Marxist Hillary Clinton Hates the Nuclear Family – Admits Repopulation is Real


Posted originally on May 21, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Hillary Clinton infamously blamed women for failing to secure the presidency. Clinton felt entitled to the female vote, but more women voted for Donald Trump than for Hillary Clinton. Instead of acknowledging that women are permitted to hold independent ideas and beliefs, she continually bashes women at every opportunity for not aligning with her views.

“They left me because they just couldn’t take a risk on me, because as a woman, I’m supposed to be perfect. They were willing to take a risk on Trump, who had a long list of, let’s call them flaws, to illustrate his imperfection, because he was a man, and they could envision a man as president and commander in chief,” Clinton said of her 2016 election fail.

Hillary Climate Change

In fact, Rodham–or Clinton, as she prefers her married name– believes that Republican women are unfit to lead. “Well, first of all, don’t be a handmaiden to the patriarchy, which kind of eliminates every woman on the other side of the aisle, except for very few,” Clinton said when asked if she had advice for a potential future woman president. “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood has been a popular portrayal of the far left who believe that allowing individual states to vote for abortion, a motion that was implemented by the US Supreme Court and not the president, is akin to a dystopian society where women are silenced and forced to reproduce.

Clinton said that there are a few conservative women, notably those who have attacked Trump, such as Liz Cheney, who are the rare exception. She then perpetuated the lie that is the Project 2025:

“It’s all in there—the return to the nuclear family, the return to being a Christian nation, return to producing a lot of children, which is sort of odd since the people who produce a lot of children are immigrants.”

Take that all in. Hillary was horrified that voters would like America to return to its roots, believing it would be an absolute tragedy if women had the CHOICE whether to work or raise a family, unlike today, where the economy simply does not allow one income to comfortably support a household in most situations. Children should be placed in expensive child care, run by the state, and parents should continue focusing on churning out taxable wages, and allow the system to raise the next generation.

Government prtend to be family

Project 2025 has been debunked, but repopulation theory is alive and well. Hillary admits that immigrants here “legally and undocumented” produce “larger than normal—American standard—families.” The left in America and Europe are aggressively pushing mass migration not out of compassion, but out of desperation and control. When you destroy the economic incentive for families to grow through taxation, inflation, and debt—you kill natural reproduction. The West has done exactly that. Financial constraints are the number one reason that young adults are refraining from having children.

The left believes migrants will be engineered into dependency, relying on government welfare and therefore voting for the party that promises perpetual handouts. This is why lawmakers want to prohibit voter ID checks. It is why states are spending their funds on countless social programs for noncitizens. Traditional Western culture is conservative in nature. Replacing the population with people who do not adhere to the traditional Judeo-Christian ideology changes the dynamics of the population at large.

FriedrichEngels

The traditional nuclear family does not revere the government. Friedrich Engels (pictured above), a pioneer of Marxism, argued against the nuclear family. He believed that the nuclear family perpetuated capitalism, private property ownership, and familial wealth, calling families a “unit of consumption.” Engels believed in communal living, polygamy or group marriage, and the removal of any private property. He argued that this was a feminist concept, as women in that time period were dependent on their husbands rather than the government.

As he writes in “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”:

“The significant characteristic of monogamous marriage was its transformation of the nuclear family into the basic economic unit of society, within which a woman and her children became dependent upon an individual man. Arising in conjunction with exploitative class relations, this transformation resulted in the oppression of women that has persisted to the present day.”

Male Female Woman

Marxism believes that the patriarchy controls women and the state controls men. It believes we should hand over all power to government who will ensure we are all equal—in poverty, as history has shown time and time again. Traditional roles, and gender roles, threaten Marxist philosophy, which is why we have seen gender identity become a massive controversy in recent years, with the left promoting a genderless society.

Hillary Clinton and everyone on the far left has damned the nuclear family because they uphold Marxist beliefs rooted in centralized government power and control.

