Trump Creates New Office For Son-In-Law Kushner To Overhaul Government


Tyler Durden's picture

President Trump is reportedly creating a new position for his son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner.

The newly formed White House Office of American Innovation will leverage business ideas and potentially privatize some government functions, according to Reuters, as Kushner says:

“The government should be run like a great American company. Our hope is that we can achieve successes and efficiencies for our customers, who are the citizens,”

In a statement to the Post, Trump said:

“I promised the American people I would produce results, and apply my ‘ahead of schedule, under budget’ mentality to the government.”

Some of the areas he will focus on are veterans’ care, opioid addiction, technology and data infrastructure, workforce training and infrastructure, according to the report.

Kushner has been a regular presence at his father-in-law’s side and was earlier cleared by the Justice Department to serve as a White House senior adviser even as Democrats raised concerns about his potential conflicts of interest.

Kushner’s move comes one week after Ivanka Trump received her own office in the White House along with access to classified information and a government-issued phone after aides earlier said she would not take on a role in her father’s White House.

While we are sure Mr Kushner is eminently qualified for this role, we can’t help but feel a tinge of ‘keep it in the family’ angst as nepotism continues to rear its ugly head. However, what is more fascinating is that this new role was assigned just as Kushner faces questions over his Russian dealings(as Axios summarizes)

The NYTimes has a story this morning on Jared Kushner being summoned before the Senate Intelligence Committee to answer questions on his meetings with Russian officials and Kremlin-linked businessmen. Key highlights:

  • The White House got a heads up earlier this month on potential questions about Kushner’s meetings with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
  • Kushner also apparently met with Sergey Gorkov, who heads up Obama-sanctioned Vnesheconombank.
  • WH spokeswoman Hope Hicks confirmed these meetings, but said Kusher “isn’t trying to hide anything.”
  • Questions for Kushner include whether he discussed personal business deals (included an over-leveraged Manhattan building), per the N

Key Events In The Coming Week


Tyler Durden's picture

The key economic releases this week are the consumer confidence report on Tuesday, the third estimate of Q4 GDP on Thursday, and the PCE report as well as Personal Income & Spending data on Friday. In addition, there are several scheduled speaking engagements by Fed officials this week.

Elsewhere, on Wednesday, the UK is expected to trigger Article 50 starting the European Union exit process. In EM we have monetary policy meetings in Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, Mexico and South Africa. Banxico to hike by 25bp.

Recap of key global events:

Article 50 to be triggered on Wednesday

  • The hawkish BoE and the short market position support GBP, but analysts see negative risks in the months ahead and expect a very slow start of the negotiations after the UK government activates Article 50 next week. Europe will be busy with the elections in France and Germany, while their immediate Brexit focus will be on the UK’s EU budget contributions. Markets may have to wait until the end of this year, or even early next year, to have a better view on the negotiations and the chances of a transition period.

US data and European CPI & conf. indicators dominate

  • US: Expect a slight upward revision of 4Q GDP (final) to 2.0% from 1.9% previously. On Friday, we also look for personal spending growth of 0.2% m/m for February, unchanged from growth in January (just +0.1% in real terms). BofA looks for personal income growth of 0.4% mom, also unchanged from growth in the prior month.
  • EA: Markets We expect March inflation at 1.7% driven by developments in Spanish electricity prices and liquid fuel prices in the Euro area. On PMIs we continue to interpret them carefully given the disconnect between ‘soft’ survey data and ‘hard’ activity data. We have argued before that when this is the case, other soft data (like national sentiment indicators) and hard data are usually more reliable for economic forecasting.

The week ahead in Emerging Markets

  • There will be monetary policy meetings in Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, Mexico and South Africa. We forecast Banxico hiking 25bp. Rating reviews in Russia and Bahrain.

