James Clyburn Says Democrats Have Until August 19th to Remove and Replace Joe Biden Through an Open Convention


Posted originally on the CTH on July 12, 2024 

By now everyone knows the importance of James Clyburn in the 2024 election.  Through his network, Clyburn controls the ballot counters in roughly 15 different urban areas. James Clyburn said earlier today the Democrats have until August 19th to replace Joe Biden through the open convention process.

It does not seem coincidental that Clyburn would make this statement in combination with a letter sent by 24 professional democrats urging, imploring, Joe Biden to release his delegates and allow an open convention to determine the 2024 Democrat nominee.  WATCH (key moment at 02:56):

WASHINGTON DC – A group of two dozen former House Democrats has sent a letter to President Joe Biden calling for him to step aside to prevent a GOP takeover of Washington. Instead, they want him to allow for an “open convention” this summer to decide the 2024 ticket.

In their letter, the 24 Democrats — which include former House members and one former senator — make clear that they do not doubt Biden’s “extraordinary record.” But they warn that if the president stays on the ballot, it would mean the party not only loses the White House, but would decimate their ranks in Congress. (more)

We keep watching.

[SOURCE]

The ETHICS Act – End Insider Trading in Congress


Posted originally on Jul 12, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Lobbying.Votes_

Both Democrats and Republicans in the Senate can agree on one thing – Congress has been using classified information to illegally trade stocks. Our public servants have been bought out by lobbyists and they no longer work for the public. A bipartisan group is passing on a formal consideration to prevent members of Congress and members, their spouses and dependents, from buying and selling stocks under the ETHICS Act (Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks).

Congress should not be here to make a buck,” Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said at a press conference Wednesday on Capitol Hill. “There is no reason why members of Congress ought to be profiting off of the information that only they get.” The Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee will hear the proposed legislation on July 24, but this topic and consistently been blocked. “Would you like to vote in favor of losing millions in illegal trades?” We should not be allowing the very people abusing their office to vote on this matter.

The Ethics Act would give legislators 90 days to sell their investments beginning in March 2027. The president and vice president would also need to divest covered investments. Those in violation would lose either their monthly salary or a mere 10% of the value of each covered asset.

Lobbying Good Bad 01

The severity of insider trading in Congress came to a head after March 2020 when the pandemic began. These insiders offloaded millions in stocks as they knew in advance what was to come. Over 72 lawmakers in the House and Senate received money from Big Pharma before the 2020 US Presidential Election. Over 50 invested heavily in the pharmaceutical sector before COVID became public, as reported by Open Secrets. Forty-eight lawmakers purchased Pfizer stock ahead of the vaccine rollout. Then these same lawmakers had the ability to vote on legislation that would directly benefit their investments.

Pfizer donated to 228 lawmakers on Capitol Hill ahead of the 2020 elections to the tune of $14 million. The company wrote out 1,048 individual checks to candidates and effectively manipulated the direction of the COVID pandemic as these lawmakers then voted on restrictions and mandates that benefitted Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies. Republicans and Democrats are both guilty of abusing their powers.

RevolvingDoorLOBBYISTS

Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.) were some of the top recipients of donations from the pharmaceutical industry, both holding seats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Tillis and Coons penned a bill in 2019 to protect pharmaceutical patents. Stats News reported that few candidates funded by Big Pharma lost their re-election campaigns.

Pharmaceuticals are one of EVERY sector that American lawmakers have their hands in. Our public sector workers, whose salary is paid for by the taxpayers, made decisions that impacted the health of the nation simply to line their own pockets.

InsideTraderoftheYear.Pelosi.meme_

Those like Nancy Pelosi have made MILLIONS on insider trading. In one example, Paul Pelosi managed to save $600,000 by selling his stock a month before the microchip ban on Russia and China, which cost Nvidia $400,000,000. Another time, Paul earned $5,300,000 after exercising a call option to buy 4,000 Alphabet shares. Not so coincidentally, this occurred when the House Judiciary Committee cracked down on antitrust practices. Nancy claims her husband is merely an extraordinary trader, and she has no involvement in his obvious success. She was against legislation to curb insider trading until her seat was threatened in the 2022 midterms. The ETHICS Act would prevent members from curtailing already proposed restrictions by banning them from trading through spouses or dependents.

Senator Jeff Merkley, a Democrat from Oregon, proclaimed to his colleagues “if you want to serve in Congress don’t come here to serve your portfolio, come here to serve the people.” Congress is currently only required to disclose their trades. Everyone sees the unethical practice happening, but nothing has been done. “The fact that members of Congress do better than a generalized portfolio suggests that there’s privileged information that folks hear about — may not be inside information, maybe it’s early information, maybe it’s an insight that comes from working on a sector through your committee work or so on an so forth, But that is an issue,” Merkley said.

Merkley and others are concerned that Congress will protest the ban on members of their household, with the Senator saying “members of Congress get very twitchy and when you say your family will be covered too, they have concerns.” We must restore democracy by preventing our public servants from using us as pawns for profit. The abuse became so blatant after COVID that this is perhaps a measure that needs to be passed by executive order. Take note of those who oppose the ETHICS Act as they are clearly sold out politicians who should not serve as public servants.

Could the September Target Indicate Biden’s Death?


Posted originally on Jul 12, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Question Future

I cannot answer whether or not Joe Biden’s death will be the catalyst for the September 2024 panic cycle our computers have been forecasting for decades. The event in September will mark a global shift – perhaps and more likely a war. A few readers have written in to question whether this event could end up being the death of the Democratic nominee. After all, media outlets are in overdrive to push the Parkinson’s narrative, and one is led to believe that his condition is worsening by the day, given the sudden negative press. Even the most liberal of commentators are suddenly calling for Biden to step down, with new reports released each day detailing Biden’s declining mind.

The sympathy would certainly shift to the left in the event of the death of our nation’s president. Kamala Harris would take over for Joe Biden as the President of the United States. The Democrats do not want Kamala as their frontrunner or the face of the nation. Biden’s health is a valid concern given his current state.

According to law, the sitting president would need to pass before June of the next November election for states to postpone primaries and allow a new candidate to enter the race. However, if a candidate dies between now and the primaries, that candidate’s party could put forth a new presidential candidate. Yet, if the candidate is deemed unfit to run for office they could also shift their elect before the primaries. Could Biden replace his VP pick and then fall terminally ill? Absolutely. Kamala could be awarded a role such as Secretary of State or used as a scapegoat and they could replace her with someone like Hillary Clinton.

Joe Biden’s team is not willing to relinquish power just yet, but rest assured the Democrats want him out of the office before the election to prevent a Kamala presidency under the 25th Amendment, factoring in if the Democrats could even secure the election.

This happened in 1972 when George McGovern’s running mate, Senator Tom Eagleton, was forced to pull out of the race. Sargent Shriver was then selected by McGovern to replace Eagleton but had to receive the full support of the Democratic National Committee first. So, the party can bypass state, constitutional, and federal law to install their nominee. The Republicans and Democrats have different rules for doing so.

It is impossible to determine the catalyst event for specific Turning Points or dates that the computer cites. I’ve been proven wrong countless times when attempting to forecast based on my own personal opinion rather than the clear-cut method provided by the models. Could Joe Biden pass away near the September target? Perhaps.

Personally, I believe we are looking at something more along the lines of escalating warfare come September. The Democratic primaries ended on June 8 of this year. The Democrats have until August 19-22 to determine their formal nominee. Joe Biden won as a write-in candidate with no opposition. Joe Biden does not need to die for the Democrats to hand the nomination to another. The Biden camp is willing to admit he is unfit to run, still, that does not mean his party wouldn’t turn against him and force him to exit.

Milwaukee Radio Station Admits They Edited Audio of Joe Biden Interview at the Request of White House


Posted originally on the CTH on July 11, 2024 | Sundance 

This latest admission adds fuel to a few fires.  #1 That Biden is having major cognitive issues; and #2 That the actual Hur tapes of the Biden deposition are unlikely to match the transcripts given to the House.

Civic Media, a Wisconsin-based left-sing talk-radio station, admitted earlier today [Press Release Here] they agreed to make edits to an interview with President Joe Biden at the request of the White House before the broadcast aired. The radio station now says it was a decision that fell short of “journalistic interview standards.”

PRESS RELEASE – The Earl Ingram Show was one of two radio programs contacted by the Biden campaign following the June 27th debate to speak with President Biden. The interview was recorded on July 3rd and aired on July 4th on Civic Media radio stations across Wisconsin. On Monday, July 8th, it was reported to Civic Media management that immediately after the phone interview was recorded, the Biden campaign called and asked for two edits to the recording before it aired. Civic Media management immediately undertook an investigation and determined that the production team at the time viewed the edits as non-substantive and broadcast and published the interview with two short segments removed.

In the interest of transparency, and consistent with Civic Media’s mission and core values, we are sharing the edited segments now, and making the full, unedited interview available. Given the gravity of the current political moment, the stakes in this election, and the importance of public scrutiny of public officials in the highest office, we believe it is important to share this information.

The two edits were:

1. At time 5:20, the removal of “…and in addition to that, I have more Blacks in my administration than any other president, all other presidents combined, and in major positions, cabinet positions.”

2. At time 14:15, in reference to Donald Trump’s call for the death penalty for the Central Park Five, the removal of “I don’t know if they even call for their hanging or not, but he–but they said […] convicted of murder.”

With a high-profile interview comes a listener expectation that journalistic interview standards will be applied, even for non-news programming. We did not meet those expectations. (LINK)

.

Too Funny – Joe Biden Introduces Volodymyr Zelensky as “President Putin”


Posted originally on the CTH on July 11, 2024 | Sundance

Oh, this is just too funny.  You cannot make this stuff up. During his NATO press remarks where the eyes are upon Joe Biden’s cognitive incapacity, he introduces Volodymyr Zelensky as “President Putin”.  WATCH:

.

I really need you guys to stop putting pins in the Joe Biden voodoo dolls.  This is getting to be a bit too funny.

Joe Biden “Big Boy” Press Conference – 6:30pm Livestream and Discussion Thread


Posted originally on the CTH on July 11, 2024 | Sundance 

Joe Biden will be holding what the White House calls his first, “big boy press conference” in eight months.  The professionally Democrat people in DC are holding their collective breaths, with the majority hoping Biden withdraws from the race.

Without doubt the U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is going to be watching this press conference closely to judge their next steps in his removal.  Apparently, the group of trusted staff and advisors has now shrunk to less than a handful, as the media have seemingly abandoned all efforts to remain in the world of pretending.  As ABC notes, “President Biden, facing a political crisis as Democrats question the viability of his campaign and mental fitness, will be put to the test on Thursday when he holds his first solo news conference of the year.”

The “Big Boy” presser is scheduled for 6:30pm Eastern Time.  Anything is possible.  Livestream links are below. If you are tuned in to watch the press conference, consider this an open discussion thread.

.

If he survives the media will applaud, and the IC will plot.

I might encourage readers/viewers to revisit this CTH article from April 2023

.

Democrats are Putin


Posted originally on the CTH on July 11, 2024 | Sundance 

If we accept the actions and outcomes that are visible from Democrats right now, their definition of “democracy” is apparently to dismiss the will of tens-of-millions of Democrat party voters, and instead install a candidate the DC insiders select.

Democrats and even Biden administration officials are being very open about their intent. They are dismissing Joe Biden and debating the installation of their chosen alternative; all while trying to jail their political opponent.

Can democrats see their version of “democracy” is identical to horrible Vladimir Putin?

I can only imagine the conversation atop various government offices around the world as they watch this all unfold.

