The DOJ and Michael Flynn defense attorney Sidney Powell have filed a joint status report and motion for expedited hearing with Judge Emmet Sullivan. [pdf available here] According to the filing the DOJ and defense have conferred with the Sullivan appointed amicus (Gleeson) who will respond to the motion to dismiss by September 11th.
Following the Sept. 11th amicus briefing, the DOJ and defense will jointly respond and that should end the need for further briefings and replies. As a consequence the proposed date for court appearance, and hopeful final disposition, are: Sept: 23, 24, 28, 29.
Once again showcasing the strategic success of the Trump Doctrine: focusing on economic security as a tool for national security – President Vučić of Serbia and Prime Minister Hoti of Kosovo joined President Trump in the oval office today to sign a joint statement of economic cooperation between the two nations. Truly a remarkable accomplishment.
.
[White House] – Statement by the President Regarding Economic Normalization between Serbia and Kosovo
Today, I am pleased to announce yet another historic commitment. Serbia and Kosovo have each committed to economic normalization. After a violent and tragic history and years of failed negotiations, my Administration proposed a new way of bridging the divide. By focusing on job creation and economic growth, the two countries were able to reach a real breakthrough on economic cooperation across a broad range of issues.
We have also made additional progress on reaching peace in the Middle East. Kosovo and Israel have agreed to normalization of ties and the establishment of diplomatic relations. Serbia has committed to opening a commercial office in Jerusalem this month and to move its embassy to Jerusalem by July.
It has taken tremendous bravery by President Vučić of Serbia and Prime Minister Hoti of Kosovo to embark on these talks and to come to Washington to finalize these commitments. By doing so, they have made their countries, the Balkans, and the world safer. I look forward to seeing Serbia and Kosovo prosper as we work together on economic cooperation in the region going forward.
President Trump has been executing a foreign policy, a clear doctrine of sorts, where national security is achieved by leveraging U.S. economic power. It is a fundamental shift in approaching both allies and adversaries; summarized within the oft repeated phrase: “economic security is national security.”
The Trump Doctrine of using economics to achieve national security objectives is a fundamental paradigm shift. Modern U.S. history provides no easy reference.
“Peace is the prize” ~ President Donald Trump
The nature of the Trump foreign policy doctrine, as it has become visible, is to hold manipulative influence agents accountable for regional impact(s); and simultaneously work to stop any corrupted influence from oppressing free expression of national values held by the subservient, dis-empowered, people within the nation being influenced.
There have been clear examples of this doctrine at work. When President Trump first visited the Middle-East he confronted the international audience with a message about dealing with extremist influence agents. President Trump simply said: “drive them out.”
Toward that end, as Qatar was identified as a financier of extremist ideology, President Trump placed the goal of confrontation upon the Gulf Cooperation Council, not the U.S.
The U.S. role was clearly outlined as supporting the confrontation. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates needed to confront the toxic regional influence; the U.S. would support their objective. That’s what happened.
Another example: To confront the extremism creating the turmoil in Afghanistan, President Trump placed the burden of bringing the Taliban to the table of governance upon primary influence agent Pakistan. Here again, with U.S. support. Pakistan is the leading influence agent over the Taliban in Afghanistan; the Trump administration correctly established the responsibility and gives clear expectations for U.S. support.
If Pakistan doesn’t change their influence objective toward a more constructive alignment with a nationally representative Afghanistan government, it is Pakistan who will be held accountable. Again, the correct and effective appropriation of responsibility upon the influence agent who can initiate the solution, Pakistan.
The process of accurate regional assignment of influence comes with disconcerting sunlight. Often these influences are not discussed openly. However, for President Trump the lack of honesty is only a crutch to continue enabling poor actors. This is a consistent theme throughout all of President Trump’s foreign policy engagements.
The European Union is a collective co-dependent enabler to the corrupt influences of Iran. Therefore the assignment of responsibility to change the status is placed upon the EU.
The U.S. will fully support the EU effort, but as seen in the withdrawal from the Iran Deal, the U.S. will not enable growth of toxic behavior. The U.S. stands with the people of Iran, but the U.S. will not support the enabling of Iranian oppression, terrorism and/or dangerous military expansion that will ultimately destabilize the region. Trump holds the EU accountable for influencing change. Again, we see the Trump Doctrine at work.
Perhaps the most obvious application of the Trump Doctrine is found in how the U.S. administration approached the challenging behavior of North Korea. Rather than continuing a decades-long policy of ignoring the influence of China, President Trump directly assigned primary responsibility for a reset to Beijing.
