I really hope that this is NOT TRUE!
It is worse than this please take a look at my latest post https://centinel2012.com/2015/07/20/nasa-giss-table-loti-cannot-be-correct/ Comments and suggestions are welcome! Especially if you can show i am wrong!
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist, contends that Muslim violence and rape, and that Muslim rage and aggression as well as Muslim irresponsibility, stem from Muslim or Islamic beliefs.
If this diagnosis is correct, we would have to conclude that Islam, above and beneath the surface, is a pathological and psychotic creed. This obviously has grave consequences, especially for Israel and America.
First, it means that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in negotiating for years with Mahmoud Abbas, the Muslim leader of the Palestinian Authority, has been dealing with a man whose Islamic beliefs render him a split personality, whereby the disparity between his words and deeds is not the result of hypocrisy – a common frailty – but of (unseen) schizophrenia.
Second, since Barack Obama is a self-professed Muslim, this means that the American people have twice elected a morally obtuse and irresponsible person as their President.
Since a person of Obama’s Islamic ethnocentric beliefs excludes natural rights, he thereby excluded “infidels” from any rights. Hence he cannot reliably distinguish right from wrong from a universalistic perspective. And since Obama also purveys the multicultural moral relativism prevalent in academia, this too will render him psychologically disinclined to disparage a Muslim as a terrorist.
Obama’s ethnocentric vacuity and moral insensitivity explains (1) his returning a statue of Winston Churchill to London; (2) his boycotting the anti-Islamic demonstration in Paris; (3) his hostility toward Israel; (4) his appointing Muslims to Executive departments and agencies, including Homeland Security and the CIA; and (5) his support of Iran despite its nuclear weapons program, and despite its threat to Western civilization.
Wafa Sultan was right in saying Islam is not a civilization. Lee Harris was right in saying Islam is the greatest enemy of civilization. From this I conclude that Islam manifests what is nothing less than religious nihilism, which is personified by Barack Obama, the occupant of the White House!☼
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Nicolai Sennels, Danish psychologist, contends that Muslim violence and rape, Muslim rage, aggression and irresponsibility, stem from Muslim beliefs, Islamic beliefs.
If this diagnosis is correct, we would have to conclude that Islam is a pathological – perhaps more precisely – a psychotic religion. There is a great deal of collateral evidence supportive of this seemingly extreme, not to say “racist” conclusion, if only because there are about 1.5 billion Muslims on planet earth; and some estimate that as much as 80 percent support Jihad – killing “infidels”!
The Center for the Study of Political Islam makes this high estimate of jihadists quite plausible. According to its February 21, 2007 issue of FrontPageMagazine, Muslims have slaughtered approximately 270 million people since the ascendancy of Muhammad!
Such slaughter is encouraged by Islam’s bellicose nature. One of its most distinctive religious imperatives is Jihad. Indeed, exterminating “infidels” is encouraged by Islamic scriptures.
Moreover, a love of death – necrophelia – call it psychotic nihilism, animates Islamic absolutism. This nihilistic love of death is manifested in Sura 9:111 of the Qur’an, which exalts the Muslim who “slays and is slain for Allah.”
The psychotically violent nature of Islam is surely the basic reason why Syrian-born psychiatrist Wafa Sultan, now living in America, does not regard Islam as a civilization.
The philosophically astute Lee Harris, who rejects cultural relativism, defines civilization in terms of four prerequisites: (1) a stable social order, (2) the co-operation of individuals pursuing their own interests, (3) the ability to tolerate or socialize with one’s neighbors, and (4) a hatred of violence.
To the preceding I would add (5) a respect for truthfulness, a quality precluded by the Muslim doctrine of taqiyya, which exalts deceit and dissimulation as virtues. Islam thus lacks the prerequisites of civilization. Hence it is all the more remarkable that Syrian-born Dr. Wafa Sultan arrived at the same conclusion!
