The Wuhan Virus Growth Rate Was Never Like Ferguson Claimed!


The Cure is Far Worse that the Virus


A Motion was Made to Arrest Bill Gates in the Italian Parliament!


On the floor of the Italian Parliament, Gates was accused of intentionally looking to reduce the world population by 10-15%. He was said to be advocating genocide worst than what was on trial at Nuremberg. Our greatest problem right now is that ANY politician who refuses to even investigate what is going on NEEDS to be removed from office because they are part of this scheme be it a socialist, climate change or a vaccine dictator who wants to mandate vaccines but has denied your right to sue for any harm including death. This is a legal way people can even kill you with the wrong vaccine and they cannot be prosecuted thanks to politicians in many countries.

You will see in this video from the Italian Parliament that there are politicians who immediately protest and seek to protect Bill Gates. Why? Their hands are in his pockets you can rest assured of that fact. If they have nothing to lose, then let an investigation take place for they have no answers unless they are being paid to have none.

Just investigate and end all the accusations true or false. That is what a Democracy is supposed to do rather than a dictatorship. It is all of our human rights under the UN Charter to demand an investigation.

COVID-19 Compliance Circles Begin in New York City…


Comrades, the New York Ministry of COVID Compliance is taking every precaution to ensure your safety.  The scientists at the New York parks and recreation compliance bureau have designed a new social safety system to permit continued enjoyment.

The compliant metropolitan citizens are leading by example, and all good citizens are now enjoying the benefits of correct behavior. Continued compliance with the New York scientific standard for safe social engineering is greatly appreciated.

To further ensure your safety; while you explore the modified systems of freedom and liberty; the Ministry is providing uniformed Compliance Coaches, educators for our new society, at each of the designated parks and state approved recreation areas.

Pictured here you can see the joyful and happy faces of our new society as they enjoy their COVID freedom.  The Ministry is committed to a happy citizenry, and looks forward to your continued education. Please report any non compliant activities to your local compliance coach; and together comrades we will soon establish our new society.

Covid Madness Continues – Massachusetts Paints Instructional Arrows on Sidewalks…


Comrades, do not questions the purposes of the COVID Compliance Ministry.  We are evolving to a safer society, where madness replaces common sense.

Considering leadership within the big blue version of the ‘new normal’ promised that all changes to society will be driven by science, the COVID-19 virus variant in Massachusetts must be targeting people based on their direction of travel.  In order to keep people safe the police are painting fluorescent arrows on the sidewalk to inform the public which way to walk in order to avoid being attacked by the virus.  WATCH:

It’s not as much tyranny as nuttery.  If you face the right direction but walk backwards are you designated a rebellious scofflaw subject to municipal fines and police detention?

But seriously, despite my incapacity to keep a straight face, somewhere amid the town governance someone had to sit and scratch their puzzler to come up with this insanely stupid plan as a way to mitigate the virus… and then convinced others to do it.  Obviously these are the same people who wore genitalia on their heads to resist Donald Trump.

President Trump Warns Mitch McConnell: “Time is Running Out”…


Earlier today President Trump was again ‘subtle as a brick through a window’ in a tweetrequesting the senate get serious in exposing Obamagate and the soft coup effort:

Unfortunately, due to the dynamics of the UniParty, Mitch McConnell is very unlikely to take any action to expose prior misconduct; it would be against McConnell’s interests.

The Senate was not a passive entity in the various hoaxes against President Trump.  Factually, the Senate Intelligence Committee, and individual senators themselves, were active participants.  As a result just like AG Barr knows any discussion of SSCI security director James Wolfe’s non prosecution would expose DOJ corruption, so too does Mitch McConnell know senate investigations would expose senate corruption in both parties.

Republican members like John McCain actively participated; and republican members like Richard Burr willfully allowed the framework to continue.  Don’t forget it was Republican Senator Marco Rubio who first came to the defense of Democrat SSCI Vice-Chair Mark Warner when the covert communication with Chris Steele became evident.

In the big picture, the big ugly picture, republicans are just as complicit as democrats within all of the efforts to remove President Trump.  To this day the GOP controlled Senate Intelligence Committee is still spitting out reports defending the previous administration and proclaiming the vast Russian election conspiracy is genuine and real (it isn’t).

CTH readers are not blind to the DC structure where republicans and democrats are two wings of the same bird.  Co-dependent no more!  This is the Last Refuge because we no longer allow ourselves to suffer from ‘battered conservative syndrome‘.  On these pages we identify our republican abusers openly.

