The Lessons of the 2020 Election


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted Nov 4, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The election is still not decided, but there are MAJOR lessons to emerge.

LESSON #1

Hillary outspent Trump in 2016 and lost. Bloomberg pouring over $100 million into Florida to defeat Trump and lost. The Democrats poured money in from around the country and spent $104 million to defeat Lyndsey Grahm and lost. The same story is appearing from around the country. The lesson to be learned:

Money cannot buy Love nor Elections!

LESSON #2

The pollsters are biased and are worthless. They claimed this was going to be a Blue Sweep and they would take the Senate, gain seats in the House, and storm the White House. The Democrats lost seats in the House and failed to take the Senate. And as for the White House, this is precisely as Socrates forecast – it would be a very close election neck & neck. They are ALWAYS wrong. They claimed Biden would take Florida and Trump won by a huge margin. South Carolina, they claimed Lydnsey Grahm would be defeated because he supported Trump and he not only won, but Trump won that state by a 14% margin.

Pollsters are Propaganda Agents Trying to Manipulate the Public

In our Special Report on the elections, we provided all the models out for years ahead. When it came to 2020, we warned that the first four models which were unanimous for Trump in 2016, were skewed 3:1 in favor of Biden this time in 2020. We showed the first 6 models and wrote:

“What we are showing overall is a much tighter race than perhaps the polls suggest putting Biden 12% ahead.”

You can see why our political reports are more reliable than polls and have long been subscribed to by political forces around the world. We do not canvas opinions and they do not reflect my personal opinion. That is simply not the way to forecast anything. This drives home the point that pollsters are simply now biased and being paid to put out fake projections in an effort to steer votes. They did that in Britain with the BREXIT vote where Socrates was again correct and all the pollsters were wrong.

We do not need to call people to ask: By the way, do you hate Trump as we do? The numbers are the number no different than markets because forecasting markets and the economy is really forecasting human nature and what they will do next. It is all the same to Socrates. Of course, mainstream media will NEVER report what Socrates does, because it is against their own agenda. The day he any of the mainstream media ever report on the success of Socrates will show there must be a major shake-up in management. They are no more reliable than pollsters anymore.

Why Smart Money will Sell Stocks in Front of a Biden Victory Because of Taxes


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted Nov 3, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

A Biden victory or even a continued round of uncertainty into early December may set off a serious liquidation before year-end. The risk of a significant tax increase next year under the Democrats would warn that you better take whatever capital gains you have this year. Some state like California has extended their ballot counting to 17 days past election day. We are looking at simply uncertainly in many respects. In a tight election and so many aspects up in the air, we can easily see this election end up in the US Supreme Court.

While some try to pretend that the market will rally under Biden, that is very unlikely with significant tax increases both on investors and corporations. A Biden victory may follow the traditional 2-year decline into 2022 which follows an 11 years rally. A decline in the market in the midst of uncertainty cannot be ruled out simply because it would be prudent to sell in 2020 before even a possible Democratic victory which unfolds with a 2021 economic seachange.

The Insanity of This Election


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted Nov 3, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The Democrats have turned up the hatred against Republicans to new heights. They are demonizing Trump and constantly alleging he was falsely elected, and they are certain to do the same this time around. They have divided the country deeply and Trump has failed to drain the swamp. Glen Greenwald has come out and stated that the CIA was trying to overthrow Trump. There is so much internal division within the bureaucracy that a Trump victory will be by no means harmonious. He will face internal efforts as a coup continues, and 2022 does not look like a very good year.

Make no mistake about it; REGARDLESS of who wins the election, the other side will NOT accept a loss. The Democrats have been trying desperately to join this Western Coup of the Great Reset, and this is why they are funded by Soros and inspired by Bill Gates. There is no way they will simply sit on their hands. Soros will probably not even be alive for the next election in 2024. Bill Gates will be unless someone assassinates him as they at least tried with Adolf Hitler.

We are by no means heading back to the way things were. Europe is adopting the Great Reset 120%. They are banning short-term air flights and are basically banning chemicals in food production, which will only complete our model. We are looking at food shortages and famine on a global scale. Famine is already beginning in Africa, and this may simply be part of this diabolical plan against humanity to reduce the population.

Trump will stand up against this trend, but he also has so many within the government plotting to stab him in the back. Ballots are vanishing; people are discovering they voted when they did not. I have never seen any election in history this corrupt. No wonder gun sales are at record highs and ammunition is nowhere to be found. Either way, we will see violence post-election, so batten down the hatches.

We are Getting Reports of a Terrorist Attack in Vienna – No details as of Yet


Armstrong Economics Blog/Civil Unrest Re-Posted Nov 2, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Greenwald Forced to Resign as the Intercept Protects Biden Censoring all Hunter Biden


Armstrong Economics Blog/Press Re-Posted Oct 29, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

I seriously think there is no human being who could have honestly forecast that this election would be the most corrupt election in American history years in advance. What is going on is far beyond what I think anyone would have ever imagined. If you wrote a book outlining this, it would have been rejected by any editor as not even believable.