* * *

A breakdown of daily key events in the coming week courtesy of Deutsche Bank:

  • We’re kicking off things this morning in Europe with Germany where the March IFO survey is due out. The latest M3 money supply reading for the Euro area is also due this morning. Over in the US this afternoon the sole release is the Dallas Fed’s manufacturing survey for March.
  • With little to highlight in Europe tomorrow, the focus will be on the US where we get the advance goods trade balance for February, wholesale inventories for February, consumer confidence for March, S&P/Case-Shiller house price index for January and Richmond Fed manufacturing survey for March are due.
  • Wednesday kicks off in Japan where retail sales and small business confidence data is due. Over in Europe the focus will be on the UK with the February money and credit aggregates data. In the US on Wednesday the only data due out is pending home sales.
  • Turning to Thursday, during the European session the most notable data is due out of Germany where the first estimate of CPI in March is due. Also due out are various March confidence indicators for the Euro area. In the US on Thursday the early data is the third estimate of Q4 GDP and Core PCE, while initial jobless claims data is also due.
  • The busiest day looks set to be reserved for Friday. In Japan we will get February CPI, industrial production and employment data, while in China the official manufacturing and non-manufacturing PMI’s for March are due. In Europe we’ll get CPI reports for France and the Euro area along with Q4 GDP in the UK and unemployment in Germany. In the US data due includes February personal income and spending reports, PCE core and deflator readings, the Chicago PMI for March and the final University of Michigan consumer sentiment reading revision.
  • Away from the data the Fedspeak diary this week is packed. Today we see Evans and Kaplan speak, tomorrow we have George, Kaplan and Powell speaking along with Fed Chair Yellen (albeit at a conference which doesn’t suggest a focus on the economy or monetary policy), Wednesday see’s Evans, Rosengren and Williams speak, Thursday has Mester, Williams and Kaplan scheduled and Friday finishes with Kashkari. Away from that other important events this week include the BoE bank stress test scenarios today, a Scottish Parliament debate

* * *

Finally, focusing on the US events with consensus estimates, courtesy of Goldman

Monday, March 27

  • 10:30 AM Dallas Fed manufacturing index, March (consensus +22.0, last +24.5)
  • 01:15 PM Chicago Fed President Evans (FOMC voter) speaks: Chicago Fed President Charles Evans will participate in a panel discussion on “Monetary Policy in a New Economic Environment” at the Global Interdependence Center’s Central Banking conference in Madrid.
  • 06:30 PM Dallas Fed President Kaplan (FOMC voter) speaks: Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan will participate in a panel on economic conditions and the role of monetary policy hosted by the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy at the Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas. Audience and media Q&A is expected.

Tuesday, March 28

  • 08:30 AM U.S. Census Bureau Report on Advance Economic Indicators; Advance goods trade balance, February preliminary (GS -$64.5bn, consensus -$66.6bn, last -$68.8bn): We estimate the goods trade deficit narrowed $4.3bn to $64.5bn in February, following last month’s $4.4bn widening that we believe reflected a pronounced impact from the relatively early Chinese New Year, which likely shifted the timing of imports from February to January. Available port statistics in February suggest a sharp pullback in inbound container traffic, further evidence of the Chinese New Year shift; Wholesale inventories, February preliminary (consensus +0.2%, last -0.2%)
  • 09:00 AM S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city home price index, January (GS +0.7%, consensus +0.7%, last +0.9%): We expect the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city home price index to rise 0.7% in the January report following a 0.9% increase in the prior month. The measure still appears to be influenced by seasonal adjustment challenges, and we place more weight on the year-over-year increase, which rose to 5.6% from 5.2% in December.
  • 10:00 AM Conference Board consumer confidence, March (GS 115.0, consensus 114.0, last 114.8): We forecast that consumer confidence edged up to 115 following last month’s 3.2pt rise to a new cycle high. Our forecast reflects encouraging consumer sentiment data in February as well as recent stock market strength during most of the survey period.
  • 10:00 AM Richmond Fed manufacturing index, March (consensus +15, last +17)
  • 12:45 PM Kansas City Fed President George (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Kansas City Fed President Esther George will give the keynote speech on the U.S. economy and monetary policy at a forum on “Banking and the Economy: A Forum for Women in Banking” in Midwest City, Oklahoma. Audience Q&A is expected.
  • 12:50 PM Fed Chair Yellen (FOMC voter) speaks: Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen will give a speech titled “Addressing Workforce Development Challenges in Low-Income Communities” at the National Community Reinvestment Coalition’s annual conference in Washington D.C. No Q&A is expected.
  • 01:00 PM Dallas Fed President Kaplan (FOMC voter) speaks: Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan will participate in a moderated discussion at an event hosted by the Dallas Committee on Foreign Relations in Dallas, Texas. Audience Q&A is expected.
  • 04:30 PM Fed Governor Powell (FOMC voter) speaks: Federal Reserve Governor Jerome Powell will give a speech on the history and structure of the Federal Reserve as a part of the West Virginia University College of Business Economics’ Distinguished Speaker Series. Audience Q&A is expected.