It’s obvious from the preceding remarks that Islam and the West represent a “clash of civilizations,” which the ever correct and cautious PM Netanyahu denied in speech to a joint session of the American Congress on July 10, 1996.
Now, in view of the preceding historical facts and considerations, it should be obvious to any honest observer that genuine negotiations leading to abiding agreements between a nation like Iran, on the one hand, and the United States, on the other, are psychologically, politically, and culturally impossible.
This obviously applies to the “peace process” that has deviously described the relationship between Israel and the factitious Palestinians during the past twenty-two years.
Anyone for truth?
The Donald Doubles Down on His “McCain Not a War Hero” Statements
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
Over the weekend, “the Donald” backed down on his attacks on McCain, calling “Hanoi John” a “war hero.”
However, Donald is not going to be able to close the can of worms he opened. Today, McCain is trying to wrap himself in the POW flag for cover. POWs had never been rock star heroes before, quite the opposite. These are people who surrendered to the enemy, people suspected of collaboration and worse. With Korea, POWs became the shame of America with many “brainwashed” into following communist doctrines.
American POWs from Vietnam were the bloody flag Richard Nixon wrapped himself in, on the advice of Henry Kissinger, part of a ploy to divert attention from his endless personal failings which included his agreement with North Vietnam that let them keep and later execute hundreds of American POWs. 1205 American POWs were kept by North Vietnam according to records recovered at the end of the Cold War. President’s Clinton and Yeltsin instituted a search of Russia’s gulags looking for their remains with no success. In 1993, armed with testimony from a former high ranking Czech security official, I proposed a systematic search of archives in Prague that recorded the fate of 200 missing US POWs from Vietnam but was blocked by Senator John McCain.
33 POWs faced execution for treason after Vietnam until Nixon pardoned all POWs. McCain was on the list of the 33, in fact at the head of it.
Here are the facts as we know them:
These 4 accusations are the only real and supportable accusations against McCain. The evidence for these acts exists and is substantial. What is stranger still is McCain’s longtime war against veterans, other POWs and their families. When John was a bit younger and better capable of looking after himself, he was often both verbally and physically abusive to POW families, POW activists and veterans. We hear nothing of these brutal outbursts of McCain’s though they continue to this day, now taken as the ravings of a mental defective.
The door Donald opened should be kept open. We need to examine the POW phenomenon. After Vietnam, we allowed Nixon to glorify POWs while abandoning hundreds. The facts came to light during the late 1990s when tapes of conversations between Nixon and Kissinger were made public, for moments, with Kissinger admitting that American POWS held outside North Vietnam, in Laos, Cambodia and the South, were purposefully not included in the agreements, a number Kissinger put at over 200.
These tapes were cleaned from the media and are not available to even researchers, were such interested parties to exist, which they do not.
Vietnam was a useless war. I served in Vietnam as a Marine combat infantryman and know the war well close up.
Those of us that served felt abused and exploited and suffered far worse at the hands of Nixon and subsequent leaders who backed away from those of us who served as honorably as possible while engaging in a nutty frenzy of POW worship.
Trump is right, those who surrender are generally not heroes. Some were however, like Ted Guy, a man taken on the ground fighting, killing 4 of his captors.
Guy, however, is only one of many thousands, many many thousands, from Vietnam that should have received some aspect of recognition in a war where many more thousands lived like gods. Vietnam was a scam, drugs, prostitution, black market, the best food and hottest parties in the world for many who came home from the war with medals on their chests for doing nothing whatsoever.
I might add, the Saigon press club war correspondents were the worst of all, living like kings on little boys and little girls while being occasionally flown for “10 minutes of war” with a general, then back to the clubs and brothels. They all should have been locked in FEMA camps, were such things to exist.
As for the Donald, he should demand that, minimally, the American public be able to hear McCain’s broadcasts and see the records of his debriefing and read the statements made against him by other POWs, including and especially Colonel Ted Guy.
This man, if you wish to call him that, “McCain” has been allowed to destroy America’s security for two generations, along with friends like “light loafer Lindsey” Graham and others.
