NOOR BIN LADIN: The end goal is total surveillance and digital IDs controlling every aspect of your life.


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 11, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

REP. ANNA PAULINA LUNA: Corporations are getting away with hiring illegals, even children.


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 11, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

Natalie Winters: ‘Simple Sabotage’ The Latest Trump Resistance Efforts By The Deep State


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 10, 2025, at 2:00 pm EST

Steve Bannon: “You Stood Up And Said, “No, We Don’t Want The Tech Bros Making Decisions Here.”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 10, 2025, at 2:00 pm EST

SEN. HAWLEY: “Lawmakers Are Trying To Slip The AI Moratorium Back Into Defense Bill.”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 10, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

AI GOVERNANCE: Allen And Bin Ladin Report Live From Geneva On Globalist Push For Technocracy


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 10, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

IRS to Combine Church and State


Posted  originally on Jul 11, 2025 by Martin Armstrong

Politicial Corruption Ahead

The Internal Revenue Service has deemed it legal for tax-exempt places of worship to back political candidates. The Trump Administration pushed for this measure, repealing a 70-year tax code enacted in 1954 by then-Senator Lyndon Johnson known as the “Johnson B. Amendment.”

The Johnson Amendment deemed it necessary for religious organizations to maintain nonpartisan status to protect the Constitutional conditions of separation of church and state. The law forbids churches and other religious organizations from using funds to endorse political candidates. Organizations could vocally support a candidate, but by law, they were unable to financially enter politics as their tax-exempt status came with a nonpartisan clause. All of this is now changing.

“Communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted,” the IRS said in the joint filing Monday with the National Religious Broadcasters group in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

“When a house of worship in good faith speaks to its congregation, through its customary channels of communication on matters of faith in connection with religious services, concerning electoral politics viewed through the lens of religious faith, it neither ‘participate[s]” nor ‘intervene[s]’ in a ‘political campaign,’ within the ordinary meaning of those words,” the filing said.

Last year, the National Religious Broadcasters (NRB) filed a lawsuit against the IRS, claiming that the Johnson Amendment violated their First Amendment rights. The organization believes that the First Amendment protects them from any restrictions on freedom of speech and freedom of exercise of religion. Yet, these places of worship also enjoy tax code 501(c)(3) that prevents the government from collecting taxes. In Branch Ministries v. Rossotti (2000), a church attempted to sue after its tax-exempt status was revoked for financially backing a political candidate. The court once again ruled that the Johnson Amendment did not violate the First Amendment.

The court stated that the church was not prohibited from freedom of speech, as they could vocalize their support. However, the tax benefit comes with the condition of remaining nonpartisan. The ruling found the burden was not “substantial” enough to violate constitutional protections.

Repealing the Johnson Act would drastically alter political endorsements as these religious institutions not only have massive funds to spare but could turn them into tax-deductible super PACS. Dark money would certainly flow through these organizations to alter politics as any funds to the church or religious organization could be untraceable. Foreign citizens and nations could also anonymously funnel unlimited amounts of money through these tax-deductible super PACS and directly influence domestic elections.

Jewish temples would become the new AIPAC, the Catholic Church could install their candidate of choice, which would NOT have been Donald Trump, mosques would use donations as they deemed fit, the list goes on and on.

Churches and places of worship are tax-exempt because they maintain “benevolent neutrality,” which dates back to medieval England before it was brought over to colonial America. Political donations are not charitable work or philanthropy. The IRS is attempting to blur the lines between church and state. Conservatives may think that this measure could only benefit their cause, but that is far from the truth, as what constitutes a religious organization is quite vague in the United States. Then public trust of religious institutions would erode as they would be seen as political entities. The core mission of assisting those in need would be completely lost.

Steve Bannon: “This Is Nothing But The Francis And The Deep State Of The Church Rolling With The Happy Face Of Prevost”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 9, 2025, at 9:00 pm EST

Former UK Prime Minister Returns to Goldman


Posted originally on Jul 10, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Sunak Rishi

The door continues to revolve at Goldman Sachs as former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced he is returning to the firm as a senior advisor. Goldman Sachs has successfully penetrated governments globally. The revolving door is deep, systemic, and a clear conflict of interest that will never be addressed.

“I am excited to welcome Rishi back to Goldman Sachs in his new capacity as a Senior Advisor,” David Solomon, chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs, said in a statement. “In his role, he will work with leaders across the firm to advise our clients globally on a range of important topics, sharing his unique perspectives and insights on the macroeconomic and geopolitical landscape,” he added. Rishi formerly worked for Goldman before entering the UK parliament in 2015. He then went on to hold numerous positions of power, including acting as the nation’s finance minister. In fact, Rishi is STILL a member of the UK parliament even though he stepped down from his role as the leader of the Conservative Party.

Rishi attempted to return to Goldman this past May but a government watchdog agency insisted he wait a year as his advise could “overlap” with his political obligations and his “appointment could be seen to offer unfair access and influence within the UK government.”

That is how Goldman operates. The Revolving Door Project created an Independent Federal Agencies Leadership Tracker to show how often government employees swing back and forth between their positions at Goldman and the government. This is a global issue that spans across party lines.

