Former U.S. Attorney Discusses “High Stakes” Within Flynn Legal Strategy….


Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy weighs in on the latest developments within the Michael Flynn case.   As McCarthy points out, if Judge Sullivan doesn’t accept the defense position of gross misconduct by the prosecution; and if Sullivan does not dismiss the case; Flynn could end up on a worse position than the prior plea agreement.

Additionally McCarthy discusses the potential risks present for John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey; and then goes in to his perspective on the impeachment inquiry.

President Trump Receives Bipartisan Justice Award and Delivers Keynote Speech During Second Step Presidential Justice Forum…


President Trump visited South Carolina yesterday, receiving an award and delivering the keynote speech at Benedict College, a Historically Black College and University (HBCU). [Video and Transcript Below]

.

[Transcript] – THE PRESIDENT: Two great gentlemen. Thank you very much. And thank you all. Please, sit down.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: We love you, President! (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. And I want to thank Representative Donalds. There’s somebody with a future. (Laughter.) I don’t know if I’d trade him — that future — for the age. I’d love to pick up that age. That was a good age. But he’s got a tremendous future ahead of him.

And a very special thanks to Matthew Charles. I saw him on television the first time when he had so much difficulty trying to get something that he was really entitled to. And I looked at that smile. That smile is infectious, and he’s a great gentleman and we’re very proud of him.

And I’m very proud of being involved with criminal justice reform and getting it done, getting it passed. And we had a lot of votes that normally wouldn’t have gone that way. And they really — they were pushing me, some of them, at the end. And we have some of the folks here: Tim Scott and Lindsey. They’re here. But I’m going to introduce them in a little while.

But we had tremendous help. This was a bipartisan bill. We had a lot of support on both sides. And people that you would’ve least expected really helped us a lot. So, they’ve been trying to get this passed for many, many years.

But to everyone at the 20/20 Bipartisan Justice Center: It’s my great privilege to speak with you today, and my true honor to receive the Bipartisan Justice Award. I am very, very grateful for that. And it will be at a very high level in the Oval Office — a place called the Oval Office. Have you heard about that? (Applause.) It’ll be right in the Oval Office with me. I’m very proud of it. Thank you.

I also want to thank everyone from one of our nation’s incredible HBCUs — I’ve been working with them — Benedict College. We know Benedict College. (Applause.) And especially your very dynamic president, Dr. Roslyn Clark Artis. (Applause.) Where are you? Where is Doctor? Where are you?

And the outstanding students who are joining us today. You are outstanding and you have a tremendous future. Thank you. Thank you all. Thank you. (Applause.)

We’re thrilled to be on your campus and to celebrate all that we have achieved together and to discuss the actions that we’re taking to build a future of safety and opportunity and fairness for all Americans.

Four years ago, 20 African American Republicans and 20 African American Democrats founded the 20/20 Bipartisan Justice Center to advance the cause of criminal justice reform. And I’d heard about it for so long and it was going nowhere. Nowhere. But they all got together, and you fought to fix a broken system. You sought to confront inequality and stop injustice. And you worked to restore hope and optimism where they are really needed the most and where there was very little.

With your help, last year we brought the whole country together to achieve a truly momentous milestone. They said it couldn’t be done. Past administrations had tried and failed. Some didn’t try very hard. I will sell- — I will say that. But they tried and they failed.

After years of waiting, we assembled a historic coalition. And it was indeed historic. We had them so liberal you wouldn’t believe it, and so conservative you wouldn’t believe it. And they got together. I said, “How did we do that one?” But it was a beautiful thing to watch. It really was.

And we rallied activists, and faith leaders, and law enforcement, and lawmakers alike. We worked across party lines very strongly.
After all of the work and effort, we passed the bill and I proudly signed it into law — the most significant criminal justice reform in many generations.

We call it the FIRST STEP Act. I sort of liked the idea of just calling it “Criminal Justice Reform.” But FIRST STEP is good because that allows a second step and a third step. And that’s okay because we can go there, too. (Applause.)

But the FIRST STEP Act proved that we can achieve amazing breakthroughs when we come together as a nation and we put the interests of our citizens before the interests of any political party.

Since we passed this landmark legislation, 10 states have followed our lead and passed legislation that takes critical steps to advance criminal justice reform at the state level. We gave it a beautiful stepping stone. And some states have come and they’ve really taken it to a level that you’d be very proud of. And it’s only because of what we did that they were able to do it legally and in many other ways.

So I want to say congratulations to all of the leaders here today from Arizona, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Michigan, Nevada, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Tennessee. Congratulations. Great job. Really great job. (Applause.)

We’re also grateful to all of the mayors, city council members, and state legislators who are fighting for reform in your own communities. I especially want to thank the South Carolina leaders. And I have their names written down; there are so many of them. I’ll do this before you, Henry. Is that okay? I want to introduce our great governor. They love Henry. (Applause.) They might like Peggy more, but that’s okay. But we’ll do this first.

State Senator — and they’ve helped so much — and President of the Senate, Harvey Peeler. Harvey? Where are you, Harvey? Thank you, Harvey. (Applause.)

State Senator Gerald Malloy. Gerald, thank you very much. Thank you. (Applause.)

State Senator Katrina Shealy. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. (Applause.) I thought you were over there.

And statehouse members: Speaker Jay Lucas. Jay? Thank you, Jay. Thank you, Jay. (Applause.) Majority Leader Gary Simrill. Gary, thank you. (Applause.) And all members: Brandon Newton, Mike Burns, Bill Chumley, Peter McCoy, Sylleste Davis, Chris Murphy, Bobby Cox, Alan Clemmons. I want to just thank all of you for being here. And I’m sure that we probably left some out and they’ll never speak to me again. You see? (Laughter.) But all we can do is try.

I have all these names written down. And they’ve worked very hard, and they’ve worked hard. And I said they really have to be mentioned because they’ve been tremendous supporters of all of us. So thank you all for being here. We appreciate it. Thank you. (Applause.)

With us this afternoon is a very special friend of mine. He was with me from day one, before it was fashionable. (Laughter.) And he picked a winner. It’s like going to a horse race, isn’t it? (Laughter.) He picked a winner. But he had good feelings, and he was tremendously loyal friend and he’s a great governor. And he’s become more and more popular. I never want to see his approval rating go above mine; otherwise, we’ll have to come in and give it one slightly negative speech — (laughter) — about Henry McMaster. Thank you, Henry. (Applause.)

And also, please, Peggy McMaster, First Lady. Congratulations on a job well done. Thank you, Peggy. She has been by his side — I’ll tell you. Thank you very much, both. Great job you’re doing, too, as governor.

Lieutenant Governor Pamela Evette. Pamela, thank you. Pamela Evette, thank you. (Applause.) Thank you very much.

And Alan Wilson is here someplace. Alan? Alan? Thank you, Alan. Great job, Alan. (Applause.) Thank you very much.

Two friends of mine that are warriors — really, warriors. Two great people. And you have them both. They’re senators and they fight. And somebody just said, Lindsey, we’re up to 50 already and we — I haven’t even made a phone call. Fifty. Fifty out of fifty-three. And they said, “If you get to 40, that’s pretty good, if you haven’t done anything.” But we’re up to 50. I don’t know if you’ve heard that, Lindsey. Did you hear that? And Tim said that was going to happen.

But two really great men. They love your state and they love the people of this country. They love our country. Lindsey Graham and Tim Scott. Could you please — (applause). Thank you, fellas. Thank you.

All I can say is, thank goodness they’re on my side — (laughter) — because if they weren’t, I’d have big trouble, right? They’re warriors. They really are. They’ve done so many different things: tax cuts and all of the things we’ve done for our military, and Choice. Military Choice. They were right in there. And, Tim and Lindsey, you never let the people down. Forget about me; you never let the people down. Thank you very much. Great job. (Applause.)

And Representative Ralph Norman. I want to just mention he’s been a friend of mine, he’s been a warrior. (Applause.) Very popular guy.

But we learned a lot, because Ralph had one election. “He was so far ahead that everybody said, “Hey let’s not vote; he’s going to win too easily.” We can never let that happened again, because he — he won. But it was a little closer than we thought. Everybody stayed home. We can never let that happen. So we always have to pretend we’re one point behind, right? But he is a fantastic man and he’s been incredible, and he’s really a popular person in South Carolina.

And Joe Wilson. Joe? Joe, thank you. (Applause.) Thank you, Joe. Joe is an incredible guy. Been with us from day one, I think, Joe. Right? Day one. And he loves this state and he loves our country. Thank you very much, Joe. Great job. Appreciate it.

And Columbia Mayor Steve Benjamin. Steve, thank you very much. Steve. (Applause.) Thank you. Thank you, Steve. Great job.

Thanks also to my good friends, Pastor Darrell Scott and Kareem Lanier. Where is Darrell? You talk about a warrior — this guy. (Applause.) I met him a long time ago. He was defending me on CNN — low-ratings CNN. And — (laughter) — and he was brutal. You know, I said, “He’s a pastor. He’s a man of the cloth. And, boy, can he go at it.” (Laughter.) So you have the two — you have that little dichotomy, but he never let it bother him. And what he has done in defending us, I will never, ever forget it. Darrell Scott has been incredible. Both of them.

But when I saw Darrell on television, I said, “You have to get — we have to find out who that man is. He’s fantastic.” Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you both. Thank you, Darrell. (Applause.)

And I always thought he was a very young guy. How many years are you married to your great wife?

MR. SCOTT: Only 38.

THE PRESIDENT: I said, “How many years are you married?” I thought he was like 40 years old. (Laughter.) He said, “We’re having our anniversary.” He’s got an incredible wife. “Oh, how many years?” “Thirty-eight years.” I said, “You got to be kidding me.” Thirty-eight, right? Thirty-eight. That’s great. Congratulations, Darrell. Thank you. Thank you very much. Great friend of mine.

And we’re also joined by several outstanding members of my administration — people that have really made a difference: Secretary of HUD Ben Carson. (Applause.)

A man that has had more impact on investment in various cities and inner cities and people that really need help — an incredible, inspirational man; an unbelievable athlete; and somebody that’s done a job that — we can’t even believe what a great job he’s done, because opportunity — you know, I don’t know if you go see what’s happening with Opportunity Zones; I don’t think there’s ever been anything like it. And I have to give Tim Scott a lot of credit for that. Maybe all of it. (Applause.)

You know, I go around and I talk about Tim Scott where they’re not that familiar. And I say, “Yeah, there’s a senator from South Carolina.” I could be in the other parts of the country. “Tim Scott.” And they come to me, “Why did you mention Tim Scott? Why didn’t you take more credit?” I said, “Because, honestly, it was his idea.” We got it done together, but it was.