China held, and holds, all influence upon North Korea and has long-treated the DPRK as a proxy province to do the bidding of Beijing’s communist old guard. By directly confronting the influence agent, and admitting openly for the world to see (albeit with jaw-dropping tactical sanction diplomacy) President Trump positioned the U.S. to support a peace objective on the entire Korean peninsula and simultaneously forced China to openly display their closely-guarded influence.
While the Red Dragon -vs- Panda influence dynamic is still ongoing, the benefit of this new and strategic approach has brought the possibility of peace closer than ever in recent history.
No longer is it outlandish to think of North Korea joining with the rest of the world in achieving a better quality of life for its people.
Not only is President Trump openly sharing a willingness to engage in a new and dynamic future for North Korea, but his approach is removing the toxic influences that have held down the possibility for generations. By leveraging China (through economics) to stop manipulating North Korea, President Trump is opening up a door of possibilities for the North Korean people. This is what I mean when I say Trump is providing North Korea with an opportunity to create an authentic version of itself.
♦The commonality in these foreign policy engagements is the strategic placement of responsibility upon the primary influence agent; and a clear understanding upon those nation(s) of influence, that all forward efforts must ultimately provide positive results for people impacted who lack the ability to create positive influence themselves.
One of the reasons President Trump is able to take this approach is specifically because he is beholden to no outside influence himself. It is only from the position of complete independence that accurate assignments based on the underlying truth can be made; and that takes us to the ultimate confrontations – the trillion dollar confrontations.
A U.S. foreign policy that provides the opportunity for fully-realized national authenticity is a paradigm shift amid a world that has grown accustomed to corrupt globalists, bankers and financial elites who have established a business model by dictating terms to national leaders they control and influence. We have our own frame of reference with K-Street lobbyists in Washington DC. Much of President Trump’s global trade reset is based on confronting these multinational influence agents.
When you take the influence of corporate/financial brokers out of foreign policy, all of a sudden those global influence peddlers are worthless. Absent of their ability to provide any benefit, nations no longer purchase these brokered services.
As soon as influence brokers are dispatched, national politicians become accountable to the voices of their citizens. When representing the voices of citizens becomes the primary political driver of national policy, the authentic image of the nation is allowed to surface.
Fortunately we are living in a time of great history, and we have multiple examples surfacing around the world. National elections in Poland, Hungary, Italy, Brazil and right here in the U.S. via Donald Trump highlight responses to dysfunctional multiculturalism and financial influences from corrupt elites within the institutions of globalist advocacy: The International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Globalism can only thrive amid a class structure where the elites, though few in number, have more controlling power over the direction of government. It is not accidental the EU has appointed officials and unelected bureaucrats in Brussels as the primary decision-making authority.
As the Trump Doctrine clashes with the European global elite, the withdrawal of the U.S. financial underwriting creates a natural problem. Subsidies are needed to retain multiculturalism.
If a national citizenry has to pay for the indulgent decisions of the influence class, a crisis becomes only a matter of time.
Wealth distribution requires a host.
Since the end of World War II the U.S. has been a bottomless treasury for EU subsidy. The payments have been direct and indirect. The indirect have been via U.S. military bases providing security, the NATO alliance, and also by U.S. trade policy permitting one-way tariff systems. Both forms of indirect payment are now being reversed as part of the modern Trump Doctrine.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) highlights the August jobs report today and both measures (Household Survey and Establishment survey) show a remarkable recovery underway from the COVID-19 crisis. Overall, 1.4 million jobs were recovered and the national unemployment rate drops to 8.4%.
Most economists did not predict the unemployment rate would drop into single digits until next year. However, the historically accurate household survey shows 3.8 million people recalled, returned or found jobs; with 2.8 million saying they were no longer unemployed.
.
Despite the ongoing challenges there is good news for the most heavily impacted sectors of the economy: leisure and hospitality. Well over half of those jobs lost have been recovered. In the past four months 3.6 million jobs have been gained in this sector. Employment in food services and drinking places is still down by down by 2.5 million since the peak in February but the gain is significant and reflects a “V-shaped” recovery ongoing.
All sectors of the economy are gaining jobs back at a remarkable rate; and the key demographics are benefiting in proportion to the initial COVID-19 impact. [BLS Report HERE] With the expiration of the “extra” federal unemployment benefits at the end of July, the negative incentive has been removed; more people are stepping back into the workforce.
“This was a strong report that shows the recovery remains on track,” said Joel Naroff of Naroff Economic Advisors. “The labor market has come back faster than expected and we are seeing improvement in all segments of the economy and the workforce.” (MSM Link)
Antifa activist Michael Reinoehl (pictured left – white T-shirt) was killed during a shoot-out with “a fugitive task force” attempting to arrest him for the suspected murder of Aaron “Jay” Danielson.
According to the New York Times an arrest warrant was issued for Reinoehl on Thursday and when police moved-in to make the arrest Reinoehl was killed during an exchange of gunfire with police.
The Post Mellenial – […] Reinoehl had reportedly fled Oregon and crossed state lines into Washington. A federal fugitive task force located him outside of Olympia.
Reinoehl reportedly left an apartment complex appearing to be armed, The Olympianreported, and entered his vehicle when a shootout began. The shooting occurred in the 7600 block of 3rd Way Southeast in Tanglewilde about 7 p.m. Shots were apparently fired at a traffic stop, KATU reported.
Witnesses at the scene cited an unmarked SUV parked on School Street when the vehicle converged with another on the car at the apartment.
The suspect reportedly exited his car and fired what was believed to be an assault rifle at the SUVs. Bystanders noted hearing 40 or 50 shots, then officers returned fire, hitting Reinoehl. (read more)
In the United States of America during the 2020 election campaign, one political party has put forth a buffoon for a presidential candidate, yet much of the traction of the “Democratic” Party has so much more to do with their Marxist revolution to overthrow the United States. Why does such a statement make sense? It is likely that the Democrat leadership see Joe Biden as a “throw-away” candidate. It is true that both political parties use such “loss leaders” to keep their Party marker in the political arena, so that in a better year, the Party can “come back” as it is not forgotten. In California, to some extent, the Republican Party has all but been forgotten in the past few election seasons; and in some statewide races, they could not even field a candidate to run against a Democrat. That’s what happens when people live in a one Party state. And, as California goes, the Democrats hope that so goes the nation.
Democrat Party controls the mainstream media outlets, as well as social media platforms
Truly, is this really about a genuine presidential race? Joe Biden cannot even get up enough energy to come out of his bunker to campaign in a serious manner. And, it is doubtful that he will be able to appear on the same debate stage as Donald Trump. We’ll see. However, the much greater energy and life is being demonstrated on the streets of the battleground areas where anarchists, Antifa Blackshirts, and Black Lives Matter terrorists would like to reign supreme. Many citizens have seen the videos and alternate news reports of the realities of the Marxist revolutionaries. Unfortunately, mainstream media operations do not provide adequate coverage of the ongoing rioting in the cities, if there is any accurate coverage at all. It is not so much they are in denial as it is a news blackout.
This is a repetition of the past in that the New York Times had a real difficult times coming around to cover the Holocaust in real-time. Such news must not have been “fit to Print.” In reality, it took a long time for media moguls at the Times to acknowledge a problem with Adolf Hitler’s horrific treatment of the Jewish people. Mark Levin documents this in his “Unfreedom of the Press.” Yet, today’s media has new Jews to not worry about—the patriots, conservatives, and Christians who are the targets of the new gangs of thugs that represent Hitler’s Brown Shirts or Mussolini’s Black Shirts. But, if one wants to get real with the more appropriate comparison—the Democrat Party’s Ku Klux Klan. The element of a designated terror arm of any political party has proven essential to most totalitarian political movements within the past one hundred years. And, it has been a little over one hundred years that the Socialists or Marxists have striven to take over an American political party.
Today, the Democrat Party controls the mainstream media outlets, as well as social media platforms, so it is not a coincidence that the majority of the population is in the dark about their Marxist-based revolution. Democrat leaders, who appear oblivious, such as Jerry Nadler, who may seem oblivious to the violence and killings brought about by the extreme violence, may not truly be oblivious. Some leaders of the Party are closer to the core leadership than others, and Nadler appears to be a core player, as he led the impeachment charade of the Democrat Party. Could he really be that clueless? On the other hand, Marx advised that useful idiots can be useful, but at some point, they can become utterly useless.
The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor
Former President Obama utilized socialist policies while he was in office. And, good old Joe Biden was a partner in those policies, so he understands and now promotes such policies. But, when Obama was criticized that his administration was pursuing a socialist agenda, he seriously attempted to deflect such criticism without saying anything relevant. In a meeting of top CEOs hosted by the Wall Street Journal in 2013, Obama chided the business leaders and countered, “People call me a socialist sometimes. But, no, you’ve got to meet real socialists. You’ll have a sense of what a socialist is,” Obama stated. “I’m talking about lowering the corporate tax rate. My health-care reform is based on the private marketplace. The stock market is looking pretty good last time I checked.” A real socialist in Obama’s mind may have been his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, or as Obama refers to him as just “Frank,” in Dreams From My Father.
