IG Release Date Set for June 14th – First IG Hearing June 18th…


Inspector General Michael Horowitz has informed the Senate Judiciary Committee (full pdf below) the anticipated final publication date for the IG report on how the Obama DOJ and FBI handled the Clinton investigation will be Thursday June 14th, 2018.

The fact-based draft report to the principals was submitted on May 16th.  Following the two week period for input from the principals outlined in the draft report, the IG “referencer” within the DOJ-Office of Inspector General then determines which responses will be added for the final report. The report is anticipated to be 400 to 500 pages.

As customary for Michael Horowitz, his office adds the approved responses and then outlines additional IG replies to those responses in the final report.  Apparently, due to the scale of the report, the response and reply phase has been extensive.

Mr. Horowitz informs congress today the final report will be publicly available on Thursday June 14, and he will accommodate oversight with an appearance before congress on Monday June 18, 2018 to discuss the findings.

Here’s the letter from Inspector General Horowitz:

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/381292386/content?start_page=1&view_mode=&access_key=key-NPPyiUc9PNF8UJb52Y6L

.

 

Senate Intelligence Committee Under Pending DOJ Investigation for “unauthorized disclosure of information”….


This is one of those little snippets of information, buried in the swamp and avoided by the media, that seems small and disingenuous unless you know the corrupt record of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

According to Wall Street Journalist Byron Tau, the Senate Intel Committee unanimously voted today to release documents to the DOJ “in connection with a pending investigation arising out of the unauthorized disclosure of information.“:

The Senate Intelligence Committee is one of the most politically corrupt committees in congress.  There is nothing available as to what information was disclosed; however, this is the committee where:

•Dianne Feinstein was Vice-Chair in 2016, and her former staffer, Dan Jones, is heavily involved in Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele. [See Here]  By position Feinstein was on the Gang-of-Eight during the 2016 CIA, DOJ and FBI Counterintelligence Operation.  The same Feinstein that arbitrarily released the testimony of Glenn Simpson in 2018 without discussing with anyone [See Here]

•Mark Warner took over as Vice-Chair in 2017 and was involved in covert attempts to contact Christopher Steele [See Here]  By position Warner is currently on the Gang-of-Eight, and participated in the DOJ-NSD, FBI and efforts of the Mueller investigation.  The same Mark Warner who demanded the FBI and DOJ must not comply with document production for congressional oversight [See Here]

•Richard Burr was/is the Chairman of the Committee and was an active participant in all of the CIA, DOJ-NSD and FBI operations past and present.  Not accidentally Burr and Warner wrote a committee report supporting the Russian Collusion Narrative.

The entire committee has been transparently compromised for years.  Even James Comey refused to meet with the committee.  If you review the names on the committee you will note the alignment of Never-Trumpers and secret Sea Island meeting participants.  So it doesn’t come as a surprise to see the DOJ looking into unauthorized releases of information coming from within the committee and/or staff connected to the committee.

The darkest part of the corrupt intelligence community hangs over the Senate Intelligence Committee like an ever-present cloud destined to block sunlight.  Bad, corrupt and sketchy stuff goes on inside this committee….. stay tuned.

Grassley Again Demands Flynn Documents: “If the facts are inconsistent with the plea agreement, that would be an entirely different kettle of fish.”…


Senator Chuck Grassley is not happy with the DOJ and FBI refusing to turn over documents and material surrounding the investigation of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.   After more than a year of requests, and after several weeks of current specific requests, Senator Grassley sends a pointed letter (full pdf below) to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.  Grassley smells something suspicious:

If the facts are inconsistent with the plea agreement, that would be an entirely different kettle of fish.

The Department’s reply to my May 11, 2018 letter seeking information about the circumstances surrounding Lt. General Michael Flynn’s reported conversations with the Russian ambassador and FBI records related to those conversations is insufficient. The letter only recounts a series of publicly known facts about Lt. General Flynn’s plea agreement and relies on improper excuses in refusing to provide the requested information. The Committee requires this information to fulfill its Constitutional function and its charge under Senate Rules to conduct oversight of the Department of Justice.

First, as you know, some of that information was first requested on a bipartisan basis before your confirmation. The Committee has waited patiently for much more than a year for the criminal inquiry related to Lt. General Flynn to conclude. It has been more than five months since his guilty plea. Thus, there is no longer any legitimate reason to withhold facts from the Senate about the circumstances of his conversations with the Russian ambassador and his FBI interview.