Now Glen Greenwald has resigned from the Intercept which would not allow him to publish articles on the Hunter Biden scandal. It was Greenwald who literally risked his life to publish the Edward Snowden material. Under this censorship today, neither the Snowden nor even Watergate would be permitted to be published.

Greenwald wrote:

“The same trends of repression, censorship and ideological homogeneity plaguing the national press generally have engulfed the media outlet I co-founded, culminating in censorship of my own articles.”

Democrats have Always been Against the Catholics


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted Oct 19, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Biden’s Bodyguards


This has got to Stop or we have Lost our Country

Hard core tyranny has arrived in the United States. Thanks to the coup-minded Democrats, it has been creeping up on us after Trump was elected president. Now we have full-on Chinese-style stifling of free speech. Congress and the Deep State Swamp are complicit and have done nothing to protect our First Amendment.

Try using Google to find a story deemed ‘politically incorrect’ by the Swamp. You will be redirected to their own narrative that they deem factual. It’s the same with science. You are only allowed to know the data from the scientists of their choosing. Facebook won’t allow anything else to be posted on their platform.

Twitter has banned the New York Post after that publication revealed smoking gun details of Hunter Biden’s Ukraine graft involving his father. Censoring real journalism is a disgrace.

All speech should be free. People are allowed to express hatred. Dirty books should be allowed to be sold at smut shops. But political speech is the most important. It’s paramount and yet it’s going away on social media, aided and abetted by our own government and tax dollars. The CIA helped Facebook get started. They worked with Zuckerberg because they knew such a platform would provide them with a honeypot of private information. The CIA has gone rogue. It has been corrupted (perhaps inevitably) by power-mad operatives just as those running the FBI are corrupt. Now our social media has succumbed to the same kind of tyranny.

Don’t like it? Start your own Facebook. Or Twitter. Or Google. That’s what we’re told, anyway. Most of us do not have a few billion dollars handy to do it. We may as well be told to start our own CIA or FBI. Why not start our own Federal Reserve? The other independent social media platforms that have tried to offer free speech will eventually succumb to tyrannical control. They will be bought out, shut down, or sued into bankruptcy.

We live in a new, high-tech age and social media have become our town square. It shouldn’t be turned into ‘Red Square” by the globo-socialists.

—Ben Garrison

1619–The Left’s final assault on America!


Their 1619 Project would eviscerate, denigrate and replace American history with racist lies allowing them to form a new Government!

Scot Faulkner image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Scot Faulkner —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 13, 2020

1619--The Left's final assault on AmericaLeftists have launched what they hope can be their final assault on America. Their goal is to obliterate everything good that America ever did or aspired to achieve, erase its citizens’ memories, and sow the seeds for future generations to revile and reject everything that is decent and noble in our country.

They intend to fundamentally change America’s historical narrative away from events and circumstances that made our country the world’s beacon of hope for freedom and representative government. They intend to replace well-documented reality with a false narrative of America being the scourge of the world, based on its enslaving and stealing from minorities to enrich and aggrandize white ruling elites. 

American Flag, Pledge of Allegiance and National Anthem as offensive vestiges of racism, slavery and white privilege

Their plan is called the “1619 Project,” an alternative history curriculum for American elementary and secondary students. It was announced in July 2019 with a series of front-page stories in the New York Times, and other major newspapers, explaining its content and the need to: “reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding, and placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story we tell ourselves about who we are.”

The 1619 premise is: “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written.”  Everything that happened in American history flows from the “original sin” of slavery. Every concept, document and institution that shapes and guides America was actually designed to promote slavery and therefore must be eradicated to atone for centuries of racial oppression.

1619 proponents declare that we must “make amends” for America’s crimes against humanity by eliminating monuments, the Electoral College, the Senate, Supreme Court justices, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, federalism, capitalism, and all vestiges of white history and culture. Even hard work, objective thinking, the scientific method, self-reliance, being polite and two-parent families are the product of racism and “white dominant culture,” according to a document that has since been removed from the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture. 

The 1619 Project is partnering with those who deem the American Flag, Pledge of Allegiance and National Anthem as offensive vestiges of racism, slavery and white privilege.https://lockerdome.com

The centerpiece of the 1619 Project is the false claim that slavery was a uniquely American crime

We could ignore the 1619 Project if it were simply the ravings of a coddled leftist professor in some Ivy League sinecure. But it is not, or at least it is no longer. 

The New York Times leads an array of news media, academic, think tank and public officials who see the 1619 Project as the final solution for turning America against itself. Once they indoctrinate the current generation of elementary and secondary school students with (even greater) hatred for America, drowning out and canceling dissenting voices with charges of racism and white privilege, they will have free rein to establish a permanent totalitarian socialist state.

The 1619 Project was embraced by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, when she led members of the Congressional Black Caucus to Ghana during the August Recess. They wanted the 1619 narrative of the first African slaves arriving at Jamestown to upstage commemorations of the first session of an elected government at Jamestown. To succeed, the 1619 Project must ignore mountains of facts, and fabricate mountains of lies.

