Mar 28 2024

FDA Clears Ivermectin and Backtracks on COVID-Era Propoganda

Posted originally on Mar 28, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

We all recall the FDA and mainstream media gaslighting the public into believing there was no available treatment for the coronavirus. They laughed at those who believed in holistic methods or the parasite treatment Ivermectin. Social media platforms were strongarmed by the government to remove any post related to Ivermectin treatment, commentators who discussed successful treatment with Ivermectin were silences, and the FDA launched its own campaign to dispel “misinformation” that they are now admitting was true all along.

The FDA even posted a picture of a horse online, taunting COVID-deniers by saying they were taking a medication only intended for horses and livestock. “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” the FDA posted on social media platforms in August 2021. “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19,” another post read in April 2022.

“Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous,” FDA said a few years ago.

Yet, 101 separate studies on Ivermectin treatments for the coronavirus have shown that it is an effective treatment. Some sources even say that it has a 62% chance of reducing symptoms if taken early. Worse, the FDA approved ivermectin for human consumption back in 1996.

🚨BREAKING:
FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.

This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the… pic.twitter.com/HWYkkZLpoJ
— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) March 22, 2024

A group of doctors, who would have lost their careers for speaking out a few years ago, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for blocking this effective treatment, which likely resulted in countless preventable deaths. “We’re suing the FDA for lying to the public about ivermectin,” said Dr. Mary Bowden, supported by Drs. Paul E. Marik and Robert L. Apter.

The FDA is now agreeing to remove all social media posts denying the effectiveness of ivermectin. Lawyers for the corrupt government agency deny that the FDA made any recommendations. “They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19. They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin.”

Now, Dr. Bowden was forced to resign during the COVID-19 fiasco for speaking out against mRNA vaccines and pleading with the public that alternative treatments were available. She claimed that she successfully treated hundreds of patients, often with co-morbidities, and none were forced into hospitalization. Her work went directly against the narrative that the only way to “stop the spread” was to take the experimental vaccine, stay home, or wind up on a ventilator.

Simply removing social media posts does not seem like a sufficient sentence for what the government did. Their “misinformation” caused people to lose their livelihoods and, worse, caused unnecessary deaths. The FDA had known since at least 2015 that ivermectin was safe for human consumption, but they dismissed it as a veterinarian medication throughout the pandemic and promoted dangerous propaganda.

Mar 25 2024

FDA Study: COVID Vaccine Increases Risk of Stroke Among Elderly

Posted originally on Mar 25, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

The elderly were told to take the COVID vaccination as they were high-risk. Countless advertisements flooded our screens and airwaves for years, urging the most vulnerable to get the COVID-19 vaccine, boosters, and any other vaccination to prevent infection. Instead, people are experiencing ailments far worse than the coronavirus.

We know that the vaccine was released under Operation Warp Speed, and as the name entails, there were no protocols or proper testing. Years later, we are seeing the short-term side effects and the long-term effects remain unknown. Researchers at the government’s own U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) admitted that they found a correlation between the mRNA jab and the risk of stroke after analyzing Medicare data of 11,001 individuals. (Read: Stroke Risk After COVID-19 Bivalent Vaccination Among US Older Adults)

There is an elevated risk of nonhemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack in individuals over 85 who received the Pfizer vaccination, and that age range is lowered to 65 to 74 among those who received Moderna’s cocktail. “This finding suggests that the observed association between vaccination and stroke in the concomitant subgroup was likely driven by a high-dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccination,” Steven Anderson, director of the Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology at the FDA, and the other researchers wrote.

The FDA believes those who received the common flu vaccine along with the COVID-19 vaccine are particularly at risk. As usual, they say more testing is necessary to determine the root cause, but they first alerted the public of this risk in January 2023, and nothing has been done. The risk of a stroke appeared more prevalent 43 to 90 days after vaccination. The majority of those who experienced a stroke post-vaccination have no previous history of having had a stroke.

2022_12_06_09_27_52_Vaccinated_Majority_of_COVID_19_Deaths_CDC_Data

Tragically, people can no longer trust public health agencies run by the government, and even vaccines that were previously trusted will likely be shunned. The COVID-19 vaccine DOES NOT prevent transmission or infection. Only the pharmaceutical companies know what is in the vaccine as they refuse to reveal that information to the public, and the government has granted them immunity from any wrongdoing. Why are people still receiving the vaccination when we know of the ailments it causes and none of the benefits?

Mar 25 2024

She Will Bail – Senator Lisa Murkowski Again Threatens to Leave the Republican Party

Posted originally on the CTH on March 24, 2024 | Sundance

It’s really not a matter of if Republican senators will leave the party in the lame duck session after a President Trump win in November; the question is: how many?