And, Tim, I don’t think we could have picked a better person than Scott Turner to make our vision come true. It’s the hottest thing there is. I don’t think there’s been anything like it. (Applause.) So, fantastic job. What a job.

Johnathan Holifield, who’s with me, and Ja’Ron Smith, who’s with me and been with me for a long time. I want to thank you both. I know Ja’Ron was back here. (Applause.) Where is Ja’Ron? He was back here. There he is. He never wants credit. You know, usually he’ll stay back there and I don’t want you ever to be — I want you to be right where you should be. But you are — what a job you guys have done. Thank you very much.

And a very special thanks to someone who worked tirelessly to get this law passed. You know, I’ve always said — I think I was telling Tim before, and I pulled Lindsey aside. I said, “You know, I think he’s a liberal. He could be a liberal.” (Laughter.) Jared Kushner. He could be a liberal. (Applause.) He wanted to get that through. He came to me. I said, “Jared, okay. Okay. Just don’t ever come again. Please, just leave me alone.” (Laughter.) And we got it done. Right, Jared?

We called a couple of folks that people didn’t think would come along and they were incredible once they understood what we were doing. And it’s really — you know, it’s really worked out. It’s been a while now, right? It’s been a while. And it’s really worked out. We’ve had tremendous support, and a lot of people are very happy.

I want to extend my warmest condolences to the family and many friends of Elijah Cummings, who are celebrating his life today in Baltimore. Not long ago, I met with Elijah in the Oval Office, and I saw the passion he had with me for lowering prescription drug prices. He had a very strong passion for that.

We’re going to get it done. I will tell you, we are absolutely getting it done. But I was with Elijah and I have rarely seen anybody want to do something like that. And we’re going to have that done. Prescription prices are coming down. We’re the first year in 50 years where they have actually come down. And if we could get support on the other side, we’ll get those prices so far lower than they are right now, you won’t even believe it. I think people are going to be very surprised.

So I want to give my warmest respects. Please. (Applause.)

Every African American leader here today — we have lot of great leaders from all parts of our country — is very proud of a noble heritage. Throughout our history, African Americans have strengthened, uplifted, sustained, defended, and inspired the United States of America.

At the founding of our republic, African American heroes gave their lives for the cause of independence. In the next century, leaders like Sojourner Truth and Frederick Douglass escaped the evil of slavery and fought for the ideals enshrined in the Declaration of Independence: that we are all created equal and that our rights come from God. (Applause.) True.

In the 20th century, African American churches, civic organizations, and HBCUs, like this one — this great one that we have right here. It’s a beauty, isn’t it? A nice auditorium too, by the way, I have to say. I go to a lot of places. This is one of the nicer ones. Do you mind if we come back? (Laughter.) But you helped lead the righteous struggle to secure civil rights.

African Americans have given their blood, sweat, and tears for this nation. You are entitled to a government that protects your families, your jobs, your safety, and that always puts American citizens first. So true. So true. (Applause.)

From the beginning, my vow has been to stand up for those who have been forgotten, neglected, overlooked, and ignored. And we stand up loudly and clearly in our nation’s capital.

My goal has been to give a voice to the voiceless and to make Washington see and hear those who have been made to feel silent and to feel invisible.

Although criminal justice reform was not a theme of my campaign initially, when I came into office, I heard from countless leaders and listened to many diverse points of view, including to our great church leaders and religious leaders. Everyone from governors to law enforcement officers, faith-based ministries. They call came to see me — asked me to fight on behalf of this forgotten community.

I knew criminal justice reform was not about politics. I’m, to this day, not sure that what I did was a popular thing or an unpopular thing, but I know it was the right thing to do. (Applause.) Thank you.

Last year, Kim Kardashian West and Kanye West, they came to see me. And really good people. They really are. And they told me the story of a woman named Alice Johnson. Alice had already served 22 years for a first-time, non-violent drug offense. And she was going to be in prison for, it looked like, at least another 28 years. That’s her whole life. During her time in prison, Alice became a minister and mentored fellow inmates. She’s an incredible woman. She took responsibility for her actions, but her sentence was simply not proportionate to her crime. And that’s why I commuted Alice’s sentence.

And I’ll never forget the scene: She came out of prison, and there were her children, all grown up: big, strong guys; beautiful — really beautiful, incredible women with such love in their hearts. And they embraced and they kissed and they hugged and they cried outside of this big, monstrous prison.

It was a scene that played all over our country, and it was a scene that I don’t think anybody has any idea the impact of what that had on a lot of people that don’t maybe think like we do. It had an incredible impact. It was a beautiful thing to see. There was so much love. That was true love. And that was a truly happy family. And that was something they never expected. Twenty-eight more years.

I knew in that moment that I made the right decision. And we’re all delighted that Alice is with us. She’s been such an incredible representative. In fact, sometime I’m going to sit her down and ask what is it that you do? Please explain it to me, Alice, because I’d like to have a little bit of what you have. (Laughter.) But she has been — she’s got an incredible warmth and passion. And she really is a very special person. I’ve gotten to know her.

So, Alice, please come up and say a few words. Alice, thank you. (Applause.) Thank you, darling.

MS. JOHNSON: I never in my wildest dreams would have thought that I’d be standing before such a group as this. What an honor.

Being incarcerated, separated from my family for 22 years — almost 22 years — was one of the hardest challenges of my life. When one person goes to prison, it impacts not only that person, but their family, their communities, their society. For generations, we are impacted. Criminal justice reform is not a partisan issue. We are human beings.

I represent, as you see my face here, see the faces of the ones that you will never see unless we come together; unless we come together to act to cause other families to be reunited the way that I was reunited with my family. It was only by the grace of God that our President’s heart was touched by my story and signed papers to commute my sentence.

Kim — (applause) — and I want to thank all of you for the warm reception that I have received since I came home. I think that my story touched so many who saw it, who read about it, who heard about it, because we are just regular people. When I came home, I didn’t come home as an ex-felon, I came home as a returning citizen. (Applause.)

So I just want to say thank you again for all of the work that is being done. I thank all of our legislators who have come together and put aside all of their political differences to work on this very important issue, because this truly has become a movement and it is one that we as returning citizens would not allow you to forget those who have been left behind. Thank you. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Fantastic. Thank you, darling. I’m proud of you.

Thank you, Alice. And Alice’s story not only touched my heart, but it showed me that significant disparities and injustices can exist in the criminal justice system. And I actually went to Alice and I said, “Alice, you were in a prison for 22 years. You got to know a lot of people in that prison. How many people do you have in that were — there’s only one Alice, right? — but people like you. People that are there for so many years for something that, really, it’s time to come out?” And I said, “Because I want their names.” And she knows. Right? She knows the ones. She knows the ones that we’re talking about. Some great people are there.

And so we’re going to work on that, right? You’re going to give me a big list and we’re going to do — we’re going to do some good things. Okay? (Applause.) She goes, “Hmm, probably.” Thank you, Alice. Great job.

The more people I spoke with, the more clear it became that the system could be deeply unfair, contributing to a tragic cycle of poverty and crime and incarceration.

To redress this unfairness, the FIRST STEP Act made transformative changes. We rolled back the unjust provisions of the 1994 Clinton crime law — (applause) — which disproportionately harmed the African American community. You know that. I remember very well what happened.

Here with us today is one of the Americans who changed her life and was recently released under the FIRST STEP Act: Tanesha Bannister. And please, Tanesha, come up and tell us your story. Thank you very much. Please. (Applause.)

MS. BANNISTER: As the President of the United States says, my name is Tanesha Bannister. I was released, after doing sixteen and a half years, under the FIRST STEP Act. And it was because of that act that I was able to reunite with my family. I’m joined here today by my son, Abel. He’s somewhere in the crowd. There. (Applause.)

I want to thank all the political leaders and the organizations that helped push this act — organizations like Cut50 that led this act to free not only just me, but thousand of others. I want to thank all the political leaders that crossed party lines and stepped out of their comfort zone to make this happen.

So many, like myself, have been displaced in the criminal justice system for so long. But I stand here today to say: Because of the FIRST STEP Act, we’re able to move towards the second step.

I want to thank the President for giving me another lease on life. If it wasn’t for you, Mr. President, I’ll still be serving five years in prison. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: All right. That’s good. That’s good.

MS. BANNISTER: And I’ll be forever grateful for that.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.

MS. BANNISTER: I just want society to know that this is one bright spot that we can stand on that’s not an issue that has to be forgotten about. It’s one that has been focused on by not only just the political leaders, but the organizations that fight, that (inaudible) to Washington. That was our voice when we didn’t have a voice to be heard.

And I just want to say “thank you.” I want to say that, in order to take the first step, you have to be willing to do things that you’re not comfortable with. You might — you don’t have to be willing to have conversations that you’re not willing to have.

For decades, the criminal justice conversation has been a hard conversation to have. Almost non-existent. It was all about the political leaders thinking about who can be tough on crime, who can lock up the most and throw away the key. It dehumanized. But I’m standing here today saying: This is what a second chance looks like. (Applause.)

I’m determined not to let my past define my future, but to continue to move forward day by day, step by step, and not forget about the ones that are left behind. There’s still work to do. But what I can say is, on this day, a change has been made, and we’ll looking forward to things to come in the near future.

Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Benedict College, for having me. Thank all the political leaders and organizations that fought for not just myself but others like me.

FIRST STEP Act not only freed thousand of people, but it helped rehabilitate us, to have us ready to integrate back into society and live a comfortable life.

And I just want to say thank you again. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, darling. Alice, when is she running for office, please? I want to back her. We have to back her, right? That was not a written speech, folks. That was delivered from the heart. That was incredible.

Tanesha, do you mind if I take a couple of the lines you just gave and use them in my future speeches, please? (Laughter.)

And, Tanesha, like Alice, I want you to go give me some recommendations of people that you lived with for many years that you know are good people, that are in there for a long period of time. I want you to give me a list of names, okay? Because I know — give me only the right ones. You know the — (applause) — you got a tough couple of bad ones in there too, Tanesha, right? And that’s okay, too. But give me the right ones, the two of you, and as soon as you can. Okay? Because you know some great people that are going to be there for many, many years, Alice. Right? And you’re going to give me some names, all right? Thank you both. Thank you. (Applause.) Incredible. Thank you both.

To ease former inmates’ return to society, the single-most important action we can take is to help them find a good job.