Wednesday, March 29

  • 09:20 AM Chicago Fed President Evans (FOMC voter) speaks: Chicago Fed President Charles Evans will give a lecture on current economic conditions and monetary policy as a part of the DZ Bank’s International Capital Market’s Conference in Frankfurt, Germany. Audience and media Q&A is expected.
  • 10:00 AM Pending home sales, February (GS +4.0%, consensus +2.1%, last -2.8%): Regional housing data released so far suggest a fairly strong rebound in contract signings for existing homes in February, possibly reflecting the unseasonably warm temperatures and limited snowfall during the month. We expect a 4.0% increase in the pending homes sales index that would fully reverse January’s 2.8% pullback. An increase of that magnitude would be particularly encouraging in the context of higher mortgage rates. We have found pending home sales to be a useful leading indicator of existing home sales with a one- to two-month lag.
  • 11:30 AM Boston Fed President Rosengren (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren will discuss the economic outlook at a Boston Economic Club luncheon.
  • 01:15 AM San Francisco Fed President Williams (FOMC non-voter) speaks: San Francisco Fed President John Williams will give a presentation titled “From Sustained Recovery to Sustainable Growth; What a Different Four Years Makes” to the Forecasters Club of New York. Audience and media Q&A is expected.

Thursday, March 30

  • 08:30 AM GDP (third), Q4 (GS +1.9%, consensus +2.0%, last +1.9%); Personal consumption, Q4 (GS +3.0%, consensus +3.0%, last +3.0%): We do not expect a revision on an unrounded basis in the third estimate of Q4 GDP, where growth is currently reported at a 1.9% pace (qoq ar). While our base case entails an unchanged reading for headline GDP, we believe there is some risk of an upward revision to the personal consumption and business fixed investment components.
  • 08:30 AM Initial jobless claims, week ended March 25 (GS 240k, consensus 247k, last 261k): Continuing jobless claims, week ended March 18 (consensus 2,037k, last 1,990k): We expect initial jobless claims to decline sharply to 240k, reversing last week’s sharp rise that we believe largely reflected the impact of Winter Storm Stella. State-level details suggest an impact from the storm on the order of 15k during the week. Continuing claims – the number of persons receiving benefits through standard programs – have continued to trend down in recent weeks, suggestive of additional labor market improvement that we expect to continue.
  • 09:45 AM Cleveland Fed President Mester (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester will give a speech on payment system improvement at the 10th Annual Risk Conference, hosted jointly by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and DePaul University’s Center for Financial Services in Chicago.
  • 11:15 AM San Francisco Fed President Williams (FOMC non-voter) speaks: San Francisco Fed President John Williams will give a speech at the launch and learning community event for the Strong, Prosperous and Resilient Communities Challenge in New York.
  • 03:00 PM Dallas Fed President Kaplan (FOMC voter) speaks: Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan will take part in a moderated Q&A on economic conditions and the role of monetary policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Capital Markets Summit in Washington D.C.
  • 04:30 PM New York Fed President Dudley (FOMC voter) speaks: New York Fed President William Dudley will give a speech on “The Importance of Financial Conditions in the Conduct of Monetary Policy” at a Financial Literacy Day & Laboratory Dedication event at the University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee. Audience Q&A is expected.

