Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By Judi McLeod —— Bio and Archives—August 28, 2020

Beware all worried citizens in Democrat-controlled Blue Cities, pillaged by Black Lives Matter and Antifa anarchists: “They’re not going to stop”.

That is the pre-election promise of Senator Kamala Harris, the new Hillary Clinton, with whom defiant Democrats plan to replace Joe Biden, if elected—but only when they have to admit that Biden’s failing health prevents him from serving as president.

The harum-scarum of the street mobs won’t stop “because this is a movement”, according to Harum-Scarum Harris.

Citizens whose small businesses will be burned down will be frightened out their wits by Harum-Scarum ways.

Senator Kama Harris is not just the voice of Democrat wind-up doll, cognitive-challenged Joe Biden, worse, she’s the coming voice of Black Lives Matter—INSIDE the White House.

“They’re not going to stop,” she said of the protests. “This is a movement.” (Hollywood Reporter, June 18, 2020)

“They’re not going to stop before Election Day in November, and they’re not going to stop after Election Day,” Harris continued.

“Everyone should take note of that on both levels, that they’re not going to let up and they should not and we should not.”

“Harris said that the protests must continue in order to make a difference and shared that she made a “conscious decision” to become a prosecutor because she doesn’t know one Black man that has never been racially profiled.

“The only way we’re going to truly achieve change is when there are people in the system who are willing or pushing to do it, and when there are those folks who are outside of the system demanding it,” she said.”

Shockingly, Harris openly admits that it is the destructive street mob movements getting the Democrats where they need to be:

“Some of the success that we’ve been able to achieve around criminal justice reform would not have happened in recent years were it not for Black Lives Matter,” Harris added. “These movements provide a counterforce to get us to where we need to be.” (Hollywood Reporter)

The legend in her own mind thinking she spins is that she became a protester while still a baby in a stroller:

“The first protest I ever attended was in a stroller when my parents were marching in the ‘60s,” she said. “It’s kind of something I’ve done my entire life.” (Hollywood Reporter)

“Noting that her parents were politically active, Harris said that she learned that the greatest movements in the country “have been born out of protests” and “understanding the power of the people to take to the streets and force their government to address what is wrong, the inequities, the inequalities, the unfairness.”

“Almost every one of those marches has been about one fundamental ideal in our country, which is equal justice under law,” she said. “And fighting to make sure that we have a government and a country that, at least every few steps, gets closer to achieving that ideal.” While the United States has not yet reached equality for all, Harris said that protests “are the catalyst to getting there.”

“The senator added that attending recent protests in Washington, D.C., gave her hope, saying that she saw “people who seemingly have nothing in common, who know they have everything in common, people of every race, age, gender together and seeing the commonality.”

“Harris also spoke about her relationship with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden in another segment.

“When asked if she would consider becoming his vice president, Harris, who’s been widely reported to be on Biden’s shortlist for the role, said that she’s “honored to be part of the conversation” and will do “everything in my power” to help Biden win the election.

“Despite her recent support, Harris had previously criticized Biden during the Democratic debates.

“It was a debate,” she said of her harsh words to Biden while she was still in the running to become the Democratic nominee. “Literally it was a debate. It was called a debate. Everyone traveled to the debate. There were journalists covering the debate where there would be a debate of differences of opinions and issues.”

“I am 1,000 percent supportive of Joe Biden and I will, again, do everything I can do make sure he is elected,” Harris added.

“I’ve known Joe a long time and I care about him deeply,” she continued. “As you know, we all have family members or friends with whom we have disagreements. That doesn’t overcome or overshadow the commonality between us and the connections between us.”

Claiming activism since her days in a baby stroller, Harum-Scarum Harris must have known when she celebrated having to get out of the Democrat primaries with only 2 percent popularity among what some called “the busload of crazies”, that she would be pegged as Sleepy Joe’s running mate back on December 3, 2019.

American citizens now know, one and all, that Kamala Harris Harum-Scarum days won’t be gone until she is.

Meanwhile, she’s not kidding about being the Black Lives Matter White House Insider if elected.

The proof is in the evil of her smile in video below:

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By Douglas V. Gibbs —— Bio and Archives—August 27, 2020

During the Republican National Convention the internet exploded with accusations and articles regarding the Hatch Act.  Well known liberal left websites like The Huffington Post, and media outlets like the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and New York Times, jumped on the bandwagon.  The Party of hatred and false accusations was at it again.  The Democrats, however, this time figured they had something on the GOP that could finally stick.