Second, the Department’s letter erroneously suggests that complying with Congressional oversight would result in “the reality or the appearance of political interference” in a “pending criminal prosecution.” There is no pending prosecution. The guilty plea was more than five months ago.

The Department’s letter describes in detail what everyone already knows. Lt. General Flynn admitted to the Statement of Offense with the able assistance of counsel. All that remains is for Lt. General Flynn to be sentenced. Simply disclosing facts to the Committee could not possibly “interfere” with the case at this late date, assuming those facts are consistent with the representations that prosecutors arranged for Lt. General Flynn to swear to in federal court.

If the facts are inconsistent with the plea agreement, that would be an entirely different kettle of fish.  (more pdf link)

Here’s the full letter:

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/381198288/content?start_page=1&view_mode=&access_key=key-uf1gxFO9BtylvpAk6Tv1

.

IG Leaks – Media Frame Clinton/Obama Defense: James Comey as “Insubordinate”…


While no-one has yet to see the actual Inspector General Mike Horowitz report outlining how the DOJ and FBI handled the Hillary Clinton email investigation, the media are beginning to shape the narrative.

In a summary of Bill Priestap’s testimony, via The Hill, the narrative begins by focusing on James Comey:  “Priestap “completely” backed up everything that Comey said, according to a source familiar with his testimony.”  The narrative construct gains clarity with a report from ABC highlight James Comey as “insubordinate”:

(Via ABC) The Justice Department’s internal watchdog has concluded that James Comey defied authority at times during his tenure as FBI director, according to sources familiar with a draft report on the matter.

One source told ABC News that the draft report explicitly used the word “insubordinate” to describe Comey’s behavior. Another source agreed with that characterization but could not confirm the use of the term.

In the draft report, Inspector General Michael Horowitz also rebuked former Attorney General Loretta Lynch for her handling of the federal investigation into Hillary Clinton‘s personal email server, the sources said.  (more)

Given the nature of the recent explanations as provided by the attorney for Andrew McCabe; and accepting the prior repeated assertions of FBI Director James Comey: “that was not my understanding”, we can begin to assemble the preferred narrative direction.

It would appear the media, and swamp proletariat, are attempting to cut off any potential damage to the Obama administration by placing a firewall atop James Comey.

Whereas Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe was a rogue element manipulating his subordinate officials entirely on his own; while FBI Director James Comey was oblivious to the corrupt conduct undertaken by the officials in/around/under his authority, and insubordinate to the customary procedures, professional responsibilities and chain-of-command.

That appears to be the current advanced narrative.  Meanwhile we await the actual substance of the IG report into how the DOJ and FBI conducted the Clinton classified email investigation. .

Disappointing – Only Three Lawmakers Attended Priestap Testimony…


Yesterday FBI Director of Counterintelligence E.W. “Bill” Priestap testified to a joint session of the House Judiciary and House Oversight committees.

The hearing was a matter of strong public interest.  Mr. Priestap was questioned for approximately seven hours.  However, journalist Olivia Beavers covering for The Hill dropped a detail that most, including myself, might find rather curious:

(The Hill) […] Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), however, said he felt that Priestap didn’t say anything that would indicate there was “political bias that motivated the Hillary Clinton email investigation.”

Priestap “completely” backed up everything that Comey said, according to a source familiar with his testimony.

Only three lawmakers — Jordan, Meadows and Krishnamoorthi — attended the hearing, which took place on the first day after a weeklong recess.

Priestap’s interview comes after the joint House investigation stalled for months after being first announced.  (more)

Yes, despite the hearing being a joint session of both the House Judiciary and House Oversight committees only three congressmen, two republicans and one democrat attended:  Jim Jordan (R), Mark Meadows (R), and Raja Krishnamoorthi (D).

Not only did only three congressional reps attend, but Chairman Trey Gowdy and Chairman Bob Goodlatte did not attend.

What does that tell you?

We have previously noted the disconnected interest when we discussed how few congressional reps were going to the DOJ and/or FBI offices to actually view documents.  Now we see one of the key and central figures in the DOJ and FBI conduct coming to Capitol Hill and only three Reps attend the hearing.

Could it be the vast majority, ie. UniParty, don’t want to know?

Disappointing.

How a Prosecutor’s Case Collapsed in New York City and Exposed Government Corruption in the Process


One of the more fascinating examples of how the government prosecutors are looking for high profile cases to further personal careers rather than actually policing society to protect the people has been exposed by the sale of the Leonardo DaVinci painting of Jesus Christ. I previously reported that  DaVinci’s 500-year-old painting, known as Salvator Mundi (Saviour of the World), is the only work of this artist in private hands. It was sold at Christie’s auction room in New York for a record $450 million – almost a half-billion back in November 2017.

