.Ed. 1209 (1902)(“[T]he power of States to enact and enforce quarantine laws for the safety and the protection of the health of their inhabitants . . . is beyond question.”); Ogden v. Gibbons, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1, 203, 6 L.Ed. 23 (1824)(dicta that a state has the power “to provide for the health of its citizens” by quarantine laws). Nevertheless, this is still not clear authority to justify locking-down all of the population without any evidence that they are actually at risk.

Thus Reynolds v. McNichols, 488 F.2d 1378 (10th Cir.1973), relying in part on Jacobson, upheld an ordinance “authorizing limited detention in jail without bond for the purpose of examination and treatment for a venereal disease of one reasonably suspected of having a venereal disease” 592*592 as a valid exercise of the police power. Id. at 1383.

In U.S. ex rel. Siegel v. Shinnick, 219 F.Supp. 789 (E.D.N.Y.1963), the court permitted the quarantine of a woman who had arrived in the U.S. from Stockholm (deemed “a smallpox infected area”) without presenting a certificate of vaccination. Id. at 790-91. The court upheld an administrative order that she be quarantined for 14 days, the length of the smallpox incubation period. Id. It acknowledged that public health officials “deal in a terrible context [where] the consequences of mistaken indulgence can be irretrievably tragic.” A better-safe-than-sorry determination was therefore entitled to deference, absent a “reliable showing of error,” id. at 791:

Their conclusion, reached in obvious good faith, cannot be challenged on the ground that they had no evidence of the exposure . . . to the disease; they, simply, were not free and certainly not bound to ignore the facts that opportunity for exposure existed during four days in Stockholm, that no one on earth could know for fourteen days whether or not there had been exposure. . . .

Id.

Some courts have indeed struck down quarantine orders as well, however, when they were found to be arbitrary and unreasonable in relation to their goal of protecting the public health. In Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10 (C.C.D.Cal.1900), the court found that sealing off an entire section of San Francisco to prevent the spread of the bubonic plague was “unreasonable, unjust, and oppressive.” Id. at 26. Such an overbroad order, the court declared, was “not in harmony with the declared purpose” of preventing the spread of the disease. Id. at 23.

In another case, the court also found the order was beyond the power of government and was thus of similar concern in In re Smith, 101 Sickels 68, 76, 146 N.Y. 68, 40 N.E. 497 (1895). There, the New York Court of Appeals rejected the blanket quarantine of individuals who refused vaccination, when there was no reason to believe they had been infected or even exposed to that disease.

Building on the legal principles, it can be reasonably argued that the initial decision to quarantine the entire society or to even demand worldwide vaccination as Bill Gates has been demanding, is beyond the power of government. This clearly bears no real or substantial relation to the protection of public health, and it is obviously arbitrary and oppressive. At a minimum, a complete quarantine of society shutting down all commerce is arbitrary and oppressive. There is not even clear and convincing evidence that a woman simply taking her two young children to play on swings threatened with society or the lives of her children. In Idaho, there were 1,766 cases in total with only 51 Deaths. The total population of Idaho was 1.7 million in 2019. Locking down the entire state for such a tiny fraction of the population testing positive was a violation of her Civil Rights actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

France Demanding to Trace Everything People Do – 21st Century Tyranny


Apple has been fighting off governments who are trying to eliminate all privacy by demanding the company provide back doors to allegedly combat terrorism. Now France is demanding that Apple allow its forthcoming coronavirus contact-tracing app to operate in the background of all its iPhones without building in any privacy measures, as reported by BBC. This further demonstrates that government is doing exactly what Socrates has forecast for these last two final waves in the ECM — authoritarian regimes that will most likely eventually suspend democracy and thereby elections on the next contrived crisis. All of this for a virus that has killed 50% less than the annual flu.

This is the Sixth Wave from the beginning of capitalism. We are in store for the collapse of governmental structures. This is why they are becoming so aggressive and have used every possible excuse to remove all hard won human rights.

What Gates & WHO Have Done to Third World Countries is Criminal


The press will not report what this lockdown has done worldwide. Third world countries are primarily service-oriented. These people have no savings and no unemployment insurance. There are now massive free food operations in Thailand to help people who have lost their jobs and are on the brink of starvation. This is the real news that the elitist leftist press will not cover because it exposes the irresponsibility of both Bill Gates, his Foundation, and the WHO with no regard to the dangers they have inflicted upon the entire world.

Download and Send this letter to Everyone You Know!


DOWNLOAD: President Donald Trump Letter- April 21-rv

 

This is the first page of the letter …

 

Guterres Focuses Only on Supporting Green Jobs in the Midst of Pandemic Crisis



Does the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth also confer the same legal protection upon the coronavirus because it is part of “Mother Earth?”

Joseph A. Klein, CFP United Nations Columnist imageRe-posted from the Conservative Tree House By  —— Bio and ArchivesApril 23, 2020

“On this International Mother Earth Day,” United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres proclaimed, “all eyes are on the COVID-19 pandemic – the biggest test the world has faced since the Second World War.” He issued this proclamation under the banner “Climate Action” in an attempt to link the devastating health and economic crisis wrought by the coronavirus pandemic to the UN’s radical climate change agenda. “We must act decisively to protect our planet from both the coronavirus and the existential threat of climate disruption. The current crisis is an unprecedented wake-up call.”

The Secretary General is following Rahm Emanuel’s advice to “never allow a crisis go to waste.” He is in sync with Democratic Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), a leading champion of the Green New Deal. She tweeted recently that “it’s the right time for a worker-led, mass investment in green infrastructure to save our planet.” In an even more reckless remark, AOC said that when faced with the decision whether to go back to work after conditions are safe enough to reopen the country Americans should “just say no.”

The International Monetary Fund has predicted that the global lockdown will create an economic crisis not seen since the Great Depression. Job losses are already catastrophic, with far more job losses to come. With a combination of fiscal and monetary policies, governments are trying to rescue businesses that are willing to save the jobs of their workers. But as far as Secretary General Guterres is concerned, only “green jobs” are worth the expenditure of taxpayers’ money. He said that “as we spend huge amounts of money to recover from the coronavirus, we must deliver new jobs and businesses through a clean, green transition.”  He is pressing for an end to fossil fuel subsidies.

Mr. Guterres can afford to make such sweeping statements because, unlike President Trump and other government leaders, he is not accountable for the welfare of the millions of people in their countries at risk of losing their jobs today that are tied to fossil fuel energy. Fortunately, President Trump is not listening to the Secretary General.  “We will never let the great U.S. Oil & Gas Industry down,” President Trump said on Twitter. “I have instructed the Secretary of Energy and Secretary of the Treasury to formulate a plan which will make funds available so that these very important companies and jobs will be secured long into the future!”

The UN’s embrace of “Mother Earth” is yet another step in the direction of global governance of the environment that Canadian oil businessman-cum-radical environmentalist Maurice Strong initiated back in the 1990’s. Strong leveraged his contacts at the United Nations to organize the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development—the so-called “Earth Summit”—which took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. He went on from there to push for the adoption and implementation world-wide of a document that became known as Agenda 21 — an 800-page blueprint for ‘sustainable development’ in the 21st century.

Who knew that a bat has the same legal rights as a human being?

This in turn was followed by Strong’s work on the “Earth Charter,” which was approved at the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization headquarters in Paris in March 2000. One can think of the 2016 Paris Climate Agreement as the direct descendant of the Earth Charter. But globalists are looking far beyond the Paris agreement. They are busy concocting the idea that Mother Earth has its own inherent legal rights worthy of protections from the acts of human beings.

The website of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) declares: “Laws recognizing the Rights of Nature change the status of ecosystems and natural communities to being recognized as rights-bearing entities. As such, they have rights that can be enforced by people, governments, and communities on behalf of nature.” CELDF assisted in the drafting of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth, which was modeled on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. “Mother Earth is a living being,” it says. “Mother Earth and all beings are entitled to all the inherent rights recognized in this Declaration without distinction of any kind, such as may be made between organic and inorganic beings, species, origin, use to human beings, or any other status.”

Who knew that a bat has the same legal rights as a human being?  Does the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth also confer the same legal protection upon the coronavirus because it is part of “Mother Earth?” As preposterous as this sounds, the United Nations General Assembly listened to a presentation about the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth and passed resolutions calling for interactive dialogues on the role of “Earth jurisprudence” in conjunction with International Mother Earth Day. The UN Secretary General’s 2018 report on Harmony with Nature defined Earth jurisprudence as “a philosophy of law and human governance in which humans are only one part of a wider community of beings.”

The 2020 “Interactive dialogue on Harmony with Nature” was cancelled by the General Assembly because of the coronavirus pandemic. Earth jurisprudence was on the agenda. Maybe next year, the participants can discuss a lawsuit against the coronavirus itself since the UN’s World Health Organization believes that China, where the virus originated, did nothing wrong.

Calling People “Non-Essential” Latest Insult From Government


Calling Americans “non-essential,” is derogatory and uncalled for, akin to Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” comment and Obama’s disdain for those who “bitterly cling to their religion and guns.”

Daniel Wiseman  image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By —— Bio and ArchivesApril 23, 2020

Calling People Non-Essential Latest Insult From GovernmentBy labeling many private sector workers as “non-essential” during the COVID-19 crisis, government again needlessly insults regular Americans.

Affixing the word “non-essential” to a human being is anti-life elitism. The message: “We’re from the government and know better than you. We enlightened ones understand, but you the great unwashed do not.”

These mostly Democrat governors in their executive orders are stealing people’s dignity and the right to assemble and engage in commerce. In truth, nearly every business and government agency in the United States was designated “essential,” and allowed to operate. However, businesses involved in amusements and certain retail operations were declared “non-essential” and forced to close. That the overwhelming number of businesses were allowed to open despite the COVID-19 contagion risk creates a double-standard for those engaged in leisure activities. Classifying someone trying to make a living as “non-essential” represents a sick ideology and hurts people’s spiritual and mental well-being. Every worker is “essential” to somebody, particularly when it comes to supporting their families. There are now more than 20 million Americans who have lost their jobs in the last four weeks.

It’s totalitarian for the government to decide what is essential and who is not. The government belongs to We The People, and not the other way around. Ground Zero for “non-essential” workers, ironically, is the government itself. By definition, there ought to be no “non-essential” workers in government because taxpayers pay those salaries.

In our consumer culture, leisure activities and amusements are essential to those who find them essential. For example, as a former Pittsburgher, remove football and the Steelers from Pittsburgh and it’s not the same place. The Steelers are the singular unifying feature of life there. If you don’t think the Steelers are “essential” to Pittsburgh, you haven’t lived there.

Besides waging war, government rarely competes with the private sector in terms of quality. Private schools and hospitals uniformly function better than public ones. One trip to any state department of motor vehicles ought to disavow any sane person of wanting the federal government to take over health care in United States.

The massive shutdown of the economy to combat COVID-19 is now being used by the Left to “re-envision” the United States, particularly taking the opportunity to destroy capitalism and replace it with socialism. One person on Twitter posted that re-opening the country and free enterprise is a “death cult.”

It’s a small leap from being “non-essential” to becoming “obsolete.” How pernicious this thinking is can be found in random internet searches.

From a Wiki User in 2013, “Non-essential workers are those employees that require little or no training and are in positions that almost any able bodied person could fulfill.”

Also from Wiki User in 2014, “The U.S. government makes a distinction between essential and non-essential workers. The U.S. government cannot operate without essential workers like Congressmen and key- (office) holders. Non-essentialworkers are those that do nothing directly affecting the government’s operations.”

These are anti-American ideas and they cannot be allowed to triumph during the hysterical government response to COVID-19.
It has been a month since Governor Andrew Cuomo ruled who is non-essential in New York and ordered workers to work from home and to remain indoors as much as possible to slow the spread of COVID-19.

Here is who Cuomo declared essential employees, those working in:

  • Health care operations, including research and laboratory services.
  • Infrastructure, including utilities.
  • Telecommunications.
  • Airports and transportation.
  • Manufacturing of food and pharmaceuticals.
  • Grocery stores and pharmacies.
  • Trash collection.
  • Mail and shipping services.
  • News media.
  • Banks and related financial institutions.
  • Providers of basic necessities to economically disadvantaged populations.
  • Construction.
  • Vendors to services necessary to maintain safety.
  • Sanitation and essential operations in residences and most businesses.
  • Vendors that provide essential services or products in logistics and technology.
  • Child care and services needed to ensure the continuing operation of government.
  • Additional guidance posted by the state added services such as laundromats and animal-care clinics.

That’s nearly everybody, so why differentiate between essential and non-essential?

Which businesses did Cuomo declare non-essential? Those that people frequent for pleasure, like gyms, bars, restaurants, movie theaters, museums, sporting events and concert halls. The All-Powerful Cuomo said his rationale to close these businesses was that they are hubs of social interaction, making them a higher risk for spreading COVID-19 among the population.

In reality, these amusement businesses could have established their own safety guidelines in conjunction with reasonable government standards, which are in short supply. Amusements are essential to the American Way of Life, but we all like different things. Some like Broadway, some Hip Hop. Some baseball; some rodeo. Some read the Bible and want to go to church; others like drinking in a bar and having a good time.

Calling Americans “non-essential,” is derogatory and uncalled for, akin to Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” comment and Obama’s disdain for those who “bitterly cling to their religion and guns.” All hard-working Americans are essential; there is a word for the Left’s labeling people non-essential: heinous.

What’s Up Doc?!


Lady Gaga called the Doc a “superstar” during the One World concert designed to prop up the rotten borough that is WHO. Do entertainers, actors really have any conception about this guy Doc Tedros and his checkered history?

John Burtis image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesApril 23, 2020

Lady Gaga, and TedrosWhen I think of the vaunted World Health Organization, under the guidance of the onetime big tooth on the crushing cog of the cruel Marxist dictatorship which used to run Ethiopia, erstwhile kidnapper and that great and good healer, good old Doctor Tedros Adhanom-Ghebreyesus PhD, I am reminded of the old vaudeville act of Abbott and Costello and WHO’s on first, especially when their routine, like WHO’s and old Doc Tedros’s, follows the money:

Costello: WHO gets the money?…
Abbott: He does, every dollar. Sometimes his wife comes down and collects it.
Costello: WHO’s wife?
Abbott: Yes.

WHO has degenerated into a good time club of bureaucrats whose primary goal is jet-setting, lavish meals with top shelf booze and babes

Unlike the once great United Nations, where pitifully selfless individuals like Trygvie Lie and Dag Hammarskjold  once walked the storied halls of the UN, WHO has degenerated into a good time club of bureaucrats whose primary goal is jet-setting, lavish meals with top shelf booze and, according to wags in Stockholm and Kigali, babes.

WHO is no longer managed by the selfless sort of medical men like Arrowsmith and Gottlieb that are so richly described by Sinclair Lewis.  Nope, the UN health agency with global reach blows around $200 million a year on travel alone so its key grips and gaffers can fly business class and stay in five-star hotels — more than what it spends for battling some of the world’s biggest health crises like AIDS, according to the AP.  Meanwhile, with five times as many staffers, those pitiful lowlife chumps over at Doctors Without Borders, spend a bit over $40 million a year on travel, motels and yurts – the poor saps.

But let’s not overlook a few jots from the celebrated background of good old Doc Tedros Adhanom-Ghebreyesus PhD.

Before it came to power in 1991, in Ethiopia, through a violently destructive armed revolution, the TPLF was listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S. Homeland Security’s Global Terrorism Database.  Inside the Tigray People Liberation Front or TPLF, the major honchos could have been located in their nine-member gang–the executive committee.  This clique was ultimately responsible for all the corruption, killings, torture, mass detention, land grabs or the displacement of thousands as well as divying up the proceeds from their corrupt methods.  Good old Doc Adhanom was among the top three within that gang and on this committee and he was very close to the late dictator Meles Zenawi, who expired in 2012 from a sudden onset infection, which some said was from an overexposure to lead, the typical gangster’s death.

