The Head of Pfizer is a Veterinarian


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Sep 25, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

Albert Bourla is a veterinarian and not a medical doctor who is making a fortune selling his vaccines, not for animals – but people. He is the chairman and chief executive officer of Pfizer, after joining the company back in 1993. He use to be the chief operating officer.

He has COVID again. It seems that those who took the vaccine are developing immune deficiency to COVID like Biden who keeps getting it multiple times. I am not vaccinated, had it once, and that was it. When my daughter insisted I should go to Tampa Hospital to see the head of pulmonary, I said I was tested 5 times and it was always negative. He said the tests were not valid and they still think it was COVID. I went to a new doctor after my old one retired, when he asked if I was vaccinated and I said NO!, I was waiting for the propaganda. He said – Good!

Since this veterinarian tells the world we must be vaccinated, he seems to then listen to the CDC on how to take his own shit. When history is written about this period, I do not think it will be kind to this veterinarian handing out medical advice to people.

I would always make sure my kids were vaccinated. I would take the flu shot sometimes. Now, I will not take anything that comes from Pfizer. I would not trust this guy, especially with my dog. No wonder – he never had to take the Hippocratic Oath.

UK Bans COVID Vaccine for Children Under 12


Armstrong Economics Blog/BRITAIN Re-Posted Sep 14, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

Big Pharma is continually pushing these vaccinations onto every member of the global population. Yet, the data coming out (eventually) cannot be ignored. UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) claims that “the offer of Covid jabs to healthy five to 11-year-olds was always meant to be temporary.” How can a gene-modifying mRNA vaccine be temporary?

This “safe and effective” vaccine has ruined lives. The CDC reported 54,697 adverse side effects in children ranging from 6 months to 17 years of age, including “death, life-threatening illness, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, permanent disability, congenital anomaly or birth defect.” This is only what has been reported as the long-term consequences are now coming to light.

Dr. Robert Malone, who has been shunned from social media, has long warned of these “adverse side effects.” Dr. Malone noted more children had been harmed from the COVID vaccination than from COVID itself. “The UK, Sweden, Poland, and many other nations have it right. They stopped vaccinating babies and children. Parents have it right. The vast majority aren’t vaccinating babies and children,” Malone stated. “It is time that the US government to face facts. It is time to stop vaccinating babies and children.”

Sadly, this data is not new. Countries are QUIETLY eliminating childhood vaccinations, and pharmaceutical companies remain immune to any liability for the damage they have caused and the lives they have ruined. Yet, here in America, some schools are still demanding children receive the jab to attend class. It is time that we protect our children from this mass experiment.

Omicron Boosters Untested On Humans: Can Doctors Be Punished For Questioning Safety? – Ask Dr. Drew



Dr. Drew 
Published originally on Rumble on September 6, 2022 10,681 Views

Dr. Drew answers your calls LIVE on AB 2098 (California’s “medical misinformation” bill), new Omicron boosters that weren’t tested on humans, Dr. Fauci’s recent statements on annual COVID-19 shots, and more from your questions!

Study, No Quantifiable Benefits from COVID Treatment Drug Paxlovid for People Aged 40 to 65


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on August 25, 2022 | Sundance 


In April 2022, the Biden administration ordered 20 million doses of Pfizer’s antiviral Covid-19 treatment called Paxlovid.

Now a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows the medication shows “no measurable benefit” for the treatment of COVID-19 in patients 40 to 65-years of age.

WASHINGTON — Pfizer’s COVID-19 pill appears to provide little or no benefit for younger adults, while still reducing the risk of hospitalization and death for high-risk seniors, according to a large study published Wednesday.

The results from a 109,000-patient Israeli study are likely to renew questions about the U.S. government’s use of Paxlovid, which has become the go-to treatment for COVID-19 due to its at-home convenience. The Biden administration has spent more than $10 billion purchasing the drug and making it available at thousands of pharmacies through its test-and-treat initiative.

The researchers found that Paxlovid reduced hospitalizations among people 65 and older by roughly 75% when given shortly after infection. That’s consistent with earlier results used to authorize the drug in the U.S. and other nations.

But people between the ages of 40 and 65 saw no measurable benefit, according to the analysis of medical records. (read more)

“Huh, imagine that”…

Bye, Bye Fauci… Trish Regan Show S3/E147


The Trish Regan Show Published originally on Rumble on August 22, 2022 

#TrishRegan #Fauci #Fed
Markets are waiting on Jerome Powell’s speech at Jackson Hole this Friday…and any way you slice it, it won’t be good for the economy or for Wall Street. Powell messed up bigtime and the American economy is stuck paying the price. On the bright side, Anthony Fauci is (finally) retiring! Join me for a look at today’s headlines.

