Trade v Banking – The Real Issue


world-globe
While CNN and ABC news have turned really vicious against Trump, they are failing to report the real impact of world events that can undo everything. As we head into April/May, we are looking at a real crisis emerging that is beyond contemplation. The prospect of the breakup of the European Union because Brussels refuses to consider that their dream of ruling all of Europe is coming to an end. Yes, Juncker has said he will stand down while Draghi tries to threaten member states, saying they have to pay up in order to leave.

Last September, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned at the G20 summit in Hangzhou, China, that in the face of crises, the refusal to reform how things are functioning will lead to economic weakness in the global economy. “The latest data shows subdued activity, less growth in trade, and a very low inflation, suggesting an even weaker global economic growth this year,” the IMF told G20 leaders.

The real crisis behind the curtain remains not TRADE, but BANKING. The EU hired over 20,000 people to regulate the European banking system. They have been installing bail-ins after that worked in Cyprus. They have been moving toward instant banking transfers by September 2017 with the design of eliminating cash. All of this becomes a major risk and the European Central Bank holds 40% of all government debt in the Eurozone. The cracks in the foundation of the EU are tremendous and the ramifications will ripple through the entire global economy. The seriousness of this crisis is being ignored by mainstream media because they are too busy trying to undermine Trump because their own ratings have collapsed. Newspapers are for the 50+ generation. The youth go to the internet and really do not watch the news of mainstream media. They are rapidly becoming sidelined and they hate Trump’s tweets because he is going directly to the people much as FDR did with his fireside chats.

Norway Central Banker Warns Of Massive 50% Drop In Wealth Fund Assets To Cover Budget Deficits


Tyler Durden's picture

Back in August, we noted that, for the first time since it’s creation in 1996, the Norwegian government had started raiding its sovereign wealth fund in 2016 to cover government deficits.  Then in October the Nordic country revealed plans to massively increase withdrawals by over 25% in 2017, to $15 billion, to cover a budget hole that was expected to be roughly 8% of GDP.

That said, Norway’s ultimate GDP potential, and therefore budget deficits, are heavily dependent on oil prices so any further weakening of crude could result in even more withdrawals.  Moreover, given the substantial YoY increase, it’s important to recall that there are fiscal limits imposed on fund withdrawals equal to 4% of assets, or roughly $36 billion, which could come into play at some point in the future if oil prices remain “lower for longer.”

Norway

Of course the withdrawals accelerated just as the heavily oil-dependent economy of Norway started to absorb the impact of lower oil prices.

Norway

 

And what do you do when you depend on portfolio returns to fund everyday living expenses but are faced with extremely low returns courtesy of artificially depressed international bond yields?  Well, you just buy more equities, of course.  Which, as we noted back in December, was exactly the motivation behind a decision to increase the fund’s equity allocation from 60%, to a staggering 75%, all while funneling another $130 billion to the global equity bubble.

The central bank’s board, which oversees the fund, on Thursday recommended an increase in the equity share to 75 percent from 60 percent. That will raise the expected average annual real return to 2.5 percent over 10 years and to 3.5 percent over 30 years, compared with 2.1 percent and 2.6 percent, respectively, under the current setup

The world’s largest sovereign wealth fund said that it expects an annual return of only 0.25 percent on bonds over the next decade and that the expected “equity risk premium,” or return on stocks over government bonds, will be just 3 percentage points in a cautious estimate.

“In our analyses, this is clearly evident in global data: internationally, growth in firms’ cash flows and equity returns are correlated with growth in the global economy,” Deputy Governor Egil Matsen said in a speech Thursday in Oslo. “Global economic growth in the coming years is expected to be below its historical level. This ‘pessimism’ is partly related to the driving forces behind the low level of the real interest rate.”

But despite their best efforts to protect the principle balance of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund through statutory spending caps and buying more and more equities, Norway’s central bank governor Oystein Olsen warned earlier today that increasing reliance on the fund to cover budget deficits could result in a “sharp reduction” in the fund’s capital over the next 10 years.  Per Bloomberg:

Governor Oystein Olsen said that the continued rise in oil cash spending, which now accounts for about 20 percent of the budget and 8 percent of gross domestic product, must now be halted to protect the $900 billion fund, the world’s largest sovereign pool of cash.

“With a high level of oil revenue spending, there’s a risk of a sharp reduction in the fund’s capital,” Olsen said in the traditional Annual Address in Oslo Thursday. “This could, for example, happen if a global recession triggers both a decline in oil revenue and low or negative returns on the fund’s capital.”

In fact, in some of the more dire scenarios, Olsen warned that 50% of the fund’s $900 billion in assets could be wiped out over the next 10 years in the event of a global recession that kept oil prices low while also driving equity valuations down.

While the fund, which is overseen by the central bank, so far has said it’s more than able to handle outflows without selling assets, Olsen’s speech did lift the lid to reveal some of the worst case scenarios being calculated by the investor.

For example, it sees a 1 percent chance of a 50 percent decline over 10 years if spending is kept at the current level of about 3 percent of the fund. If spending is raised to 4 percent that probability rises to about 5 percent. If the fund’s allocation to stocks is boosted to 75 percent from 60 percent, which is currently being discussed, the probabilities rise even further to about 2 percent and 6 percent, respectively.

“This shows what you may risk if you increase oil spending from today’s level,” Olsen said in a separate interview. “This helps us to strengthen the message.”

“It must be recognized, however, that the longer-term challenges facing the the Norwegian economy can’t be resolved by spending more oil revenue and keeping interest rates low,” he said in the speech, arguing the Norwegian economy needs more legs to stand on.

That said, we wouldn’t be too worried because equity prices never go down, right?  Silly Central Banker…

Some Good News For Active Managers: First Weekly Mutual Fund Inflow In 12 Months


Tyler Durden's picture

Finally some good news for active managers. After one year of consecutive outflows, last week saw the first inflows into long-only equity mutual funds going back to last February, as according to BofA there finally was a $0.5 billion cash inflow, “a sign of rising investor confidence & broadening participation in equity rally.” However, to put this number in context, at the same time inflows to ETFs amounted to $17.2 billion, some 35 time more.

BofA’s Michael Hartnett summarizes the latest fund flows in two words: “Risk-on.”

The details: largest equity inflows in 9 weeks ($17.7bn), 8th consecutive week of bond inflows ($6.7bn), precious metals inflows in 4 of past 5 weeks ($1.2bn), largest EM equity fund inflows in 6 months ($2.7bn); largest financials inflows in 3 months ($2.3bn); 14 straight weeks of inflows to bank loan funds; inflows in 11 of past 12 weeks to HY bond funds. However, European equity fund flows remain lackluster.

Looking at credit, BofA notes “IG dissonance” with chunky $37bn IG bond fund inflows past 4 months even though US IG bonds are down 3% over that period. Harnett warns that further IG underperformance
could lead to bout of IG bond redemptions

According to BofA’s proprietary fund flow indicator, private clients are also in reflation mode with the past 4 weeks have seen big buyers of credit (HY, bank loans, IG, EM debt) and inflation-plays (financials, materials, precious metals) at the expense of defensives (low-vol, staples, utilities) and yield-plays (dividend-income, REITs, munis)

Going back to Hartnett’s favorite topic, the so-called “Icarus Trade” profiled previously, he says “we remain long risk until Positioning turns dangerously bullish. Our Bull & Bear Indicator of investor sentiment now up to 6.8 (most bullish since Jul’14)…”sell” when indicator reaches euphoric territory of >8.0. Sustained inflows to EM equity, EM debt & HY bond funds and FMS cash falling toward 4.0% over next 6-8 weeks would trigger contrarian “sell” signal.”

Finally, some more fund flow details broken down by asset class:

Asset Class Flows

  • Equities: 7 straight weeks of inflows (big $17.7bn) ($17.2bn ETF inflows and $0.5bn mutual fund inflows) (first weekly mutual fund inflows in 12 months!)
  • Bonds: 8 straight weeks of inflows ($6.7bn)
  • Precious metals: $1.2bn inflows (inflows in 4 of past 5 weeks)
  • Money-markets: $11.2 outflows

Fixed Income Flows

  • Inflows to HY bond funds in 11 of past 12 weeks ($1.0bn)
  • Inflows to EM debt funds in 6 of past 7 weeks ($1.3bn)
  • 8 straight weeks of IG bond inflows ($4.1bn)
  • 14 straight weeks of inflows to bank loan funds ($1.0bn)
  • 10 straight weeks of inflows to TIPS funds ($0.5bn)
  • $1.2bn outflows from govt/tsy funds (largest in 8 weeks)

Equity Flows

  • EM: largest EM equity fund inflows in 6 months ($2.7bn) (mostly via Global EM funds)
  • Japan: 6 straight weeks of inflows ($0.9bn)
  • Europe: tiny $73mn inflows (4 straight weeks)
  • US: $8.6bn inflows (largest in 9 weeks)
  • By sector: strong $2.3bn inflows to financial funds (largest in 13 weeks); largest inflows to consumer funds in 2 years ($1.1bn); inflows to materials in 14 of past 15 weeks ($0.8bn); inflows to energy in 10 of past 11 weeks ($0.5bn)

Source: BofA

S&P Futures, Global Stocks Slide As European Political Fears Return; Gold Jumps


Tyler Durden's picture

S&P equity futures followed Asian and European stocks lower, driven by weakness in Franch and Italian markets, as French political concerns returned; the pound tumbled after UK monthly retail sales unexpectedly dropped pushing the dollar higher and Euro lower.

