James Clyburn Visits 10 Key Precincts for Ballot Collection in Three Wisconsin Cities (Madison, Milwaukee, Beloit) and No One Notices


Posted originally on the CTH on July 3, 2024 | Sundance 

Once you see the strings on the marionettes you can never watch the performance and not see them.  The same thing happens when you know the details of how ballots are different than votes, and how the ballots are manipulated.

U.S. elections are no longer about “votes,” modern elections in America are about “ballots”.   As we have seen in several election cycles, the election winner is not the person who gets the most votes – the election winner is the person who collects, submits and ultimately counts the most ballots.  The same is true for the presidential electoral victory; it’s the person who gets the most ballots, not votes.

So, let us start by asking the right question:  What is a representative from South Carolina doing in Wisconsin visiting ten key ballot counting precincts in three key cities, Madison, Milwaukee and Beloit?   Anyone?  Anyone?   The story gets even more interesting when you see what text messages about ballot ordering followed James Clyburn’s visit.  First, the citation for the visit [04:00 video]:

You, me and likely millions of deep political researchers know exactly what James Clyburn is doing.  But ask yourself why this is so out in the open and not confronted.  You know exactly who James Clyburn is and what his function consists of within the Democrat party election process, but how do we get everyone else to see it?

At the end of the ballot harvesting operation in the key state counties for Democrats, there are precinct workers who are then tasked with counting those ballots.  The number of ballots needed to change the outcome of the election, is essentially the determining factor in how many ballots are scanned by the precinct workers in the key districts.

Most of the regional precinct workers in the key counties that change the elections, are affiliated with and originate from the African Methodist Episcopal church.  This is who James Clyburn was visiting and organizing.  In person coordination eliminates the need for a paper trail.

The African Methodist Episcopal (AME) church, has precinct level ballot counting election operations (poll workers) in the key counties [Fulton (GA), Wayne (Mich), Philadelphia and Pittsburgh (PA), Clark (NV), Maricopa (AZ), Dane (WI), etc.]  The ballot counting doesn’t need to happen all over the state, just at the key urban county level.

The DNC operation (Obama/BLM network) concentrates heavily on the ballot harvesting.  However, when they turn those ballots over to the county level precinct workers, that’s where the AME church network and South Carolina Representative James Clyburn come into play. {GO DEEP}

The DNC no longer focuses on controlling the Secretary of State or Attorney General approach.  With the George Soros machine running the District Attorney level angle the democrats only need to concern themselves with the precinct level poll worker support.  Clyburn’s AME network is protected by the willfully blind George Soros DA’s.   It’s a one-hand washing the other-hand proposition.

One Politico reporter plays the pretending game with James Clyburn in a recent interview.  The reporter, just like you, me and Catherine Englebrecht, know exactly how this election manipulation game is rigged, but they maintain the pretenses within the questions.

Once you know exactly how the outcomes are reached in those counties, then the remarks by Clyburn take on the accurate context.  [TRANSCRIPT HERE]

JAMES CLYBURN – […] “I think Joe Biden is doing exactly what he needs to do to win reelection. Something is amiss with the polling.”

Clyburn knows his poll worker network can essentially run the ballot counting operation without fear or concern because George Soros has put the District Attorney’s in their pocket.  And, with the media cooperating, if anyone raises an objection or notices something sketchy, the ballot gathering group have the RACE CARD to immediately play.

If another 20 million actual American people vote for Donald J Trump the system has an offset.  The millions of illegal aliens who have entered the country are generating millions of additional ballots that might be needed.

The illegal aliens don’t need to vote, they just need to generate ballots by registering their physical presence in the correct state or county as needed.  The ballot collection and ballot counting groups will do the rest.

This is the challenge to overcome in the 7 to 11 counties where the 2024 operation will be executed.  The ballot fraud operation is not a massive conspiracy or large-scale enterprise, it is less than a dozen counties strategically located in key states.

In 2020 and again in 2024, Joe Biden has made several trips to the Mother Emanuel AME Church in South Carolina where he is introduced to the AME precinct captains, ballot stuffers, electioneering tabulators and vote counters.

