Tag Archives: Corrupt Supreme Court

Oct 17 2024

Tucker Carlson and Mark Halprin Pretend 2024 is really 1998


Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance

In this interview Tucker Carlson talks with Mark Halprin, a well-connected journalist that Tucker Carlson cites as the epicenter of all political power and journalistic knowledge since the mid-1980’s. Accordingly, the magnanimous and enlightened Mark Halprin knows more about the institutions of electoral influence, political power structures, people and organizations of political influence than most journalists, so sayeth Carlson.  And so, their discussion follows along.

If you are nostalgic for the time before you saw the strings on the political marionettes, and/or you like to remind yourself how you viewed politics in the era long before elections were decided by ballots instead of voters, you will enjoy this satiating conversation of how things used to be.

Both Halprin and Carlson pretend things are just like they were, while they apply 1998 political insight to the 2024 election year, and -for some reason- people discuss it.

However, if you have stopped pretending and you understand that modern political outcomes are determined by ballot systems, local ballot printing, fraudulent voter rolls to give the illusion of attribution to the locally printed ballots, and tabulation centers that conduct the necessary scanning of unattributed ballots to a number needed to generate the outcome, then this food-filled discussion about political sides between Halprin and Carlson ends up leaving you somewhat hungry.

Here’s an example.  Within the interview Mark Halprin notes that Kamala Harris campaign has raised over a billion dollars, and that’s just the money from inside the campaign; there’s much more from “outside groups and interests.”  With jaw-agape Carlson curiously asks where that money came from?  Halprin replies, “I have no idea,” and they simply move along.

Yes, the conversation is about various subsets of voters, black men who don’t support Harris as much, and a multitude of other various popular narratives that surround the 2024 election as written in various media.  Let me cut to the proverbial chase, none of that stuff matters.

Yes, along the same approach expressed by the Halprin’s and Carlson’s of the world, Barack Obama might be calling out the “brothers” who do not intend to vote for Kamala Harris.  However, in the real world of 2024 a very non-pretending James Clyburn might just as well say, “yes they are, they just don’t know it.”  Why, because Clyburn controls the ballots of “the brothers”; their voting intent is irrelevant.

Thus, we highlight once again the distinction between voters and ballots that seems intentionally lost amid a constructed interview between the very enlightened Halprin and the curiously incurious Carlson.

What exactly is the value of the conversation when the subject matter surrounding it is as useful to the 2024 election as vinyl records to modern rap music.  You decide.

To answer the question about Kamala Harris’ extraordinary fundraising, let’s just revisit demonstrable history.

First, James Clyburn’s operation was constructed during the Obama era through the financing of something called the Pigford Settlement.  Yes, Pigford-I was the payment mechanism behind taxpayer funds being shifted from govt to the very specifically black community.  The Clyburn team, along with legal powerhouses like Morgan & Morgan, were part of the payment distribution architecture.

With the capital to start the mechanics of the AME ballot scanning operation now financed, along comes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, set up by Elizabeth Warren, to funnel fines and pressure payments from the USA banking and finance sector to a host of progressive networks, ie community organizing groups.

There you go.  That’s the ‘elevator speech’ answer behind the odd “I don’t know” retort of Mark Halprin.

What was the intent of this interview?  I have no idea.  However, what they discuss seems like a conversation that might have been pertinent to elections many cycles ago, but not now.

In the modern era facilitated by the rise of Teh One Lightbringer of all political truth, what many might remember as our promised “fundamental change,” voters are irrelevant to the outcome.

That said, there are very serious efforts underway to apply tactical civics in this new battleground.  In that contest based on reality we destroy local ballot printing operations, block the use of fraudulent voter rolls and find industrious ways to stop the secret scanning operations within the AME network of 17 county tabulation centers.

If tactical civics are successful, and we are about to discover that “if” answer, then the conversation that Halprin and Carlson are currently having might reapply in the next election.  However, until then, talking about what voters intend to happen while ignoring the irrelevance therein, seems to miss the proverbial point of where we are in the modern era of ‘ballot collection’ elections.

