Kamala Harris Needs Teleprompter During Senate SCOTUS Hearing…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 12, 2020 by sundance

Senator Kamala Harris chose to remain in her office just down the hall from the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing today.  Oddly during her segment to deliver prepared remarks she relied on a teleprompter for the broadcast.   Senator Harris does not use a teleprompter well, and the effort was transparent.  Watch:

This is an example of how/why the DNC club control agents are pressuring for virtual debates.  Everything about the Harris-Biden ticket is a Potemkin village; both candidates are avatars, puppets, for the big club control agents behind the curtain.

Day #1 Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing – SCOTUS Nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett – 9:00am ET Livestream…


Posted originally on The Conservative tree house on October 12, 2020 by sundance

The Senate Judiciary Committee will hear opening statements today regarding Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court. Judge Barrett will be introduced by U.S. Senator Todd Young, Indiana; U.S. Senator Michael Braun, Indiana; and Professor Patricia O’Hara from Notre Dame Law School. Anticipated Start Time 9:00am EDT

Day #1 hearing concludes at 2:15pm EDT

Death By Idea!


There was a recent ‘patriot rally’ in Denver. Early reports claim Matthew Dolloff was hired as a security guard for a Denver TV station that was covering the event. An altercation took place between Dolloff and a Trump supporter. My guess is they exchanged some cross words and it escalated to a slap and a shove, followed by the victim spraying mace at Dolloff. Nearly in the same instant, Dolloff pulled a pistol and shot his adversary dead on the spot. Dolloff wasn’t wearing a guard uniform, nor was it obvious he was packing.

As it turns out, Dolloff was neither licensed nor qualified to be a security guard. He probably wasn’t licensed for concealed carry. We saw that Dolloff was sporting a ‘Space Invaders’ tattoo on his right wrist. Such a marking is associated with Antifa. He was a Bernie supporter and registered Democrat Socialist. The leftist mass media came out and said Dolloff was not associated with Antifa, but we’re now learning this may not be true. The lying media jumps to too many conclusions that align with their political agenda. For example, they blamed Trump for inspiring the conspirators who wanted to kidnap Michigan’s Governor Whitmer, when several in the conspiracy did not support the president and sympathized with the radical left.

Joe Biden does not want to lose his progressive, far-left Antifa supporters. He recently deflected criticism aimed at the Antifa and said it was an idea and not an organization. It is indeed an organization, if loosely-knit, and many of its followers are not afraid to commit acts of violence. The corrupt mass media continually gives them a pass and refers to them as ‘peaceful protestors.’ It will be difficult for them to justify the shooting of someone on the right, but they’ll try. I wouldn’t be surprised if Dolloff is released. One has to wonder what would be happening right now had Dolloff been a Trump supporter and his victim a black ‘BLM’ member.

FBI Director Chris Wray also stated that antifa is an ideology, not an organization…thereby contradicting President Trump who wanted it designated as a terrorist organization. Wray is a Deep State operative and should be fired.

As for Biden, he needs to be defeated.

—Ben Garrison

The Debate Is Over About The Biased Commission


Moderators are biased, distracting, and unnecessary. After the disastrous results of the 2020 debates, this kind of unwelcome interference can no longer be tolerated. The Republican presidential candidates deserve better, but, more importantly, so do

Jeff Crouere image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Jeff Crouere —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 11, 2020

Commission on Presidential DebatesEver since the formation of the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) in 1987, there has been incredible bias against Republican candidates. The moderators and format have always favored the Democratic presidential candidates. Thus, it has been incredibly foolish for GOP presidential candidates to agree to participate in such an unfair process.

Once again, this year, the Trump campaign allowed the CPD to schedule and organize four debates, three involving the presidential candidates and one featuring the vice-presidential candidates. Not surprisingly, all the moderators selected were unabashed liberals.

