White House Hid Huge Spike Of Families Crossing Border


Re-Post from the Daily Caller by Neil Munro, White House Correspondent

Photo of Neil Munro

New data shows the White House has painted a false picture of the Central American migration by hiding a huge spike in “family units” who are illegally crossing the Texas border.

The data, which was dumped by the U.S. border patrol late Friday afternoon, shows that inflow of youths and children traveling without parents has doubled since 2013, to 57,525 in the nine months up to July 2014.

But the number of migrants who cross the border in so-called “family units” has spiked five-fold to 55,420, according to the border patrol’s data, which came out amid a storm of news about the shoot-down of a Malaysian aircraft in Ukraine, delays in failed U.S. nuke talks with Iran, and on Hamas’ continued war against Israel.

In the Rio Grande area where most of the migrants are crossing the border, the number of so-called “unaccompanied children” was actually outnumbered by the inflow by adults, parents and children in “family units,” according to the data.

The much-faster growth in “family units” has been hidden by White House and agency officials, who have tried to portray the influx as a wave of children fleeing abuse and violence.

Top officials, such as Jeh Johnson, the secretary of Homeland Security, has explained the influx as a child migration, and justified the government’s welcoming response as acting “in the best interests of the children.” That portrayal has been picked up and spread by Democratic legislators, reporters and bloggers — such as Greg Sargent at The Washington Post and Rachel Lienesch at the Huffington Post – to help mute the public’s growing anger at the Democrats’ failure to guard the border.

However. that effort has largely failed. Most of the unaccompanied youths say they’re aged 14 to 17, and many are seeking jobs. Also, multiple polls shows the majority of Americans — and near-majorities of Latin-Americans — blame Obama for the breakdown. A July Gallup poll shows that the crisis has prompted Americans to identify it as the nation’s leading problem.

White House officials also touted the wave of so-called “unaccompanied children,” and downplayed the “family units,” because they wished to focus the media’s attention on a supposed problem caused by a 2008 law, titled the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act.

White House officials say the law prevents them from repatriating Central Americans youths and children once they’re legally dubbed “unaccompanied alien children.” Officials also say the 2008 law forces them to settle the youths in the United States until judges decide if they can stay in the country.

The 2008 law was designed to allow severely-traumatized victims of forced trafficking — such as teenage prostitutes held by violent pimps — to apply for green cards in the United States.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/18/white-house-hid-huge-spike-of-families-crossing-border/#ixzz387GkDmFe

THE UNITED STATES OF PROPAGANDA


Sadly this is all true and it is our fault for we elected every one of these criminals to public office. We allowed the schools to dumb us down not believing that they would turn on us like they did. This is going to be very hard to reverse but the Citizens have done it before!

happeninghobbit's avatarGrassroots Contemplations

Spy vs SpyNone of what is happening to America is happening by direction of one person. All are involved in this massive hoax on the people. For most of us our awakening was the introduction of an unknown Senator from Chicago that, for reasons that were yet unknown to us, was nominated to the highest office in the land. Not once but twice, and through both elections ballot integrity was riddled with questions.  But, the fix was in, the final assault on our sovereignty had begun in earnest and neither Party even bothered to pretend to glance at the evidence. We have been infiltrated, we are under assault now by our own Government.

It is crystal clear that the current President is not the real leader of this country. It’s crystal clear that playing basketball and golf is not what the leader of the free world indulges in ad nauseum.  It’s evident…

View original post 1,171 more words

REID AND OBAMA ARE DESTROYING THE DREAM KIDS: CRUZ SAYS FOLLOW THE LAW


Obama, Reid and Pelosi are the worst kind of politicians thinking only of themselves and how much power and money they can accumulate no matter how many have to suffer for their greed!

burstupdates's avatarBurst Updates

View original post

GOV PERRY BECOMES AMERICA’S LEADER AND SENDS TROOPS TO THE BORDER: WILL OBAMA GO NOW?


Well a leader emerges — now will Obama go along with this action or will he try to stop Perry?

burstupdates's avatarBurst Updates

View original post

We have been Invaded?