The predictability of the issue is actually quite simple. {GO DEEP} Almost all senators kneel at the altar of money, nothing else. The GOPe senators will exhaust every weapon in their arsenal on behalf of their multinational financial benefactors, prior to the November 2024 election. Once those narrative attack weapons are exhausted, they will take the deal and quit the party in their final political effort to retain affluence.

Accepting this reality, I asked the question a few weeks ago. The largest number of respondents said 1 to 3 senators will resign the party.

[Source]

Lisa Murkowski switching parties is a no brainer. Susan Collins and Todd Young are two more possibilities. Mitt Romney has already announced he is leaving. Mitch McConnell has already announced he is stepping down from leadership and will not seek another term. A tenuous John Thune will only remain if he replaces McConnell. …. and so it goes.

I would bet on THREE Republican senators who will switch parties, but it could easily be more.

One thing is certain, those who do not switch/exit will remain as DeceptiCons and oppose: (a) any effort to confront the intelligence community they support; and (b) all Trump nominations, foreign or domestic policy, that threaten their place at the trough.

(Via CNN) – […] “I wish that as Republicans, we had … a nominee that I could get behind,” Murkowski told CNN. “I certainly can’t get behind Donald Trump.”

The party’s shift toward Trump has caused Murkowski to consider her future within the GOP. In the interview, she would not say if she would remain a Republican.

Asked if she would become an independent, Murkowski said: “Oh, I think I’m very independent minded.” And she added: “I just regret that our party is seemingly becoming a party of Donald Trump.”

Pressed on if that meant she might become an independent, Murkowski said: “I am navigating my way through some very interesting political times. Let’s just leave it at that.”

Murkowski hasn’t always been on the outs within her party. Appointed in 2002 by her father, Gov. Frank Murkowski, the senator’s politics were in line with the president at the time – George W. Bush – as she maintained a tight relationship with the senior GOP senator from her state, Ted Stevens, who helped build Alaska through federal dollars he funneled back home. (read more)

Mar 17 2024

A Compelling Outline by Dr David Martin Discussing SARS-CoV-2

Posted originally on the CTH on March 16, 2024 | Sundance

I am not familiar enough with the exhaustive research available by those who spent thousands of hours researching the background of SARS-CoV-2 origination. I spent most of my research time looking at the higher altitude of the insane government narrative. However, that said, a lengthy presentation was shared with me that seemingly makes a lot of sense.

Dr David Martin has an extensive video outline drawing attention to the origination of SARS-CoV-2, the deep weed mechanics of who, what, when, where and how the COVID-19 virus was originated, and he presents a compelling narrative. The key issue discussed goes beyond the SARS-CoV-2 origination, and into the vaccine component which includes a larger discussion on conditioned human behavior. That’s the part where I was focused.

The casual presentation is in two segments below. They are worth the time as Dr Martin presents a compelling picture of the construct in the pandemic push. As I look at the controlling outcome that stemmed from government, I find my current research reference of the global cleaving somewhat backstopped by how the various national governments responded with their vaccine compliance systems. WATCH:

The Great Setup With Dr. David Martin Full Part 1

My current research journey for the past two years, encompasses govt control as the larger picture. This need to control information seems to surface everywhere, including which candidates can be permitted to run for the office of the presidency.

By now you likely understand the story of the Western Sanctions against Russia and the overwhelming evidence of their futility. Something else was the impetus for the most domineering global financial fracture in world history. Something else, something totally disconnected from Russia, was/is the driving element.

In the big picture we see one massive war to control human behavior with multiple fronts.

Right now, the battle of greatest impact is taking place around “information.” The Western Governmental system, mostly visible by the various Intelligence Communities, has deployed all their weapons into a massive effort to control information. The TikTok ban is one small part of the much larger fight to control information. When you start to ask what type of information would generate such a massive Western response, perhaps you start to ask the right question.

Here’s part two of the Dr. David Martin discussion.

The Great Setup With Dr. David Martin Full Part 2

The demand for vaccine compliance was the largest multi-governmental push in our lifetime. Nothing is even close to second place.

Did this structured system of compliance generate additional benefits that are now materializing in their “information control” effort? Did the silencing of vaccine compliance dissent provide some useful background information that can be deployed now? Was the targeting of COVID-19 dissent a precursor to a larger information war that is now underway? I would answer yes to each of these questions.

One thing is certain, the specific traits of psychological abuse were present in the government SARS-CoV-19 response as it pertained to compliance.