QUESTION:

Hi

I read this blog post and took a look at Nasa´s own homepage. Well, they are surely promoting this climate change hysteria.

What I would like to know is if it is declining according to these statistics how do they think they can get away with this scam?

Also when I look at the statistics it looks to me as if it´s actually increasing …?

Could you please explain

C

REPLY: The chart is the rate of change. These people are claiming this is a climate emergency. Taking NASA’s data, yes the PPM is rising but the rate of change has been declining. So there is no climate emergency. On top of that, the times where there have been spike correlate to war, not to the number of cars on the road. I have stated before that there is ABSOLUTE proof that carrots are deadly because every person who has ever eaten a carrot has eventually died. That is an undeniable correct statement. But omitted is the fact that even those who have never eaten a carrot has also eventually died.

The book that started all this nonsense was written by paleontologist Peter D. Ward entitled “Under a Green Sky” published in 2007. He theorized that the proposition of simply measuring the average CO2 concentration and concluding that CO2 was the reason for mass extinctions is a really questionable analysis. It is true that CO2 levels have been massively higher than they are today. Looking at his chart, we are at a historic low similar to the 5,000-year low in interest rates. Any uptick is by no means cause for the assumption that will become extinct in 12 years. Ward argued that the Permian Extinction event was distinguished with very high atmospheric CO2 (3,000 ppm) levels which created a runaway Greenhouse Effect. According to current measurements, we are at the 400 level.  There is not enough data to confirm his theory is correct.

Moreover, the 1930s saw the coldest period in modern history and that is when CO2 level rose the most. There was cooling, not warming. All the charts these people use are from 1850 forward. Historically, CO2 has been substantially higher well before the Industrial Revolution.

The chart I have shown is the rate of change, not the empirical level which they show. This is like a market that presses high but is running out of momentum. The rate of change is slowing down warning there is not climate emergency that these people are claiming.

I find it curious that the sharp increases in CO2 correlate to wars. It peaked in 1930s and began to decline. The 30’s were the coldest period.

COMMENT: Awesome !!!!

Yeah that’s you Martin !
National treasure

Also the Climate Change hysteria. I’ve been on that for 30 years. You are spot on.

I took 3 semesters of geology and ran the lab for my professor. He specialized in glaciology.

Martin I feel that outside of the deep state running the show and moving us into a confrontation with Russia, and a false launch, and im sure you know we have had several close calls, this climate change thing is i think in the top 5 threats to humanity. This has developed into a all encompassing religion (one completely devoid of sound science) that the globalist will use to control and limit humanity and impoverish us all.

Your assertions on this topic are spot on. My professor did actual field research in glaciology that clearly showed the mile thick ice in the Midwest.

I say to anyone who will listen, in order for me to buy what they are selling,i have to disregard much if my education from college and after from books I’ve read. Unbelievable how this deep state, media, educational
elite have deceived the people.

Enjoyed the emails – thanks Martin

R

REPLY: I find it amazing how people just embrace this climate change without any documentation. Geology has been a fascinating science and people do not understand that we can trace the movement of the polls based upon the magnetism of the rocks. There is something far more important than greenhouse gas and if everyone stopped having children, did not heat their home, stopped going to work, they are not going to change the fate of the planet. We are either the a fly on the rear-end of an elephant or at best a flea on a dog who finds us irritating. The planet in millions if not billions of years old and we have been around for perhaps 300,000 years.

The far more pressing issue is the risk of global cooling with solar minimum for that is when volcanoes seem to erupt on a simple correlation model. This is also perhaps when the polls flip. Even NASA is now forecasting the the next solar cycle will be the lowest in 200 years. Going into 2025, my concerns are definitely we will see a greater risk of drastic climate changes which they will distort into human caused rather than address a serious issue that may lead to major civil unrest.

COMMENT: Marty; Socrates has done a great job with the markets. But your forecasts that the winters would progressively get colder has beaten every forecast on the weather out there, and I have checked. This winter is setting records everywhere from Alaska to the Midwest. If what you have been forecasting for the next solar wave to be the lowest in hundreds of years, I think it is time to move south.

Keep up the great work.

MS

REPLY: The problem is these people supporting climate change began with a predetermined conclusion. That was wrong. So, now all they do is twist everything to pretend they are correct and claim the extreme colder is because of CO2 offering no evidence whatsoever. This is not scientific.

We have put the same CO2 data from NASA into our system. Socrates forecasts that as it does with over 1,000 markets we publish every day.  Here is a simple chart using the NASA data collected from Ice Cores and we plotted this out to ascertain if there any change that warrants such global hysteria. Taking the NASA data, unaltered by me, the annual rate of change in CO2 has been declining.

They are simply lying about the trend to push their agenda for population control. I have stated before, that was the very same theory behind the Wetlands legislation of the ’90s. At the White House Dinner, I was seated with all the Environmental groups. They admitted their real goal was to reduce the population. They have used CO2 to now further the same agenda which is total nonsense. This chart using the very same data they do demonstrates that the rate of change is declining, not increasing.

These people are dishonest, dangerous, and hell-bent on destroying the industrial revolution and want to send us all back to the stone age eliminating cars and airplanes in additional to ending heating and airconditioning why brainwashing girls not to have children.