Category World Economic Form

May 17 2020

A Motion was Made to Arrest Bill Gates in the Italian Parliament!


Armstrong Eeconomics Blog/Conspiracy

Re-Posted May 16, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
On the floor of the Italian Parliament, Gates was accused of intentionally looking to reduce the world population by 10-15%. He was said to be advocating genocide worst than what was on trial at Nuremberg. Our greatest problem right now is that ANY politician who refuses to even investigate what is going on NEEDS to be removed from office because they are part of this scheme be it a socialist, climate change or a vaccine dictator who wants to mandate vaccines but has denied your right to sue for any harm including death. This is a legal way people can even kill you with the wrong vaccine and they cannot be prosecuted thanks to politicians in many countries.

You will see in this video from the Italian Parliament that there are politicians who immediately protest and seek to protect Bill Gates. Why? Their hands are in his pockets you can rest assured of that fact. If they have nothing to lose, then let an investigation take place for they have no answers unless they are being paid to have none.

Just investigate and end all the accusations true or false. That is what a Democracy is supposed to do rather than a dictatorship. It is all of our human rights under the UN Charter to demand an investigation.

May 16 2020

Anxiety From Reactions to Covid-19 Will Destroy At Least Seven Times More Years of Life Than Can Be Saved by Lockdowns


By Andrew Glen, Ph.D. and James D. Agresti

May 4, 2020

Medical studies show that excessive stress and anxiety are among the most debilitating and deadly of all health hazards in the world. Beyond their obvious effects like suicide and substance abuse—these mental stressors are strongly related to and may trigger and inflame a host of ailments like high blood pressure, digestive disorders, heart conditions, infectious diseases, cancer, and pregnancy complications.

Based on a broad array of scientific data, Just Facts has computed that the anxiety created by reactions to Covid-19—such as stay-at-home orders, business shutdowns, media exaggerations, and legitimate concerns about the virus—will destroy at least seven times more years of human life than can possibly be saved by lockdowns to control the spread of the disease. This figure is a bare minimum, and the actual one is likely more than 90 times greater.

This study was reviewed by Joseph P. Damore, Jr., M.D., who concluded: “This research is engaging and thoroughly answers the question about the cure being worse than the disease.” Dr. Damore is a certified diplomate with the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, an assistant professor of psychiatry at the Weill Medical College of Cornell University, an assistant attending psychiatrist at New York Presbyterian Hospital, and an adjunct professor in the Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership at the U.S. Military Academy.

Stress and Anxiety Levels

Scientific surveys of U.S. residents have found that the mental health of about one-third to one-half of all adults has been substantially compromised by reactions to the Covid-19 pandemic. Examples include the following:

  • An American Psychiatric Association survey in mid-March found that 36% of adults report that anxiety over Covid-19 “is having a serious impact on their mental health.”
  • A Kaiser Family Foundation survey in late March found that 45% of adults “feel that worry and stress related to” Covid-19 “has had a negative impact on their mental health, an increase from 32% from early March.” Additionally, 19% of adults said it is having a “major impact” on their mental health.
  • A Benenson Strategy Group survey in late March revealed that the Covid-19 “situation has already affected” the “mental health” of 55% of U.S. adults “either a great deal or somewhat.”
  • A Kaiser Family Foundation survey in late April found that 56% of adults “report that worry and stress related to” Covid-19 “is affecting their mental health and wellbeing in various ways,” such as “trouble sleeping, “poor appetite or over-eating,” “frequent headaches or stomachaches,” “difficulty controlling their temper,” “increasing their alcohol or drug use,” and “worsening chronic conditions like diabetes or high blood pressure.”

Contributors to these mental health impacts include but are not limited to:

  • empirically grounded concerns about the virus.
  • anguish over the death of loved ones, although this is limited to a relatively small fraction of the public because the virus has killed one out of every 5,000 Americans, while one out of every 116 Americans die every year.
  • media outlets that overstate the deadliness of Covid-19 by:
  • government stay-at-home orders and self-imposed isolation, as evidenced by:
    • a survey commissioned by the University of Phoenix in late March that found 44% of U.S. adults are more lonely than they have ever been in their lives, which is a risk factor for suicide and many other psychologically driven fatal afflictions.
    • the late-March Kaiser Family Foundation survey, which “found that 47% of those sheltering in place reported negative mental health effects resulting from worry or stress,” a rate that “is significantly higher than the 37% among people who were not sheltering in place.”
    • the late-March Benenson Strategy Group survey, which found that “71% of Americans say they are concerned that ‘social distancing’ measures will have a negative impact on the country’s mental health—including 28% who are extremely or very concerned about this.”
  • government-mandated shutdowns of businesses in nearly every state that have cost millions of jobs and are reflected in the:
    • late-April Kaiser Family Foundation survey, which found that 35% of adults and 55% of workers “have lost their jobs or had a reduction in hours or pay as a result of” responses to Covid-19.
    • mid-March American Psychiatric Association survey, which found that 57% of adults are concerned that responses to the pandemic “will have a serious negative impact on their finances,” and 68% fear it “will have a long-lasting impact on the economy.”

Among all of the figures above, the lowest nationwide measure of people who have incurred psychological harm from reactions to Covid-19 is the 19% of adults in the late-March Kaiser Family Foundation survey who reported a “major impact” on their mental health. This survey included 1,226 respondents and has a margin of sampling error for this result of ± 2.2 percentage points with 95% confidence.

Therefore, at least 16.8% of 255,200,373 adults in the United States—or 42,873,663 people—have suffered major mental harm from responses to Covid-19. This figure forms the first key basis of this study.

The Deadliness of Anxiety and Stress

Medical journals are rich with studies that attempt to measure the lethality of stress, anxiety, depression, and other psychological conditions. Determining this is very difficult because association does not prove causation, and unmeasured factors could be at play.

For example, a 2011 meta-analysis in the journal Social Science & Medicine about mortality, “psychosocial stress,” and job losses finds that “unemployment is associated with a substantially increased risk of death among broad segments of the population,” but there are conflicting theories as to why this is so. One is that “unemployment causes adverse changes in health behaviors, which in turn lead to deterioration of health.” Put simply, unemployment causes bad health. The other theory is that bad health causes unemployment. Both of these theories may be true, and factors that are not measured in the studies could be causing both unemployment and bad health. Thus, it is very difficult to isolate these variables and determine which is causing the others and to what degree.