As a result of our tax cuts, our regulatory cuts, and pro-American trade and, you know, we’re putting America first — I think everyone likes that very much — the energy reforms — our economy is booming. It’s booming like never before. Nothing better for former prisoners that are coming home to look for a job when there’s very low unemployment. And that’s what we have right now.

Because of this, the tight labor market, employers are now recruiting Americans who have been on the sidelines for far too long, including those with criminal records. And they’re doing a phenomenal job. They come out, and they’re being hired. And I’ve had many people tell me — people that are doing the hiring — saying these people are unbelievable. They never got a chance before. So we are being helped by — they call it the “Trump economy,” but a great economy. We’re being helped by a great economy.

And perhaps our economy is the best criminal justice reform of all, because when people can get a job, earn a paycheck, and find purpose in their work, and especially when they are coming out of prison, it’s an incredible thing. (Applause.) It’s really an incredible thing.

And we’re setting records also. When they come out, they’re not going back, in many cases. Statistically much, much better. That’s because they get a job and they like it. They love it. But before, they were never getting that job and bad things were happening.

For years, applicants with criminal records were dismissed out of hand, just automatically: “Nope. We’re not interested.” And even if they were qualified, and if you thought they were reformed, they couldn’t get work.

My administration is working vigorously to remove barriers to re-entry and to encourage second-chance hiring. And we’re really doing a great job. When we say “Hire American,” we mean all Americans. Every single American. That’s what we want.

Instead of hiring low-wage labor from overseas, we’re asking companies to hire American citizens, including former prisoners who have been reformed. America is stronger, and our society is brighter, when everyone can contribute, participate, and join in our national revival. And that’s what it is. We have a national revival going on like you haven’t seen in a long time.

Our two great senators, Tim and Lindsey, have been so helpful. I can’t even tell you how helpful.

Here with us today is Jerome Brown, who served 11 years in prison and now is a master barber. Oh, good. I can have my hair properly cut. (Laughter.) Where is he? Lindsey, do you have a scissor on you, by any chance? (Laughter.) Finally, I can get a good haircut. I’ve been criticized for a long time.

Now, it’s — and doing really well. He has more than 500 clients. And, Jerome, I’d love you to come up and say a few words. But perhaps more importantly, check out my hair. See what you can do for me. (Laughter and applause.) Thank you, Jerome.

MR. BROWN: First, I would just like to say thank you to the President for giving everybody a chance. Because, a lot of times, there are people in prison, and you don’t really know, like, their goals or, you know, what they want in life unless they have a chance.

I was kind of fortunate. When I walked through the doors of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, I had a goal in mind. And my goal was to educate myself, and to read and to help my entire 11 years. So, during that time, I made curriculums. I started a program called, “Criminal and Addictive Thinking.” I had barber classes. And I was mentoring guys that couldn’t read or write. I would help them. Anything I can do to help somebody, because helping them helped me.

And it couldn’t have been done without support neither. So, support from my family and my wife Keisha (ph). We’ve been married 24 years. The staff in the BOP.

And now that I’m looking at the FIRST STEP Act, the President is also giving a lot of guys and women support again. Because without the support, they don’t have the incentive to do things positive for their life and to make a change. So, for that, Mr. President, I thank you very much.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Jerome. You’re so beautiful. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

MR. BROWN: My goal now is just to mentor people as much as I can. I mentor guys now that still come home. I try to show them the right way, not to give up, because a lot of people give up easily just because of a criminal record. And they just think that’s the easy way out, just to say, “Oh, I have a record. They’re not going to hire me anyway.”

One quick example: When I was in prison, I had to renew my barber’s license. And for five years straight, New York state denied me because of moral turpitude — because of my conviction. Every year, I say, I don’t care. I’m just going to spend $40 every year. And if they deny me, I’m just going to do it every day until I get out. And eventually, they approved it.

And I had letters from staff and everybody that gave me support. So it’s like — you can never give up. You know, like I said, the support right now from the FIRST STEP Act, I think it’s going to help a lot of men. There’s still a lot of good men left in there, and women.

So, my motto was just, you know: To help one person in any way is to help secure the future everywhere. Thank you. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Jerome. Fantastic job. Thank you very much. Thank you, Jerome. Incredible job.

On criminal justice reform, trade, the economy, and so much else, our America First Agenda is focused on expanding opportunity for citizens of every race, religion, color, and creed.

For decades, politicians of both parties put their own interests ahead of your interests, and put the interests of foreign nations ahead of the interest of our nation.

Our leaders spent $8 trillion on wars in the Middle East, but they allowed our great cities to fall into tragic decay and disrepair. For the cost of one year of war in the Middle East, we could have given scholarships to every child at every inner city school in America and had tremendous numbers of dollars left over. Politicians drained America’s wealth policing ancient tribal conflicts overseas, while leaving generations of African American children trapped in failing government schools and in failing inner cities.

The same Washington establishment enacted ruinous trade policies that shuttered our factories and shipped our jobs very far away to other countries. More than half a million African Americans lost good-paying manufacturing jobs after the twin disasters of NAFTA and China’s entrance into the World Trade Organization. That was a bad day.

At the same time, lawmakers and corporations joined forces to push immigration policies that hurt working-class Americans of all backgrounds. Many politicians fight harder in Congress for illegal immigrants than they do for United States citizens. (Applause.)

My administration will always put American communities first. On issue after issue, politicians raked in cash from special interests while selling out our nation’s workers and our nation’s great families.

Under this administration, the great betrayal of the American worker is over. After years of rebuilding — (applause) — thank you. After years of rebuilding foreign countries, we are finally rebuilding our country, renewing our cities, and securing our neighborhoods, and protecting our own forgotten communities.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Make America great!

THE PRESIDENT: All my life — that’s right. Make America great. (Laughter.) I couldn’t have said it better than you did. Thank you. Thank you, darling.

All my life, I’ve been committed to advancing fairness and opportunity for the African American community. And today, I am here before you with the empty — and we have to say, we’ve had so many people with empty political rhetoric. We’re doing the opposite. We’re acting, not talking. People have talked. (Applause.) They’ve talked. They’ve talked a lot and they’ve got nothing done. And we’re talking about for a century. We’re talking about for over a hundred years it’s been all talk by a certain group of politicians and no action.

Tim Scott, Lindsey Graham — they’ve done more in the last couple of years than some of our, I hate to call them opponents, but I guess that’s what they are, unfortunately. But they have done more than they have in a hundred years.

I am here to report on real actions that we’ve taken, real promises that we’ve kept, and real results that we’ve delivered.

Since the election, the unemployment rates for African American, Hispanic American, and Asian Americans have achieved all-time, historic — in the history of our country — lows. Today we have more working — (applause) — today we have people working at a level and a number, in the history of country. we’ve never had so many people working before. Almost 160 million people. Never come close.

African American youth unemployment — so important — a number that, three years ago, when I was running, was through the roof. It was, you know, just incredible. It recently reached the lowest rate ever recorded. Youth unemployment. So important.

African American poverty rate has reached its lowest level ever recorded in the history of our country. (Applause.)

So, when I’m up on the debate stage with one of these characters, whoever it may be — (laughter) — and I rattle off a couple of those stats, I don’t know how they’re going to beat me. They’re going to have to be awfully good. They’re going to have to be awfully good.

More than 2 million Americans have been raised out of poverty — taken out of poverty, lifted out of poverty. For the first time on record, most new hires of prime working age are minorities and women. That’s the first time in the history of our country. (Applause.) Minorities and women.

Wages are rising fast. And they are rising twice as fast for the lowest-income workers than they are for the high-wage earners. Proportionately, they’re doing the best of all. Women — the best year for employment in 71 years. And soon, I think, it will be historic. It will be “in history.” (Applause.) That’s a good number.

A recent analysis found that middle class income has risen by $5,000. But add to that — that’s median household income — add to that $2,000 from the tax cuts and then $2,000 for energy, because our energy is much cheaper. And when you look at other countries, what we’ve done with energy, we become the number-one producer anywhere in the world, by far. And so that would be $9,000 per household. Median income.

Think of the household median income. Nobody has ever come close. If you go back and you look at the Bush — eight years — it’s $400, for eight years. You go back and you look at the Obama — eight years — it’s less than $1,000. And with us, it’s $9,000, when you add — think of that. And that’s for two and a half years, if they stopped at two and a half. It’s even better now, because we’re almost up to three. I don’t even know if you folks know that, but think of that statistic: $400 for eight years, $975 for eight years, and $9,000 for two and a half years. I mean — (applause.)

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.

AUDIENCE: Four more years! Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. I just — that just came out. That came out in a poll — Moody’s. And it just came out in a poll. And you can never take this — they said I’ll win the election, practically, no matter what. They had three different forms of win. And they’ve been right in every year except for one. You know what the one was? The last one. They got that one wrong. (Laughter.) Did you know that, fellas? They got that one wrong. They said, “We were wrong about 2016.” They don’t even mention that I happened to be in that election. But they said that was the only one they got wrong. That’s okay with me. (Laughter.) If they’re going to get one wrong, that was the one we wanted them to get wrong, right?

But those are incredible numbers. Those are numbers that nobody would have believed possible. If I would have said that on the campaign trail, people would have said, “You have to be kidding.” They would have said — the fake news said, “You have to be kidding.” (Laughter.) “He’s not telling the truth, ladies and gentlemen.” Well, it turned out that’s far more than we even anticipated.

Through our Pledge to American Workers, more than 360 companies have committed to providing over 14 million training jobs and career opportunities for the American worker. My daughter, Ivanka, worked so hard on that. That’s her love. It’s her passion. It’s incredible.

She came to me at the beginning of the administration, and she said, “I want to help people get jobs, Dad. But they have to be trained.” She was a great student. She’s a great person. And she said, “But they have to be trained.” I said, “What’s your goal?” She said, “500,000 jobs.” She just hit 14 million. Can you be- — I said, “That’s Ivanka.” (Applause.) You know, that’s Ivanka. Fourteen million jobs. (Applause.)

It’s an incredible — it’s one of the reasons, I think, that our employment numbers are so good. I hope that you will judge my administration based on the tremendous amount that we’ve achieved — not talking, but achieving.

We’ve made — it’s — it’s really something. (Applause.) It’s really something. And the support that you’ve given is incredible.

We’ve made our nation stronger than ever before. And I’m here to tell you that we’re just getting started. And we’re just getting started for the African American community too. Please remember that. And I will say this, and I really say this with great confidence: The best is yet to come. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you very much. Now, don’t say, “Sixteen more years,” because you’ll drive them crazy. (Laughter.) They’re afraid. They said, “You know, he’s going to win.” They said — one of these characters said, “You know, he’s going to win, don’t you? You know, he’s going to win.” “Well, no, we’re going to fight.” “He’s going to win and then he’s never getting out. He’ll be here for another four, and then another four, and then another. We’re never going to get him out.”