Immediately after James Clyburn visited Wisconsin last weekend the following text messages were sent to residents.

The timing here is not coincidental.

Sunday June 30th

Tuesday July 2nd

.

Internal Link

(source)

.

Ballots in the mail are apparently very important to My Vote Wisconsin.

Once you see the strings on the marionettes, you can never return to that moment in the performance when you did not see them. The cold, stark reality of the thing just sits there, staring you in the face, regardless of the discomfort it creates in the process.

.

Gavin Newsom Heads to White House to Rally Support for Joe Biden


Posted originally on the CTH on July 3, 2024 | Sundance 

Oh, they’re good… the Pelosi clan are really good.

I once saw an interview with Nancy Pelosi’s daughter where she was asked about her mom and Alexandra Pelosi said something very matter-of-factly like, “my mom can smile, slice your neck with a razor blade and you’d never know she did it.”  That’s the thought that comes to mind within this story.

Gavin Newsom is heading to the White House with various governors to meet with Joe Biden.  However, Newsom is going to show “support” for Biden remaining in the 2024 presidential race.  I mean, this guy with the invisible blades is good, really good.

SACRAMENTO, California — Gov. Gavin Newsom will travel to Washington on Wednesday to attend a meeting between President Joe Biden and Democratic governors amid the fallout from the president’s disastrous debate with former President Donald Trump.

“Governor Newsom will head to White House tomorrow to attend the Governors meeting and to stand with the President,” a spokesperson for the California Democrat said late Tuesday.

As White House aides scramble to tamp down fears about the president’s cognitive abilities in the wake of Thursday’s shaky debate performance, Biden will gather with Democratic governors and congressional leaders Wednesday evening. The meeting follows a Monday call when two dozen Democratic governors gathered to discuss among themselves how they should respond to the crisis situation.

Newsom, whose name frequently appears in polls alongside other Democratic surrogates like Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker as potential replacements, was not on the call.

Newsom is a steadfast Biden supporter and was on hand in Atlanta last week to try to buoy the president from the spin room after the debate that saw the 81-year-old incumbent appearing confused and struggling to answer some questions. Newsom, while acknowledging a lackluster performance, quickly dismissed calls for Biden to step aside, saying that the American public should look at his record in office — not a 90-minute debate.

Newsom has continued offering vocal — and financial — support for the Biden campaign in the days since the debate, helping raise several hundred thousand dollars for the president and the Democratic National Committee in the hours after it aired. (read more)

Steve Bannon: Prepare Yourselves- The Left Is Going To Try To Imprison Trump On July 11


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: July 01, 2024 at 09:00 am EST

Were Politics Always This Divided?


Posted originally on Jul 2, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Politics were never divided to the level we see today. I have people write in to say that politics has always been a divisive and dirty game. While that is true, there is no denying that America has never been less united. Socrates is not forecasting a typical partisan debacle come election season, rather, Socrates is predicting a massive rise in civil unrest that will explode by the beginning of September. By 2028, there may not be a US Presidential election at all.

Take a look at the video above. One may recall the division that took place when Barack Obama was running for president. There has always been the left v the right, but there was humanity. Everyone still identified as an American, first and foremost. The debates today have come down to outright battles between the two sides where neither feels the other deserves to exist on the same land. In the movie “Civil War,” one separatist soldier questioned, “What kind of American are you?” This line of thinking is precisely what we see today, and it is precisely on time.

Cicero 5

We are in the final stages of the decline and fall of republics. When the founding fathers founded America, they cited Cicero who was the fake news of the ancient world – eventually they beheaded him and nailed him, he was that bad. They thought it was a republic against monarchy or, effectively, a republic is always the most corrupt because everyone is up for sale. The scenario created is far worse than a dictatorship, as one cannot bribe a dictator.

Simply look and listen to the current president of the United States, the most powerful man in the world who cannot hold a coherent thought. Juxtaposing his speech and mannerisms to only a few years ago is simply tragic. He has declined into a shell of his former self. The establishment will not allow Biden to step away from power without utterly humiliating him first so that there is no question as to why they must swap out their candidate.

