Chase Bank “glitch” is the new term for Check Fraud


Posted originally on Sep 5, 2024 By Hannah Jackson 

Chase Banj

Over the weekend, people have taken over a trend that had been going viral over writing fake checks to themselves and depositing it into their accounts by going to the ATM and taking out the allotted amount written on the checks. The check amounts would be for an obscene amount and the people would just keep withdrawing until the check would bounce. It started with a group of people making a video telling everyone to make a check out to themselves and go to the ATM and keep withdrawing and they would come up with thousands of dollars- a lot of people caught on to this and followed their lead.  The ones who followed this scheme shared videos of themselves actively going and doing this crime, proving to others that they should do it, too. Well.. they surely did out themselves for jail time.

This glitch is something that the bank programmer probably never anticipated. Normally, if someone were to write out a check to someone knowing that the check would bounce due to the amount of time it takes for a bank to catch it, which is usually 5-7 days since it must clear between two banks. Normally you would not withdraw that money until it clears. But going the route of just writing yourself the check within the same bank- that is something that a programmer just probably didn’t see coming since it does not need to clear from an outside bank. What people are failing to realize is this is downright bank fraud. This isn’t some “glitch” in a video game. How does one think they can go to the bank and deposit a fake check and come out with thousands of dollars? If you look up the term ‘bank fraud’ it specifically says it is the use of potentially illegal means to obtain money, assets, or other property owned or held by a financial institution. It blows my mind that people would believe that a bank would just give away “free” money without any repercussions. These people will be looking at jail time along with fines- not even including the money that they will have to pay back to these banks that they have stolen. Chase had fixed this problem within a few days of the discovery. A spokesperson from Chase said “We are aware of this incident, and it has been addressed. Regardless of what you see online, depositing a fraudulent check and withdrawing the funds from your account is fraud, plain and simple.”

Do people really believe the hype? Are they that gullible to think that they will get money for free from a bank? Money that they had to write a fake check in order to gain access to that money? It seems that people are just following the lines of trends without thinking of any backlashes or repercussions.

The First Ten Minutes – “The Illusion of Choice”


e Illusion of Choice”

Posted originally on the CTH on September 4, 2024 | Sundance

Watch the first 10 to 12 minutes.  Or watch more if you like, but from my position (having spent 15 years calling this out day-by-day as it takes place in real time) the first ten minutes are pretty cool to see being said eloquently and publicly.

Economist Eric Weinstein says he doesn’t know if Trump “will be allowed” to become president, says the goal of the World Order is to have two candidates who are both acceptable to them. “Democracy was the illusion of choice…” “You had two candidates that were both acceptable to the international order… We called that democracy. And so, democracy was the illusion of choice. That’s called magician’s choice.” “Magician’s choice in the primaries, and then you’d have the duopoly field, two candidates, either of which was acceptable, and you could actually afford to hold an election and the populace would vote.” “Donald Trump broke through the primary structure.” “They learned their lesson. You cannot afford to have candidates who are not acceptable to the international order.”

I disagree with the premise that Trump will not be allowed, because from my position I am watching the Deep State assemble insurance policies against a Trump victory actually taking place.  President Trump will be allowed to become president, but what happens from the election day forward is totally unknown.  WATCH:

CTH archives are full of the evidence for the “illusion of choice,” including the splitter strategy that Weinstein describes.  It’s the primary reason for our early and unwavering support of Donald J Trump.  There never has been any alternative.

Whistleblower Tells Senator Josh Hawley About Sketchy DHS Operations to Guard President Trump from Assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania


Posted originally on the CTH on September 4, 2024 | Sundance

This might be a point that many people do not want to hear, but if you have watched the granular world of politics – specifically how the tradecraft from the IC has evolved over the past 8 years – you might start to wonder what exactly a “whistleblower” is and who motivates them.

If the IC wanted to control information, perhaps an operative wearing the mask of a “whistleblower” would be a good vector for narrative engineering.  Nah, silly me, this is unlikely, right. Right?

I have no reason to doubt that a “whistleblower” communicated with Senator Josh Hawley; but given all of the stakes and players and considering that I cannot think of a single facet to any accountability that has ever come as a result of “whistleblowing,” sometimes I just wonder who vetts them.

The information can be true, and yet we can still not understand why the information appears.  To the smart set amid the group reading this, let me give you a memorable reference about true information that no one questioned, and that no one ever discussed.

