Having taken an oath to defend the Constitution and who refuse to protect it from all attempts to destroy its meaning, are not declared to be working toward overthrowing the country, and placed under arrest
There are laws for everything, enough to fill volumes. Yet, lawless politicians ignore the laws that do not suit their plans of the moment and mentally create new temporary laws to support their needs. Laws like those are applied in rogue states, controlled by members of their progressive, socialist party. The new laws consider the existing legal laws irrelevant.
There are laws covering speed limits, there are others against “J walking,” climbing up the outside of public buildings, and I’m sure hundreds that I’ve never heard of, and all of those mentioned and many not mentioned, were put in place as public safety policies, so that no harm might come to the public.
There are Federal obligations that mandate the safety of all citizens so that they may prosper and enjoy freedom and the pursuit of happiness. The new progressive Socialist party develops their imaginary laws in order to control the citizenry. Laws that supposedly protect minority groups from “white supremacy” which they dub racist, homophobic, bigoted; basically everyone who is not in a minority category. In order to supposedly protect minorities, these politicians, both federal and local, allow hordes of “peaceful” protesters to march into cities at night in areas of minority housing and businesses, while they keep the police at bay, and the “protesters” burn and loot those businesses, destroying decades of hard work. Minority-owned businesses changed the lives of the owners and brought work to the area and an improvement in the lives of residents and families, creating an upward trending lifestyle.
Pushed into poverty again, the elite progressives maintain control.
In spite of all the laws for the protection of the citizenry, rogue states declare themselves sanctuaries that harbor gangs of murderers, and anarchists who burn and loot cities, occupy public places as their own regardless of the citizens within those places put in jeopardy of the loss of life, goods, personal property and certainly the pursuit of happiness, as well as freedom to come and go as they please. Since the right to these things are all tenets of the Constitution of the United States of America, how is it that these states are not charged with rejection of the union, not only for putting U. S. citizen in danger but also thwarting the laws of the nation, preventing the sworn protection of all those invited or born to it to live under its protection.
How are these states and cities that do these things at the peril of Americans not guilty of attempting to overthrow our country from within? How is it that anyone employed by the government, having taken an oath to defend the Constitution and who refuse to pass laws that protect it from all attempts to destroy its meaning, are not declared to be working toward overthrowing the country, and placed under arrest without the benefits and rights of the position they held, while they languish in jail?
Legitimate peaceful protesters need to gather in front of the capitol with letters of request that the Attorney General of the United states convene a Grand Jury to look into these matters and begin the process of taking the rogue politicians, both federal and local into custody to determine how failure of keeping their oaths, laws, and their deceitful actions constitute crimes against the country and its citizens. They literally are aiding and abetting the criminal elements that are laying the anarchist groundwork on behalf of those who pay them those who determine which lives matter as opposed to our country’s belief that all lives matter solidified by the wars we have gotten involved in on behalf of the citizens of foreign countries who were becoming victims of governments with the same beliefs as the American socialist progressives.
On August 23, a combative black suspect named Jason Blake was shot by a Kenosha, Wisconsin police officer who thought Blake might be reaching into his SUV to retrieve a deadly weapon. In a shameful rush to judgment by a national media that salivates when unarmed black people are shot by white police, the incident was portrayed as an outrage where another unarmed black man was shot just for the hell of it by a rogue white cop in this “systemically racist” nation of ours. Was the shooting of Blake justifiable? The legal system has yet to answer that question. But as shown in the video below, determining the answer is not as easy as you might think.
What cops face every time they put on the uniform
Self-produced by a man obviously familiar with defensive firearms training, the homemade video explains why police officers sometimes shoot suspects who turn out to have been unarmed. This eye-opening presentation refers to the “OODA Loop.” OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) is an information processing tool used to train law enforcement officers to make faster and better decisions that not only help reduce the number of unwarranted police shootings of unarmed suspects, but also reduce an officer’s chance of getting killed due to a delayed response to a potentially lethal threat.
Because the video is homemade, watching it requires a bit more concentration than if it had been professionally produced. It may be helpful to watch it twice, but understanding its message will forever change your thinking about police shootings of unarmed suspects.
