I support The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act currently in committee in the US House of Representatives as HR 5194 because… the Muslim Brotherhood is, in fact, a terrorist group whose sole purpose is to make America a Muslim country under Sharia law. We see every day the violence that is pervasive in all the countries that are dominated by the Muslim way of life and I do not think that civilized people wish to live that way, I know I don’t.

I urge you to read the rest of this post and then you can do the same and here is the link to PopVox which makes it easy to do. It would also help if you contact your representative to congress and tell them they need to pass this bill.

What follows is a quick summary of decades of study by many good honest Christian and Jewish Americans whom going back to Thomas Jefferson knew that Islam and Western Civilization, which was based on Judo/Christian beliefs, are not compatible in any way shape or form.

Based on a situation in Maryland by an alert State Trooper in 2004 a web of deceit unwound around the infiltration of radical Islamic terrorists know as the Muslim Brotherhood the same group that took over Egypt a few years ago and were later thrown out and many executed for what they did. The arrest of the Maryland Brotherhood terrorists eventually resulting in the Holy Land Foundation Trial convictions in 2008 of many of those Brotherhood members involved in supporting Hamas and the identification of many of the other groups spawned by the radials that mean to bring down America and turn it into a Muslim state not governed under the U.S. Constitution but ruled under Muslim Sharia Law which is much like their Constitution.

Sharia Law has little to do with religion but a lot to do with how the citizens subject to it are ruled. Suffice it to say that it is, in essence, a codification of the tribal laws of the Arabian Peninsula in the 7th century. This was a barbaric time where women were brutalized and consider not much use other than for breeding and they, as if cattle, were commonly sold as any property could be. Sharia Law also forces those that follow it into a constant state of war known as Jihad, which is nothing more than the physical conquest of the entire world such that all humans would be subject to Sharia dictates.

The following is from The Center for Security Policy

Want to know what our Islamist enemies have in mind for America? Look at Europe.
Virtually every country there has found itself under siege from Muslims seeking to impose the supremacist Islamic doctrine they call shariah on everyone else. The preeminent organization promoting this agenda is the Muslim Brotherhood, now banned as a terrorist group in its home country of Egypt, but prospering in the United Kingdom and elsewhere in what has been known as the Free World. In fact, as Egyptian courts hand down death sentences to those engaged with the Brotherhood’s violent efforts to overthrow the government there, ours is opening the door to asylum for those who have only engaged in “limited” material support for terrorism.

More insidious than the Muslim Brotherhood’s violence, however, is its stealthy subversion. In a 1991 strategic plan introduced into evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial, a senior Brother named Mohammed Akram described this form of warfare as “civilization jihad.”

In Akram’s words, the goal of the Brotherhood’s civilization jihadists is “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within…so that God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” His “Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” lays out how this ambitious goal is to be achieved under our noses by penetrating and subverting “from within” the West’s civil society and governing institutions.

The London Telegraph reports that this campaign has just scored a major success in Great Britain. That country’s trade association for lawyers, the Law Society, has declared its members can begin drawing up shariah-compliant wills that will be enforceable in British common law courts.

As the Telegraph put it on March 22nd:

“Under ground-breaking guidance, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether.

“The documents, which would be recognized by Britain’s courts, will also prevent children born out of wedlock – and even those who have been adopted – from being counted as legitimate heirs.

“Anyone married in a church, or in a civil ceremony, could be excluded from succession under Shariah principles, which recognize only Muslim weddings for inheritance purposes.”
Such inroads are coming on top of the presence of something on the order of 87 shariah courts that operate side-by-side with Britain’s own judiciary. As one of the U.K.’s most courageous opponents of such practices, Baroness Caroline Cox, told the Telegraph: “No longer do we have a single legal code in our society. Instead, alongside our own law, there is now effectively a parallel quasi-legal system operating within some Muslim communities.”

Think that cannot happen here? Think again. The Muslim Brotherhood’s largest front group in this country, the Islamic Society of North America, requires each of its chapters to maintain arbitration panels that serve as proto-shariah courts. It is a matter of time before Islamists and their apologists begin demanding that such courts be allowed to adjudicate disputes not just between willing parties, but in cases where one party – most likely women and/or children – would prefer to have the protections of our Constitution.
Worse yet, as a study published by the Center for Security Policy in 2011 has documented, there have been at least 27 different instances in which U.S. courts have allowed the use of shariah law to govern – even where doing so has violated constitutional rights of the plaintiffs or defendants. (An updated version of this study now nearing completion indicates that, as of today, there are many more such cases.)

As a corrective to this civilization jihadist incursion into American jurisprudence, seven states have adopted legislation known as American Laws for American Courts (ALAC). If they wish to avoid the fate now facing British citizens who are likely to be denied their rightful inheritances and, in due course, other privations at the hands of shariah, every state in the country should adopt ALAC.

Of course, our Constitution’s Article VI declares that it is the supreme law of the land. But that will no long be the case if the civilization jihadists have their way. We must ensure that shariah is not allowed to undermine that constitutional precept – to the detriment of women, children and the rest of us.

From Wikipedia we have:

The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in the United States. Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, it was originally known as Occupied Land Fund. In December 2001, the U.S. government designated HLF a terrorist organization, seized its assets, and closed the charity. In 2004, a federal grand jury in Dallas, Texas charged HLF and five former officers and employees with providing material support to Hamas and related offenses. The prosecution did not allege that HLF funded violence; rather, its theory was that HLF distributed charity through local zakat (charity) committees located in the West Bank; that Hamas controlled those zakat committees; and that by distributing charity through Hamas-controlled committees, HLF helped Hamas win the “hearts and minds” of the Palestinian people.

The first trial, in 2007, ended in the partial acquittal of one defendant and a hung jury on all other charges. The jury did not return any guilty verdicts. At a retrial in 2008, the jury found all defendants guilty on all counts. The 2008 trial of the charity leaders was dubbed the “largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history.” In 2009, the founders of the organization were given sentences of between 15 and 65 years in prison for “funneling $12 million to Hamas.”

An Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the Group In North America is a document seized by the government that was used in the 2008 United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development case. The verdict found the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development guilty of laundering money to Hamas. According to the Anti-Defamation League, some observers have suggested that this document “identifies a conspiracy by the Muslim Brotherhood to convert the United States to an Islamic nation.”
The memorandum was written in 1991 by Mohamed Akram, a senior Hamas leader in the U.S., a member of the Board of Directors for the Muslim Brotherhood in North America (also known as the Ikhwan) and one of many unindicted co-conspirators in the HLF trial. He asked them to read it for approval as an update and restatement of the plan they had adopted in 1987.
The memorandum was cited by the September 2010 Center for Security Policy (CSP) report, “Shariah: The Threat to America” and endorsed by several members of Congress.