About an hour after the European open, major indices experienced softness despite no fundamental catalyst to see Euro Stoxx 50 lower by 0.5%.  The euro weakened and French bonds declined after the French Socialist Party’s presidential candidate, Benoit Hamon, said he’s in talks with far-left candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon about a single candidacy that would increase the likelihood of a stand -off with far-right front runner Marine le Pen, sending 10y OAT yields up 5bps and 6bps wider against Germany. Gold rebounded 0.2% as a quiet push into safe assets continued.

Global equity markets are set to end the week on a softer footing on Friday, after setting record highs in the previous two sessions, as investors looked for clarity on U.S. President Donald Trump’s policies on tax and trade. Confusion over US fiscal and monetary policy has grown as traders have gone back and forth assessing the prospects for President Donald Trump’s economics plans and the timing of U.S. interest-rate increases. Financial conditions have continued to tighten as March rate hike odds jumped after Yellen’s congressional testimony: the renewed uptick in 3M OIS and LIbor have yet to impact broader asset classes.

Trump’s plans last week to unveil a “phenomenal” tax policy spurred a rally in stocks, the dollar and emerging-market assets. In Congressional testimony this week, Yellen warned against waiting too long to tighten policy and said a healthier economy may warrant higher interest rates.

Speaking to Bloomberg, Naeem Aslam, chief market analyst at Think Markets said “many do believe that the market is getting ahead of itself and there is just too much optimism about how far Trump can go with his fiscal and tax plans as he still needs full approval from congress,” said “The chances of that are not that great and this is what makes some investors a little pessimistic.”

Much of the action was again in currencies, with the USDJPY sliding most of the overnight session, dragging global risk sentiment lower. Although the dollar was 0.3 percent firmer on the day, it was hovering near a one-week low against a basket of currencies .DXY and headed for its sixth week of losses in the last eight, as investors awaited substantive market-friendly news from President Donald Trump on tax reform. The greenback hit a one-month high on Wednesday after U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen supported a near-term rate hike due to signs of robust economic growth. Junichi Ishikawa, senior forex strategist at IG Securities in Tokyo said the dollar’s recent bounce lacked conviction.

“This shows that the market is still trying to work out the implication of President Trump’s policies, of which his approach to trade may not be supportive for the dollar,” he said.

The pound fell half a percent to $1.2427 after data showing retail sales in Britain fell shaprly 0.3% month-on-month last month, on expectations for a 0.9% rise.

The MSCI All-Country World index was headed for its fourth straight week of gains after hitting a record high on Thursday, but Asian and European markets eased as investors cashed in recent gains.

The MSCI’s index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan pulled back 0.2%, Tokyo stocks closed down 0.6 percent and the pan-European STOXX 600 index was 0.5 percent lower, although it remained near its highest level in 13 months.

Equities in Europe fell, paring a second weekly advance, led by commodity producers as prices of industrial metals were dragged down by further signs of tightening liquidity in China.

“It’s too soon to tell what divergent monetary policy will do to equity markets, but higher rates in the U.S. may help financials do better,” said Ramakrishnan.

In commodities, gold was set for its third week of gains as political uncertainty spurred demand for the safe haven precious metal. Spot gold was up 0.2% on the day. Brent crude futures were down 0.8%, paring back earlier gains. OPEC sources told Reuters the producers’ club could extend its output cut in order to rein in global oversupply. Copper was set to end the week lower as profit-taking pared back the price of the three-month copper contract, though concerns over supply from Chilean and Indonesian mines remained.

Bond yields slipped pretty much across the board. Yields on 10Y Treasuries hovered at 2.43% having crept higher during the week on U.S. rate hike speculation, while yields on Europe’s benchmark, German Bunds, were down 3 basis points at 0.32%. There has been a noticeable divide this week, with safe-haven Bunds and other core countries like France and Austria have seeing yields rise, while Spain and Italy have seen theirs fall for the first week in five, helped by some soothing noises from the European Central Bank. The ECB’s minutes on Thursday indicated little appetite for curbing stimulus, setting the scene for a divergence in central bank policy between the U.S. and Europe.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures down 0.3% to 2,339.00
  • STOXX Europe 600 down 0.5% to 368.27
  • German 10Y yield fell 3.0 bps to 0.319%
  • Euro down 0.2% to 1.0650 per US$
  • Brent Futures down 0.1% to $55.57/bbl
  • Italian 10Y yield fell 8.6 bps to 2.156%
  • Spanish 10Y yield rose 0.7 bps to 1.61%
  • MXAP down 0.2% to 144.97
  • MXAPJ down 0.3% to 466.19
  • Nikkei down 0.6% to 19,234.62
  • Topix down 0.4% to 1,544.54
  • Hang Seng Index down 0.3% to 24,033.74
  • Shanghai Composite down 0.9% to 3,202.08
  • Sensex up 0.6% to 28,470.70
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.2% to 5,805.82
  • Kospi down 0.06% to 2,080.58
  • Brent Futures down 0.1% to $55.57/bbl
  • Gold spot up 0.2% to $1,241.35
  • U.S. Dollar Index up 0.2% to 100.67