How do Police make shooting decisions?
Policing is one of the most difficult jobs in America. And thanks to race-baiting politics, it is also one of the most thankless. Every day and every night, law enforcement officers have to make life and death decisions in the blink of an eye, decisions that can determine whether their family ever sees them again.
“Random Stop” is an award-winning reenactment of the 1998 execution shooting of a Laurens County, Georgia sheriff’s deputy who hesitated when threatened by a mentally deranged man he’d pulled over for reckless driving. The recreation is based on actual dash cam footage that documented the initial part of the encounter in real time. Since the murder occurred at the rear of the officer’s patrol car and therefore was not recorded on dash cam, a recreation was made to convey the unimaginable terror the rookie officer experienced as he was executed in cold blood after begging in vain for mercy. Click here to view this intensely realistic depiction of the last moments of Deputy Kyle Dinkheller’s life, and then click here to see another chilling example of the kind of danger cops face every time they put on the uniform.
Cops: Our society’s domestic sheepdogs
In the movie “American Sniper,” Bradley Cooper told the story of the sheep, the wolves and the sheepdogs:
There are three types of people in this world: sheep, wolves and sheepdogs. Some people prefer to believe that evil doesn’t exist, and if it ever darkened their doorstep, they wouldn’t know how to protect themselves. These are the sheep. Then you’ve got predators who use violence to prey on the weak. They’re the wolves. And then there are those blessed with the gift of aggression, an overpowering need to protect the flock. These are the rare breed who live to confront the wolf. They are the sheepdogs.
Abroad, the military is our country’s sheepdog; here at home, the law enforcement community is. God bless them all.
There are a lot of people who object to politicizing sports games or Broadway plays. Here, this call for national equality when both teams locked arms invoked a lot of booing. I for one found it offensive when they stopped the Broadway play “Hamilton” to criticize Vice President Pence who was there in the audience. When people pay for such entertainment, they should not be subjected to the political ideas of those being paid for entertainment.
‘President Pelosi’s’ stiletto looks ready to come flying at American heads. The only way to dodge it is for people to put aside their fear of the pandemic and to get out to vote IN PERSON
In the Democrat-led shark-feeding frenzy of the 2020 Election Campaign, lock down masses worriedly wait for the next shocking shoe to drop.
Outrageous, over-the-top smears against President Donald Trump did not peak with The Atlantic’s anonymous-sourced story that the president called dead soldiers “losers” and “suckers”. With the Democrat and media gang-up in desperado mode, there will be much, much more to come.
‘President Pelosi’s’ loathsome stiletto
The shoe that so many are waiting to be dropped will be a stiletto—‘President Pelosi’s’ loathsome stiletto.
While cognitive-challenged Democrat presidential frontrunner Joe Biden’s gaffes get worse by day—even when he’s reading answers from his Teleprompter, the Democrats remain impervious to his gaffes and goofs.
Why?
Devious Democrat Elites went into the 2020 presidential race knowing they could easily replace Biden—if he wins.
Not with vice president candidate Kamala Harris but with House Speaker Pelosi by default.
Here’s the step-by-step strategy the Democrats will spin into a workable reality:
President Trump WILL win on Election Night—but Democrats, using the Mail-In Vote and other measures will claim a recount is necessary.
They will make the recount last until Inauguration Day when they will take full advantage of a law that allows House Speakers to serve as temporary presidents until vote recounts can be released.
January 20, 2021 will be the day when Pelosi’s stiletto will come flying, full speed, at America’s head.
Standing in line to vote
When President Trump raised the possibility of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi succeeding him as the next president of the United States, during a speech to the 2020 Council for National Policy, the media said he was only kidding.