GoldmanSachs

There has NEVER been any investigation of former Goldman Sachs people who take strategic government positions and alter policy only to leave. Robert Rubin ushered through the repeal of Glass-Steagall and resigned. Hank Paulson saved AIG, whose default would have taken down Goldman, while he eliminated two top Goldman competitors over who had the authority to bailout Lehman and Bear. There was no authority to bail out an insurance company operating in London, no less, to skirt US regulation. Even the seizure of our former company, Princeton Economics, was run by a court-appointed receiver who was a full-time board member of Goldman Sachs – Alan Cohen.

Yet, the burning question is simple. Is Goldman or its people going just too far? Their “former” people seem to be controlling the world financial system. Why is that so many people come from the same firm? Nobody will investigate because Goldman is simply one of the too big to jail and otherwise known as the Untouchable.

Goldman traded against clients

It would be very nice if someone simply conducted an investigation to see what perks these people collect after they leave government service. But why should anyone do that? Everyone in Washington and the Department of Just Us dreams of getting a job at Goldman. Every charge filed against Goldman has been dropped or paid off. They not only control the politicians but also every regulatory agency.

Again, Goldman has infiltrated every single government. It helped in structuring the euro, for example, and was accused of hiding the debt of Greece to permit it to enter the EU. Luckily Petros Christodoulou worked for the nation’s public debt management agency and led the National Bank of Greece after working for Goldman Sachs.

Mario Draghi, former PM of Italy, President of the European Central Bank, and Governor of the Bank of Italy worked as the Vice Chairman at Goldman Sachs International. Former Prime Minister of Italy and EU Commissioner Mario Monti was an international adviser at Goldman. Again, another former Italian Prime Minister, Romando Prodi, worked for Goldman and later became the President of the European Commission.

Revolving Door

Former European Union leader José Manuel Barroso went back and forth from Goldman to politics. Canada’s Mark Carney is a former employee. In the US, you have Robert Rubin, Gary Gohn, Steve Mnuchin, Jon Corzine, Jim Himes, Steve Bannon – the list goes on.

Germany’s Alice Weidel is called far-left and anti-establishment for being the head of the AfD but she too is a former Goldman employee. Malcolm Turnbull, who previously headed Goldman Sachs Australia, later became the Prime Minister of Australia and Minister for the Environment. Montenegro’s PM Milojko Spaijic is Goldman, as is Sweden’s Minister of Finance Erik Asbrink and Nigeria’s Minister of Finance Olusegun Agana. The head of international affairs at Goldman, Robert Zoellick, even went on to become the President of the World Bank and US Trade Representative, Deputy Secretary of State.

The revolving door is never-ending. It seems like it’s only a matter of time before the conspiracy theories finally give up on bashing the Rothschilds and open their eyes to who really has the power to be a mover and shaker.

Leftist Billionaire Blames Climate Change for Texas Flooding


Posted originally on Jul 9, 2025 by Martin Armstrong

Michael Bloomberg

The catastrophic flash flood in Texas claimed over 100 lives across six counties last Friday. Torrential rain caused the Guadalupe River to surge over 20 feet in a mere 90 minutes. Despite the area having a historic record of acute flooding, the climate zealots are blaming human behavior for a natural event.

Failed presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg has attempted to politicize the disaster by penning an op-ed in his paper entitled, “The Texas Floods Were Made Worse by Climate Denialism.” Bloomberg states that the government owes the victims’ families a sincere commitment to righting their deadly wrong, by tackling the problem they’ve turned their backs on for too long: climate change.” Later adding, “The refusal to recognize that climate change carries a death penalty is sending innocent people, including far too many children, to early graves.”

The same area of Texas experienced severe flooding in 1932, 1973, 1978, 1987, 1991, and 1997. San Antonio/Central Texas experienced a catastrophic flood in 1921, with the San Antonio River flooding the following year and once more in 1998. The Blanco River experienced a significant flooding event in 2015. Unfortunately, the nearby terrain causes rapid rainfall to rush into the rivers and creeks. Clay-rich soil leads to poor filtration and high runoff during these events. The Guadalupe River Basin has been known as one of the three most dangerous places in the nation for flash flooding.

Nature abides by cycles. Yet, the leftist billionaire elite preach that humans are powerful enough to cause catastrophic weather events, despite there being absolutely no concrete evidence to support these claims. Bloomberg, one of the wealthiest men in America, is worth at least $104.7 billion and will not relinquish his seven private aircrafts or mega-yacht. Fox News reported that Bloomberg emitted 10,000 metric tons of CO2 during the 1,700 flights he took on his private aircrafts in a four-year period. Yet, he was appointed as a United Nations envoy for climate action since the globalist elite declare they have the authority to tell the people how to exist. These politicians do not actually believe the nonsense they spew.

Bloomberg has been in adherence with the World Economic Forum on the quest to eliminate the entire carbon sector by 2030. He has personal interests in forcing America onto the grid and eliminating fossil fuel usage. Climate change is one of the largest psyop measures in history that the media and politicians adamantly demand everyone accept as truth without evidence.