Additionally, having just returned from an extended visit to Russia, where I literally spent exhaustive time researching how the government views their role within the social compact – and its consequence upon the average population, the “we know better” outlook currently on display by Democrat influence operations in DC is stunningly similar.

Democrats are defending “The Motherland,” where “mother” is their retention of omnipotent power. Yes, Democrats are Putin.

(VIA CNN) – […] there have been clear signs throughout his term of Biden being increasingly stage-managed, with lists of talking points, names of questioners and drawings of where he should walk presented to him by aides. Ahead of closed-door Cabinet meetings that Biden attends, it is customary for Cabinet officials to submit questions and key talking points that they plan to present in front of Biden ahead of time to White House aides, two sources with direct knowledge told CNN.

“The entire display is kind of an act,” one of those sources told CNN. “They would come and say, ‘Hey, the president is going to call on you about 25 minutes in, and ask this question. What are the bullet points you’ll respond with?’”

[…] In fact, the last full Cabinet meeting took place on October 2, 2023. Sources also said Cabinet meetings during the Obama years, which Biden attended as vice president, were not pre-scripted this way.

[…] “There’s this general sense of just, unbelievable holding your breath every time he does an event, every time he’s with people,” one top Democrat in close touch with Biden’s inner circle of advisers told CNN. This person added that some of those advisers have privately acknowledged: “This is going to get worse.”

That Democrat was blunt about how the president’s closest advisers have responded to any criticism or concerns expressed about the president – including his age and fitness: “Everyone who expresses any level of suspicion or contrary views? They call everyone and they beat the s*** out of them and say: ‘Stay on message.’”

At least one official involved in Biden’s debate prep at Camp David raised doubts about his ability after seeing how rehearsals were going, according to one source briefed on those preparations.

“It’s not like Biden’s inner circle didn’t know this,” one Democratic strategist close to the White House said of the extent of the president’s recent decline.

Campaign officials have rejected Clooney’s and other donors’ characterization of Biden at the Los Angeles fundraiser, with one senior Biden official who was in attendance telling CNN that while the president had in fact been tired that day, he was “animated and extremely present.” (read more)

“I find it both laughable and preposterous that the same people who, for the past four years, forced you to carry a vaccine passport to dine in a restaurant, hold a job or get on a flight are the same people now opposing common-sense legislation requiring individuals to show proof of American citizenship to vote in elections.” – Rep Paul Gosar

Hey Joe, The Call is Coming from Inside the Building


Posted originally on the CTH on July 11, 2024 | Sundance

As things in Washington DC unfold, it is easy to lose sight of the forest due to the trees.  A few obvious big picture items:

♦ First, why is Volodymyr Zelenskyy attending a NATO summit?  Ukraine is not a part of NATO.

♦ Second, do not overlook the big picture.

While a NATO summit is happening in DC, Joe Biden is under the most intense political attack in his tenure, from his own administration.  This does not happen without the approval of the deepest elements within the Deep State apparatus, the Intelligence Community.

There is no way the entirety of the system, which in this case is specifically the U.S. State Department and Intelligence Community, would normally be launching a full-frontal assault on the office of the presidency while international leaders are here.

This just isn’t done and represents a historic inflection point.  So, we must ask what’s the background, motive and intent?

The obvious answer is that removing Joe Biden is seen as the best option for the DoS/IC.  This perspective highlights the non-pretending reality that these institutions regard the November election as lost if Joe Biden remains their candidate.

The IC and Dept of State cannot have Donald Trump take control of their operation, especially since the recent Supreme Court ruling that affirmed a majority opinion using strong language consistent with the Unitary Executive theory of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court said, the President is “a person alone who comprises a branch of government.”  [pdf, page 38] In essence, the president *IS* the Executive Branch, and all of the other various bureaucratic agents and agencies within it are under his unilateral “official act” control.

From my perspective, research and years of being in/around the silos which make up the intelligence apparatus, this Supreme Court ruling is THE MOTIVE behind their urgency to get rid of Joe Biden; not, I repeat NOT, the underlying dementia and cognitive incapacity of their president.