Top Overnight News from BBG

  • Mnuchin Warned by Japan, Germany as G-20 Sees New Economic Order
  • Sage CEO Says Biotech Firm Has Received Takeover Interest
  • U.S. House Steps Up Effort to Derail Exxon Climate Probe
  • UnitedHealth Accused of Overcharging Medicare by Billions
  • Trump’s Second Pick for Labor Differs More in Style Than Policy
  • Boeing, SpaceX Safety Risks May Delay U.S. Astronaut Travel
  • Macau Casino Stocks Flash Warnings That Preceded 2014 Crash
  • U.K. Retail Sales Unexpectedly Decline as Inflation Bites
  • Calpers, Others to Push Banks on Dakota Access Pipeline: FT

* * *

Asia equity markets traded negative following the subdued lead from the US, where the Nasdaq and S&P 500 ended their string of records, although the DJIA still edged a fresh all-time closing high with minimal gains of 0.04%. ASX 200 (-0.2%) was lower amid a lack of drivers with the index weighed down by the healthcare sector, whilst Nikkei 225 (-0.6%) was the laggard as exporters suffered from the recent JPY strength. China markets were also weak with the Shanghai Comp. (-0.9%) and Hang Seng (-0.4%) dampened after the PBoC’s liquidity operations amounted to a consecutive net weekly drain. 10yr JGBs were higher following advances in T-notes and amid the risk averse sentiment in Japan, while the curve was mixed with mild outperformance in the long-end. PBoC injected CNY 50bIn 7-day reverse repos, CNY 50bIn in 14-day reverse repos and CNY 50bIn in 28-day reverse repos for a net weekly drain of CNY 150bIn vs. Prev. CNY 625bn drain last week.

Top Asian News

  • UOB Profit Declines as Bank Boosts Energy Loan Provisions
  • Singapore’s Economy Expands at Fastest Pace in More Than 5 Years
  • PBOC’s Cash Moves Act to Lower Banks’ Reserve Ratios, Data Show
  • Coal-Loving Indonesian Investor Doubles Down After 39% Gain
  • China’s H Shares Pare Weekly Advance as Banking Rally Stumbles
  • Singapore, Hong Kong Restart Dual-Class Push to Snag IPOs
  • China Futures Volume Surges as Brokers Climb on Looser Curbs

European stocks are also lower, with the Stoxx 600 down 0.5%, as this morning has seen a typically quiet Friday in terms of newsflow, however with price action garnering some attention. Around an hour into equity trade, major indices experiences softness amid no new fundamental catalyst to see Euro Stoxx 50 lower by 0.5%. In terms of a sector specific basis, energy is among the worst performers, while healthcare outperforms after Shire’s earnings yesterday and with AstraZeneca’s Lynparza met its primary endpoint. Elsewhere, the most notable earnings from the past 24 hours has come from Allianz, with an impressive beat and a share buyback program seeing Co. shares soar. In tandem with the downside seen in equities by mid-morning, fixed income markets pushed higher as Bunds retake the 164 level and retrace all the softness seen throughout the week. The US 10Y yield is also approaching pre-Yellen levels at around 2.64.

Top European News

  • ECB Shows Readiness to Flex Rules If Inflation Goal’s at Stake
  • Allianz Plans $3.2 Billion Share Buyback as Profit Climbs (3)
  • U.K.’s Clark Meets PSA Chiefs to Make Case for Vauxhall
  • Sprint by Turkish Stocks Leaves Fund Managers in Starting Blocks
  • Swedish Muzak Startup Ditches Spotify in World Expansion Bid

In currencies, UK retail sales data was the only top tier release for the day, and came in far weaker than expected despite some correction expected due to the drop seen in the previous month. The Jan data missed on all counts, with headline M/M falling 0.3% vs a +0.9% rise expected. GBP was falling ahead of the release, with Cable trade above 1.2500 all too brief and followed up by a move through the 1.2400’s to retest the lows around 1.2385 seen earlier in the week. EUR/GBP raced up towards 0.8600 after a temporary dip towards 0.8500, but it looks as though heavy GBP/JPY sales provided just as much of the impetus as pre 142.00 trade earlier in the day led to an eventual drop below 140.00. The flow may well have been encouraged by the weakness in USD/JPY, which has now dropped below 113.00 putting the support from 112.50 back under threat as UST yields continue to struggle despite this week’s events/data.

