Jordan Peterson: Why is Marxism so Attractive?


Published on Nov 1, 2017

SUBSCRIBE 184K
Jordan B Peterson (born June 12, 1962) is a Canadian clinical psychologist and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. In this clip he talks about why Marxism is so attractive. Full talk, hosted by Dave Rubin @Clemons University, quoted under fair use: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP2Wl… You can support Dr. Peterson at his Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanbpeterson

 

The Basic Error of Marxism


Published on May 14, 2015

SUBSCRIBE 285
Why did Marxism fail in Russia and struggles everywhere else to survive?

 

The Consent of The Governed…


In a video spreading quickly on social media, a Seattle man is shown attempting to speak to the Seattle City Council. What comes next highlights how the ruling class view the electorate… WATCH:

My Unfair Lady…


AOC Denies Being a Puppet Candidate, She’s Not Being Entirely Truthful…

Amid growing revelations surrounding Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a puppet candidate, enlisted by a group of far-left activists, Ms. AOC tweets a firm denial.

(AOC Tweet – Handler Saikat Chakrabarti Tweet)

Unfortunately, the AOC denial breaks an Alinsky rule.  When a leftist breaks an Alinsky rule, the opposite of their claim is generally accurate; counter-intuitively affirming a stronger likelihood Representative AOC is actually steered by a group of leftists.

The evidence to support the puppet proposition is quite strong, albeit somewhat overblown in construct; and unfortunately for Ms. AOC, the evidence that does exist completely reconciles what is factually visible.  However, the issues are more nuanced that most are willing to admit.

Apparently Ms. AOC and her handler Saikat Chakrabarti are responding to a recently viral video put together by a Youtube personality called Mr. Reagan.  Many of you have likely viewed the video; for those who have not seen it, it is worth the time:

.

When you spend a lot of time deep in the granular weeds of politics, what Mr. Reagan is describing is not a conspiracy; in practice it is a well established fact.  The construct of recruiting political candidates for office is well known; the difference in modern politics is the type of candidate being recruited.

The video above is approximately 85% accurate.  Having spent time following the reaction of the progressive movement to the defeat of Hillary Clinton the thing Mr. Reagan gets wrong are some of the dates and the timeline.

The loss of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election exacerbated a pre-existing fracture inside the Democrat party.  The far-left Bernie Sanders wing became more angry with the establishment Hillary Clinton wing.  The reaction was not dissimilar to the same thing that happened in the Republican party in 2008 and 2009 that gave rise to the Tea Party.

Immediately following the 2016 election defeat, and with massive anger amid donors who had contributed billions to the campaign effort, the Clinton-Wing led by David Brock, went into damage control and organized a meeting with the intent on re-branding their efforts. [SEE HERE]  Meanwhile the more progressive wing, the group that actually has a larger grassroots following, decided upon a different course.  That’s where Cenk Uygur comes in.

In the 2018 race the DNC was forced to ride the progressive dragon.  Nancy Pelosi and the Clinton/Brock crowd knew their rise to regain political power would not be possible without the grassroots Bernie leftists.  The Cenk Uygur, Saikat Chakrabarti, recruitment was left alone to keep the fracture from becoming toxic.  The ideological issue of party leadership -vs- grassroots extremists still exists; we see the dynamic playing out daily.

Yes, into this foray the Saikat Chakrabarti (Bernie-wing) 2017 operation to recruit primary candidates to challenge the Pelosi/Clinton-wing was the dynamic that brought forth Ms. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  Take any recent college graduate who is interested in politics and has a reasonably attractive social profile and you can get an AOC.

This is what was immediately visible.  A political neophyte who only knows the catch-phrases from the educational indoctrination and social network.  This surfaces in an understanding of political issues, domestic and international, that is shallow and mostly lacking in substance and structure…  Cue the earliest audio visual.  Must Watch:

.

Now, having said that, seen that, and admitting the video which outlines the people controlling the politics of Ms. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is generally true, there’s a dismissive element by her detractors that is unfounded.   Most of her words are her own; it’s her ideas, and the formatting of those ideas into content, that are not her own.