Friday, March 31

  • 8:30 AM Personal income, February (GS +0.5%, consensus +0.4%, last +0.4%); Personal spending, February (GS +0.3%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.2%); PCE price index, February (GS +0.12%, consensus +0.1%, last +0.4%); Core PCE price index, February (GS +0.17%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.3%); PCE price index (yoy), February (GS +2.1%, consensus +2.1%, last +1.9%); Core PCE price index (yoy), February (GS +1.7%, consensus +1.7%, last +1.7%): Based on details in the PPI and CPI reports, we forecast that the core PCE price index rose 0.17% month-over-month in February, or 1.7% from a year ago. Additionally, we expect that the headline PCE price index increased 0.12% in February, or 2.1% from a year earlier. We expect a 0.5% increase in February personal income and a 0.3% rise in personal spending.
  • 09:45 AM Chicago PMI, March (GS 56.0, consensus 56.9, last 57.4): We expect the Chicago PMI to edge down to 56.0 in March, following a sharp 7.1pt increase in February. The index is likely to remain at a level consistent with solid manufacturing growth, in line with incoming reports from other regional manufacturing surveys.
  • 10:00 AM University of Michigan consumer sentiment, March preliminary (GS 97.8 consensus 97.6, last 97.6): We expect the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index to edge up an additional 0.2pt to 97.8 in the March final estimate, reflecting some further improvement among more timely measures of consumer confidence. The preliminary report’s measure of 5- to 10-year ahead inflation expectations declined three tenths to 2.2%, a new record low. However, median 5-year gas price expectations also dropped to a 12-year low, and in past research we’ve found a short-term relationship between these two measures that often results in a reversal in subsequent months. While we cannot rule out the possibility of a step-down in underlying views about the long-term inflation outlook, we see this as a tentative reason to expect a rebound over the next couple months.
  • 10:00 AM Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari (FOMC voter) speaks: Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari will take part in a moderated discussion on the economy and the Federal Reserve system at the Annual Banking Law Institute seminar in Minneapolis. Audience Q&A is expected.
  • 10:30 AM St. Louis Fed President Bullard (FOMC non-voter) speaks: St. Louis Fed President Bullard will participate in an interview on the U.S. economy and monetary policy at a Quinnipiac Global Asset Management Education forum in New York. No media Q&A is expected.

Source: Goldman, Bofa,

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Et tu, Gateway Pundit? Report on yesterday’s Pizzagate March on D.C. disappeared into the memory hole — Fellowship of the Minds


I wish the Demorats would disappear!

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

Memory Hole (definition): A mechanism for the alteration or disappearance of inconvenient or embarrassing documents, photographs, transcripts, or other records, such as from a website or other archive, particularly as part of an attempt to give the impression that something never happened. The concept was first popularized by George Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, where […]

via Et tu, Gateway Pundit? Report on yesterday’s Pizzagate March on D.C. disappeared into the memory hole — Fellowship of the Minds

GOOGLE IS INTERFERING WITH MY BLOG!

Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

For your information.

kommonsentsjane

View original post

Dems Move to Block Supreme Court Nominee


The Demorats are not all that smart and will try to block Gorsuch no matter what!

What Happens If They Kill Donald Trump?


Published on Mar 25, 2017

Alex Jones breaks down the repeal of Obamacare and the latest attacks on Trump.

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show

Follow Alex on TWITTER – https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
Like Alex on FACEBOOK – https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme…
Infowars on G+ – https://plus.google.com/+infowars/

:Web:
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.net/

:Subscribe and share your login with 20 friends:
http://www.prisonplanet.tv
http://www.InfowarsNews.com

Visit http://www.InfowarsLife.com to get the products Alex Jones and his family trust, while supporting the growth of our expanding media operation.

[http://bit.ly/2dhnhbS] Biome Defense™
[http://bit.ly/2bnEj91] Bio-True Selenium™
[http://bit.ly/1WYw8jp] Vitamin Mineral Fusion™
[http://bit.ly/1QYBNBv] Joint Formula™
[http://bit.ly/1nNuR3r] Anthroplex™
[http://bit.ly/1ljfWfJ] Living Defense™
[http://bit.ly/1Iobcj2] Deep Cleanse™
[http://bit.ly/1DsyQ6i] Knockout™
[http://bit.ly/1Kr1yfz] Brain Force™
[http://bit.ly/1R5gsqk] Liver Shield™
[http://bit.ly/1cOwQix] ProstaGuard™
[http://bit.ly/1mnchEz3] Child Ease™
[http://bit.ly/1xs9F6t] WinterSunD3™
[http://bit.ly/1L3gDSO] Ancient Defense™
[http://bit.ly/1EHbA6E] Secret-12™
[http://bit.ly/1txsOge] Oxy Powder™
[http://bit.ly/1s6cphV] Occu Power™
[http://bit.ly/1rGOLsG] DNA Force™
[http://bit.ly/1nIngBb] X2 Survival Shield™
[http://bit.ly/1kaXxKL] Super Female Vitality™
[http://bit.ly/1mhAKCO] Lung Cleanse™
[http://bit.ly/1mGbikx] Silver-Bullet – Colloidal Silver™
[http://bit.ly/1xcoUfo] Super Male Vitality™
[http://bit.ly/1z5BCP9] Survival Shield – Nascent Iodine™
[http://bit.ly/1o4sQtc] Patriot Blend 100% Organic Coffee™
[http://bit.ly/1iVL6HB] Immune Support 100% Organic Coffee™