Lockdowns 20X Deadlier Than COVID


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Aug 23, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health published a study that found the lockdowns were deadly. In fact, the lockdowns were 20 times more deadly than COVID. The lockdowns were a mass human experiment. There was no evidence that indicated this method would be effective. We saw the impact that the lockdowns had on the global economy, but their effects on the human mind are now coming to light.

“The comparative analysis of different countries showed that the assumption of lockdowns’ effectiveness cannot be supported by evidence—neither regarding the present COVID-19 pandemic, nor regarding the 1918–1920 Spanish Flu and other less-severe pandemics in the past. The price tag of lockdowns in terms of public health is high: by using the known connection between health and wealth, we estimate that lockdowns may claim 20 times more life years than they save. It is suggested therefore that a thorough cost-benefit analysis should be performed before imposing any lockdown for either COVID-19 or any future pandemic.”

Forcing people into isolation is a tactic used in prison for punishment. Everyone’s mental health suffered as life as we knew it simply halted. People lost their livelihoods, were unable to see loved ones, and were forced to tip toe around society when they emerged for essentials. Kids fell behind in school and socialization. One of the most deadly aspects, however, was the way healthcare facilities managed COVID patients.

“The lockdown policies had a direct side effect of increasing mortality. Hospitals in Europe and USA were prepared to manage pretty small groups of highly contagious patients, while unprepared for a much more probable challenge—large-scale contagion. As a result, public health care facilities and nursing homes often became vehicles of contamination themselves—to a large extent because of the lockdown-based emergency policy implementation.”

Governor Cuomo of New York tried to hide the deaths that occurred in nursing homes. Over 9,000 infected patients in New York alone were discharged from hospitals and sent into nursing homes. This resulted in thousands of unnecessary deaths. No one was ever held responsible for that decision.

“Another comparison can be made if we remember that the average age of people dying of COVID-19 was around 80, with 3–6 QALY per death lost. Therefore, 500,000 QALY are equivalent to roughly 100,000 COVID-19 deaths. Even if we assume that lockdowns saved 1.5 daily deaths per million [20] for a whole year (365 days), after multiplying by 9.2 million (population of Israel) we arrive at about 5000 lives saved—just about 5% of the lockdowns’ human cost. In other words, it can be estimated that even if the lockdowns saved some lives, in the long term they killed 20 times more.”

There is no evidence to suggest that the lockdowns were effective. Even if the lockdowns worked as intended, they directly caused more deaths than they were intended to prevent.

Fauci Out


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on August 22, 2022 | Sundance

The modern Narcissus known as Anthony Fauci announces his departure:

STATEMENT – “I am announcing today that I will be stepping down from the positions of Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Chief of the NIAID Laboratory of Immunoregulation, as well as the position of Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden. I will be leaving these positions in December of this year to pursue the next chapter of my career.” (more)

Joe Biden releases a statement praising Fauci for his national service:

WHITE HOUSE – “Because of Dr. Fauci’s many contributions to public health, lives here in the United States and around the world have been saved.  As he leaves his position in the U.S. Government, I know the American people and the entire world will continue to benefit from Dr. Fauci’s expertise in whatever he does next.” (more)

Departure just after the midterm elections.

Fauci: The Epitome For Getting Rich From Corporatism


The Ron Paul Liberty Report Published originally on Rumble on August 19, 2022

“Corporatism” is when power (government), money (corporations), and propaganda (media) merge together to repeatedly rip-off the people at large. The antithesis to this “system” is severely limited government, sound money and free markets. But as long as the people at large resist their freedom, the rip-off machine will happily continue on to the next “latest thing.”

UNKNOWN Cause of Death? Our Latest Propaganda!


Awaken With JP Published originally on Rumble on August 20, 2022 

Welcome to our special in depth report on the new Unknown Cause of Death phenomenon!

mRNA Injections Dosage is Probabilistic. Conformity with Label Cannot Be Verified.


By Sasha Latypova Posted originally on the conservative tree house on Aug. 18, 2022, 7:00 p.m.

Writer at Independent | mRNA Fraud – Regulatory and Manufacturing Investigations

Journalist Article

Pfizer’s mRNA injections are supplied in multiple dose vials.  There are several versions available today, however the most widely used is the “purple cap” vial.  This version has been supplied from the beginning of the injections roll out globally.  Both, the EUA BNT162b2 product and the “fully FDA approved” (but strangely unavailable in the US) version of COMIRNATY come in the purple cap format.  The image below shows both products.  Did you spot the difference?