Has Mexico started a War with us by invading the United States?

An invasion is a military offensive in which large parts of combatants of one geopolitical entity aggressively enter territory controlled by another such entity, generally with the objective of either conquering, liberating or re-establishing control or authority over a territory, forcing the partition of a country, altering the established government or gaining concessions from said government, or a combination thereof. An invasion can be the cause of a war, be a part of a larger strategy to end a war, or it can constitute an entire war in itself. Due to the large scale of the operations associated with invasions, they are usually strategic in planning and execution.

War is an organized and often prolonged conflict that is carried out by states or non-state actors. It is generally characterized by extreme violence, social disruption and economic destruction. War should be understood as an actual, intentional and widespread armed conflict between political communities, and therefore is defined as a form of political violence or intervention. The set of techniques used by a group to carry out war is known as warfare. An absence of war is usually called peace.

The Ultimate cause (or distal cause) is usually thought of as the “real” reason something occurred. This is in contrast to a proximate cause which is an event which is closest to, or immediately responsible for causing, some observed result. It is sometimes hard to make the distinction but without doing so direct actions for change and be disastrous.

Soon after 2008 election the geopolitical beliefs of the new Obama administration began a “Fundamental” change in the way our Federal government interacted in the world. The F***ing change was based on the teachings of the likes of Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, Paul Krugman and George Soros, to name only a few. The core of this mixed bag of convoluted beliefs was that America was Ultimate cause of World unrest, Only an enlighten elite could properly rule the world and social and economic justice were more important than legal justice.

The unintended consequences of these administrations fundamental changes have manifested themselves in three areas, so far, but more is yet to come. The first is the destabilization of the Middle East and Africa which was given the name the Arab Spring. The second was the policy changes that de facto created an “open border” into Mexico and Central America. The third area has not reared its ugly head yet but that is the symbiotic relationship with China.

In this posting we are discussing the second change which is a de facto open border between Mexico and the US South West. Starting with Fast n Furious and now ending with the end of the border by allowing Mexico to give central Americans free access to the US and that being Condoned by Nance Pelosi with her statement, “we are all Americans” — we have been “invaded” and the MH-17 as sad as it is, is a distraction from the real issue facing us now — the invasion!

The real American people, meaning legal Citizens, never wanted this F***ing Change so what we have is a gaggle of progressive politicians that have committed perjury which is an impeachable offense when they stopped supporting their primary duty of protecting the US Constitution from enemies both Foreign and Domestic they lost their right to govern. Obama, Holder, Reid and Pelosi are the worst of the lot and what they have started will be very hard to undo; especially with the southern border which bring us to the purpose of this post.

Realizing that no world leader sees anything but an empty suit with the current occupant of the White House, it’s not much of a surprise that the Mexicans have invaded the United States. They have done so with the cartels and pushing their citizens and those of other Central American counties north into California, Arizona New Mexico and Texas. Of course it helps to have the support for this invasion reside in the political leadership of this country. But that doesn’t take away the fact that this is an invasion and that means that it is a de facto declaration of war on the citizens of this country by the participants in this invasions of which Mexico is the leader for they could stop this if they wanted too.

No country can maintain its sovereignty when it is being invaded; and if this is not stopped then the United States will be gone in a few years; if for no other reason than the states that are being invaded will need to do something to protect themselves from this invasion. It almost seems that the progressives’ what the states to do something so they can move in the regular army to stop the states from stopping the invasion — now doesn’t that mean these above listed Politicians should be impeached!

BRICS Plan To Become “Political Alliance” To Reform The International Financial System


This is a major nail, more a spike, in the ‘coffin’ that is the US reserve currency system run my the IMF and the World Bank.

As Falls America, So Falls The Rest Of The World


Obama is fundamentally changing not only America but the entire world; sadly its not going to be better, but much worse!

FEDS ASK MASSACHUSETTS TO HOUSE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AT UNUSED SHOPPING MALLS


Obama plays golf while the world goes up in flames!

Convert, pay or die: Iraqi Christians flee Mosul after Islamic State ultimatum


Obama if you are a “real” Christian, and not a Muslim as many claim, then you will do something about this — not go on fund raising jaunts and then take a long vacation! My God man there are thousands of civilians being tormented abused and killed — do something!

Using the Tenth Amendment, Nulification


Nullification Strategy vs Failed Calls for Federal Agent Arrests

Re-Post from the tenth amendment center by Mike Maharrey July 18, 2014

A few weeks ago, I wrote an article arguing that provisions in nullification bills directing state and local law enforcement officers to arrested federal agents for violations of the Constitution represent a “poison pill.”

 

But as much as we might like to see our friendly neighborhood ATF agent sitting in the back of a squad car with his hands wrenched behind his back, including criminal penalties on federal agents in nullification bills amounts to a legislative poison pill.

And they will never have any practical effect in today’s legal system.

An e-mailer took issue with my position and argued that, at least in Missouri, bills with arrest provisions could have a practical effect because voters can hold state judges accountable to voters through a removal process.

Yes, the attorney for the ATF officer will make a motion to move the case to Federal court, but the state judge is not required to grant the motion. Here in Missouri our judges face a retention election every few years. A judge who granted the motion would find that there was a campaign to remove him from office the next time he was on the ballot. The word “may” is permissive.

In the meantime, though, an ATF agent will find his name all over the news, and probably pictures of him in handcuffs. Will that deter other ATF agents from enforcing the unconstitutional laws, or will it make them want revenge? Who knows. Either way, though, the discussion will be quite public, and that is a good thing.

To some degree, the e-mailer’s strategy mirrors the thinking of some abolitionists during the fugitive slave era. They advocated for the arrest of federal marshals engaged in fugitive slave rendition on kidnapping charges. They conceded that the arrests would almost certainly not lead to a conviction, or even an attempt at prosecution. But they reasoned that even if quickly released, the repetitive arrest of federal marshals would gum up the works and create a hindrance to the capture and return of fugitives in and of itself.

So, the arrest of federal agents could have an impact in the way my critic envisions. It could potentially deter enforcement of a given unconstitutional federal act, and it would certainly spark vigorous public discussion.

But a problem remains. No state seems to possess the will to carry out such a program. Missouri failed twice to enact legislation protecting the Second Amendment that included penalties on federal agents. The first time, both houses of the legislature passed a bill, but they could not overcome the governor’s veto. Last legislative session, political pressure led to the removal of penalties, and the existence of penalties on state officials was a factor in the legislature’s failure to give the Second Amendment Preservation Act final approval.

My e-mailer fails to take into account that his argument hangs on the assumption that the legislature can get this type of measure passed. It assumes a great deal of political will that doesn’t seem to exist. As I wrote in the original article, “If you want to guarantee a bill dies a quick death, include penalties on federal agents. I’ve witnessed this time and time again over the last few years. A piece of legislation can feature nine really strong provisions that the majority of lawmakers in a legislature will get behind, and the bill will never see the light of day because of the penalties.”

Missouri went for the gusto and ultimately ended up with nothing – twice. Arrest provisions doom bills that would otherwise pass. So, despite any value you might find in legislation with arrest “teeth,” it becomes a liability when it guarantees failure. Passing a bill without teeth to lay the groundwork and then working toward stronger measures in future sessions constitutes and much more viable strategy.

One also has to consider the position arrest provisions directed at federal agents would place on state and local law enforcement officers tasked to carry out the policy. Since under 8 U.S. Code § 111, federal prosecutors can charge any person interfering with a federal officer, it becomes highly unlikely that local LEOs would risk their life and family to carry out the arrest. This fact compounds the problem of political will. Few lawmakers will stake out a position that places state and local law enforcement officers in harm’s way.

While passing bills with teeth does create some strategic possibilities, the idea still remains problematic because of  the lack of political will. Activists should instead focus energy on promoting anti-commandeering legislation that stands a chance of approval as a start. Then build on the success with more education leading to stronger actions down the road.