All available at – http://www.infowarsshop.com/

INFOWARS HEALTH – START GETTING HEALTHY BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE – http://www.infowarshealth.com/

Newsletter Sign up / Infowars Underground Insider : http://www.infowars.com/newsletter

The Alex Jones Show © copyright, Free Speech Systems .LLC 1995 – 2017 All Rights Reserved. May use for fair use and educational purposes

Sunday Talks – Trey Gowdy -vs- CBS John Dickerson


Source: Sunday Talks – Trey Gowdy -vs- CBS John Dickerson

Watch These Geopolitical Flashpoints Carefully


One thing for sure is the Obama left us in a mess!

KOMMONSENTSJANE – DID RACHEL MADDOW GET PUNK’D BY HER OWN COHORTS? DID THE CHICKEN EVER CROSS THE ROAD?


Maddow makes a fool of herself more often than naught.

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

~ Conservative Zone
Trump’s Tax Return Wasn’t the Scoop Rachel Maddow Hoped It Would Be

For nearly two years now, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow has been itching to tar and feather Donald Trump with damaging information or expository gossip that would embarrass our country’s new president or at least make him unpalatable to the nation’s voters. On Tuesday, March 14, Maddow appeared to have just such a scoop, as she teased on Twitter to draw in ratings.
The only problem? The story was less of a scoop and more simply a piece of virtual non-news because the big piece of information she had — two leaked pages of Trump’s 2005 tax return — contained no “smoking gun” bombshells.
In fact, for all practical purposes, it made Trump look like a law-abiding citizen compared to other high-profile personalities such as ex-President Obama, Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders and wealthy investor Warren Buffett, who…

View original post 842 more words

“Don’t Say You Haven’t Been Warned”


Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Jeffrey Miller via Miller’s Market Musings,

So after a long period of basically no volatility, we finally got some – in a hurry.  In case you were out, the S&P 500 (SPX) finally had a down day of more than 1%.  But that’s not the real story.  Look in bankland, where we have been cautious ever since the rip higher on the Trump Trade (lower taxes, higher rates, lower regulations).  The KRX (KBW Regional Bank Index) fell over 5% on Tuesday – yes, the bank index took a dive of 5% in one day.  And it didn’t bounce.  The SPY was up a bit on Wednesday, but marginally, while the dollar continued to weaken versus the Yen and Euro.  The big questions being asked all revolve around whether the dip in the 10-year bond yield to under 2.40% is reflecting a weaker outlook for the Trump Trade, or, if it’s just an unwind of a massive 10-year bond short after the Fed hike last week was perceived as dovish.

Picture

All Calvin and Hobbes comics courtesy of Bill Watterson and Go Comics.

The mini-rally in the 10-year bond could be the proximate cause of the banks selling off, but that is a little too old school – that implies that what is driving these stocks right now is a focus on fundamentals.  But as long-time readers know, fundamentals only matter in the very long term – in the short term, positioning, especially among the CTA/trend following/risk parity crowd, can become very important at inflection points.  These funds all tend to been leaning in the same direction at the same time, in size, and are designed to pull down risk and then flip the other way quickly on a steep decline.  In short, they are the embodiment of feedback loops that drove the big sell off in August 2015 and in early 2016.  But…this time I think we could be in for a bigger shock.  Just because the market didn’t follow through to the downside after Tuesday doesn’t mean we’re done.  Instead, this may be a preview of coming attractions, as the KRX falling 5% in a day is a warning sign, not an all clear sign.  Because these funds can be easily spooked – especially on a hike.

