Living on the Edge


Posted originally on Apr 14, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Trade War 2

The U.S.-China trade war is an ongoing economic conflict that began in January 2018, characterized by the imposition of tariffs and trade barriers by both countries. Recently, tensions escalated as the U.S. raised tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%, prompting China to retaliate with tariffs of 125% on U.S. imports, affecting global supply chains and market stability.

Trump’s decision not to grant China the same reprieve as other nations explained: “China wants to make a deal, they just don’t know how quite to go about it.” I disagree. If I were China, I would do a full embargo, and the Achilles’ heel in this trade war is more than just the manufacture of values for municipalities – the big ones, steel and aluminum, but also medicines. Personally, I would put a full embargo on everything, and without the medicines, people would be screaming, and their lives would be put in danger. I have dealt with Asia for some 40 years. You do not do this sort of thing publicly. It is an insult and a loss of face that forces China not to yield.

The developing U.S.-China trade war keeps ratcheting up. China has suspended exports of rare earth minerals. Meanwhile, Commerce Secretary Lutnick said that the electronics the Trump administration exempted from reciprocal tariffs could be subject to different levies in the future. This is not good. You do not air your dirty laundry in public.

Beijing’s perspective is dramatically different. Xi Jinping has taken the view that his country would lose face if it simply capitulated to what it calls America’s “unilateral bullying.” The danger with this trade war is that publicly, it only supports fervent nationalism, and that feeds into what will become World War III. China has been quietly preparing for a trade war for quite some time. Trump’s actions may spark negotiation in Western circles, but in Asian circles, they create the image that the US doesn’t want to negotiate. My concern is that Xi is brilliant. This trade war is playing into his domestic approval of anti-Americanism. Like the Russian sanctions that boosted Putin’s approval rating calculation, sources say, China is also seeing a rise in popular support to strengthen its position by preparing not just to fight back. Trump’s trade war with China is definitely strengthening Xi’s own position.

Blinken_warns_China about sanction 4 26 24_over_support_for_Russia_s_war_efforts

All of my sources have said that Xi fully understands that China has entered a period of protracted struggle in both trade and geopolitics with the United States and Europe. This became painfully obvious, and Europe and the Biden Administration confronted Russia. Xi has taken the position that China needs to prepare for these confrontations ever since the Biden Administration put sanctions on Russia and then threatened China if it dared to help Russia. The Neocon Antony Blinken expressed “serious concern” about China’s support for Russia’s defense industry. He went as far as to threaten Xi that he would impose sanctions if China helped Russia.

BRICS 2

The Neocon Antony Blinken threw down the gauntlet and views the world only in his desire for imperial power. He never understood the economy, and this insanity of threatening China and removing Russia from Swift undermined the economy and split it in half, with the formation of BRICS for geopolitical security. I don’t believe Trump understands the damage that the Biden Administration inflicted upon the entire world. Now, go after China with a trade war to bring back manufacturing to America; this is pushing China over the edge.

China holding US Debt 4 11 25

China previously owned 10% of the US national debt. This is what Trump has not considered. Before this trade war began, in January, foreigners sold a net $13.3 billion of U.S. notes and bonds that had more than one year to maturity. As we approach sovereign debt defaults, I have warned that it may start with Japan and be followed by Europe. We saw almost $50 billion was sold in December 2024 in anticipation of a Trump trade war. Last November saw almost $35 billion dumped following the election.

Canada was the largest net seller in January. The UK needed the cash and was the biggest seller last December. I know some have made the outrageous claim that Japan sold US debt, and that made Trump pause the tariffs for 90 days. These people have ZERO understanding of the markets and even less about Trump. The tariffs over 10% are political, and it is part of his art of the deal. Japan is in economic trouble with its own debt crisis, and selling US debt had nothing to do with the tariffs – this is about creating a real debt crisis.

That said, China has the capacity to dump US debt in a big way, and that would send US rates higher on the long-end. U.S. stocks rallied with Trump pausing the tariffs, yet this was cyclically on point, which our computer had forecast months in advance. People just try to come up with some fundamentals to explain each move in a market, whether true or false. Our computer is projecting that 2025 will be the low in Chinese interest rates both on the 2-year and 30-year.

While stocks rallied, Treasury yields rose so much that lower rates benefited stocks. China has been quietly selling U.S. debt, which began over a year ago. This was not something new out of the blue in response to new tariffs. Bond markets were flashing warning signs based on the hidden risks behind the entire dynamics of trade and geopolitics.