Remember that Carter Page FISA application.  A Top-Secret Compartmented Intelligence (TSCI) document, a Title-1 national security document that never before in history was ever revealed by any agency in government; a document that would be the easiest to ever keep hidden because of its status; was made public.  Why did the DOJ release it?  The “information” delivered certainly wasn’t because of FOIA requests by the New York Times, CNN and Judicial Watch.   However, everyone was so happy to see a FISA application, no one ever asked “why are we seeing it?”  I digress…

According to Senator Josh Hawley a “whistleblower” is sharing how DHS officers were assigned to become Secret Service Agents for President Trump…. and that’s why mistakes were made.    WATCH:

Grossly incompetent “mistakes were made” is certainly better than the alternative, eh?

Catherine Englebrecht From True the Vote is Funding Livestream CCTV Cameras on Ballot Drop Boxes


Posted originally on the CTH on September 4, 2024 | Sundance 

In the information war era, the targeting mechanisms have moved away from content targeting to direct targeting of the voices who produce the content that is averse to the interests of the DC state.  This is where we see agencies like DHS and the FBI coming into the picture.

One of the first targets in this new era was Catherine Englebrecht of True The Vote.  Mrs. Englebrecht was targeted because her organization was essentially the first nation-wide effort focused on sanitizing the local voting rolls that generate voting ballots.  In the mail-in vote era where ballots are more valuable than actual people voting, the process of disqualifying ballots before they are printed is a problem for those who rely on fraudulent ballots existing.

Being relentless in their effort to find new and innovative ways to combat the ballot fraud, True The Vote is now partnering with willing Sheriff’s offices (the highest constitutional officer in every county).  The objective is to place CCTV Cameras on ballot drop boxes in the key areas where ballot fraud is most likely.  Catherine Englebrecht explains:

~ Visit True the Vote HERE ~

It’s not an end-all fix, and it certainly is only one component to combatting ballot fraud; however, the process of monitoring the inbound ballot delivery process is one part of a larger effort to stop/deter ballot fraud.

Election 2024 – Battleground Pennsylvania


Posted originally on the CTH on September 4, 2024 | Sundance

As you guys know, my current focus is research of the James Clyburn network of precinct level ballot scanner operations.  Previously we mapped the trip by Clyburn through Wisconsin (pre-Biden withdrawal). Next, we mapped the DNC/Clyburn travel through Michigan.  Currently we are looking deeply into Pennsylvania.

From what I can ascertain, the two regions where the Clyburn ballot operations [harvesting/scanning]in Pennsylvania seem focused are: (1) Philadelphia County (Philadelphia city and metro area) and Allegheny County (Pittsburgh city and metro area).  That’s it.  Those two areas are where most of the high velocity Democrat operations seem to be focused on Pennsylvania, Philly and Pittsburgh.

That being said, our ballot tracking research has hit an unexpected issue.  I am hearing reports on the ground about “regional” ballot printing operations where local (precinct level) mail-in ballots are being printed from software downloads.  I need help confirming information.

Normally I would not reach out until I could confirm or validate the details of what I am told.  However, on this issue I am against a timing deadline. The gist of what I am told, again – seeking to confirm this, is that a portion of potential mail-in-type ballots are not physically coming from the Secretary of States office, rather they are being printed locally.

If this is an accurate lead, localized printing may complicate the issue of address validation and challenges presented to local supervisors of elections as a result of fraudulent addresses (empty lots, Wal Marts, businesses, etc).  If precincts can print ballots, which are then later scanned, this could potentially be a vector for fraud.

My question is whether anyone has heard of this issue before? ….and/or does anyone have information about allowed ballot printing in any state where the printing of ballots has become very localized.  Who generates the voter registration rolls if absentee ballots are printed locally?

“I talked to two people today, Democrats who know the state very well. They both said that they thought Harris was not only behind in Pennsylvania, but they thought she was likely to lose the state.”

~ Mark Halperin

President Trump is holding a Townhall event in Pennsylvania today:

“Less than a week before Ms. Harris and Mr. Trump are set to meet on the debate stage, the race is shifting into high gear — with a particular focus on battleground states. Mr. Trump’s event in Pennsylvania, hosted by Sean Hannity, will air at 9 p.m. Eastern time on Fox News. Mr. Walz will spend a second day in Pennsylvania on Thursday, while Mr. Vance is set to continue campaigning in Arizona. Both states went to Mr. Trump in 2016, then to Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2020.”

.

“Her Mother Would’ve Slapped Her Around If She Came Home From School And Talked Like That”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 3, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Culture War


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 3, 2024 at 07:03 pm EST

Gold Star Mothers Describe Biden Mixing Up Their Names During Dignified Transfer


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 3, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Gold Star Mothers Describe The Agony Of Knowing Their Sons Were One Of The 13 That Died


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 3, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Gold Star Families Describe Feeling Anything But Joy Under Harris


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 3, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST