Donald Trump Puts Reinstatement of Glass-Steagall Act Into 2016 Republican Party Platform…


I have a degree in economics and although I did nt take that road in privet life and have kept up with the field and the field move with the banking as it gave the idealists a way to get more money to cover up what they were doing to main street. This move my Trump is significant as Sundance writes here. Read this post several time and save it as it is a key point in saving the country.

Taxation Without Representation or Even Residency


Tax Robbery

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; The taxation of the internet seems to be rising. At the same time it appears as though this could really harm the economy by reducing competitiveness of small companies trying to comply with collecting taxes of so many different states. Have you looked at this as a possible factor in creating the next economic depression?

Thanks

BV

ANSWER: Absolutely. There is a tremendous clash of jurisdictions and governments are fighting for more and more taxes to pay government pensions. It has turned into a them against us confrontation and he who makes the rules typically wins until he provokes revolution. Most revolutions are ALWAYS over taxes as was the American and French Revolutions. The Supreme Court ruled in Quill Corporation v. North Dakota 504 U.S. 298 (1992) that there was nothing inherently unconstitutional about requiring out-of-state retailers selling over the internet to collect state and local sales taxes on orders shipped to in-state residents.  The only question was whether imposing such a requirement would cross the line from an acceptable burden on interstate commerce to an unreasonable one. That the Court did not decide. They claimed that technology had greatly eased the burden of collecting taxes for multiple jurisdictions, however, the Court concluded that Congress should make the call.

The ruling demonstrates how courts cannot be trusted to defend our liberty when those judging are appointed by the political machine. What if every state applied taxation based upon the same methodology that the Feds do. Lets say you were born in New York but moved to San Francisco. New York could then claim that since you were merely born there, you owe taxation to them on your income yet you use no services. California then imposes income tax on the theory you are a resident using services. Now you owe income taxes to two States plus the Feds. This would destroy the freedom of movement rapidly. Those who leave the United States suffer the same fate and owe taxes to the USA for the simple reason of their birth.

If the Congress enacted such a law demanding everyone on the internet are tax collectors for every possible taxing authority, the economy would collapse. Then cities could demand the same thing so places like Philadelphia or New York City that impose additional sales taxes of some kind would jump on the wagon and everything would collapse. Now you can see how revolution is born. Those in power always want more without regard for the consequences. This is why I have argued we MUST eliminate income taxes at the federal level and states must be restricted to their territory. No state has the right to impose any duty upon a non-resident of their jurisdiction – PERIOD. Forcing small business to collect taxes for every state would destroy small business and compels them to be quasi-government employees with criminal penalties for failure to comply, without any compensation.

The 2015.75 Crisis Moving into 2020.05


Crisis

The world financial crisis that is unfolding post-2015.75 is different from that which followed the 2007.15 peak in the ECM. As stated countless times, each event is a crisis in a different sector. The 2007.15 crisis was the over-leverage in real estate that the bankers created. This time, we are looking at the demise of governments. Under normal conditions, bond prices would be falling with interest rates in the public sector rising. We still see this unfolding in the peripheral markets. The markets where central banks have been buying government bonds to try to stimulate the economy has utterly failed and created a crisis beyond contemplation. We are looking at the collapse of government’s ability to issue debt as we move forward into this cycle. The only buying will be central banks at the end of the day – totally insane.

Bailout-R

The Sovereign Debt Crisis of the 1840s was the demise of the states, thanks to Andrew Jackson shutting down the Bank of the United States. This led to a banking crisis with individual states trying to support their banks. Because the states could not create money. The states issued debt to bailout the banks, but the crisis was far too massive, and as a result, the banks took down the state governments, which had no choice but to permanently default on their debt. This time, governments are trying bail-ins and this is causing confidence to collapse. Why should people trust banks at all? Once they hoard cash; that is it. The velocity of money implodes and you end up with an economic depression.

Draghai Euro CrisisTo answer all the questions about whether this will be covered at the World Economic Conference — of course. And to answer why we did not hold one in Berlin, yes, our models were warning about significant civil unrest in Europe as a consequence of the complete fiscal mismanagement of the ECB. It appears that the negative interest rates are totally insane. This is the complete incompetence of those who think they know how to manipulate society from Larry Summers to Mario Draghi.

These people will never admit a fatal mistake. Thus, we have to stand by and what Rome burn.

Banking Panic in Italy


Italy

We have reports from readers in Italy that ATM machines are being emptied. A run on banks is beginning in Italy.