President Trump Remarks During Meeting with President Moreno of Ecuador – Video and Transcript…


President Trump and Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno deliver remarks to the press pool prior to a bilateral meeting in the White House. [Video and Transcript Below]

.

[Transcript] – PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, thank you very much. It’s great to be with the President of Ecuador — and it’s one of the most beautiful countries in the world — and perhaps equally as important, and maybe even more importantly, your great First Lady. Thank you very much for being here. This is a tremendous honor. Some of the most beautiful landscapes in the world and one of the most beautiful places on Earth, they say. I’ve heard that for a long time.

And we are working on trade deals, we’re working on military options, including the purchase of a lot of our military equipment. We do make the best equipment in the world, by far. And we’re negotiating some very important pacts between Ecuador and the United States.

So, Mr. President, Madam First Lady, thank you very much. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Please.

PRESIDENT MORENO: (As interpreted.) I would like to first thank everyone for — especially Mr. President, for his kindness and to invite us over to talk about these very important topics — topics which are common to both countries. I’d like to thank the President for the warmth with which he has greeted us.

And I have to stress the fact that our relationship between Ecuador and the USA is a relationship of fraternity that has been going — that dates back a very long time.

We actually have taken the foundational principles of the U.S. to — as a basis for our own foundational principles to create the first Republic of Ecuador.

We are going to be discussing issues that are common to both nations, such as democracy, liberty, freedom, respect of human rights, the fight against organized crime, the fight against drug trafficking, the fight against corruption.

And we are going to also be speaking about the importance of investment, trade, technology transfer that are all common principles to us. We know that both our peoples want to be governed with justice and equality, and that is what both of us are striving for.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: We want to thank you very much. This is a great honor to be with you.

Okay. Do you have any questions? Yeah.

Q On Roger Stone, sir. On Roger Stone: Isn’t your tweet political interference?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, not at all. He was treated very badly. Nine years recommended by four people that — perhaps they were Mueller people. I don’t know who they were. Prosecutors. And they — I don’t know what happened. They all hit the road pretty quickly.

Look, you had somebody — just recently, you saw what happened. He got two months. He got sentenced to two months for leaking classified information at the highest level.

Q Who’s that that you’re referring to?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: They treated Roger Stone very badly. They treated everybody very badly. And if you look at the Mueller investigation, it was a scam because it was illegally set up. It was set up based on false documentation and false documents.

If you look at what happened — how many people were hurt. Their lives were destroyed. And nothing happened with all the people that did it and launched this scam. Where’s Comey? Why — where is Comey? What’s happening to McCabe? What’s happening to Lisa and — to Pete Strzok and Lisa Page? What’s happening with them? It was a whole setup, it was a disgrace for our country, and everyone knows it too — everyone — including NBC, which gives a lot of fake news.

The fact is that Roger Stone was treated horribly and so were many other people. And their lives were destroyed.

And it turns out — if you look at the FISA warrants and what just happened with FISA, where they found out it was fixed, that it was a dirty, rotten deal. So when you look at that, and you see what happened to Roger Stone —

But think of it: A man leaks classified information — highly classified. They give him two months — Roger Stone — for doing — nobody even knows what he did. In fact, they said he intimidated somebody. That person said he had no idea he was going to jail for that. That person didn’t want to press charges. They put him in for nine years. It’s a disgrace.

And, frankly, they ought to apologize to a lot of the people whose lives they’ve ruined.

All right. Next question. Go ahead.

Q Mr. President, it’s the first time —

Q Mr. President —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yeah. Please, Steve.

Q — are you considering a pardon for Roger Stone?

Q — that (inaudible) official visit —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Wait, wait, wait. What?

Q Oh, sorry.

Q Are you considering a pardon for Roger Stone?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I don’t want to say that yet. But I tell you what: People were hurt viciously and badly by these corrupt people.