In commodities, the Bloomberg Commodity Index fell 0.4 percent, heading for its fourth weekly drop in five. Oil declined 0.2 percent to $53.28 a barrel. Crude is heading for its first weekly decline in five weeks as expanding U.S. crude stockpiles countered output cuts from OPEC and other producing nations. Gold nudged 0.2 percent higher to $1,241.56 an ounce and is and is set for its seventh weekly gain in eight weeks. Front and centre at present is the rise in Gold, and despite the obvious negative correlation with the USD, the risk tone has turned a little to cause some wobbles on Wall Street. The Dow may have eked out some fresh record highs, but not after a confused start exacerbated by the rise in Treasuries. Base metals across the board have eased back off better levels on the week due to risk sentiment also, but minor outperformance seen in Platinum. USD weakness will also underpin Oil prices, but with the growth in inventories dismissed due to the future impact of the OPEC agreed productions, support in WTI looks well established and comfortably ahead of USD50.00, though little to prompt a move on USD55.00+ for now. Support in Brent comes in ahead of USD55.00.

Looking at the day ahead it looks set to be a fairly quiet end to the week. In Europe this morning the only data came from the UK where the January retail sales figures disappointed (-0.3%, Exp. 0.9%, last -1.9%) while in the US this we’ve got the Conference Board’s leading indicator for January. Earnings wise Allianz headlines a small list.

US Event Calendar

  •     10am: Leading Index, est. 0.5%, prior 0.5%
  • * * *

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

On a relatively dull day markets wise the ECB minutes brought a little excitement to European bonds at least. The minutes said that implementing the planned QE programme would “inevitably” require “limited and temporary deviations” from the ECB’s capital key. Although ‘limited’ and ‘temporary’ don’t indicate anything substantial this was still enough to help peripherals rally strongly. Indeed 10y yields in Italy, Spain and Portugal finished -10.3bps, -8.9bps and -10.4bps lower respectively and so tightening their spreads to Bunds which ended -2.5bps on the day. 10y Treasury yields (-4.8bps to 2.445%) also finished lower for the first time since February 8th. Not even a bumper Philly Fed manufacturing index reading which saw the index surge nearly 20pts to 43.3 in February and the highest since 1984 could halt the reversal. The jump in the data was in fact the single biggest in a month since 2009 and came hot on the heels of a decent NY Fed manufacturing survey on Wednesday.

For the most part the reversal for bonds was also the case for risk assets. Despite staging a typical late bounce-back into the close the S&P 500 (-0.09%) finally snapped a run of 7 consecutive daily gains and finished lower for the first time since February 6th. The Dow (+0.04%) did manage to just eke out a small gain and extend the record high for another day although the runs did come to an end for the Nasdaq (-0.08%) and Russell 2000 (-0.36%) indices too. The overall tone in Europe had been relatively soft too (Stoxx 600 -0.37%) with Banks and Energy sectors under pressure. Oil was particularly volatile in the afternoon as we saw WTI touch as high at $53.59/bbl, before tumbling to $52.68/bbl, and then reverse again into the close to actually finish up +0.60% at around $53.36/bbl. A combination of growing US inventories following the latest EIA data and a Reuters report suggesting that OPEC could look to extend the six-month production cut both seemed to play their part.

Elsewhere there was a bit of excitement in the spike up in the VIX (+7.40%) to 12.86 in the early evening which saw it reach a new high for the month, only for the index to completely retrace into the close and end more or less flat. Currencies were a bit more one-way however with the Dollar index (-0.73%) down for the second day in a row following ten successive daily gains. The Yen (+0.81%) was a big beneficiary against that and we’re seeing that weigh on Japanese equities this morning with the Nikkei currently -0.55%. The Hang Seng (-0.15%), ASX (-0.14%) and Kospi (-0.17%) are also down while bourses in China were initially up helped by the news of the China futures exchange relaxing curbs on stock index futures trading, but are now down a similar amount.

Moving on. While there was some focus on the President Trump press conference yesterday, more so for its typical entertainment than any material updates for markets, House Speaker Ryan did emphasise separately that a tax reform “has to happen” and that following the President’s Day break on Monday, the House intends to “introduce legislation and repeal and replace Obamacare”. Ryan also said that a much anticipated border adjustment tax is needed to spur US manufacturing and that currency adjustment would occur with tax law harmonization.

Closer to home, time is ticking down now to the Eurogroup meeting on Monday and it seems that there is growing scepticism out there that a Greek deal will be struck in time. Germany parliamentary members stressed the need to have IMF participation yesterday which they also said is precisely the position taken by euro area finance ministers. The FT also ran an article downplaying hope of an agreement by next week, suggesting instead that a deal may be months away now. While Greece is likely able to stand on its own two feet until July (when heavy bond maturities are due) its looking like any progress will go on the backburner until the Dutch and first round of French elections are out of the way over the next couple of months.

Before we wrap up, the only other data yesterday in the US came in the housing sector where housing starts revealed a suspiring -2.6% mom decline in January (vs. 0.0% expected) but permits jumped a better than expected +4.6% mom (vs. +0.2% expected). Initial jobless claims rose 5k last week to 239k but remain at low levels still. Elsewhere, Fed Vice-Chair Fischer also spoke but didn’t give much away in terms of timing for the next rate hike while also declining to say whether or not he expects two or three moves this year.