No-one knows how over-her-head she is more than AOC.  She’s, politically not well versed in issues but she is not a stupid young lady.  It is obvious she is working her 29 year-old butt off to get herself up to speed.  She’s trying, and those who installed AOC; and are still providing the majority of her education, are also invested in making sure that AOC is not exposed as the recruited 2017 bar-tender.

When we were recruiting constitutional Tea Party candidates (2009) to challenge the vulnerable Blue-dogs and simultaneously primary the GOPe (establishment) Republicans in 2010, we did the same thing as Cenk Uygur, Saikat Chakrabarti.  The difference is that our candidates were more mature, already engaged in political granularity, older and skilled.

Our 2009 through 2011 grassroots Tea Party candidate pool was comprised of those who already established themselves in life and were mature professionals in various fields.  The 2017 progressive candidate pool for Uygur and Chakrabarti are recent college graduates and young folks fresh from the indoctrination machine.  To this college crowd Omnibus is public transportation that goes in all directions.

So yes, AOC was a recruited bartender turned into a congressional candidate and successfully installed as a congressional representative.  But don’t allow yourself to become dismissive of the internal success that was needed to achieve this result.

Remember, the people who attempted to destroy the Tea Party were the GOPe; specifically the Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell decepticon caucus. Sure the media were all-in to help them, but it was Boehner and McConnell who attacked the freshmen. Pelosi and Schumer saw the mistakes Boehner, Ryan, Cantor, and McConnell made with the dismissal of the Tea Party…. that’s why they now have President Donald Trump.

Do not expect Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to be as overt with their attacks against the young rebels within their progressive caucus.  Instead, look for Pelosi and Schumer to plan strategies to ‘use’ the movement.  If there is one thing Democrats excel at it’s strategy.

They have an ambitious, albeit politically naive, young lady who is intent on proving her individual merit and strength.  By disposition AOC will not be reliant upon the talking points and handlers forever.  Eventually Ms. AOC will form her own thoughts, speeches, congressional questioning and geopolitical opinions…. in short, she will become self-aware.

If the progressive movement is successful, by the time AOC fully matriculates she may find herself surrounded by a few hundred similarly recruited colleagues…. and just like the corrupt and rotten Paul Ryan who thrived throughout the rise of the Tea Party until he was faced with the sunlight of Trump, Speaker Pelosi ain’t stupid.

The New Electronic Pre-Screening is Still a Visa


QUESTION: You mentioned that the ROME WEC may be the last in Europe. If a VISA is required starting in 2021, does that effectively mean the political end for pro-immigration politicians in the EU? Seems to me the VISA requirement is incompatible with the entire notion of free movement across borders. Maybe the EU will be effectively dead by the time 2021 comes around?

TWE

ANSWER: Believe it or not, these people who create the regulations just want to know everything. Even when our staff flies these days, the question becomes do you transport any cash for your boss? I am not entirely sure that they are trying to stop the migrants or are they preparing for a cashless society? Nevertheless, this program is really a quasi-visa no matter what they claim. It could stop all immigration but they would never admit that.

You have to apply first for what they call “pre-screening,” so the difference is you cannot even get on the plane without pre-approval. Today, you can hop on a plane and receive the visa upon landing. That visa is generally good for 90 days. Free travel as it currently stands between the USA and Europe is without pre-visa applications. They are calling this new process “pre-screening,” so it is a digital visa where you have to be cleared before you can get on a plane.

Even when I land in the USA and go to one of those machines, it already knows the flight I came in on. The information manifested is transmitted to the USA and they too know who is arriving on the plane. Therefore, they do not call this a “visa,” but in reality, it very much is where you must apply for one before getting on the plane to China or Russia. The freedom of travel is coming to an end. They will know everyone and every plane.

I was flying to Paris. I had a one-way ticket because I was then flying to Switzerland and off to Athens. I would return from Athens to JFK in New York. I had to buy a first-class refundable round-trip ticket to Paris to get into the country, for they required a round-trip ticket. Once in, I had to cancel the ticket to go on from there. This was a stupid requirement based upon an assumption that I would go to Paris and just stay. When dealing with governments, there is never any common sense.