And I want to thank — if you look at what happened, I want to thank the Justice Department for seeing this horrible thing. And I didn’t speak to them, by the way, just so you understand. They saw the horribleness of a nine-year sentence for doing nothing. You have murderers and drugs addicts; they don’t get nine years. Nine years for doing something that nobody even can define what he did.

Somebody said he put out a tweet, and the tweet — you based it on that. We have killers, we have murderers all over the place — nothing happens. And then they put a man in jail and destroy his life, his family, his wife, his children. Nine years in jail. It’s a disgrace.

In the meantime, Comey walks around making book deals. The people that launched this scam investigation — and what they did is a disgrace. And, hopefully, it’ll be treated fairly; everything else will be treated fairly.

Q Sir, aren’t you speaking — aren’t you speaking to the Attorney General through your tweets?

Q Mr. Donald Trump —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Go ahead, please.

Q (As interpreted.) Mr. President, I’d like to congratulate you for the macroeconomic indicators; they’re excellent. But in that number, the growth expectations are going down, especially for the growth in Ecuador, which is at zero. How can we help Latin American economies? How can we help Ecuador, Mr. President? And congratulations.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, thank you. I love that question. I wish we had some people like that here. He’s congratulating us on our great success as a country. And I want to congratulate you, too, because what you’ve done in Ecuador and your President have done a fantastic job. Thank you very much.

Q Mr. President, are you concerned about the four prosecutors?

Q Thank you, Mr. President —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I’m not concerned about anything; concerned about nothing.

Q Does it show that there’s something wrong at DOJ?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I’m not concerned about anything. They ought to go back to school and learn, because I’ll tell you, with the way they treated people, nobody should be treated like that.

Go ahead.

Q Mr. President, thank you so much. It’s been 17 years since the last time a President from Ecuador visited the White House and a President of the United States did an official visit with them —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: And when was it? When was it?

Q Seventeen years ago.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Wow.

Q It was with George W. Bush in 2003. What changed now? What is your specific interest with Ecuador now?

Thank you, Mr. President.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: She did a good job. Go ahead. I think I understood it.

PRESIDENT MORENO: (As interpreted.) Ecuador has — after having gone through very hard times, and especially in regards to its international relationships — has decided to come together again with the international community and bring refreshed relationships to those who are — who have the same way of thinking as we do. We wanted to come closer to them.

(Continues answer in Spanish.) (Interpreter pauses translation.)

(Cross-talk by reporters.)

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Don’t interrupt. Don’t interrupt.

(Interpreter resumes translation.)

PRESIDENT MORENO: (As interpreted.) We need to remember that the USA is the main trade partner for Ecuador. And this is not only in terms of trade, but because we share many common values such as the love for liberty, democracy, justice, solidarity, fraternity, and the respect of human rights.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: And I can tell you the thing that has changed from our standpoint: We’re the number-one economy in the world, by far. We’ve never done better. We have the strongest markets we’ve ever had. The market is up very substantially today: 250 points, when I last looked.

And our country has never done better, militarily. We’ve rebuilt our military. We’ve cut our taxes; we’ve cut regulations at a level that nobody has ever been able to cut them.

And our country is doing great, and we’ve really reestablished a lot of relationships, but we have certainly reestablished it with Ecuador. Ecuador had a very unusual outlook on life, but with your great President, he realizes how important it is to get along with the United States.

And I want to just congratulate him, because our relationship is very good. He’s made tremendous progress.

Q Mr. President, are you open to working on a trade deal with Ecuador?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yeah, sure, we will. And they have incredible product. And they grow it and they make it, and we like it. So, we will. Sure. And they need our product, too.

Q Is it going to be like the USMCA? That’s your model for that?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, that’s a great model. We just finished that, and it’s a great model with Mexico and with Canada. USMCA has been very successful. Already, the fruits are really taking place. You take a look at what’s happening in terms of the kind of numbers we’ll be doing with the USMCA. And this, on a much smaller scale, would be interesting. We are looking at that kind of a model, yes.

