Everything Obama did was a failure — so one wonders was he that incompetent or was it intentional?
Tag Archives: Feminazis
Yahoo hit by biggest hack ever (again), 1 billion accounts affected
Get use to it they will all be hacked at some point and the NSA has everything to email any way and they will get hacked at some point as well.
Newt Gingrich: Turning The “Trump Rally” Movement Into The “Trump Reality” Presidency…
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich delivers an exceptional presentation to the Heritage Foundation discussing “Trumpism”. In typical Gingrich form he rips his way through the his…
Source: Newt Gingrich: Turning The “Trump Rally” Movement Into The “Trump Reality” Presidency…
“Bullet In The Mouth” – Trump Electors Flooded With Death Threats
Electors around the country are being harassed with a barrage of emails, phone calls, letters and even death threats, in an effort to block Donald Trump from being voted in as president by the Electoral College on Monday. Of course, with the mainstream media and democrats pushing the dangerous narrative that Putin basically usurped our democracy, it’s no wonder that disaffected Hillary snowflakes are growing more “triggered” with each passing day.
According to a report from the New York Post, one Republican elector in Michigan has even received death threats after he refused to change his vote.
For Michael Banerian, a senior at Oakland University in Michigan and a Republican elector, the harassment comes with a dark side.He said he’s been getting death threats via email, snail mail, Twitter and Facebook.
“Somebody threatened to put a bullet in the back of my mouth,” Banerian, 22, told The Post on Wednesday.
Republican electors from all over the country are being inundated with emails, phone calls and letters on a daily basis, from angry democrats, urging them to switch their votes. One Republican elector in Arizona estimated that she had received 50,000 emails since election day.
The bullying is overwhelming Sharon Geise’s tech devices, but not her resolve to support Trump.The Mesa, Arizona, grandmother woke up Wednesday morning to more than 1,500 emails demanding she not carry out her legal duty to vote for the president-elect.
“They just keep coming and coming,” Geise told The Post, estimating she’s received more than 50,000 emails since the election. “They’re overpowering my iPad.”
Her answer: mass delete.
Despite the avalanche, she said, her decision to back Trump is stronger than ever.
“Obviously their minds are made up and they’re not going to change. I’m not either,” the soft-spoken Geise said.
Like Geise, Republican Patricia Allen of Tennessee told The Post she’s been bombarded with 2,000 emails, 120 letters and five phone calls all urging her to switch and vote against Trump. But Allen, 74, said that despite the “siege,” she’s not budging.“This has never happened before … Do you know how long it takes to delete all those emails every day?” she asked.
She’s also been solicited by a Harvard University group backed by constitutional law Prof. Lawrence Lessig, who has offered free legal aid to electors who change their vote.
“That borders on bribery,” said Allen. “Carried to this extreme, the day might come when an elector could be sold to the highest bidder.”
It’s simply amazing that more than a month has passed since election day and disaffected Hillary supporters still can’t come to terms with the fact that, to quote Joe Scarborough, “Hillary Clinton lost Hillary Clinton the election.”
Why The Democrats Can’t Let Go Of Losing
Submitted by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,
The Democratic Party has become everything it once was against.
Let’s get one thing straight right at the start: criticizing the Democratic Party and its ruling elites is not the same as “supporting Trump.”
The either-or accusation is a classic propaganda technique to silence dissent. During the Vietnam War, for example, anyone dissenting against the official narratives supporting the war was accused of “supporting the Communists.” In other words, criticizing the Powers That Be or their narrative is treason.
This either-or choice was designed to silence dissent by eliminating the possibility that domestic critics had valid reasons to disagree with the war that had nothing to do with Communism and everything to do with America.
Now we hear the same propaganda technique being wielded by Democrats: any criticism of the Democratic Party is “supporting Trump.”
Hogwash. Any institution that can’t accept achingly obvious critiques is doomed. Resilient, confident people and organizations welcome fair criticism, as honest criticism (i.e. intended to improve performance and understanding) is essential to the process of successful adaptation to changing conditions.
So now that we’ve got that straightened out–criticism isn’t necessarily support for “the other side,” it stands or falls on its own merits–let’s nail down why the Democratic Party didn’t live up to expectations in the election.
And we’re not talking about the presidential race, in which the Democrats scored a substantial advantage in the popular vote–we’re talking to the entire election results: state legislatures, the House of Representatives and the Senate.
The Democrats picked up two senate seats and eight in the House, three of which were vacant. Democrats lost the majority in the Senate in 2014 and in the House in 2010, so the the 2016 election was a continuation of a trend begun six years ago.
United States Congress elections, 2016
Why has the nation turned away from the Democratic Party? Perhaps one reason is that the Democratic Party has become everything it once was against.
George McGovern’s 1972 campaign slogan was Come home, America. The current version of the Democratic Party never met a globalist treaty or agenda that it didn’t approve.
The Democratic Party turned anti-war after Lyndon Johnson’s withdrawal from the 1968 race; the current version of the Democratic Party has embraced endless war via proxies, drones and Special Forces–they support interventions and unlimited violence in other nations, as long as American combat deaths are few and far between.
In years past, the Democratic Party presented itself as the party of “the working people” against the business interests of banks and corporations. The current version of the Democratic Party has embraced big banks, financiers, billionaires and corporations, cozying up to Big Money for hundreds of millions in campaign contributions and Super-PAC funding.
Former President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary earned $230 million between 2001 (when they left the White House) and 2015. How The Clintons Have Made $230 Million Since Leaving The White House (Forbes). Their foundation has collected some $2 billion, and the foundation’s track record of large donations from non-U.S. players and its modest charitable effectiveness has opened questions about pay-for-play.
As for supporting “the working people”–Hillary’s comment about “deplorables” summed up the unspoken view of the Democratic Party elites.
The Democratic Party has become everything that it once loathed: elitist, globalist, interventionist, self-serving, warmongering and overflowing with hubris.
To avoid looking at their reflection honestly, humans project their own failures and destructive traits onto others, blaming others for their own faults. They justify their self-serving actions, and deny responsibility for their clearly self-destructive behaviors.
This describes the Democratic Party elites to a T. It’s all Trump’s fault, or the Russian hackers, or the “deplorables”–anyone but themselves.
Not that long ago, the Republican Party was being dragged toward a shallow grave — a party drained of ideas and ideals. Trump’s campaign bypassed the Republican Party’s self-serving, hubris-soaked elites, and whether the party will survive the internecine warfare between the Trump camp and the Old Guard remains an open question.
If the Democratic Party clings to elitism, indignation, denial and self-justification, it will be digging its own shallow grave beside the one awaiting the Republican Party should it fail to embrace practical, affordable solutions to the stagnation of opportunity and rising inequality.
Trump: “If Russia Was Hacking, Why Did White House Only Complain After Hillary Lost?”
With the nation gripped by the thoroughly unsubstantiated “Russian hacking” scandal, which last night escalated to include Putin himself according to an NBC report which provided nothing new, Trump threw himself in the fray on Thursday morning when he raised more questions on Twitter about Russia’s reported role in cyber attacks on U.S. political parties and individuals as well as the timing of the White House’s response under President Barack Obama.
“If Russia, or some other entity, was hacking, why did the White House wait so long to act? Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?” Trump wrote in a post on Twitter.
If Russia, or some other entity, was hacking, why did the White House wait so long to act? Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 15, 2016
Trump has repeatedly dismissed reports over the Russian hacking as “ridiculous,” and accused Democrats are upset that Trump won the Nov. 8 presidential election over their candidate, Hillary Clinton. In October, the U.S. government formally accused Russia of a campaign of cyber attacks against U.S. political organizations ahead of the election. Obama said he warned Russian President Vladimir Putin about consequences and last week ordered a review by the U.S. intelligence agencies.
Meanwhile NBC News reported late Thursday that U.S. intelligence officials have “a high level of confidence” that Putin was personally involved in the Russian cyber campaign against the United States.
The CIA has assessed that the attacks were aimed at helping Trump win the 2016 election, a position not endorsed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) or the FBI, according to a senior U.S. official, due to lack of creible evidence, which suggests that Trump is correct in questioning the narrative being spun by the White House.
Meanwhile, the push to overturn the will of the people continues, with a full court press on the country’s 538 electors, in a desperate attempt by the administration, democrats and now, celebrities, to get at least 37 republican Electors to change their vote from Trump to “someone else.”
We anticipate this story won’t end until Monday’s vo
Kissinger On Trump World Order: “The President-Elect Is a Personality… American Policy Evolving”
All i can say is it will be an interesting 4 years!