While we’re on the Fed, it’s worth drawing your attention to our economists’ latest Global Economic Perspectives piece where they have taken a look at the looming leadership shake-up. They note that President Trump will have considerable scope to reshape the Fed. By April, there will now be at least three vacancies on the seven-seat Board of Governors (following Governor Tarullo’s resignation), whilst Fed Chair Janet Yellen’s term as Chair will end in January next year. They note that at this point there is substantial uncertainty about who could replace Chair Yellen – there has been little indication from the Trump administration about possible candidates. Our team discuss several of the candidates that have been mentioned (these include current Governor Jerome Powell, past Governor Kevin Warsh, and academic John Taylor). Based on Trump’s past comments, the makeup of his economic advisors and appointments, and the political leanings of Congressional Republicans, they argue that it would seem that Trump may prefer a candidate that: (1) has significant experience in markets and/or business (i.e., a market practitioner rather than an academic economist), (2) does not have strong hawkish leanings that would work against Trump’s growth agenda, and (3) does not forcefully reject greater Congressional oversight of the Fed. They write that who occupies the Chair’s seat would be critical for markets in any environment. But Yellen’s replacement could be even more important, as he or she may well preside over an economy that is near full employment and that is given a large dose of fiscal stimulus. This raises the risk that the Fed could fall behind the curve.

Looking at the day ahead it looks set to be a fairly quiet end to the week. In Europe this morning the only data comes from the UK where we’ll get the January retail sales figures (where a rebound is expected) while in the US this afternoon we’ve got the Conference Board’s leading indicator for January. Earnings wise Allianz headlines a small list.

When Sovereign Defaults Create a Depression


1840 Election
The 1840 Presidential Election took place in the midst of a great depression that was set in motion by State Sovereign Defaults after Andrew Jackson shut down the Bank of the United States, which acted as the central bank. There, the incumbent Democrat, President Martin Van Buren suffered a devastating loss to the new unified Whig candidate William H. Harrison who won 234  electoral votes compared to Van Buren’s 60 votes. They were trying to create the image that the economy was recovering and called it the Harrisonian rally. This poster showed a vignette of the log cabin, the barrel of hard cider, and of William H. Harrison behind the plow.

Clearly, the United States presidential election of 1840 demonstrated how much economics plays into the result of an election. President Martin Van Buren did not create the depression. That was set in motion by Andrew Jackson who create the Panic of 1837. Van Buren fought for re-election against an economic depression and State Sovereign Defaults that wiped out the bond markets. The Whig Party unified for the first time behind war hero William Henry Harrison and came back to throw out the Democratic administration. Their slogan has remained famous “Tippecanoe and Tyler, too.”

This election was unique in that electors cast votes for four men who had been or would become President of the United States. President Martin Van Buren, President-elect William Henry Harrison, Vice-President-elect John Tyler, who would succeed Harrison upon his death, and then James K. Polk, who received one electoral vote for Vice President who also became President late on.

1837 Panic

The economy peaked in 1835 with the stock market and declined for 7 years into 1842. Therefore, the 1840 elect of the Whigs did not reverse the trend. It was on September 10th, 1833 when President Andrew Jackson announced that the government would no longer use the Second Bank of the United States, the country’s national bank. He then used his executive power to remove all federal funds from the bank, in the final salvo of what is referred to as the “Bank War.” The market first crashed into 1934, then recovered with a slingshot into 1835, and then the depression was unleashed as the wildcat banks Jackson encouraged went bust and States then issued bonds trying to support the banks. Many states then defaulted on their bonds permanently and we can see that this was the first major sustain correction the United States had ever encountered

Understanding the Rally


gallup-poll-on-media

QUESTION: Marty is the rumor true that there is huge short-covering going on that is taking the US share market higher?

ANSWER: Of course. As I have stated, our model tends to show the point of no return is in the 23000 level, not here. This rally since 2009 has been the most BEARISH rally ever in history. Think of this like the mirror image of gold. Gold has declined for 5 years and you have people screaming here we go with ever $20 rally. In the stock market, it has been exactly the opposite. Every time the market decline, they say here we go it will crash by 70-90%.

This is what I mean that the MAJORITY must always be wrong for they are the fuel that moves markets. I have been stating persistently that the Dow cannot “C R A S H” when the majority are bearish and retail participation is at historic lows (see Gallup poll).

The only buyers have been due to the dollar, and sophisticated traders. The bulk of everyone else are BEARISH and cannot bring themselves to buy for they are still fighting the last rally in 2007 when they got caught.

Fat Lady SingsSo yes, there has been serious short-covering. That has been the bulk of this immediate rally and the relentless new highs each day. Only when the market crosses the 23,500 level do we see people surrendering and saying S H I T this is just going up. Until then, it will rally to each of our levels, stop briefly, and then proceed as long as we do not hit a turning point in TIME.

Others will point to this to then proclaim – See. This rally is not real and it will crash by 90% any moment now. This is why it is not over until the fat lady sings – or perhaps in this case, goes broke and screams.