Picture

The issue isn’t that there are funds that trend-surf.  The issue is that there are now a lot of them, and there has been a recent push into using these funds to “hedge” risk.  The idea is that any downturn will evolve slowly enough for these funds to sell into it – which has happened in the past.  But that was when the group was a lot smaller.  A recent Financial Times article detailed how pervasive this has become. According to the article, clients of Pension Consulting Alliance (PCA) typically allocate 10-20% of their assets to a “CRO program.” What is a CRO program?  “Crisis Risk Offset.” PCA apparently coined the term.  Now, full disclosure: I know a few people who work at PCA and they are all great folks (and neighbors).  This isn’t about them. It’s about allocating to momentum strategies in a size that may be too big to execute properly.  Portfolio insurance anyone?  If you recall, that didn’t work out well (see October 19th, 1987).  Will that (down over 20% in a single day) happen again?  Unlikely.  But we could easily get a situation where a garden-variety 5% pullback in the SPX quickly morphs into a fast 10-15% decline, as funds de-lever their equity longs or flip short.  See these charts of where we are in terms of equity exposure in various trend-following systems, and the size of these funds today.

Picture

Picture

The problem with everyone leaning in one direction is that they scare easily.  When realized volatility has been near all-time lows, as it has been in recent months, the simpler versions of these strategies view assets as less risky, so they lever them up.  What the models fail to capture is the speed with which volatility can return.  If volatility slowly creeps back up, then the models work fine.  But if it suddenly spikes higher, the models fall apart, other investors quickly de-risk, and everyone is up all night looking for ghosts.  Don’t say you haven’t been warned.

Picture

This was one of the weirder weeks I’ve seen in awhile. Various proxies for U.S. interest rates were bouncing around based on each tweet and missive from D.C. about whether or not the new healthcare bill would pass.  When the bill was first pulled on Thursday, U.S. stocks fell, and rate proxies reacted as if all of the Trump agenda was in trouble (Trump policies are viewed as inflationary, so rates move up when he’s doing well and down when he’s not).  Look at the Yen this week – every time the Trump agenda looked vulnerable, it rallied.  And then that relationship quickly fell apart at the end of the day on Friday.  When the healthcare bill got pulled for good Friday, it took about 5 minutes for the narrative to shift from Trump failed to now tax cuts can happen sooner rather than later, and so the Yen fell sharply.  This is the world we live in today – traders are making up new and different reasons to scare themselves daily.  Should we care?  I’d say no, except we’re in unstable times (see the 5% selloff in the KRX on Tuesday for proof), and with lots of money in passive funds, ETFs and trend-following strategies, it won’t take a lot to get the markets heading down fast.

Picture

So what will be the catalyst to cause more than a 1% sell-off in the SPX?  While everyone is fixated with the non-bill in D.C., I think they are missing the big risk in the market, which is only getting bigger by the day.  Long-time readers can guess where this is going.  That’s right – China.  While we’ve been distracted in the U.S., China has been raising its equivalent of the Fed Funds rate and trying to stem a credit bubble there from ballooning out of control, while at the same time trying to make sure that if they do succeed in popping the bubble, it deflates slowly.  Good luck with that.  I’m not saying they won’t be able to do it.  I’m just saying that no country has ever pulled it off before.  The borrowing rates for their non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) are rocketing higher (see the chart below) as they scramble for funds.  Evidently, the popular thing for these NBFIs to do is lend very long-term into risky ventures in order to generate higher yields, but borrow very short-term (under a year) because the funding is cheaper.  If this sounds just like our S&L crisis, version 2.0, you’d be correct.  I would have thought there are some things the Chinese may have wanted to avoid copying from the U.S., but apparently they’ll have to learn that lesson for themselves.

Take a look at the charts below.  You’re actually seeing defaults in China occur, and at an increasing rate (albeit from zero, as extend and pretend is the national motto in China, where everything is always awesome – it is always awesome, right?).  Remember, you’re also seeing short-term repo rates spiking.  A sign of renewed growth and inflation fears?   Ah, no.  It’s a sign of stress in the funding markets and increasing counterparty risks.  Put another way, credit is starting to fray in China right after the biggest increase in debt in the history of the world.

