Tag Archives: Cory Booker

Sep 25 2020

Billionaires and millionaires only have one vote


However these money, enthusiasm levels and wagering trails–coupled with expected poor Biden performances in the Presidential debates and more bombshell announcements from the President–seemingly point to a Trump second term

David Singer image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—September 24, 2020

Billionaires and millionaires only have one vote

Billionaires and millionaires donating large amounts to the Democratic Party hoping to see Biden beat Trump should be getting very worried.

Lucia Geng sums up their readiness to pour millions of dollars down the Democrats’ bottomless funding pit to lay the groundwork for requesting future favours from Biden and elected Democratic Party Senators, Congresspersons or even local State officials:

“Two super PAC spending titans, the Democratic Senate Majority PAC and GOP Senate Leadership Fund, ended August with $85 million and $126 million cash on hand, respectively, according to Sunday’s Federal Election Commission filings.

Those numbers are key because as both parties enter the home stretch of election season, a Democratic retaking of the Senate in November is seen by many as a solid possibility. FiveThirtyEight deemed Democrats “slight favorites” to take back the Senate, and Democrats are defending just 12 Senate seats compared to Republicans’ 23. 

The Democratic-aligned Senate Majority PAC is determined to make that possibility a reality. The super PAC is a top outside spending juggernaut: it’s spent the second-highest amount of any outside group on independent expenditures so far during this election cycle. The GOP-aligned Senate Leadership Fund is the third-highest outside spender this cycle; the two Senate super PACs rank second and third only to Priorities USA Action, a pro-Biden hybrid PAC.” 

Bad news for Democrats

However—the number of small donors giving $200 or less should be of great concern to those billionaires and millionaires backing Biden.

All donors only have one vote in the end—and Trump small donors are leaving Biden small donors trailing in their wake—as Just the News reports:

Trump raised $229.5 million among small donors compared to Biden’s $139 million, according to latest Center For Responsive Politics data. Biden has raised slightly more money ($187.3 million) than Trump ($183.9 million) among big donors. Trump and Republicans overall have outpaced Biden in total fundraising, with $505.4 million compared to $478.9 million.

Trump-supporters enthusiasm levels greatly surpass Biden-supporters enthusiasm levels—when one considers these two indicators:

  • The Republican National Convention was light years ahead of the Democrat’s National Convention in format, content and professional presentation.
  • Massive crowds at daily Trump rallies contrast sharply with Biden’s heavily controlled public appearances.

Even money being wagered on the Presidential result is bad news for Democrats.

Oddschecker reports on September 23, 2020:

Expected poor Biden performances in the Presidential debates

 2020 US election odds: The money keeps on coming for Donald Trump 

Despite 47% of UK bookmakers on the OddsChecker grids shortening the price for a Joe Biden win in the November election over the last 48-hours, the money keeps on flooding in for a Donald Trump victory. 

Donald Trump has dominated US election betting since the market opened, with the majority of bettors expecting him to extend his stay at the White House. However, the number of bets placed on Joe Biden and Donald Trump has levelled out slightly this month. The percentage of bets for Donald Trump in the 2020 US Election market has dropped from 58% in August to 52% in September. Joe Biden’s share has risen from 33.5% to 40% in the same time period. 

Trump’s 52% of the bets equates to 80% of money wagered—whereas Joe Biden’s 40% only accounts for 18.6% of money wagered. Whilst more gamblers are willing to back Biden—more people are willing to wager higher amounts on Trump.

These indicators run contrary to the conventional polls that have Biden consistently ahead.

However these money, enthusiasm levels and wagering trails—coupled with expected poor Biden performances in the Presidential debates and more bombshell announcements from the President—seemingly point to a Trump second term.

Sep 25 2020

FBI Finds Military Mail-In Ballots Discarded in Pennsylvania – All Ballots Cast for President Trump…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on September 24, 2020 by 

A rather disturbing report albeit on a comparatively small scale.   Federal and Pennsylvania state officials are reporting on nine mail-in military ballots cast for President Trump that were discarded by election workers in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.

Ironically, just yesterday President Trump asked all his supporters to get involved:

Pennsylvania, CBS – […] The U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Middle District of Pennsylvania says an investigation was launched Monday following reports of potential issues with a small number of mail-in ballots at the Luzerne County Board of Elections.

The FBI and Pennsylvania State Police have conducted interviews and recovered and reviewed physical evidence. Authorities say Luzerne County election officials have been cooperative.