Q And on Venezuela, are you going to talk about that? And are you worried about the assault on Juan Guaidó yesterday when he arrived in Caracas?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yeah, we’ll be looking at and talking about Venezuela. And it’s always close to our heart. We have millions of people from Venezuela living in the United States very successfully. They love our country and they love Venezuela. We’ll take care of the Venezuelan people.

Q Sir, some Republicans said they hope you learned a lesson from impeachment. What lesson did you learn from impeachment?

I think you were — you weren’t chosen. Steve, go ahead.

Q Thank you, sir. The Filipino President decided to —

Q (Asks question in Spanish.)

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Excuse me, one second. We’ll do this gentleman and then you. Go ahead. Steve?

Q The President of the Philippines decided to sever a U.S. military pact with the United States. What was your reaction to that, sir? Is there anything to convince him otherwise?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, I — I never minded that very much, to be honest. We helped the Philippines very much. We helped them defeat ISIS. I get along — actually, I have a very good relationship there. But I — I really don’t mind. If they would like to do that, that’s fine. We’ll save a lot of money. You know, my views are different than other people. I view it as, “Thank you very much. We save a lot of money.”

But if you look back — if you go back three years ago, when ISIS was overrunning the Philippines, we came in and, literally, single-handedly were able to save them from vicious attacks on their islands. But I haven’t heard exactly that, what you — the way you expressed the question.

And my relationship, as you know, is a very good one with their leader. And we’ll see what happens. They’ll have to tell me that.

Q Thank you, and good afternoon, Mr. President. (Asks question in Spanish.)

(Repeats question in English.) My question is about security. We know that Ecuador has a problem with narco-traffic and some other problems. So one of the topics you’re going to talk about is security. I want to know what Ecuador wants to learn from the United States in that topic.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, we’re doing very well on our southern border. We’re doing incredibly well. We built over 100 miles now. It’s substantially more than that, of wall. Very powerful wall. It’s got all sorts of protections on it. We have alarm systems, we have lighting systems, we have everything you can have. It’s pretty much the ultimate of what you can do in terms of that. We have great protection. We have great protection with our military.

We’ve been dealing also with Mexico. Mexico has 27,000 soldiers on our southern border, and they’ve been great. And we just set another record. As you saw, the numbers have come way down in terms of people coming through our border. Way down. They’re going to be very low.

And after the wall is complete, even in the areas where we’re now over 100 miles, incredibly, the traffic has virtually stopped. It’s come to a halt. The wall has been a tremendous — a tremendous thing.

So we’ll have that finished by the end of next year. And sometime during next year, we’ll have it finished. And we’ll probably be up to close — by the end of this year, close to 400 miles of wall. And it’s made a tremendous difference.

So we have great security. We’ll be discussing with Ecuador their situation and their security. They do have a problem with the narcos, and that’s not good. And we will be working with them to help, okay?

Q (In Spanish.)

Q Mr. President, why (inaudible) nomination?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: One second. She’s going to just answer the question.

Q He’s going to answer my question.

PRESIDENT MORENO: (In Spanish.) (No translation provided.)

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Last night, as you know, we had a very interesting election, and from the standpoint of the Republican Party and myself, but from the standpoint of the Republican Party, it was a tremendous success. I got more votes than any incumbent President in many decades. That includes a lot of Presidents. And it was really incredible — the love in New Hampshire.

And, by the way, we did the same thing in Iowa, and we were actually able to quickly count our votes. We knew within minutes after the poll how many votes we had, unlike the Democrats.

So we had a tremendous success in Iowa. And last night, we had a tremendous — a very powerful success in New Hampshire. So it was a great honor.

But setting that record in both states was terrific, and now we’re off to some areas that I like very much: Nevada, you look at that; South Carolina, you look at that. And I think we’re going to do very well there. Probably setting up a major rally in South Carolina. We already have one in Nevada. So we’ll be in those two locations, and we’ll be at a few others also. But it’s been incredible.