In one instance alone, the F35, McCain has personally destroyed America’s defense capabilities for 25 years. This is his plane, his project, his monstrosity.
There hasn’t been a defense scam in decades that hasn’t had his hand prints on it. Time for Trump to get serious and show some backbone. McCain is a hard target, time for Trump to stop bashing the easy guys and take this one on.
Something has been bothering me about the NASA-GISS LOTI data table for a long time now, and I don’t mean the data manipulation which we all know is there. NASA publishes a table of values representing the global temperature of the planet supposedly based on actual measurements. The problem I saw in their data was the large swings in their numbers on a month to month basis; at a local level yes, of course, but on a global level the changes would have to be very gradual because of the very large numbers involved in the energy content of the atmosphere.
Last week I decided to try and calculate the heat value of the NASA LOTI changes and so from Wikipedia we find that the dry atmosphere is 5.1352E+18 kg and the water is 1.27E+16 kg for a total of 5.1479E+18 kg. with that all that was needed was a heat value and so a Google search brought up a guest post on WUWT from April 6, 2011 by Jeff Id from his the Air Vent blog where a thermal analysis was completed for a different purpose but in the post was the number I was seeking of 1005 Joules per degree Kelvin for the heat value of the Earth’s atmosphere.
The next step was to take the most current (at the time this was written) NASA LOTI values from January 1880 to June 2015 and place them in a spreadsheet it was then simple to calculate the heat value of each months anomaly for example for January 1880 the value was 1.48193E+21 Joules and for June 2015 the value was 1.48728E+21 Joules. There were 1625 values in the LOTI table; because of the large number of values the line width was set to zero to make it readable and the scale is in mega joules. A second chat was added from January 2000 to the present so that more detail can be seen
It’s clear when looking at this chart that there are extremely large monthly energy flows involved here if the NASA numbers are actually valid. To put this in perspective four lines were added to this chart for the incoming solar radiation using the following albedo percentages 0.0%, 20.0%, 30.6% and 40.0% and using 1368 Wm2 for solar radiation at the earth’s orbit adjusted to 342 Wm2 to compensate for the spherical earth. Obviously the Wm2 had to be converted to Joules we used 2,592,000 seconds for the conversion since we were looking a monthly changes.
With that done we can see that the monthly NASA-GISS energy flows far and away exceed any possible variation in the planets albedo and so the values in the NASA-GISS table LOTI cannot be correct.
I would appreciate feedback on this analysis as there are serious implications to the integrity of the NOAA and NASA published data!
Re-Post from the Powered Wig Society by Thomas Madison July 19, 2015
By Thomas Madison
Considering John McCain’s vulnerability regarding his past, it is probably in his best interest to shut up, and certainly he would be wise to avoid insulting fellow Republicans, especially Donald Trump. Let’s review:
1. John McCain was a below average student, getting into the Naval Academy due to his father’s and grandfather’s influence and naval careers. Both were admirals. McCain was a boozing, smoking, womanizing party animal, graduating fifth from the bottom of his class at Annapolis.
2. John McCain’s arms were broken not from being tortured by the North Vietnamese, but when he improperly ejected from his plane over North Vietnam. According to his fellow prisoners he was never tortured by the North Vietnamese.
3. John McCain’s nickname amongst his North Vietnamese captors was Songbird, as he was eager to tell them anything they wanted to hear to avoid torture. It is claimed that he made 32 propaganda videos for the North Vietnamese in which he blamed the United States for targeting schools, temples, orphanages, and hospitals. McCain has admitted to making one propaganda video. This puts him in the Jane Fonda class.
4. John McCain’s first marriage ended in divorce after his wife left him because of his many affairs with other women.
5. John McCain was the major obstruction to the passage of key POW/MIA legislation, which would have released classified records regarding these men and their fates.