So when we say “four more years,” sometimes say “16 more years”. It drives them crazy. (Laughter.) And we like doing that, don’t we?

But as we make tremendous strides to deliver greater economic promise to all our citizens, we’ll never let up on our efforts to ensure that our justice system is fair for every single American.

And I have my own experience, you know that. You see what’s going on with the witch hunt. It’s a terrible thing that’s going on in our country. No crimes there. It’s an investigation in search of a crime. It’s been going on for longer than I’m in office. (Laughter.) It’s true. It happened before I even got here with — remember? — the insurance policy. Strzok and Page, the lovers, the great lovers. (Laughter.) The two great lovers, they talked about the insurance policy, right? That, “She’s going to win, but just in case she doesn’t, we have an insurance policy.” That was long before Mueller, and that whole deal.

We had 18 angry Democrats that hated Trump, looking at me. Spent $45 million, and they found nothing. I think I could do that with almost everyone in the room, except maybe your two senators. I could never find a — that’s why they’re senators, because they’re so clean, right?

But, in America, you’re innocent until proven guilty. And we don’t have investigations in search of that crime. It’s a terrible thing. It hurts people very badly and it divides the country.

Innocent people, and those surrounding innocent people, were being destroyed and humiliated. We have so many people that have been hurt, destroyed, and humiliated in ways that we’ve never seen before in the history of our country. And we’re working to put an end — for everybody — to horrible injustice and the horrible practices that we’ve seen. It’s just — not only here, it’s — it’s in other places. It’s in some pretty high places.

Justice, fairness, and due process are core tenets of our democracy. These are timeless principles I will faithfully uphold as President. They’re principles Republicans stand for and, historically, Democrats have stood for in the past. They used to stand for them. If this were a Democrat, they would never allow this to happen. They would never, ever allow this to happen.

And I’ll tell you, Tim Scott made the finest statement yesterday. He said, “The President is innocent. Forget about due process. He’s innocent.” And I won’t forget that statement.

We have a — (applause) — we have to remember — a big factor, and I say it in more and more of my speeches, because Honest Abe was something pretty special. Abraham Lincoln, he was a Republican, a President revered for what he did to preserve our nation and union and to abolish slavery. Abe Lincoln was a Republican. A lot of people forget that. Fellas, I think we have to start bringing that up a little bit, okay? (Applause.) People forget that. They don’t know that. They don’t assume it, actually.

We’re committed to upholding his legacy and the sacred principle that all people are entitled to live in freedom and dignity. I’m talking about Lincoln more and more, because the Democratic policies have let African Americans down and taken them for granted. And they have. They’ve taken African American communities for granted. And I promise you that Republicans will never, ever do that. We’re going to keep fighting for you and we’re fighting hard, and we’re really having an impact. (Applause.) And you’re having an impact on elections now. And you should never let that happen, but they have taken advantage.

I will always fight against abuses of power from any source. And I will always champion the right to due process, the right to a fair trial, the right to good legal representation for every American, regardless of race, background, position, right? (Applause.) It’s a big thing, legal representation. A lot of people get in a lot of trouble because they have the wrong representation. And they say, “Why I didn’t have somebody that knew what he was doing or tried or was fair?”

This is my promise to each and every one of you: I’m hearing that more and more African Americans are supporting our Republican policy agenda because they see the results that we’re delivering. (Applause.)

You know, during the campaign, I read a long list of things. It was a speech, regular speech. Long list. Highest crime rate: African American. Highest crime rate. Worst housing situation. Lived in the worst areas. Everything was bad. Worst education. There were like 10 — And I’m going over 10 things, over and over and over. Highest rate of incarceration. And this is all African American.

And I said to myself — probably I shouldn’t say it, but I’m going to say, “Vote for me. What the hell do you have to lose?” Do you remember that? (Applause.) “What the hell do you have to lose?” I said it. (Applause.)

By the way, I hate to say this to you, but my poll numbers with African Americans, Tim, went like a rocket ship. Okay? My people said, “I don’t know if that was good to say.” I said, “Look, it’s the truth. What the hell do you have to lose?” And you know what? I said it, and sometimes I take the word “hell” out because the fake news would say, “He used a horrible word. The word ‘hell’ was a horrible…” I said, “I’ve heard worse than that.” (Laughter.) But it was true.

And look at what we’ve done in less than three years. I mean, look at the progress you’ve made. Everything is historic, meaning it’s never happened in the history of our country, what we’ve done. And we’re very proud of it.

And, you know, it’s an incredible, talented, smart, wonderful, warm — look at the people that came up today; warm group of people. And I have so many friends. They’re great, great, and I am so honored. I just am so honored. And, Jerome, I’m putting you in the same category with these two incredible women. If you have some people in there that you’ve been with for a long period of time, you’re going to give me some names. I only want the right names, Jerome. Okay? (Laughter.) I only want the right ones.

But I think it’s a tremendous thing we can do. We can do a lot of great things from — it’s called the power of the White House. We can do some incredible things. And we want to only do the right things. But these are three unbelievable representatives. And there are so many more out there that we don’t know about. We want to find out who they are so we can help them out too. Jared, I’ll put you in charge of that little project. That’s something he’d like to do very much, right? (Applause.)

So as part of our agenda to lift up forgotten Americans, we are investing in distressed communities. Under the crucial provision — a very, very important provision of our new tax law — America’s governors have designated nearly 9,000 communities as the Opportunity Zones that we just discussed, including this very neighborhood surrounding Benedict College. And you see what’s happening even just around your college and in your college.

To bring back prosperity, we slashed taxes on new investment in these areas. And people are investing in these areas that would have never, ever been investing here. And in some cases, they’re rich, and in some cases, they’re not so rich, but the money is flowing into your community. Nine thousand different places.

And I directed every member of my Cabinet to support Opportunities Zones in every possible way. And leading these efforts is Secretary Ben Carson, along with executive director of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council, Scott Turner. Great job. Mick Mulvaney is here someplace. Where’s Mick? He’s here someplace. Where is Mick? (Applause.) And a lot of people are here, a lot of people that have done an incredible job for this community and for the country.

Within my first weeks in office, I also signed an executive order to support historically black colleges and universities — (applause) — by moving federal HBCU initiative to the White House, where it belongs. It’s now in the White House.

Over the past two years, we have increased federal funding for HBCUs by a record 13 percent. Check out the last administration. See what they did for you. Not too much. Not too much.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Nothing.

THE PRESIDENT: You said it: “Nothing.” Not much. Check it out. I don’t want to get into this. I’ll get myself in trouble. But I want you to check it out yourself.

My administration will always treasure and protect HBCUs, like Benedict College. It’s very important. It’s very important. The story of this institution reminds us all how African American leaders have helped America stand for what is just, noble, right, and true.

Nearly 150 years ago, Benedict College began with 10 students and one great Baptist minister. Their first classes took place in a former plantation mansion. In the 1930s, Benedict students participated in one of the first civil rights campaigns in South Carolina. From the halls of this campus came American pastors and poets, advocates and athletes, innovators and entrepreneurs. In their courage, their vision, their determination, their wisdom, and their grace, they lifted up the sights of our nation and called America to greatness. They have done an incredible job. This has been an incredible institution. (Applause.)

The extraordinary legacy of generations of African American patriots shows us that the heart and spirit and soul of our nation is always found in our people. You are the source of America’s strength, the captains of America’s destiny, and the authors of America’s future.

Now, after decades of bitter disappointments and betrayals from Washington — and you have had the most bitter disappointments, more than anyone — my administration is making a decisive break with the failures of the past. We are taking on the entrenched interests, the corrupt power structures, and the rigged systems of the old status quo.

With confidence in our vision, we are putting this nation on a better and brighter path for you, for your families, and for all of our great citizens. We’re keeping our promises. We’re solving problems, righting wrongs, and boldly confronting injustices, wherever and whenever we find them.

Through it all, we are honoring our allegiance to the hardworking men and women whose sweat and sacrifice make our country run.

Together, we are reaffirming the sacred bonds of loyalty and love that unite us together as citizens and patriots and as Americans. We are defending freedom and justice and equality for every man, woman, and child all across our nation. We are fighting to bring opportunity, dignity, and hope to every block, every neighborhood, and every city and town all throughout this magnificent land.

Above all, we are putting our faith in the greatness of our people, the grace of our God, and the glorious power of redemption.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless America.

Thank you very much. Thank you. (Applause.)

END

.

Sidney Powell Discusses Flynn “Framing” With Lou Dobbs….


After filing an explosive response motion to compel Brady material, outlining a conspiracy to frame her client, defense attorney Sidney Powell appears on Fox Business with Lou Dobbs to discuss the stunning material within her presentation to the court.

Battle Lines Clearly Drawn – Federal Judge Beryl Howell Grants House Judiciary Committee Access to Mueller Grand Jury Material…


There’s a clear set of battle lines now evident amid the ongoing political and legal dynamic:  Nadler, Pelosi, Lawfare and the Deep State media -VS- Durham, Barr, Trump and the MAGA movement.

Playing directly into this dynamic today Obama appointed Judge Beryl Howell has ruled (full pdf below) an impeachment by unilateral decree is constitutionally valid; and as an outcome House Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler can have access to some of the Mueller grand jury material that was used as evidence in the “Mueller-Weissmann Report”.

It’s important to note Judge Howell granted access to only that grand jury material that was used in the Mueller Report, not a blanket authority to gain all witness testimony or grand jury material writ large.  However, having said that, the most troubling part of the decision is the background construct of the Weissmann team’s original objective.

From the outset; from the moment they started; from day number one; Weissmann, Lawfare and crew (Mueller was a special counsel figurehead only) always intended for the grand jury material to be handed to Chairman Jerry Nadler for the specific purposes of writing articles of impeachment.   This is absolutely critical to remember.

The originating goal was to use the special counsel investigation to assemble evidence of obstruction. Then to frame the assembly of all evidence toward the future goal of writing articles of impeachment.  This was the sole purpose of their coordination with Lawfare.

Every innuendo; every context of inquiry; every person, document and nuance; was intentionally brought before a grand jury with the forethought that it would eventually reach Nadler and the newly hired Lawfare staff to write the articles of impeachment.

The lengthy plan was proceeding swimmingly until AG Bill Barr was nominated and Rosenstein’s facilitation of the Lawfare crew was stopped.

