Presidential Candidate Donald Trump Interviewed on Fox News April, 2011


Bill O’Reilly Donald Trump FULL Interview
Full Interview: Donald Trump on ‘The O’Reilly Factor’ Apr. 01, 2011 – 34:12 – Unedited video of Bill’s interview with the real estate mogul

Obama Commits U.S. to 15-Year, Multi-Nation Effort to End Hunger and Poverty Worldwide


This is the prelude to the Climate Treaty That will be proposed at the end of the COP21 conference that will be held in Paris during November and December. The COP21 conference will propose a wold “Climate” Tax that Obama will then submitted to the UN for approval. There is no question that the UN will approve it as it is basically a tax on the US. This will mean a “Reduced” standard of living for all Americans.

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

President Barack Obama on Sunday committed the U.S. to a new blueprint to eliminate poverty and hunger around the world, telling a global summit that a sweeping new development agenda is “not charity but instead is one of the smartest investments we can make in our own future.”

President Barack Obama speaks at the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit, Sunday, Sept. 27, 2015, at the United Nations headquarters. The global meeting is focused on fixing some of the world's greatest problems through a 15-year road map. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) President Barack Obama speaks at the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit, Sunday, Sept. 27, 2015, at the United Nations headquarters. The global meeting is focused on fixing some of the world’s greatest problems through a 15-year road map. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

It was the first of two addresses Obama is making at the United Nations. His second on Monday morning, to the annual U.N. General Assembly of world leaders, will be a broader examination of world issues, especially the ever-more complicated conflict in Syria and the related refugee crisis.

As Secretary of State John Kerry put it after a meeting on the…

View original post 251 more words

Believing in Nonsense


Believing in Nonsense

Global Warming

QUESTION: How can you refute all the evidence that there is global warming and climate change caused by man?

ANSWER: First, you should not be reading this blog for you obviously believe in government propaganda no matter what the field that is put out by the academic community. Global Warming is on par with Marxism and how handing all power to government will prevent recessions.

Even in economics, I was told to be a good boy, put out studies with predetermined conclusions and I would make millions per year for every bill passed by government requires a bogus economic study. There are some academics who are independent free thinkers such as Milton Friedman. Those who are willing to buck government and who are not on the gravy train of government subsidies are the minority. The same is true with this nonsense that man is entirely behind climate change and there is nothing that is a natural cyclical force such as the energy output of the sun is not even considered. If you just accept global warming/climate change is entirely caused by man, please stop reading this blog for you will also believe whatever government tells you with their equally bogus economic statistics so you are not going to make it to the other side.

The entire theory of man caused climate change is nonsense as if this is something created since the 1920s with absolutely no study whatsoever of the cyclical nature of the climate pre-1920. These bogus corrupt “scientists” (using the word very loosely since they sell out to the highest bidder) do not demonstrate ANYTHING historically, yet you try to put the burden on me to prove a bogus theory is wrong. You begin with accepting whatever they say is true and then demand I prove a negative is negative. These bought and paid for “scientists” have provided no documented study for thousands of years and they keep manipulating the data to try to pretend they are right when ALL independent research demonstrates they are dead wrong. The North Pole moves yet their stations are fixed and declare it is getting warming because the pole moved further away. The North Pole is moving to Russia. There is even evidence that the poles flip on Earth as they do on the sun. Where the sun poles flip north to south about every 11 years, on when Earth the poles flip are measure in hundreds of thousands of years but we are overdue.

These really corrupt scientists’ entire theory of greenhouse gases has been based upon assuming temperature throughout the troposphere would be constant but for human activity. If they were financial analysts they would conclude after a 3 year bull market that stock only go up or like the gold promoters who claim every rally is real and declines are manipulations for they can see only one side. These corrupt pretend scientists assume that carbon dioxide and methane raise the surface temperature of the planet because they assume that temperature would be the same at all levels in the troposphere if there were no greenhouse gases. Of course they have no data to ever prove that such a perfect state of equal temperatures ever existed. They are so off the planet demonstrating that they completely fail to comprehend how a dynamic system works.

So sorry. The burden is yours, not mine. Show me a study that proves these theories for thousands of years. Then and only then is it even worth discussing.

These people flew a plane over the South Pole and said OMG, there is a hole in the Ozone so we must have caused it! They are clueless to demonstrate that there was never a hole before. It is just amazing. They have put forth NOTHING to prove their theory before 1900 and attribute everything to human activity. Sure we do not want to be in a city that you cannot breath. London use to be that way in the 1980s. It has been cleaned up and buses where the main culprit.

Now that cars are more efficient and electric cars are starting to take over, states are looking to switch to taxing people per mile they drive because revenue has declined from gasoline. Even government realize the peak in fossil fuel is past us and this also contributes to why oil has entered a new phase. All the data from satellites proves that temperatures have been declining for almost the past two decades. But academics get checks from government for studies. The last economist who told a government they were wrong after taking the head job to draft the business plan was Kondratieff. If you do not put out studies that say what government wants to hear, you do not get paid. That is the simple fact. It is the same in every field.

The GOPe Roadmap, Status Update and The Event Horizon…


Good work on the R’s I would present a different outcome on the D’s. In Paris in December the COP21 climate conference will end with a proposed recommendation to be presented to the UN on a major carbon tax on the EU and the US/Canada (Western Civilization) in early 2016. This is to be the Crown Jewel of BHO’s words transformation and to get it through the US process the only one capable of doing that is Al Gore. All other D’s candidates will be eliminated and the ticket will be Gore and Warren.

Mark Levin and Sean Hannity Discusses Jorge Ramos, Illegal Alien Activism, Donald Trump and Jeb Bush


Scotland’s last coal-fired power station to close in March


A very big mistake and soon to be followed here as we close down coal and drive thereby down its worth so George Soros can buy it all up and sell it to China.

oldbrew's avatarTallbloke's Talkshop

Bye-bye Longannet [image credit: BBC] Bye-bye Longannet [image credit: BBC]
It’s only a matter of time before increasing dependency on renewables proves to be a mistake. Details from the BBC: RIP Longannet power station.

Scotland’s last coal-fired power station, Longannet in Fife, is to close on 31 March next year.

Its owner, Scottish Power, said the high cost of connecting to the grid was to blame.

The company has also announced it is abandoning plans to build a new gas-fired power station at Cockenzie in East Lothian.

Longannet, which opened in 1972, is one of the biggest coal-fired power stations in Europe.

View original post 76 more words

Solar activity is declining—what to expect?


This pattern matches the model I developed in 2007 almost exactly.

oldbrew's avatarTallbloke's Talkshop

A bit less of this to look forward to? [image credit: traveldailynews.com] A bit less of this to look forward to? [image credit: traveldailynews.com]
Some solar theories will be put to the test in the next few decades by the Sun’s ongoing behaviour patterns.

Is Earth slowly heading for a new ice age? Looking at the decreasing number of sunspots, it may seem that we are entering a nearly spotless solar cycle which could result in lower temperatures for decades. “The solar cycle is starting to decline. Now we have less active regions visible on the sun’s disk,” Yaireska M. Collado-Vega, a space weather forecaster at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, told Phys.org.

But does it really mean a colder climate for our planet in the near future? In 1645, the so-called Maunder Minimum period started, when there were almost no sunspots. It lasted for 70 years and coincided with the well-known “Little Ice Age”, when Europe and North America experienced lower-than-average…

View original post 552 more words

Halfway to Hell? – Alarmists are Growing Desperate in Their Efforts to Influence Public Opinion


If you look back 2,000 years there is a very clear pattern of warm and cold periods alternating every ~500 years. The last cold period ended around 1650 so assuming that pattern is still in play it will be warming until 2150 however since this is a continuous or wave effect we have already passed the point of rapid increases and are now is a period of slow increases. This pattern accounts for most of the observed recent increased in global temperatures.

Bob Tisdale's avatarBob Tisdale - Climate Observations

INTRODUCTION

Apparently, based initially on a 1975 “first intuition” by an economist (not a climate scientist), politicians have sought to limit global surface warming to 2 deg C above pre-industrial levels by restricting greenhouse gas emissions. To that end, those politicians created the political entity called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), whose sole purpose is to prepare reports to support the politicians’ agendas.

Politicians from around the globe are once again gathering this year to futilely try to reach agreement on how to achieve that goal of limiting global warming to the economist-suggested limit. So, in order to increase public awareness, we’re being bombarded weekly with speculations of pending global-warming gloom and doom. One was a recent article Earth now halfway to UN global warming limit at NewScientist. It included a graph titled “Halfway to hell”, my Figure 1, prepared by chemist Kevin Cowtan. The graph showed that the values of…

View original post 1,114 more words

Ocean Heat: New Study Shows Climate Scientists Can Still Torture Data until the Data Confess


These minions of the progressive movement have forfeited any and all of degrees they were given as they have violated every principle of science. Worse the are creating propaganda just like those the did the bidding of Hitler in the 1930’s. I see no difference between either group other than the language they they spoke.

Bob Tisdale's avatarBob Tisdale - Climate Observations

A week or so ago, a troll left a link at my blog to a supposed-to-be-alarming blog post about a new climate study of ocean heat content. According to the study, a revised method of tweaking ocean heat reconstructions has manufactured new warming so that the top 700 meters of the oceans are warming faster than predicted by climate models. In other words, the “missing heat” is missing no more.

View original post 1,542 more words

Biggest Fraud In Science History – The NASA/NOAA Surface Temperature Record


What we need to do is stop calling the workers at NASA and NOAA scientists and give them their more accurate title of Wizards for what they do has nothing to do with science!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Over the last ten years, satellites show that the Earth is cooling. But that doesn’t suit the needs of the climate criminal community ahead of their convention in Paris this year, so NASA/NOAA created a completely fake surface temperature record – which is diverging from satellite temperatures at a rate of two degrees per century

ScreenHunter_243 Jul. 24 19.38

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

There isn’t one smidgen of legitimacy to the NASA/NOAA temperature record, but current their job is to create propaganda for the White House.

This fraud is nothing new for them, as they have been altering their own data for decades to create the impression of imaginary global warming. They have doubled 1880-1980 warming since Hansen 1981.

giss-1981-2002-2014-global

And their fraudulent temperature record looks nothing like the 1975 National Academy of Sciences graph.

screenhunter_9457-may-24-06-49

They are able to get away with this, because they have many criminals in government and the press backing them…

View original post 44 more words