GC 1985-D Low

Here is the gold low in 1985. It bottomed on February 26th and on March 18th-19th a panic short-covering began. It was not people going long. It was shorts in panic. Merrill Lynch at that time hired me to TEACH one of their clients in Switzerland how to trade. They said they would pay all expenses and pay my hourly rate for the entire time even sleeping. I ask who the hell was this? It turned out he created the biggest deficit in history up to that point $25 million in gold. He was short and that is the loss over and above what he had in the account. Keep in mind the biggest hedge fund was $100 million back then.

It is routinely short-covering that created the major breakouts and lows, just as it is panic selling from longs that cement major highs. This is why I say after years of being called in to some of the biggest disasters in trading over the last 40 years, my conclusion is simply the MAJORITY must always be wrong.

I support this petition which is to give students a break that they need


I agree that we have to make the student loan dis-chargeable again in the bankruptcy court. This petition, below, needs 150 signatures to get the attention of the White House. The economics of higher education are in crisis: tuition’s are soaring, with increases in college and school costs outpacing inflation students are exiting college and graduate school more indebted than ever has transformed student loans into the largest source of consumer indebtedness after mortgages. To make matters worse, all of this comes as the value of higher education is being called into question. With returns sinking and tuition’s, indebtedness, and defaults surging, the need for higher education financial reform is pressing. Students are unlikely to be able to repay, and § 523(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code exacerbates the effects of such burdensome debt by allowing private and federal student loans to be discharged only upon a showing of “Undue Hardship.” Please sign this petition.

We the people should ask the Congress to repeal 11 USC § 523(a)(8), which the statute states that “unless excepting such [student loan] debt from discharge under this paragraph would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents.” This is the petition: You now have 30 days to get 99,999 signatures in order for your petition to be reviewed by the White House. Until your petition has 150 signatures, it will only be available from the following URL and will not be publicly viewable on the Open Petitions section of We the People:

Student Loan Petition to White House


Student Loan

REQUEST:  Dear Mr. Armstrong: I am trying to discharge student loan in the bankruptcy court, and it is very tough battle. I am in the situation that it is all out war with the U.S. Department of Education. I have been reading your blog for more than a year now and found that we have common grounds. I agree that we have to make the student loan dischargeable again in the bankruptcy court. I humbly and respectfully request for your help to promote my petition to the White House that We the people should ask the Congress to repeal 11 USC § 523(a)(8), which the statute states that “unless excepting such [student loan] debt from discharge under this paragraph would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents.” This is the petition I created recently: You now have 30 days to get 99,999 signatures in order for your petition to be reviewed by the White House. Until your petition has 150 signatures, it will only be available from the following URL and will not be publicly viewable on the Open Petitions section of We the People:

REPLY: I will sign your petition. I would point out that this was pay-back from the Clintons to the bankers. The logic was that a student has no collateral, so eliminate bankruptcy protection. The Clintons agreed.  Then the bankers still wanted parents to cosign. Thus, this was the greatest fraud that the Democrats pulled off to help the bankers and eliminate bankruptcy protection for even the parents.

Hillary-StudentsBankruptcy in the United States is governed under the US Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4) which authorizes Congress to enact “uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.” To exclude students violate the Due Process clause and Equal Protection Clause. Supreme Court case of Allgeyer v. Louisiana in 1897, the Court came to the conclusion that the Due Process Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment extended to private contracts as well, allowing such liberties as “freedom of contract” to be enforced without the implementation of various social and economic regulations passed by Federal and State governments.

This is discrimination for the government should NOT be allowed to discriminate also against a class of people, not just race or creed. All the students whose teachers allow them to cut class and protest against Trump for his immigration ban for 120 days, would never allow their students to do the same on this issue for schools will not have it so easy if they have to compete for students and provide degrees that are worth something. Forbes Magazine reported that 60% of students cannot find a job in what they paid for.

Therefore, the education system also violates consumer fraud statutes. The definition is: Deceptive practices that result in financial or other losses for consumers in the course of seemingly legitimate business transactions.

I believe there are many grounds to challenge this, but it takes time to get to the Supreme Court, probably 5 years at best. Your petition is a good way to start. It is a shame that these protesters against Trump are so ignorant of the real issues than a 120 ban on immigration.

Fed & Its Balance Sheet


yellen Janet

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; At the WEC you said the Fed would allow its balance sheet to eventually shrink, it was trapped and could not sell off its holdings. Yellen seems to have come out and said the same thing. Is this advice you have given in Washington?

XM

ANSWER: What Yellen has said is that the main tool for setting monetary policy would remain the fed funds rate, not shrinking its balance sheet. It cannot shrink its balance sheet right now for that would be deflationary. Yes, she said that the Fed would likely reduce the size of  its balance sheet over time, but it would KEEP reinvesting proceeds from MATURING Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities for now to “maintain accomodative conditions.