According to Cliff Kincaid, in an article for Accuracy in Media, in 2008, Obama also ridiculed the charge of being a “hard-core academic Marxist.” That earlier charge actually came from Dr. Alan Keyes, a Republican who ran against Obama for the Illinois Senate in 2004. Obama won that election because the Democrats outspent Republican Keyes by $14,244,768 to $2,545,325 – the largest campaign funds disparity in history. Keyes repeatedly denounced Obama as a Marxist, but so few listened, and the New York Times considered it unfit to print.
What did hit the print in a significant way was The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor, which came out in 2012, written by Dr. Paul Kengor. In this book, Dr. Kengor shares more deeply his research on Davis and reveals he was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA. So what? Skeptics may refuse to believe this was significant. Most of the MSM did. Kengor contends that Communist Davis had a very troubling and controversial impact on the early political development of President Obama, which was verified by the Associated Press who related that Davis was an “important influence” on Obama, and one whom Obama “looked to” not merely for “advice on living” but as a “father” figure.
We see anarchists, Antifa Blackshirts, and Black Lives Matter terrorists calling for an overthrow of the US government
By examining declassified FBI files, Soviet archives, and Davis’s original newspaper columns, Dr. Kengor examined how Obama and Davis connected and how Obama was “susceptible to Davis’s worldview” opposing American policy and traditional values while praising communist regimes. Was this not emblematic of the Obama Administration? Is this not the mantra of the MSM, the Hollywood elites, and those in Congress? Is it a coincidence that both James Comey, director of Obama’s FBI and John Brennan, Obama’s CIA director, at one point in their lives had been Communist sympathizers? It should be remembered that both Brennan and Comey were in the Deep State. It is a fact that Obama selected other known Marxists for some of the highest, most powerful positions in government. Some played key roles in the Russia Collusion Hoax, Spy-Gate, and the Impeachment debacle.
Many more of the associations Obama had that helped him in his political career before he became president and after he occupied the White House have come to light since 2012. But, what are Americans witnessing in the streets of several American cities just two months away from the national election? We see anarchists, Antifa Blackshirts, and Black Lives Matter terrorists calling for an overthrow of the US government, and filled with so much hatred for Donald Trump that they cannot contain their rage. There is a source to this; it is not random social justice warriors having extended fits of violence.
Obama talked about the revolution coming, and can it be so surreal that he is a primary source for this Marxist-based revolution? The bottom line: Citizens are in uncharted territory; nothing has been normal about this election year. Americans need to start reading between the lines and connecting the dots because the MSM will not report it. Otherwise, or we lose the Republic.
Real crises end with a solution. Fake crises end when they become a real crisis.
Black Lives Matter began as a fake crisis that used out-of-context viral video clips to falsely claim that police shootings of innocent black people were a national crisis. Black Lives Matter became a real crisis when its riots looted, burned, and beat their way across major cities.
There is a huge difference between supporting BLM in the abstract or fearing crime personally
A Pew poll at the end of July asked voters which issues were most important to them when deciding who to vote for the big office in 2020.
59% of voters said that violent crime was very important and another 27% said that it was somewhat important. Racial and ethnic equality had fallen behind with 52% of voters calling it very important and another 28% describing it as somewhat important.
86% of voters see violent crime as a significant presidential election issue while 80% are touting Black Lives Matter. The structural difference here is bigger than that 6%. While Black Lives Matter has benefited from a non-stop media push, violent crime has been lightly covered.
How concern about violent crime became the fifth most important issue for voters, slightly behind the coronavirus, would be baffling to anyone who gets their reality from the media.
That 86% of voters aren’t worried about crime based on what they see in the media, but because they feel personally threatened by what’s going on in their own neck of the woods.
There is a huge difference between supporting BLM in the abstract or fearing crime personally.
The Pew map of voter concerns shows that the election issues are tilting away from big picture abstractions and are being dominated by concrete issues that affect voters personally. With the exception of Supreme Court appointments, the top 5 issues, the economy, health care, the pandemic, and violent crime, are about the things that personally worry Americans.
Democrats have no answers to offer
Meanwhile the abstractions have fallen off the pyramid, with racial and ethnic equality coming in seventh place, economic inequality, a Democrat favorite, falling to ninth, and climate change and abortion coming in in the tenth and eleventh spots. All of this is bad news for the Dems.