Said Trump: “I really don’t think that you are going to know anything on the evening — anything meaningful or anything real — on the evening of Nov. 3rd. You are not going to know what happened. I don’t think you’ll know two weeks later. I don’t think you’ll know four weeks later. And I don’t know what is going to happen. You know, there is a theory that if you don’t have it by the end of the year, crazy Nancy Pelosi would become president. You know that, right?” (The Hill, Sept 12,2020)
“To be sure, Trump likely was having a bit of fun while trying to fire up conservative attendees at the event. That said, he also raised the “theory” because of the perfect storm brewing for a delay in voting results and potential voter fraud. The two main reasons are that some people may not feel comfortable voting in person because of concern about COVID-19 and the more than 51 million mail-in ballots being sent out in nine states and Washington, D.C.
“Of course, in the middle of the pandemic, we can stand in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles, the post office, the supermarket, restaurants, big-box stores such as Lowe’s and Home Depot, and other retailers and locations, but some Americans apparently believe the virus might be more contagious in the line leading to voting booths. Maybe those who believe this don’t know we had in-person voting during other crises, including flu pandemics and the years encompassing World War I and World War II.
Have democratic American elections come down to Democrats like Pelosi knowing “every rule and TRICK in the book in order to steal the vote?!
“Those realities aside, should problematic voting scenarios take hold in any large measure, it could be days or even weeks indeed before we know who won this presidential election. And if those weeks were to stretch to noon on Jan. 20, 2021, without the Electoral College declaring a winner, some constitutional scholars believe the presidency would default to the Speaker of the House. Assuming the Democrats retain control of the House, that new president most likely would be Pelosi.
“Were that to come to pass, most Democrats and liberals would scream with joy at the opportunity given to them, while Republicans and conservatives would be shocked into depression and dread.”
But what about the millions who voted to re-elect President Donald Trump?
Where will that cruelly leave them?
…”Academic exercise or not, Republicans, conservatives and the Trump White House underestimate Pelosi at their own risk. She has proved to be an effective and popular leader for her Democratic colleagues. More than that, she knows every rule and trick in the book. (The Hill)
Have democratic American elections come down to Democrats like Pelosi knowing “every rule and TRICK in the book in order to steal the vote?!
God spare America from Pelosi’s stiletto and God Bless America!
“That means President Pelosi would know that she’d need to act fast to get anything done in the White House. Prior to ascending to the presidency, Pelosi would have kept a close eye on the confusion and delayed vote certification. The more confusion and delay, the better her chances to be named president. She would have convened her senior leadership and most trusted advisers to come up with a one-day plan, a one-week plan and a one-month plan for her “presidency.” (The Hill)
“Any president can do a great deal of good, or initiate a great deal of partisan mischief, in a short time — especially if a game plan is mapped out weeks before the inauguration.
“In the increasingly surreal year that has been 2020, will the theory of a President Pelosi translate into a history-making first?
“Prior to the economic devastation from extended pandemic-related lockdowns and the anarchy, violence and looting happening in many cities, there may have been a slight chance for the House Speaker to take over in the Oval Office because of a close vote and difficult count.”
If Democrat mayors and governors already succeeded at cowing millions by making them wear face masks and shutting down healthy businesses, why wouldn’t they plan on installing Pelosi as America’s next president?
Meanwhile, ‘President Pelosi’s’ stiletto looks ready to come flying at American heads.
The only way to dodge it is for people to put aside their fear of the pandemic and to get out to vote IN PERSON.
God spare America from Pelosi’s stiletto and God Bless America!
The NFL took a major hit in their ratings for opening week. Rating were down 16% with many fans tuning out the social justice lectures from virtue signaling millionaire players.
We have not watched a minute of the NFL and don’t plan on watching these over paid ingrates raising their fists in the air and kneeling during the anthem.
Look like it is true that the left wants to ruin everything, including pro-sports.
The legacy of convicted sexual predator Harvey Weinstein and the late Jeff Epstein live on over at Netflix—where the Tween Twerking drama Cutie is the latest A Star Is Born release in nauseating, streamed living color.
The film, generating controversy for its dance sequence showing underage girls gyrating provocatively and touching themselves sexually, is proof that filth is more contagious than any virus.
“The scene prompted the hashtag #CancelNetflix to reach the No. 1 trending item on Twitter Thursday. An online petition calling for customers to cancel their Netflix subscriptions has reached more than 600,000 signatures. (Breitbart, Sept. 11, 2020)
Before landing their multi-million dollar production deal at Netflix, Barack and Michelle Obama learned the ropes about movie making from their daughter, Malia, who worked for Weinstein in New York in 2017.
How do we know that the Obamas go along with the Netflix git-along-release of Cutie?
“Barack and Michelle Obama, who have a production deal with Netflix, have so far remained silent about the Cuties controversy, as has former Obama national security advisor Susan Rice, who sits on Netflix’s board of directors.” (Breitbart, Sept. 11, 2020)
Epically ironic that while her husband was in the Oval Office, Michell Obama took credit for the initiative, ‘Let Girls Learn’ that promoted education for girls.
“She’s said in the past that she put the Let Girls Learn initiative together in part because she was disturbed by the story of kidnapped schoolgirls” (BBC, April 14, 2016)
“In her speech, though, she mentioned them only briefly.”
“Members of a militant organisation, Boko Haram, kidnapped 276 girls from a school in Chibok, Nigeria, on 14 April 2014.
“Afterwards Michelle Obama posted an image of herself on social media, posing with a white sheet of paper that said: “#BringBackOurGirls”.
“The hashtag campaign, designed to bring attention to the kidnappings, had already reached 1 million tweets by the time Obama joined, but her statement still made a splash. She gave a public address several days later, talking about the kidnappings.
“She said her husband was directing the US government do everything possible to help Nigerians bring the girls back.
…”On Wednesday, nearly two years after the abductions, Obama spoke about the girls during an event about education at the World Bank in Washington.
“Before Obama appeared at the podium, the World Bank’s president, Jim Yong Kim, announced that the bank group was investing $2.5b (£1.76b) in girls’ education projects around the world.
“Then Obama spoke about her initiative, Let Girls Learn, that promotes education for girls.
“She’s said in the past that she put the Let Girls Learn initiative together in part because she was disturbed by the story of the kidnapped schoolgirls.
“In her speech, though, she mentioned them only briefly.
“Why, two years ago, would terrorists be so threatened by the prospect of girls going to school that they would break into a dormitory in the middle of the night?” she said, describing the crime.
“Beyond that she didn’t say much about the girls – and didn’t talk about their fate, either.
“Fifty-seven of the girls escaped from Boko Haram. The rest are still missing, with little hope of returning to their previous lives.
“Obama once described it as an “unconscionable act”. Like people around the world, she was outraged.
“Yet the US effort – and impact – was minimal. Obama said Americans would help the Nigerians.
“With that goal in mind, the US sent several dozen Air Force personnel to the region to use drones to help find the girls, reported the New York Times.
“In addition a couple dozen Americans gave advice to Nigerian officials who were trying to save them.
“At one point authorities found them. But as Andrew Pocock, who served as British high commissioner to Nigeria, explained in the Sunday Times, they didn’t rescue them.
People could have been killed – possibly even the girls themselves.
“She said: “These girls are our girls – every last one of them.” She described children around the world as “our responsibility”.
“She stood in a foyer with a glass ceiling thirteen stories above her showcasing a turquoise-blue sky. Natural light flooded the building, reflecting off floor tiles.Economists, development experts, and gender-violence researchers cheered as she spoke. They were part of a global do-gooder scene that seemed unusual in button-down Washington.”
“Despite initial outrage and a humanitarian spirit, the first lady’s campaign to tell the world about the kidnapped schoolgirls – in the hope they’d be saved – ultimately failed.
In retrospect, the public-awareness campaign seemed a little dreamy.”
The hypocrisy of the Obamas in ‘Saving Our Girls’ is stunning.
The hashtag #BringBackOurGirls” should be changed to #SaveOurGirls” From The Likes Of The Obamas.
There was a time long ago when America came first. A time when our founders, many whose names you would not recognize, risked everything to birth this nation. A nation where natural rights were granted by God and recognized by our Constitution. A time when our first president could easily have continued his administration beyond two terms, but didn’t, lest he appear to be a king rather than a president. There was a time when members of congress served their country and its people for a relatively short time and then reentered private life to submit to what they had created, so as not to appear to be part of a cabal. That was the very old.
A cabal did eventually form, a criminal organization that does not know God and is determined to lord over men and women as was done before our country came to be. This cabal has now turned into a swamp, filled with monsters of self-interest, and agents of tyranny. That is now the old.
President Trump made fools of them all. It took a non-political businessman who owes no favors to accomplish what they couldn’t or wouldn’t do
For the last 120 years, except for brief respites during the Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Kennedy and Reagan administrations, the swamp took hold, selling us down the river for their personal gain. They made bad trade deals and pushed us into useless wars so the nation’s military industrial complex and their congressional patrons could benefit at the expense of dead and wounded American soldiers.
Presidents told us we were moving toward a service economy, changes no voter wanted or anticipated. They told us that the cheap products we would buy from China would be good for our nation. They forgot to tell us that the loss of our manufacturing prowess would cost millions of jobs, devastate industrial cities and towns, be a major threat to our national security, benefit the corporations looking for cheap labor and raw materials, and be the dominant contributor toward building the largest communist behemoth in the world.
Amazingly, we are now witnessing a new paradigm born not of the old, but of the very old…America First. It is an adage forgotten by too many past presidents. If America is healthy, so is the free world. For the last four years it has proven itself to be not only compelling, but effective.
It remains not merely a slogan, but a powerful movement. A movement not to be trifled with.
Of course, it doesn’t end there with a lesson learned. The swamp, the cabal was not going to allow their rice bowl to be disturbed. They went to war against a president who had the fortitude and chutzpah to show the experts, the swamp creatures, what their priorities should be.
President Trump made fools of them all. It took a non-political businessman who owes no favors to accomplish what they couldn’t or wouldn’t do. And now, they feel, he must pay.
They tried and continue to try with every political trick in their quiver. First it was a Russia collusion tale, then a Ukrainian quid pro quo narrative. Then, it was an attempt at impeachment. When that failed, the Chinese communists dived in immediately with their manufactured bio-weapon, COVID-19. Still no luck. Now the Democrats are insisting on mail-in voting because of the COVID lockdowns that they have determined to keep alive. Ballots will be sent to almost everyone living in the United States, registered voters, non-registered, citizens, non-citizens, everyone.
Mail-in voter fraud will be the most dangerous of the political tactics
Mail-in voter fraud will be the most dangerous of the political tactics. It has the potential of pushing us over the edge toward civil war. The Democrats have hinted that they will not concede or accept a second Trump term. They have even recruited some retired swamp generals and circulated stories that the military will have to get involved in a Trump departure. The counting could take months. In the meantime they will have an army of lawyers with Nancy Pelosi standing by to assume the presidency.
Much of our country has been turned over to domestic enemies, a disloyal opposition. Committed Communists now dominate many blue cities, vilify police, drive out good citizens and investment. Almost 1,000 people per day are moving into states like Florida. While others are leaving blue states for red states like Arizona, South Carolina, Texas, Idaho, Montana. But, be assured, Trump supporters will not stand by and watch the President be railroaded.
What is so beyond the imagination, so loathsome in its reality, is the acceptance and apparent approval by the Democrats of the damage this minor pandemic and the policies of those past swamp administrations have done to our country and their outright callousness toward the people that make this country work, the middle class.
It should be obvious to everyone that President Trump has disturbed an old paradigm, a level of corruption and exploitation made normal for at least the last 100 years. We now have a welcome shift in objectives, and aspirations that has taken place in Washington. The interests of the everyday American is now at the center of the current administration’s attention. Special interests are no longer at the helm, steering our government in their direction. No more useless wars that make military suppliers and politicians rich while soldiers die and others live with grave physical and mental wounds. No more massive move by manufacturers leaving our shores to look for cheap labor. No more communist indoctrination of our young. No more selling of America.
This is not mere political warfare. It is spiritual warfare. Everything (Very) Old Is New Again. Godspeed, President Trump.