Behind the scenes, U.S. Treasury yields have been rising during the overnight sessions, indicating foreign market selling. Nevertheless, the prospects of war in Europe are reflected in our models, for they do not support a collapse in the bond markets, implying that war will bring still capital inflows.

Baltic_Dry_Index Y Combined 4 11 25

When we look at the Baltic Freight Index, 2025 was a Double Directional Change, indicating that we would have this trade war. We have a Directional Change in 2026 and a Panic Cycle in 2027, with the culmination of this war extending into 2028. This might also be influenced by the war starting in Europe.

Interview: Martin Armstrong Reveals Insider Intel on Trump Tariff War


Posted originally on Apr 13, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Kinks – Living on a Thin Line


Posted originally on Apr 13, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Armstrong Interview on Pulse About Tariffs & Europe


Posted originally on Apr 12, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Categories:Armstrong in the Me

Interview: Tariffs and War


Posted originally on Apr 12, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

ActBlue Scandal – Democratic Party Funded by Fraud


Posted originally on Apr 11, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

ActBlue

ActBlue is a self-proclaimed grassroots fundraising platform for the Democratic Party. The Democrats want the public to believe that the everyday American fully supports them, but the truth has come to light after an ongoing investigation found that the organization has been upheld by dark money from both “foreign and domestic fraudulent actors.”

The House Judiciary Committee, the Committee on House Administration, and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released a joint interim staff report titled, “Fraud on ActBlue: How the Democrats’ Top Fundraising Platform Opens the Door for Illegal Election Contributions.” When the investigation began, seven senior staff members resigned from their positions. Every lawyer affiliated with the organization stepped away, further raising suspicions. ActBlue’s chief fraud-prevention specialist stated he was solely focused on DEI work even as he listed his top goal as “not allowing more than 10 [percent] additional missed fraud.”

Internal documents revealed that ActBlue lowered its standards for fraudulent donations twice ahead of the 2024 US elections. Instead of actively looking for fraud, employees were encouraged to be “more lenient” and actively “look for reasons to accept contributions.”

“Internal documents also indicate that there have been instances in which bad actors have fraudulently taken control of user accounts, giving them the ability to make straw donations appearing to be from regular donors,” the report noted. There were over 22 ongoing fraud campaigns to Democratic candidates, nine of which received donations from foreign actors.

ElizabethWarrenDonateCaliforniaWildfires

“Internal documents also indicate that there have been instances in which bad actors have fraudulently taken control of user accounts, giving them the ability to make straw donations appearing to be from regular donors,” the report stated. In a separate case, a Wisconsin Republican strategist claims ActBlue stole his identity to make 385 fraudulent donations on his behalf. “ ActBlue has even seen brazen instances of fraud in which multiple people have made donations using the same credit card information, and has internally acknowledged multiple incidents in which fraudulent donations evaded ActBlue’s automatic fraud review processes,” the report found.

One tactic used was collecting and saving card verification values (CVVs) for the first donation and using that information for recurring contributions. These contributions were found to amount to nearly half of all funding to ActBlue.

 ActBlue violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA). Enacted by President Nixon, FECA established regulations for campaign fundraising, spending, disclosures, and penalties for those in violation. The act has been amended numerous times, with the last amendment occurring in 2002 known as the McCain-Feingold Act. FECA bans foreign national from donating to US elections to prevent foreign interference. We heard the rumors of Russian collusion, but ActBlue openly accepted donations from foreign nations like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, India, Brazil, and Colombia.

ActBlue used straw donor schemes, also illegal under FECA, that permitted contributions under false names. There were even instances of identical small fonations occurring from the same day under different names, which points to bundling or automated donations that the individual may not have approved of.

FECA also establishes contribution caps and limits to prevent undue influence. The investigation found that donors bypassed this law by using prepaid cards or varying billing details. “Smurfing” practices, breaking large donations into a series of smaller donations, also occurred.

Transparency went out the window as the agency processed 1,900 flagged fraudulent transactions between 2020 and 2024. Employees were encouraged to accept every and any donation even if that meant turning a blind eye to fraud.

ActBlue is the Democratic Party’s main fundraising platform. These allegations seriously undermine the ethics of the Democratic Party in general. Charges have not been filed at the time of this writing but the agency could face a DOJ case, but since things are (D)ifferent, they may get a slap on the wrist with FEC fines.