Additionally Judge Beryl Howell was the judge overseeing Weissmann and Mueller’s Grand Jury proceedings, and she’s friends with Weissmann.  So it doesn’t come as a surprise to see her making somewhat bizarre statements about impeachment and of course today’s ruling.

All of the material in the grand jury file is there for a specific reason.  No evidence that refutes the obstruction case was ever presented.  This was a careful assembly, planned with forethought, toward a very specific purpose.  That’s why Chairman Nadler and his hired Lawfare contractors were so adamant about gaining access to it.  Nadler already knows what is there.

Andrew Weissman built the illusion of obstruction into the Mueller investigation; but Weissmann could not produce a final report specifically claiming obstruction took place because his collection was not based in material fact.  Weissman and crew built the illusion of obstruction blended with some radical legal theories.

That’s the material Nadler-Lawfare want now.

All of that said, it’s likely the DOJ will appeal Judge Howell’s precedent setting ruling to the DC appellate court.  The timing would normally be quite lengthy for the process; however, there is a decent likelihood the House Judiciary Committee will ask for fast track decisions due to the nature of their case.

WASHINGTON DC – […]  In her ruling, Howell ordered the DOJ to provide by Oct. 30 “[a]ll portions of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election that were redacted pursuant to” grand jury restrictions.

The order also requires the Justice Department to provide “any underlying transcripts or exhibits referenced in the portions of the Mueller Report that were redacted” pursuant to those restrictions.

“The court’s thoughtful ruling recognizes that our impeachment inquiry fully comports with the Constitution and thoroughly rejects the spurious White House claims to the contrary,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.)

A Justice Department spokeswoman said the DOJ is “reviewing the decision.”

Democrats have contended that they need Mueller’s grand jury transcripts in order to determine whether to bring articles of impeachment against Trump for conduct revealed in the course of Mueller’s investigation.  (read more)

Here’s The Ruling:

.

FISA Virus Maria Butina Released from Federal Prison for Immediate Deportation….


Ms. Maria Butina, a young Russian idealist who was caught up in the 2016 election frenzy and the vast Russian conspiracies, had strong connections to high powered Russian oligarchs.

Today she was released from federal prison and immediately deported back to Russia.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Convicted Russian agent Maria Butina was released from a Florida prison on Friday after serving most of her 18-month sentence for conspiring to influence U.S. conservative activists and infiltrate a powerful gun rights group, and taken into custody by immigration officials to be deported to her native country. (read more)

Ms. Butina pleaded guilty in December 2018 to one count of conspiring to act as a foreign agent and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.  However, the under-reported backstory to the 31-year-old Russian is actually connected to the 2016 election and FBI efforts to weaponize Ms. Butina as a FISA-enabling virus.

Originally the purpose of Butina coming to the U.S. in 2016, as explained by Patrick Byrne, was for her to engage with influential Americans for political contacts that could provide geopolitical value to the oligarchs.

Former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne was seen as important to Ms. Butina due to his connections to the emerging financial structures of crypto-currency and block-chain. Mr. Byrne is a libertarian who believes in small government, and is somewhat of a disruptor in the business world. Ms. Butina wanted to introduce Byrne to her friends in Russia.

Alternative currency options to the U.S. dollar has been an ongoing effort of Russian interests for a while. Russia considers global trade attached to the dollar as geopolitical problem; and they have been working for years on alternative currencies for trade (and their own wealth) that can avoid U.S. sanctions and the reach of the U.S. treasury.

As a Russian national with specific Russian interests that are not in alignment with U.S. national interests, Maria Butina was defined by the U.S. intelligence community as an ‘agent of a foreign power’. Her status meant unrestricted monitoring by the U.S. intelligence community was entirely legal.  However, because of this ‘foreign agent’ status Ms. Butina was also a valuable 2016 FISA virus to infect anyone the U.S. intelligence apparatus would wish to target domestically for surveillance.

Political Espionage” – During the 2016 election season, Butina’s useful purpose appeared to be the reason the FBI in Washington DC enlisted Patrick Byrne as a handler, giving Butina specific instructions and introductions to Republican presidential candidates.

Once those candidates were contacted the FBI’s background surveillance transferred to the republican politicians, including persons in/around the Trump orbit.  Mr. Byrne stated several times that FBI Agent Peter Strzok, and persons working on his behalf, was the FBI official directing the engagements.

Byrne claims he was asked to participate in an FBI intelligence operation and to introduce, and/or facilitate the introduction of, Ms. Butina to the campaigns of Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.

In December of 2015 Mr. Byrne said he became suspicious of the FBI motives because he warned FBI officials of the potential that his efforts, his reputation and those who trust him, may result in Butina gaining entry into campaign confidences. The FBI agents told Mr. Byrne that was exactly the intent.

People high up in the FBI wanted Ms. Butina to gain deep access into the Trump campaign. Mr. Byrne became suspicious of a corrupt political motive, but didn’t say anything at the time.

In/around Feb or March 2016 Byrne was told to focus Ms. Butina’s attention to the campaign of Donald Trump and to diminish any attention toward Rubio or Cruz.

Later in June & July (2016), FBI agents requested Mr. Byrne to focus on developing a closer romantic relationship with Ms. Butina and to use his influence to target her to closer proximity with the Trump family and Trump campaign.

It was within these June and July 2016 engagements where FBI agents were apologetic about the requests and specifically mentioned their instructions were coming from three principle FBI officials Byrne described as “X, Y and Z”. Later Byrne identified FBI Director James Comey as “Z”.  Mr. Byrne said the specific instructions were coming to the agents from Special Agent Peter Strzok as he relayed the requests of those above him [X, Y and Z (Comey)].

This FBI contact structure highlights an arms-length operation; perhaps intentionally constructed to create plausible deniability for those above the directly instructing agents.

In essence, these rank-and-file FBI agents were asking Patrick Byrne to be a civilian handler of a Russian national, and instructing him to carry out a covert counterintelligence operation. The FBI agents were apologetic about asking a civilian to take on such a role.

Conducting FISA-702(16)(17) database searches and electronic surveillance on U.S. persons who would meet with Butina would be justifiable and legal.

Extended contact with any U.S. person could lead to a Title-1 surveillance warrant through the FISA court, similar to what happened with Carter Page.  However, even without the FISA warrant, 702 searches would be valid just from brief contact.

As we have shown FISA-702 (“16” to-from) and (“17” about) queries were off the charts during the time-frame of November 2015 through May 2016.  Per the FISA auditconducted by NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers, after the flags noted by the database compliance officer, 85% of the search returns were unauthorized and unmasked.

The time-frames here are too coincidental to be accidental. [Judge Collyer Report]  This was the same period when DC-based FBI officials were telling Patrick Byrne who they wanted him to introduce Ms. Butina to.

From the operational description of Mr. Patrick Byrne it would appear Ms. Butina was used by the FBI to “dirty-up” political targets, opening them up for surveillance.

The FBI/NSA database can be used in real time, or in historic mapping, to monitor people simply by entering their cell phone number and filtering the geolocation.   Additionally, texts, call logs, emails, personal data and sensitive electronic communication can all be reviewed by FBI officials using this database.

What Patrick Byrne ended up describing as “political espionage” was an illicit and intentional use of an FBI counterintelligence operation to monitor the political campaign of the opposing party.

Maria Butina likely did have sketchy intentions from a U.S. strategic interest perspective; and monitoring her was perhaps justifiable.  However, specifically directing Butina on where to go and who to meet is another kettle-o-fish entirely.

That aspect is likely why Mueller, Weissmann and the corrupt small group within the DOJ and FBI, originally locked away Maria Butina in strict isolation and solitary confinement.

♦ In a Fox Business interview, Patrick Byrne described being offered a $1 billion bribe of sorts to stay quiet in 2018.  This piqued many curious questions; however, it is worth noting a bribe as described could come in a multitude of forms for a businessman who operates a massive corporation.

In 2018 Mr. Byrne’s company, Overstock, was also under an SEC investigation.

(LINK)

I’m sure it is just a coincidence, but FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok’s wife, Melissa Hodgman, happens to be the Assoc. Director of the SEC Enforcement Division, who happened to be leading the SEC investigation of Patrick Byrne’s company. [LINK]

So the wife of the FBI agent who was directing Patrick Byrne in the sketchy FBI operation targeting Donald Trump… just happens to open an investigation of Byrne shortly after the corrupt FBI operation containing her husband first hit the headlines in early 2018.

I wonder if the elimination of that SEC investigation was worth, oh, say $1 billion.

Huh, imagine that?

Coincidences.

Small world.

[LINK to SEC]

In the last 24 hours multiple media pundits, legal analysts and politicians have asked what intelligence community criminal activity AG Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham could possibly be looking at.

During his short media appearances Patrick Byrne claims he had spoken to the DOJ on April 5th, 2019, and again on April 30th, 2019. Mr. Byrne stated he told the DOJ all of the information he was aware of during those two interviews covering approximately seven hours of questioning from officials in the Department of Justice.

Maria Butina was removed from harsh isolation in prison on May 9th, ten days after Mr. Byrne delivered his testimony to the DOJ. According to Byrne Ms. Butina was moved to a very different White Collar facility based on his information.

Byrne also highlighted the May 13th DOJ appointment of John Durham to look into the origination of the Russia investigation events. Byrne feels this too was likely, at least in part, a direct result of his two DOJ sessions April 5th and 30th.

Yesterday the media began reporting that U.S. Attorney John Durham is conducting a criminal investigation.  Today Ms. Butina is released from prison and immediately deported back to Russia.

[*DISCLAIMER* – After originally outlining the process and possibilities within an article in August 2019, CTH received a thankful and congratulatory email from Mr. Byrne stating he was surprised we were able to put it all together.]

President Trump Delivers Impromptu Remarks Departing White House – Video and Transcript…


Chopper pressers are the best pressers.  Earlier today President Trump stopped to answer questions from the assembled press pool as he departed the White House.  [Video and Transcript Below]

.

[Transcript] – THE PRESIDENT: Hi, everybody. Hi. How are you? So, the stock market is doing very well. The economy is booming. We have a new record in sight. It could happen even today. But we have a new stock market record. I think it’ll be about 118 times that we’ve broken the record. Jobs look phenomenal.

We’re doing very well in Syria, with Turkey and everybody else that we’re dealing with. We have secured the oil. We have a lot of oil. We’ve secured the oil. We have a couple of people that came knocking. We said, “Don’t knock.” And I think I would say that things are going very well.

I know people are still in a basement, in a secure room in the basement, trying to make us look as bad as possible. But that’s not working too well. A lot of things are happening very good.

And I appreciate Republicans are just outraged, and the American public is outraged, that the Do-Nothing Democrats, they’re doing nothing. They are doing nothing. There’s such an opportunity to get things done. We need USMCA passed. It’s a great deal for our country, for our farmers, manufacturers, unions. It’s a great deal for our country. So we need USMCA passed.

Q Mr. President, some Democrats say comparing the impeachment inquiry to a lynching was painful and offensive. You’re going to an HBCU today. Will you apologize?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, it’s a word that many Democrats have used. It’s a word that many people have used over the years. But that’s a word that has been used many times.

And let me tell you something: The level of unfairness for a perfect conversation with the President of Ukraine — this was a perfect conversation. And, frankly, had they known what the conversation was, they wouldn’t have even wasted everybody’s time. But this was a perfect conversation with the President of Ukraine.

The President of Ukraine and his Foreign Minister, separately, came out and said there was absolutely nothing wrong with the conversation. The President of Ukraine and the Foreign Minister came out and said there was no anything. There was no — he used the word “no blackmail.” They said there was no pressure; there was nothing done wrong.

This is a hoax — just like there was no collusion. After two years, they found out and wasted $45 million. This is a disgrace that this could happen in our country.

But remember —

Q Will you apologize for using the word “lynching”?

THE PRESIDENT: Wait. Wait.

The President of Ukraine, right now — the President of Ukraine said “no pressure.” The President of Ukraine and his Foreign Minister said, again, “no pressure, no blackmail.” They don’t even know what you people are talking about. It’s a ph- — it’s a hoax. It’s a hoax. It’s just a continuation of the Russian witch hunt, which turned out to be phony. The Mueller deal was phony. And now they have this.

And all it is, is very simple: It’s one conversation that I had with the President of Ukraine that was perfect. That Adam Schiff defrauded everybody and he made up the conversation in the halls of Congress.

Q Are you at all concerned about the growing criminal investigation into Rudy Giuliani?

THE PRESIDENT: I don’t think so, because I think Rudy is a great gentleman. He’s been a great crime fighter. He looks for corruption wherever he goes. Everybody understands Ukraine has big problems in that regard. Rudy Giuliani is a fine man. He was the greatest mayor in the history of New York, and he’s been one of the greatest crime fighters and corruption fighters. Rudy Giuliani is a good man.

Q Would you like to see your Justice Department still investigate Biden? Should the Justice Department still be investigating Biden?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think what Biden did, and his son — and now, I guess, they’re finding also Romania; that just came out today. Or some other country. And I’m sure there are more than that.

When a man walks away — who has no talent, no skill, no experience — with $1.5 billion out of China; when he walks away with $168,000 a month for him and his friend, from Ukraine, when Ukraine supposedly gave him $3 million — whatever the numbers are — and he’s got no experience in oil and no experience anywhere, and now other nations are coming out. I heard one today; I won’t embarrass the nation.

All he’s doing — and in my opinion, that’s a payoff, because you don’t pay that kind of money for any other reason. And then you look at what the father did with oil, and “let’s get oil.” And then, all of a sudden, “let’s not get oil.” And now he’s a great environmentalist, because the Ukraine benefits by that, and other places benefit by that.

No, I consider what they did to be an outrage to our country. I consider that to be an outrage to our country.

Q Mr. President, what do you think about Lindsey Graham’s resolution? Some of your supporters think he’s not doing enough. And also, what do you think about the nine GOP senators who didn’t sign on to that resolution against impeachment?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, some of them weren’t even spoken to yet. They got 40 very quickly. I think they’re at 47. And some of them haven’t even — don’t even know about it yet. It only took place yesterday afternoon.

So they had a great response. No, you have — we have great — great support. We had 185 out of 185 the other night — the Republican congressmen. I think we had 185 present and we had 185 positive votes. And with the senators we’re doing great too.

Q Where are we on the China and U.S. deal — trade deal?

THE PRESIDENT: We’re doing very well with China. We’re moving along nicely. We’re dealing with them right now. And a lot of good things are happening with China. They want to make a deal very badly.

Q What is in your new plan for Afghanistan?

THE PRESIDENT: What?

Q What is in your new plan for Afghanistan? Are you able to —

THE PRESIDENT: We’ve moving with Afghanistan. We’re doing well in Afghanistan. We’re slowly bringing things down to a certain level. But we’re doing very well with Afghanistan. Things are moving along.

Q Your top diplomat in Ukraine said that you held up military funds because you wanted Ukraine to investigate the 2016 election and Burisma, the company on which Hunter Biden sat. Are you saying that he’s making that up?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, the problem is — here’s the problem —

Q Do you think — are you calling him a liar?

THE PRESIDENT: Here’s the problem: He’s a Never Trumper, and his lawyer is a Never Trumper. And the other problem is you —

Q Mike Pompeo hired him.

Q Why did Mike Pompeo hire him?

THE PRESIDENT: Hey, everybody makes mistakes. I — Mike Pompeo, everybody makes mistakes.

Q Do you want him out now as the top diplomat?

THE PRESIDENT: He’s a Never Trumper. His lawyer is the head of the Never Trumpers. They’re a dying breed, but they’re still there.

Q Based on what?

THE PRESIDENT: And here’s the other problem —

Q Based on what, Mr. President?

THE PRESIDENT: — you’re with CNN and you’re fake news.

Q Mr. President, on guns: This month is nearly a year since the shooting in Pennsylvania.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, the Democrats don’t have any time to work on anything. They have to do US — USMCA. They have to do guns. They have to do — they have many things. We want to reduce drug prices even more. You know, we can go so far, but we could get drug prices substantially reduced. The Democrats — the Do-Nothing Democrats have no time to do it.

Q Do you — will you support the Republican plan that came out this week? It expands access to healthcare.

THE PRESIDENT: Which one?

Q The Republican plan that came out this week. Do you support that?

THE PRESIDENT: We have a great Republican plan. And if we take over the House, which we should — especially because of what they’re doing with impeachment — I think we’ll take over the House by big numbers. You’ll have healthcare the likes of which you’ve never seen. Much less expensive. Deductibles will be much lower. You’ll have great healthcare. We have to take over the —

Q But will we see gun legislation?

THE PRESIDENT: Because the Democrats don’t have any time to do anything.

Q Sir, Vice President Pence said, yesterday, that America stands with the protestors in Hong Kong who are protesting against the Beijing government. Do you agree with that, sir?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I know he made the speech yesterday. I went over the speech. The speech was fine. It was fine.

Q Does America —

THE PRESIDENT: No, his speech was fine.

Q — stand with the protestors?

THE PRESIDENT: But I’m also working very closely with China on a deal. But his speech was fine.

Q Mr. President, are you trying to intimidate the whistleblower?

Q On the deal — on the deal with China, Lighthizer says you are — Lighthizer says you are close to finalizing some sections on the deal with China.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s true.

Q What sections? Is it intellectual property?

THE PRESIDENT: We’re doing very well with China. We’re very good with the farmers. The farmers are going to do better, maybe, than anybody. But everybody is doing well.

China wants to make a deal. They’d like to see some reductions in tariffs. They’d like to see some tariffs that are scheduled to go on very soon — they’d like to see them not go on. But China — they really — look, you know it: They really want to make a deal. They’re going to be buying much more farm product than anybody ever thought possible.

Q Are you confident that you have the votes in the Senate, if an impeachment goes there?

THE PRESIDENT: Only for one reason: I did nothing wrong. The only reason. I had a perfect conversation with the President of Ukraine. Perfect. Had they seen that conversation before they made up the story — they made up the story about that conve- — had they seen it, we wouldn’t even be talking about it right now. The conversation has been perfect. And for that reason, I have tremendous support.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. With the opening of the investigations that your Attorney General, William Barr —

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah.

Q — is (inaudible), is this because people who are investigating you are, in fact, engaging in criminal conduct?

THE PRESIDENT: So they’ve started, and it’s been going on a long time. And I sort of semi-read the papers. And I read them probably in greater detail than you, actually. And I try and sift out the fake news from the real news.

But, as you know, there’s been a long-term look at — look-see — and it looks like it’s becoming very serious, from what I’m hearing. Investigate the investigator — whether it’s Strzok and Page, whether it’s Clapper, and whether it’s Comey, and all of these people — because terrible things went on for our country.

And we have a great Attorney General — a highly prestigious man, a very honorable man. And they’ve been looking at it for a long time.

I can’t tell you what’s happening. I will tell you this: I think you’re going to see a lot of really bad things. And a lot of people think that — and they know they have problems because they were very dishonest. And, again, I leave it all up the Attorney General and I leave it all up to the people that are working with the Attorney General who I don’t know.

But I will say this: I think you’ll see things that nobody would’ve believed. This was the worst hoax in the history of our country. And a lot of people say that the phony deal on impeachment, where I have a perfect conversation — perfect — with the President of Ukraine — and they’re using that to impeach one of the most successful Presidents.

We’re going to hit another stock market high. We have the best jobs report. We have the best unemployment numbers. We have the best employment. More people working today in the United States than ever before. I’ve rebuilt the military. We’re strong. We just did a great thing in Syria where we’re getting our troops out. We took over oil. A lot of great things are happening in this country.

I will say this: If anything ever happened with this phony witch hunt that the Democrats are doing — the Do-Nothing Democrats — I really believe that you’d have a recession- depression the likes of which this country hasn’t seen.

Now, a strong statement was made by a very highly respected man this morning on Wall Street — a man who is very respected — about that, that if anything happened to Trump — President Trump — you would see repercussions in the market like you haven’t seen before.

But here’s the thing: I don’t have teams. Everyone is talking about teams. I’m the team. I did nothing wrong. This has been going on for — before I got elected. This was going on from the insurance policy — Strzok and his lover, Page. This was the insurance policy. It was Strzok and Page. We did nothing wrong. But Strzok said, “Oh, she’s going to win. She’s going to win. But if she doesn’t, we have an insurance policy.”

So — so, let me just tell you something. So, this has been going on since before I got elected. And people are angry about it. And do you know who’s angry about it? The Republican Party is angry about it because this isn’t a takedown of the President, this is a takedown of the Republican Party. And, frankly, the Democrats should be ashamed of themselves.

Q (Inaudible) cost of South Korean defense sharing (inaudible)?

Q Mr. President, you tweeted about Never Trumpers the other day. You have a few in your administration. Are you making personnel changes?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, if you let me who know who they are — who are they? Tell me. Tell me. Tell me.