Nancy Pelosi previously labeled all Trump supporters as “enemies of the state.” Similarly we note the apparatus of the administrative state labels Julian Assange the same. There’s a good argument that the reason why Assange is considered such a threat to the U.S. is specifically because he could expose the lies of the administrative state.
As a consequence the U.S. intelligence apparatus has targeted the WikiLeaks founder and the Bill Barr DOJ is being extremely aggressive in their effort to get control of him. Tucker Carlson discussed this dynamic last night; albeit stopping short of the brutally honest part.
.
To understand the risk Julian Assange represents to the administrative state, it is important to understand the extent of CIA, FBI and DOJ operations in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA origination and FBI investigation.
By now people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor now generally admitted/identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep}
In a similar fashion the CIA tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets much easier.
One of the more interesting aspects to the Durham probe is a possibility of a paper-trail created as a result of the tasking operations. We should watch closely for more evidence of a paper trail as some congressional reps have hinted toward documented evidence (transcripts, recordings, reports) that are exculpatory to the targets (Page & Papadop). HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes has strongly hinted that very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and yet withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page that also mentions George Papadopoulos. I digress…
However, there is an aspect to the domestic U.S. operation that also bears the fingerprints of the CIA; only this time due to the restrictive laws on targets inside the U.S. the CIA aspect is less prominent. This is where FBI Agent Peter Strzok working for both agencies starts to become important.
Remember, it’s clear in the text messages Strzok has a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA. Additionally, Brennan has admitted Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it is almost guaranteed the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane” was co-authored from the CIA by Strzok…. and Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok appears to be the very eager, profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe, who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion-GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015; at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons.
It was also Fusion-GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working double-agents for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion-GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting… back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan fell out of a helicopter to his death (just before it crashed).
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, it was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit.
International operations directed by the CIA, and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin]
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA), and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr (CIA, Fusion-GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump, and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer, hired by Fusion-GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence; and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate is presumably what John Durham is currently reviewing.
The key point of all that background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ, put a hell of a lot of work into it. Intelligence community work that Durham is now unraveling.
We also know specifically that John Durham is looking at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This is important because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks.
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the EDVA. From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What was the DOJ waiting for?
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative, it would make sense for the FBI to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange; and why the FBI would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018. The EDVA sat on the indictment while the Mueller probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who has researched this three year fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17; this timing against Assange is just too coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.
This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election. The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment; and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from Crowdstrike, a DNC contractor.
The CIA holds a massive conflict of self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim. The FBI holds a massive interest in maintaining that claim. All of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also have a vested self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack.
This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus…. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public.
Now, if we know this, and you know this; and everything is cited and factual… well, then certainly AG Bill Barr knows this.
“MAGA vs. The Deep State Swamp” Number 5 in the Drain the Swamp Series.
For the last four years President Trump has tirelessly exposed the Deep State Swamp. Trump has shown the American people the ruthless corruption in our government and called out the endless propaganda of the controlled mainstream media complex.
President Trump’s first term went by quickly and although much was accomplished, there was still a lot left to do.
The swamp runs deeper than anyone ever imagined.
Now the Democrat nominee, Joe Biden, claims he represents ‘decency.’ He’s a career politician known for gr op ing and sniffing females—adults and children alike.
He made it possible for his son Hunter to receive graft from Communist China. He believes taxpayers should fund abortion on demand. He believes in more taxes, a bigger and more bloated government, political correctness, BLM and ANTIFA, endless lockdowns, and a mask mandate. Joe is pro-war, a globalist, and he supported tossing low-level drug offenders into prison. Does this sound decent to you? Trump is not perfect, but he stands in sharp contrast to Biden. While Joe is pro-China, Trump is pro-jobs for Americans. He wants to preserve our free speech and our right to own firearms. He is a nationalist, not a globalist. He wants to put an end to the rioting and looting. He wants elections to be held in a fair and traditional manner, while Democrats want mail-in ballots, which will open the door to fraud. Trump is anti-war. That alone is a good reason to reelect him. The contrast between the two presidential candidates is obvious and definite. President Trump remains the only decent choice.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 