Picture

Picture

How will it end? I think Calvin has it pretty well figured out in the below comic strip.

Picture

?So to recap: the question investors need to ask themselves is what will happen if China’s issues start to manifest themselves in global markets (remember August 2015?  Me too.  We’re all in this together). The combination of large risk-parity funds and CTAs being quite long equities at the exact moment that China’s credit bubble is starting to show signs of stress could end quite badly.  The pension funds that have hired CTAs to sell into the next selloff will exacerbate what would have in the past been a normal correction.  And when retail investors who have been relentlessly told to invest their money in long-only index funds or ETFs wake up to a market that is down 10%, 15%, or 20% fast, are they going to hold on, or even buy more, or are they going to realize that their ship is just a plank, and decide to swim for shore while they can?  If history is a guide, we’re going to see lots of investors making a swim for it.

Picture

 

Why Middle Class Whites Are Dying Faster (In 6 Painful Charts)


Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Julia Belluz via Vox.com,

In 2015, a blockbuster study came to a surprising conclusion: Middle-aged white Americans are dying younger for the first time in decades, despite positive life expectancy trends in other wealthy countries and other segments of the US population.

The research, by Princeton University’s Anne Case and Angus Deaton, highlighted the links between economic struggles, suicides, and alcohol and drug overdoses.

Since then, Case and Deaton have been working to more fully explain their findings.

They’ve now come to a compelling conclusion: It’s complicated. There’s no single reason for this disturbing increase in the mortality rate, but a toxic cocktail of factors.

In a new 60-page paper, “Mortality and morbidity in the 21st Century,” out in draft form in the Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Thursday, the researchers weave a narrative of “cumulative disadvantage” over a lifetime for white people ages 45 through 54, particularly those with low levels of education.

Along with worsening job prospects over the past several decades, this group has seen their chances of a stable marriage and family decline, along with their overall health. To manage their despair about the gap between their hopes and what’s come of their lives, they’ve often turned to drugs, alcohol, and suicide.

Meanwhile, gains in fighting heart disease have stalled, and rates of obesity and diabetes have ploddingly climbed.

So the rise in mortality for white mid-life people in America since the late 1990s is actually the final stage of a decades-long process. “It’s about the collapse of white middle class,” said Case. Here are the five big takeaways from the researchers’ new opus.

1) Suicides, alcohol, and drug overdose deaths have gone up across the entire country. (Read: It’s not just a rural problem.)

 Brookings

“Deaths of despair” — or suicide, alcoholism, and drug overdoses, particularly from opioid painkillers — are a growing problem for midlife white people.

As you can see on the left-hand map, the epidemic started in the Southwest. Now it’s “country-wide,” the study authors write, and the increase can be “seen at every level of residential urbanization in the US.” So it’s not just a rural problem or an urban problem — it’s both.

The crisis is particularly acute among middle-aged whites. “The deaths of despair come from a long-standing process of cumulative disadvantage for those with less than a college degree,” Case and Deaton write. “The story is rooted in the labor market, but involves many aspects of life, including health in childhood, marriage, child rearing, and religion.”

 Brookings

In an interview, Deaton explained, “The cohort that entered the labor market in the ’70s on down, their jobs earnings and prospects are worse. That affected their marriage prospects. Marriages got screwed up. They had children out of wedlock. Their pain levels [are] going up.” All that contributes to the deaths of despair.

The study authors don’t see the opioid supply as the fundamental factor here, but “prescription of opioids for chronic pain added fuel to the flames, making the epidemic much worse than it otherwise would have been,” they wrote.

The impact of rising deaths of despair on overall mortality was masked until the late 1990s by the decline of heart disease deaths. But recently that has changed too.

2) Deaths from chronic diseases such as diabetes have been rising

County-level mortality from diabetes, urogenital, blood, and endocrine diseases between 1980 and 2014. You can see these trending up all over the country. JAMA

Progress against mortality from heart disease has slowed and stopped, and deaths from cancer, which had been on a steady decline, are also stagnating in this group.