Democrats Desperate to Steal Election from Trump at All Costs
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Dec 15, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
I have never seen in my lifetime the deep hatred that is emerging in politics. Obama is clearly getting his CIA cronies to stir the pot claiming that Putin hacked the DNC to seek revenge on Hillary. But exposing the corruption inside the Democrats is not justification to overturn the election. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) daughter and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta are backing the effort to get electors to ignore the election and vote for Hillary. They are claiming they have now 30+ people to turn and that means if neither candidate gets 270, it goes to the House or Representatives. Yet we are talking about really turning up the civil unrest. The Democrats refuse to accept any loss and they are intent on trying to really force Marxism down everyone’s throats. We are talking about real bloodshed on the streets if this were to take place. It will be civil war.
Any way I look at this, the model has beaten my personal view every single time. I really fear that this up cycle will be far worse than I personally had hoped. Even if this latest effort to steal the election fails, the left will not accept Trump no matter what. Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar on “The View” will not let unity take place. They refuse to preach peace but prefer to inspire hatred and to refuse to accept Trump as President. Behar is preaching revolution and is telling the electors if they are patriotic they should vote for Hillary. How is that patriotic? The press will not support Trump and see this as their way or no way – real democratic.
This is really getting out of hand and it all comes to a head on Monday the 19th. Looks like the Supreme Court will be called in on this one as well if the electors are bribed to overrule the people. This is really the ultimate peak in corruption. Hillary is hiding out to pretend she has nothing to do with this. She will stop at nothing.
Congressman Gets 10 Years in Prison for Corruption
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Dec 15, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
Former U.S. Congressman Chaka Fattah was sentenced to 10 years in prison for misspending government grants and charity money to fund his campaign and personal expenses. It is amazing how the standards are so different for anyone other than the Clintons. U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle called the Philadelphia Democrat’s crimes “astonishing,” especially since he and his wife Renee Chenault-Fattah, who was an NBC TV anchor, had a $500,000 annual income that put them in the “top 1 percent.”
Fattah spent two decades in Congress before losing the primary this year. He went to trial earlier this year and the jury found that Fattah took an illegal $1 million loan from a wealthy friend to prop up his failed 2007 campaign for Philadelphia mayor. He then repaid some of it with federal grant money from NASA that he had steered to an education nonprofit run by loyal former staffers. Like Hillary, he used $23,000 in nonprofit funds to repay his son’s college loans and took an $18,000 bribe to try to help a friend become an ambassador. He even lobbied President Barack Obama on the friend’s behalf, but to no avail. Fattah and his wife used the $18,000 for a down payment on a Poconos vacation home. Fattah made up the excuse to authorities that the $18,000 covered the friend’s purchase of a Porsche owned by his TV star wife, but the Porsche never left their garage.
The Judge said, “For someone so interested in advancing education for the disadvantaged, you had the temerity to steal from the Educational Advancement Alliance, a nonprofit supported by government funds.”
The judge continued saying it was really “astonishing” that he would steal money to cover his son’s debts, pay taxes, and buy a family vacation home.
His son is serving a five-year prison term in an overlapping fraud case that went to trial last year. His son was convicted of using fraudulently obtained business loans to fund his jet-setter lifestyle. His wife resigned from TV when she was named in the indictment as a participant in the bribery scheme. She was never charged and has denied wrongdoing. But the two political consultants for her husband also pleaded guilty in the case and testified against him. There were four others convicted at trial including former Philadelphia Deputy Mayor Herbert Vederman who had sought the ambassadorship.
KOMMONSENTSJANE – NOT SO BRIGHT
Couldn’t say it any better!

And these are suppose to be intelligent people?
Stephanopoulos’ Wife: Our 14-Year-Old Daughter Screamed ‘NO ABORTION!’ After Horrifying Trump Win
By: Ben Shapiro,
December 13, 2016
While appearing on a show that lowers the collective IQ of the nation by at least one standard deviation, The View, Ali Wentworth, wife of ABC News Objective News Anchor™ George Stephanopoulos explained what Election Night was like at the Stephanopoulos/Wentworth home: “It involves my 14-year-old getting upset about the election and screaming ‘NO ABORTION!’ really loudly, and I was like, ‘you haven’t kissed a boy yet. Don’t use that term so flippantly.’”
If you’re wondering why the left has gone insane, perhaps it’s because they were raised to be insane, and they’re raising their children the same way.
Why in the world does a 14-year-old girl think that her world is ending because Donald Trump has been elected president? More importantly, why would…
View original post 358 more words