Chapters:
0:00 Become a Member at TuckerCarlson.com
1:23 The State of the Presidential Race
6:37 Does Kamala Harris Stand For Anything?
12:23 What Is Harris’s Relationship Like With Joe Biden?
14:34 Harris Can’t Answer This Simple Question
16:01 What Do Harris’s Donors Think?
17:26 Mark Halperin’s Reporting That Biden Would Give up the Nomination
28:45 The Worst Scandal in American Journalism
31:09 Was the Biden/Trump Debate a Setup?
40:17 Covering the Trump Campaign
51:54 How Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama Took Out Biden
1:02:19 Corporate Media’s Self-Destruction and the Future of News
1:10:43 Black Men Are Voting for Trump
1:16:32 Why Is Our Voting System So Complicated?
1:18:58 Who’s Winning the Swing States?
1:19:54 Who’s Winning Nevada?
1:21:40 Who’s Winning Arizona?
1:25:55 Who’s Winning Georgia?
1:27:36 Who’s Winning North Carolina?
1:28:54 Who’s Winning Wisconsin?
1:29:39 Who’s Winning Michigan?
1:30:32 Who’s Winning Pennsylvania?
1:34:00 Here Is What the Private Polls Are Saying
1:39:21 War and NATO
1:50:15 RFK Jr. Being Anti-Establishment
1:53:48 Who Is Running the Country Right Now?
1:55:11 Trump Derangement Syndrome Will Be the Biggest Mental Health Crisis in American History
1:58:49 What Happens If Trump Loses?

NARCISSISM: […] If Trump wins, Obama might be seen as the aberration in the history of American politics, rather than Trump and his nativist authoritarianism. Obama acolytes have spent the last eight years rationalizing Trump as the last gasp backlash to the Democrat and his presidency. (link)

Oct 16 2024

The Deep Very Dark State


Posted originally on Oct 16, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Ross Perot Exit

QUESTION: What do you think of this independent journalist _____ who claims Trump is not what people think and is pointing to people in his first cabinet?

FLA

wizard of oz BehindTheCurtain

ANSWER: Pure propaganda. I question what her motive is or if she is just ignorant of what is taking place in the Biden Administration. There is a serious lack of any inside knowledge of how things truly work behind the curtain. I strongly urge you to watch the new documentary of General Mike Flynn. Trump did not pick his own cabinet in 2016. The Deep State did and stuffed in people like John Bolton. Obama warned Trump not to give General Flynn a position because Obama was all about protecting the Deep State. Even Flynn states in his documentary that Trump was unaware of the dark corridors of Washington.

As I said before, I was part of the vetting process for people who wanted to be president. They would send me in to advise on how the world economy really worked. I was in Tokyo and asked to go to Texas on my way back to meet with Ross Perot that weekend when he suddenly withdrew, claiming nonsense over his daughter’s wedding.

Perot_Threats_drove_me_out

Perot later blamed Bush for threatening him. But Ross did not know how the Deep State really controlled the country. They took out JFK and RFK both because they were a threat to the intelligence community. Like Trump, Ross was an outsider, which would not be allowed. Ross pulled out of the race, and the TRUE reason was they threatened to indict him and shut down his industrial airport under claims that drugs were being flown into that facility. Perot Field Fort Worth Alliance Airport is about 14 miles north of Fort Worth, Texas. The airport is mainly focused on cargo operations. It provides no major commercial passenger airline service. It was the world’s first purely industrial airport. That was at stake.

Pittman Letter

I know I was flying back from Tokyo for an urgent meeting with Ross, but it was canceled because he was threatened by force his withdrawal. This is the same MO they did to Flynn and eventually to me. Mark Pitman of Bloomberg News had just written a story about our operations. I was NOT managing money for the Japanese but buying their portfolios. I met Mark at the Hyatt Hotel by Grand Central Station. He vowed we are mot going to allow them to do this to you. Bloomberg pulled him off my case and would not allow him to write anything. They handed to David Glovin, who always supported the government. Bloomberg followed the order of the Justice Department and was by no means reporting the facts.

People make up conspiracy theories based on clips they might read. Unless you have actually been behind the curtain – you do not have any idea of what is really running this country.

Blinken Anthony

A vote for Kamala is not for her. She will run nothing. The real president in the Biden Administration is Antony Bliken, just as Dick Cheney was the real President in Bush Jr.’s administration. And BTW, I was asked to be Chief Economic Adviser in that Administration and turned it down. So I know who even picks the cabinets.

