WA-3 Candidate Joe Kent Discusses Securing The Congressional Victory In The Final Weeks, Delivering America First


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 18, 2024 at 1:00 pm EST

The RFK Jr Impact on Ballots


Posted originally on the CTH on October 18, 2024 | Sundance 

There is a lot going on behind the scenes in the final weeks.  Most political observers are now keenly aware of the difference between “ballots” and “votes” as they pertain to key counties:  Fulton County, Georgia; Wayne County, Michigan; Philadelphia and Allegany counties, Pennsylvania; Clark County, Nevada; Milwaukee and Marquette counties, Wisconsin, and Maricopa County, Arizona.

These are the specific counties and cities (Philadelphia, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Detroit) where the process of mass-mail/distribution of ballots, in combination with the assembly/harvesting therein, meets the process of “ballot scanning” at county level tabulation centers.  However, there’s another facet, “ballot making.”

Many people, including Robert F Kennedy Jr himself and his legal team in court filings, have presented the 2024 situation and asked a question. Essentially:

Why did the DNC apparatus sue to keep RFK JR’s name off certain state ballots and simultaneously sue to keep him on certain state ballots?

It just didn’t make sense….

… Until now.

County-level ballots were contracted for localized printing by those who intended to use blank ballots for fraudulent purposes; essentially “ballot making.”

RFK Jr’s name ON or OFF ballots, changes the dynamic of the paper format and the physical alignment in the scanner.

The county tabulation scanners need one ballot format per county to scan for vote tally.

In states where they preprinted/made the fraudulent county level ballots *without* RFK Jr’s name, the DNC sued to keep him off.

In states where they preprinted/made the fraudulent county level ballots *with* RFK Jr’s name, the DNC sued to keep him on.

That’s the answer.

That also helps put context on how long this localized mass ballot printing and tabulation plan has been in place. WATCH:

The key location for 2024 ballot fraud detection…. are the tabulation centers! 

.

Mark Paoletta Discusses The False Narrative That Crime Isn’t That Bad Under Biden And Harris


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 17, 2024 at 8:00 am EST

Pastor Amanchukwu: “We Have The Opportunity To Slow The Spread Of Evil In This Country”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 17, 2024 at 7:00 am EST

Jayne Zirkle Details The ‘Influence America Summit’ Put On By The Heritage Foundation


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 17, 2024 at 7:00 am EST

The British are Coming – U.K Labour Party Sends 100 Staff to Assist Kamala Harris


Posted originally on the CTH on October 17, 2024 | Sundance

Apparently, some forms of foreign election influence are okay. According to recent reports the British Labour Party are sending their staff to the United States to run support operations in battleground states.

GREAT BRITAIN – The British Labour Party is sending approximately 100 current and former staff members to the United States to work for Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign in key swing states.

[SOURCE – LINKEDIN]

The left-leaning Labour Party won a majority in the Parliament in July, toppling the Conservative government and making Labour leader Keir Starmer the new prime minister.

In a post originally published on LinkedIn calling for more volunteers, Sofia Patel, head of operations for the Labour Party, wrote, “I have nearly 100 Labour Party staff (current and former) going to the US in the next few weeks heading to North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia.”

“I have 10 spots available for anyone available to head to the battleground state of North Carolina – we will sort your housing,” she added. (read more)

GB News reported, “Confirmation of a Labour campaign push raises doubts about the Prime Minister’s previously neutral stance on the 2024 US Presidential Election.”

It is worth remembering the British intelligence operation (Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), commonly known as MI6) was at the center of the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy in 2016.

Additionally, September 27th, 2024 – British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had a two-hour dinner with President Donald Trump after the U.K leader delivered a speech to the United Nations in New York.  However, intentionally unnoticed by U.S. media, the Prime Minister immediately left the U.S. following the lengthy meeting with President Trump, and never met with Kamala Harris.

The extensive discussion and dinner took place in New York, apparently at Trump Tower.  There is an aspect of typical British worry woven throughout British media reporting on the meeting because U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy, also attended the meeting.  Lammy once called President Trump a “woman-hating, neo-Nazi sympathizing sociopath.”

Jonathan Keeperman Breaks Down The Numbers On The FBI’s Revised Crime Statistics


eperman

Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 16, 2024 at 7:00 am EST

Mark Halprin Predicts What Will Happen When Trump Wins – Pretends Not to Remember 2016


Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance

Mark Halprin gives his prediction about what will happen when President Trump wins the election.  Tucker Carlson plays along, with both pretending not to remember what happened in 2016.