Hungary Departs from International Criminal Court


Posted originally on May 21, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

ICC International Criminal Court

The Hungarian Parliament voted to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC) in a move that has rattled the European Union. The move comes weeks after Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu, who the ICC wants, traveled to Hungary to visit Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

The court of last resort, the idea of a global court came about post-World War II following the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials. The concept gained support once again during the Cold War era amid the slaughter that occurred in Yugoslavia. The Rwanda genocide brought about ad hoc tribunals and led world leaders to seek a global authority to prosecute crimes against humanity, specifically, genocide. The Rome Statute officially established the ICC on July 1, 2002, and received 60 ratifications to officially establish the international court that is located in The Hague, Netherlands. This treaty was negotiated within the United Nations framework, and Article 2 of the Rome Statute requires the ICC to adhere to UN guidelines in the “Negotiated Relationship Agreement.” The UN maintains that the ICC is independent.

Thomas Lubanga Dylio of the Democratic Republic of Congo was the first leader convicted by the ICC for conscripting child soldiers. His 14-year prison sentence ended in 2020. The majority of those who have faced trial are from African nations and have received minimal, if any, international backlash from the West.

ICC Indict Putin

Recently, the ICC has been honing in on alleged crimes in Venezuela, Ukraine, Gaza, the Philippines, and elsewhere as its influence expands. Orban has argued that the ICC is “no longer an impartial court, a rule-of-law court, but rather a political court.” Controversy has arrived as of latterly with the ICC hunting down both Putin and Netanyahu.

“Hungary firmly rejects the use of international organisations – in particular criminal courts – as instruments of political influence,” the bill, submitted by Deputy Prime Minister Zsolt Semjen, said on parliament’s website. The measure to withdraw from the ICC passed in a 134-37 vote.

Hungary has learned a valuable lesson about surrendering sovereignty to a globalist entity where unelected officials create the rules. The ICC is no longer an impartial neutral entity but has been weaponized as a tool of the UN. The UN has failed to prevent virtually every major war since World War II—from Korea to Vietnam to Iraq to Ukraine. It talks endlessly, issues non-binding resolutions, and does nothing of substance except expand its bureaucracy and budget. The media is declaring Orban a traitor of the West, a puppet of Russia and Israel. The truth of the matter is that world leaders are becoming increasingly suspicious of globalist entities like the World Health Organization, UN, WEF, HRC, etc. because they see the clear goal of centralized control.

Prequel


Posted originally on CTH on May 20, 2025 | Sundance 

In order to understand where we are today, we must understand our journey by remembering its origin.

Context is needed in order to truly appreciate events soon upon us.  A Big Hat Tip to Daniel Bocic Martinez who provides one of the most succinct encapsulations of the Hillary Clinton -vs- Barack Obama dynamic.

“Hillary Clinton didn’t trust Barack Obama because he was supposed to have waited his turn.

When the Bill Clinton presidential team in 2000 burrowed into the DNC, and installed HRC into the NY Senate seat, through heavy influence in primary machine politics, the Clintons were the happiest Dems in the country when W squeaked by Gore, leaving them in full control of the DNC money laundering operation for the duration of the W years.

“8 years of Bill, then 8 years of Hill,” was all going according to plan, with Hollywood planting Hillary as President “Easter eggs” throughout media of the 1990’s.

The 2008 primary was the culmination of their plan started decades earlier.

Obama’s 2004 DNC Speech and his Jefferson-Jackson speech were to place him as the heir apparent, but their lock over the DNC (and the superdelegates) was fait accompli.

Even Obama running a near flawless campaign wouldn’t have been enough on its own.

The factors that pushed him over the top, and that were outside his control, were 1) Hillary ran an abysmal campaign, due in large part to her abysmal interpersonal skills and genuine dislike of most human beings; and 2) then patriarch of the Kennedy political dynasty, Ted (whose always loathed the Clintons), pounced on the chink in HRC’s inevitability armor highlighted by her loss in Iowa (where she was outhustled in all 99 counties), and literally embraced Obama in New Hampshire shortly before the primary voting, and crowned Obama as heir apparent of what remained of the political capital once described as Camelot.

The superdelegate tsunami was stopped in its tracks and the rest is history.

With an embittered Hillary not ready to abandon decades of planning and ride off into the sunset, she first hoped McCain would somehow best Obama and then moved to burrow into his administration to maintain some level of control/access to the DNC money laundering operation her crime family ruled over for the better part of two decades.

Obama knew she would be disloyal outside of the administration, even worse in the Senate, spending each moment plotting a 2012 primary challenge (same reason she could never have been VP, she would have poisoned him if given the slot).

So, he made the Faustian bargain that would one day destroy his legacy and place in History and made her the one offer he knew she could not refuse, Secretary of State.

Out of sight, out of mind. He always cared more about his domestic agenda than foreign policy, and if she’s too busy selling political indulgences around the world, she’d put off 2012 primary ambitions and keep her eye on 2016.

Obama’s only obligation was to ensure that he did his part and ensure that his VP choose not to stand for President in 2016, which Biden dutifully complied with. HRC’s remaining embeds at the DNC then did their part in the 2016 primary and ensured the “mistake” of 2008 (heavily contested primary and near-infinite debates) was rectified.

The DNC went on to implement the “pied piper” strategy boosting Donald Trump in the early GOP primary, while being caught completely off guard as previously unknown Vermont Senate gadfly rallied the near plurality of Democrat primary voters who found her character and lack of authenticity repellant.

As the frailty of her campaign become apparent to threats from both Trump on the right and Bernie on the left, Hillary’s embeds in the administration at FBI/DOJ put their insurance plan into effect.

The FBI opened investigations into both [political] threads. For Bernie, the investigation targeted his wife and allegations of fraud surrounding a real estate transaction at her non-profit. For Trump, it was Crossfire Hurricane.

Neither was Obama’s operation by design but nonetheless happened under his watch and with the enthusiastic support of then VP Biden.

Once Trump finishes putting Chapter 9 of Art of the Deal into practice, it will be Obama’s lasting legacy.”

SCOOP: Chinese Cardinal Reveals Pope Leo Has Made Several Trips To China, Liz Yore Reports


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 19, 2025, at 9:00 pm EST

Brian Kennedy: New Pope, Old Problem: Will Leo XIV Resist Tyranny?


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 19, 2025, at 9:00 pm EST

TEN YEAR BUDGET SCAM: Steve Bannon Calls For External Revenue To Come To Table


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 19, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

VINDICATED: Laura Loomer On Initial Report Of Biden Having Terminal Illness In July 2024


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 19, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

Rep. Harris: “If We Don’t Get Significant Spending Reductions This Bill Isn’t Going Anywhere.”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 19, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

“This Has To Be A Formal Inquiry.” Bannon Demands Biden Medical Records Be Released


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 19, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

Biden Told Us He Had Cancer in 2022


Posted originally on May 20, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

The Biden family announced that Joe Biden is fighting an aggressive form of prostate cancer. The medical community is questioning if this diagnosis was well-known long before the announcement. Yet, a clip from July 2022 is circulating in which Joe Biden directly says that he has cancer.

On July 20, 2022, Biden was speaking in Massachusetts about the dangers of fossil fuels, stating that his mother would need to use the windshield wipers to remove the oil slick from the car. “That’s why I – and so damn many other people I grew up with – have cancer,” the former president clearly stated.

The White House immediately issued a statement to say that Biden had a cancerous skin lesion removed years ago. The media downplayed his admission as a “gaffe,” as for four long years the public was told to believe that statements made by the president may not be accurate. We were told to accept that the President of the United States had a difficult time with public speaking, and the White House would confirm or deny the words that came out of his mouth.

White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor declared that Joe Biden was “fit for duty” during his last exam in February 2024, when the world was questioning his mental health. Dr. O’Connor claimed Joe Biden was a “healthy, active, robust 81-year-old male who remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency.” Arthritis and sleep apnea were his only cited medical issues. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is a simple test that has been around since the 1980s that monitors a protein produced in cancerous prostate cells. Estimates state that the survival rate is around 98% when detected early, and one would imagine that the President of the United States had access to the best medical doctors in the nation. Yet, they failed to perform this simple test, as indicated by public health records.

Now, the Biden family had close personal ties to Dr. O’Connor. Joe’s sister-in-law, Sara Biden, described Dr. O’Connor as a “friend.” “Colonel O’Connor was actually a friend and he — we would frequently ask for his recommendations if any of us had a medical issue,” Sara Biden said in 2019 during a deposition from a malpractice case filed by her stepdaughter against a specialist referred to her by O’Connor. Dr. O’Connor invited Hunter, Jim, and a dozen other Bidens to his military retirement party in July 2017.

In mid-2017, Joe’s brother Jim attempted to secure Veterans Affairs contracts with the hospital chain, Americore. He utilized the help of Dr. O’Connor who arranged a meeting between Jim and the hospital’s president. “You and your team clearly share our vision,” O’Connor wrote to the hospital president following the business meeting. Dr. O’Connor had been a personal friend and mentor for the Biden family for years before officially taking on the White House physician role in 2021.

“Sad and unfortunate and I wish the former President the best in his treatment of this cancer,” Congressman Ronny Jackson (R-Texas), who previously served as the White House physician, wrote on X. “Care at the White House should be second to none. Unbelievable this was missed, but the truth is, his physician was more concerned about assisting with the political cover up than providing world class medical care.”

Ironically, Biden fired former White House physician Dr. Sean Conley to install Dr. Kevin O’Connor. It is not unusual for a president to hire a personal physician. However, Dr. Conley faced intense media scrutiny for allegedly sugar-coating then-President Trump’s coronavirus diagnosis. Dr. Conley later admitted he “was trying to reflect the upbeat attitude,” but in the end, Donald Trump was fine. Rear Admiral Dr. Ronny Jackson faced similar criticism for giving President Trump an optimistic medical review. As ABC News reported when Dr. O’Connor was appointed, “A source close to the president said Biden would never ask O’Connor to lie for him, and O’Connor would never offer. The two wouldn’t want to disappoint each other,” the source added.

Urologist Dr. David Shusterman stated that it is extremely unlikely for someone to develop aggressive prostate cancer when receiving annual checkups suddenly. “Most likely had it for a long time […] Aggressive prostate cancer grows over a long period of time. Five to ten years [in] the most aggressive form,” Dr. Shusterman said“He is a former president, had intensive state of the art care […] It’s unusual to hear that someone has prostate cancer when they’re annually being followed up. The fact that we find it at a Gleason 9 is unheard of.”

Dr. Chris George, medical director of the cancer program for the Northwestern Health Network, told Reuters that it is safe to assume that the president was receiving annual PSA checks. “What concerns me … is the fact that the cancer has been reported to have already spread beyond the prostate to the bones. And when the cancer has spread to the bones, that makes it stage 4, that means that the cancer is not curable,” George said. “There’s no treatment available that can cure the cancer. There’s definitely treatment available that can control the cancer.”

Dr. Shusterman said that even among the medically neglected population, it would be almost unheard of for someone to have such a sudden and severe diagnosis. He believes that even the most aggressive form of this cancer could take nine to 10 years to develop. The truth of the matter is that the Democrats likely knew Biden was physically and cognitively unable to serve. The man in charge of assessing Biden’s health was a personal family friend with ties spanning back to 2009. Are we to believe that the former President of the United States was a victim of medical malpractice?