AGENDAS: The Role of Violence in the Revolutionary’s Plan


Excellent work here — well done!

Black3Actual's avatarThe Oil for Your Lamp

I want to ask you to think back over the past few years.  Try to remember how many times you have seen organized violence employed on a massive scale.  I am going to ask you to reject the media’s claim that it has been ‘spontaneous.’  It hasn’t.  It is well known that it was all planned: from Occupy Wall Street to the Arab Spring.  All of it was ‘organized’ by violent revolutionaries, and the violence is used as part of their formula for toppling governments.  This is because the model works.  It was how Russia fell to Lenin, and how Hitler tried to take over Germany — the first time.  The idea is, if you can create enough hatred within society, then cause it to just break out into social unrest, then others will ‘stand up’ and the existing government can be brought down.  This is when the revolutionary…

View original post 1,043 more words

A Russian Plane Zaps U.S. Warship’s Missile Defense System


Written by Gary North on November 13, 2014

An unarmed Russian bomber in April flew over a high-tech U.S. ship. A crew member pressed a button. Poof! No more missile defense system on the ship. No more radar. The ship became a defenseless floating coffin. Then the plane flew over the blind ship a dozen times. Basically, it was “Nyah, nyah, nyah.”

This story got no play in American media.

On 10 April 2014, the USS Donald Cook entered the waters of the Black Sea and on 12 April a Russian Su-24 tactical bomber flew over the vessel triggering an incident that, according to several media reports, completely demoralized its crew, so much so that the Pentagon issued a protest.

The USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) is a 4th generation guided missile destroyer whose key weapons are Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of up to 2,500 kilometers, and capable of carrying nuclear explosives. This ship carries 56 Tomahawk missiles in standard mode, and 96 missiles in attack mode.

The US destroyer is equipped with the most recent Aegis Combat System. It is an integrated naval weapons systems which can link together the missile defense systems of all vessels embedded within the same network, so as to ensure the detection, tracking and destruction of hundreds of targets at the same time. In addition, the USS Donald Cook is equipped with 4 large radars, whose power is comparable to that of several stations. For protection, it carries more than fifty anti-aircraft missiles of various types.

Meanwhile, the Russian Su-24 that buzzed the USS Donald Cook carried neither bombs nor missiles but only a basket mounted under the fuselage, which, according to the Russian newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta, contained a Russian electronic warfare device called Khibiny.

As the Russian jet approached the US vessel, the electronic device disabled all radars, control circuits, systems, information transmission, etc. on board the US destroyer. In other words, the all-powerful Aegis system, now hooked up — or about to be — with the defense systems installed on NATO’s most modern ships was shut down, as turning off the TV set with the remote control.

The Russian Su-24 then simulated a missile attack against the USS Donald Cook, which was left literally deaf and blind. As if carrying out a training exercise, the Russian aircraft — unarmed — repeated the same maneuver 12 times before flying away.

After that, the 4th generation destroyer immediately set sail towards a port in Romania.

Since that incident, which the Atlanticist media have carefully covered up despite the widespread reactions sparked among defense industry experts, no US ship has ever approached Russian territorial waters again.

According to some specialized media, 27 sailors from the USS Donald Cook requested to be relieved from active service.

Vladimir Balybine — director of the research center on electronic warfare and the evaluation of so-called “visibility reduction” techniques attached to the Russian Air Force Academy — made the following comment: “The more a radio-electronic system is complex, the easier it is to disable it through the use of electronic warfare.”

 

In short, “back to the drawing board!”

Problem: it takes about seven years for the Pentagon to design and deploy a new cybersecurity system. As for missile guidance systems, it takes even longer.

If you want to know how much bang for the taxpayer’s buck the Pentagon gets, begin here.

This is blind man’s bluff. The Pentagon is the blind man.

The Pentagon’s strategy is to play dumb. “Incident? What incident?”

Congressional hearings? Don’t hold your breath.

Now Russia’s defense minister says that Russian bombers will soon start patrolling the Gulf of Mexico.

George H. W. Bush and NATO promised in 1990 that NATO would not be expanded to Russia’s borders. Then NATO broke the promise. It was mission creep by a bloated bureaucracy, whose original mission was to defend Western Europe for a few hours against an invasion by the USSR until the USA launched nuclear missiles on the USSR. That mission officially ended in 1991, when the USSR committed suicide.

Russian bombers in the Gulf? We are now seeing tit-for-tat. It is mission creep from the other side.All those Pentagon bucks! So little bang!

Continue Reading on http://www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html

Attention America: Your Windbag President Is Pushing Australia Towards China


Obama knows exactly what he is doing and that is the dismemberment of the American economy and influence. He and his minions that surround him want us reduced into a second rate power which means that China must take over the roll we formally had. Unfortunately all those that depended on us will now need to find new friends!

PA Pundits - International's avatarPA Pundits International

Bolt New 01By Andrew Bolt ~

AbbottObamaG20 Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott and President Obama at the recent G20 Conference in Brisbane Australia.

This is more like it – and Barack Obama could be further punished for his pathetic politicking by Australia now joining China’s regional infrastructure bank:

Trade and Investment Minister Andrew Robb … has sent Barack Obama a sharp return-fire message: that Australia expects to be treated with respect — not insulted — and that the President’s remarks in Brisbane were wrong, misinformed and unnecessary…

The Robb remarks are both an honest expression of sentiment in much of the Abbott cabinet and a useful message to the Obama White House about the President’s gratuitous intervention in Australian politics against the Abbott government…

Robb told Sky News’s Australian Agenda program yesterday he was “surprised” by Obama’s speech, he believed the President was “not informed” about Australia’s climate change policy, that his “content…

View original post 269 more words

The feminist revolutionaries have won. Insurgents have arisen to challenge the new order. As always, they’re outlaws.


An interesting series of discussions on the feminist revolution! I would add that the internal US dynamics between men and women as women take more and more of the leadership positions will not be as important as the result of a feminist lead country will be in a world dominated by aggressive males e.g. putin!

Larry Kummer, Editor's avatarFabius Maximus website

Summary:  Yesterday’s post took 2,200 words to explain a simple theory, because I took readers on a journey to “derive” the conclusions. Here’s the spoiler version, in which we “cut to the chase” — showing only the last section.

——————————————

Feminism is one of the big revolutions of our time, over-turning our concepts of romance and marriage. In response to its success, insurgents have arisen. It’s early days yet, too soon to forecast which side will win. Reviewers consider this one of the more shocking — and darker — posts of the almost 2,900 on the FM website. Post your reactions in the comments (at the original post). It’s the first of two posts today.

Settling for a beta

Feminism is a revolution, one with few or no precedents in history, now in the last stages of consolidating its victory.  We can only guess at the effects.  This post discusses one…

View original post 406 more words

​EU is in serious trouble and it’s not Russia’s fault


The Draconian progressive policies of the Obama administration, for the past 6 years, in implementing UN Agenda 21 are dragging down all the prescribe to that line of thinking!

Liberals and Communists are one in the same


I agree there really is not difference between a Communist a progressive or a liberal

Yep, Ukraine’s “Gold is Gone” [as in STOLEN]


This could be why the price of precious metals has not been following past patterns!

Fred Fleitz: Fatally Flawed Negotiations with Iran — The WMD Perspective


Obama has no interest in actually stopping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon!

BRICS’ Brazil President Next Washington Target


Obama does not like the BRIC’s but he likes America even less so keep that in mind.

Iran: It’s Not the Centrifuges —- It’s the Warhead


The warhead is the key as this articular discusses. The means of initiation critical mass was the most closely guarded secret since WW II.