The IC doesn’t fear Biden’s mental health issue except for the fact that it now puts a stronger likelihood on President Trump taking back the office of the presidency.  That office was just declared officially recognized by SCOTUS with the power and authority to deconstruct the IC.  That’s the bigger issue, not Biden per se’.

To the extent that Joe Biden will lose the November election, in combination with the Supreme Court ruling, that confluence became the five-alarm fire that triggered the intense urgency of the IC to take immediate and aggressive action with extreme prejudice.

Watching every silo within those agencies now come out in support of Biden’s removal, which we see in the attacks during the NATO summit, while simultaneously the pretending politicians in the legislative branch are shouting “our democracy,” is a level of something well beyond hypocrisy.

Millions of Democrat voters have spoken, Biden is their candidate. However, when faced with their own demise, the apparatus of the government he represents now says, ‘WHOAH, WAIT A MINUTE, this is not okay for us.’  Now, this “our democracy” mask drops very publicly and the elements within the deepest part of the very dark Deep State say “no,” and reveal their true face.

[Source, pdf – page 38]

The 6-3 opinion held that the President is “a person alone who comprises a branch of government.”  This is important to understand. The Executive Branch is the President.

As noted by reader Alex1689: […] Read the SCOTUS opinion, not from a point of view of apprehension about President Trump (he’ll be fine), but from the point of view of what does this allow him to do in his second term, and what straightjackets does it remove that were a threat during his first term?

To start, the court wrote about powers that carry with them core, absolute immunity, the exercise of which cannot come under question in any forum. It specifically identified:

Pardons

Recognition of foreign governments

Removal of executive branch officials.

If it can’t be questioned . . . It also cannot be the grounds for impeachment, can it?

Let’s repeat: If it’s a core power, the exercise of the core power cannot be grounds for impeachment (*except if done in connection with taking a bribe).

In his first term, there was the threat that if President Trump fired . . .

Rosenstein
Barr
Fauci

That he would be prosecuted for obstruction of justice or impeached.

That threat is forever off the table now.

He can fire anyone he likes in the executive branch. The straightjacket is gone.

On that point, further, the majority opinion uses strong language consistent with the Unitary Executive theory of the Constitution. The President is “a person alone who comprises a branch of government.”

While there are areas of shared constitutional responsibility, the core powers of the Executive Branch, including personnel, are the President’s alone.

Schedule F

Boom.

While impeachment is a political process within the Legislative Branch, and the Supreme Court is extremely hesitant to overstep their role therein, the High Court did put this sentiment clearly into the opinion about immunity: …“The President is not above the law. But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution.”…

Congress may not criminalize the conduct of the President simply for carrying out his core executive branch duties.

Removal of Executive Branch officials is a core duty, an official act, carrying absolute immunity.

That newly affirmed reality is exactly why the Intelligence Community and the Lawfare crowd are very alarmed.

Then think about the scale of how everyone has jumped into action to cover up everything that happened during the tenure of Barack Obama and the targeting of Donald Trump.  Think about the DOJ and FBI conduct, the Intelligence Community effort, the CIA, the DNI, everything that everyone did -in both political parties- in order to bury the reality of what took place using “their democracy.”

And now, the Supreme Court says that Godzilla Trump has full power of the executive branch, and the strongest likelihood is that Godzilla is going to arrive in November.

The DC Deep State is attacking Joe Biden during his NATO summit, and that summit is being held in Washington DC.

Put all of that together and you reach one fully contextualized scale of conclusion,

Joe’s gotta go!

Support CTH Here ~

Understand Schedule-F Here

Wolf: Steve Bannon Imprisonment Parallels To The First 6 Months Of 1933 Germany


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: July 10, 2024 at 06:15 pm EST

Paoletta: The Left Is Still Furious With SCOTUS And Resorting To Unprecedented Attacks


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: July 10, 2024 at 06:30 pm EST