Meanwhile, other chronic diseases have continued to rise in the whole population, particularly among middle-aged white people. Diabetes’ prevalence has exploded in the US over the past 20 years. Nearly 30 million Americans live with the disease today — more than three times the number in the early 1990s. And this may be a major, underappreciated driver of the mortality trend.

3) The least-educated Americans are suffering the most

 Brookings

The rise in mortality among middle-aged whites is largely being driven by those with a high school degree or less. The researchers find that the gap in mortality between more and less educated is increasing, while mortality is also rising for those without a college degree and falling for those with a college degree.

“It looks like there are two Americas,” Case said. “One for people who went to college and one that didn’t.”

The middle-aged whites with less than a bachelor’s degree saw “progress stop in mortality from heart disease and cancer, and saw increases in chronic lower respiratory disease and deaths from drugs, alcohol, and suicide,” the researchers write.

Why education is such an important health indicator is difficult to untangle, Case added. “But when you think about what happens when industries pull out of towns, the tax base implodes, schools [are] not well funded, and the death spiral continues.”

In the past, people with low levels of education could get a job in a factory and work their way up the chain of command. “You could graduate high school, work at Bethlehem Steel, get more money every year as you get more experienced,” Deaton said, “and turn yourself into one of the famed blue-collar aristocrats of the 1970s.” Now, he added, “There’s a feeling that life has gone, and remainders of that life are getting less and less for each generation.”

To be clear, the study authors don’t buy the idea that one’s income relative to what one expected is influencing mortality. Rather, “It’s the life you expected to have relative to your father or grandfather — it’s just not there anymore,” Deaton said.

4) Other nonwhite racial groups aren’t experiencing the same mortality uptick — so it’s not just about income

 Brookings

As you can see here, mortality for middle-aged black people converged with mortality for middle-aged white people with low levels of education in the late 2000s (though the white population overall is still doing better than African Americans). Meanwhile, mortality rates among Hispanics continued to fall.

These other racial groups aren’t necessarily doing any better economically than their white counterparts, which is part of the reason Case and Deaton don’t accept a simple income explanation for the death uptick.

“It is possible that it is not the last 20 years that matters, but rather that the long-run stagnation in wages and in incomes has bred a sense of hopelessness,” they write. “But … even if we go back to the late 1960s, the ethnic and racial patterns of median family incomes are similar for whites, blacks, and Hispanics, and so can provide no basis for their sharply different mortality outcomes after 1998.”

Instead, the researchers think the fact that the overall life prospects for white middle-aged people without a BA have declined over time — they are doing worse than their parents on both a personal and professional level, and probably worse than they expected — is nudging mortality downward. This regression is different from the story of progress in the African American community, for example. Here’s Case and Deaton again.

The historian Carol Anderson argued in an interview in Politico (2016) that for whites “if you’ve always been privileged, equality begins to look like oppression,” and contrasts the pessimism among whites with the “sense of hopefulness, that sense of what America could be, that has been driving black folks for centuries.” That hopefulness is consistent with the much lower suicide rates among blacks, but beyond that, while suggestive, it is hard to confront such accounts with the data.

5) This story is unique to the US

 Brookings

The US, particularly middle-aged white Americans, is an outlier in the developed world when it comes to this mid-life mortality uptick.

“Mortality rates in comparable rich countries have continued their pre-millennial fall at the rates that used to characterize the US,” Case and Deaton write. “In contrast to the US, mortality rates in Europe are falling for those with low levels of educational attainment, and are doing so more rapidly than mortality rates for those with higher levels of education.”

If American wants to turn the trend around, then it has to become a little more like other countries with more generous safety nets and more accessible health care, the researchers said. Introducing a single-payer health system, for example, or value-added or goods and services taxes that support a stronger safety net would be top of their policy wish list. (America right now is, of course, moving in the opposite direction under Trump, and shredding the safety net.)

They also admit, though, that it’s taken decades to reverse the mortality progress in America, and it won’t be turned around quickly or easily. But there is one “no-brainer” change that could help, Case added. “The easy thing would be close the tap on prescription opioids for chronic pain.”

Unlike health care and increasing taxes, opioids are actually a public health issue with bipartisan support. Deaton, for his part, was hopeful. Paraphrasing Milton Friedman, he said, “All policy seems impossible until it suddenly becomes inevitable.”