Authorities can confirm that a small number of military ballots were discarded and investigators have recovered nine ballots so far.

Some of the discarded ballots can be attributed to specific voters and some cannot. Authorities say all nine ballots were cast for Trump.  The U.S. Attorney’s Office is continuing to investigate. (read more)

Sep 24 2020

The 800 Pound SOROS in the Room


Protect George Soros! Never criticize him! That’s what the so-called Main Stream Media (MSM) are telling us. It’s now no longer permissible to criticize the billionaire. Even Fox News wouldn’t allow it—they quickly shut up Newt Gingrich, who wanted to tell us how Soros was funding the campaigns of grass roots politicians who, once elected, carry out Soros’ anti-America agenda.

The socialists have already captured public education at all levels. Now they’ve completed their domination of all the major media arms including Silicon Valley social media. Soros has helped fund progressive organizations such as ‘Free Press,’ and ‘Media Matters’ to help twist minds toward his globalist, socialist agenda. These organizations openly strive for Marxism and ‘social justice.’

Our media have now become politicized. They are actively campaigning for Joe Biden. They excuse his dementia at every turn. Trump is constantly demonized no matter what he says or does. Increasingly, the elites at the top of the pyramid are given a pass by the media. Bill Gates, for example. Several of my cartoons critical of the Microsoft billionaire have been banned from Facebook and elsewhere. Why? Because Gates has purchased ‘science’ and anyone critical of Gates is thought to be spreading ‘fake news.’ In actuality, Gates is fake. He’s neither a scientist nor a doctor. He’s not a vaccine expert, but he’s got a gigantic wallet and therefore he gets to censor our free speech. Google will not allow some of my cartoons to pass through their gmail system—free speech among their users be damned.

Gates and Soros are public figures who spend countless millions of dollars funding their activism. As such, they are not immune from criticism, but the elite-owned fake journalists provide them with such immunity. Real journalists are shut up and/or locked up.

Soros is actively funding the destruction of America. He wants our country chained to the will of tyrants who run the world. Soros once said he wanted to be God. The media are making it a sacrilege to criticize him.

—Ben Garrison

Sep 24 2020

Everything the Media Claimed About Breonna Taylor’s Death Was a Lie – Truth Surfaces – No Police Charged in Her Death…


Posted originally on The Conservative tree House on September 23, 2020 by 

The media claimed Breonna Taylor was shot during a “no knock” warrant – False.
The media claimed Breonna Taylor was shot in her bed – False.
The media claimed Breonna Taylor was murdered – False.

Everything the media and lawyer Ben Crump claimed about the death of Breonna Taylor and the circumstances around her death was based on lies. The officials in Kentucky allowed a mountain of lies to grow until the evidence was finally presented to a grand jury and the Kentucky Attorney General was forced to admit the truth.

According to evidence revealed at a press conference by AG Daniel Cameron, the police executed a search warrant by knocking on the door. Breonna Taylor and her boyfriend Kenneth Walker refused to answer the door after the police identified themselves. The police broke down the door. Kenneth Walker was armed and shot first at police. The police returned fire and that’s how Breonna Taylor was shot and killed.  WATCH:

.

No police officers were charged with the death of Breonna Taylor because they were responding to being fired upon. It appears Mr. Walker used his girlfriend as a shield. One officer, Brett Hankison, who did not shoot any person, was charged with “wonton endangerment” for haphazardly firing 10 shots that entered the adjacent apartment unit.

 

Breonna Taylor’s killing set off months of protests in Louisville and other cities and drew national attention.  Celebrities and civil-rights activists demanding justice and urged Kentucky AG Cameron to bring charges against the officers involved.

Last week, the city of Louisville said it would pay $12 million to Ms. Taylor’s estate as part of a legal settlement with her family. The agreement also required the city to implement policy changes, including a mandate for police commanders to approve all search warrants.  Today the shooting was ruled justified as the police were responding to being fired upon by Ms. Taylor’s boyfriend Kenneth Walker.

Officials in Kentucky allows months of false claims to be made surrounding the shooting without correcting the media reporting.

As with the Trayvon Martin case…. and as with the Michael Brown case….. and as with the Freddie Gray case…. everything pushed by the media about the Breonna Taylor case was based on lies.  The media will now refuse to admit the truth and will now spin the narrative to claim they never reported incorrectly.  Absolutely ridiculous.