While trying to address such uncertainty, the meta-analysis examined “235 mortality risk estimates from 42 studies” and found that “unemployment is associated with a 63% higher risk of mortality in studies controlling for covariates.”

Regardless of whether job losses from Covid-19 lockdowns are brief or sustained, the study found that the death correlation “is significant in both the short and long term,” lending “some support to the hypothesis and previous findings that both the stress and the negative lifestyle effects associated with the onset of unemployment tend to persist even after a person has regained a job.”

Also of relevance to current job losses, the study indicates that added unemployment benefits, like those recently passedinto federal law, are unlikely to mitigate the deadliness of job losses. This is because the meta-analysis found that the associations between unemployment and death in Scandinavia and the U.S. are not significantly different, even though the Scandinavian nations offer more generous welfare benefits. Thus, the authors conclude that “these national-level policy differences may not have much of an effect on the rate of mortality following unemployment.”

A broad range of other studies have similar implications for anxiety-related deaths wrought by reactions to Covid-19:

  • A 1991 study published by the New England Journal of Medicine found that “psychological stress was associated in a dose-response manner with an increased risk of acute infectious respiratory illness.” A dose-response relationship, as explained by epidemiologist Sydney Pettygrove, “is one in which increasing levels of exposure are associated with either an increasing or a decreasing risk of the outcome.” She notes that when this pattern occurs, it “is considered strong evidence for a causal relationship between the exposure and the outcome.”
  • A 2004 paper in The Lancet documents that “stress and depression result in an impairment of the immune response and might promote the initiation and progression of some types of cancer….” The paper details many human and animal studies germane to the Covid-19 lockdowns, such as those dealing with a “lack of social interactions” that cause certain cancers to metastasize.
  • A 2005 paper in the Journal of Experimental Medicine finds that “psychological conditions, including stress” trigger a “sophisticated molecular mechanism” that increases “the likelihood of infections, autoimmunity, or cancer.”
  • A 2012 meta-analysis in the British Medical Journal finds “a dose-response association between psychological distress and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and external causes across the full range of distress, even in people who would not usually come to the attention of mental health services.” Furthermore, “these associations remained after adjustment for age, sex, current occupational social class, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and diabetes.” People with the lowest levels of psychological distress in this study had a 20% greater risk of death, and those with the highest levels had a 94% greater risk.
  • A 2012 paper in the Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry analyzes the death rates of more than a million young males in Sweden who underwent a government-mandated military draft physical that “included a structured interview by a psychologist” during 1969 to 1994. This study is particularly relevant to the effects of the current Covid-19 anxiety because it involves nearly all the healthy young men of a nation and excludes those with “severe” mental or physical disorders because they were excused from the exam. The study finds:
    • Young men who were diagnosed with neurotic and adjustment disorders were 76% more likely to die in the average follow-up period of 22.6 years. A neurotic disorder is a problem dealing with anxiety, and an adjustment disorder—which is now called “stress response syndrome”—is “a short-term condition that occurs when a person has great difficulty coping with, or adjusting to, a particular source of stress, such as a major life change, loss, or event.” These are apt descriptions of the tens of millions of Americans who report that reactions to Covid-19 are seriously harming their mental health.
    • Premature deaths associated with mental illness “are not primarily due to suicide or accidents, although risk of both is increased, but to a range of natural causes, particularly cardiovascular disease.” This suggests that the most pervasive harm from lockdowns does not manifest in obvious ways like suicides and overdoses.
  • A 2015 paper in the American Journal of Epidemiology examines the death rates of all “Danes who received a diagnosis of reaction to severe stress or adjustment disorders” between 1995 and 2011. The study found that they “had mortality rates during the study period that were 2.2 times higher than” those of the general population.
  • A 2015 meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry provides a systematic review of 148 studies of death and mental disorders with follow-up times ranging from one to 52 years, with a median of 10 years. It finds that the overall risk of death among people with mental disorders is 2.2 times that of the general population. Breaking these results out by condition, the mortality increases were:
    • 43% for people with anxiety.
    • 71% for people with depression
    • 110% for people with mood disorders.
    • 150% for people with psychoses.

Among all of the results above, the smallest risk of increased death is 20% in the 2012 meta-analysis. This has a margin of error from 13% to 27% with 95% confidence. The lower limit of 13% translates to an average of about 1.3 years of lost life per person.

Corroborating that figure, 22 of the studies in the 2015 meta-analysis included estimates for the average years of life lost by each person with a mental disorder. These “ranged from 1.4 to 32 years, with a median of 10.1 years.” None of these studies were for anxiety, but the low-end figure of 1.4 years provides additional evidence that those who suffer serious mental repercussions from responses to Covid-19 will lose an average of more than a year of life.

Therefore, the figure of 1.3 years of lost life is a bare minimum and forms the second key basis of this study. This varies widely by person and could be:

  • 50 years or more for young people who commit suicide.
  • one month or less for elderly persons who have cardiac events triggered by fear or loneliness.
  • two years for the middle-aged people whose blood pressure begins spiking earlier in life than it would have in the absence of Covid-19-related stress.

Lives Saved By Lockdowns

In the science of epidemiology, or the study of human disease, ethical and practical constraints often make it impossible to conduct experiments that can definitively establish the effects of medical interventions. This applies to determining how many lives might be saved by government lockdowns during the Covid-19 pandemic.

One can easily compare Covid-19 death rates—or the number of people who die from the disease divided by the total population where they live—in nations and states that took different actions. However, many other factors can affect these death rates, such as wealth, age, population density, government, hospital protocols, culture, genetics, diet, and exercise. For example, New York State enacted one of the strictest lockdowns in the U.S. but has 22 times the death rate of Florida, which had one of the mildest lockdowns.

Given such considerations, the highest possible figure for lives saved by lockdowns can be estimated by comparing the nations of Scandinavia. This is because these countries are culturally, economically, and genetically similar to one another but have enacted very dissimilar policies to deal with Covid-19. In the words of Paul W. Franks, professor of genetic epidemiology at Lund University in Sweden:

The Swedish approach to Covid-19 could not be more different from its neighbors, placing much of the responsibility for delaying the spread of the virus and protecting the vulnerable in the hands of the public. It’s now April and, albeit with some restrictions, Swedish bars, restaurants and schools remain open. …
This all contrasts the far more assertive physical restrictions imposed in the culturally similar neighboring countries. Across the borders in Denmark, Norway and Finland, schools closed weeks ago and movement has been severely restricted.

Sweden has taken certain measures to slow the spread of Covid-19, like limiting public gatherings to 50 people. However, these can hardly be characterized as “lockdowns,” and Swedish stores, restaurants, schools, beaches, and other public places are open and bustling.

Stockholm, Sweden on April 1, 2020

Stockholm, Sweden, April 1, 2020 (TT News Agency/Fredrik Sandberg via Reuters)

Comparing the current death rates of Scandinavian nations yields a maximum figure for the lives saved by lockdowns because Sweden’s plan involves more deaths in the early stages of the pandemic but less later on. As detailed by Professor Franks, simulations show that the overall death rate is “expected to be similar across countries,” but “unlike its peers, Sweden is likely to take the hit sooner and over a shorter period, with the majority of deaths occurring within weeks, rather than months.”

As of April 27th, the death rate in Sweden is 32% higher than in the United States, 3.1 times that of Denmark, 5.8 times that of Norway, and 6.4 times that of Finland:

Portion of Population Killed by Covid-19 in Sweden, the U.S., Denmark, Norway, and Finland

Applying the Sweden/Finland death rate ratio of 6.4 to the United States, the maximum number of Americans who could have been saved by past and current lockdowns is 616,590. This figure is based on the most pessimistic projection of 114,228deaths in the U.S. through August 4th by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington. It is calculated by multiplying 114,228 deaths by 6.4 and then subtracting the 114,228 deaths that occur regardless of the lockdown.

The figure of 616,590 lives saved by lockdowns in the U.S. is at the extreme high-end of plausibility because it:

  • uses the worst-case projection for the U.S. death toll.
  • compares the death rate in Sweden to Finland, even though Denmark—which has also implemented a strict lockdown—has twice the death rate of Finland.
  • assumes that Sweden’s death rate doesn’t decline relative to its neighbors over time regardless of Sweden’s strategy to build herd immunity consistent with the following facts:
    • The Imperial College—whose cataclysmic projections of Covid-19 deaths have been a driving force behind government lockdowns—has acknowledged that “the more successful a strategy is at temporary suppression, the larger the later epidemic is predicted to be in the absence of vaccination, due to lesser build-up of herd immunity.”
    • A 2012 paper in the journal PLoS One titled “Immunity in Society” notes that “when a sufficiently high proportion of individuals within a population becomes immune (either through prior exposure or through mass vaccination), community or ‘herd’ immunity emerges, whereby individuals that are poorly immunized are protected by the collective ‘immune firewall’ provided by immunized neighbors.”
    • Large portions of people are highly resistant to Covid-19 and experience no symptoms when they catch it, later making them firewalls against the spread of the disease. For example, the New England Journal of Medicinereported in mid-April that universal Covid-19 testing of pregnant women at two New York City hospitals found that 88% of the women who tested positive for the disease were asymptomatic.
    • U.S. states with strict lockdowns—like New Jersey and New York—have Covid-19 death rates that are three to five times that of Sweden’s:
Portion of Population Killed by Covid-19 as of April 27, 2020 in the U.S. states, England, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland

Nonetheless, this study uses the highly improbable and optimistic scenario of 616,590 lives saved by lockdowns. This figure forms the third key basis of the study.

Comparing Life Lost and Saved

Combining the first two key figures of this study, anxiety from responses to Covid-19 has impacted 42,873,663 adults and will rob them of an average of 1.3 years of life, thus destroying 55.7 million years of life.

Combining the third key figure of this study with data on Covid-19 deaths, a maximum of 616,590 lives might be saved by the current lockdowns, and the disease robs an average of 12 years of life from each of its victims, which means that the current lockdowns can save no more than 7.4 million years of life.

In other words, the anxiety from reactions to Covid-19—such as business shutdowns, stay-at-home orders, media exaggerations, and legitimate concerns about the virus—will extinguish at least seven times more years of life than can possibly be saved by the lockdowns.

Again, all of these figures minimize deaths from anxiety and maximize lives saved by lockdowns. Under the more moderate scenarios documented above, anxiety will destroy more than 90 times the life saved by lockdowns based on:

  • the mid-March American Psychiatric Association survey that found Covid-19 “is having a serious impact” on the “mental health” of 36% of adults.
  • the 2015 meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry that found a 43% average increase in mortality for people with anxiety.
  • the IHME’s midpoint projection of 72,433 Covid-19 deaths through August 4th.
  • the fact that the current death rate of Sweden is 5.1 times the average of the other Scandinavian nations.

Even the figure of 90 times is likely a substantial underestimate of the total life destroyed by reactions to Covid-19 because it doesn’t account for:

  • psychological conditions that are more deadly than anxiety, like depression and mood disorders. Among the 36% who report a “serious impact” on their “mental health,” there is a mix of conditions, and the 2015 meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry finds that the increased risk of death is lowest for anxiety (43%), while it is 71% for depression, and 110% for mood disorders.

Unlike analyses that only compare the number of deaths from Covid-19 to other causes, this study accounts for the years of life lost for each victim. This accords with the CDC’s principle that “the allocation of health resources must consider not only the number of deaths by cause but also by age.” Thus, the CDC explains that the “years of potential life lost” has “become a mainstay in the evaluation of the impact of injuries on public health.” This doesn’t mean that the lives of young people are more important than that of the elderly, but it recognizes and accounts for the facts that:

  • humans cannot ultimately prevent death; they can only delay it.
  • there is a material difference between a malady that kills a 20 year-old in the prime of her life and one that kills a 90-year-old who would have otherwise died a month later.

A possible argument against this study is that it isn’t proper to compare anxiety to Covid-19 because the effects of anxiety often don’t kill until the distant future, while the deaths from Covid-19 are happening right now. Such logic relegates the harms of mental distress to years away, but the facts are clear that it can kill immediately, make life a nightmare in the present, and produce current and lasting physical ailments that end in early death. More importantly, tallying the life lost in any random unit of time, as opposed to an entire lifetime, is shortsighted and exclusionary.

Other distinctions, such as whether or not the cause of death is contagious, are similarly myopic. The primary issues are prevention and harm, and the difference between them ultimately determines how much life is saved or destroyed.

Summary

One of the most important principles of epidemiology is weighing benefits and harms. A failure to do this can make virtually any medical treatment seem helpful or destructive. In the words of Ronald C. Kessler of the Harvard Medical School and healthcare economist Paul E. Greenberg, “medical interventions are appropriate only if their expected benefits clearly exceed the sum of their direct costs and their expected risks.”

Likewise, a 2020 paper about quarantines published in The Lancet states: “Separation from loved ones, the loss of freedom, uncertainty over disease status, and boredom can, on occasion, create dramatic effects. Suicide has been reported, substantial anger generated, and lawsuits brought following the imposition of quarantine in previous outbreaks. The potential benefits of mandatory mass quarantine need to be weighed carefully against the possible psychological costs.”

Yet, when dealing with Covid-19 and other issues, politicians sometimes ignore this essential principle of sound decision-making. For a prime example, NJ Governor Phil Murphy recently insisted that he must maintain a lockdown or “there will be blood on our hands.” What that statement fails to recognize is that lockdowns also kill people via the mechanisms detailed above.

Likewise, a reporter asked NY Governor Andrew Cuomo about the impacts of his lockdown on people who commit “suicide because they can’t pay their bills” and others who die from the economic repercussions and “mental illness.” In reply, Cuomo stated five times that these fatal outcomes are “not death.” He also asked the rhetorical question, “How can the cure be worse than the illness if the illness is potential death?” The obvious answer is that the cure is also potential death.

In situations like pandemics and many other realms of public policy, life-and-death tradeoffs are inevitable, and failing to recognize this can cause tremendous harm. This is the case with Covid-19, where a broad array of scientific facts overwhelmingly shows that anxiety from reactions to the disease will destroy at least seven times more years of life than can possibly be saved by lockdowns. Moreover, the total loss of life from all societal responses to this disease is likely to be more than 90 times greater than prevented by the lockdowns.

A final note for readers who are experiencing anxiety: Healthcare professionals can reduce these effects, so seek help.

Dr. Andrew Glen is a Professor Emeritus of Operations Research from the United States Military Academy. He is a thirty-year U.S. Army veteran and an award-winning researcher in the field of computational probability.

James D. Agresti is the president of Just Facts, a think tank dedicated to publishing rigorously documented facts about public policy issues.

May 16 2020

Huge Protests in Germany Against Government’s Lockdowns


Armstrong Economics Blog/Civil Unrest

Re-Posted May 16, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The German Press is starting to wake up at last after a period of just saying Yes mam! They have run the story that if we acted rationally, we could quickly overcome the consequences of the corona crisis. But politics is deliberately spreading panic among the population and stirring up fear – and in this way causes a severe economic crisis.

For today, the initiative “lateral thinking 711” announced a rally with 500,000 participants in Stuttgart have registered. But there are protests rising in Munich and Berlin. The number of people may reach 1 million.

The government is trying with the aid of most press to label these people as right-wing racists because they cannot address their actions on false forecasts. Meanwhile, unknown persons have set up a replica tombstone in front of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s (CDU) constituency office in Stralsund symbolizing her reign some call of Terror between the refugees and now the virus over-reaction has destroy their lib=vlihoods and their future.

On top of that, the rising resentment against the Eurozone control from Brussels has many wanting to kill the Euro and return to national currencies. I have warned that the cultural divides are far too great and this virus is being used for a total environmental reconstruction of the economy by sheer force. The lack of a transition or any planning whatsoever has cast the livelihoods and future of the world population is tremendous jeopardy and has drastically increased the outcome of our forecasts for not just the collapse of the Euro, but the rise in civil unrest and international war.

Trump has been advised that there is a tremendous risk rising of war. According to sources, the U.S. government is reportedly working to replace all industrial supply chains from China. This is a strategic move in light of rising tensions. But this has already been implemented by the global ban on travel and movement of commerce thanks to the Coronavirus scare worldwide. What Trump will be looking at is replacing those supply chains as they are closed at this moment.

This lockdown over the virus has destroyed the supply chains in so many areas because Gates and crew thought they could just destroy fossil fuels and rebuild without any consideration of how people make transitions for employment. During the Great Depression, it was the Dust Bowl that destroyed agricultural jobs and created the Hobo Movement because people had no income. This time it is Gates and he never considered what he was doing to society – only his Climate Change dream.

Even in the United States, we are witnessing rising civil unrest against UNCONSTITUTIONALlockdowns. This is going to rise as we head into November and the Democratic states, like California, think if they oppress the people hard enough, they will blame Trump.

May 16 2020

Secretary Wilbur Ross Discusses Moving Manufacturing Out of China…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on May 15, 2020 by 

U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross appears with Maria Bartiromo to discuss Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) building an advanced chip factory in Arizona.

Additionally, Wilburine also highlights new moves by the commerce dept. amending its longstanding foreign-produced direct product rule and the Entity List to narrowly and strategically target Huawei’s acquisition of semiconductors that are the direct product of certain U.S. software and technology.

May 15 2020

Protesters Against Coronavirus Restrictions Living in Hostile Territory


Meanwhile, Renee Altakrity’s steadfast belief that “people do have rights”,and that “police are above all our public servants” will outlive the bruises and shock she sustained during her brutal arrest

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 14, 2020

Protesters Against Coronavirus Restrictions Living in Hostile Territory

Australian mother of three Renee Altakrity whose 4-year-old son was ripped out of her arms during what the mainstream and social media describe as an “illegal protest against coronavirus restrictions”, is now caught up in a media maelstrom being branded and smeared as an “anti-vaxxer” by the same media who contend that she and other protesters have no discernible constitutional rights.

‘If you don’t know your rights, you don’t have any. Magna Carta.’

As can be seen in video, the yellow sign she wore around her neck at Saturday’s ‘Exercise My Right’ protest outside New South Wales parliament house had nothing to do with vaccines, having read ‘If you don’t know your rights, you don’t have any. Magna Carta.’

“Some of the days that followed my assault and arrest have been raw, but they’re starting to get better.  The love and support of people the world over keep me and my family going,” the 36-year-old cosmetic nurse told Canada Free Press in a telephone interview last night.

Messages are pouring into her Facebook page, but with Facebook now wiping out thousands of individuals and groups who protest against Coronavirus and its lockdowns, who knows for how long?

Video of police ripping her 4-year-old son Izak from her arms,  which went viral, are heartrending.

The video shows the rough handling of Izak by a policeman

The video shows the rough handling of Izak by a policeman on the scene with the child screaming, “Mommy’s not going” as police worked to hustle her away.

A still traumatized Izak could be heard in the background, shouting “Thank You, Judi! during last night’s telephone interview with his mother.

Bruised and in shock from being dragged away from the protest and literally thrown into the back of a paddy wagon, Renee was detained without water and food for four and a half hours in a police cell, not knowing the whereabouts of her son.

With protesters trying to intervene on his behalf, Izak was interrogated by police for an hour before his father was allowed to take him home.

Videos taken at the scene show that only Renee was set upon and seized by the police.

She was set upon after trying to explain to female officer Genene O’Donnell, how the protesters were within their constitutional rights.

Only the children of left wing protesters are given a pass by the police and media of our day

“Let her go!” was the shout that went up when other protesters realized that she had been isolated and set upon.

Within hours of the protest, Mick Fuller, head of the New South Wales Police accused Izak’s Mom of being “in the driver’s seat” throughout her arrest and was ultimately the one who put her son in danger by bringing him to the protest.

There were other children brought to the ‘Exercise My Right’ protest as there are in protests the world over.

Only the children of left wing protesters are given a pass by the police and media of our day.

“NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller defended the way officers handled her arrest outside NSW Parliament on Sydney’s Macquarie Street on Saturday during an “illegal protest” against lockdown measures amid the pandemic. (YAHOO, May 11, 2020)

“Video of the incident has circulated online and shows Renee Altakrity, 36, resisting arrest while holding on to her four-year-old son as she screams for officers to leave her alone.

“I’ve not committed an offence,” she yells, as other protesters, from a group police say grew to 40 people, try and remonstrate with officers telling them she has a child.”

Renee Altakrity and other citizens protesting against government lockdown measures amid the pandemic, are living in in hostile territory

There is no doubt that Renee Altakrity and other citizens protesting against government lockdown measures amid the pandemic, are living in in hostile territory.

Only yesterday authorities in New Zealand are working on passing legislation that:

“You may have heard that police will be able to enter your house without a warrant if they think you’re violating the government’s Covid-19 rules. The health minister can also designate almost any government employee to enter a business and shut it down if people aren’t following the rules.”

Commissioner Fuller also revealed police in Liverpool are investigating whether Ms Altakrity has breached coronavirus restrictions after allegations she was unlawfully operating her beauty business.  (Yahoo)

 

Katie Hopkins

✔@KTHopkins

The PM has complete power to make new rules;

The police can enter your home or marae without a warrant
Can close your business without notice or reason using an enforcer
Can lock groups down in their homes or elsewhere

LISTEN

Embedded video

1,565

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Renee Altakrity’s steadfast belief that “people do have rights”

Aside from messages of support from people the world over, only retired policeman Wayne Glew, who the Australian mother says has “a wealth of constitutional rights knowledge” has tried to come to her rescue.

Meanwhile, Renee Altakrity’s steadfast belief that “people do have rights”,and that “police are above all our public servants” will outlive the bruises and shock she sustained during her brutal arrest. And the nightmares still traumatizing Izak, teach a sad lesson to little boys everywhere that the police are no longer their friends.

 

 

 

J

May 15 2020

It’s Time to Investigate the Players to Prove the Public Has Been Manipulated for Personal Gain


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption

Posted May 15, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

 

COMMENT: Marty; it seems you write and others do listen. I remember when you posted that China should stop buying bonds from the bankers and inform the Treasury they will only buy directly. The US never did that. They did in about one week. Well your posts on Burr and the chart you posted you know will be evidence in a court that they would need a trader to figure out. They just raided Burr’s house. Hopefully, this will lead to the investigation you keenly are recommending to restore public confidence.

Good on ya!

EK

REPLY: For a warrant to be served on a sitting US senator, this requires approval from the very highest ranks of the Justice Department. This signals that they are stepping up this investigation.

Diane Feinstein has confirmed that she and her husband turned over documents regarding their stock trades ahead of the COVID-19 announcements. No word yet from Pelosi. Pelosi was notorious for such dealings and had refused to answer questions back in 2012.

As I have said, I know PERSONALLY that phone calls were made and elites sold out ahead of the news of a coming “virus” that they did stage a plan of attack just a few months before. Look at Event 201 pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation back on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY.

Bill Gates already has India’s Serum Institute preparing a Gates vaccine for the coronavirus with 60 million doses before it has been approved. Who is paying for that? Probably Gates. Will he make a profit? That is not philanthropy when you get a return — it’s called investment.

I believe EVERY journalist who has been pitching this story should now be compelled to reveal their stock and bonds activity since August 2019. There has been way too much leftist press to ignore if this is a political agenda or one that they also just happened to have profited from. Burr is just the tip of the iceberg!

I believe the WHO waited to declare this a pandemic to ensure friends and family were all divested. It is time to include them in this investigation along with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and everything they are associated with. Tedros Adhanom should now reveal his portfolio after all the damage he has caused around the globe. If he sold out before declaring this a pandemic, that is 20 years in jail. I would say keep the heat on in a cell for him, but heat is often discretionary.

May 13 2020

Bill Gates, HR 6666, Remdesivir, Deaths in Italy


Two vaccines within the space of a few months, one of which has added new viral material and/or a variety of new cellular and genetic debris—plus the usual toxic chemicals—and you have a potential recipe for disaster

Jon Rappoport image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  — NoMoreFakeNews—— Bio and Archives—May 12, 2020

Bill Gates, HR 6666, Remdesivir, Deaths in Italy

Each of these subjects deserves its own article.  Bill Gates would require a library of thick volumes.  I don’t have the time to write separate pieces, since I’m also busy with other research on the fake pandemic.