It turns out, that the sale of this painting has ruined the theory of Federal prosecutors in New York City who actually spent more than a year building a case against a Swiss art dealer. That’s right, he was not even American. The theory was that the dealer was “improperly” putting mark-ups on the sale of dozens of masterworks to a Russian oligarch. Again, this is a sale by a Swiss dealer to a Russian. What does this have to do with New York City?

He arranged the sale of DaVinci’s Salvator Mundi for $128 million and secretly netted the dealer more than $40 million in markup profit. The prosecutors spent more than one-year interviewing witnesses and even issued grand jury subpoenas for records of the transactions. They managed to get a senior executive at Sotheby’s to help them on the theory that $128 million was overcharging for the work. The Sotheby executive was to be a witness in the case they were going to bring in New York City for criminal prosecution. Then the painting sold at auction for $450 million. Oops!

Well, so much for the “expert” at Sotheby’s who would have taken the stand and professed in his opinion a $40 million profit was outrageous and the painting was never worth $128 million. There goes “opinion” again! When it sold for $450 million, all the time and effort proved to be worthless. The prosecutors were paid by tax money to do what? Further their own careers? The dealer was Swiss and the buyer was in Russia. Just how does this even impact the United States? This is NOT the Roman Empire. A prosecutor in New York City has no such constitutional jurisdiction to police the entire world. Normally, the court would not entertain such cases. But the Southern District of New York is so steeped in corruption with its 93% conviction rate, judges have completely failed to do their constitutional duty and stop prosecutors from using the process to further their own careers.

The Uses of Children


By Tabitha Korol

Using children in war situations is not a new phenomenon.  They are the most vulnerable to the ruling powers, easily taken from unarmed parents and pressed into service by a government. Czarist Russia drafted children for 20 years, at least 300,000 non-Jewish and 75,000 Jewish Cantonists. Hitler’s Germany drafted thousands of young boys, Hitler youth, indoctrinating them to dedicate their lives for the Reich, unto death if necessary, and most were poorly trained and sent on suicide missions.  As many as 40 million children, orphaned by AIDS, and controlled by drugs and religious or political fervor, were recruited in Africa.

Today, nearly 80 percent of about 30 conflicts worldwide have as many as 300,000 young combatants, ages 7 through 15, serving the war effort as scouts, messengers, looters, sex slaves, minesweepers, laborers, makers of bombs and terror tunnels, advance ambush, and suicide bombers.  Nearly a half-million children serve in armies not at war – duped, exploited and wasted.

The use of children extends to indoctrination.  In Islamic shame/honor cultures, the child is forced to learn the Koran with punishment by the whip, bonding them with violence for life.  The child bride, often bartered or kidnapped, becomes an uneducated, incompetent and irresponsible mother, who is still dealing with the abuse, anxiety and trauma of having her female identity excised – female genital mutilation.  The ritual produces a damaged self-image, the shame of being female and a self-hatred that is passed on to her numerous children who may well be the result of rape in a forced marriage.  Shaming fuels violent aggression that reinforces the male’s brutality, not unlike the self-pity and sense of victimization that fueled Nazism.

Defenseless children may also be used as human shields and jihadis to increase their own death toll and net sympathy from the United Nations, and the girls often serve as “comfort women” for their commanders, to become impregnated and sent into combat with their babies strapped to their backs. The mothers consider their children expendable because they themselves were expendable. Called “the martyr in his mother’s womb,” the fetus is dedicated to death even before his birth.  The cause of Islamic conquest is foremost, and the youths who do survive their horrific experiences are so severely scarred that they will suffer lifelong mental health problems. Despite the changes in war and engagement, the aggressor’s agenda is always expansionism, acquisition, domination, and elimination, and the disposable children are sent away for hijrah, jihad by emigration.

If war is the annihilation and replacement of one population by another, then America is experiencing a silent assault and eradication.  One method of societal reduction or eradication is the promotion of a woman’s right to abortion over the right of the child to live and prosper.  The child is mere material, to be used or discarded, as in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.