What Mark Halprin predicts, is exactly what happened in 2016.  WATCH:

Every single thing in this response is exactly what happened in 2016.  The silly part is both Tucker Carlson and Mark Halprin pretending not to remember what happened.  Some reminder pictures from 2016 below.

In 2016 the Democrats: ~ organized a refusal to certify the election ~ boycotted the inauguration ~ claimed Russia hacked the election ~ broke out in violent protests, including arson, on inauguration day ~ put their genitals on their heads ~ conducted violent protests ~ began the Trump-Russia campaign for the next two years; then tried impeachments.

Tucker Carlson and Mark Halprin Pretend 2024 is really 1998


Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance

In this interview Tucker Carlson talks with Mark Halprin, a well-connected journalist that Tucker Carlson cites as the epicenter of all political power and journalistic knowledge since the mid-1980’s. Accordingly, the magnanimous and enlightened Mark Halprin knows more about the institutions of electoral influence, political power structures, people and organizations of political influence than most journalists, so sayeth Carlson.  And so, their discussion follows along.

If you are nostalgic for the time before you saw the strings on the political marionettes, and/or you like to remind yourself how you viewed politics in the era long before elections were decided by ballots instead of voters, you will enjoy this satiating conversation of how things used to be.

Both Halprin and Carlson pretend things are just like they were, while they apply 1998 political insight to the 2024 election year, and -for some reason- people discuss it.

However, if you have stopped pretending and you understand that modern political outcomes are determined by ballot systems, local ballot printing, fraudulent voter rolls to give the illusion of attribution to the locally printed ballots, and tabulation centers that conduct the necessary scanning of unattributed ballots to a number needed to generate the outcome, then this food-filled discussion about political sides between Halprin and Carlson ends up leaving you somewhat hungry.

Here’s an example.  Within the interview Mark Halprin notes that Kamala Harris campaign has raised over a billion dollars, and that’s just the money from inside the campaign; there’s much more from “outside groups and interests.”  With jaw-agape Carlson curiously asks where that money came from?  Halprin replies, “I have no idea,” and they simply move along.

Yes, the conversation is about various subsets of voters, black men who don’t support Harris as much, and a multitude of other various popular narratives that surround the 2024 election as written in various media.  Let me cut to the proverbial chase, none of that stuff matters.

Yes, along the same approach expressed by the Halprin’s and Carlson’s of the world, Barack Obama might be calling out the “brothers” who do not intend to vote for Kamala Harris.  However, in the real world of 2024 a very non-pretending James Clyburn might just as well say, “yes they are, they just don’t know it.”  Why, because Clyburn controls the ballots of “the brothers”; their voting intent is irrelevant.

Thus, we highlight once again the distinction between voters and ballots that seems intentionally lost amid a constructed interview between the very enlightened Halprin and the curiously incurious Carlson.

What exactly is the value of the conversation when the subject matter surrounding it is as useful to the 2024 election as vinyl records to modern rap music.  You decide.

To answer the question about Kamala Harris’ extraordinary fundraising, let’s just revisit demonstrable history.

First, James Clyburn’s operation was constructed during the Obama era through the financing of something called the Pigford Settlement.  Yes, Pigford-I was the payment mechanism behind taxpayer funds being shifted from govt to the very specifically black community.  The Clyburn team, along with legal powerhouses like Morgan & Morgan, were part of the payment distribution architecture.

With the capital to start the mechanics of the AME ballot scanning operation now financed, along comes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, set up by Elizabeth Warren, to funnel fines and pressure payments from the USA banking and finance sector to a host of progressive networks, ie community organizing groups.

There you go.  That’s the ‘elevator speech’ answer behind the odd “I don’t know” retort of Mark Halprin.

What was the intent of this interview?  I have no idea.  However, what they discuss seems like a conversation that might have been pertinent to elections many cycles ago, but not now.

In the modern era facilitated by the rise of Teh One Lightbringer of all political truth, what many might remember as our promised “fundamental change,” voters are irrelevant to the outcome.

That said, there are very serious efforts underway to apply tactical civics in this new battleground.  In that contest based on reality we destroy local ballot printing operations, block the use of fraudulent voter rolls and find industrious ways to stop the secret scanning operations within the AME network of 17 county tabulation centers.

If tactical civics are successful, and we are about to discover that “if” answer, then the conversation that Halprin and Carlson are currently having might reapply in the next election.  However, until then, talking about what voters intend to happen while ignoring the irrelevance therein, seems to miss the proverbial point of where we are in the modern era of ‘ballot collection’ elections.

Chapters:
0:00 Become a Member at TuckerCarlson.com
1:23 The State of the Presidential Race
6:37 Does Kamala Harris Stand For Anything?
12:23 What Is Harris’s Relationship Like With Joe Biden?
14:34 Harris Can’t Answer This Simple Question
16:01 What Do Harris’s Donors Think?
17:26 Mark Halperin’s Reporting That Biden Would Give up the Nomination
28:45 The Worst Scandal in American Journalism
31:09 Was the Biden/Trump Debate a Setup?
40:17 Covering the Trump Campaign
51:54 How Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama Took Out Biden
1:02:19 Corporate Media’s Self-Destruction and the Future of News
1:10:43 Black Men Are Voting for Trump
1:16:32 Why Is Our Voting System So Complicated?
1:18:58 Who’s Winning the Swing States?
1:19:54 Who’s Winning Nevada?
1:21:40 Who’s Winning Arizona?
1:25:55 Who’s Winning Georgia?
1:27:36 Who’s Winning North Carolina?
1:28:54 Who’s Winning Wisconsin?
1:29:39 Who’s Winning Michigan?
1:30:32 Who’s Winning Pennsylvania?
1:34:00 Here Is What the Private Polls Are Saying
1:39:21 War and NATO
1:50:15 RFK Jr. Being Anti-Establishment
1:53:48 Who Is Running the Country Right Now?
1:55:11 Trump Derangement Syndrome Will Be the Biggest Mental Health Crisis in American History
1:58:49 What Happens If Trump Loses?

NARCISSISM: […] If Trump wins, Obama might be seen as the aberration in the history of American politics, rather than Trump and his nativist authoritarianism. Obama acolytes have spent the last eight years rationalizing Trump as the last gasp backlash to the Democrat and his presidency. (link)

Fulton County Judge Blocks Georgia State Requirement to Hand Count Paper Ballots


Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance

The Georgia state election rule is simple. Remove the paper ballots from the containers after voting and hand count the number of paper ballots. The number of paper ballots must match the number of electronically recorded votes and voters. If it does not there is a problem.  This rule also starts a paper trail putting the physical number of ballots on the record before they reach the Fulton County ballot scanning tabulation center.

It is a simple rule that says the number of ballots must match the number of voters. Easy peasy. The purpose of the rule is simple, make sure ballots are not double counted or scanned multiple times at the tabulation center. However, citing electoral anxiety, January 6th, and the lack of training poll workers on how to count numbers, a Fulton County judge has blocked the hand count. Apparently counting the number of physical papers is too difficult for Fulton County poll workers…. or, there is something else in play.

You can read the ridiculous judicial ruling HERE.

[SOURCE pdf]

You can read about Judge Robert McBurney HERE.  Let me be very clear without pretense…..  The Fulton County corrupt ballot system is dependent on scanning ballots multiple times.  This is what they did in 2020; this is why duplicate ballots were found in scanned ballot imaging and this is what they planned to do in 2024.  Run the Kamala Harris ballots multiple times to manufacture additional Harris votes.

Judge Robert McBurney is intentionally, with malicious intent, blocking the simple verification process that would have stopped the corrupt AME poll workers from scanning batches of ballots multiple times.  Judge Robert McBurney is facilitating the intent of ballot fraud. Fullstop.

(Via Politico) – […] “Should the Hand Count Rule take effect as scheduled, it would do so on the very fortnight of the election,” he wrote. “As of today, there are no guidelines or training tools for the implementation of the Hand Count Rule.”

His order, which followed lengthy hearings in his courtroom, only temporarily stays the decision; it could be appealed to a higher court in the state for this year or eventually go into effect in future elections.

Late last month, Trump-aligned members of the Georgia State Election Board pushed through the controversial policy requiring hand-counting of ballots. Local poll workers would not be tallying results but counting the raw number of ballots cast and comparing them to the machine-counted total.

It was an incredibly late change that state and local election officials warned would be a labor-intensive process. They warned that the process would delay results by hours in the battleground state (more)

Once the unknown number of ballots reach the tabulation centers, the unknown number of ballot scans can take place.

How Georgia Republican poll watchers can organize to stop the double counting of ballots at the “tabulation center” is unknown.  However, this is now the only hope that republicans have in Georgia to stop a repeat of the fraud that was perpetrated in 2020.

More than likely the Fulton Country tabulation center will be isolated from any external eyes on their manipulative and deceptive practices.  It will now be up to the rest of the state to try and vote in a significant enough quantity to overwhelm the multiple ballot scans that will be taking place at the Fulton County tabulation center.

This is ridiculous!