If ever President Trump was to go full wolverine on the corrupt GOP it would be the Big Ugly.  Alas, we are familiar with the political dynamic and fully accept that Mitch McConnell would rather give leadership to Chuck Schumer than lose his power, influence and affluence.

Anxious Trump voters have been understandably frustrated by the lack of speed with which President Trump is able to force the MAGA agenda onto an unwilling DC political apparatus. However, once you understand the Uniparty agenda the scope of the challenge is much easier to see.

How did the House write a $3 trillion legislative spending package when the legislators were not even in Washington DC?    Short version: they didn’t, the lobbyists did.

President Trump’s administration is adverse to the interests of the entire DC political system.  It’s a big club, and he’s confronting it.  Mitch McConnell has no incentive to help President Trump.

Remember…. Congress does not write laws or legislation, special interest groups do. Lobbyists are paid, some very well paid, to get politicians to go along with the need of the legislative group.

When you are voting for a Congressional Rep or a U.S. Senator you are not voting for a person who will write laws. Your rep only votes on legislation to approve or disapprove of constructs that are written by outside groups and sold to them through lobbyists who work for those outside groups.

While all of this is happening the same outside groups who write the laws are providing money for the campaigns of the politicians they need to pass them. This construct sets up the quid-pro-quo of influence, although much of it is fraught with plausible deniability.

This is the way legislation is created.

If our frame of reference is not established in this basic understanding we can often fall into the trap of viewing a politician, or political vote, through a false prism.

The modern origin of all legislative constructs is not within congress.

“we’ll have to pass the bill to, well, find out what is in the bill” etc. ~ Nancy Pelosi 2009

“We rely upon the stupidity of the American voter” ~ Johnathan Gruber 2011, 2012.

Once you understand this process you can understand how politicians get rich.  Mitch McConnell is not going to disrupt this system.

When a House or Senate member becomes educated on the intent of the legislation, they have attended the sales pitch; and when they find out the likelihood of support for that legislation; they can then position their own (or their families) financial interests to benefit from the consequence of passage. It is a process similar to insider trading on Wall Street, except the trading is based on knowing who will benefit from a legislative passage.

The legislative construct passes from K-Street into the halls of congress through congressional committees. The law originates from the committee to the full House or Senate. Committee seats which vote on these bills are therefore more valuable to the lobbyists. Chairs of these committees are exponentially more valuable.

Now, think about this reality against the backdrop of the 2016 Presidential Election. Legislation is passed based on ideology. In the aftermath of the 2016 election the system within DC was not structurally set-up to receive a Donald Trump presidency.

If Hillary Clinton had won the election, her Oval Office desk would be filled with legislation passed by congress which she would have been signing. Heck, she’d have writer’s cramp from all of the special interest legislation, driven by special interest groups that supported her campaign, that would be flowing to her desk.

Why?

Simply because the authors of the legislation, the originating special interest and lobbying groups, were spending millions to fund her campaign. Hillary Clinton would be signing K-Street constructed special interest legislation to repay all of those donors/investors.

Congress would be fast-tracking the passage because the same interest groups also fund the members of congress.

President Donald Trump winning the election threw a monkey wrench into the entire DC system…. In early 2017 the modern legislative machine was frozen in place.

The “America First” policies represented by candidate Donald Trump were not within the legislative constructs coming from the K-Street authors of the legislation. There were no MAGA lobbyists waiting on Trump ideology to advance legislation based on America First objectives.

As a result of an empty feeder system, in early 2017 congress had no bills to advance because all of the myriad of bills and briefs written were not in line with President Trump policy. There was simply no entity within DC writing legislation that was in-line with President Trump’s America-First’ economic and foreign policy agenda.

Exactly the opposite was true. All of the DC legislative briefs and constructs were/are antithetical to Trump policy. There were hundreds of file boxes filled with thousands of legislative constructs that became worthless when Donald Trump won the election.

Those legislative constructs (briefs) representing tens of millions of dollars worth of time and influence were just sitting there piled up in boxes under desks and in closets amid K-Street and the congressional offices. Legislation needed to be in-line with an entire new political perspective, and there was no-one, no special interest or lobbying group, currently occupying DC office space with any interest in synergy with Trump policy.

Think about the larger ramifications within that truism. That is also why there was/is so much opposition.