The schools are now devaluating sexual differences, first with language, replacing accepted pronouns with gender-neutral sounds and, second, with denying the child’s nature, in the interest of “complete equality.” Teaching staff are encouraging homosexuality, to emasculate the boys and erase the desire for courtship, marriage and reproduction, reinforced by Walt Disney films that encourage a “gay agenda.”  Family Research Council has just revealed that hours of instruction on evolving “sexual identity,” contraceptive drugs and devices, and consenting to sex, are taught in Fairfax County School. The appalling curriculum includes (1) gender fluidity: biological sex is meaningless, (2) embracing gender transitioning, (3) encouraging risky sex, (4) discontinuing abstinence education, (5) teaching use of all contraceptive devices without divulging health risks, (6) parents may not opt children out of 8th grade comprehensive dating lessons, and (7) stripping the word “clergy” from adult consultants.

Social engineering is another exploitation of children.  Groups, such as the Boy Scouts, established to prepare boys for manhood, independence, strength, creativity, adventure and daring, pride in country and the will to defend our country, are seeing drastic deviations.  In a “celebration of cultural exchange, mutual understanding, peace and friendship,” the 2019 World Scout Jamboree event will host thousands of attendees from more than 200 countries and territories and make condoms readily available.  For 108 years, the Boy Scouts of America’s flagship program has been known simply as the Boy Scouts.  With girls soon entering the ranks, the group says that iconic name will change to Scouts BSA next February, 2019.

America’s Common Core standards disrespect Biblical and Judeo-Christian values and substitute a whitewashed Islamic and Marxist ideological indoctrination. The storyline is equality of rules and regulations fed by academia, the caliphate, duma, or “Sorospolis” to a passive student body.  As in any fascistic system, information is controlled, and dissimilar publications banned.  The students are methodically poisoned, their morality shifted from general ethical principles, such as the Golden Rule, to strengthening the Leftist cause.

Because parents protested Common Core, Jeb Bush deceptively introduced his “personalized learning.” Better characterized as “depersonalized training,” it puts children on computer screens that track their thoughts and determine their futures, and features less interaction with teachers and fellow students, allowing for complete indoctrination. The American Psychological Association found increased stress and anxiety for teens (8.7%/2005, 11.5%/2014), due to more restrictive schooling and grading, and doubled suicide rate (tripled for girls).

Already employed in some schools is the deliberate dissuasion for children to bond and develop close and lasting friendships, thereby creating feelings of loneliness and isolation and rendering the children vulnerable to ideological brainwashing.  Researchers have said that music, usually a reflection of the times, has been getting sadder over the last 30 years.  The “maleness” of songs has also decreased.

The schools and media are promoting a false narrative of multiculturalism, when the goal should be multi-ethnicities, religions and races, living harmoniously under the host’s culture. Migrants to America should be seeking America’s peace and prosperity; to deny its existence is to deliberately propose her people’s destruction – ethnocide.  As such, the accusations of racism and colonization of “white-supremacist Europeans or Americans” prepare the groundwork for the annihilation of our heritage and language.  Islam has declared its purpose to replace our culture with theirs against a backdrop of hate spewed by progressive faculty, black activists, feminists, and pro-Muslim organizations that demonize Israel and Jews, Christians and America.  The children are the war materiel.

Universities are keeping their students ignorant, unskilled, and fearful of hearing opposition to the leftist agenda.  They offer protection from the outside world in safe spaces, cry closets and therapy animals.  Taught to fear self-reliance, the resultant adults will require government welfare programs, monthly stipends, and healthcare that includes heavy medication for cooperation.

It is time to connect the dots, because each of these instances has one thing in common, the abuse and destruction of children, which, in turn, removes future adults and decreases world population.  This silent war of annihilation is being waged by the United Nations; their UN 2030 Agenda describes their plan to control every nation, and the methods are already in operation.  While some believe this to be a desire for Utopia, others may relate it to guilt for Europe’s hand in World War II.  Whatever the motivation, the ruling class is creating an obedient underclass.  In point of fact, this is a fascist agenda of conquest, to stunt natural growth, and prohibit the use of our natural resources to nourish our survival.  The result will achieve what other tyrants have achieved with weapons and bloodshed – depopulation, except on a now much larger scale, using children.

The Globalists of the United Nations are dedicated to one world, unified under one flag or governing body, and the elimination of countries’ borders, sovereignty and of individual’s natural rights, and of that historic bulwark against the abuses of tyrants, the nuclear family, best attacked through the children. They seek complete freedom of migration worldwide to “increase liberty, reduce global poverty, and accelerate economic growth.”  However, where there is mobility of capital and labor, increases in capital cause decreased labor, resulting in disproportionately low wages, reduced healthcare and education, and shrinking businesses.  Unrestrained immigration brought us 14 million illegals by 2012.  It does not produce assimilation, but a higher incidence of crime and conflict from dissimilar ideologies and the depopulation objective of our silent warriors – our endangered children.