Q I hear you have a list.

THE PRESIDENT: No, no. Tell me who the Never Trumpers are because I’m not a fan of the Never Trumpers.

We do have Never Trumpers. I’m not a fan. I think they’re bad people. Some have recovered. Okay? They went through, I guess, a recovery program. It’s called, “They learned how to win through me.” But others haven’t. I’m not a fan of Never Trumpers, and I never will be.

But a Never Trumper sometimes is more vicious than a failed Obama candidate or a failed Clinton candidate who I beat both in the same election with very little experience.

Don’t forget, I beat the Obama people. I beat the Bush people. And I beat the Clinton people. And I had no experience. That’s not a bad job. But there’s a lot of angry people out there. And that’s the way it goes. Thank you.

END 12:07 P.M. EDT

CNN, Including James Clapper, React to Durham “Review” Shifting to “Criminal Investigation”…


The reaction from CNN to news that U.S. Attorney John Durham is now conducting a criminal investigation is actually quite funny when contrast against their positions in 2017 and 2018.  Jeffrey Toobin doesn’t have any idea about the background of Joseph Mifsud, and his narration is a jumbled mess of dissonance: “clearly no evidence” he proclaims.

When Weissman and Mueller were traveling the world to investigate Trump-Russia it was an example of prudent and thorough investigative approaches.  However, Durham and Barr doing the same thing is an example of the most horrific investigation imaginable.  When Mueller sent a subpoena it held a seriousness that could not be ignored; however, if Durham sends a subpoena, everyone can just shrug-it-off and “take the fifth”.

Accordingly, Weissmann & Mueller opened investigations, the targets were automatically guilty and should be alarmed.  However, when Durham & Barr open investigations, it means nothing to the targets and not even the possibility of guilt.  Meanwhile, former ODNI James Clapper’s muttering responses are, well, also quite humorous. WATCH

BIG – Report: U.S. Attorney Durham “Administrative Review” is now “A Criminal Investigation”…


This would appear to be one of the few positive indicators that AG Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham are indeed doing more than bondo.  The New York Times is reporting the Durham “review” has now officially moved into a full “criminal investigation”.  [All emphasis mine]

WASHINGTON — For more than two years, President Trump has repeatedly attacked the Russia investigation, portraying it as a hoax and illegal even months after the special counsel closed it. Now, Mr. Trump’s own Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into how it all began.

Justice Department officials have shifted an administrative review of the Russia investigation closely overseen by Attorney General William P. Barr to a criminal inquiry, according to two people familiar with the matter. The move gives the prosecutor running it, John H. Durham, the power to subpoena for witness testimony and documents, to impanel a grand jury and to file criminal charges.

My initial question was/is: does this mean the *interviews* with John Brennan and James Clapper were predicated on a shift into a criminal investigation?  If yes, is that reality the baseline for the New York Times changing the reporting?

[…]  The move also creates an unusual situation in which the Justice Department is conducting a criminal investigation into itself.

Mr. Barr’s reliance on Mr. Durham, a widely respected and veteran prosecutor who has investigated C.I.A. torture and broken up Mafia rings, could help insulate the attorney general from accusations that he is doing the president’s bidding and putting politics above justice.

It was not clear what potential crime Mr. Durham is investigating, nor when the criminal investigation was prompted. A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment.

[…] Federal investigators need only a “reasonable indication” that a crime has been committed to open an investigation, a much lower standard than the probable cause required to obtain search warrants. However, “there must be an objective, factual basis for initiating the investigation; a mere hunch is insufficient,” according to Justice Department guidelines.

When Mr. Barr appointed Mr. Durham, the United States attorney in Connecticut, to lead the review, he had only the power to voluntarily question people and examine government files.

[…] Mr. Barr began the administrative review of the Russia investigation in May, saying that he had conversations with intelligence and law enforcement officials that led him to believe that the F.B.I. acted improperly, if not unlawfully.

The F.B.I. opened the investigation in late July 2016, code-named Crossfire Hurricane, after receiving information from the Australian government that a Trump campaign adviser had been approached with an offerof stolen emails that could damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

F.B.I. agents discovered the offer shortly after stolen Democratic emails were released, and the events, along with ties between other Trump advisers and Russia, set off fears that the Trump campaign was conspiring with Russia’s interference.

FBI agents “discovered the offer“?  Interesting use of words within the article by an outlet who sells the position of the DOJ and FBI.  The “offer” was from Joseph Mifsud, who we know is not a Russian intelligence operative, but rather now appears to be a western intelligence operative under the guiding control of the CIA.   The “discovery” part was the report of that activity by Australian diplomat Alexander Downer.

So what the New York Times is outlining here, is the CIA ran an operation using Mifsud to place information into Papadopoulos, a classic set-up, and the FBI is now claiming they had no idea the CIA was the originating intelligence apparatus for that information. Very interesting…. aligns with the FBI defensive framework from last week.

[…] The F.B.I. did not use information from the C.I.A. in opening the Russia investigation, former American officials said. But agents’ views on Russia’s election interference operation crystallized by mid-August, after the C.I.A. director at the time, John O. Brennan, shared intelligence with Mr. Comey about it.

Well the claim: “The F.B.I. did not use information from the C.I.A. in opening the Russia investigation” is demonstrably false.  The CIA produced an “electronic communication” (EC) to the FBI which officially launched the premise of operation “crossfire hurricane’.  That EC has never been released, though it has been seen by congressional investigators.  So whoever this “former American official” is, is lying.

[…]  The C.I.A. did contribute heavily to the intelligence community’s assessment in early 2017 that Russia interfered in the 2016 election and tried to tip it in Mr. Trump’s favor, and law enforcement officials later used those findings to bolster their application for a wiretap on a Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page.

As we have researched and outlined the CIA was the driving force behind the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) and Peter Strzok was one of the primary authors.   Additionally, how could the January 2017 ICA be used to bolster the application for the Carter Page FISA, when the FISA warrant was granted on October 21st, 2016?  Perhaps the New York Times is intentionally trying to conflate the ‘second renewal”?

Mr. Barr is closely managing the Durham investigation, even traveling to Italy to seek help from officials there to run down an unfounded conspiracy that is at the heart of conservatives’ attacks on the Russia investigation — that the Italian government helped set up the Trump campaign adviser who was told in 2016 that the Russians had damaging information that could hurt Clinton’s campaign.

But Italy’s intelligence services told Mr. Barr that they played no such role in the events leading to the Russia investigation, Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte of Italy said in a news conference on Wednesday. Mr. Barr has also contacted government officials in Britain and Australia about their roles in the early stages of the Russia investigation.

So the Italian intelligence apparatus played no “official” role; which again would bolster the likelihood the CIA was the driving entity behind Joseph Mifsud.

[…]  Mr. Durham has also asked whether C.I.A. officials might have somehow tricked the F.B.I. into opening the Russia investigation.

Mr. Durham has indicated he wants to interview former officials who ran the C.I.A. in 2016 but has yet to question either Mr. Brennan or James R. Clapper Jr., the former director of national intelligence.

The “tricked” by the CIA angle is a position seemingly outlined in many of the media defense articles on behalf of the FBI.

[…] Some C.I.A. officials have retained criminal lawyers in anticipation of being interviewed. It was not clear whether Mr. Durham was scrutinizing other former top intelligence officials. Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the former director of the National Security Agency, declined to say whether he had spoken with Mr. Durham’s investigators.

Mr. Durham also has yet to question many of the former F.B.I. officials involved in opening the Russia investigation.

I’d put that response from Admiral Mike Rogers in the affirmative side of the ledger; and again it’s good news the “small group” has yet to be interviewed.

[…] As Mr. Durham’s investigation moves forward, the Justice Department inspector general is wrapping up his own inquiry into aspects of the F.B.I.’s conduct in the early days of the Russia investigation. Among other things, the inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, is scrutinizing the application for a warrant to wiretap Mr. Page.

Mr. Barr has not said whether Mr. Durham’s investigation grew out of the inspector general’s findings or something that prosecutors unearthed while doing interviews or reviewing documents. But the inspector general’s findings, which are expected to be made public in coming weeks, could contribute to the public’s understanding of why Mr. Durham might want to investigate national security officials’ activities in 2016.

Though the inspector general’s report deals with sensitive information, Mr. Horowitz anticipates that little of it will be blacked out when he releases the document publicly, he wrote in a letter sent to lawmakers on Thursday and obtained by The New York Times.  (read full article)

Good News / Bad News – Horowitz Report: Likely No Classified Appendix / Review Phase Has Not Started…


A letter from DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz provides both good news and bad news.   The goods news is Horowitz letter says likely no need for a “classified version” which means AG Bill Barr likely declassifying a lot of it.

However, the bad news is on page #2 where Horowitz says the final draft assembly is still ongoing, and the “review phase” has not yet begun.  Which means the report is not likely to be made public before Thanksgiving.

Knowing how carefully the OIG chooses words when describing inter-agency discussions and contacts, a note of caution is also warranted for this part:

Instead of “redactions” and/or the need for a classified version (or appendix), the FBI process for a full release could also be requesting “removals”.

Lastly Horowitz notes the “review”, “accuracy” and “comment” period, which we customarily know as the “Principal Review Phase”, is not “anticipated to be lengthy”.  In general the principal review phase under Horowitz has been around two-to-three weeks.

During that phase the sections of the report that pertain to specific DOJ and FBI officials will be sent to them (w/ a required NDA) for review and their feedback.  The feedback may or may not be included in the final report as published.  If principal feedback is included, the IG will generally provide additional rebuttal evidence.

When the principals get their copies, despite the non-disclosure agreement, they will undoubtedly start leaking to their media allies and lawyers on their behalf will begin the process to undermine any damaging information within the report.

Based on today being October 24th, I wouldn’t look for the final report until after Thanksgiving.

Once the DOJ (Rosenstein and Mueller) made the 2018 intentional decision to cover-up the FISA leak by Senate Intelligence Committee Security Director, James Wolfe, they set themselves upon a path where truthful disclosures would be adverse to their interests.

Think about it….

Think about what would have happened in mid 2018 if the DOJ prosecuted James Wolfe for leaking the FISA application….  Think about what would have been revealed about the role of Glenn Simpson and Christopher Steele…  Think about how damaging that would have been to Robert Mueller…  Think about all the ramifications four months prior to the mid-term election.

Remember, Rod Rosenstein authorized the second Scope Memo in August 2017 specifically so Weissmann & Mueller could investigate the claims within the ‘Dossier’.  Think about what would have happened to the institution of the DOJ if they had proceeded with the prosecution of James Wolfe for leaking the FISA application; and all of the connections around the Steele Dossier and the FISA application came into light.