So I’ll hit the highlights.

Bill Gates’ Death Star

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)BILL GATES:  Here, from FAIR, the long-standing media-watch group, is a September 4, 2016, article, “This Guardian piece touting Bill Gates’ education investment brought to you by Bill Gates.”  It adds a layer of explanation about Gates’ Death Star:

“The Gates Foundation gives grants in the hundreds of thousands and often millions to such media organizations as NBCUniversal, Al Jazeera, BBC, Viacom (CBS) and Participant Media (the producer of pro-charter school documentary Waiting for Superman). Both Gates and the Gates Foundation are sizable shareholders in Comcast, which is the primary investor in Buzzfeed and Vox, as well the parent corporation of MSNBC and NBC News—-the latter of which teamed up with Gates and other noted education experts like Exxon and University of Phoenix Online for the week-long charter school commercial ‘Education Week’.”

“In 2009, the New York Times reported that the Gates Foundation was partnering with media companies to write and shape stories to ‘embed’ messages in primetime dramas:”

“‘It [the Gates Foundation] is less well known as a behind-the-scenes influencer of public attitudes toward these issues by helping to shape story lines and insert messages into popular entertainment like the television shows ER, Law & Order: SVU and Private Practice. The foundation’s messages on HIV prevention, surgical safety AND THE SPREAD OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES have found their way into these shows.” [CAPS are mine]

“His enormous wealth and the reach of media parent corporations seem to exempt Gates from routine disclosure requirements. He was offered up as an education expert in the pro-charter Waiting for Superman, without any mention of the fact that he donated at least $2 million to the film and had a media partnership with its distributor, Viacom. He is given softball interviews in Comcast-backed Vox without disclosure that he’s a major Comcast investor. Because his stake in media companies is laundered enough times, it’s assumed not to merit mention.”

“In the case of the Guardian, Gates effectively owns an entire vertical, so when one of his investments is written up, one doesn’t notice the conflict of interest—-like a fish doesn’t notice water. Because his influence is everywhere, it appears to be nowhere

TRACE: Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone

HR6666: This aptly numbered bill is moving forward in the US House Energy and Commerce Committee.  Titled TRACE, “Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone,” it officially embeds the snitch culture—-with benefits for new agents of the State:

“To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID-19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.”

“The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, may award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID-19, to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals, and to support the quarantine of such contacts…”

HR6666 funds this enterprise to the tune of “$100,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2020; and such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.”

Why don’t they simply advertise: “Have you always wanted to run around like a little fascist, targeting the unwary, the sheep, the outliers, the rebels, the dissenters?  Here’s your chance.  The State will pay you to do it.  Who knows?  Maybe the government will design a uniform for you, embroidered with the logo of a skull or a virus with spikes.”

Fauci’s Promotional Hype Catapults Gilead’s Remdesivir

REMDESIVIR: This is the Fauci COVID drug.  He wants the antiviral to hit the market yesterday.  At the Alliance for Human Research and Protection (ahrp.org), an article points to the fraud:

“Fauci’s Promotional Hype Catapults Gilead’s Remdesivir”: “[On 4/29], Gilead [the manufacturer of remdesivir] issued a press release announcing that it ‘was aware of positive data emerging from [a] National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) study’.”  [Gilead provided assistance on study design and conduct to NIAID.]

“Based on the ‘positive data’ from the NIAID study, the Food and Drug Administration approved emergency use of remdesivir against COVID-19 on May 1.”

“…Dr. Anthony Fauci, who heads the President’s Coronavirus Task Force, and heads the NIAID, since 1984, has a vested interest in remdesivir. He sponsored the [NIAID] clinical trial whose detailed results have not been peer-reviewed. What’s more, [on May 1] HE declared the tenuous results to be ‘highly significant,’ and pronounced remdesivir to be the new ‘standard of care.’”

“Dr. Fauci made the promotional pronouncement while sitting on a couch in the White House, without providing a detailed news release; without a briefing at a medical meeting or in a scientific journal – as is the norm and practice, to allow scientists and researchers to review the data.”

“What Dr. Fauci failed to disclose to the public in his promotional pronouncement was that the [list of] primary outcomes [measures for success or failure] of the [NAID] study [NCT04280705] were changed on April 16, 2020. Changes in the Primary Outcome are posted on Clinical Trials.gov.”

“Changing primary outcomes [measures] after a study has commenced is considered dubious and suspicious.”

“Reuters News reported that highly respected prominent leaders in the medical community – such as Steven Nissen, MD, the chief academic officer at the Cleveland Clinic and Eric Topol, MD, director and founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute in California – were unimpressed by remdesivir’s tentative, modest benefit at best.”

“…the NIAID-Gilead study results have not been published in peer-reviewed literature – nor have details of the findings been disclosed. However, they were publicly promoted by the head of the federal agency that conducted the study, from the White House. What better free advertisement?”

So…take this admittedly toxic drug.  Convincing data?  No need.  Just trust Fauci.  Like other drugs of its type, remdesivir inhibits the machinery of cell-reproduction in the body.

Could a new flu vaccine be partly responsible for the COVID-19 mortality rate in Italy?

DEATHS IN ITALY: I have reported on this con in the past.  Italy’s own National Institute of Health has been combing through the records of patients who have died.  Their average age?  79.5.  And the overwhelming percentage of these people were already suffering from multiple, long-term, serious health conditions—-and had certainly been treated with a number of toxic medical drugs.  Claiming their deaths stemmed from the purported COVID-19 virus would be absurd.

Add to these facts the horrendous air pollution in areas of Northern Italy.  Toxic air can easily explain the lung conditions attributed to the virus.

In recent years, the annual number of flu cases in Italy averages roughly five million.  It’s a simple matter to label some of these people COVID-19.

I’ve also indicated that vaccination campaigns could account for destruction of health in Northern Italy.  I have a few possible clues in that regard.