6. John McCain has been a career beltway parasite since the mid 80s.
7. John McCain supported Barack Hussein’s war in Syria, which the American people overwhelmingly rejected. He even went to Syria to hang out with the rebels, who he claimed were not terrorists. Today they go by another name – ISIS.
8. John McCain is a global warming alarmist. While the majority of the rest of the world, including most of the scientific community, has rejected the notion of global warming, McCain and fellow believers Al Gore and Barack Hussein continue to preach the gospel. Actually, we all know they don’t believe it. They just see a barrel of money there.
This is a good post that I just found.
The analysis and plots shown here are based on the following: first NASA-GISS temperature anomalies (converted to degrees Celsius so non-scientists will understand the plots) as shown in their table LOTI, second James E. Hansen’s Scenario B data, which is the very core of the IPCC Global Climate models (GCM’s) and which was based on a CO2 sensitivity value of 3.0O Celsius, lastly, a plot based on an alternative climate model designated ‘PCM’ and based on a sensitively value of .65O Celsius.
An explanation of the alternative model designated PCM is in order since many have interpreted this PCM model as a statistical least squares projection of some kind and nothing could be further from the truth. A decade ago when I started this work the first thing I did was look at geological temperature changes since it is well known that the climate is not a constant; I learned that in my undergrad geology and climatology courses in 1964.
The following observations give a starting point to any serious study. One there is a clear movement in global temperatures with a 1,000 some year cycle going back at least 3,000 to 4,000 years; probably because of the apsidal precession of about 21,000 years for a complete cycle. However about every 10,000 years the seasons are reversed making the winter colder and the summer warmer (northern hemisphere) 10,000 years from now the seasons will be reversed. Two there are also 60 to 70 year cycles in the Pacific and the Atlantic oceans that are well documented. Lastly we also know that there are greenhouse gases such as Carbon Dioxide and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) estimated that Carbon Dioxide had a doubling rate of 3.0O Celsius plus or minus 1.5O Celsius in 1979
The core problem with the current climate change theory is that the IPCC still uses the NAS 3.0O Celsius as the sensitivity value of Carbon Dioxide and a number in that range is required to make the IPCC GCM’s work. The problem with using this value is it leaves no room for other factors and hence the need of the infamous Hockey Stick plots of the IPCC from Mann, Bradley & Hughes in 1999. The PCM model is based on a much lower value for Carbon Dioxide consistent with current research which places the value between 0.65O and 1.5O Celsius per doubling of Carbon Dioxide. If the long and short movement in temperatures and a lower value for Carbon Dioxide are properly analyzed and combined a plot that matched historical and current (non manipulated) NASA temperature estimates very well can be constructed. This is not curve fitting.
The PCM model is such a construct and it is not based on statistical analyses of raw data. It is based on creating curves that match observations (which is real science) and those observations appear to be related to the movement of water in the world’s oceans. The movements of ocean currents is well documented in the literature all that was done here was properly combine the separate variables into one curve which had not been previously done. Since this combined curve is an excellent predictor of global temperatures unlike the IPCC GCM’s it appears to reflect reality a bit better than the convoluted IPCC GCM’s which after the past 19 years of no statistical warming have been shown to be in error.
Now, to smooth out highly erratic monthly variations a 12 month running average is used in all the plots. This information will be shown in four tables and updated each month as the new data comes in about the middle of the month. Since no model or simulation that cannot reasonably predict that which it was design to do is worth anything the information presented here definitively proves that NASA, NOAA and the IPCC just don’t have a clue.
The first plot, UL is a plot of the NASA temperature anomaly converted to degrees Celsius and shown in red with a black trend line added. There has been a very clear reversal in the upward movement of global temperatures since about 2001 and neither the UN IPCC nor anyone else has an explanation for this 13 years later. Since CO2 has continued to increase at what could be argued an increasing rate this raises serious doubts about the logic programmed into all the IPCC global climate models.