If you are wondering whether the vials simply contain different amounts of finished drug product and different quantities of each ingredient to account for the different number of doses, I have the answer – they do not.  Indeed, it would be a bad pharmaceutical practice to have identical looking vials containing different dosage of the same product.   

Review of Pfizer’s Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls module from EMA materials obtained via a data leak at the end of 2020 revealed the following information about the ingredients, dosage, and the total volume of the finished product in the vials:

Clearly, this means a 0.45 mL of drug product, when diluted with 1.8 mL of saline is supposed to deliver 5 doses of 30 mcg of mRNA each.  The same dosage information, was provided in Pfizer’s briefing document for the FDA VRBPAC meeting on December 10, 2020, requesting the initial Emergency Use Authorization.

The label dosage information for Pfizer COMIRNATY currently available on the FDA website.  Section 11 lists the ingredients in text form.  The quantities per dose listed are the same as were provided in the FDA and EMA documents at the end of 2020.  The total supplied volume of product in the vial is also the same – 0.45ml and calls for the same amount of the dilutant to arrive at the individual doses. 

  • “COMIRNATY […] supplied as a frozen suspension in multiple dose vials with purple caps […]; each vial must be diluted with 1.8 mL of sterile 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP […]. Each 0.3 mL dose of COMIRNATY supplied in multiple dose vials with purple caps […]contains 30 mcg of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. Each 0.3 mL dose of the COMIRNATY […] also includes the following ingredients: lipids (43 mg ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 0.05 mg 2-(polyethylene glycol 2000)-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 0.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and 0.2 mg cholesterol), 0.01 mg potassium chloride, 0.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate, 0.36 mg sodium chloride, 0.07 mg dibasic sodium phosphate 20 dihydrate, and 6 mg sucrose. The diluent (sterile 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP) contributes an additional 2.16 mg sodium chloride per dose.”

The math clearly doesn’t add up: 225 mcg of the active mRNA substance in a vial equals to 50 mcg in a 5-dose vial and 38 mcg in a 6-dose one. 

The explanation of this apparent mystery is that the mRNA injection ingredients are specified by weight while the dose administration is by liquid volume.  No direct translation is possible.  At the injection administration site, the untrained and unsupervised vaccinators who, no doubt, will be thrown under the proverbial bus first when this scam fully unravels, are involved in the last phase of mRNA product manufacturing – the making of the individual doses, outside of any possibility of quality control by the pharmaceutical company.  If you are wondering if this violates the FD&C Act – yes, it does.   This is like the illicit drug dealers cutting cocaine by hand in a basement lab, however, much less precise.   

The vials, after dilution, contain 7.5 doses by liquid volume, and they always did.  Pfizer relabeled vials from 5 to 6 doses without making any changes to the product but rewarding themselves with 20% more revenue while selling the same vials with the same effective number of doses.  Genius.  The dose therefore is probabilistic.  Assuming the ingredients, and especially mRNA distribute absolutely evenly in the vial after someone manually injects saline into it, turns it over 10 times, and then leaves it in the fridge for 6 hours, then each dose may be 30 mcg of mRNA.  However, that’s a silly assumption.  Of course, they do not.  A technician draws a dose, lets the vial sit for 6 hours, draws some more doses, forgets it’s 6 hours, or forgets to put the vial into the fridge, and then decides that they too should make an extra buck by drawing the 7th dose from what is supposed to be only 5 or 6 doses – there are numerous scenarios that can be imagined (and are documented in VAERS database and other sources). 

mRNA and LNPs are known to be highly unstable and to degrade rapidly.  They also will not distribute evenly in a vial as this is a manually made water-fat mixture with fat tending to float to the top, especially after several hours.  The doses are extremely uneven in composition of ingredients, some will contain 50%+ more mRNA and would this introduce 5-6 trillion extra mRNA molecules in the injection which will distribute all over the body in minutes, rapidly make toxic spikes, and may kill a person quickly.  Pfizer’s internal pharmacovigilance report obtained by FOIA had thousands of severe adverse events and deaths documented in 2 months after roll-out with median onset below 48 hrs.  Some doses will end up containing mostly water.  We are all familiar with the fact that lots of people have no adverse events after the injections, while many thousands have died, got severely injured and permanently disabled by these injections.  My own educated guess on this topic is that the doses from freshly opened and stirred vials would be the deadliest ones.  The doses that were drawn from the vials that set on a shelf for a while, especially if the syringe is taking the liquid from the bottom of the container first will tend to be mostly harmless.

This was never tested by any regulator as no acceptance criteria for vials/doses exist.  Batches of the product are released based on self-declared testing of the bulk products by the manufacturer.  Nobody can know the composition of the shots as they are administered to people with catastrophic consequences.  These products are fraudulent by design and product conformity with its label cannot be verified.