Colorado Naturopathic Doctor, Michael Murray writes: “Could a new flu vaccine be partly responsible for the COVID-19 mortality rate in Italy?…My colleague, Dr. Alex Vazquez, provided me with a valuable insight. In September 2019, Italy rolled out an entirely new type of influenza vaccine. This vaccine called VIQCC is different than others. Most available influenza vaccines are produced in embryonated chicken eggs. VIQCC, however, is produced from cultured animal cells rather than eggs and has more of a ‘boost’ to the immune system as a result. VIQCC also contains four types of viruses – 2 type A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 type B viruses…”

Well-known Italian writer, Br. Alexis Bugnolo, states: “Italians are still trying to understand why Bergamo, of all the cities of Italy, is the epicenter of the Coronavirus epidemic…”

“One factor may be that the city was vaccinated en mass not once, but twice, in the 2 months preceding the Coronavirus outbreak in the city.”

In the fall [2019], according to records 141,000 doses of vaccine against the winter flu were administered by the local health board. Of those, 129,000 were Italians over 65 years of age. Of those, 129,000, 70% had grave heart problems.”

“Then, again, in December, from the 24th through to January, there was a mass vaccination program against Hepatitis-C of 21,331 citizens of Bergamo. And in the surrounding province, another 12,000 citizens.”

At doctorsinitaly[dot]com: “In September 2019 was made available for the first time in Italy a ‘cell-based’ flu shot, called VIQCC or QIVc, that is produced from cultured animal cells rather than eggs.”

“VIQCC is a quadrivalent flu vaccine that contains 2 type A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 type B viruses. It is approved for people ages 9 and older.”

ANY vaccines given to people whose immune systems are already weakened—-such as the elderly and infirm—-are automatically dangerous and life-threatening at a high level.  Two vaccines within the space of a few months, one of which has added new viral material and/or a variety of new cellular and genetic debris—-plus the usual toxic chemicals—-and you have a potential recipe for disaster.

May 13 2020

Gates & Modi Connection from India


Armstrong Economics Blog/Conspiracy

Re-Posted May 13, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

It has been no secret that Modi of India has been desperately trying to force his nation out of cash and into the world of electronic currency. It has long been assumed that Modi has been a part of Bill Gates’ vision of the future. The left is always the most dangerous because they see themselves as victims.

Narendra Damodardas Modi is proving to be a very dangerous radical who is extremely misguided. His demonetization of the currency of India was carried out without even asking the Reserve Bank. His BJP party advocates social conservatism and a foreign policy centered on nationalist principles. Generally, Modi has focused on a largely neoliberal economic policy prioritizing globalization and economic growth over social welfare. In sum, he is subjugating the people to his goal of globalization.

At the G20 meetings back in 2017, there were discussions behind the curtain about eliminating currency. Governments were beginning their secret agenda adapting to a new banking system by September 2017 that would provide instant transfers in order to support an electronic currency. You can go to a store, pay for something, but the money does not show up for three days. That had to change in order to make the digital currency viable.

Modi has been pushing India against the wall to move into this new world of electronic money, and his ideal target was to join was 2020 based upon sources. They have been using this virus to tell people it can live on paper money for 17 days, so you will risk instant death by accepting paper money. Modi was not doing this in isolation. He has been fully on board with the Gates agenda. Modi’s cancellation of paper money set in motion a panic conversion to paper dollars.

The primary reason they are all conspiring to overthrow Trump is that he stands in their way. The Democrats put into the virus relief bill their version of a digital dollar. Trump removed it. These people determined to change the old-world order feel they MUST overthrow Trump. Meanwhile, the demand for gold in India and China has declined thanks to the coronavirus. Modi has used the virus to cut off imports, using the global lockdown as the excuse.

 

 

Melinda Gates has been pushing digital currency and she has been addressing the G7 on the claim that this will empower women. She told the G7 that eliminating paper money and moving to 100% digital currencies will somehow strangely empower women who otherwise are suppressed by paper money. I can’t even understand that logic. But she has also been spearheading that women are oppressed because they have children. So she is on to the entire theory of depopulation for climate change.

 

Now comes Modi’s second part of the Gates conspiracy. India’s Serum Institute is already preparing a Gates vaccine for the coronavirus, which is under trial in Britain but is totally unproven. So much for Gates’ 18 months. They are making 60 million doses of his vaccine he claims will take 18 months to develop. Why lie? Gate’s vaccine is already in preparation and they believe they will skew the polls and do whatever needs to be done to overthrow Trump and then the Democrats will make the vaccine MANDATORY to work. This is just part of the agenda. What is so important about this vaccine? That is the real question.

The Serum Institute makes more vaccines than any other manufacturer and delivers them to 140 countries around the world. How can they begin looking at creating a vaccine that is not yet proven? Serum AMR was granted a license to Aridis’ clinical-stage programs AR-301 (ventilator-associated pneumonia) in September 2019, which is interestingly related to the coronavirus which causes pneumonia.

Serum Institute was quoted by Reuters: “’A majority of the vaccine, at least initially, would have to go to our countrymen before it goes abroad,’ Poonawalla said, adding that Serum would leave it to the Indian government to decide which countries would get how much of the vaccine and when.” Modi will control the vaccine. This is a very interesting conspiracy.

Nanotechnology-based vaccine delivery systems have been developed to enhance the immunogenicity of a vaccine antigen by modulating antigen delivery to the immune cells. Nanocarrier formulations of vaccines offer the advantages of co-delivery of antigen and immunomodulatory. But what does Gates want to covertly inject into our systems? ID2020? Is this the Minority Report 1984 vision where they know who we are but not with eye scans?

Bill Gates clearly has a whole other agenda that he is not disclosing for a man who thinks the world is overpopulated. It just makes no sense that you would want to vaccinate people to increase the world population. In an interview with Financial Times earlier this month, Gates called the coronavirus pandemic “the biggest event” most people will experience in their lifetimes. Gates also warned that a viral outbreak on this scale could occur “every 20 years or so.” Diseases have historically always thinned the herd. That is just part of the cycle. Why would he try to stop that process if he fears the world is overpopulated? Something is just not right!