 

Representative Ron DeSantis Discusses Peter Strzok and Inspector General Report…


Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) discusses FBI agent Peter Strzok’s involvement in the Clinton email probe and the Russia investigation; along with the anticipated DOJ-OIG report:

#Spygate – President Trump Highlights Lou Dobbs Segment Outlining December 2015 FBI CoIntel Operation….


The backstory is important here.  Two days ago internet researcher Nick Falco discovered a potentially damning text dated December 28th 2015 within a previously released set of Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages.  The original text was redacted in one section (Page #31); however, somehow further down the release (Page #159) the same text was not redacted.  It is presumed the FBI redacted the word “lures”, whereas the IG did not.

In one release (page #31) the word “lures” was redacted.  In the second release (page #159) it was NOT redacted.

The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, Chairman Ron Johnson, released over 500 pages of documents and texts.  On page #159 (pdf here) the unredacted version of the following message appears:

(Link to pdf – page #159)

“You get all our oconus lures approved?”

“OCONUS” means Outside Continental U.S.  “LURES” in this context is ‘spies’; or as Chris Farrell discusses, likely double agents.  The messages were December 28th, 2015.

•Peter Strzok asking Lisa Page:  Did you get all our outside U.S. spies approved?
•Lisa Page responds: “No, it’s just implicated a much bigger policy issue. I’ll explain later. Might even be able to use it as a pretext for a call…”

The implication is this could have been the pre-planning for #Spygate. This is what Lou Dobbs and Chris Farrell are discussing; and apparently President Trump noticed:

(Link to Trump Tweet)

Here’s the full release of documents:

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/371002694/content?start_page=1&view_mode=&access_key=key-rnGpaGY4OR6P8VD4nYT5

Fired FBI Director Andrew McCabe Requests Criminal Immunity in exchange for Congressional Testimony…


Wait, what?  We’ve obviously come a full 180° from the place where Democrats were proclaiming McCabe’s innocence; and we’ve entered the phase where McCabe is requesting criminal immunity in exchange for testimony about what he knows of the corrupt FBI operations in 2016 and 2017. [Worm Turning Speech Increases]

In a series of letters going back and forth between Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and Michael Bromwich, the attorney for fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, Bromwich is requesting criminal immunity in exchange for cooperation.

On May 31st, 2018, Chairman Grassley invited Andrew McCabe to testify [SEE HERE]; On June 4th Bromwich responded [SEE HERE]  Grassley is requesting emails McCabe said he sent to Comey about talking to the media.  According to McCabe, despite his false statements to FBI and INSD investigators (under oath), his conduct was with the full knowledge of FBI Director James Comey.  Grassley was asking for proof.  Bromwich responded by saying McCabe doesn’t have the emails, the current FBI does.

Here’s the response letter:

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/381103669/content?start_page=1&view_mode=&access_key=key-280q4Br4TU5TEN6TSNpw

.

Chairman Grassley followed up requesting a copy of the Non Disclosure Agreement signed by Andrew McCabe which blocks McCabe from producing the requested documents [SEE HERE] and Grassley also responds to the request for criminal immunity.

First, with respect to your testimony, the Committee’s understanding of various controversies at the FBI related to and following the 2016 election would be greatly aided by your testimony, not only at the upcoming hearing but in a more comprehensive private setting as well.

While I have not yet done so, I am willing to discuss with the Ranking Member your request that the Committee consider seeking a court order compelling you to testify under a grant of immunity. However, under 18 U.S. Code § 6005, seeking such an order requires a two-thirds vote of the Committee, and even if that were to occur, the Justice Department would then have a formal opportunity to delay any testimony and attempt to persuade the Committee not to proceed. Before even beginning to consider whether to initiate that process, the Committee would need to know a lot more about the anticipated scope, nature, and extent of your testimony. The Committee could then informally consult with the Department to solicit its views before deciding whether to proceed formally.  (read more)

McCabe’s lawyer Michael Bromwich responds June 5th:

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/381104242/content?start_page=1&view_mode=&access_key=key-XrQf0Ffn54gplHayscQz

.

According to CNN – Grassley has set the Judiciary hearing for next Monday, but it could be delayed, as the inspector general’s report — while a moving target — is still not public yet. Sources familiar with the report describe it as a massive undertaking, walking through the events leading up to the 2016 election over roughly 500 pages.