The centerpiece of the 1619 Project is the false claim that slavery was a uniquely American crime, infecting everything and everybody it touched to the present day.

In reality, the capture and enslavement of defeated foes and “inferior” people is as old as humankind. Slavery was integral to establishing regional dominance for the Egyptian Pharaohs, Muslim Emirs, Roman Emperors and countless other rulers. The Western Hemisphere’s great civilizations of the Mayans, Incas and Aztecs enslaved their subjugated people for labor and ritual sacrifice. 


African rulers trading their slaves to Muslims or other Africans, and then to Europeans, was born from improved sailing technologies and the need for cheap, forced labor. The 1619 Project ignores the fact that only 9.7% of the Atlantic slave trade involved England’s North American colonies; 90.3% of African slaves were shipped to South America and the Caribbean.

Robert Woodson, who founded the 1776 Project to combat 1619 falsehoods

The 1619 Project ignores that while 12 million West Africans were shipped by Europeans to the Americas, over 17 million East Africans were shipped by Arabs into the Middle East. The 1619 Project ignores the fact that the American colonies began banning slave importation in 1778, during the Revolutionary War, leading to a formal (largely ignored) ban for the entire United States in 1794. 

England did not ban slavery in its colonies until 1807. Meanwhile, the Arab slave trade in East Africa was not eradicated until England destroyed the last slave forts in Zanzibar in 1909. Slavery remains active, if officially banned, in much of the Arab world today—as well as in parts of Africa, in the Chinese and Russian penal systems, and in China-run mines in Congo, where 40,000 children labor for $1-2 a day. 

The year 1619 is important, not because slaves arrived in the new world, but because for the first time in the Western Hemisphere, a free people elected representatives to govern and be held accountable in subsequent elections. This was the first step to America becoming the most exceptional civic culture in world history. That is the true 1619 lesson that leftists want to expunge. 

The Left and New York Times would also have us believe that black Americans are in lockstep with Nikole Hanna-Jones and other authors of the divisive, revisionist 1619 pseudo-history. The claim helps drive their anti-American agenda. But it is false. . 

Many African Americans have battled 1619 fabrications and assertions, while black American thought leaders have eviscerated it—including civil rights leader Robert Woodson, who founded the 1776 Project to combat 1619 falsehoods, because he objects to assertions that the “shadow of slavery and Jim Crow” hangs over the destiny of Black Americans. “Nothing is more lethal,” he says, “than to convey to people that they have an exemption from personal responsibility.”

Eminent historians have also excoriated the phony 1619 history

Wall Street Journal editorial board member Jason Riley notes that the NY Times 1619 scheme is also a foundation of “critical race theory,” which insists that problems within the black community are the fault of whites and the responsibility of whites to solve. It is now being taught in colleges, high schools, middle schools and even elementary schools across the USA—and in companies and government agencies via “diversity” and “racial sensitivity” sessions, where “diversity consultants” tell attendees the US is inherently racist and “virtually all white people” contribute to or benefit from racism. 

Other vocal black critics of the 1619 Project and its adherents include political commentators Armstrong Williams and Candace Owens. Incredibly, notes columnist Deroy Murdock, the NY Times own family history is “rife with slavery, Confederate boosterism, and enforcement of Jim Crow segregation.” 

Eminent historians have also excoriated the phony 1619 history, and Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) has drafted a bill that would cut funding to schools teaching this fake American history.

Sadly and outrageously, all too many academics, Democrats, race hustlers and even some Republicans are vigorously advancing destructive 1619 ideas. Others are too intimidated to speak out against them, out of fear that they will be ridiculed, fired, canceled, harassed online or in restaurants, even beaten or killed. 

Americans must do all they can to stop the 1619 Project and stand-up for the greatest nation on earth, before it’s too late. Bob Woodson’s 1776 Project is a good start. Let’s build on it, starting right now. 

Democrats Want To Amend the US Constitution


Armstrong Economics Blog/Rule of Law Re-Posted Oct 13, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

It is very interesting how the Democrats are introducing a Constitutional Amendment to create a body that will remove a president because of his inability to fulfill the office. Nancy Pelosi clearly states that this has nothing to do with President Trump. Indeed, it could not be for an Amendment to the Constitution requires state ratification. There is no way this could be passed in such a short order to impact Trump.

Introducing this legislation regarding the MENTAL CAPACITY of a president is obviously intended to impact the next president, who they expect will be Biden. This is a further sign that they do in fact know there is a problem with Biden that may get far worse since he is 77 years old now and would be unlikely that he could ever do two terms.

Senator Josh Hawley Calls Out Democrats for Religious Litmus Tests and Bigotry on Judicial Nominees…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 12, 2020 by sundance

Article six of the constitution, and the first amendment outlining the bill of rights within the United States constitution, affirms that every American citizen has the unassailable right to practice their religion in accordance with their own beliefs; no litmus tests are permitted. However, under the doctrines of Marxism religion is a threat to state control.

Modern Democrats are Marxists. In a push-back to the preferred doctrine of modern democrats U.S. Senator Josh Hawley gives a passionate opening remark during the senate committee hearing for Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett.