Left Stays Silent After Attack on Pregnant Tesla Driver


Posted originally on Apr 14, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

LeftistViolence

The violence against Tesla owners has gone too far. Left-leaning politicians have done nothing to stop the ongoing attacks by deranged individuals who believe they are “activists.” Nazi swastikas are appearing on Teslas throughout the world, while other vehicles are being set on fire. Now, these psychopaths have resorted to attacking people while driving.

pregnant woman in Vancouver was driving a Tesla when a large rock shattered her front windshield. The rock was thrown so hard that it went through the windshield and hit the pregnant woman. “We are working to determine whether this was a criminal act, and if someone intentionally targeted this Tesla,” said Vancouver police spokesman Sgt. Steve Addison. “This very serious incident could easily have resulted in someone’s death, but for a few inches.” There have been over 28 attacks on Teslas in Vancouver alone since Trump took office on January 20.

The woman was taken to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Police declared that she and her unborn baby, a life not recognized by the left, could have died as a result of the attack. Other drivers on the road could have been injured. What more will it take for politicians on the left to WAKE UP and DEMAND A STOP TO THE VIOLENCE!

Instead of condoning the violence, politicians are asking the people to raise hell to mislead the world into believing that the people do not support Donald Trump or those in his administration like Elon Musk. No politician on the left will declare these attacks an act of terrorism. Yet, bomb squads have been called to homes and businesses. Fire departments have been on high alert. There have even been cases of gunshots fired into office buildings.

Pelosi Schumer Black Lives

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) spent years condemning January 6. She accused Trump of stoking continued violence” and enticing a terrorist mob into a “violent assault” that left her with “physical scars and emotional trauma.” Yet, as we know from her own daughter’s documentary, Pelosi herself called off the National Guard that day to encourage the riot.

A reporter recently asked Pelosi to comment on the Tesla attacks.  “I’m so sorry, I’m a little bit late here right now,” was her only reply. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) also refused to provide a comment to reporters that day, but later issued a statement on his website to condemn the victims. “There are legitimate ways in a civilized society to express strong disagreement with far-right extremists who are trying to dismantle the American way of life. Violence is never acceptable,” Jeffries wrote.

rioters_tipped_car_300_clr_12700

Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) has refused to call the attacks “violent.” Bernie Sanders is perhaps the only Democrat to call the attacks violent, but refuses to declare them acts of terrorism. “I don’t know what domestic terrorism is in this context. It’s outrageous. People have the right to protest [Elon] Musk and Tesla, but no one should engage in violence, period,” Sanders said. “Boycotts are common, but violence must cease. It should not be part of our national dialogue.”

The Oxford Dictionary states “terrorism” is defined as “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.”

In Canada where the aforementioned incident occurred, terrorism is defined as the following:

“In Canada, section 83.01 of the Criminal Code defines terrorism as an act committed "in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause" with the intention of intimidating the public "…with regard to its security, including its economic security, or compelling a person, a government or a domestic or an international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act."

The US FBI defines terrorism as:

“Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.”

The ongoing viciousness toward Tesla owners are TERRORISM by every definition—politically motivated acts of violence.

Tom Fitton: “Trump Was Almost Jailed During The Trump Administration.”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 12, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

BREAKING: Tom Fitton Sues Trump AG Over Epstein Record Release


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 12, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

Wisconsin Teen Allegedly Murdered Parents in Deranged Plot to Assassinate Trump


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Apr 12, 2025 at 11:00 pm EST

Debased Democrats Cheer MS13 Gangbanger’s Return to US Soil


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Apr 12, 2025 at 1:00 pm EST

The Process Matters When Confronting the Deep State


Posted originally on CTH on April 12, 2025 | Sundance

Regarding the recently released Russiagate files. Again, emphasizing that process matters, let me explain how and why we are being purposefully misled, even with Trump ‘allies’ in control of various govt agencies (silos).

Using the reference of the James Wolfe storyline, let me outline how process matters and how you can tell when the process is being used to coverup corrupt activity in Washington DC.

Former Senate Intelligence Community Security Chief, James Wolfe, leaked the Carter Page FISA application to journalist Ali Watkins. We know from the DOJ indictment of James Wolfe [SEE HERE], a very specific set of evidence and key dates that was assembled against him.

James Wolfe was nailed for lying to FBI investigators about his leaks to Ali Watkins on December 15, 2017.  That is the date of the second interview with Wolfe.  During the third interview a few days later, Wolfe was shown the evidence against him, and he admitted his lies.  However, his indictment was not unsealed until June 7, 2018.