Bush Cheney

I know for a fact that Bush Jr. did NOT pick Cheney – they picked Cheney. I was told that they needed qualified people to fill the cabinet because Bush Jr. was “stupid,” and you really do not see him out and about giving statements or speeches. This is not BS, nor is it speculation – I was there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oct 15 2024

Mike Davis: “There Must Be A Criminal Probe Opened On Day 1 Into Crossfire Hurricane”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 14, 2024 at 7:00 am EST

Oct 14 2024

10% of Massachusetts Residents on Welfare


Welfare

Posted originally on Oct 14, 2024 By Martin Armstrong |  

The welfare state has exploded under Biden-Harris. Democrat-run Massachusetts recently revealed that they added an astounding 672,483 people to its EBT card and welfare programs, a 34.6% increase in a 14-month period! These figures indicate that 10% of the entire state is currently on welfare.

State Senator Ryan Fattman is demanding an audit, believing this uptick in welfare recipients correlated with the $3.1 spending package for migrants that passed in December 2023. Yet, migrants are allegedly not qualified to receive EBT or food stamps. How else could such a large portion of the state’s population end up on welfare in such a short amount of time?

Massachusetts capital

The unemployment rate reached 3.7% in Massachusetts this August, up by 0.2% from the month prior, but 0.5% lower than the national average. Labor force participation remains at 66.3%, the highest for the state since June 2020. There is no reason that resident in Massachusetts should be experiencing poverty at such a significant rate compared to the rest of the US.

Government programs are ineffective because they are prone to greed. These agencies rarely pass audits during the off chance someone bothers to conduct one. All we hear is how the state and federal governments simply have ran out of money and aid, when in all reality, they have no idea where or why their funds are dwindling.

Oct 13 2024

Eric Teetsel Highlights How Funds Have Been Stripped From CBP By FEMA To Give To Illegals


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 12, 2024 at 7:30 am EST

Oct 10 2024

Is FEMA a Slush Fund?


Posted originally on Oct 10, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

FEMAlogo_31809c

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has warned that it has run out of funding at the beginning of America’s hurricane season. Last month, the agency testified before Congress that it still has $4 billion in its Disaster Relief Fund, then claimed that Hurricane Helene wiped through the budget. The agency has been begging Congress to approve additional funding, but a new report found that FEMA has at least $8.3 billion in unused funds.

“We are expecting another hurricane hitting. We do not have the funds. FEMA does not have the funds to make it through the season and what is imminent,” Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas announced on October 2. Joe Biden warned that the federal government has already provided the victims, 600 who are still missing, with all the aid he was willing to provide. Where has all the money gone?

“They stole the FEMA money, just like they stole it from a bank, so they could give it to their illegal immigrants that they want to have vote for them this season,” former President Donald Trump said. FEMA was indeed tasked with providing money to Customs and Border Protection back in 2022 to help communities overrun with illegal migrants. In fact, FEMA provided $640 million in grants to Customs and Border Protection in 2024 alone, and spent $364 on the migrant crisis in 2023. This is merely one of countless programs misusing federal funds on non-citizens.

Yet, Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General issued a report that reveals FEMA still has billions in unused aid. “As of October 2022, FEMA estimated that 847 disaster declarations with approximately $73 billion in unliquidated funds remained open,” the report noted.

Here from Govt to Help

The agency is simply corrupt. FEMA still has $4.5 billion in frozen unused funds from Hurricane Sandy that hit 12 years ago, yet the deadline for this project was extended into 2026. Officials continue to extend deadlines and freeze funds with no clear indication as to why. Jeremy Portnoy of OpenTheBooks, a nonpartisan watchdog of government spending, claims that “all the money is just sitting there.” He has stated that FEMA is freezing “unliquidated obligations” at a time when it could easily reappoint those funds for immediate disaster relief. A separate DHS report believes “the potential risk for fraud, waste, and abuse increases the longer a program remains open.”

The agency has allegedly run out of funds from its Disaster Relief Fund on nine occasions since 2001. We are seeing countless reports on the ground of FEMA selectively distributing supplies. Private contractors who secured lucrative government deals are earning big while the government actively prevents individual citizens from assisting in rescuing efforts and delivering aid. The media is now claiming that the GOP simply does not want to grant FEMA additional funding, but why should we provide this agency with additional funding that could potentially go missing or become wrapped up in red tape? FEMA is certainly not a philanthropist organization as it operate just as any other public government entity where budgets are forged and the people at the top are profiting on the backs of taxpayers.

