Multiculturalism and “Anti-Semitism”: Thoughts Out of Season


By Paul Eidelberg

Savvy people know that multiculturalism is simply a fancy term for cultural relativism, which denies the existence of ideas and values that transcend space and time. Relativism holds that the validity of moral and philosophical ideas is limited to the cultural horizon in which they originate. But what has this to with “anti-Semitism”?

Anti-Semitism is a misnomer for Jew-hatred and Judaism, or “Judeophobia”. What does this really mean? Judeophobia is hatred of Israel. What underlies this hatred?

Judaism posits the idea that such is the plenitude of God that He creates, in addition to a vast number of unique individuals, many diverse of nations to reveal His infinite wisdom, power, and graciousness in every domain of existence. But to disseminate that knowledge, God has created a special nation for this purpose, Israel. This nation embodies two sets of laws. One set is intended for Jews. A subset of these laws, the Seven Laws of Noah (or the seven law of universal morality) is intended for all mankind. (I have elaborated on this subject in my book Toward a Renaissance of Israel and America: The Political Theology of Rabbi Eliyahu Benamozegh.)

Bearing the preceding in mind, Judaism provides an intellectual foundation for both monoculturalism and multiculturalism. It follows that anti-Semitism, understood as hatred of Jews and Judaism, has two dimensions. On the one hand, it rejects the monocultural aspect of Judaism – which is to reject the existence of Israel as a sovereign nation-state. On the other hand, it rejects the multicultural aspect of Judaism implicit in the Seven Noah Laws which apply to humanity as a whole.

What has replaced the Seven Noah Laws which apply to humanity as a whole is the academic doctrine of multicultural moral relativism. This doctrine rejects the existence of any universal laws of morality, hence of any trans-cultural or trans-historical standards of right and wrong, good and bad, justice and injustice.

From these thoughts out of season it follows that what is universally and egregiously called “anti-Semitism” should be replaced by the reality it obscures, namely, hatred of Jews and Judaism.

At the same time, what is called “multiculturalism” should be understood as a hidden form of hatred of Judaism if only because multiculturalism implies a rejection of the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality.

By linking multiculturalism (now prevalent in America and Europe) with anti-Semitism redefined as hatred of Jews and Judaism, we can better understand the decay and decline of Western Civilization. Moreover, understanding multiculturalism as an indirect form of Jew-hatred – i.e., of Judaism’s universal laws of morality – conveys a deeper understanding of Islam’s fanatical hatred of Judaism and the West.

Islam, contrary to the Bible of Israel, rejects the concept of the nation state, hence the Bible’s liberal and human affirmation of diverse nations or cultures. But this Islamic rejection of the Bible’s positive affirmation of diverse nation-states is in fact a diminution or rejection the plenitude of God.

Moreover, Islam’s diminutive conception of God’s creativity is related to the Hebraic conception of man’s creation in the image of God. This Hebraic conception logically and ontologically entails an infinite Being who creates the vast multiplicity of unique individuals required to “relate His praise,” as stated in Isaiah (43:21): “This people I fashioned for Myself that they might relate my praise,” meaning God’s infinite wisdom, power, and graciousness in every domain of existence. This plenitude of God, which reconciles permanence and change (which is manifested in the Written and Oral Torah), requires diverse nation-states and an enormous variety of human beings to sanctify God’s Name.

An American Renaissance


by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD January 31, 2015

obama evil

The Obama years will be forever known as the Dark Ages of US history, a time of political, cultural and economic deterioration. We have yet to see if they will lead to the fall of the American republic.

In the Obama years, the lie became not only a campaign strategy or a means to enact damaging policies, but an institution of government; the Presidency itself, a lie of monstrous proportions guarded by the complicit and the willingly ignorant.

In the Obama years, the Congress finally clearly demonstrated that although we have elections, there is no longer a government representing its citizens, but an entity serving itself, operating outside of Constitutional constraints and unaccountable to the American people for the benefit of the few at the expense of the many.

In the Obama years, disseminating either disinformation or no information, a devoted media helped create the intellectual darkness and vacant servitude required to carry out the strategy of their leftist Messiah;  a country without any sense of its own history and traditions, where the low-information voter would slouch towards Obama’s imaginary utopia through a combination of governmental coercion and the hedonist nihilism of a painless, amusement-sodden, and stress-free America managed by a nanny-state.

In the Obama years, we see the resurrection of the economic feudalism of the Dark Ages, a system dominated by wealthy special interests that inhibit the upward mobility of the poor and the middle class.

In the Obama years, like during the Dark Ages, we witness the rise of Islamic hegemony and violence, the infiltration of the US government by the Muslim Brotherhood and the promotion of Sharia law in our schools and judicial system.