Once the right-hand man of Zenawi, whom Adhanom refers to as “the great leader”, he wasn’t an ordinary health minister (2005-2012) or a foreign minister (2012-2016). Doc Tedros had risen from a rank-and-file thug in the TPLF to its central and executive committees. TPLF, where membership is based on the twin virtues of ethnic origin and brutality, is responsible for countless killings, torture, mass detentions and violent repressions. The TPLF had instituted a discriminatory political and economic structure that enabled it to dominate and subjugate the majority in Ethiopia. Given this narrow-minded, ethnocentric experience combined with a taste for violence, his upcoming aspiration to lead WHO is a bit hard to swallow and pass.  Can killers be healers?

In 2014, following a meeting with Yemeni security forces, Adhanom and his delegation of cronies wanted Yemen to have dissidents that enter Yemen to seek asylum or use Sana’a International Airport as a transit route, kidnapped and handed back over to them, according to two credible former security operatives.

Andargachew Tsege, a British citizen of Ethiopian origin, was top on the list of dissidents that the delegation, of which good old Doc Tedros Adhanom PhD was leader, wanted them, in CIA parlance, “terminated with extreme prejudice.” Tsege, who was one of the key figures in the 2005 popular movement for change and democracy in Ethiopia, had already received two death sentences in absentia in 2009 and 2012 for preaching such idiocy in Ethiopia, the good old doc’s home.

How did China gain such influence over old Doc Tedros Adhanom-Ghebreyesus

A few days after being kidnapped in June 2014, Tsege was hauled in front of Ethiopian TV for the usual perp walk. Adhanom who appeared on VOA Amharic in July 2015 and told the nation that although Tsege’s kidnapping was definitely justified, the poor man was receiving all the comforts of home in captivity, with a laptop, a TV and good eats. While the latter was not the case, after pressure by the Brits and the, now get this, the UN, Tsege was released in 2018 with 575 other unfortunates who shared death row with him. The kidnappers have never been brought to justice, have they, good Doc Tedros Adhanom PhD?

Lately out on the hustings, “Tedros apparently turned a blind eye to what happened in Wuhan and the rest of China and, after meeting with Xi in January, has helped Red China to play down the severity, prevalence and scope of the COVID-19 outbreak,” University of Texas-San Antonio professor Henry Thayer and Citizens Power Initiatives for China vice president Lianchao Han wrote in a March 17 op-ed published in The Hill.  Meanwhile WHO is now peddling Red China’s claims to have reduced the number of new infections in Wuhan to zero (0). Really, WHO?

How did China gain such influence over old Doc Tedros Adhanom-Ghebreyesus and done so much getting him elected with their monetary and material gifts to Africa’s perpetual poor and mismanaged nations?  “In short, the total contributions of China versus the U.S. is $86 million versus $893 million,” David Maxwell, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), told Fox News. “The U.S. contributes nearly 10 times the amount China does.”  I’ll bet you that there must be other inducements and emoluments going around to pave the good Doc’s path to the top slot in WHO’s corporation.  Or did Doc Tedros pick up a few tips from his Whitey Bulger days in the Horn of Africa?

Lady Gaga has called the Doc a “superstar”

Just like those thousands in Ethiopia in the bad old days of the TPLF when the bad old good Doc Tedros was a running wild, a Chinese real estate mogul who criticized his government’s response has suddenly disappeared. The Red Chinese have also severely punished doctors with real MDs who tried to warn the public in the outbreak’s early stages and later kept the lid on information about the virus so it wouldn’t escape online.

Sure, Lady Gaga has called the Doc a “superstar” during her comments in the latest One World concert designed to prop up the rotten borough that is WHO.  But do entertainers and actors really have any conception about this guy Doc Tedros and his checkered history?  Of course they don’t.  More is the pity.

Abbott & Costello Who’s On First