Key Dates: Busted for guilt December 15, 2017.  Indicted June 7, 2018.

♦ The evidence against Wolfe included text messages between Senate Intel Vice-Chairman Mark Warner, and the lawyer for Oleg Deripaska, an attorney named Adam Waldman. The text messages were made public on Feb 8, 2018, [SOURCE] four months before Wolfe was indicted.

♦ The evidence against Wolfe included text messages between Wolfe and journalist Ali Watkins.  Ms Watkins was notified of her phone records being seized by FBI investigators on February 13, 2018, [SOURCE] again four months before Wolfe was indicted.

Why was this evidence, all of which would have been useful at trial, purposefully released by the Mueller investigation who was in charge of everything related to Russiagate at the time.

Shortly after James Wolfe was indicted, the Title-1 FISA application he leaked was then released to the public under the auspices of a FOIA request.  Wolfe indicted June 7, 2018, the FISA application released publicly July 21, 2018 [SOURCE].

RIGHT QUESTION:  Why was the evidence against James Wolfe being released to the public between the time the case was made (Dec ’17) and the time the indictment was unsealed (June ’18)?  Why wasn’t the evidence held until criminal trial processes began?

ANSWER: In hindsight we discover the Mueller team were in charge of the timeline because the Russiagate investigation superseded all other Main Justice outcomes and consequences.  The Mueller team were protecting the participants (Ali Watkins, Mark Warner, James Wolfe etc.), who all knew they were being investigated as a result of the Wolfe leak.

All of these players, including the media who received the FISA application from the Wolfe leak, knew they were tangentially and directly connected to the Wolfe investigation.  After Wolfe made his admission (December ’17), all of the collateral players knew they were at risk.

The FBI was notifying all stakeholders of the Wolfe admission, and Mueller’s team was helping to mitigate the consequences to those stakeholders.  How?  With controlled public releases of information.

Each of the corrupt actors had weeks, some even months, to hire lawyers, obfuscate the evidence of their involvement and formulate their defenses.  That’s why the information was being “released.”

The biggest single example of controlling damage and public opinion through the selective release of information was also the most brutally obvious, the July 21, 2018, release of the Carter Page FISA itself.

This was a Top-Secret Compartmented Intelligence document (TSCI). Directly related to a national security matter, and directly related to an ongoing investigation, and directly a component of the largest leak of top-secret classified information in decades.

The FISA itself was the easiest of all documents for the DOJ, FBI and National Security Apparatus to keep hidden from public view.  There was no court in America who would have ordered it to be released.  Quite simply, there was no reason for the DOJ to even consider releasing it; yet they did.

The Title-1 FISA application was released by Main Justice under the ridiculous justification of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) release.  Name me another TSCI document in the history of the Intelligence Community, that has ever been released under a FOIA (either before, or since); there simply isn’t another example.  Yet in the rush to review it, no one ever drew attention to this brutally obvious point.

The FISA was released shortly after James Wolfe was indicted, because everyone in the background network of the James Wolfe indictment, mainly the DOJ under Mueller team control, was operating to control information adverse to their interests.  The public release watered down the jaw-dropping leak itself.

[SOURCE]

Why visit this example again?  Because we are seeing a repeat of this pattern in the recently released Russiagate files.

If DC can frame negative information as politically motivated, DC can then avoid the unlawful and illegal activity underneath the information.  That is exactly what is happening, and that is why process is important.

If the bad actors in the silos want to remove the concern about illegal activity, they control release the information framing it as political in nature.

…”if the DOJ can claim evidence is political, it then nullifies the evidence and ends the case. This is why SD is pissed they handed this to that [willing] idiot Solomon.”…

SOLOMON: NSA Director Told FBI Pulitzer-Winning WaPo Story On Russian Collusion Hoax Was ‘Wrong’


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 11, 2025, at 10:00 pm EST

BT⚡️TV-17: Joe Allen – Has The Singularity Already Happened?


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 10, 2025, at 9:00 pm EST

“Steve Jensen’s Hands Are Dirty On Jan 6th” Julie Kelly On Controversial FBI Promotion


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 10, 2025, at 8:00 pm EST

KELLY: Judge Boasberg’s ‘Coincidental’ Contempt Timeline


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 10, 2025, at 8:00 pm EST