Sep 23 2020

Joe Biden’s Teleprompter Doesn’t Lie, Only He Does


His ‘Big Screen TV’, omnipresent Teleprompter proves it

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—September 22, 2020

Joe Biden’s Teleprompter Doesn’t Lie, Only He Does

Joe Biden’s Teleprompter doesn’t lie, only he does.

Biden, who the Democrats chose to run as president in order to appoint his vice president Kamala Harris to replace him as president after election, constantly tries to walk back what he’s saying out on the campaign trail—sometimes not remembering what it was he said or even what day it is.

But if you look at the picture above,  this is what Biden said about his intention to “crack down on employers who are trying to block or break down unions”.

The words, writ large on his Teleprompter on Saturday in his Hermantown, Minnesota Speech Transcript (rev.com)

Joe Biden: (35:08) “We should be spending the money to improve those schools and the safety of our children and our teachers. As I said, retrofitting four million buildings and weatherizing two million homes. And the way we do that is with the tax credits that we’re giving them again. All done by certified union labor. Look, I’ll fight for workers and unions at every step requiring all federal infrastructure projects to, one, pay prevailing wage, two, prioritize project labor agreements so collective bargaining is in place before the project starts, employee workers from registered apprenticeships. I won’t water them down like Trump tried to do. Pass the PRO Act to crack down on employers who are trying to block or break unions. (Emphasis CFP’s) And I’ll do it without raising anyone’s taxes if you make less than $400,000 a year. I gave my a word as … You have nothing to worry about if you make less than 400. If you-“

Most in the masses make far less than $400,000 a year.  Most in the masses are now on pandemic lockdown and are unable to get back to jobs they need to support their families.

At his Minnesota speech, Biden also blamed Trump for all of those who died of Covid-19:

Joe Biden: (18:38) “That’s been the entire story of Donald Trump’s presidency. Now, in the midst of this unprecedented national crisis, Trump has given up on even pretending to do his job. Almost 200,000 lives lost in the last six months. And experts tell us now, the same studies the administration’s relied on to predict what’s coming next, that we’re going to lose another 215,000 lives between now and January 1st. The United States has another 36,000 new COVID cases per day. Per day. Another average thousand deaths a day.

Joe Biden: (19:51)“So many lives lost unnecessarily because the President is only worried about the stock market and his reelection. He refused to do what you’re doing right here in this program, social distance, wear a mask, sanitize. You’re protecting your apprentices. He’s not protecting America.

Joe Biden: (20:09)“It’s estimated by the scientists that if we just wore masks nationally, we’d save a hundred thousand lives between now and January 1st. Let me say that again. If we just wore a mask nationally, we’d save a hundred thousand lives between now and January, according to the same study.

Joe Biden: (20:34)“And it was estimated by a great medical school, Columbia medical school, that if the President had just started one week earlier in March than he did, we’d have 36,000 more people sitting at the dinner table tonight, or being able to put your arm around grandpa or grandma tonight.

Joe Biden: (22:06)As I said last night in my hometown, I view this campaign as between Scranton and Park Avenue. All Trump sees from Park Avenue is Wall Street. That’s why the only metric of the American prosperity for him is the value of the Dow Jones. Like a lot of you, I spent a lot of my life with guys like Donald Trump looking down on me. Looking down on the people who make a living with their hands. People who take care of our kids, clean our streets.”

Fresh off his ‘gaffe’ of COVID killing 200 million Americans, Joe Biden’s sit down interview was wholly dependent on the teleprompter. His brain isn’t working. In this clip, after he says he’ll freeze deportations once he becomes president, he tells someone off camera, “I lost that line.” (IndependentSentinel, Sept. 21, 2020)

“As usual, he’s drawing teeny little crowds as Trump draws huge crowds and his teleprompter takes the place of a brain.

 

Joe Biden, presented in the media as a doddering old man who is cognitive challenged, is a liar.

His ‘Big Screen TV’, omnipresent Teleprompter proves it.

Sep 22 2020

Netflix’s Leftist Cuties


Like the Clintons, the Obamas have amassed a considerable fortune from politics. Also like the Clintons, they’re not going away. They continue to have an influence over politics and American culture. By becoming Netflix producers, the Obamas made sure their leftist propaganda gets attention.

Neither Michelle nor Barack have said anything about the Netflix program titled “Cuties,” in which young girls are shown in sexually charged poses on a glitzy stage. Susan Rice, a former Obama advisor, is on the Netflix board. She has also been reticent about what many are calling ‘pedophilia.’ Some say their silence is complicity. I agree.

Under Obama’s administration, the ‘trans’ mania began. Boys at high schools could pretend they were girls and win awards in athletic events. Restrooms suddenly became a problem. Then came the claim that there were dozens of genders and various sexual identifications. Anyone who objected got labeled as haters. Eventually, people became fearful. If they used the wrong pronoun or offended an easily offended trans-whatever, they could be fired, banned, or expelled.

I don’t know if Michelle Obama is a transgender or not. The matter is a long-running internet meme. That meme was reinforced when Joan Rivers casually said Michelle was a ‘tranny’ and that it was ‘okay.’ Days later she was dead. Maybe it was okay to her, but not to other powerful people who wanted to keep it under wraps. Even Barack himself has referred to Michelle as “Michael” on several occasions. There have been many who have said Barack Obama is gay. It’s plausible, but such speculation can also easily lead to social media bans.

Now the lying mass media are denouncing Q and his followers. They ridicule those who think there is such as thing as child trafficking and pedophilia occurring among the elite and powerful. Anyone who claims there are plenty of pedophiles pulling top levers of power must obviously be a conspiracy theorist, according to CNN, MSNBC, and all the rest. Yet a lot of evidence does exist. Epstein’s “Orgy Island,” for example.

The fact that the Obamas did not exert influence to stop a show containing obvious pedophilia can only mean they are complicit. Perhaps they want pedophilia to be normalized just as they wanted sexual dysphoria normalized. Meanwhile, they and their colleagues are doing their best to shut down Christians who object.

—Ben Garrison

Sep 22 2020

Who Will Really Run the Government Behind Biden?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics

Re-Posted Sep 22, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
Biden without his teleprompter is a disaster, but his vice president lets it slip calling it “a Harris administration together with Joe Biden.” Knowing what I know from dealing with Washington, as I have said before, ever since Bush Jr., there has been a deliberate intention to seek figure-heads only so those behind the scenes get to call the shots.

I have written many times before that they selected Bush Jr. deliberately because he had the name to win, but I was told he was “stupid” and they “needed” qualified people around him. That is how they selected Dick Cheney — it wasn’t Bush who selected his own staff. I have stated before that I was asked to take the position of Chief Economic Adviser, but declined because I would not be able to maintain my own company under such circumstances.

Even the Washington Post admitted that Obama “skipped more than half of his daily intelligence briefings in his first term. ” There has been an intentional effort to marginalize whoever is president. Trump did not fall into that category and that is why so many people hated him from Bolton, who wanted to invade the world, to Clapper & friends in the intelligence community. They want the perfect stooge — hence they are putting Biden up for president.

Who knows what the Deep State has in mind. Our model does not look well post-2022. Even Mueller’s team claims to have accidentally erased all their phones, which is obstruction of justice (i.e., Hillary). No one in government can be trusted anymore.

Sep 21 2020

Who pays for the damage brought by Black Lives Matter/Antifa?


Question: What American political entity has that relationship to BLM/Antifa? 
Answer: The Democrat National Committee, et. al.  And you might as well sue Mao.

Lee Cary image

Re-Posted from the Conservative Tree house By  —— Bio and Archives—September 20, 2020

 

Who pays for the damage brought by Black Lives Matter/Antifa?

Three posts from July 23-August 8, from this author, compare China’s Cultural Revolution to Black Lives Matter/Antifa.  The series began with:

“The Chinese Communist Party’s Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) was the precursor to today’s urban protests involving Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa. As America’s Cancel Culture spread into several Big Blue Cities, largely governed by Democrat politicians for decades, city officials stood back and let it happen.” (Links to parts 1, 2, and 3.)

China: During the winter of 1978-79, many victims of the Red Guards’ violence against people and property led to “a spate of highly personalized appeals for redress of grievances written by (or on behalf of) ordinary citizens who had suffered abuse at the hands of Leftists during the Cultural Revolution.’’ (”Burying Mao, Chinese politics in the Age of Deng Xiaoping,” Richard Baum, Princeton University Press, ©1994, p. 76)

Frustrated by long delays in receiving any response from Beijing, “thousands descended upon Beijing personally to press their grievances.  With official channels clogged and response times painfully slow, many petitioners took to the streets, posting handwritten appeals (known as xiaozibao, or ‘small character posters’) at Xidan, Tiananmen, and elsewhere…Most of the petitioners who descended on Beijing were poor, many were in dire straits. Some had traveled long distances on foot, carrying their possessions in knotted bundles; others had hitched rides into the cities on freight trains or trucks…In all, more than 100,000 out-of-towners descended upon Beijing and Shanghai in 1979, hoping to have their cases reopened…Despite government pledges to review all appeals objectively and impartially, many petitioners complained of receiving unfair treatment.” (Baum, p.76)

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), led by Chairman Mao Zedong, planned and launched the Cultural Revolution.