The Netherlands Bans Free Journalism


Posted originally on Apr 11, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Free Speech in Europe

The Netherlands has changed its press directive to exclude non-accredited journalists from court hearings. Beginning on June 1, 2025, only members of ONE association, the Dutch Association of Journalists, will be able to create audiovisual reports of legal cases. This ensures that the government can control the media’s narrative as it spirals into the grips of war.

How does a journalist join the Dutch Association of Journalists? They must earn a specific amount of money from a predetermined list of media companies. Your livelihood must depend on reporting according to the government’s narrative if you want access to hearings. This is an all-out attack on free speech.

 Potkaars, who personally has interviewed me numerous times, was denied membership in 2021 as they were not beholden to a media mogul or corporation that has the government’s approval. They have filed numerous lawsuits against the government to no avail. If judges deviate from the press directive, the restriction had to be recorded in a register under the old press directive. Potkaars protested twice against the failure to register a decision and was proven right in both cases ( Court of Appeal in The Hague, Court of Appeal in Amsterdam ). Journalists may not appeal against a judge’s decision to deny them access. The updated terms will permit judges to restrict press access arbitrarily without reason.

The judiciary hired an association to carry out the accreditation process. They want journalists who abide by the Digital Services Act implemented by the European Union, which requires third-party media companies to censor “misinformation” on behalf of the government.

My source has told me that the Netherlands is training its military to recover body bags as part of an annual drill. This was not required training in previous annual exercises—the Dutch are preparing for war, and the government wants to silence free speech to prevent the public from knowing the truth.

It’s Just Time – the Last Frontier


Posted originally on Apr 11, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

student_answer_300_clr_705

COMMENT #1: Thank you for your private blog. I can see that the turning points laid out in Socrates are indeed pressure points that then cause people to react as Trump just did. You were right. The 7th held. These people get hysterical and blab out forecasts on emotions, as you said.

Thank you for the training.

WY

COMMENT #2: My Dear Mr. Armstrong much can be said and argue about these Tariffs you can write endless post about it but the bottom line is Trump and his advisors choose the WORST time in history ?to implement them -is like all hell broke loose !

Regular working class will pay the price already here in Ontario company are starting to fired people blaming guess who ? Unfortunately that how the game is play somebody has to be blame

You must be very busy ,but don’t neglect your well being please !

GR

ECM 2020 2028 R

REPLY: You are correct. We are all human and will respond to similar events in the same way and in the same amount of time, regardless of the country. The computer gave us the timing months in advance. The “fundamental” does not matter. My concern is that we are heading into a recession that started May 7th, 2024. I agree that the Democrats and media will blame Trump and his tariffs when this is part of the business cycle that will move into 2028. We are facing a sovereign debt crisis that will wipe out all debt by 2034.

Centralized Government

However, we are facing significant economic stress that pushes the Europeans to seek an external distraction, and that is Russia, to avoid dealing with the crumbling EU structure. They stripped Hungary of a right to vote and changed the rules that unanimous votes were necessary. Once you establish a centralized government,  they will always see more and more power. This is also why no government has ever survived long-term.

Thrasymachus Quote

Thrasymachus warned that JUSTICE is the same in every form of government – it is only the will of those in power. He said that more than 2000 years ago, and nothing has changed ever since. It is never a question of IF something will occur; it is merely a question of TIME – WHEN it will unfold. It is not a question of whether a society will rise against its oppressor; it is only a question of how much time it will require to move the majority of people to action. This is the same formula that governs when a market will crash. You may be able to raise your arm, but you cannot keep it up. You will run out of energy. So will markets or politics.

Rabbit Its Just Time

As I explained on the private blog, you can raise your arm but not keep it there. You will run out of energy, and it will become so heavy that you have to let it down. Markets are no different. As the white rabbit in Alice in Wonderland kept saying, “I’m late. I’m late.”

TIME last Frontier

It is the last frontier – It’s Just Time.

As Margaret Thatcher said at our World Economic Conference

Martin Armstrong Margaret Thatcher

Bloomberg Joins CNN, MSNBC & the Rest Fake News


Posted originally on Apr 10, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Supreme Court Contempt

COMMENT: I wanted to throw my two cents into this tariff mess. I have lost all respect for Bloomberg. They are the fake news. The political bias dominates all of their articles. I saw what they did to you and refused to ever publish the truth. They kept telling the world you were in contempt for $1 billion that was missing when it was $1.3 million, and never fessed up that the bank stole the money and had to plead guilty and repay your clients. The mere fact that you had no restitution said it all, yet they kept you in prison on civil contempt to turn over assets for something you never owed. They have covered stories of Trump with the same dishonesty. Pronouncing the NASDAQ was in a bear market, with the S&P 500 soon to follow, was the final straw.

Yesterday, they wrote that Donald Trump appeared to blink in the face of global, domestic, and perhaps most importantly, Wall Street fury at his single-handed destabilization of stock markets, bonds, and even oil prices. It was the press that caused the crash, not Trump. Everyone knows that Trump plays the art of the deal. The whole tactic was to create free trade. I agree, if Kamala had won, they would be blaming evil capitalists and Republicans, trying to make her look bad.

They have joined the leftist agenda of fake news. I cancelled my subscription.

BQ

Pittman Letter

REPLY: It is worse than that. Our reports used to be on Bloomberg. They deleted all of our previous reports. Mark Pittman had even written an article on what we were doing in Japan, buying distressed portfolios, and each transaction was approved by the Japanese Minister of Finance (MOF). When the charges were filed, I met Mark at the Hyatt by Grand Central Station. He knew the charges were false and said to me, “We are not going to let them do this to you.” Bloomberg removed Mark from ever covering anything about my story and deleted all the evidence that showed the charges were false.

Bloomberg crossed to the Dark Side.

Then again, it’s Hard to find Any Mainstream News That is not Fake Today

Fake News Headline

The Real Question is WHY have they become Fake News?

Bloomberg 1

Because Michael Bloomberg is a Democrat?

Or was it because he just protected the Bankers?

The Media Coup to Undermine Trump & Transform Republicans into Democrats


Posted originally on Apr 10, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

NASDAQ M 4 8 25

Bloomberg has actually come out as proclaimed: “With the Nasdaq 100 already in a bear market, soon it may be the S&P 500’s turn.” All we hear are hysterical forecasts, all emotionally charged because the number one thing they taught in economics class was the Democratic propaganda from the 1932 election – Tariffs & Protectionism caused the Great Depression, and Free Trade is prosperity. Bill Clinton tried that with China, and the Democrats cheered him. It expanded GDP, but it wiped out jobs and even whole towns in China.

Here is a meme on TikTok about making America Great Again. Is this our Competitive Advantage?

2020 _A_Bear_Market_Is_Not_Likely_In_The_Most_Hated_Bull_Market_In_History_Armstron
Armstrong Named Many Things
DeutscheBank 1

I have traded billions and advised on trillions. I managed the only onshore hedge fund for Deutsche Bank – here is the track record. My worst drawdown in a month was 0.41% – unmatched by anyone. I have been in the trenches and traded head-to-head with Soros, Bacon, Goldman Sachs, Phibro et al. I know why capital moves and have testified before the House Ways and Means Committee even on that subject. I do not speak from “theory” or “I think” bullshit from pretend analysts who are spouting out emotional forecasts which confirms that they are NOT an analyst. I have been named hedge fund manager of the year, FOREX Person of the Year, the discoverer of the Secret Cycle, and economist of the decade, among many other things – including the SOB by bankers, or alternatively that MFer.

OPINIONS

I am appalled by these people, who the media are parading on TV all hysterical, claiming tariffs will end the bull market if not civilization, and the media loves it because they get to hate Trump for something new, other than Putin’s Puppet or SIGNALgate that they can’t seem to get people interested in. Telling them they will lose everything in a 401K, there goes Social Security, and your house will fall to zero because you did not vote for Hillary or Kamala. While opinions make markets, as I have said countless times, the MAJORITY must always be wrong, for they provide the energy for the reversal of trend.

What is a Bear Market
1929 Crash the Bear Market Retest W

What Bloomberg reported was entirely LEFTIST propaganda. At the time, the NASDAQ had not even tested the basic uptrend line. Technically, you must break that line, stage a false move that retests that from beneath, and then it turns south again. To imply that the NASDAQ will continue to decline, it must close below 15200 on a monthly basis, raising the possibility of continuing down into May/June.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden said he will force a vote on repealing tariffs in a test of GOP political support for Trump’s trade war. There are the renegade Republicans who joined the Democrats, demonstrating that they believe the 1932 Democrats’ propaganda to win the 1932 election was utterly false. The rollout of Trump’s tariff strategy has sparked wide-ranging reactions from investors, manufacturers, small businesses, and consumers.

Congress enacted the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (RTAA) of 1934 which was a significant U.S. trade policy enacted during the Great Depression under President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal. The RTAA empowered the president to negotiate bilateral tariff-reduction agreements without requiring Congressional approval for each deal. This marked a shift from Congress’s traditional control over tariffs (e.g., the protectionist Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930). The Tariff reductions could be up to 50% of the existing rates.