Don’t just do a cursory thinking about it, really think carefully about it.

Think about what would have happened to the SSCI and Mark Warner, if James Wolfe had been prosecuted….  Think about all of the April ’17 through 2018 media reporting on the FISA application; the Jan/Feb ’18 media arguments about the Nunes memo…. Think about every narrative the media was selling about the Steele Dossier and then later the FISA application….. and then think about Wolfe’s prosecution proving the media has the actual FISA application in their hands when they were writing all those false stories about it…

The ramifications of prosecuting Wolfe would have collapsed the entire Russian Collusion-Conspiracy narrative; and destroyed the reputations of the SSCI, the Mueller investigation, the DOJ, the FBI and the media.

Now do you see why they covered it up?

Once the DOJ and FBI leadership made the 2018 decision to cover-up the Wolfe leak of the FISA application, they set themselves on a path of no retreat and no return.

People often ask me why I changed my perspective in July/August 2018 and dropped the outlook of optimism toward accountability.  Well, there ya’ go. I just explained why.

Put on your memory cap and think about the downstream ramifications for prosecuting James Wolfe.  What would have changed?…..  EVERYTHING.

Now, think about the downstream ramifications from covering-up the Wolfe leak of the FISA application.  Think about all the officials who have first-hand knowledge they covered it up…. Think about the political participants that know the DOJ covered it up… Think about the FBI officials who investigated Wolfe, and who know their institutional leadership made the decision to cover-up what they found….

So what exactly will this same DOJ and FBI do in 2019 with an IG report that is specifically focused on the Carter Page FISA application?

Think about it carefully, and please share your thoughts.

[Here’s The Background]

Senator Lindsey Graham Introduces Resolution Condemning Pelosi/Schiff “Star-Chamber” Impeachment Fiasco…


Senator Lindsey Graham held a press conference to introduce a Senate Resolutioncondemning the House of Representatives’ closed-door impeachment investigation.

.

There are currently 46 Republican Senators supporting the Graham-McConnell resolution: 1.Graham 2.McConnell 3.Grassley 4.Thune 5.Blunt 6.Shelby 7.Inhofe 8.Roberts 9.Crapo 10.Cornyn 11.Burr 12.Barrasso 13.Wicker 14.Risch 15.Boozman 16.Moran 17.Toomey 18.Rubio 19.Paul 20.Hoeven 21.Lee 22.Johnson 23.Scott (SC) 24.Fischer 25.Cruz 26.Capito 27.Cassidy 28.Lankford 29.Cotton 30.Daines 31.Perdue 32.Ernst 33.Tillis 34.Rounds 35.Sasse 36.Young 37.Kennedy 38.Hyde-Smith 39.Blackburn 40.Cramer 41.McSally 42.Braun 43.Hawley 44.Scott (FL) 45.Portman and 46.Sullivan.

While the resolution [Text Available Here] is easily blocked by any democrat senator; what is important is to get senators on-the-record. This is an indicator of who will vote to impeach the President should articles ever reach the Senate.

There are 53 Republican Senators and 47 Democrats.  If your senator is not on the list supporting the Graham-McConnell resolution, it might be a good idea to STAND and demand to know why?

.

When we see that justice is measured, not by due process, but by compulsion; when we see that in order to invoke our right to due process, we need to obtain permission from those who rebuke the constitution; when we see that justice is determined by those who leverage, not in law, but in politics; when we see that representatives get power over individual liberty by graft and by scheme, and our representatives don’t protect us against them, but protect them against us; when we see corruption holding influence and individual liberty so easily dispatched and nullified; we may well know that our freedom too is soon to perish….

As we bear witness, anyone trying to convince us this entire assembly of our union is headed in the right direction, well, they might want to revisit their proximity to the 2020 election ballpark. Because they’re not just out of the city – they’re also out of the same state the election ballpark is located in….. Then again, the media know that.

David Mamet had a famous saying, essentially: …‘in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things’… By pretending ‘not to know’ there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.

This hate-filled Democrat ideology relies on our willingness to accept their lies, falsehoods, and scripted presentations; and then demands we grant benefit amid their seeds of doubt.

There’s a level of anger far deeper and more consequential than expressed rage or visible behavior, it’s called Cold Anger.

Cold Anger does not need to go to violence. For those who carry it, no conversation is needed when we meet. You cannot poll or measure it; specifically because most who carry it avoid discussion… And that decision has nothing whatsoever to do with any form of correctness.

We watched the passage of Obamacare at 1:38am on the day before Christmas Eve in 2009. We watched the Senate, then the House attempt passing Amnesty in 2014. We know exactly how it passed, and we know exactly why it passed. We don’t need to stand around talking about it….

We know what lies hidden behind “cloture” and the UniParty schemes.

We watched the 2009 $900+ billion Stimulus Bill being spent each year, every year, for seven consecutive years. Omnibus, Porkulous, QE1, QE2, Bailouts, Crony-Capitalism. We know exactly how this works, and we know exactly why this ruse is maintained. We don’t need to stand around talking about it…. We’re beyond talking.

We accept that the entire Senate voted to block President Trump’s ability to use recess appointments in 2017, and 2018, and 2019. Every.Single.Democrat.And.Republican.

Cold Anger absorbs betrayal silently, often prudently.

We’ve waited each year, every year, for ten years, to see a federal budget, only to be given another Omnibus spending bill by “CONservative” politicians.

We’ve watched the ridiculing of cops, the riots, and the lack of support for laws, or their enforcement. We’ve been absorbing all that. We’ve been exposed to violence upon us by paid operatives of the organized DNC machine. We know; the media trying to hide it doesn’t change our level of information.

Cold Anger is not hatred, it is far more purposeful.

We watched in 2012 as the Democrat party thrice denied God during their convention. The doors to evil enterprise opened by official proclamation and request.

Cold Anger takes notice of the liars, even from a great distance – seemingly invisible to the mob. Cold Anger will still hold open the door for the riot goer. Mannerly.

We’ve watched our borders being intentionally unsecured.

We’ve watched Islamic Terrorists slaughter Americans as our politicians proclaim their uncertainty of motive. We know exactly who they are, and why they are doing it. We do not need to stand around discussing it…. we’re clear eyed.

Cold Anger evidenced is more severe because it is more strategic, and more purposeful. Eric Cantor’s defeat, Matt Bevin’s victory, Brexit, Donald Trump’s highest vote tally in the history of presidential primaries or President Trump’s 2016 victory might aide your  understanding.

Cold Anger does not gloat; it absorbs consistent vilification and ridicule as fuel. This sensibility does not want to exist, it is forced to exist in otherwise unwilling hosts – we also refuse to be destabilized by it.

Transgender bathrooms are more important than border security.

Illicit trade schemes, employment and the standard of living in Vietnam and Southeast Asia are more important to Wall Street and DC lobbyists, than the financial security of Youngstown Ohio.

We get it.

We understand.

We didn’t create that reality, we are simply responding to it.

The intelligence apparatus of our nation was weaponized against our candidate by those who controlled the levers of government. Now, with sanctimonious declarations they dismiss accountability.

Deliberate intent and prudence ensures we avoid failure. The course, is thoughtful vigilance; it is a strategy devoid of emotion. The media can call us anything they want, it really doesn’t matter…. we’re far beyond the place where labels matter.

Foolishness and betrayal of our nation have served to reveal dangers within our present condition. Misplaced corrective action, regardless of intent, is neither safe nor wise. We know exactly who Donald Trump is, and we also know what he is not. He is exactly what we need at this moment. He is a necessary glorious bastard.

He is our weapon.

Cold Anger is not driven to act in spite of itself; it drives a reckoning.

When the well attired leave the checkout line carrying steaks and shrimp using an EBT card, the door is still held open; yet notations necessarily embed.

When the U.S. flags lay gleefully undefended, they do not lay unnoticed. When the stars and stripes are controversial, yet a foreign flag is honored – we are paying attention.

When millionaire football players kneel down rather than honor our fallen soldiers and stand proud of our country, we see that. Check the NFL TV ratings – take note.

When a school community cannot openly pray, it does not mean the prayerful were absent.

When a liar seems to win, it is not without observation. Many – more than the minority would like to admit – know the difference between science, clocks and political agendas.

Cold Anger perceives deception the way the long-term battered absorb a blow in the hours prior to the pre-planned exit; with purpose.

A shield, or cry of micro-aggression will provide no benefit, nor quarter. Delicate sensibilities are dispatched like a feather in a hurricane.

We are patient, but also purposeful. Pushed far enough, decisions are reached.

[…] On the drive to and from the East Coast, I paid attention to the billboards and bumper-stickers. Folks, the people in “Fly over” country are PISSED, from the guy that guides hunters, to the mayors of towns and cities, to state senators congressmen and Governors who are voting to arrest and imprison federal law enforcement officials for enforcing federal gun laws that don’t agree with state law … The political pendulum has never, in the history of humanity, stayed on one side of a swing. The back lash from over reach has always been proportionate to how far off center it went before coming back … right now we’re staring at a whole hell of a lot of the country (about 80-90% of the land mass, as well as about 50+% of the population) that is FED UP. You really don’t want those guys to decide that the only way to fix it is to burn it down and start over… (more)

It’s too late…

This man has faced opposition that would overwhelm any other President.  Our chosen President is constantly attacked by those holding a corrupt, conniving and Godless leftist ideology.  It is our job now to stand with him, firm on his behalf.

To respond we must engage as an insurgency. We must modify our disposition to think like an insurgent. Insurgencies have nothing to lose. If insurgents are not victorious the system, which controls the dynamic, wins. However, if insurgents do nothing, the same system, which controls the dynamic, also wins.

Do nothing and we lose. Go to the mattresses, and we might win.

The choice is ours.

The awakened American middle-class insurgency, led by Donald Trump, is an existential threat to the professional political class and every entity who lives in/around the professional political class. Their entire political apparatus is threatened by our insurgency. The political industry, all of corrupt governance, is threatened by our support through Donald Trump.

Decision time.

You know why the entire apparatus is united against President Trump. You know why the corrupt Wall Street financial apparatus is united against President Trump. You know why every institutional department, every lobbyist, every K-Street dweller, every career legislative member, staffer, and the various downstream economic benefactors, including the corporate media, all of it – all the above, are united against Donald Trump.

Donald Trump is an existential threat to the existence of a corrupt DC system we have exposed to his disinfecting sunlight. Donald Trump is the existential threat to every entity who benefits from that corrupt and vile system.