America: In the wake of the 2007-08 financial failure in America the saying that applied to the big banking institutions was: “Too big to fail.”
In the wake of the damage done by China’s Cultural Revolution, it was: “Too big to blame.”

What will we say when BLM/Antifa is over?

In the wake of the on-going damage to people and private property brought upon many of America’s Big Blue Cities (BBC) at the hands of (1) BLM street posters involving many white, both male and female, virtue-signalers between 17-27 years old, march through residential neighborhoods late at night, stall daytime traffic in downtown areas, and verbally intimidate evening diners in outdoor restaurants, paired up with (2) Antifa thugs dressed in all black who excel at destroying property and beating-up weaker people, we wonder: What will be America’s version of “The Petitioners’ Movement” in post-Cultural Revolution China?  

China: The Petitioner’s Movement happened when Chinese victims of the Red Guard sought redress for damages done to them and their property.  They eventually went to Beijing for redress, because they knew that’s where it all started.

The unspoken mantra for China’s Petitioners’ Movement was, essentially: “We can’t blame any one person, because that would mean blaming Chairman Mao. And he lives above blame.”

America: Can we count on the U.S. Department of Justice to prosecute and, when guilt is proven, punish those in the BLM/Antifa movement who injured persons and damaged private property?

Can we expect the Democrat-elected prosecutors in the BBCs to indict and try those who injured persons, and destroyed property? Perhaps a few—those not elected with Soros money.

So, who will hold those accountable for the carnage that continues to mount-up in the run-up to the General Election, and may escalate after November 3?

China: The CCP led by Mao Zedong gave the green-light to China’s Cultural Revolution.  Then stood back, and watched it unfold assuming a life of its own, free of any one person’s control.

It was to the CCP that many of the Cultural Revolution’s victims petitioned for redress for the physical and material damages they sustained. They knew the source, but prudence meant not saying it out loud.

America: Who will Americans petition for redress for the damages that BLM/Antifa brought into their communities?

Shall claims be directed at the big corporations, foundations, and wealthy individuals who seek to buy virtue by donating big money to the BLM/Antifa Movement? (Operationally, the organizations are two heads of the same snake.)

Should victims of the BLM/Antifa movement petition the U.S. Government for damages?  That would be like suing the United States Postal Service if one of their trucks hits your new car.

Perhaps those insurance companies that pay out tens-of-millions in damages to looted chain stores will consider recouping part of their loss by suits aimed at BLM’s growing financial assets?  But, no, that would tarnish their corporate image by putting the patina of white supremacists on their brand.

That leaves those small, independent businesses that sustained damage to seek redress at the local level. The same local level that let it happen.

Those physically and materially injured by BLM/Antifa may sue their local Blue government for not dispatching their tax-funded Police Departments to bring order to the chaos when it first began, instead of letting it get out of control. Perhaps some of the defunded police money could go to the destroyed small businesses. Or not.

Problem is, more than a few of those municipalities run perilously close to bankruptcy.  (See Chicago and NYC.)

To restate the question: How will America’s version of China’s “Petitioners’ Movement” seek to redress the damages done to persons and property by BLM/Antifa? 

In short, who pays?

In China, little was done for the victims of the Cultural Revolution. It was born a child of the one-and-only political party, and conceived in the mind of its near deity, Chairman Mao.

Question: What American political entity has that relationship to BLM/Antifa? 

Answer: The Democrat National Committee, et. al.  And you might as well sue Mao.

Sep 21 2020

Judge Amy Coney Barrett on the Short-List


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics

Re-Posted Sep 21, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Appellate Judge Amy Coney Barrett is at the top of the list for replacements for Justice Ginsberg. Like hydroxychloroquine, simply because Trump nominates her she will be vilified. She is a Catholic and already the Democrats are preparing to tear her apart based on her religions. After graduating from the University of Notre Dame’s law school at the very top of her class. In fact, in 1997, she graduated first in her class, which earned her the Hoynes Prize, the Law School’s highest honor which was very impressive with respect to her thinking process.

Amy then worked as a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia who was a strict constructionist. It was Scalia who pushed for reform in the way the courts were treating those charged. The jury was not determining every fact, and Scalia saw this as unconstitutional and argued this position until the rest of the court saw his constitutional argument. Finally, in APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY No. 99—478. Argued March 28, 2000–Decided June 26, 2000, Scalia defended the citizen’s right to a jury trial which had been eroded by the procedure.

In the Spirit Justice Ginsberg, Amy was the only female law clerk in the Supreme Court at that time. Besides being sitting on the court of appeals, she was also a University of Notre Dame law professor. Ironically, because she has been a dedicated mother of seven, her Catholic faith was turned against her by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein who questioned whether or not she could separate her religious faith from her duty as a judge. “The dogma lives loudly within you,” Feinstein said during the confirmation hearing for the Court of Appeals hearing. Barrett insisted that her professional beliefs and her religious beliefs would be kept separate. Ironically, the right to an abortion is deeply entangled with the right to privacy. In the recent case involving the anti-abortion law in Louisiana(1), even conservative Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. struck it down saying that respect for precedent compelled him to do so.

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. To understand the foundation of Roe v Wade and why it cannot be overturned without jeopardizing our right to privacy in the face of this contrived pandemic is critical. In 1965, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law banning the distribution of birth control to married couples, ruling that the law violated their implied right to privacy under the U.S. Constitution, GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT, 381 U.S. 479 (1965). How do you enforce that a married couple illegally used a condom during sex? Does an FBI agency have to watch? And in 1972, the Supreme Court struck down a law prohibiting the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried adults. Again, there is no way to enforce such laws without a government agent observing every sexual act.

To overturn Roe v Wade, would mean that the government can order you to take vaccines that violate your religion that even alter your DNA. While I would never condone an abortion personally, my personal belief cannot blind me to support overturning Roe v Wade opening the door to absolute tyranny. To do so would allow someone like Bill Gates to bribe politicians to pass laws to compel women to have Chips inserted to prevent pregnancy. It would be just one tiny step to then compel you to obtain permission from the government to have a child. They could just as easily impose an IQ test and determine you are not qualified to have children. Gates has already funded remote control birth-control by implanting chips into women. He is obsessed with population control.

The US Supreme Court actually upheld the eugenics views of the in Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), where the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., actually ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court actually wrote: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell,  274 U.S. 200 (1927). This case has not been overturned, but if it were challenged, then the same right to privacy from which Roe v Wade stands would come into play. Overturn that case, and a lot more tyranny will follow. The only possible way to overturn Roe v Wade must involve the Due Process Right to life and liberty without somehow overturning the right to privacy. That can be a real Pandora’s Box.

Suspension and Delegation Amy Coney Barrett

After reading some of her decisions and this article she wrote regarding the Suspension Clause, I believe she would NOT overturn Roe v Wade simply because of her religion. Here she clearly states that she believes that the statutes involved, which have never been activated since the Civil War domestically, delegate too much discretion to the President. Her reasoning falls in line with Strict Construction championed by Scalia, and therefore I would support her.  I believe the far more important question turns on her view of the power of government. She is not a rubber stamp and that is vital to our liberty in the future. I will note, for those who will say I support here only because she is a conservative nominated by Trump, I reviewed the decisions of Brett Kavanaugh and stated on this blog that I would have voted against his nomination.

POLITICO, the leftist view, as usual, states: “Barrett has stated that “life begins at conception,” according to a 2013 Notre Dame Magazine article. She also said that justices should not be strictly bound by Supreme Court precedents, a deference known as stare decisis, leaving open the possibility that she could vote to overturn Roe v. Wade if seated on the court.” Their view is to hell with every other issue, it’s all about abortion exclusively.

Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi who is in the House, not the Senate which decides appointments to the Supreme Court, has bluntly stated that she doesn’t rule out impeachment to delay Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court. She is so out of her mind and is clearly engaging in the Obstruction of Justice. She is in the House – not the Senate. The House does not preside of these appointments. As a matter of law, she or any senator is not allowed to ask a judge how they would vote on abortion. The Senate is not permitted to nominate a person based upon a prearranged vote. Chief Justice Roberts, a conservative appointed by President Bush, upheld Obamacare. It is often a matter of constitutional law and trying to guess how Barrett will vote exclusively on abortion is impermissible constitutionally. This assumption is discrimination based upon the fact that she is Catholic and has 7 children, two of whom are adopted from Hati.

Diane Feinstein is running again and she 87 while Nancy Pelosi is 80. These two women liberationists from the 60s no longer represent women today. They are traditionally anti-religion and Feinstein’s question of Barrett before illustrates her hatred of not just religion, but the fact that Barrett even has 7 children which she finds obviously disgusting.

  1. JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. ET AL. v. RUSSO
Sep 19 2020

Prosecute George Soros for Plotting Anarchy,  Violating U.S. Code § 2383. Rebellion or Insurrection


Fox Weirdly Defends Ultra-Evil Tycoon Soros Funding Antifa Riots & Progressive DA’s

Kelly OConnell image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—September 18, 2020

 

Prosecute George Soros for Plotting Anarchy,  Violating U.S. Code § 2383. Rebellion or Insurrection

Intro: George Soros, Violently Ambitious Progressive

Silence fell at Fox News as Newt Gingrich asserted the main problem facing US riots was billionaire George Soros buying DA races. The  female hosts immediately howled to censure Gingrich, who said: “It’s verboten?!!” So is Fox beholden to Soros? Why? Meanwhile, crime skyrockets in liberal states and cities that elected Soros DAs. Soros is accused of plotting to control the globe through shadow officials in various countries. Soros and devotees offer a classic study of folie à deux, sharing the mad belief they’re called to convert the globe to Marxism

Open Society

Soros started Open Society Foundation, donating $30 billion to “upgrade” world democracy, Soros is condemned in native Hungary, his university banned, and rejected for insisting mass illegal migrants be housed, Soros currently funds leftist US District Attorneys.  “The Soros groups dump large amounts of money in the final moments of the campaign. The Soros funds are only discovered after the election.”

Nonagenarian Soros Desperate to Transform America

90-year-old Marxist Soros oozes delusions of grandeur seeing himself a leader of world revolution, his leftist mania drives his American DA project. For years Soros regularly invested in DA races. Observe incompetent Kim Foxx & $2 million Soros funds, dismissing without comment Jesse Smollett’s case with overwhelming evidence of guilt. Such abuse of justice tells average citizens fairness is impossible.

US Liberal District Attorney Project

Investing in important DA races, Soros waits to inject last minute blasts of cash for liberal candidates. Over years, Soros spent millions in races like Chesa Boudin, San Francisco; Larry Krasner, Philadelphia; Houston’s Kim Ogg, and Diana Becton, Contra Costa County. All “Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commissions” idealists. Florida’s Soros financed State Attorney Aramis Ayala announced no death penalties would be sought for any case. Portland’s Mike Schmidt, Soros DA refuses to prosecute 110-day Portland rioters.

San Francisco, Liberal Hell

Boudin, the SF Public Defender, promised before his election: “We will not prosecute cases involving quality-of-life crimes, such as public camping, offering or soliciting sex, public urination, blocking a sidewalk, etc., should not and will not be prosecuted. We have a long way to go to decriminalize poverty and homelessness. There can be no justice when we utilize prison and jail as the solution to all of our problems.” Overall, Soros DAs have helped turn the biggest West Coast cities into third world countries as residents despair and flee.

Soros’ Mental Health & History
Jewish Soros diabolically admitted the zenith of his life was carting off innocent Jew’s property after dispatch to concentration camps. Is he a Sociopath or Psychopath? Why does Soros undermine American law? Marxists know an increasingly out-of-control a society begs for more government intervention. Liberal Soros Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner of St. Louis watched her city’s crime spike to highest in America.

Conclusion: DOJ Should Prosecute Soros for Bribery, Undue Influence & Undermining Constitution

Hungary’s PM Viktor Orbán likened Soros to Soviet propagandists: “We old warhorses recognize them by their smell.” The DOJ must prosecute the megalomaniac for attempting to overhaul the US Justice System. Soros is bribing candidates to follow his law-enforcement ideas in exchange for campaign funds and future support. If Soros’ groups break down society by organizing and funding treason, etc, they are violating U.S. Code § 2383. Rebellion or Insurrection, punishing anarchy undermining the law. It’s time Soros is finally stopped in his insane bid to castrate the US Constitution and supplant America’s justice system with devilish Marxism.