The rally we had in New Hampshire and in Iowa — again, it was almost the same; it was — they were both spectacular. You could have put them in a big stadium. We were already in large arenas, but you could’ve put them in a big stadium. We could’ve sold it out numerous times, so it was really, really terrific. And we appreciate it. Yeah, we appreciate it.

Q Who is the Democratic front-runner, sir?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: That’s a good question. I would say Bernie looks like he’s doing very well.

Q Why is he surging?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I think people like his message. He’s got energy. His people have energy. But they like his message. But a lot of people don’t like that particular message. But there is a group that probably agrees with it. And, you know, whoever it is, we’ll take them on. But it would certainly seem that Bernie Sanders has the advantage right now.

Q Will you debate whoever wins? Will you debate whoever wins?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Sure. I look forward to it, actually.

Q Lisa Murkowski, moments ago — Lisa Murkowski, earlier, said that you shouldn’t have gotten involved with the Roger Stone case. She said it’s just bad. Some Republicans have said they hoped you would learn a lesson from impeachment. What lesson did you learn from impeachment?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: That the Democrats are crooked. They’ve got a lot of crooked things going. That they’re vicious. That they shouldn’t have brought impeachment.

Q Anything about yourself?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: And that my poll numbers are 10 points higher because of fake news like NBC, which reports the news very inaccurately. Probably more inaccurately than CNN, if that’s possible. “MSDNC” and you’re “MS…” and if you take a look at NBC. No, I think they’re among the most dishonest reporters of the news.

Okay. Thank you very much, everybody. I appreciate it. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you very much.

END 3:01 P.M. EST

President Trump and First Lady Melania Welcome President Lenin Moreno and Mrs. Rocio Gonzales De Moreno to the White House – Video…


Earlier today President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump welcomed the President of the Republic of Ecuador and Mrs. Rocio Gonzales De Moreno to the White House.

Ecuador is a key country for stability in central America.  A key topic of discussion between the two leaders will be Venezuela.  Ecuador is suffering firsthand the effects of Nicolas Maduro and his dictatorship in Venezuela with waves of economic migrants from Venezuela arriving through Colombia to Ecuador.   The refugee crisis represents a fiscal strain and also a security threat. There are 400,000 Venezuela refugees in Ecuador.

Counter-narcotics and a trade agreement are also a priority for this meeting. The United States and Ecuador are very close to a free trade agreement. USTR Robert Lighthizer has held a successful round-one negotiation for trade and investment with the Ecuadorian Commerce Ministry; and a second round is likely very soon.

.

Ecuador and the United States are working toward an energy and infrastructure framework agreement under America Crece.  Brazil is likely to join in March and they will join Panama, Chile, Argentina, Jamaica, Colombia, El Salvador, and hopefully Ecuador.

Excellent News – HJC Chairman Jerry Nadler Demands Testimony From AG Bill Barr – Scheduled Hearing March 31st…


Now this is what we call almost too much winning….  The House Judiciary Committee is demanding testimony from U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and specifically identifying three issues they wish to target.   AG Bill Barr has agreed to testify to their concerns on Tuesday March 31st, 2020.  [cloud pdf Here]

Considering the issues outlined by the Democrats; and knowing the rabid nature of their base of resistance that demands HJC action; this is the biggest briar patch in recent congressional history & AG Barr is one big rabbit proclaiming: ‘don’t throw me in’. When you read the issues of concerns, you realize this is going to be epic.

Chairman Nadler says in his letter: “we have repeatedly warned you and your predecessors that the misuse of our criminal justice system for political purposes is both dangerous to our democracy and unacceptable to the House Judiciary Committee.”  Oh my!

The HJC goes on to say: “In your tenure as Attorney General, you have engaged in a pattern of conduct in legal matters relating to the President that raises significant concerns for this Committee. In the past week alone, you have taken steps that raise grave questions about your leadership of the Department of Justice.”…  Oh dear!

So what are the three pressing issues that Chairman Nadler says “are enough to require our immediate attention”?

[SOURCE]

  • The ongoing developments following the removal of U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu, who oversaw the prosecutions of President Trump’s deputy campaign chairman Rick Gates, President Trump’s former national security advisor Michael Flynn, and President Trump’s longtime political adviser Roger Stone.

See?  The HJC and Lawfare staff are clueless.  First, AG Barr previously slobbered all over Jessie Liu; he couldn’t praise her enough.  Barr had zero conversation with President Trump about withdrawing the nomination, and only gained an understanding of the Liu concerns independent from President Trump.

The Lawfare crew has no idea what they are walking into if they start down the path of asking about why Jessie Liu was: (a) removed; and (b) had her nomination withdrawn.  For all intents and purposes AG Barr is an ally of Ms. Liu, and it only highlights the independence of his office that President Trump’s action is independent.

  • The creation of a new “process” by which President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani can feed the Department of Justice information, through you, about the President’s political rivals.

The “process” of receiving information on possible criminal conduct is open to anyone and everyone to report, including all Americans.  Obviously the HJC and Democrats writ large are worried about their financial schemes to exploit wealth and sell influence may be hampered by any corruption investigation of Ukraine…. but more importantly, they are seeking to find out how much their own activity is exposed.

I cannot think of a single bullet-point easier for Barr to have fun with than a committee that is verklempt about the U.S. Department of Justice allowing people to report possible criminal activity.  The entire framework of their argument is silly and fraught with pretzel logic.  That’s the purpose of the justice system, to allow people a process to rectify criminal activity.

Secondly, didn’t the same House Committee just spend months complaining about Giuliani operating independent investigations?… and not following the “established processes and norms”?   Now they don’t want Giuliani to be allowed to contact the DOJ and engage in long established processes and norms?  Their argument is circular.

  • The decision to overrule your career prosecutors and significantly reduce the recommended sentence for Roger Stone, who has been convicted for lying under oath, at the apparent request of the President — a decision that led to all four prosecutors handling the case to withdraw from the proceedings in protest.

This point of oversight concern opens up a world of opportunity for AG Barr to lay out how members of the Mueller team were rogue prosecutors.  Truth is the greatest disinfectant and Bill Barr has actual examples of tiered-justice based on political bias.  Again, the point they are concerned about will backfire; bigly.

“These are not the only issues that our Committee intends to discuss with you when you appear, but they are enough to require our immediate attention”…

This March 31st hearing should be buckets of fun.

Lastly, why March 31st?

All of the points raised by the HJC are transparently easy to knock down now.  Why postpone for two months?  The likely answer is John Durham will be finished…. drops of information therein will take place…. the hearing is pre-scheduled… etc.

The HJC has just boxed themselves in to holding a hearing…. Think about it.

Remember, the HJC never held a hearing about the IG Horowitz FISA report because that type of hearing is adverse to the political interests of Democrats in the House.  They don’t want to hold hearing where former administration DOJ & FBI abuses are discussed.  However, now AG Bill Barr has a hearing scheduled on the books.  Now AG Bill Barr has a date on the congressional calendar the House cannot avoid.

Now AG Bill Barr has a target date and two months to coordinate releasing the information gathered from within John Durham’s investigation.  Release the Durham information a week prior to March 31st and the HJC is trapped into a holding a hearing about topics they don’t want to see public.

Chairman Jerry Nadler has just scheduled a hearing for Bill Barr.

Funny how that happens.

The timing, the purpose and the likelihood of what is going to happen is so transparently obvious it’s as if knuckleheaded Chairman Nadler is working for Bill Barr.

President Trump New Hampshire Primary Vote Crushes All Prior Incumbents…


Interesting conversation. President Trump’s 2020 Strategic Communications Director, Marc Lotter, appears for an interview with Stu Varney and discusses Trump’s reelection campaign and performance last night in the New Hampshire primary.

Mr. Lotter highlights some upcoming Trump rallies and events being coordinated by the reelection campaign in key 2020 states.   Additionally, Lotter highlights the New Hampshire result last night showing President Trump receiving far more votes than any incumbent president in history.

.

It’s also worth noting that during the 2016 GOP primary contest in New Hampshire President Trump received 30,000 more votes (against Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush) than Bernie Sanders received last night (against Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar) during the Democrat primary.

Unfortunately, A Corrupt Group of Politically Focused DOJ Lawyers Isn’t The Only Issue…


Four of Robert Mueller’s special counsel prosecutors strategically and purposefully resigned their positions yesterday in an attempt to create a political narrative against U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr – through a ridiculous Roger Stone sentencing memorandum.

In a subsequent interview with Lou Dobbs, House Intel Committee ranking member Devin Nunes noted the activity of Mueller’s 19 lawyers was likely to come under scrutiny now, as people start to ask common sense questions.  [Ex. what were these DOJ lawyers doing for over two years if there was zero evidence of any Trump-Russia collusion?]

However, I would draw attention to an even more troubling issue that media pretend not to even notice.  From the Mueller Report (pg 13):

An issue that everyone overlooked is more serious than tin-foil-hat DOJ lawyers chasing DNC stories of Olaf and his Macedonian meme generating buddies on Facebook.

A significant issue is in the part of the story most have skipped past without recognizing,… because, well, simply we have become immune to the insanity of it.

... 40 FBI Agents worked on the Special Counsel?

Think about it.  For three years… Doing what exactly?

I’m going to skip over the part where everyone recognizes these are the same FBI agents investigating Trump in 2016… who transferred into the Mueller team in 2017… to continue the investigation into 2018 and 2019.  As if that wasn’t alarming enough… I digress.

Forty FBI agents, spent three years on a mission to investigate/eliminate the candidacy and presidency of Donald Trump.

Don’t let ourselves get dragged into the absurdity and travel down a conversational path where DC justification is put through a cognitive blender.  Forty FBI Agents spent three years trying to aid a transparently political effort to remove a president.

If you give them the benefit of being sound-minded, we had Forty FBI agents who transparently had to know this was a ridiculously weaponized political operation against the opposing political party of their FBI and DOJ leadership… and they went along with it.

The whole damned thing was a ruse.

What exactly would forty FBI agents be investigating?

You can take that insufferably overused qualifier: “we’re not talking about the hard-working FBI field agents here..“, and stuff it.  I’m exactly talking about forty transparently corrupt FBI field agents who, according to EVERYONE, participated in an investigation that was political nonsense from the beginning.

And they all did what?

Went along with it… that’s what they did.

That aspect doesn’t seem to be appearing anywhere.

That aspect doesn’t seem to be bothering anyone.

And where are they now?

That in-your-face issue hasn’t been discussed anywhere amid thousands of hours of pundit conversation, and thousands more column inches dedicated to discussion of this fabricated political operation.

Is someone actually going to try and tell me Forty FBI Agents didn’t know the Vast Russian Conspiracy was a bucket of nonsense from, um, at least day #2?..

These are the best investigators in the world?  These are the elite investigative units that we count on to investigate serious crimes and avoid terrorist threats?

Who are they?  Name them !  Every one of them needs to be named, publicly.  We paid for this, don’t we have a right to know the name of every person who participated in this investigation?

Now that it’s over; and with the publication of the Weissmann/Mueller report long since past; don’t we get to find out what exactly we were paying for?

Democrats say they demand transparency; OK, I’ll play.  Make them live up to their own rules….  I want the names of every FBI individual who participated in this investigation. So we can have an opportunity to watch congress sit them down in groups and question them about what exactly they were doing for three years.

Again, think about it.

What does forty FBI agents working on this Russian conspiracy case for three years tell us about the operational integrity of the FBI as an investigative institution?

(LINK)

Roger Stone Sentencing!