The first presidential debate was a fiasco

The first presidential debate was a fiasco. It was moderated by the long-time liberal Fox News anchor Chris Wallace. He embarrassed himself with a stunningly biased performance. He interrupted President Donald Trump 76 times, as opposed to only 15 interruptions of former Vice President Joe Biden. The questions were slanted towards Biden and the only tough questions were directed at President Trump.

llace interjected almost every talking point for the Democrats. He asked about old issues such as the 2017 Charlottesville, VA rally and demanded that the President once again condemn white supremacists. Even though all the riots in 2020 were led by radical leftist organizations like Antifa and Black Lives Matter, Wallace was uninterested in discussing it.

Instead, he wanted to explore issues such as Covid-19, climate change, and anything that could possibly be detrimental to President Trump. Of course, Biden received a pass on his son’s questionable consulting contracts, his interference in prosecutions in Ukraine, his friendship with white supremacist Democrats in the United States Senate, his “manifesto” with radical socialists in the Democratic Party, his constant flip-flopping, his lack of law enforcement endorsements and his delay in condemning the Antifa riots.

The vice-presidential debate was not much better as liberal moderator Susan Page of USA Today showed her bias with her questions and her treatment of the two candidates.

The next presidential debate was supposed to be moderated by liberal Steve Scully of C-SPAN. Yet, his ideological preferences are easy to determine by looking at his resume. Scully once served as an intern to Biden when he was a U.S. Senator representing Delaware and was a staff assistant to former U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA). Clearly, his work for two liberal United States Senators shows that Scully is not impartial.https://lockerdome.com/lad/11136804967644006?pubid=ld-11136804967644006-671&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fcanadafreepress.com&rid=canadafreepress.com&width=336

Thankfully, the second Trump-Biden debate has been canceled

He also was pictured at the “Biden Beach Bash ‘16” with his arm around the former Vice President, tweeting “Gotta love the @VP.” This week, it was reported that Scully sent a tweet to Trump hater Anthony Scaramucci asking him how to respond to the President. While Scully claimed his Twitter account was hacked, an FBI investigation is not needed to determine his clear bias.

Thankfully, the second Trump-Biden debate has been canceled. The President rightfully declined to participate in a virtual debate, which was unilaterally announced by the CPD without consultation with either candidate. The CPD was supposedly worried about exposing the debate audience and the staff to President Trump, who has recovered from Covid-19. Despite the President’s doctors clearing the President to participate in events and his lack of symptoms, the CPD wanted to force a virtual debate on the American people.

Such a debate would have been a joke. Biden would have had a teleprompter with coaching from his aides. The President would have had his microphone easily turned off and it would have been difficult to connect with a town hall audience.

Currently, there is one more Trump-Biden debate scheduled on October 22 in Nashville. Another liberal reporter, Kristen Welker of NBC News, was selected to serve as moderator. To prevent embarrassment, Welker has already erased her Twitter account, undoubtedly, to prevent her liberal tweets from being uncovered. If the debate occurs, she will show her bias against Trump with her questions and treatment of the candidates.

The President should probably participate because it will be an opportunity to reach a large group of voters. The first debate achieved an audience of 73.1 million Americans. The final debate may reach an even greater audience. In addition, the President is accustomed to battling multiple foes at one time. He did it during the 2016 debates and he does it every time he conducts a press conference.

Going forward, the problem with the CPD must be addressed. While it is advertised as being impartial, it is composed of Democrats and Trump-hating Republicans. This week, 1996 GOP presidential candidate, former U.S. Senator Bob Dole (R-KS), identified the real problem with the CPD. He tweeted, “The Commission on Presidential Debates is supposedly bipartisan w/ an equal number of Rs and Ds. I know all of the Republicans and most are friends of mine. I am concerned that none of them support @realDonaldTrump. A biased Debate Commission is unfair.”

Well done Bob Dole! The CPD is totally unfair and should be scrapped. If it refuses to disband, the GOP should disavow any future affiliation and withdraw from working with the CPD, a total sham of an organization.

Future presidential debates do not need a liberal moderator pretending to be fair, but truly working in a feverish manner to help the Democratic nominee. Both candidates should participate in a Lincoln/Douglas style debate with equal time for each of them.

Moderators are biased, distracting, and unnecessary. After the disastrous results of the 2020 debates, this kind of unwelcome interference can no longer be tolerated. The Republican presidential candidates deserve better, but, more importantly, so do the voters of America.

Alarm bells sounding for Biden, Schumer and Pelosi


The messages being delivered by the voters are sounding the alarm bells for Biden, Schumer and Pelosi but they are apparently not listening

David Singer image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By David Singer —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 11, 2020

Cover Story | 3 Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to FlipboardShare to PrintShare to EmailShare to More11

Alarm bells sounding for Biden, Schumer and PelosiBeware those polls predicting a Biden win and the Democrats gaining control of the Congress—rather than those polls seeking answers to specific issues which indicate a Trump win and Republican control of the Congress more likely.

The responses to three questions asked in the September 14-28 Gallup poll should concern Biden.

Gallup Poll

  • On the question of “personality and leadership qualities a president should have”:

    Not unexpected.

    President Trump is a businessman and a deal maker—not a career politician like his opponent Joe Biden. Trump runs the country like a big business. The speed and frequency of his decisions contrast with the slow and ponderous ways of the Washington bureaucracy and previous Presidents.

    Two examples: 
    1. Closing America’s borders on January 31, 2020 to flights emanating from China—to arrest the spread of Covid 19—Biden accusing Trump that same day of “hysterical xenophobia—and fearmongering to lead the way instead of science.”
    2. Opening the American Embassy in Jerusalem on May 14, 2018—when all Presidents before him failed to do so after the Jerusalem Embassy Act 1995—adopted by the Senate (93–5), and the House (374–37)—had specifically given them that authority.  
  • On the question of “agree or disagree with (Donald Trump/Joe Biden) on the issues that matter to you most”:

    This result is bad news for Biden/ Democratic Party camp. 

    Trump’s lack of personality and leadership qualities as a president has not stopped a majority of the responders acknowledging Trump has handled issues of concern to them to their satisfaction. Voters will forgive Trump’s personal Presidential failings because he cares more about their issues than a Presidential-looking Biden.

A Biden win looks increasingly unlikely after voters were asked: “Whether They’re Better Or Worse Off Than Four Years Ago”. (See following window)

Gallup Poll
  • 56% consider themselves better off in 2020 than in 2016—after Biden had then been their Vice President for the previous 8 years. 
  • The responders had lived through the unprecedented Covid 19 pandemic for nine months that had threatened to destroy their own hopes and dreams of being better off than four years ago. 

Statista’s poll has ominous consequences for Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi regarding the elections for Congress—the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Statista puts the disapproval rating of the United States Congress at 80%—the highest disapproval rating in the past 12 months (See following Window):

Statista

It should be noted this 80% disapproval rate:

  • increased from 68% in December 2019—when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was still considering whether to impeach President Trump on charges of abuse of power and obstruction—to 74% in February 2020 after Trump had been found not guilty by the Senate
  • is likely to shoot even higher as: 
    1. the Senate begins its confirmation hearings into appointing Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court—which the Democrats will oppose 
    2. Pelosi moves to establish a process to effectively give Congress a say in removing a president from office under the 25th Amendment of the Constitution—which the Republicans will oppose 
    3. Trumps’ offer of $1.8 trillion in a renewed search for an economic relief deal is being rejected by Pelosi
    4. Senate Minority leader Schumer threatens to replace the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court and create two new states Puerto Rico and Washington DC. 

Biden’s accomplishments over 47 years—8 as Vice President—pale in comparison to what Trump has achieved in 4 years

The messages being delivered by the voters are sounding the alarm bells for Biden, Schumer and Pelosi but they are apparently not listening. 

Interesting Biden Campaign Video from Arizona – Something is Curiously Absent…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree house on October 11, 2020 by sundance

That something is supporters.

As you watch this local media report of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris campaigning in Arizona most are focused on the complete absence of any support for the candidates; indeed, that is a rather weird fact.  However, additionally watch in the video how the campaign staff has placed markers on the ground as visible cues for Biden, Harris and McCain to walk with social distancing; and pay particular attention to how Biden attempts to navigate his proximity responsibility therein.  

.https://www.youtube.com/embed/OKCJXb0pjaY

Apparently this big push using Cindy McCain fell exceptionally flat. No-one cares… but the scale of the campaign being managed by poll-testers and control agents is really something; even beyond what we witnessed in 2016.

Sunday Talks – Lindsey Graham Outlines ACB Confirmation Hearing Schedule…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 11, 2020 by sundance

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (an ICI member) appears on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the upcoming committee hearing schedule for the senate confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett.

Sunday Talks – Former ODNI Ric Grenell: President Trump’s Cabinet and Inspectors General Need to Get Focused…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 11, 2020 by sundance

I do not blame a single voter for tuning out this type of political messaging… At this point the people defined as “patriots” sound like Charlie Brown’s teacher echoing in a forest.  There is a simple issue that everyone, including Ric Grenell, avoid because they worry  about their own financial interests and ongoing image.

That issue is an admission that *CURRENT* cabinet members, *CURRENT* officials, *Current* republicans in congress, and *CURRENT* inspectors’ general, are participants in the attempted overthrow of the United States office of the presidency.

Unless and until that reality is admitted, all these words are barking at trees

The office of the president is trapped on the roof.  The firefighters set the blaze.  The firefighters are the arsonists.  The municipal fire hydrants are filled with gasoline.

There are no “honorable rank-and-file” in/around Washington DC. There are no DC interests, including conservatives within the DC media apparatus, willing to participate in the disassembly of the institutional DC system of politics.  That system is their livelihood.

Share this:

Here’s How President Trump Can Declassify Documents Around the “Authorization Process”…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 11, 2020 by sundance

Dear Mr. President and White House counsel:

Understanding the ordinary process of declassifying documents is a request and authorization to the executive officers and stakeholders of classified information; and understanding the current authorization is is not ordinary because the intelligence community stakeholders are adverse to the interests of the office of the president; here is a process to cut through the chaff and countermeasures.

The background here is that any unilateral declassification request, demand or authorization by President Trump puts him opposition to a variety of corrupt interests.

As a direct result the executive office of the president will be facing legal action, likely from unified democrats and republicans in the legislative branch.  With that accepted, here is the most strategic approach.

In anticipation of litigation:

President Trump informs the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe, that he wishes to have a full intelligence briefing on the following documents (more may be added), all documents are to be presented without a single redaction:

  • All versions of the Carter Page FISA applications (DOJ) (FBI) (ODNI).
  • All of the Bruce Ohr 302’s filled out by the FBI. (FBI) (ODNI)
  • All of Bruce Ohr’s emails (FBI) (DOJ) (CIA) (ODNI)
  • All relevant documents pertaining to the supportive material within the FISA application. (FBI) (DOJ-NSD ) (DoS) (CIA) (DNI) (NSA) (ODNI);
  • All supportive documents and material provided by Bruce Ohr to the FBI. (FBI)
  • All intelligence documents that were presented to the Gang of Eight in 2016 that pertain to the FISA application used against U.S. person Carter Page; including all intelligence documents that may not have been presented to the FISA Court. (CIA) (FBI) (DOJ) (ODNI) (DoS) (NSA)
  • All unredacted text messages and email content between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok on all devices. (FBI) (DOJ) (DOJ-NSD) (ODNI)
  • The originating CIA “EC” or two-page electronic communication from former FBI Agent Peter Strzok: and all communication between former CIA Director John Brennan and FBI Director James Comey that started Operation Crossfire Hurricane in July 2016. (CIA) (FBI) (ODNI)
  • The full and unredacted April 2017 FISA court 99-page opinion written by Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer outlining the compliance audit conducted by the NSA in 2016. (NSA) (ODNI) (DOJ) (FBI) (DOJ-NSD)

The President selects a date for this briefing and through direct orders to his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, informs the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe, to advise and coordinate with all executive branch lead intelligence officials, who were/are stakeholders in the compartmented intelligence products as described above, of their request be present for the briefing.

The White House counsel’s office is not to be informed of the intent or purpose of the meeting; however the Presidents’ White House counsel is requested to attend. Further, all of the compartmented intelligence is to be collectively assembled by the ODNI (Ratcliffe) into one volume of a singular Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB). There are to be eighteen printed copies of the PDB assembled and secured for the briefing, post haste.

Additionally, the office of the president personally informs the ODNI (Ratcliffe) of the executives’ request to invite for the briefing each member of the legislative branch Intelligence Community oversight known as the Gang-of-Eight.

Immediately after the briefing by the executive level (cabinet) department officials, while remaining in a closed and classified session, the full and comprehensive content of this collective intelligence product will be discussed with the full assembly of the U.S. Legislative Branch Intelligence Oversight known as the Gang of Eight.

Therefore, National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien is instructed to coordinate with the ODNI (Ratcliffe) for the attendance of the Gang of Eight: Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Minority leader Kevin McCarthy, HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff, HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, SSCI Chairman Richard Burr and SSCI Vice-Chair Mark Warner. [Topic “TBD”]

In order to facilitate the briefing. Each member of the participating group will be provided with one full printed copy of the material assembled by the ODNI during the briefing.

[Each of the participants carries the prerequisite clearances, legal and constitutional authority to engage with the classified document according to their position and status. Only the executive can assemble the product for Go8 review and feedback]

At the conclusion of the briefing; and after hearing from, and engagement with, each of the participating members of the executive intelligence offices and duly authorized legislative oversight representatives; and after listening to their opinion as to the subject material discussed; the president announces to the fully assembled leadership of both the Executive branch (cabinet) and Legislative branch (Go8), it is his opinion the National Interests of the United States can best be served with the American people having a full, transparent and honest review of the material assembled and discussed.

The President, no-one else, only the President, then collects the printed portfolios as they were distributed to the participants, exits the briefing, and walks directly into the James Brady press briefing room within the White House; handing each of the awaiting twelve members of the national media a copy of the briefing material to be published on behalf of the American people.

At exactly the same time as President Trump enters the briefing room, one copy of the assembled portfolio is hand delivered, by President Trump only, to White House communications director Alyssa Farah with instructions to scan and release the content to the public through the White House website.

Done.

The American people are aware…

The Election is forthcoming…

Litigation begins.

… “How does the office of a U.S. president; and more importantly the republic itself; survive a coordinated coup effort involving all three branches of government; while simultaneously those in charge of exposing the corruption fear the scale is too damaging for them to reveal?”…

It survives through the strength of the leader of the Republic to reveal it.

Trump to Donate His Plasma for Treatment of the Wuhan Virus


Trump promised to give the therapeutic Regeneron to Americans who come down with the Chinese COVID-19, and it’s all gonna be free.

Regeneron has created an amassing recovery for the president and he wants the CDC to create an Emergency Use directive to make it available to all with the virus. This dug is made from the plasma of volunteers and Trump has volunteered is Blood Plasma to the company. This is going to make it very difficult for Democrats to take the drug as there might be some of Trumps antibodies in it. So would a progressive, a Democrat, a never Trumper or any other person that hates Trump take this Drug?

Image copied from The Conservative Tree House

So what would you do if you had the virus and Trumps blood might save your life?