This is Yellen confirming what I have warned about. The central banks are trapped. They can NEVER sell the bonds they bought, and the best they could do is allow them to mature. However, that would still be deflationary and result in sending rates higher. Yellen’s comments make it appear that the Fed will raise rates to what it perceives to be a neutral rate before making adjustments to the size of the balance sheet.

yellen-draghi

Therefore, looking at our arrays, it appears the May/June period may be the next target for a rate hike. However, keep in mind that we have the French elections. That can send the dollar rising even more as the Euro caves in. Make no mistake about this. The position of Yellen is responding to the domestic conditions and the breakup of the EU is looking ever more imminent. Therefore, Draghi has been proven to be completely wrong in his attempts to manage the economy of Europe. Instead of creating a recovery, he has deepened the divide and brought the EU to the brink of collapse. Raising rates on Yellen’s party is doing exactly what I warned would unfold. As the dollar strengthens and Europe looks more questionable, the capital flows to the dollar creating the appearance of an asset bubble.

The mainstream media have declared outright war on Trump. The higher the stock market, the more they will turn and blame trump saying he is just making his rich friends richer. This will feed back and compel the Fed to raise rates more to stop the asset bubble, which in turn will attract more capital to the dollar while sending emerging markets over the cliff.

russia-capital-flows-10-13-2016

Welcome to the new exciting world of international capital flows.

Brussels Circumvented the Legal Rights of Citizens in EU


 

EU ParliamentOn January 18, 2017, new rules governing the seizure of bank accounts in the European Union went into effect (The EU Regulation No 655/2014 of May 15, 2014). This regulation sought to circumvent the independent legal rights of people, denying them the right to be heard in a court of law in their own country. This has created a European Account Preservation Order (EAPO) which is to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters. The European Commission described the EAPO as a “simple and cost-effective way to block funds that are owed” by a creditor in another member state. What this really means is that a CREDITOR no longer needs to run to an Italian court to sue an Italian debtor. In other words, this order dismembers the sovereignty of the member states legal courts.

Until now, a creditor who is owed money by a debtor in another EU country had to apply to a court in the debtor’s state of residence in accordance with the domestic law of that member state if he wanted to freeze the debtor’s bank accounts. In the Commission’s opinion, this was often too time-consuming and too expensive. In the United States, you still must go after a debtor in their home state and apply by the local laws.

The new European procedure was designed to be quicker, cheaper, and more efficient for creditors, but it then would demand that someone in Italy would have to hire a lawyer in Germany to defend them there. The costs are being shifted to the debtor rather than the creditor under this EAPO.

Basically, it has become possible for your accounts in your bank to be seized domiciled in the European Union doing away with all local legal protection. The danger here is someone in Germany can freeze your bank account in Italy in proceedings commenced in another member state and ex parte – meaning without you even appearing.

Any court of a member state can grant an EAPO, provided that it has jurisdiction to hear the underlying case on its merits under the European Union’s rules on jurisdiction. Therefore, under the Brussels I Regulation Recast, Germany has implemented the EAPO procedure in Sections 946 to 959 German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).

There is not even a limitation for the application for a EAPO can be made at any stage of the main proceedings. Therefore, you can be in a court in Italy and a court in Germany can freeze your account in the middle of a litigation or even before main proceedings have been issued, denying you the right to use funds to hire a lawyer. Article 7 (1) of the Regulation reads:

“The court shall issue the Preservation Order when the creditor has submitted sufficient evidence to satisfy the court that there is an urgent need for a protective measure in the form of a Preservation Order because there is a real risk that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the creditor’s claim against the debtor will be impeded or made substantially more difficult.”

If the application is made before or during proceedings, and no judgment has therefore been obtained yet, the applicant must also show, in accordance with Article 7 (2), that they have a bona fide good case and are likely to succeed on the merits:

“Where the creditor has not yet obtained in a Member State a judgment, court settlement or authentic instrument requiring the debtor to pay the creditor’s claim, the creditor shall also submit, sufficient evidence to satisfy the court that he is likely to succeed on the substance of his claim against the debtor.”

The interesting aspect of this EAPO mechanism is how it actually also creates the right to search for bank accounts of a debtor throughout Europe. Article 14 provides for a request to obtain bank account information:

 “Where the creditor has obtained in a Member State an enforceable judgment, court settlement or authentic instrument which requires the debtor to pay the creditor’s claim and the creditor has reasons to believe that the debtor holds one or more accounts with a bank in a specific Member State, but knows neither the name and/or address of the bank nor the IBAN, BIC or another bank number allowing the bank to be identified, he may request the court with which the application for the Preservation Order is lodged to request that the information authority of the Member State of enforcement obtain the information necessary to allow the bank or banks and the debtor’s account or accounts to be identified.”

However, the EAPO is NOT available in the entire EU. Denmark and Britain have opted out of this Regulation. Ireland is really screwed since they could have opted out, but chose not to do so.