Why We Are Losing to Political Islam


Published on Mar 15, 2019

SUBSCRIBE 47K
We need to stop and understand that we are losing and why we are losing. If you like my channel, click the notification bell. Sign up for Bill Warner’s newsletter at http://www.politicalislam.com Buy Bill’s books at: http://www.politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerau… Twitter: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://www.minds.com/PoliticalIslam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656 Minds: https://www.minds.com/PoliticalIslam Gab: https://gab.ai/PoliticalIslam FreeZoxee: https://friends.freezoxee.com/politic…

 

UPDATE: Grand Jury Returns Federal Terrorism Indictment for New Mexico Terror Compound Suspects…


(DOJ-NSD ) A federal grand jury sitting in Albuquerque, New Mexico returned a superseding indictment on March 13 charging Jany Leveille, 36, Siraj Ibn Wahhaj, 40, Hujrah Wahhaj, 38, Subhanah Wahhaj, 36, and Lucas Morton, 41, with federal offenses related to terrorism, kidnapping and firearms violations.

All of the defendants are currently in custody awaiting trial.

The announcement was made by Assistant Attorney General John C. Demers for the National Security Division, U.S. Attorney John C. Anderson for the District of New Mexico, Assistant Director Michael McGarrity of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division and Special Agent in Charge James Langenberg of the FBI’s Albuquerque Field Office.

These defendants were previously charged by indictment on Sept. 11, 2018, with a conspiracy relating to the possession of firearms and ammunition by an alien illegally and unlawfully in the United States.  The original indictment also charged Leveille with possessing firearms and ammunition as an alien illegally and unlawfully in the United States.

The superseding indictment charges all of the defendants with participating in a conspiracy from October 2017 to August 2018 to provide material support and resources, including currency, training, weapons, and personnel, knowing and intending that they were to be used in preparation for and in carrying out attacks to kill officers and employees of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339A.

“The indictment alleges that the defendants conspired to provide material support in preparation for violent attacks against federal law enforcement officers and members of the military,” said Assistant Attorney General Demers.  “Advancing beliefs through terror and violence has no place in America, and the National Security Division continues to make protecting against terrorism its top priority.”

“The superseding indictment alleges a conspiracy to stage deadly attacks on American soil,” said U.S. Attorney John C. Anderson.  “These allegations remind us of the dangers of terrorism that continue to confront our nation, and the allegation concerning the death of a young child only underscores the importance of prompt and effective intervention by law enforcement.  I commend the FBI, DHS, ATF, Taos County Sheriff’s Office, and the Eighth Judicial District Attorney’s Office for their ongoing diligence and outstanding work in identifying and disabling imminent threats of targeted violence. ” 

“The defendants in this case allegedly were preparing for deadly attacks and their targets included law enforcement and military personnel, the very people who are committed to protecting all of us,” said Assistant Director McGarrity.  “We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to uncover and put a stop to acts of terrorism.”

As alleged in the superseding indictment, these defendants conspired to provide material support in preparation for violent attacks against officers and employees of the United States. According to the superseding indictment, Siraj Ibn Wahhaj and Hujrah Wahhaj gathered firearms and ammunition, and all of the defendants transported people, firearms, and ammunition across state lines and constructed a training compound where they stored firearms and ammunition. The superseding indictment further alleges that Siraj Ibn Wahhaj and Morton constructed and maintained a firing range at the compound where they engaged in firearms and tactical training for other compound occupants, and that Leveille and Morton attempted to recruit others to their cause. (read more)

Red Yenta! Socialist Dating App Helps Slackers of the World Unite


Published on Mar 11, 2019

SUBSCRIBED 121K

Hot new dating app, Red Yenta, pairs idealistic socialists to fight “non-consensual power dynamics,” and perhaps for a cuddle and a peck on the cheek. Slackers of the world unite! Will this business of bringing together passionate anti-capitalists raise a mountain of venture capital, or will the hyper-political pitch raise red flags for investors? Right Angle is a production of the members at http://BillWhittle.com

Coming Soon to a City Near You, Scharia Police


One American News Network [OANN] is a very good source for the issues facing our nation from a conservative prospective. You won’t see the following on ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC or CNN. Haven’t seen it on Fox News either.

Victor Davis Hanson Discusses Pelosi Cancelling the State of the Union


Published on Jan 24, 2019

SUBSCRIBE 58K
Victor Davis Hanson on The Laura Ingraham Podcast (1/24/2019) 📲 Sponsor me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ConservativeC…