Except, it doesn’t.

The Huffington Post warned, “President Donald Trump’s insistence on using the White House for much of his nominating convention may be pressuring hundreds of staff into violating a federal law prohibiting political activity on government property, ethics experts said. While the president and vice president are exempt from the Hatch Act, employees who work at the White House ― both political appointees and civil servants ― are not exempt, meaning any federal employee who helped stage the various video productions at the Republican National Convention this week or the speeches by Trump and first lady Melania Trump could be exposed to the law’s penalties, which can range from a reprimand to being fired.”

The Los Angeles Times scolded, “Inevitably, White House staffers will have to be involved in the logistics for setting up and delivering the speech, as they were in all likelihood for Melania Trump’s speech on Tuesday and for the videos from the White House that have played at the convention.  Even if the employees voluntarily choose to work on such things, it would still violate the Hatch Act. Federal employees are flatly barred from participating in political activities. And pressuring them to do so is a criminal violation under the law.”

Not so fast.

An article by David Asp for Middle Tennessee State University explains, “The Hatch Act, an attempt to regulate corruption and possible intimidation of federal employees in the civil service by their elected supervisors, was enacted by Congress in 1939. The act banned the use of federal funds for electoral purposes and forbade federal officials from coercing political support with the promise of public jobs or funds. Sen. Carl Hatch, D-N.M., introduced the act after learning that New Deal–era government programs, specifically the Works Progress Administration, were using federal funds overtly to support Democratic Party candidates in the 1938 elections.”

The goal was to ensure the Hatch Act remained true to its original intent without necessarily quelling the First Amendment Rights of federal employees.

If you read the law in its current form, including all of the amendments, you learn that The Hatch Act applies to “federal civilian executive branch employees,” with rare exceptions, as well as to some state, Washington, D.C., and local government employees whose work involves federally funded programs (remember, the 1940 amendment).

The goal based on the current law is to ensure federal programs “are administered in a nonpartisan fashion, to protect federal employees from political coercion in the workplace, and to ensure that federal employees are advanced based on merit and not based on political affiliation.”

The federal employees in question are then divided into “less restricted” and “further restricted” categories.  The less restricted the employees, the more leeway they have when it comes to “taking part in partisan political management or partisan political campaigns.”  If they do so, however, they are not supposed to use their titles or positions “while engaged in political activity,” pressure workers to take part in campaigns or use politics to interfere in business pending “before their employing office.”

The employees with heavier restrictions tend to be those working in intelligence or enforcement agencies such as the FBI or Federal Election Commission. They are not allowed to engage in partisan political management or political campaigns.

To the staff, the event at the White House was like any other event.  They were not engaged in political activity, they were simply doing their job.  They were not promoting their political agenda in a corrupt manner, nor were they being forced to promote a political agenda through political activity.  They were simply doing their job of setting up chairs, editing film, or whatever.

As for the accusation regarding Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivering a video from his federally paid for trip to Israel?  He took a moment of his own free time to make the video, and presented himself as a citizen, family man, and American rather than Secretary of State.  The funds to get him to Israel were not for the purpose of the video, therefore federal funds were not misappropriated.

Could some of the Republican National Convention, considering that much of it was at the White House, if you are a nit-picker, be riding the line between violation and non-violation?  I suppose if you really wanted to pick it apart, you could say that.  But based on original intent of the law, and the evolution of the law through amendments, the reality is that no, the Republican Party did not violate the Hatch Act.

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh —— Bio and Archives—August 26, 2020

“Socialism is a system in which, as a matter of principle, the economic affairs of society belong to the public and not to the private sphere.” – Joseph Schumpeter, economist

Whether we have global green religion or a socialist one world government, or a communist global governance, the end result will be the same—the foundation that guides globalists will be vastly different from the foundation that guides America, the U.S. Constitution.

The Declaration of Independence states that “… All men are created equal … endowed by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights … to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness …”

Globalists think differently, freedoms and rights are granted by politicians

But globalists think differently, freedoms and rights are granted by politicians.  The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 2, states that “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration.”

According to the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution we have freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. At least we did until the all-powerful tech giants decided to censor conservatives on all their social media platforms.

Globalists, on the other hand, wrote in the U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Right, Article 19, “Freedom of expression may be restricted as approved by law.”

Our Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.” Eminent domain abuses such powers under the guise of development for the public good. Private property is indispensable to a free market capitalist economy.