SORRY BARNEY.

Roger Stone played a large part in the election of Donald Trump. His best-selling book, “Clinton’s War on Woman” undoubtedly cost Hillary a great many votes. It was that devastating.

Hillary spent more campaign money than Trump. She had the fake news mass media and the Deep State Swamp on her side, but thanks to ‘deplorables’ such as Stone, she lost.

Hillary got even. She put her ‘Russia Collusion’ insurance policy into play. She paid for the bogus Steele Dossier, which meant Hillary was the one who colluded with a foreign country to influence our election. The FISA warrant system was abused and Trump and his campaign was spied upon illegally. Mueller’s Russia witch hunt began, which ended up costing our nation years of wasted time and millions in tax dollars. Mueller made sure he extracted revenge for Hillary by arresting Roger Stone. The special prosecutor put on a big show, too. Roger’s early morning arrest involved dozens of heavily armed FBI men. CNN was tipped off and they were there to capture footage of the humiliation. They wanted to make a big deal out of handcuffing the ‘bad man.’

Swamp draining in progress.

—Ben Garrison

 

Devin Nunes in Wolverine Mode: This is Only The Beginning of Sunlight on The Mueller Team…


Devin Nunes appears with Lou Dobbs and breaks the news on national media the nomination of former DC Attorney Jessie Liu was withdrawn.  Mr. Nunes went on to discuss the issues around the DOJ and Deep State resistance effort and then contrasts the sentencing recommendation for Roger Stone against the 30-day sentence for SSCI Security Director James Wolfe.

Additionally, Representative Nunes notes this is only the beginning of sunlight upon the dirty lawyers who organized within the Mueller probe…. and there will be much more to come.

The Great Lou Dobbs Reveals Stunning Information about U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu Connected to Wolfe Case Cover-up…


Wow, earlier tonight the great Lou Dobbs shared some incredible information with his audience that highlights just how Machiavellian the DC system of tiered justice can be.

In a tremendous exposé on Fox Business with Lou Dobbs, the intrepid bringer of sunlight outlined how the Senate Intelligence Committee Security Director James Wolfe leaked the FISA application used against Carter Page and how DC U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu dropped all charges related to the leak and instead only charged Wolfe with one count of lying to FBI investigators.   Wolfe only received a 60 day sentence.  WATCH:

.

It would appear Mr. Dobbs expose’ helped bring sunlight ultimately resulting in the withdrawal of Ms. Liu’s nomination.  Dobbs is terrific.  Thank You !

BREAKING: President Trump Withdraws Nomination of Jessie Liu…


Complicated business folks, complicated business....

WASHINGTON – President Trump is withdrawing his nomination for former U.S. attorney for D.C. Jessie Liu to serve as the Treasury Department’s undersecretary for terrorism and financial crimes, a top position overseeing economic sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge.

[…] This was “the president’s call,” according to a former administration official familiar with the situation. The decision, which was made today, has administration officials questioning the circumstances that led to Trump changing his mind — with the developments in the Roger Stone case today being the only one they are aware of.  (read more)

Great job folks. Apparently the Senate will not have  to ask Ms. Liu any pesky questions…. Imagine that.

President Trump Signs Bill Supporting Veterans For STEM Jobs, With Oval Office Presser…


Earlier today President Trump signed a bill supporting the retraining and re-skilling of military service members for important Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) jobs. S. 153, the “Supporting Veterans in STEM Careers Act,” which promotes veteran participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, computer science, and scientific research.

At the conclusion of the remarks celebrating the bill, President Trump took questions from the media (press remarks @21:10) [Video Below – Transcript Will Follow]

During the press portion President Trump took questions on a variety of topics to include the DOJ, the outrageous Roger Stone sentence, Michael Bloomberg, the upcoming trip to India and interestingly President Trump says he is aware who “anonymous” is, but doesn’t want to say… “you’d be surprised, you’d be surprised”. Much more: