Democrats are mostly crooks so its only natural that they would associate with crooks — Birds of a Feather stay together as they say.
Tag Archives: Jihadists in the Democrat Party
NEW EXECUTIVE ORDER
Send them all there isolate them and then quarantine the islands
Napolitano Put On Ice By Fox For Reporting British Intelligence Spied On Trump For Obama
There was nothing that Obama wouldn’t do if he thought he could get away with it; now that Hillary lost he’s worried that some of his shit will come out as there are not many left to cover for him.
Wiretapping at Trump Tower: ‘A scandal bigger than Watergate’ – Roger Stone
All true but somehow I doubt they will ever be charged with anything as much as they deserve to be!
FBI wiretapped Trump Tower in search of ‘Russian mobster’ – report
Trump was and still is under surveillance by the deep state
Teen Vogue goes Rogue
By Tabitha Korol
It’s presented as a fashion magazine that appeals to more than a million girls, so we expect age-appropriate style and panache; new trends in accessories, makeup and hairstyles; advice about manners and dating, and some information on colleges. But this publication has strayed considerably from what a caring parent would want one’s teen to read.
Teen Vogue is an appalling anti-American propaganda rag, complete with disrespectful, insulting articles about the President of the United States, as well as one that puts the onus of failing peace talks on Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It serves as a Muslim Brotherhood façade in the way that it presents a heavily biased account of the Palestinian Arab war against the Jewish State of Israel, America’s staunchest ally and the only country in the Middle East that shares our values. Teen Vogue Emma Sarran Webster’s un-researched revised history, taken from selected leftist news sources, is an insult to their readers’ intelligence and a betrayal of democracy. It is such writing that helps twist the minds of our youth, inciting them to participate in the charade marches that support un-American issues, such as the one led by anti-Semitic, faux-feminist Linda Sarsour, who is against police, mosque surveillance, and American ideals.
According to National Public Radio, Israelis and “Palestinians” have been fighting over the same land for nearly a century, but Jews have been the indigenous people for forty centuries. Christianity emerged approximately 30 CE; Mohammed began Islam in 624 CE, waging wars of conquest ever since; and the Palestinians materialized out of whole cloth in 1967 CE.
During Roman times, Ancient Israel consisted of Judea, Samaria and Galilee. In an effort to obliterate the name of Israel and the Jewish connection to the land, the Romans renamed it “Palaestina,” an insult because it referenced the Philistines, an enemy of the Jews. These were a Cretan people that vanished by 1060 BCE, with no connection to today’s Arabs/Palestinians.
Thus, since the day it was coined, “Palestine” referred to the Jews. The Palestinian Symphony Orchestra, the Palestinian Post, and the Palestine Brigade Regiment of volunteers in the British World War II army were all Jewish. Archaeological excavations throughout Israel repeatedly yield coins, candelabra, earthenware, Hebrew writings and other relics that confirm Ancient Hebrew life. And despite the constant Arab digging and destruction under the Al Aqsa Mosque that Muslims built over the Jewish Temple, no vestiges of an Arabic or Islamic government, culture, language, monetary system, earthenware or costumes have surfaced.
Jews have been a constant presence in Israel and a majority population in Jerusalem since 1820, welcoming Arabs who sought work in rebuilding the new State of Israel. They came from Egypt (Arafat’s origin), Jordan, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, and stayed, and were caught up in the several wars begun by neighboring Arabs. Those who stayed became today’s two million Muslim population; those who fled as directed by the attacking Arab armies became a bargaining pawn, and purloined the name Palestinians to provide a narrative and fictitious link to the land. But in 1919, Arabs who lived in the land declared themselves part of Arab Syria. Ahmed Shuqeiri, chairman of the PLO, told the United Nations Security Council, “It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria.”
The land, the democratic State of Israel, has always belonged to the Hebrews and remains a legal sovereign nation. Adhering only to the land specifically granted by God, they have not attempted to expand and colonize. Settlements, a disparaging misnomer for neighborhoods, are legal under the Balfour Declaration, San Remo Treaty, League of Nations’ Palestine Mandate (article 6), and the UN Security Council Resolution 242, as are parcels of land won in defensive wars. Israel’s population includes Jews (74.8%), Muslim (17.6%), Christian (2%), Druze (1.6%) and others (4%). There is legal documentation to substantiate Israel and her borders, as well as areas that are contested but not illegal.
In a letter to the Zionists, in 1917, Emir Faisal wrote, “We Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist movement” and “we will do our best, in so far as we are concerned, to help them through: we will wish the Jews a most hearty welcome home.” He added, “there exists room in Syria for us both and that neither can be a success without the other.” It was the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, an Islamist agitator and eventual Nazi collaborator, who demanded restrictions on Jewish immigration. He did not demand independence for Palestine, but reunification of Syria, and was the first of many to refuse to negotiate directly or enter any agreement with the Jewish people. Although today’s supporters of Palestinian statehood argue that the Palestinians have the right to self-determination, no such rights exist.
In stark contrast to Israel, the concept of land acquisition has been foremost for Islam through 1400 years, whether through outright war and extraordinary carnage or by way of deception and preying on the minds of the uninformed. Islam also relies on the acceptance and kindness of western humanity – schools, businesses, and naïve clergy’s penchant for tolerance and peace. Islamists have arrived by the hundreds of thousands with their Qur’anic imperatives to infiltrate but not to assimilate. They have false, libelous narratives for the guileless, disloyal, and obedient media to unfurl. Whether defined as an Israel issue or, more accurately, a Western issue, it is one that Teen Vogue champions.
Again, the complaint for Jewish “settlements” and housing is strictly territorial; Arabs have repeatedly refused to negotiate peace for a Palestinian state. When Bedouins illegally build on state-owned land, without permission or building permits, general planning or infrastructure, conducting illegal businesses, the world and media are silent. When Gazans teach their young to glorify violence and prepare for suicide among Jews, such magazines voice no objection. When Mahmoud Abbas names town squares after martyred jihadis who kill Jews, or awards new homes to families of the murderers, there are no protests. Teen Vogue mirrors the Islamic agenda.
Webster’s magazine article skirted Resolution 242, which calls for “withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict,” but not “all” the territories of 1967, and Israel had already withdrawn from 91% when it ceded the Sinai. Israel has no obligation to withdrawing from the Golan Heights in the absence of a peace accord with Syria, or return land won from Lebanon that attacked after 1967. Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Libya have no territorial disputes with Israel, yet condition their relations on the pre-1967 armistice lines. Palestinians are not mentioned in Resolution 242, and are not granted political rights or territory.
Webster referred to a “refugee” problem, but addressed only that of the displaced Arabs, not the persecution of 850,000 Jewish refugees who fled or were expelled from the Arab and Muslim lands where they had lived for thousands of years and resolution for property and compensation similar to what Arabs received. Webster evidently prefers a Palestinian state without Jews, while Israel is home to citizens of all faiths, including two million Muslims.
Teen Vogue’s purpose reinforces a sense of resentment already embedded in the minds of the young, unsophisticated readers. Previously primed by Common Core curriculum’s lessons made intentionally difficult, frustrating, and beyond their level of maturity, students are taught to feel, not to reason, and to react with dissatisfaction and anger. By early high school years, they have been immersed in Islamic prayers and studies, taught that Israel and America are inferior, and prepared to become the next generation of marching, rioting sympathizers. Discreditably, in addition to subsidizing hate, encouraging anti-Semitism, and helping to create a culture of street warriors, the magazine deceives the girls about how they would fare in the Islamic world.
Where is the magazine’s concern for teens across the Muslim and European worlds who are being raped and beaten by Allah’s warriors? Where is the concern for the girls who are doomed to live in a harsh culture, where they will endure painful disabling FGM, be shamed into living in shrouds, be forced into brutal marriages, made to bear children who will be converted into human bombs? Where is the concern that the invasion of unvetted foreign entities, from cultures so different from ours, who prey on our girls, their readers! If Teen Vogue delves into the political, why not expose the truth about the harshest culture on the planet?
Conde Nast’s introduction, signed by Dame Anna Wintour, publisher and chief, reads, “The foundation of Vogue’s leadership and authority is the brand’s unique role as a cultural barometer for a global audience. Vogue places fashion in the context of culture and the world we live in – how we dress, live and socialize; what we eat, listen to and watch; who leads and inspires us. Vogue immerses itself in fashion, always leading readers to what will happen next. Thought-provoking, relevant and always influential, Vogue defines the culture of fashion.”
Perhaps the clue to understanding Teen Vogue is the phrase, “global audience.” The staff looks to the globe for inspiration, not to America, our ethics and values. Hence, we see disrespect for America inherent in the articles, instilling in the teens a world view and the coming of an age of submission, and their acceptance of Sharia law over American law. Will the recent return of fashionable scarves now be transformed into hijabs on their models, and are our teens expected to return to the basic black dress of the 1950s – now floor length and complete with face covering?
It would be in their daughter’s and America’s best interest if the parents thoroughly reviewed Teen Vogue before considering the next subscription renewal.
Democrats Hoped to Hurt Trump, but Raised Suspicions of Obama
The disappointing thing about the hearing was that they never asked the right questions, it was almost like they didn’t really want to bring out things for some reasons … like the justice department change to the redaction and distribution of the information they had which lead to Flinn being caned
New York Times – Altering the News to Charge Trump
Armstrong Economics Blog/Media
Re-Posted Mar 21, 2017 by Martin Armstrong
What newspapers are doing between the Print and Online Versions is beginning to really question their integrity and reveals why mainstream media is just not trustworthy any more. So if you Google something, it’s the online version that will come up – not the print edition. So they can print anything and then post online something completely different to defeat a Google search and mislead the public once again.
The New York Times changed what they reported in the “print” edition that clearly stated “wiretapped data” monitoring Trump’s people before the election in Watergate Style probably after realizing what they said might hurt Obama. Why is there such a stark difference between online and the print edition? Obviously, this is not a mistake. It appears to be a deliberate alteration of reporting.
This strange difference between online and print editions of stories seems to be a pattern that is emerging more and more. Mainstream Media is really getting involved in some shady covert manipulation of the pretend news or modern version of propaganda. They are not as smart as they think.
The very night of the debut of the Forecaster in London, I was getting all sorts of emails from London with clients saying the London Evening Standard put out a story saying “City bankers are worth every penny of their huge bonuses” attributing it to me. When I went to the online version, it had a picture of a different Martin Armstrong. I responded to clients sending those emails that no, there were wrong. They corrected me photographing the print edition, which had MY PICTURE not someone else who was in the online version. At first, I assumed this was just a mistake. But this practice of putting out two different versions is becoming a commonplace manipulation.
In my case, it was the very night of the debut of the film. It was way too coincidental. Obviously, suddenly reporting some head-hunter for banks with the same name using that headline was to make people think the opposite of what the film was all about and not go see it. They could have ran that story any other time. There was nothing taking place in London that warranted such a story since the only critical issue about bankers was the film the Forecaster.
This ploy of putting out two versions completely different from the print edition and online edition is to give them deniability. The Washington Post they say Trump is wrong and the New York Times never said such a thing but links to the online version. So one lies and the other swears to it. The Washington Post boldly displays their motto – “Democracy Dies in Darkness” which is something they should practice for they are the dark force spreading darkness over the whole land. This manipulation of the news between the print and online versions is taking place more and more often and it always seems to take place during an issue in controversy – which even included my film. As I reported before, the company that bought the distribution rights for the USA refused to put in theaters. Then NETFIX senior management overruled and would not allow it to be shown on their systems. We live in a world of political censorship.
The mainstream media thinks they are clever. These are by no means a simple mistake. The New York Times changing the story for the online version is really showing how low the mainstream media will go to support the Democrats. This is just getting really disgusting. When the press becomes part of the conspiracy against the people, like Pravda (Truth) in Russia under the Communists, you know the state is failing. There would be no reason for the New York Times and the Washington Post to be manipulating the news this aggressively if the state was not failing.
What’s Collapsing? Socialism or Capitalism?
Armstrong Economics Blog/Economics
Re-Posted Mar 21, 2017 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Many people argue it is capitalism which is collapsing not socialism. How would your respond?
ANSWER: Those people who say this is a failure of capitalism and not socialism simply are trying to come up with an excuse as to why their dreams are not coming true. Democrats champion the poor and middle class but run to the rich for money. Why would bankers and hedge funds as well as Hollywood support Democrats if they are really hated so much? The answer is rather simple. They can bribe them for loopholes and favors.
The monetary and banking problems in the world today arise NOT so much from the failure of specific economic policies, but from deep-seated corruption and problems in institutional structures that have been created in response to socialism, which includes excessive regulation. Individuals clearly make mistakes in business but legislatures make bad laws and career politicians become detached from society, which is no different than any monarch. However, the institutions from which decisions and laws emanate are the core that determines the effectiveness of social operations and the value of social decisions. The more they create laws to solve an issue, they create other problems in the process.
Unless we change the immediate institutional structure of how government is designed, trying to impose centralized planning, we are not likely to get stable solutions to today’s economic-social problems. We exist between brief periods of economic stability and total government ineptitude resulting in erratic inflation and serious banking instability. The history of modern monetary and banking arrangements and government’s complete failure to manage society begs for meaningful reform. However, the likelihood of such reform is zero without the Crash & Burn, for he who holds the power in his hand will never let it go willingly.
The rhetoric against central banks clouds the issue. Government wants to spend other people’s money all the time, be they left or right. They only differance is on what to spend it on. However, they look to central banks to control the economy when they can only impact interest rates while money supply expands with velocity and contract when people lack confidence. The central bank has no possible power over fiscal spending and until the people stop complaining about central bankers and look at the whole problem, politicians will never be blamed for anything.
The impact of political interference on the workings of monetary and financial institutions is great under socialism implemented by people who have no experience whatsoever. Not surprisingly, many of our modern problems arise because politically generated structures are inappropriate to the real world. The hunt for money by government has cost billions in the private sector trying to cope with regulations to the point that the back offices in banks and risk management outnumber the the front offices actually doing business. This is only slowing down the economy and raising costs to the consumer who in turn only sees his living standard decline year after year.
Socialism is the code word for total government control and the diminishing world of human rights. People look at labels but are blind to the reality of what is being labeled. Is LIFE INSURANCE the same as FIRE INSURANCE that covers you in case of a fire? So LIFE INSURANCE is covering you in case you live forever or is it really death insurance? The nature of anything can be distorted by its label.
Why Obamacare is the Biggest Fraud in American History & Was Designed to Be Exactly That!
Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption
Re-Posted Mar 21, 2017 by Martin Armstrong
When we look at the markets and try to ascertain the long-term direction, we must look at politics closely, for this holds the key. First, this is a Private Wave and that means the confidence in government is collapsing. Hence, the question for the direction of stocks, gold, interest rates, and the world economy, all hinges on how fast the perception of government collapsed on a global scale. Both sides of the aisle are corrupt and rotten to the core. Republican or Democrat, they are all in this for what they personally can grab and they are incapable of doing anything right for society because power corrupts.
It was the Democrats who came up with the Social Security scheme and designed it to be exactly as a fraud that anyone in the private sector would do to jail for. They used the Ponzi Scheme model where you take money from one person and pay another so they think they have a profit and more and more people come to invest. Here they would impose a tax upon the younger generation to pay for the older generation while telling people they were paying into a retirement fund. Of course, Congress used the money to fund spending for other things and stuffed the fund with government bonds preventing it from ever investing.
Nancy Pelosi, one of the most vile corrupt Democrats in the party, actually said: “The Republican bill is one of the largest transfers of wealth from working families to the richest people in our country — Robin Hood in reverse.” Nancy Pelosi always bashes the “rich” when in fact she is constantly involved in money schemes and scandals with her husband. The scandals with Pelosi over money have been numerous. Her and her husband just walk on water and fill their pockets, for there is never enough for them. They have become notorious in real estate deals and install people in high places to get personal gains. They have been involved in insider trading in stock deals. She has steered projects in which she had a personal undisclosed interest. Her greed and scandals are endless, and many people in California want to secede from the United States because of Trump, yet they keep sending corrupt people to Washington like Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinstein. Even some of the delusional people in Silicon Valley urged to secede after Trump won.
Pelosi may be one of the most corrupt politicians in the Democrats after the Clintons. Her comment that the Republicans are proposing “one of the largest transfers of wealth from working families to the richest people in our country” is just amazingly so dishonest. The very design of everything the Democrats have set up has been based upon a transfer of wealth from one generation to another. The structural design of Obamacare is another Ponzi Scheme.
It was the Clintons who denied the youth the right to bankruptcy on student loans to support bankers who said they had no collateral. Then the bankers demanded parents still cosign for a loan and then they had their house and bankruptcy was eliminated. Even if students died, many bankers still demanded money from the parents. This is what the Democrats did for student loans – the greatest transfer of wealth from students to the bankers in history. Chuck Schumer and Hillary along with Bloomberg were all there to start the new Goldman Sachs building.
The Democrats have screwed the youth once again with Obamacare. Their criticism of the Republican fix is that older people will have to pay more. Why? Because Obamacare forced the youth to buy insurance they did not need. This is the greatest transfer of wealth from the younger generation into the pockets of insurance companies (not the rich) who lobby and give Pelosi money. Insurance company PACs always donate directly to Pelosi. Here is a list of the Insurance companies donating to the Democrats to keep Obamacare rolling and Starr Insurance is at the top.
There is no money going to the “rich”; it goes to insurance companies. My personal insurance doubled as did my deductible and then I have coverage for young children I do not have but it’s there by law and I have to pay for it. The joke has become that you can just walk into a bar and tell the girls to line up, no worries, you are covered for unlimited maternity leave and children and there is no marriage requirement or age limit. That may be the only way to get your money’s worth out of Obamacare! Of course I suppose I could just adopt all the children in some community and they would all be covered as well.
What if I donated enough money and got Pelosi to create a scheme where everyone has to have terrorist insurance by law. You all have to pay me $15 a month for life. I would make $4.5 billion a year, could give her $1 billion, and we are all rolling in the money except you with no risk of having to pay a claim. If there is a claim, just file for bankruptcy. Isn’t this Obamacare? The youth must buy insurance they do not need. I have insurance I must pay for, for children I do not have. All of this is supposed to cover people who cannot get insurance otherwise? Just put them on Medicaid and call it a day! Why trust insurance companies at all? I have NEVER in my entire life ever had a claim actually honored by any insurance company. They are all a FRAUD – period!
The scheme is always the same – take from one generation to pay another. The problem is, they keep piling more and more on top of the youth, who more than 60% cannot find a job with the bogus degree they are now indebted with, and their standard of living is the lowest of any generation to date. They cannot see the long-term damage they are doing and of course mainstream media support the Democrats without any honest analysis.
Centinel2012 