As the DNC convention approached, the creaky messaging machine had tilted against the riots.
The New York Times and the Washington Post officially ended the embargo by running negative stories about white BLM activists in Seattle, Portland, and Washington D.C. And the media and Democrat officials began openly voicing concerns that the violence would hurt their chances.
“The rioting has to stop,” CNN’s Don Lemon intoned, while writing a proposed speech for Biden to deliver on the air. “As you know and I know, it’s showing up in polls, it’s showing up in focus groups, it is the only thing right now that’s sticking. And the Democrats are stuck with it.”
They are indeed stuck with it.
Mayor Ted Wheeler of Portland, which has seen some of the worst of the violent rioting, appeared to suggest that nothing was working, and that it “will ultimately burn itself out.”
The people whose businesses are being burnt out may be less sanguine about the crisis.
But the Democrats have no answers to offer. Even those national figures who didn’t explicitly embrace police defunding, a suicidal and unpopular political strategy, can’t push too hard against it because a sizable section of their activist base and media have been radicalized.
Not only isn’t BLM effectively mobilizing black voters but black voters are increasingly putting violent crime ahead of BLM as an urgent issue
Democrat efforts to split the difference, limiting police defunding measures and playing numbers games, only led to more direct harassment with BLM contingents showing up at their homes at night, yelling, screaming, and intimidating elected officials. The pressure may not result in the actual elimination of the police that the hate group’s activists demand, but they ensure that the Democrats will continue trying to square the circle, split the difference, and avoid a decision.
More crucially, the Democrat donor base is also deeply divided. Rejecting BLM too sharply would alienate George Soros, whose funding is not only crucial to Democrat election efforts, but whose infrastructure makes up a vital part of the American Left, but embracing it would alienate moderate Democrat donors who want Biden to stop the chaos, not give it a great bear hug.
Unlike Republicans, the Democrats are deeply conflicted on this issue. And the conflicts are undermining Democrat messaging and electability. The shift from BLM to violent crime is particularly significant when it affects the black voters on whose turnout Democrats depend.
Not only isn’t BLM effectively mobilizing black voters (though it seems to be doing a great job of radicalizing white college students and some of their blue region suburban parents) but black voters are increasingly putting violent crime ahead of BLM as an urgent issue. That reflects a national trend, but it’s particularly devastating to the Democrat strategy in this election.
Black urban voters are bearing the brunt of the violent crime and they’re not hearing the Dems talking about the issue dominating their neighborhoods and threatening their lives.
The Democrats are caught in a trap of their own making.
They’re no longer able to turn off the violence. And mildly critical media coverage won’t do it. Even if they could get some of the billionaires who have been pouring money into radical groups to turn off the spigot, there’s enough money to keep them going until November. The Democrats barely managed to stop Bernie Sanders from becoming the nominee. They can’t stop national riots by their usual backroom tactics. And they’re too ideologically hagridden to use the police.
Black urban mayors have shown the most willingness to confront the rioters and have the most political immunity for cracking down on criminals, but as long as Portland, Seattle, New York City, and other major cities are controlled by feckless white progressives, the violence will go on.
And the riots and crime are not only shifting attention away from BLM, but from the pandemic.
People can only focus on one crisis at a time, and the violence and chaos consuming entire cities is becoming more visible than an invisible virus. If this trend continues, then the Democrats will lose both of the big issues that they expected to propel them to victory.
The Democrats sowed the winds of political terror, they’ve begun to reap the whirlwind.
Featuring:
Ricky Rebel @RickyRebelRocks
Mindy Robinson @iheartMindy
Joy Villa @joy_Villa
The Deplorable Choir @The Deplorable Choir
Tommy Joe Ratliff @TommyJoe Ratliff
Dee Dee Deplorable
Produced by Ricky Rebel, Jason Fishbein, and Dee Dee Deplorable
In the most vengeful “Get-Even” political move of all time, the Democrats are ready to cancel out what is destined to be the landslide reelection of President Donald Trump—within days of the November 3rd 2020 Election.
This is not a theory or guesstimate, it’s a tragic fact waiting to descend upon America.
Democrats, who with the media, big tech, Hollywood and the Entertainment Industry, worked for four years running, trying to hamstring President Donald Trump’s every move, are no longer trying to get even with just the president—but everyone who voted for him in 2016 and will again in November.