The next plot UR, also in red, shows the IPCC estimates of what the Global temperature should be, based on Hansen’s Scenario B, with the NASA actual temperatures’ subtracted from them. Therefore this plot represents a deviation from what the Climate “believers” KNOW what the temperature should be; with a positive value indicating the IPCC values are higher than actual and a negative value indicating the IPCC values are lower than actual, as measured by NASA. A black trend line is added and we can clearly see that the deviation from expected is increasing at an increasing rate. This makes sense since the IPCC models project increased temperatures based primarily on the increasing level of CO2 in the earth’s atmosphere. Unfortunately, for them, the actual temperatures from NASA are trending down (even as they try to hide the down ward movement with data manipulation) since other factors are in play, therefore each year the gap between them widens. Since we have 13 years of observations’ showing this pattern it becomes hard to justify a continuing belief in the IPCC climate models, there is obviously something very wrong here.
The next plot LL shown in blue is based on the equations in the PCM climate model described in previous papers and posts here and since it is generated by “equations” a trend line is not needed. As can be seen the PCM, LL, and the NASA, UL, trend plots are very similar the reason being that in the PCM model there is a 68.2 year cycle that moves the trend line up and then down a total of .30O Celsius (currently negative .0070O Celsius per year); and we are now in the downward portion of that trend which will continue until around 2035. This short cycle is clearly observed in the raw NASA data in the LOTI table going back to 1868. Then there is a long trend, 1052.6 years with an up and down of 1.36O Celsius (currently plus .0029O Celsius per year) also observed in the NASA data. Lastly there is CO2 adding about .005O Celsius per year so they basically wash out which matches the current holding pattern we are experiencing. However within a few years the increasing downward trend of the short cycle will overpower the other two and we will see drop of about .002O Celsius per year and that will be increasing until till around 2025 or so. After about 2035 the short cycle will have bottomed and turn up and all three will be on the upswing again. These are all round numbers shown here as representative values.
The last plot LR in blue uses the same logic as used in the UR plot, here we use the PCM estimates of what the Global temperature should be with the NASA actual temperatures’ subtracted from them. A positive value indicates the PCM values are higher than actual and a negative value indicates the PCM values are lower than expected. A black trend line was added and it clearly shows that the PCM model is tracking the NASA actual values very closely. In, fact since 1970 the PCM model has rarely been off by more than +/- .1 degrees Celsius and has an average trend of almost zero error, while the IPCC models are erratic and are now approaching an error rate of +.5O above expected.
Note: Since I first started posting this monthly analysis a year and a half ago NOAA and NASA were directed make the global temperatures fit the political narrative that the planet was over heating and something drastic need to be done right now. The problem was as shown in this analysis the “real” world temperatures were not at the level that the IPCC GCM’s said they should be. Major adjustments to the data have been made that give the illusion that temperatures are going up even though they are not. However as this analysis shows even with the manipulation that has destroyed all credibility from NOAA and NASA they cannot get the global temperatures even close to what their false theory claims they should be.
In summary, the IPCC models were designed before a true picture of the world’s climate was understood. During the 1980’s and 1990’s CO2 levels were going up and the world temperature was also going up so there appeared to be correlation and causation. The mistake that was made was looking at only a ~20 year period when the real variations in climate move in much longer cycles. Those other cycles can be observed in the NASA data but they were ignored for some reason. By ignoring those trends and focusing only on CO2 the models will be unable to correctly plot global temperatures until they are fixed.
Lastly the next Chart shows what a plot of the PCM model would look like from the year 1000 to the year 2300. The plot matches reasonably well with history and fits the current NASA-GISS table LOTI date very closely, despite homogenization. I understand that this model is not based on physics but it is also not curve fitting. It’s based on observed reoccurring patterns in the climate. These patterns can be modeled and when they are you get a plot that works better than any of the IPCC’s GCM’s. If the conditions that create these patterns do not change and CO2 continues to increase to 800 ppm or even 1000 ppm than this model will work into the foreseeable future. One hundred fifty years from now global temperatures will peak at around 15.5 to 15.7 degrees C and then will be on the downside of the long cycle for the next 500 years. The overall effect of CO2 reaching levels of 1000 ppm or even higher will be between 1.0 and 1.5 degrees C which is about the same as that of the long cycle.
Carbon Dioxide is not capable of doing what Hansen and Gore claim!
The purpose of this post is to make people aware of the errors inherent in the IPCC models so that they can be corrected.
The Obama administration’s “Need” for a binding UN climate treaty with mandated CO2 reductions in Europe and America means there will be such a resolution presented at the COP12 conference in Paris in December. To support this NASA will be forced to show ever increasing global temperatures for the rest of 2015 that will make less and less sense based on observations and satellite data which will all be dismissed or ignored.
Sir Karl Raimund Popper (28 July 1902 – 17 September 1994) was an Austrian and British philosopher and a professor at the London School of Economics. He is considered one of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century, and he also wrote extensively on social and political philosophy. The following quotes of his apply to this subject.
If we are uncritical we shall always find what we want: we shall look for, and find, confirmations, and we shall look away from, and not see, whatever might be dangerous to our pet theories.
Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve.
… (S)cience is one of the very few human activities — perhaps the only one — in which errors are systematically criticized and fairly often, in time, corrected
Barrack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton along with George Soros and the rest of the Progressive Clan embarked on a quest to remake America into something other than what it was decades ago. Their vision born during the late ‘60s and early ‘70s was molded from the writings or Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Many others contributed to their vision of an enslaved people under their rule but this is not a detailed academic paper; it’s just an opinion piece.
Before I start I must add the when I joined the US Army after graduating from college in 1965 and got my commission and became a Green Beret I never envisioned that what we were then trained to combat would in the future be happening to the country I so loved. One must understand that back then Green Berets were not “Commandos” we were way more than that. Just to get in you needed to be Hi IQ and physical fit both enlisted and officer but more importantly be able to operate independent of the regular Army command structure.
We were small teams of 12 men who were trained to be able to take down an entire country. Yes we knew weapons and explosives and military tactics but more importantly we knew how to work with the people in a country and show them how to take over their country and create a new government that wasn’t oppressive. Hence our motto De Oppresso Liber It is United States Army tradition that this phrase in Latin is considered to mean “to free from oppression” or “to liberate the oppressed”, in English; A literal translation of the phrase de oppresso liber would be “from (being) an oppressed man, (to being) a free one”.
Why does this matter? Well that training allows us; the older Beret’s to see that what is going on in America is the very thing we were fighting to stop in other countries. Back then the states and local governments took care of the people and the federal Government was more closely following the intent of the founders to leave the people alone, it was none of the business of the fed’s what we did. Were there things that could have been better, of course, we are mortals and not Gods but what we had was the best system ever devised by man.
But there are always those that wish to rule us and that first paragraph gives a partial listing of the current ones albeit a few are no long with us and I hope they are in hell now for what they did to our country the how they did it reflects on us for not seeing it and believing their tall tales of what they would do for us; even though we know there is no such thing as a free lunch.
Is it too late for us now? Maybe but all is not lost and it may yet be possible to stop the takeover of the local governments by the wannabe rulers in Washington DC. Wake up American and reject ANY Federal money at the local or state level. It all come with strings and on the end of that string is the collar of a slave. Do you really want to wear it?
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
De Oppresso Liber
A group of Americans united by our commitment to Freedom, Constitutional Governance, and Civic Duty.
Share the truth at whatever cost.
De Oppresso Liber
Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine
De Oppresso Liber
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Australia's Front Line | Since 2011
See what War is like and how it affects our Warriors
Nwo News, End Time, Deep State, World News, No Fake News
De Oppresso Liber
Politics | Talk | Opinion - Contact Info: stellasplace@wowway.com
Exposition and Encouragement
The Physician Wellness Movement and Illegitimate Authority: The Need for Revolt and Reconstruction
Real Estate Lending
Centinel2012 