Renaissance literally means rebirth, a celebration of the human spirit and mankind’s potential for growth; a return to the ideals upon which the United States was founded, that is, a Constitution based on the Judeo-Christian values of Western civilization. Concomitantly, we should remember the sacrifices endured by our forebearers and reaffirm our commitment to preserve our way life as Joseph Story wrote in his 1833 Commentaries on the Constitution:

“Let the American youth never forget, that they possess a noble inheritance, bought by the toils, and sufferings, and blood of their ancestors; and capacity, if wisely improved, and faithfully guarded, of transmitting to their latest posterity all the substantial blessings of life, the peaceful enjoyment of liberty, property, religion, and independence.”

The framework of an American Renaissance is a restoration of the Constitution, in particular, 10th Amendment, which states:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

It is clear that members of Congress have largely not adhered to their oath to support and defend the Constitution. The solution, however, is not simply trying to elect more “good” people, who eventually get coopted or crushed by the system, but to create circumstances or incentives that oblige bad people to do the right thing.

The starting point should be limiting Congressional terms to a total of 12 years either in the House of Representatives or in the Senate or a combination thereof and abolishing all special benefits for members of Congress and government officials beyond those available to ordinary citizens.

Free enterprise is the most efficient system for the production of goods and services ever devised. Government is not. Federal taxation and regulations must be reduced to an absolute minimum to unleash the creative forces of the free market to power economic growth and increase jobs.

To increase growth and employment, it is essential to reduce the size of government by enacting, with the exception of defense, a yearly across-the-board 5% reduction in federal funding with the immediate elimination of the Departments of Homeland Security, Energy, Education and the Environmental Protection Agency.

The establishment of a simplified flat tax system for individuals and businesses would obviate the need for the Internal Revenue Service, removing its use as a political weapon and severely limiting the corrupting influence of lobbyists.

Other measures include: securing our borders and firm enforcement of current immigration laws; strictly applying Equal Opportunity against the discriminatory practices of affirmative action and diversity policies; declaring Sharia incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and making its public implementation in any form illegal; declaring English the one and only official language of the United States; rejecting political correctness and multiculturalism as an infringement of the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment and contrary to the American principle of E pluribus Unum.

An American Renaissance cannot be achieved, however, if we do not, as a country, speak the truth and recognize how far we have strayed from the Constitution, representative government and fiscal sanity.

Succinctly, we have a hopelessly corrupt political-media culture, which made possible a fraudulent and destructive Obama Administration.

Barack Obama came to office inexperienced, but armed with a dangerously subversive anti-American agenda designed to undermine the Constitution and the uniqueness and sacredness of the individual, where, through the exercise of his or her reason, one can discern the means necessary to secure life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, unmediated by mullahs or government bureaucrats.

Unless we undertake a thorough exposition of who Obama really is, what is his background and true agenda, what forces made his unprecedented rise to power possible and who has conspired to hide the truth, an American Renaissance will not be forthcoming.

We are in a new Dark Age. In such situations, the record of history is unequivocal; either we produce a Renaissance, that is, a rebirth of the fundamental principles upon which America was founded or our republic dies.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of “Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution “. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

Read more: Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/an-american-renaissance?f=must_reads#ixzz3QX6jWr5P
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

Invoking God in Statesmanship


Prof. Paul Eidelberg

One of the most important ingredients of statesmanship is to foster national unity.  A prerequisite of national unity is the citizen’s belief that he and his fellow-citizens share supreme values. How did George Washington address this issue? Let’s consider a few words of his famous “Farewell Address,” America’s most important state paper.

He first reinforced belief in the value of national unity by appealing to the three motivating factors of human nature: sentiment, interests, and ideas. Accordingly, he points out that “With slight shades of difference, you have the same Religion, Manners, Habits and political Principles.” Religion is mentioned first.

Alexis de Tocqueville, the renowned author of Democracy in America, writes: “Religion in America takes no direct part in the government of society, but it must be regarded as the first of their political institutions; for if it does not impart a taste for freedom, it facilitates the use of it.” Americans, he said, combine the notions of religion and freedom so intimately in their minds that it is impossible to make them conceive the one without the other.” Hence, with the exception of Barack Obama, American presidents often invoke the name of God. In fact, the American Presidency Project website lists the whopping number of 10,984 presidential references to God, with only 267 to Jesus.

Unlike Israeli prime ministers, Arab leaders, in their ambition to gain control of the Land of Israel, frequently invoke the name of God—in their case, “Allah.” Even if they have murder in their hearts, their appeal to God (or “Allah”) sanctifies His name and thereby furthers the Arab cause vis-à-vis Israel whose leaders are unabashed secularists. Perhaps I am mistaken—and if so I apologize in advance—but Mr. Netanyahu rarely if ever invokes the name of God in a public address.

This goes to the heart of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. It underlies the failure of critics of the “peace process” to have any discernible effect on Israel’s government-sponsored territorial and spiritual shrinkage which began even before the 1993 Oslo or Israel-PLO Agreement.

No one can deny that the Arabs have made enormous gains since Anwar Sadat’s historic visit to Jerusalem in November 1977. Recall his speech in the Knesset, a speech broadcast to countless millions of people around the world.  In the first ten sentences of that speech Sadat intoned the name of God ten times!

Wonder of wonders, without firing a shot, Egypt recovered the Sinai with its Alma oil fields and sophisticated air bases—a $17 billion infrastructure developed by Jews. All this Egypt obtained in exchange for what Sadat scornfully called “a piece of paper.”

And when Yasser Arafat, exiled in Tunis, triumphantly marched into Gaza as a result of the Oslo Agreement and there spoke of the ultimate aims of the “Palestinians,” he, too, invoked he name of God on behalf of the Arab cause.  Behold the result:  The Arabs now control Gaza and PM Netanyahu has virtually yielded Judea and Samaria by endorsing a Palestinian state!

Turn, now, to the late King Hussein of Jordan.  Again and again Hussein intoned the name of God while calling for “peace and justice,” whether he was speaking from Amman or from Washington.  And lo and behold, in October 1994 he signed a peace treaty with Israel, in which treaty the godless government of Yitzhak Rabin rewarded Hussein with 330 square kilometers of Jewish land!

Arabs, inspired by “Allah” and confident in the justice of their cause, advance; Jews longing for peace and silent about God only retreat. Let us try to understand the Arab advance and the Jewish retreat in psychological terms.

Because Jews clamor only for peace, they make no serious demands on Arabs. Indeed, Israeli governments are ever making unilateral concessions. This can only arouse Arab contempt and encourage them to make more demands, however outrageous. But the Arabs are predisposed to make demands if only because they demand “peace and justice.”

Now justice involves a relation between persons and things.  In the present context, the persons are Arabs and Jews, while the things consist of land. Arab leaders vow they will not be satisfied until they possess all the Land of Israel. Contrast the Jews, satisfied with a mere strip of this land. The asymmetry is striking and ominous.

The Arab’s maximalist attitude, paraded in terms of justice, precludes justice.  So does the Jewish attitude, which is silent about justice. The Jews are also silent about Divine Justice, according to which the entire Land of Israel belongs to the Jewish People. The Jews want only peace, for which they are willing to give Arabs land. But peace, unlike land, is not a tangible thing. Justice in these terms is not possible. Only Divine Justice is possible, but this exalted idea does not animate Israel’s godless leaders.

Nevertheless, godless Jews have been desperately seeking a common ground with their Allah-inspired Arab enemies. The Jews would like to believe that Arabs, like themselves, fear violent death, hence war.  But Arab suicide-bombers tell a different story: they believe in paradise. Godless Jews do not—another asymmetry. As for religious Jews, they cling to life under the danger-to-life avoidance concept of “pekuach nefesh.”  So how can Jews, by yielding land, purchase peace from Arabs who love war and even death in the name of “Allah”?

But wait! God has given the Jews the best of enemies! This enemy exposes the artificial foundations of the present secular-Zionist State of Israel! Day after day the Jews of Israeli are being degraded by the insincerity, deviousness, and lack of moral courage exhibited by their prime ministers. We behold such leaders with increasing disgust – their lack of wholehearted dedication to that which alone justifies Israel’s existence: the God of Israel, the Torah of Israel, and the Land of Israel.

Sooner or later, Israel will vomit out these play actors who pretend to speak and act for the People of the Book.  Sooner or later, this People will rise up and restore God’s Holy Name in the domain of statecraft.

Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement – War Is War – Chris Kyle Is True American Hero!


Obama and Jess Venture are nothing but clowns — men and women like Chis Kyle are the real American’s that made America.

Image

INEPTOCRACY


screen-shot-2015-01-30-at-4-44-26-pm

Is the Taliban a Terrorist Group?


The redefinition of terror is needed so that the provisions in sections 1031 and 1032 of the US National defense authorization Act (NDAA) can be used in the United States without confusing those designated as Terrorists in the US with armed insurgents out side the US. The politicians are very concerned about the Tea party since that last time we had one we had a war with England over taxes so they would like them to be classed as terrorists so that section 1031 and 1032 could be applied to the Tea Party..

Pretzel Logic – White House Struggles To Reconcile Position of Taliban as “Not Terrorists”, While State Department Admits Taliban is “Terrorist Organization”…


Pretzel logic — translated by Obama into Pretzel diplomacy, Kinetic Pretzels, and maybe Climate Pretzels … lol .

Afterburner with Bill Whittle: Three and a Half Days


This is one of Whittle’s best, its from a few years ago 2011! The Occupy Wall Street protesters are complaining about everything from corporations to having to repay student loans. Is America the victim of its own success? Have we created a generation of self-entitled cry babies? Is it time to make these people spend three and half days in the woods so that they can appreciate what capitalism has given them?

Cuba Delivers Demands To White House – Return GITMO, Remove Embargo and Pay Us For The Suffering The U.S. Created


Reparations for Cuba and none for the American blacks that were slaves. I bet that is also coming in the next two years.

Chinese yuan now top 5 major intl payment currency


This is not good for the United States as it will mean higher prices for imports probably later this year.