Roosevelt, then, like Trump, engaged in Reciprocity Agreements that were based on mutual concessions, where the U.S. and partner countries agreed to lower tariffs on each other’s goods, boosting trade in theory, but it had little impact because consumers were not buying, staring at the uncertainty of the future. Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) Clause also took place with tariff reductions negotiated with one country being extended to all other trading partners with MFN status, preventing discrimination and broadening the impact of bilateral deals.

Galbraith Great Crash PNG

The Democrats had made such a big deal out of the tariffs, remaining dead silent on the Sovereign Debt Defaults, and that is what led to the propaganda we were taught in school that tariffs are bad and free trade is good. Aimed to reverse the trade-collapsing effects that they blamed on the Smoot-Hawley Act, which had exacerbated the Depression by sparking global tariff wars, they ignored the sovereign debt defaults that drove the dollar to record highs that made foreign imports even cheaper.

John Kenneth Galbraith, in his seminal work The Great Crash 1929, did not attribute the stock market collapse of 1929 to tariffs. That was not practical since they came in June 1930 after the CRASH. Instead, Galbraith emphasized factors such as speculative excess, margin buying, fraudulent corporate structures, and weak banking practices as the primary causes of the crash. His analysis was focused on the immediate financial mechanisms and psychological factors driving the bubble and its burst. While he acknowledged broader economic vulnerabilities, he did not highlight tariffs as a direct cause of the crash itself.

Smoot_Hawley

However, tariffs, particularly the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, are often cited as exacerbating the Great Depression that followed the crash, thanks to the Democrats who use it simply because the sponsors were both Republican. Since Smoot-Hawley was enacted after the crash, Galbraith did not blame it for the market collapse but might have recognized its role in worsening global trade and economic relations during the 1930s.

1932 The Evening Journal Wilmington Delaware • Tariffs c aused depression

The assertion that the Smoot-Hawley Tariff caused the Great Depression was used during the 1932 election by the Democrats. However, it is not widely attributed to a single individual among reputable economists or historians today. Most scholars view the tariff as a contributing factor that exacerbated the global economic downturn rather than its primary cause, since it was not enacted until the following year. However, several figures have prominently criticized its role:

  1. Economist Milton Friedman: While Friedman emphasized monetary policy failures by the Federal Reserve as the primary cause of the Depression, he and co-author Anna Schwartz noted in A Monetary History of the United States (1963) that Smoot-Hawley worsened international trade tensions.
  2. Political Figures: Opponents of Herbert Hoover, such as Franklin D. Roosevelt, criticized the tariff during the 1932 election, though they focused more on its role in deepening the crisis rather than claiming that they originated it.
  3. Cordell Hull: As Secretary of State under FDR, Hull vehemently opposed protectionism and worked to reverse the Smoot-Hawley Act through reciprocal trade agreements, blaming it for damaging global commerce. As Secretary of State, he championed the RTAA as part of his vision for liberalized trade and international cooperation. However, the RTAA required periodic Congressional renewal (extended 11 times by 1945).
  4. Economic Historians: Scholars like Barry Eichengreen and Charles Kindleberger discuss Smoot-Hawley in the context of 1930s protectionism and its role in stifling international cooperation, but they do not single-handedly credit it with causing the Depression.
Tariffs 1933

The claim that the Smoot-Hawley Act “caused” the Great Depression is oversimplified and more commonly found in political rhetoric or popular discourse of the Democrats, who used it as a campaign argument to blame Republicans when it was a response to the high tariffs first imposed by Europe. Academic consensus recognizes it as one of many factors (alongside stock market collapse, banking crises, and monetary policy) that deepened and prolonged the crisis. No major economist or historian is definitively cited as claiming it was the sole cause.

1937 DJIND Roosevely Crash

 When the economy turned down in 1937, there was widespread panic. People feared that this would be 1929 all over again. They called for raising margins and even curtailing short-selling, as always.

Panic Short Selling Oct 1937

The tariff reforms did not prevent the Crash of 1937. Tariffs were NOT the cause of the collapse of 9,000 banks. We are being subjected to another media attempted coup to undermine Trump and hopefully embarrass the Republicans to vote Democrat against him. They will do whatever they can to destroy Trump.

cnn tARIFFS 4 3 2025
cnn tARIFFS 4 9 25