Globalists see private property as the source of evil and must be prohibited. The U.N. Conference on Human Settlements of 1976 states that “Private ownership of land contributes to social injustice; public control of land use is indispensable.” Land use and property rights are also addressed in U.N. Agenda 21/2030.

Communist dictators from socialist countries have confiscated their citizens’ private property in order to make everything equal, equally miserable and poor. They nationalized factories, confiscated land, wealth, and homes. They vilified people who owned property as the “bourgeoisie,” fomenting hatred among those who did not own property.

Mao, Castro, Ceausescu, Stalin, and other socialist/communist dictators destroyed the middle class because it owned property – land and real estate. In some countries farmers and urban property owners were executed to frighten the rest into submission, and others were sentenced to hard labor in gulags, building roads and railroads, and excavating ore in mines in order to pay for their sins of bourgeois ownership.

For the longest time, the American government “derived its power from the consent of the governed.” Lately huge changes have taken place and the government bureaucracy at all levels, local, state, and federal, along with Congress have taken dictatorial powers without the consent of the governed under the guise of doing what is good for the “collective.”

Collective, of course, is a communist code word for we tell you what to do and you obey. That is exactly what global governance believes, that “the governed derive their freedoms from the consent of the government.

To prove the veracity of such a statement, watch what the local, state, and federal government are forcing us to do, locking down healthy people, forcing healthy citizens to wear face masks indefinitely, throwing them in jail for non-compliance, fining them, refusing them entry to grocery stores, malls, and medical clinics, and destroying small business and the economy for a minute percentage of casualties from a virus deemed a “pandemic,” forbidding doctors to prescribe potentially healing drugs that have been in use for 65 years, and pharmacists to dispense them under the threat of losing their medical and pharma license, firing doctors who actually cured many patients with drugs the government disapprove of, while censoring scientific data because it does not agree with the government narrative. This has never before happened in America on such a huge scale.

As Henry Lamb said in 2010, “In developed nations, the war against freedom means removing from individuals the freedom to do and say whatever they wish in the pursuit of their own happiness, and the freedom to choose the people who have the authority to make laws.  This war is waged with the counterfeit threat of cataclysmic global warming which requires global coordinated action. It is waged with trade agreements, treaties, and propaganda. It is wage with guilt-laden finger-pointing at America’s prosperity as the reason the rest of the world is in poverty.”

The war against our freedom is waged by the United Nations

The war against our freedom is waged by the United Nations, its myriad of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and global communists with large endowments and billions to burn for their cause, paying and using useful idiots within each country to create havoc and betray their own history and Constitution under the guise of fighting fascism and desiring to install socialism.

And they claim, they don’t want the socialism that has failed in all of the countries where it has been tried for decades and resulted in utter rejection by their citizens who lived in abject poverty and subjugation, after millions have lost their lives.

As Dinesh D’Souza points out in his recent book, these wannabe socialists promise everything on Earth on the condition that “… you are expected to give up your ownership of yourself, including your right to keep what is yours, your personal autonomy and dignity and your independence of mind.” This is just another “lust for power,” in which “socialism is the ideology of thieves and tyrants.” (United States of Socialism, Dinesh D’Souza, pp. 9-11)

D’Souza proposes that the American socialists, who added identity politics (Latino, black, Asian, Pacific Islander, disabled, LGBTQ) to their platform, with the social justice component, should call their movement “identity socialism.”

The young and old Americans who actually desire socialism express their desire to be taken care of by the daddy government, a desire of dependency that is stronger than the desire to be free.

I have actually been told by older relatives, who now live free of socialism and the Communist Party, that they wished to return to the country before the 1989 revolution, because today, they have to take care of themselves and it is hard.

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By A. Dru Kristenev —— Bio and Archives—August 26, 2020

While Pelosi and her communist cohorts – they made the jump from socialism long ago – work to bury the constitutional directives for conducting a legal election, they demand that the criminal elements burning and pillaging replace lawkeepers of the civil order. Could it be any more ironic that the lead legislator in the United States is also the lead proponent of complete lawlessness?

Pelosi is doing everything she can devise to undermine the Constitution, such as dismissing the House and authorizing proxy voting on legislation only to order them back in a concerted effort to cripple the national election with a flood of unverified mailed ballots. Each effort is to invent a “state” in her own image of Marxist ideology. It is that “state” for which true patriots bear enmity.

In her own way, Pelosi is correct because we constitutionalists will do all in our power to maintain the republic and not allow her and her anarchist goons to remake this nation into a democracy, or rather a mobocracy to echo Thomas Jefferson. Yet, that is precisely what the democrats are working so hard to do by supporting the mobs rioting in the streets. Night and day, democrats revile this nation, urging it be “transformed” into what amounts to a communist state that rules over the masses (that’s us) instead of the People ruling over the government that was created to serve the citizenry. That’s a concept our government has long since forgotten and abandoned.

Defenders of the Constitution will continue to be enemies of Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, the socialist fraudster “squad” and the whole maniacal democrat party’s vision of “state” in order to preserve and pursue the promise to “form a more perfect union.”

For the uninitiated, uneducated youth and some citizens in name only, that is a quote from the Preamble of the Constitution of the United States of America which many of us memorized in school when factual history of this country was still taught.

Despite what democrats claim, this nation was established “under God” by founders who used the Word of God as a guide to composing and affirming the Declaration of Independence as the legal document of America’s sovereignty and separation from tyrannical British rule.

That democrats would re-institute autocratic tyranny after 244 years via socialist-communist policies (feudalism by another name) is traitorous, confirming them as the real domestic enemies who willfully mutiny against the Constitution, America and the Sovereign People.

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Judi McLeod —— Bio and Archives—August 25, 2020

Sixty-nine days out from November 3rd, and it’s 2016 all over again.

Going back in time, a time frame millions will gleefully return to come November 3:

“This wasn’t an election. It was a revolution. (the inimitable Daniel Greenfield, Nov. 9, 2016.)

The Great Blue Wall crumbled. The impossible states fell one by one

“It’s midnight in America. The day before fifty million Americans got up and stood in front of the great iron wheel that had been grinding them down. They stood there even though the media told them it was useless. They took their stand even while all the chattering classes laughed and taunted them.

“They were fathers who couldn’t feed their families anymore. They were mothers who couldn’t afford health care. They were workers whose jobs had been sold off to foreign countries. They were sons who didn’t see a future for themselves. They were daughters afraid of being murdered by the “unaccompanied minors” flooding into their towns. They took a deep breath and they stood.

“They held up their hands and the great iron wheel stopped.

“The Great Blue Wall crumbled. The impossible states fell one by one. Ohio. Wisconsin. Pennsylvania. Iowa. The white working class that had been overlooked and trampled on for so long got to its feet. It rose up against its oppressors and the rest of the nation, from coast to coast, rose up with it.

“They fought and they won.

“This wasn’t a vote. It was an uprising. Like the ordinary men chipping away at the Berlin Wall, they tore down an unnatural thing that had towered over them. And as they watched it fall, they marveled at how weak and fragile it had always been. And how much stronger they were than they had ever known.”

“…Who were these people? They were leftovers and flyover country. They didn’t have bachelor degrees and had never set foot in a Starbucks. They were the white working class. They didn’t talk right or think right. They had the wrong ideas, the wrong clothes and the ridiculous idea that they still mattered.

“They were wrong about everything. Illegal immigration? Everyone knew it was here to stay. Black Lives Matter? The new civil rights movement. Manufacturing? As dead as the dodo. Banning Muslims? What kind of bigot even thinks that way? Love wins. Marriage loses. The future belongs to the urban metrosexual and his dot com, not the guy who used to have a good job before it went to China or Mexico.

“They couldn’t change anything. A thousand politicians and pundits had talked of getting them to adapt to the inevitable future. Instead they got in their pickup trucks and drove out to vote.

“And they changed everything.

“It’s midnight in America. CNN is weeping. MSNBC is wailing. ABC calls it a tantrum. NBC damns it. It wasn’t supposed to happen. The same machine that crushed the American people for two straight terms, the mass of government, corporations and non-profits that ran the country, was set to win.

Everything but the Democrats changed

“It was about the lost Democrats searching for someone to represent them in Ohio and Pennsylvania. It was about the union men who nodded along when the organizers told them how to vote, but who refused to sell out their futures.

“No one will ever interview all those men and women. We will never see all their faces. But they are us and we are them. They came to the aid of a nation in peril. The day when we stop being able to pull off the impossible is the day that America will cease to exist.

“Today is not that day. Today fifty million Americans did the impossible.

“Midnight has passed. A new day has come. And everything is about to change.”

Time proved that Greenfield was dead-on.  Everything but the Democrats changed.