CBS conducted a survey that found 72% of all voters questioned the president’s cognitive abilities. We are not merely questioning his policies, but we are questioning whether he is fit enough to function. About 35% of Americans still held onto false hope that Biden could physically serve another term, but that dropped to a mere 27% after his debate with Donald Trump. The establishment believes that We the People are idiots when we can clearly see that our president has a serious mental impairment. What’s worse is that one side still believes people will vote for a senile man.

They are deliberately creating outrage among the public and failing to listen to the wishes of the people. The newly installed candidate who will replace Biden will “save the day” in the eyes of the Democrats, but that person will merely fuel the anger on the right. The left has been the most outspoken in terms of their discontent with the government, even under a liberal administration. What will they do if their candidate loses? The corrupt legal system like Manhattan DA Alvin Braggs will not prosecute anyone on the left. The right has been demonized and backed into a corner.

The 2024 US Presidential Election will not follow the normal discourse of Republicans v Democrats. We have two completely different schools of thought competing for the future of America as we have known it. Economics drives everything and NO ONE is content with the current state of the economy, but they do not understand how it functions and are willing to assign blame to either party. It has taken years, a pandemic, mass migration, and woke politics to fuel a landscape of absolute hate. I fear that a civil war is inevitable as both sides want to reclaim their version of America.

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine – Reining in the Deep State


Posted originally on Jul 1, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

US Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has overturned the Chevron deference in a 6-3 vote in a major push toward eliminating government overreach. The 1984 Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council has permitted government agencies to implement the rule of law, bypassing the federal judicial system.

Deep State 1

Individuals and Corporations have been at the mercy of agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which was permitted to implement regulations over entire industries as it saw fit. That violated the Constitution, for the laws are to be made by the PEOPLE, and Congress should NEVER delegate that power to an unelected agency that creates the Deep State. Conservatives have attempted to overturn the Chevron doctrine for years, as it simply places the law in the hands of unelected government officials.

Rosevelt FDR Drawing

Justice Roberts said Chevron violated the Administrative Procedure Act (1946), which dictates how government agencies may issue and develop regulations. The APA was intended to inform the public of how and why rules were implemented and provided a platform for public participation. It also created a clear standard for proceedings and restated judicial review. The APA was implemented after Franklin D. Roosevelt created an onslaught of public agencies through the New Deal. Chief Justice Roberts further stated that the Chevron doctrine was “misguided” as it made the rule of law ambiguous.

For 40 years, the Chevron doctrine has corrupted every aspect of American life, from health care to labor laws. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) deferred to public agency interpretations of the law, which was outrageous that non-elected and non-judges make the law. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had the authority to control what Americans content Americans could consume, and they abolished the Fairness Doctrine with no regard to how that would harm society with fake news.

The Food and Drug Administration (FD) had the authority to control what it deemed safe for Americans to consume. With COVID-19, they prohibited anyone from advocating drugs that worked all because funding comes from the Pharmaceutical companies. This has by no means benefited society and this decision was so necessary to restore some accountability.

2024_06_29_11_04_46_Justices_limit_major_SEC_tool_to_penalize_fraud_SCOTUSblog
7th Amendment

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) had the ability to define American financial markets. The SEC has just been overruled where they were charging people, imposing penalties, and refusing to allow what the Constitution supposedly guaranteed – the right to trial by jury under the 7th Amendment.

Absolutely every facet of American life is partially controlled by unelected government agencies who need not abide by a uniform rule of law before implementing regulations. What the SEC has been doing has rejected the Constitution for decades. Once you hand this unbridled power to any agency, you get tyranny. What is WRONG WITH OUR LEGAL SYSTEM is that whenever Congress or an agency write any law or rule, they should go to court to establish that it is Constitutional. Instead, they pick on people who cannot afford lawyers to expand their tyranny, and it is always our burden for someone to challenge them and make it to the Supreme Court. That is outrageous.

The Supreme Court ruling is a major blow to the administrative Deep State. It is ABOUT TIME! This aims to de-politicize government agencies to control our very way of life. Executive branches need to be reined in dramatically, especially at a time when industries such as the EPA are driving entire sectors into the ground, outlawing gas stoves that I grew up with, and I think I’m still alive. The liberals in favor of Chevron believe Congress should be trusted to defer power to agencies, which they believe will rule based on expertise, laughably unbiasedly.

The reason I say we need a Constitutional Court that Congress and agencies go to first for PERMISSION to create the rule of law is that they get to rule the country by sheet tyranny. In my case, they seized the foreign companies, denied using any funds, would not allow them to answer complaints, and installed a receiver, Alan Cohen, who refused to defend the companies or even answer a complaint. This amounted to violating the 5th Amendment, illegally taking my companies, and denying them any right to defend themselves.

They threw me in contempt of court using 28 USC 1826, where the statute states the maximum time is 18 months, not 7 years, and that I was supposed to have a right to appeal in 30 days, which was NEVER honored by the Second Circuit. The very prison records show the contempt was renewed every 18 months, and the ONLY way I was ever released was when I finally made it to the Supreme Court, and they ordered the government to explain. They released me and told the Court the case was then moot. If they can do this to me, steal the pensions of 240 employees, they can do it to anyone.

SCT 2020
28 use 1826
BOP Screen 18 months

Supreme Court Overruled Jan 6th Charge


Posted Jun 29, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

Pelosi Son in law Jan 6th

Pelosi’s Son-in-law

The Supreme Court just ruled in favor of the Jan. 6 defendant in a dispute over an obstruction charge that was clearly unconstitutional and a selective prosecution. The Court ruled in favor of a former Pennsylvania police officer charged for his alleged participation in the U.S. Capitol attack, saying a felony obstruction charge was improperly applied in his case. It was a 6-3 opinion that came from Chief Justice John Roberts but was joined by a Democratic appointee, Ketanji Brown Jackson. The majority also included Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh.

In the debate, Biden called those people criminals. The case centered on whether a 2002 law enacted in the wake of the Enron scandal to prevent the destruction of evidence in financial crimes could be used against defendant Joseph Fischer and others alleged in an attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. My investigation was this: this was most likely organized by the FBI to enable Pelosi to declare an emergency rule to shut down 7 states that were challenging the vote. They had to call this an insurrection to try to go after Trump on the 14th Amendment, but then to imprison everyone who dared to support him. Had just one challenge been allowed, the case could have ended in the Supreme Court, and Trump would have been president. But we would not have an open border, climate change nonsense, and this proxy war in Ukraine, the Middle East, and Asia had the Neocons not gained power under Biden.

The court’s majority wrote that the twisted interpretation of the statute was overly broad. To prove a violation of the law at hand, the court said; “the Government must establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects.”

Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s reasoning is very disturbing, and she was appointed by Trump. In her dissent, she said that while the events of Jan. 6 may not have been the target of the 2002 law, it includes a sweeping provision for any conduct that obstructs or impedes any official proceeding. Barrett wrote:

“The Court does not dispute that Congress’s joint session qualifies as an ‘official proceeding’; that rioters delayed the proceeding; or even that Fischer’s alleged conduct (which includes trespassing and a physical confrontation with law enforcement) was part of a successful effort to forcibly halt the certification of the election results.”

“Given these premises, the case that Fischer can be tried for ‘obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding’ seems open and shut. So why does the Court hold otherwise?” she continued. “Because it simply cannot believe that Congress meant what it said.”

I am very disappointed in Barrett for her position. If any prosecutor can twist the words of a statute to apply to a new theory, then somehow that is OK. The Constitution declares that the PEOPLE are to draft laws – not prosecutors. If you put cash in a safety deposit box, that can now be charged as Money Laundering because you are “hiding” money from the government. The money laundering statute was created against drug dealers. What Barrett advocates is total tyranny by unelected prosecutors to twist the words into things that Congress never expressed.

Attorney General Merrick Garland expressed disappointment in the court’s decision but said it would have a limited impact on the Justice Department’s prosecutions. He is only maintaining the right to twist statutes to suit political agendas. Garland said in a statement.

“The vast majority of the more than 1,400 defendants charged for their illegal actions on January 6 will not be affected by this decision.” 

Meanwhile, Garland is facing arrest for contempt of Congress, and we see how the Department of Justice is totally out of control, refusing to prosecute Garland when they throw Bannon in prison for contempt of Congress. This is selective prosecution, and the DOJ is now just political.

Julie Kelly The Real Hero In SCOTUS Fischer Decision


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: June 28, 2024 at 07:50 pm EST

DeGrasse: Debate Causes Political Earthquake In Senate And House Seats


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: June 28, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

The Real Debate?


Posted originally on Jun 28, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

Debate RFK

COMMENT#1: You were correct. This debate was a conspiracy for Hillary. That’s why they did not let RFK on stage.

GL

COMMENT #2: Joe Biden’s condition makes me believe he was sent to that podium as a sacrificial lamb to show the world why they need to switch their candidate. That debate was humiliating.

CD

COMMENT #3: Your sources have always been incredible. You called this months before any agreement for a debate.

HS

COMMENT #4: Marty, You even keep those of us in Washington updated when we are not in the loop. Thank you for what you do.

Anonymous

REPLY: This was a setup, and now you have the press worldwide discussing replacing Biden. NEVER before did you have a debate before the candidates were nominated. This was to give Hillary time, and now everyone is talking about replacing Biden. CNN was part of this and specifically asked about his age. They were respectful because they were in this plot from the start.

I feel sorry for Biden, for they trashed this guy all for the Neocons, who are ruthless, evil people. They are destroying the USA with their endless wars, driving inflation and deficits through uncharted territory; this is raising taxes and now the elimination of paper and money, all to keep their hatred going forward. They have managed this for their candidate, Hillary, who would nuke Canada to get three Russians.

pushing_button_down_300_clr_7489

They would not allow RFK on stage because this was NEVER supposed to be a debate. They knew Biden was losing it. This was to covertly allow Hillary to be drafted and Biden will “voluntarily” step down, which is also required under the rules. But they had to embarrass him before the entire world just to retain that power to push that red button to wipe out their lifelong enemy – Russians, Chinese, and anyone else who dares to disagree with them. Perhaps Newsom is for VP – not president.

Wait…. Why Did Politico Have a Debate Response Journalist Embedded Within an “Assisted Living Facility”?


Posted originally on the CTH on June 28, 2024 | Sundance

Sometimes, when you ask the right questions, you don’t ask why people in assisted living facilities suddenly realize Joe Biden is more than a few french fries short of a Happy Meal, and instead you ask why Politico proactively had a journalist embedded in an assisted living facility to get feedback on Joe Biden.

Seriously.  What did Politico know about the debate in advance, such that it was an assignment to have a top headline article prepped?  I think we all know the answer to that question.  Essentially, the entire professional political class in DC knows about an operation to replace Joe Biden.  If you understand that is the plan, you adjust your corporate assignments accordingly.  Politico did just that.

(Politico) – […] “How Biden’s devastating debate went over at an assisted living facility” –  For Biden, it was a disaster. His allies had seen the debate as his best chance yet to ease concerns about his age, a persistent liability for his campaign. And the perception of older voters — who turn up to vote at higher levels any other age group — is critical to the Democratic president. He lost voters 65 and older to Donald Trump by 5 percentage points in 2020, but is courting them aggressively in the run-up to November.

Nothing his contemporaries saw here Thursday helped his case. “I think that he is rushing it, and he’s not looking at the camera for the most part,” said Meg Maguire, 81, who was visiting the facility to watch the debate with her husband. She said, “In terms of just physical relationship to the camera, Trump is doing better.”

[…] And by the first commercial break on Thursday — when at least three residents here had nodded off — the damage to Biden had been done.

“Let’s face it, a debate is a performance,” said Claire Moses, 83. And she offered a blunt assessment of the one that Biden was turning in.

“Biden is not a good performer,” Moses said. “And I’m very sad tonight because I think that Biden is a great president, and he is a great president because of what he has done, what he has accomplished, not how he speaks.” (read more)