The Democrats and media will do anything possible to avoid the joy of election night
“An analytics firm bankrolled by billionaire Michael Bloomberg is predicting that while President Trump will appear to win on November 3, Democrat Joe Biden will actually win the election days later due to mail-in voting.” (Breitbart, Sept. 1, 2020)
“Josh Mendelsohn, the CEO of Hawkfish — funded by Bloomberg and currently working for various pro-Biden super PACs — told Axios that his firm predicts a “red mirage” where Trump wins on election day but Biden wins the election days later when mail-in votes are counted:
“The reason we talk about a red mirage is in fact because we believe that on election night, we are going to see Donald Trump in a stronger position than the reality actually is. We are sounding the alarm and saying that this is a very real possibility, that the data is going to show on election night an incredible victory for Donald Trump. That is likely to be what we see.”
The Democrats and media will do anything possible to avoid the joy of election night—something both failed to do in 2016.
“Mendelsohn claims it could take weeks before Trump’s election night victory is chipped away at by mail-in votes that will show Biden as the winner. (Breitbart)
Democrats no longer hide the fact that they intend to “chip away” at Trump’s win with mail-in votes showing Biden as the winner.
“This scenario by Bloomberg’s Hawkfish predicts Trump will win in a landslide on election night. Days later though, the firm says Biden will win the election thanks to mail-in voting. (Breitbart)
“Specifically, Hawkfish’s models predict that 4-in-10 voters this year will vote by mail. Electorally, Hawkfish’s models predict Trump could win 408 electoral votes on election night to Biden’s 130 if 15 percent of total mail-in votes are counted.
Your vote will be discounted as “a mirage”
“After 75 percent of mail-in votes are counted, days and potentially weeks later, Hawkfish’s models predict the race may flip to put Biden in the lead. This particular model has Biden with a blowout victory of 334 electoral votes to Trump’s 204.
“Mendelsohn said:
“When every legitimate vote is tallied and we get to that final day, which will be Sunday after election day, it will in fact show that what happened on election night was exactly that, a mirage. It looked like Donald Trump was in the lead and he fundamentally was not when every ballot gets counted..
In other words, your vote will be discounted as “a mirage” the Sunday after Election!
“Hawkfish’s claims come as a Democrat operative detailed large-scale mail-in voting fraud conducted for years by him and staff in states like New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York. Part of the operation includes rigging elections for Democrats through paying homeless voters off, taking advantage of the elderly, posing as registered voters, and printing up fake ballots. (Breitbart)
“Democrats have fought to implement universal mail-in voting, where every registered voter on state voter rolls is mailed a ballot unsolicited, though many efforts are being challenged in court.
“Last month, the Trump campaign filed suit against Nevada for their universal mail-in voting plans that would allow votes submitted after election day to count for the election. More than 223,000 mail-in ballots sent to registered voters in Las Vegas, Nevada, for their June primary bounced as “undeliverable” — 17 percent of the total 1,325,934 mail-in ballots that were sent out in the county.
“Currently, Democrats are fighting in Pennsylvania to ensure mail-in votes received after election day are counted.
“Primary elections held in crucial swing states like Wisconsin have revealed major issues with mail-in voting. Data from 11 cities in Wisconsin, published in May, shows that at least 30,000 mail-in votes were counted after election day.”
The Fix is In
The universal Mail-in-Vote for Election 2020 is the creation of the embittered Barack and Michelle Obama, via Michelle Obama’s so-called “NON-PARTISAN, non-profit ‘When We All Vote’ Initiative.
The Fix is In, with Joe Biden VP running mate Kamala Harris now in on the act.
“Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), running mate for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, made a brief appearance during the long-awaited “Verzuz” battle between singers Brandy and Monica this week.(MSN, Sept. 1, 2020)
“I just wanted to thank you ladies, you queens, you stars. Thank you for doing this for When We All Vote. It’s so important for everyone. You both used your voice in such a powerful way, and an extension of our voices is our vote,” Harris said, referring to former first lady Michelle Obama’s voting initiative.”
The Democrats are pushing the Mail-In Vote under the cover of it being too dangerous to vote in person because of Covid-19.
“Recent data has not shown a compelling public health justification for mail-in voting. In Wisconsin’s April election, only 52 of more than 400,000 voters and poll workers were confirmed to have contracted the Chinese coronavirus. None of those cases were fatal. This equals an infection rate below two-hundredths of one percent.” (Breitbart)
Meanwhile, the name of Michelle Obama’s ‘When We All Vote’ initiative should be changed to ‘When We All Steal The Vote’.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