No legislation provided by outside interests means no work for lobbyists who sell it. No work means no money. No money means no expense accounts. No expenses means politicians paying for their own indulgences etc.

Politicians were not happy without their indulgences, but the issue was actually bigger. No K-Street expenditures also means no personal benefit; and no opportunity to advance financial benefit from the insider trading system.

Without the ability to position personal wealth for benefit, why would a politician stay in office? The income of many long-term politicians on both Republican and Democrat sides of the aisle was completely disrupted by President Trump winning the election. That is one of the key reason why so many politicians retired immediately thereafter.

When we understand the business of DC, we understand the difference between legislation with a traditional purpose and modern legislation with a financial and political agenda.

Mitch McConnell has the system.  President Trump has the people.

The battle continues….

McCarthy Discusses When Flynn Was NOT Unmasked and The Missing Pientka 302…


Former Chief Asst. U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy has an article written today pointing to the primary issue about former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn: “The Real Story is When Flynn Was Not Unmasked” – READ HERE.

McCarthy has reviewed the documents; looked at the research; reviewed what the IG said was not happening; and came to the same conclusion as CTH.  The Obama surveillance of Flynn did not include ‘unmasking’ because the collection was not incidental.

McCarthy points the media’s incurious compass needle toward the CIA, but don’t expect any DC media to follow it.  The truth is adverse to MSM interests.  There’s only one way for the Flynn-Kislyak call and content to be tracked, captured, discussed and shared by the Obama administration without the unmasking between 12/29/16 and 01/04/17.  A reverse targeted intercept on Flynn through Kislyak.  [CIA/NSA]  Read McCarthy Column Here

The previous administration, and their resistance defenders in the current administration embedded within the DOJ and FBI, are desperate to avoid any admission that incoming NSA Michael Flynn was under surveillance.  As soon as they can no longer hide the surveillance story, the shift to question the predicate of the Mueller investigation starts.

President Obama’ entire team (staff, officials, politicians); along with Republican allies like Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell et al; along with DOJ, FBI and IC preservationists like Bill Barr, Chris Wray et al; along with the entire DC media apparatus do not want to admit the Trump administration was under surveillance by the Obama administration. However, they can’t hide it because it happened.

On the Flynn 302 (the research evidence and documents are clear):

• The 302 was written by Joe Pientka on January 24, 2017.
• The 302 was edited by Peter Strzok prior to Feb 10, 2017.
• The 302 was re-edited by Lisa Page on Feb 10, 2017.
• Michael Flynn was fired on Feb 13, 2017.
• The 302 was discussed again on Feb 14, 2017.
• Andrew McCabe approved the edits on Feb 14, 2017.
• The 302 was officially finalized on Feb 15, 2017.

Obama Intrigue Grows As Judge Fiercely Protects Flawed Prosecution


Cynics Ask if Obama Dead-Enders Begged Judge to Resurrect Flynn’s Conviction to Save Barack?

Kelly OConnell image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 16, 2020

Obama Intrigue Grows As Judge Fiercely Protects Flawed Prosecution

INTRO & SULLIVAN’S SAVE
To begin, recall recently, after damning evidence surfaced of a corrupt FBI prosecution of an innocent 3-Star Star General, Fed Judge Emmet Sullivan was directed by the DOJ to vacate the conviction. The DOJ had already moved to drop the case. But instead, the Judge refused to reverse the plea deal and now acts like the entire matter is still a fair case. But why??

Question: Surprised the Judge overseeing Lt. Gen. Flynn’s Fed Prosecution isn’t angry at FBI shenanigans, but now doubles-down to save this half-aborted monster? Despite manifest problems with Gen. Flynn’s prosecution, Judge Emmet Sullivan might pursue perjury or contempt charges against Michael Flynn, apparently convinced defendant and family have not suffered enough.

So “contempt” is for Flynn’s “perjury” for admitting he lied to the Judge. Huh? Confused yet? Is it immaterial to Sullivan that Flynn was misled, did not receive Due Process, was menaced with a dead law, and threatened with jail and by family prosecutions? His FBI file was set aside when it was decided he answered honestly –  before being reopened to slander Flynn and use this for propaganda purposes.

WHAT MOTIVATES JUDGE?

Some theories bouncing around the internet follow: Did Obama’s people contact this judge to stress how incredibly important it was to hang onto some element of the Russia Investigation as being ethical to protect the FBI and Intelligence community? Did the judge realize his failure to notice the contrived nature of this case would ruin his reputation for probity? Perhaps the judge is a true believer in the progressive wing of grievance leftism? Maybe the judge just doesn’t like military folks, or Flynn specifically and still thinks he is a sellout? Perhaps he accepts “progressive” politics, where adherence to pragmatism means that the outcome equals justice?!! Or maybe this is all more gas-lighting.

But would there be any bigger cause than saving Obama’s reputation? Flynn’s lawyer, Sidney Powell, tweeted Sullivan could be acting at request of former President Barack Obama.

SHOULD FLYNN STILL BE SENTENCED? 

Obdurate refusal to cooperate leads to several disruptive decisions. Now what? Sadly, this will reinflate all pompous windbags who’ve spent 3 years lecturing us about how corrupt Trump’s staff is. But is there really a sound argument to convict Flynn for anything?

JUDGE GLEESON ARRIVES OPPOSED

Sullivan requested amicus briefs from any party. Further, Sullivan appointed former Fed Judge John Gleeson, to help on the DOJ’s request, ruling on the perjury charges. Gleeson judging Gen. Flynn is shocking, having just published an anti-Flynn screed. Wrote Gleeson, “Flynn’s guilt has already been adjudicated. So if the court finds dismissal would result in a miscarriage of justice, it can deny the motion, refuse to permit withdrawal of the guilty plea and proceed to sentencing.” But what if the court made a mistake, or if serious misconduct profoundly affecting the prosecution was exposed?

Does Gleeson’s choice expose liberalism’s worst error – conceit? Should the FBI prevail even in Due Process busting scenarios? There must be a rational reason for all the Trump hate which started with the FBI before he entered office. Maybe Trump imbalances what progressives feel is the natural order – leadership by Ivy League scions, as naturally socialist as philosophy professors.

LEFTISM’S INFLUENCE

Some might say the general problem with America is the shocking number of high officials across the nation whose values, thinking skills and habits are completely compromised by progressive fables – such as Marxism. And should you doubt Sullivan’s leftist passions, he once sent out an email to his entire federal email list for a Global Warming convention, then was taken to the woodshed for apparent open leftist ideology by the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals.

PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT

Whatever the story, Judge Sullivan still has an absolute duty to insure the US Federal Court does not perpetrate crimes or aid in the stripping of American citizens of their civil rights. This has nothing to do with personal feelings. And how does Sullivan square all of the dishonest elements of this prosecution? And the fact that Flynn was considered innocent until FBI “leadership” decided his case would be rewritten to make a prosecution? Whatever happened to Prosecutorial Misconduct?

The theory of prosecuting Gen. Flynn for perjury in a case where he suffered reckless bias, frame-ups and deceit by the FBI would, according to one blogger – be like charging a girl rent for her time spent in a closet where she was hiding from a convicted pedophile frantically kicking in doors to find her.

If an FBI agent is not conducting a formal, predicated, announced investigation of a suspect – how can a person be charged with lying to the authorities?

NATURAL LAW JUSTICE

Regarding rules which the Natural Law places on liberal democracy, John Finnis has written:

Deeper and more demanding than any constitutional or other legal limits on governments are the moral principles and norms which natural law theory considers to be principles and norms of reason, and which are limits, side-constraints, recognized in the conscientious deliberations of every decent person. The public responsibilities and authority of rulers do not exempt them from these limits:” no intentional killing of the innocent; no rape; no lies; no non-penal enslavement, and so forth. The reassertion of the truths that there are indeed such limits on government, and that they can well be articulated in the relatively modern language of truly inviolable rights (is essential). See Liberalism and Natural Law Theory, John Finnis.

But if Flynn’s conviction is upheld, the Fed Government will now stand for the proposition that regardless of how many rules or laws cops break for a conviction, it doesn’t matter.  For as long as there is a guilty plea – even if the charge is based upon bogus charges emanating from casual comments made to government workers, not under oath – the state can always claim a victory.

The point here is that all rulers and judges are under a moral, higher law which does not allow hoax setup prosecutions and kangaroo courts. And that general fairness and common sense can never be set aside, even when members of the society pursue their ambitions for greater power. And so targeting Gen. Flynn to trick him into pleading guilty to embarrass Trump and punish the General for supposed past sins is nothing short of evil, which no leader is justified to pursue.

A Time to Provide New Guards


There is a time to pray and a time for action. This is that time. Amen.

Fredy Lowe image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 15, 2020

A Time to Provide New Guards

There is but a single worded declaration from our late beloved Andrew Breitbart, which can be heard more prevalently today in the whispered voices or rumblings, in the thoughts and minds of many Americans, as our destructive forms of government no longer derive their power from the consent of the governed.

WAR!

“This is a struggle for the survival of our nation”

And, to help clarify our declaration, we need first to go back to that moment, on October 23, 2016, when then candidate Donald Trump gave his infamous stump speech where his words could not be more relevant today, saying:

For them it’s a war, and for them nothing at all is out of bounds. This is a struggle for the survival of our nation”

”…This election will determine whether we are a free nation or whether we have only the illusion of democracy, but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the system, and our system is rigged. This is reality, you know it, they know it, I know it, and pretty much the whole world knows it.”

These are, undoubtedly, fighting words for the perilous times in which we presently live. Dangerous, not only to our livelihoods, but to our very lives as well. Yes, we are in a struggle for the survival of our nation. Never have Americans seen their Democratic politicians take a sledge hammer to our once-booming-economy by indiscriminately closing down, essentially stealing the property of privately-owned businesses. One has to wonder if the Democrat governors came together knowing that, with their complicit media—nothing was out of bounds. Was it by a collective effort that they declared war on the citizens of their states by literally destroying their state economies? With the help of global special interests, did they use fear of the Wuhan virus as an election year tool to sabotage President Trump’s MAGA economy, which as you might recall, was running smoothly at the end of February with less than 3.5% unemployment?

Wuhan virus: Falsehoods, Fabrications, and One! Big! Lie!

Why else then would these same Democratic governors recklessly rely on their new found powers, executive orders, or verbal mandates, rather than using the existing civil laws of their states? What gave these governors authority to determine which where non-essential businesses, and to forcibly close them without a court order or legal hearing in front of a judge? Why were these business owners not given the opportunity to present affirmative alternatives which would have allowed the business to remain open without threatening the health and wellbeing of their customers? All affected business owners should not only be as-mad-as-hell but also wise enough to come together to form, or join, a class action suit to sue these wrongheaded governors for theft of their property.

People ask, when will this all end? But, there may be no direct or logical answer for them. In order to reopen businesses, Democrat governors are now demanding draconian measures of continued social distancing and contact tracking, as we the people become loose from our constitutional moorings in dangerously uncharted waters. Attorney General William Barr must speak out and put a stop to their unconstitutional dictates. Our country is imploding from within. Over 33 million Americans have lost their jobs, some never to return. Our basic supply chains have been broken, and it will be difficult, if not impossible, to repair them in any reasonable amount of time. Their tyrannical edicts will forever change the way in which we approach or consider our leadership in America. There are a number of Democrat run states where that leadership must be changed—now! And, there is no better time than – now – for a law firm that has been wronged by their governor’s illegal actions to begin the petitions process to have that governor recalled.

Nazi leader, Joseph Goebbles, once said, “Make the lie big, keep it simple and keep repeating it, and eventually, they will believe it”, which the Wuhan virus has been since its first inception, up to and including today, nearly five months later, nothing but falsehoods, fabrications, and One! Big! Lie!

Silenced by the complicit media, Google, YouTube, book

As most of you have come to know by now, their lockdowns have never been about our health or safety. Their lockdowns have never been based on true medical facts or science. Their lockdowns have been entirely political decisions to control the people. Something is very wrong here. Medicine, and medical decisions should be based on science, while many doctors have told us that quarantine, wearing masks, social distancing are actually harmful to the normal process of herd-immunity for combating any virus. A myriad of new facts have come to light proving that this may have been nothing more than a seasonal flu-like virus with readily available, inexpensive drugs, such as Hydroxychloroquine, which many front-line-doctors have been doing their best to get the word out, but have been silenced by the complicit media, including Google, YouTube and Facebook.

Their big lie has never been about science, it has always been about convincing enough fearful people that our only way back to a normal life (whatever that could possibly mean), is through their mandatory vaccines, compulsory contact tracking software or by tattoo, all with handsome profits for the Gates Foundation, the pharmaceutical companies and, in turn, large payoffs to all the corrupt Democrat politicians who kept their citizens in lockdown mode for months on end.