Oct 9 2024

Natalie Winters RIPS Jon Stewart Over His Criticism Of Elon Musk’s Support For Trump


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 08, 2024 at 6:00 pm EST

Oct 9 2024

Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson Discuss Current Politics


Posted originally on the CTH on October 8, 2024 | Sundance

Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk sat down for a conversation about current political events. The almost two-hour discussion was carried live on Twitter and is available on the platform HERE. Also Embedded below:

(0:00) Elon Musk Is All in on Donald Trump
(6:35) Providing Starlink to Victims of Hurricane Helene
(9:22) If Trump Loses, This Is the Last Election
(21:49) The Epstein and Diddy Client List
(33:38) Vaccines
(35:49) The Movement to Decriminalize Crime
(50:22) Gavin Newsom
(53:11) Europe’s Declining Birthrate
(57:02) We Need Religion
(1:08:04) Why Is There So Much Anti-Human Messaging?
(1:19:33) AI and the Woke Mind Virus
(1:43:01) Musk’s Role in a Trump Administration

Oct 7 2024

Ep. 3467a – Port Worker Strike Averted,Did This Just Set Off A Chain Reaction,Trump Sent A Message


Posted originally on Rumble By X 22 Report on: Oct 05, 2024 at 12:00 pm EST

Oct 7 2024

Why I Do Not Trust Safety Deposit Boxes


Posted originally on Oct 7, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

safety deposit boxes

I have said numerous times that your personal belongings are at risk in safety deposit boxes. The Fourth Amendment was intended to protect Americans from illegal search and seizures, but as we have seen in recent years, the government does not respect the Constitution or our freedoms. Governments will become increasingly tyrannical as we move into 2032, and every government believes that their citizens are to blame for large deficits. If only we paid our fair share then our politicians could fund their endless spending.

The government makes the rules. The Constitution has become a rough guideline that they simply do not follow. There are countless examples of the US government raiding safety deposit boxes under the pretense of restoring law and order. In March 2021, the FBI held a full-scale raid on US Private Vaults, a storage facility located in Beverly Hills, California. The government claimed that they needed to raid safety deposit boxes and confiscate the contents since they were purchased through illegal money laundering.

FBI DOJ

Up to 1,400 safety deposit boxes were seized, containing $86 million in cash, not including gold, jewelry, coins, and other valuables. The government said that they planned to keep all stolen items until a group of victims filed a class-action lawsuit. US District Judge R. Gary Klausner initially deemed that the FBI was within the scope of the warrant when it confiscated belongings from citizens who had absolutely no ties to criminal activity. A three-judge appeals panel later found that the FBI abused its authority as the warrant only permitted the department to open boxes of individuals under investigation. It took many years for the victims to receive a portion of their belongings, but not everyone was made whole.

This is a worldwide issue and is not limited to the United States. In 2016, for example, UK-based HSBC came after safe deposit boxes in Hong Kong to assist the government in looking for cash from citizens. In 2015, when Greece was suffering from its decision to join the European Union, Deputy Minister of Finance, Olga Valavani, announced that safe deposit boxes were restricted. There are COUNTLESS examples of governments throughout the world confiscating assets and banks are forced to comply.

FBI Raid Boxes

The grey area that is allowing this seizure of assets is multidimensional. First there is the assumption it is the illegal proceeds from drugs. Second, there is the presumption it is money laundering and that is very broad for it can be drug money to hiding money from the government to avoid taxes, which they also call money laundering. Third, there is the ambiguous Internal Revenue Service regulation that basically states. “Consumers should never conceal cash from the United States government and not pay income tax on it.”  They could argue that cash in a safety deposit box is hidden from the government. They can also now argue that this is money laundering and that cash should be confiscated. It becomes your burden to prove them wrong.

We heard what happened when FDR signed Executive Order 6102 in April 1933, prohibiting US citizens from owning gold. Penalties for disobeying were up to $10,000 and/or 10 years imprisonment. That was mostly fixed through voluntary transfer as the population was regaining confidence in government. What happens when the government moves digital and wants cash off the grid? There are NO guarantees. The government has the ability to accuse anyone of committing a crime and use that as a means to seize assets. We have seen it happen time and time again with debanking practices.

So no, I do not recommend keeping everything in a safe deposit box. There is no precise law against storing metal or cash in a safe deposit box, but the law is malleable in the hands of any judge. A judge can seize the money or gold under the pretense of money laundering or use the same facility as someone accused of the offense.