Gates is the person who has manipulated this virus into the global headlines, and funded fake studies to justify a global lockdown (Ferguson). I have reviewed his code. It is a complete joke. It is incapable of forecasting anything as a stochastic. Gates will use this to forecast on 1% death rates from his vaccine (700,000 people to die), but what if his models are wrong again and 5% or more die? Will that satisfy his agenda? He clearly states immunity from his vaccine so he cannot be prosecuted (pay attention to the interview). He will just get to say – Sorry! Oops!

Despite all the data that show far fewer people have died of this virus than the flu, it is the biggest event of their life because he has destroyed the world economy to create a New Green World Order.

Nobody knows what really lurks in the mind of Bill Gates. For someone who claims we must get to zero CO2 and professes to be a climate change supporter, he did buy a fully electric Porsche. However, he also has a Porsche 959 which many say is the most impressive car to come out of the German automaker and possibly the greatest car ever. Hm. Not exactly something a Climate Change disciple would drive.

Being a sports car buff myself, for those who are unaware, an electric car is the FASTEST off the line – PERIOD! I bought a BMW i8, which is a hybrid. It is super fast and a lot of fun. So while you can appear to be in favor of the climate, you do not have to give up the thrill. They are just as quiet as a mouse.

May 13 2020

It’s Not All Bad


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics

Re-Posted May 13, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: Hello Martin,

My wife and I had to visit a small village near where we live today, as we needed to buy something from the pharmacist. When we arrived at the door of the pharmacist, it was locked so I knocked. About 30 seconds later a young female employee came opened the door and in an authoritarian voice said “move back 2 metres!” To be honest I was shocked at her attitude; customer service was in the negative. Anyway, I continued, “excuse me but you are being very rude and to be honest you’re a little frightening.” She raised her voice stating the rules.

Actually, I was a little embarrassed at my reaction, as she triggered me and I was not as calm as I normally am. The thing is, I did feel somewhat anxious, but not with her, but the fact that if she had called the police, I would have been the one in trouble. Under normal circumstances if an employee was rude I would have made a complaint to a superior, but at the moment, that seems not to be an option and from what I have noticed many other employees in supermarkets etc appear to be enjoying this new sense of power especially the younger ones.

It is very worrying how a population can so easily be ‘changed’ through peer pressure and the accompanying fear. I could never really understand how the people of Germany got behind fascism, but I now realise first-hand how the rot can set in, just by convincing people that they are doing it for the greater good – the NHS, the vulnerable.

It’s a strange world at the moment. If I speak out or question the rules that have been imposed I feel that I am the strange one, the ‘normal’ thing to do is fall in line and don’t question.

I am not sure how this will all end. I know you have mentioned that the week beginning 18th May is a critical point as far as protests go, but the last thing we need I think is violence; that may just make things much worse, so hopefully it won’t come to that.

It’s not all bad Martin, I do have some good experiences when visiting some retailers, they are generally friendly and helpful!

Thank you your giving me some clarity through these confusing times.

S (Germany)

REPLY: It is not all bad. When I go out here in Florida, maybe 60% have masks. Just no point talking to them and they seem not interested in even saying hello. The rest seem as normal. They still have their tape on the floor for social distancing and Plexiglas panels between you and the cashier. I think it all depends on the culture of the area where you live. We really cannot make wholesale assumptions.

Nevertheless, we are crossing the Rubicon here. There are people just fed up with this nonsense. I really do not know how you explain destroying an economy, all tourism in a place like Thailand with a population of 69 million and only 56 deaths attributed to COVID-19.

I know they will claim that because of the lockdown the death toll is minimal. They will use that as the excuse going into the election. It is just that people have lost everything and as they see jobs do not come back, and unemployment remains high, the anger will rise. I really do not think you can blame them for they will see they have been played for stupid fools. The press will support the lockdown. Quite frankly, this is not a time to work for such left-wing newspapers. Napoleon shut down existing German newspapers when he marched through, replacing them with his own as he conquered nations. The press has often become the target in revolutions when they pitch against the people.

It is just time – We will begin to see an increasing trend of protests globally. Unfortunately, the left has always used force to impose their philosophy upon others. It has been 8.6 weeks from the start of this madness. This is when the game begins to shift.

May 12 2020

This Post Contains U Tube Videos on Bill Gates and his Handmaiden Dr. Anthony Fauci that have a Plan to Reduce the Word’s Population Some of which have been banned and/or taken down!


Bill Gates was a ruthless businessman and used any means legal or not to achieve his goal. Ho he accomplished that is not the story here but the bottom line was after he retired he created a 501(c)(3)  Foundation, The Bill & Melisa Gates Foundation twenty years ago in 2000. The stated goal was the created an illusion that this foundation was created to help the poor and  destitute of the world, nothing could be further from the truth. The foundation started off with $46.8 billion  and Gates started giving large grants to implement his stated goals.No one knows exactly how much money Gates gave away but it was, without doubt, tens of billions of dollars over the past 20 years. Gates made sure the world knew what he was doing through his extensive publicity efforts. However strangely the latest financial records of the foundation indicates that it’s assets are probably worth over $100 billion today. So it would seem that Gates was doing more than giving away grant money. So what was his real purpose of this foundation.

 

Initially his focus seemed to be on Climate change And how it was imperative that we stop using carbon based fuels that were creating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and that was casuing the temperature of the planet to increase and that that increasing temperature would in the near future destroy civilization itself.  Gates was not lone in this believe as Al Gore the former President Clinton VP was also on board with this idea. I became aware of this is a famous TED talk where Gates indicated that that to get to zero emissions of Carbon Dioxide production my humans would have to go to zero. Later it became obvious that this college drop out was not educated as he was being influence by those that followed the dis bunked theory of Tomas Malthus found in his 1798 book An Essay on the Principle of Population, Which basically stated the the growth of the population would out strip the ability to feed it and that would create famine and war. 222 years later, today, we know that was not true.  But Gates apparently does think it is true and it seems that his REAL GOAL is to significantly reduce the worlds population.

The following bits of videos will show that Gate and Fauci (a hired hand of Gates) probably created this COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan China and hid its release in China and the World Health organization until it had spread world wide. This two both need to be tried for Crimes Against Humanity. or example from a NIH 2005 study, that found that “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” Fauci has been rejecting the use of this and has been preaching the Gates vaccine solution. The report stated:

“We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

Conclusion

Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.”

Error
This video doesn’t exist