This is where the rubber meets the road and, unfortunately for President Trump, he once again finds himself surrounded by bureaucratic ideological opponents, where one might have considered Dr. Anthony Fauci to be just another.  But, the truth be known, Dr. Fauci is the one man who might be in a position to do what both Robert Mueller’s Russian Collusion, or Adam Schiff’s Impeachment failed to do, and that is what some are now calling Trump Removal 3.0 – this time by destroying his MAGA economy and with it President Trump’s chances for reelection.

The globalists and our Democrat governors are not locking us down for our protection

As President Trump forewarned us, Dr. Anthony Fauci can now be seen as one of a handful of global special interests, who are rigging the system. With the world’s lockdowns continuing, many now come to realize that something of this magnitude could not have been accomplished without massive logistics and international strategic planning. The global banks, pharmaceutical companies, along with the Gates Foundation and, of course, Dr. Fauci, for their mandatory vaccines, all had a hand in creating the fear of the Wuhan virus necessary to shut down the world economies.

But, there are many others who have benefited by monetarily stopping the buy or demand side, which has given them a controlled-depression to counter-balance the hyper-inflationary cycle that would have come had people kept spending while they continued printing their fiat currencies. The globalists and our Democrat governors are not locking us down for our protection, they are locking us down in order to restrict economic activity, which at the end of the day, is for their protection. And, as their planned second-wave of their disputatious virus comes in the fall, by November, they will have successfully removed President Trump from office.

“Justice will not be served until those unaffected are as outraged as those who are.”

At times like this we should be advised by the words of Ben Franklin, saying, “Justice will not be served until those unaffected are as outraged as those who are.” Knowing full well that there are few who can say they are – unaffected.

Where we go from here is really quite simple, for when a system of governance fails the people, righteous men rise up in organized civil disobedience. And, as Americans, take note that we hold these truths to be self-evident, and they are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights and that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

The time has come…whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these above stated ends, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and a time to provide new guards for our future security.

WAR!

There is a time to pray and a time for action. This is that time. Amen.

COVID: Brilliant new paper takes apart antibody testing


Antibody Testing for COVID-19

Jon Rappoport image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  — NoMoreFakeNews—— Bio and ArchivesMay 15, 2020

Antibody Testing for COVID-19

Assuming that a new virus called COVID-19 was actually discovered—-we are being told that antibody tests are a vital tool for determining who is immune and who is not.

These tests are heralded as essential and necessary, despite some downplayed doubt among “experts” about how reliable they are.

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealedclick here.)

Canadian author and long-time independent researcher, David Crowe, has written a new paper, “Antibody Testing for COVID-19.” (May 13, 2020).

I can safely say it is the most detailed analysis of the tests anyone will ever read.

It approaches the subject from a number of angles, and includes a breakdown of the test-kit manufacturers and the comparative results of their efforts to bring a useful test to the public.

Here are several devastating excerpts from Crowe’s very deep dive:

“The only jurisdiction with a formal structure for approval of antibody tests is the United States but, until very recently, it was a complete joke, as the test manufacturers did not need to provide validation data. Now it is only a partial joke, as validation data must be provided, but the FDA can only do a paper analysis. Imagine if auto-manufacturers had to build cars to certain EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) fuel efficiency standards, but rather than sending a car to the EPA for testing, they could do the testing at their facilities, and just send the results in afterwards…”

“Antibody tests are often subject to cross-reactions with other conditions. This could be because the [other irrelevant] medical condition produces similar antibodies, or because something related to that [other] condition reacts with other test components.  The choice of [cross-reacting] conditions to check for is completely under the control of the manufacturer and even when no cross reactions were found for a condition, the number of samples tested was so small that the possibility of a fairly high rate of false positive cross reactions still exists.”

“Positive antibody tests have only been found in a minority of people in the general population even where the virus is believed to have been circulating for months. These fractions are generally taken as truth, but one would expect a highly infectious virus to have spread much more widely…The one experiment that could show whether antibody tests are actually meaningful would be a time series of a large number of people who are currently negative on all tests. This experiment would be time consuming, inefficient (as many people would never become positive on any tests), intrusive (frequent nasal swabs and blood tests) and obviously very expensive. Those are practical considerations, but in the absence of such an experiment we are almost totally in the dark about COVID-19 antibody testing. Given the billions being spent on COVID and the trillions being lost by the economy, it surely is not impossible to do some worthwhile science.”