His asking “Who were these people” could be truthfully answered today as the same people getting ready to get out and vote on November 3.

Democrats of “using COVID to steal an election”

They are the same people who watch their cities burned down by the riffraff called “peaceful protesters”  in Antifa and Black Lives Matter—without a word of rebuke from even a single Democrat; the same people who watched the Democrat Convention go down without a word against the pillage of America by street mobs with Democrats choosing to look the other way.

Though Biden, Harris, the Obamas and Clintons will never admit it, Democrat euphoria came to a dead halt on Monday when President Donald Trump got the truth out by accusing Democrats of “using COVID to steal an election”.

“Donald Trump said Monday that Democrats will try to steal the election in November by avoiding sending or accepting mail-in ballots from Republicans as he made a surprise visit to his party’s convention as they nominated him to be their presidential candidate. (Daily Mail, Aug. 24, 2020)

“‘They’re trying to steal the election from the Republicans, that’s what it means,’ Trump said during his remarks Monday afternoon in Charlotte, North Carolina.

“‘In a very nice way, I will tell you, they are trying to steal the election just like they did it last time with spying and we caught them.’”

After her hateful recriminations, Pelosi scurried rat-like to a corner

The first recriminations came raining down on the millions of Americans ready to vote Republican from Nancy Pelosi who accused GOP outright of being “the enemy of the people”.

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., escalated her attacks toward President Trump and GOP lawmakers Monday, describing them as “domestic enemies” over their opposition to universal mail-in voting. (Fox News, Aug. 24, 2020)

“During an interview on “MSNBC Live” with anchor Ayman Mohyeldin, Pelosi slammed Trump’s repeated rhetoric opposing mail-in voting and accused him of “scaring” potential voters and welcoming Russian interference in the upcoming election.

“The Russians were there and they are there now 24/7 trying to interfere in our election, but they’re not the only ones,” Pelosi said. “We take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And sadly, the domestic enemies to our voting system and our honoring of the Constitution are right at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with their allies in the Congress of the United States.”

“The speaker then urged Democrats to “mobilize,” “organize” and not allow Trump to “deter anybody from voting.”

“And again, support the postal system, which is Election Central,” Pelosi went on. “They’re doing everything they can [to] suppress the vote with their actions, scare people, intimidate by saying law enforcement will be there, diminish the role of the postal system in all of this. It’s really actually shameful. Enemies of the state.”

After her hateful recriminations, Pelosi scurried rat-like to a corner—the corner this time being U.S. Congress.

The miracle called the electoral DEFEAT of Joe Biden/Kamala Harris and the dirty Democrats is well on its way!

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Dennis Jamison —— Bio and Archives—August 25, 2020

Last week, the Democrat Party pushed out their version of truth, which normal people would call propaganda, but the words spewed out at their convention rang hollow. In fact, anyone suffering from a hangover due to the poisonous propaganda spread across the airwaves should be cured through a good dose of the GOP Convention this week. Yet, some of the propaganda that spewed forth from the “Demorants” at the convention is too hard to not comment on, too hard to pass up, especially speeches given by Hillary Clinton as well as Barack and Michelle Obama.

The Lies of Michelle Obama

One of the most startling realities that emerged from the Democrat Convention was Michelle Obama’s remarks in the keynote speech on the opening night were fact-checked by Associated Press, and that left-leaning news source called out Ms. Obama for the lies she tried to get away with as she repeated the outdated Leftist mantra that President Donald Trump was responsible for “ripping migrant children from their parents and throwing them into cages.” This had been   frequently used Democrat propaganda until some intelligent Democrats sorted it out, and were shocked by the lies of their leaders.

After fact-checking such lies of the leadership, some of the more honorable Democrats who had tweeted out photographs of “kids torn from their families and thrown into cages” from 2014, felt it important to delete their tweets unless they embarrass President Obama. Others, who cling to the lies, like Michelle Obama, or are too stupid to acknowlwedge the lie, continue to propagate it. Such actions are a simple admission from those who continue with the mantra, that they feel they can get away with circulating such lies among people too ignorant to know any better. What Michelle did was to bring the issue back to the surface.

It was President Obama’s Administration that built and used those cages to hold the kids of illegal migrants in temporary custody while their parent’s immigratin status was worked out.The Trump Administration followed similar policies of the Obama Administration in dealing with such a glut of illegals at the U.S.-Mexico border, and used the same or similar chain-link enclosures where migrant children were temporarily housed.

Michelle Obama was attempting to stir anger again that stirred emotions at the height of President Trump’s “zero-tolerance” immigration policy. The pictures of the children in cages were taken by the Associated Press, so they would know the truth of the matter. The fact that they would clarify it immediately after the lies were told is significant. May truth regain respect.

Actually, truth was rarely on display in the Democrat rantings last week, and it is noteworthy that Hillary Clinton also took her own jab at Trump “If he had put his own interests and ego aside, seeing the humanity in a child ripped from her parents at the border…” The extreme irony of such a statement in light of this summer’s shootings of so many innocent children shows how shallow and devoid of genuine concern for human life Democrats are.

These two women, two mothers, could bring up the years’ old issue of the illegal immigrant kids at the border being ripped from their parents (during the commission of criminal entry) while not saying one word about innocent black and white children who were killed on Independence Day—who were murdered—ripped from their parents forever. How heartless. And to think, these are considered two women to look up to as leaders in the Party proclaiming that “Black Lives Matter.” How hypocritical and self-serving. If these two women could put their own self interests and egos aside, there may have been some few words of compassion expressed in conjunction with the mention of the immigrant children.

Sadly, in their world only certain people matter. Truly, they show up as queens of ego. But Hillary Clinton went a step further in her admonishment of Trump in that full sentence: “If he had put his own interests and ego aside, seeing the humanity in a child ripped from her parents at the border, or a protester calling for justice, or a family wiped out by natural disaster, that would have been a good thing for America and the world.”

So, by Clinton’s perspective of reality, as well as the rest of the Democrat leadership, “the protestor calling for justice” obscured the anarchist destruction, the Antifa violence, and the BLM terrorism. All they seem to see, or pretend to see, is the “peaceful protestor” that a mainstream media portrays in their own version of propaganda. While it may have been hard for her to face reality head on, she was able to do her job as a good Democrat leader in endorsing Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as her Party’s 2020 nominees. Or, was it Barack Obama’s nominees?

Democrat Deep State Spying while Obama was POTUS.  Obama incompetent or complicit

In reality, much of the Party and the Democrat convention has been immersed within Obama’s shadow. Obama’s nefarious influence permeates the Party. His former Vice President currently is holding the proverbial “scepter of power” bestowed upon him at the convention. Yet, the real scepter is more in the hands of Kamala Harris. But, Obama as the puppet master showed up, and his cynical and vitriolic character was on full display last week. So were his attempts at his own version of reality.

In former President Obama’s speech on the 19th, he warned about President Trump, “This administration has shown it will tear our democracy down if that’s what it takes to win.” Such an Alinsky-esque tactic is way too obvious in the basics of accusing the opposition of the crimes oneself has committed. Of course, it is a slow justice system that is narrrowing down the various suspects in the crime of the century against “democracy.”

The audacious and nefarious process of spying on American citizens for political purposes that were initiated at the highest levels of our government to undermine a campaign of an opposition candidate, and then to undermine the outcome of a duly elected president of the United States is a good example of tearing down democracy, in order to win. Only, those efforts originated in the Democrat Deep State while Obama was POTUS. That either makes Obama incompetent or complicit. May justice be restored.

Obama’s warped mentality

Obama may also be found instrumental in utilizing the services of Al Sharpton and other less infamous individuals in instigating the rioting and violence of the Black Lives Matter terrorist organization. While Sharpton seems to have been the link between the Obama White House and the various rioting groups over what appeared as injustice in various racially charged events during the tenure of Obama, it was quite apparent that none of the Democrat support puppets at the convention did not decry the violence, rioting, and murders due to the anarchists, Antifa, and Black Lives Matter terrorists—Neither did Obama.

Instead of condemning the violence and the murders of innocents, Obama has gone on record for praising such young people who are taking to the streets as part of a “Great Awakening” of the youth who are “eager to take on some of the core challenges that have been facing this country for centuries.” So, citizens should see that Obama’s perspectives of reality are not only reflective of his warped mentality, it is being instilled in many of the gullible and naive young people who have not seen Obama for who he really is – a man of tremendous ego, narcissism, who honestly appears to care more about himself and his “legacy” than he does about the lives of the citizens of this country. His words were totally hollow.

Even more lame is that people don’t really know Joe Biden, the man who wants to be POTUS. Sadly, Biden didn’t have any new hollow words; according to the Gateway Pundit, they discovered he merely re-used the same hollow words from 2008.